CORONA Emails reveal how Fauci, head of NIH colluded to try to smear experts

day late

money? whats that?

Emails reveal how Fauci, head of NIH colluded to try to smear experts

Stephen M. Lepore

The emailsshow Fauci and Francis Collins attempting to coordinate a 'devastating takedown' of the Great Barringt...




'There needs to be a quick and devastating take down': Emails show how Fauci and head of NIH worked to discredit three experts who penned the Great Barrington Declaration which called for an end to lockdowns

The emails show Fauci and NIH Director Francis Collins attempting to coordinate a 'devastating takedown' of the Great Barrington Declaration (GBD)

AIER, a libertarian think tank, sponsored the GBD, which largely abandons lockdowns in favor of herd immunity strategy that allows life to return to normal

In an October 8 email from Collins to Fauci, the head of the NIH calls the GBD the work of 'three fringe epidemiologists' that 'seems to be getting a lot of attention'

Collins adds that 'there needs to be a quick and devastating published takedown of its premises. I don't see anything like that online yet - is it underway?'

Fauci later sends Collins multiple op-eds trashing the GBD in Wired and The Nation Magazine

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya - one of the authors and a DailyMail.com contributor - tweeted that he was the subject of a propaganda attack by his own government


By STEPHEN M. LEPORE FOR DAILYMAIL.COM

PUBLISHED: 19:16 EST, 18 December 2021 | UPDATED: 08:16 EST, 19 December 2021



Dr. Anthony Fauci and the head of the National Institute of Health (NIH) colluded on a way to discredit an alternative plan to deal with COVID from a group of experts, released emails reveal.

The emails, some of which were tweeted out on Saturday by Phil Magness, senior research faculty and interim research and education director at the American Institute for Economic Research (AIER), show Fauci and Francis Collins attempting to coordinate a 'devastating takedown' of the Great Barrington Declaration.

AIER, a libertarian think tank, sponsored the declaration, which largely abandons lockdowns in favor of a herd immunity strategy that allows life to return to normal.


In an October 8 email from Collins to Fauci, the head of the NIH calls the GBD the work of 'three fringe epidemiologists' that 'seems to be getting a lot of attention.'

Collins adds that 'there needs to be a quick and devastating published takedown of its premises. I don't see anything like that online yet - is it underway?'

Later in the day, Fauci sends Collins a Wired op-ed that refutes the notion of herd immunity stopping the pandemic.

Collins then sends Fauci an op-ed in The Nation also trashing the GBD.

A few days later, Collins emails Fauci a Washington Post op-ed he's quoted in headlined 'Proposal to hasten herd immunity to the coronavirus grabs White House attention but appalls top scientists.'

Collins - working under former President Donald Trump at the time - said 'my quotes are accurate but will not be appreciated in the [White House].'

Fauci responds: 'They are too busy with other things to worry about this. What you said was entirely correct.'

Later, Gregg Gonsalves - the writer of The Nation op-ed - sends Collins an email thanking him with a subject line that includes saying legendary AIDS activist Larry Kramer 'would be proud.'

Collins responds with a smiley face.

The GBD - authored by previous DailyMail.com contributor Jay Bhattacharya of Stanford University, Sunetra Gupta of the University of Oxford and Martin Kulldorff of Harvard University, calls for individuals at significantly lower risk of dying from COVID-19 – as well as those at higher risk who so wish – to be allowed 'to resume their normal lives.'

That would mean allowing people in low risk groups to go to offices, hang out in bars and restaurants and go to sporting and entertainment events.

The centerpiece of the declaration, according to Dr. Bhattacharya, is a call for increased focused protection of the vulnerable older population, who are more than a thousand times more likely to die from COVID infection than the young.

The declaration makes no mention of social distancing, masks, tracing, or long-term Covid cases but suggests that increased infection of those at lower risks would build herd immunity.

Bhattacharya tweeted in response to the emails: 'So now I know what it feels like to be the subject of a propaganda attack by my own government. Discussion and engagement would have been a better path.'

The emails - which happened while Fauci and Collins were working under President Trump - come as President Biden continues to struggle with the explosion of the Omicron variant across the country.

Biden will deliver a speech on Tuesday to announce new Covid measures to fight the rapidly-spreading Omicron variant.

It's anticipated that he will go beyond his already revealed 'Winter Plan' and address booster shots, lockdowns and mask mandates.

Earlier this month Biden announced a Covid plan to battle the virus throughout the colder months, which included booster shots for all adults, vaccinations for kids in efforts to keep schools open and expanding free at-home Covid testing.

As of Saturday morning, there were 830 cases of the Omicron Covid-19 variant confirmed by DNA sequencing across the country, a 97 percent increase from Friday morning's tally.

In reality, the true number of Omicron cases is much higher, as only 1 to 2 percent of all cases are sequenced for variant markers, but the testing data shows a disturbing national trend.

The CDC estimates that Omicron accounts for at least 13 percent of all new cases in New York, which on Saturday recorded its highest single-day tally of new Covid-19 cases ever at 29,908 - breaking its previous record of 21,027 set just one day earlier

'The winter Covid-19 surge is here,' warned New York Governor Kathy Hochul, urging everyone to get vaccinated and boosted.

Though New York's hospitalizations, which tend to lag new cases, remain below their peaks, they have climbed 25 percent in the past two weeks, straining the state's healthcare system.

Testing has now confirmed the presence of Omicron in every US state except for Oklahoma, Montana, North and South Dakota, Indiana, and Vermont, though the eventual confirmation of the highly transmissible variant in every state now seems assured.
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
Emails reveal how Fauci, head of NIH colluded to try to smear experts

I recommend anyone who can to listen to the Bannon War Room segment which co-hosts Robert F. Kennedy who is the author of the new book exposing Fauci.

Episode 1,496 – Fauci on Trial (50 minutes)

Kennedy is of course one of the founders of the Children's Health Defense and is a critic both of Covid "Vaccination" and plans by Bill Gates. He appears VERY knowledgeable about the problems/pitfalls of vaccination.

Kennedy is a little hard to follow as he has "vocal disphonia" which is a wavering of the voice caused by reasons unknown and for which there is no cure. But it is well worth the listen.

New Book Kennedy, Robert F., Jr. (2021). The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health. Simon & Schuster.

The book IS available at Amazon. Amazon.com or from the Children's Health Defense. Kennedy says they keep selling out.

No. 5 on the NYT Bestsellers list.

Unlike In Trump Time by Peter Navarro, which despite brisk sales the NYT WON'T show. https://www.einnews.com/pr_news/556...m-its-november-21-non-fiction-bestseller-list

Dobbin
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
The NY Times and Fauci are both deep state agents of evil.
One imagines only Kennedy's "name" is what gets him pull to the NYT Bestseller list.

Until recently - well, Obama years, RFKJr. was a flaming liberal "Greenie." From Wikipedia (Robert F. Kennedy)

Kennedy has been an advocate for a global transition away from fossil fuels toward renewable energy.[101][102] He has been particularly critical of the oil industry. He began his career at Riverkeeper during the time that the organization discovered that Exxon was using its oil tankers in order to steal fresh water from the Hudson River for use in its Aruba refinery and to sell to Caribbean Islands. Riverkeeper won a $2 million settlement against Exxon and lobbied successfully for a state law outlawing the practice.[103] In one of his first environmental cases, Kennedy filed a lawsuit against Mobil Oil for polluting the Hudson.[104]

Kennedy helped lead the battle against fracking in New York State.[105] He had been an early supporter of natural gas as viable bridge fuel to renewables, and a cleaner alternative to coal.[106] However, he said he turned against this controversial extraction method after investigating its cost to public health; climate and road infrastructure.[107] As a member of Governor Andrew Cuomo's fracking commission, Kennedy helped engineer the Governor's 2013 ban on fracking in New York State.[108]

Kennedy mounted a national effort against the construction of liquefied natural gas facilities.[109] Waterkeepers maintains a national watch that documents numerous crude oil spills annually. In Alaska, Kennedy was active in the fight to save the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR), the largest undisturbed ecosystem in North America, from drilling.[110]

In 2013, Kennedy assisted the Chipewyan First Nation and the Beaver Lake Cree fighting to protect their land from tar sands production.[111] In February 2013, while protesting the Keystone XL Pipeline Kennedy, along with his son, Conor, was arrested for blocking a thoroughfare in front of the White House during a protest.[112] In August 2016, Kennedy and Waterkeeper participated in protests to block the extension of the Dakota Access pipeline across the Sioux Indian Standing Rock Reservation's water supply.[113]

Kennedy claims that the only reason the oil industry is able to remain competitive against renewables and electric cars is through massive direct and indirect subsidies and political interventions on behalf of the oil industry. In a June 2017 interview on EnviroNews, Kennedy said about the oil industry, "That's what their strategy is: build as many miles of pipeline as possible. And what the industry is trying to do is to increase that level of infrastructure investment so our country won't be able to walk away from it.[114]
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. - Wikipedia

Kennedy's claim of direct and indirect subsidies is primarily the pricing of "leases" for oil production property. In many parts of the country, one owns down in the ground only to a certain "depth" (Pennsylvania here in the East.) Below that the government takes claim to what might be land containing oil or other fossil fuels. Leases allow the government to recoup some of the loss for government environmental controls of fuel extraction on that land and lessen the tax burden. The lease is typically "arbitrarily priced", may or may not involve "competitive bidding" and may invoke a direct loss for the oil company if no oil/gas/coal is found. Leases are typically long term and DO invoke the free market in their development.

So Kennedy's claim is accurately based, but inaccurate in a real world. Where does one set the price for something of demand when there is no competitive alternative? Kennedy's view is that "renewables" should set the price for fossil alternates - not the other way around. Instead real world sets lease price on a "perceived risk-reward" free enterprise modus.

And all this (above) is probably why Kennedy has access to the NYT Best-seller list. Kennedy's "Leftist" reputation precedes him.

Still, Kennedy is "shifting gears" in his muck-raking attention. Muckraker - Wikipedia

For now - Kennedy may be useful to MAGA.

Dobbin
 

Magdalen

Veteran Member
Concerning Mr. Kennedy's book ... I have a friend who works for the public library system here in Delaware. Delaware is a small state. There are only three counties with a total of 37 public libraries. Guess how many copies of his book exist in the Delaware public library system. ONE. And it's down in one of the less populated areas of the state. True, it's always out on loan and the reserve list is a mile long, but there is only one copy available.
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
Concerning Mr. Kennedy's book ... I have a friend who works for the public library system here in Delaware. Delaware is a small state. There are only three counties with a total of 37 public libraries. Guess how many copies of his book exist in the Delaware public library system. ONE. And it's down in one of the less populated areas of the state. True, it's always out on loan and the reserve list is a mile long, but there is only one copy available.
One imagines the same library has already removed "Little House on the Prairie" by Laura Ingalls Wilder. Only a leftist aversion would result in only ONE book available given the demand. Kindle (Amazon) has it available for literal pocket change.

The memory hole exists possibly in fact, but most certainly in the minds of some humans.

“Those who control the present, control the past and those who control the past control the future.” - Orwell

Dobbin
 

thompson

Certa Bonum Certamen

They Are Losing Control of the COVID Narrative, and They Will Respond with More Restrictions

December 19, 2021 | Sundance | 336 Comments

The people who benefit from the weaponization of a virus to attain ideological political objectives are losing control over the COVID narrative. The over-the-top proclamations of danger from the Omicron variant are their visible reaction. The people who need the control that COVID provides fear losing that control, thus, they need Omicron.

Dr. Francis Collins made several media appearances today, but only one of them is hidden from public view and difficult to find in order to share, the Collin’s appearance on FOX News Sunday. Why is that interview hidden? Because NIH Director Francis Collins was challenged to explain the email he wrote demanding a “quick and devastating takedown” of three renowned scientists whose opinion ran counter to Collins and Fauci lockdown and pro-vaccine agenda.

The critiquing scientists wrote: “We have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of prevailing COVID-19 policies. Continuing current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long term public health.” Collins responded to that criticism by demanding the scientists be targeted.

ZMMscul.jpg


I cannot provide the video, but if you find it – watch it for his physical discomfort. However, I can share the transcript: UPDATE: Found it, see below

COLLINS
: […] How did we get all of this so mixed up with social media, misinformation, and political insertion into the discussion? This is the thing for me on my last day as NIH director that I find particularly frustrating.

2:20 run time
View: https://twitter.com/SKMorefield/status/1472666552940044294?s=20


BAIER: Yes. Dr. Collins, we always hear follow the science and, you know, science is observation, description, experimentation and explanation, but it seems that a lot of health policymakers have been trying to silence opposing views.

In a newly released set of emails received from Freedom of Information Act between you and Dr. Fauci in October 2020, you reference the Great Barrington Declaration, that was a group of epidemiologists and public health scientists who wrote, quote, “We have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of prevailing COVID-19 policies. Continuing current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long term public health.

In this email to Dr. Fauci and Cliff Lane at NAH, you write, quote, “Hi Tony and Cliff, see” — and you connected the Great Barrington Declaration link. “This proposal from three fringe epidemiologists who met with the Secretary seems to be getting a lot of attention — and even a co-signature from a Nobel Prize winner Michael Leavitt at Stanford. There needs to be a quick and devastating public takedown of its premises. I don’t see anything like that online yet. Is it underway? Francis.”

Did you write that?

COLLINS: I did write that, and I will stand by that. Let me explain. What was being proposed there was basically saying, let’s not worry about mitigation, let’s just let this virus rip. This is, of course, before we had vaccines and, basically, these — I will call them fringe epidemiologists who really did not have the credentials to be making such a grand sweeping statement — were saying, just let the virus run through the population and eventually then everybody will have had it and we’ll be OK. Hundreds of thousands of people would have died if we had followed that strategy, so I’m sorry, I was opposed to that, I still am and I am not going to apologize for it. There are times when people make crazy proposals on the basis of pseudoscience, and that needs to be called out.

BAIER: Right. But I guess it just follows this track with the early days downplaying or try to discredit the lab leak theory from Wuhan, why spend the time doing that when we’re talking about observation, description, extermination, and explanation? I mean, now it seems like the lab leak is a real possibility.

COLLINS: Well, Bret, I’m really sorry that the lab leak has become such a distraction for so many people, because, frankly, we still don’t know. There is no evidence really to say. Most of the scientific community, myself included, think that is a possibility but far more likely this was a natural way in which a virus left a bat, maybe traveled through some other species and got to humans, and there was no lab leak involved. We won’t know until — unless China decides to open up about this, which they have not done, and shame on them for that.

BAIER: Dr. Collins —

COLLINS: But this has been a huge distraction.

Transcript Link

Watch the latest video at foxnews.com

Francis Collins is making a strawman argument as to the justification for his political demand to undermine scientific opposition. The three scientists were not advocating to put vulnerable people at risk, or letting the virus just run through the population. They were arguing the severity of the NIH and CDC response. The lockdowns and mitigation effort, was disproportionate to the risk the virus presented.

The scale of overreaction -not only in the email- from the medical and scientific establishment to any counter opinion or criticism only points out how those who made these decisions were/are incapable of accepting criticism. That is a dangerous personality trait.

Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. Francis Collins are thin-skinned, unstable ideologues with visions of grandiosity. They have wreaked havoc on our nation and permeated a major crisis on the global stage. These are not mentally or emotionally stable people, and it shows.

These are people who needed a career operating in government systems and institutions, because they could never be successful in the private sector. They are devoid of skills needed outside academia and institutional structure. These are very disturbed minds who have allowed their power to influence their narcissistic self-image.

History will not look well upon Collins or Fauci any more than history reflects well upon Josef Mengele.

DVmBcWY.jpg
 
Top