GUNS/RLTD DOJ Creates New Center To Help Local Officials Apply ‘Red Flag’ Laws Against Certain Gun Owners

Kathy in FL

Administrator
_______________
DOJ Creates New Center To Help Local Officials Apply ‘Red Flag’ Laws Against Certain Gun Owners

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced on Saturday the creation of a new entity to train state and local officials on procedures to apply “red flag” laws that temporarily prevent certain individuals from owning a firearm.

The National Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO) Resource Center is an entity created under the DOJ’s Office of Justice Programs (OJP) that will both educate and assist local officials when they initiate legal proceedings to obtain “red flag” orders that rescind an individual’s right to bear arms based on the belief that they pose a risk of harm to themselves or others, according to the DOJ’s press release. The individuals to be trained are “law enforcement officials, prosecutors, attorneys, judges, clinicians, victim service and social service providers, community organizations, and behavioral health professionals.”

“The launch of the National Extreme Risk Protection Order Resource Center will provide our partners across the country with valuable resources to keep firearms out of the hands of individuals who pose a threat to themselves or others,” Attorney General Merrick Garland said in the press release. “The establishment of the Center is the latest example of the Justice Department’s work to use every tool provided by the landmark Bipartisan Safer Communities Act to protect communities from gun violence.”

Justice Department Launches the National Extreme Risk Protection Order Resource Center
: Justice Department Launches the National Extreme Risk Protection Order Resource Center pic.twitter.com/zUj0woxwrf
— U.S. Department of Justice (@TheJusticeDept) March 23, 2024
Red flag orders, or ERPOs, have previously been supported by gun control advocacy groups.

“Gun violence is a complex issue that requires comprehensive solutions. Extreme risk laws are an evidence-based tool that can help prevent many forms of gun violence tragedies before they ever occur — suicide, interpersonal violence, and mass shootings alike,” Brady: United Against Gun Violence, a non-profit organization that advocates for gun control, wrote on its website.

ERPOs are issued by state courts in civil proceedings to prevent persons from purchasing or possessing firearms should they be deemed likely to use them to harm themselves or others, the press release explains. Twenty-one states along with Washington, D.C. have passed such laws.

“OJP’s investment in ERPO programs demonstrates the Department’s commitment to addressing the gun violence crisis in the United States,” Assistant Attorney General Amy Solomon wrote in the press release. “This crisis cannot be solved at one level of government. We must use all of our resources and collaborate at the federal, state, and local levels to find innovative, evidence-based, and holistic solutions to help keep American communities safe.”

Measures such as ERPOs have been opposed by conservative groups, who argue that they are abused to deprive individuals of rights under the U.S. Constitution’s Second Amendment, which establishes that “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

“So-called ‘Red Flag’ orders, or Emergency Risk Protection Orders, are designed to empower the government to confiscate Americans’ firearms without due process of law,” the National Rifle Association’s Institute for Legislative Action wrote in 2022. “Aside from allowing run-of-the-mill malicious actors to indulge personal grudges against law-abiding gun owners, in the current politically-charged environment, these laws enable the government to target those with First Amendment-protected political views the government disfavors.”

The NRA did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
 

Publius

TB Fanatic
Yes the court ordered this and it's intended to keep mentally ill people from buying firearms and not for government red flags laws thats intended to take guns away from people they or someone does not like.
 
Last edited:

moldy

Veteran Member
Well if you let your state go “red flag” then you get what you asked for,sorry.
well, ya know, I"m the only one that votes in my state - so absolutely my fault. Tad bit of sarcasm there.

Recently, Colorado introduced a law to allow law enforcement officers to initiate M1 holds. This will allow them to dump the 'mentally ill' at the ER door. Most of the LEOs from what I've heard are not happy about this.
 

Buick Electra

TB2K Girls with Guns

Biden Justice Department Launches National “Red Flag” Center to Track Sketchy Gun Owners


March 23, 2024 | Sundance | 143 Comments

The DOJ has announced [SEE HERE] a national center to monitor and assist states with Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPO), otherwise known as “Red Flag” laws and procedures to monitor gun owners and confiscate firearms from sketchy owners.

According to the announcement, the intent is to help states remove dangerous firearms from people who are identified as “at risk” to perpetrate violence.

The launch of the National Extreme Risk Protection Order Resource Center will provide our partners across the country with valuable resources to keep firearms out of the hands of individuals who pose a threat to themselves or others,” said Attorney General Merrick B. Garland.

“ERPO laws, which are modeled off domestic violence protection orders, create a civil process allowing law enforcement, family members (in most states), and medical professionals or other groups (in some states) to petition a court to temporarily prohibit someone at risk of harming themselves or others from purchasing and possessing firearms for the duration of the order.”

[…] Through the Center and its newly launched website, states, local governments, law enforcement, prosecutors, attorneys, judges, clinicians, victim service providers, and behavioral health and other social service providers will have direct access to critical information that will enhance their ability to reduce firearm homicides and suicides. (read more)


With Johns Hopkins and the Bloomberg School of Public Health in control of the database, and with the Dept of Justice – which includes the FBI in full support, problematic white males will likely be identified as the gravest threat requiring immediate supervision. Be careful what opinions you post on social media.

From the Resource Center – “As of March 2024, 21 states and the District of Columbia have enacted ERPO laws. Though the names of these laws and the laws themselves vary by state, the process is similar for most petitioners. In all states, ERPOs are civil, not criminal, court orders. However, violation of an ERPO law may be a criminal offense depending on state law.

ERPOs temporarily prohibit a person from possessing or purchasing firearms and provide a process for the removal of firearms already in the person’s possession. The possession of a firearm is not required for an individual to be an ERPO respondent. An ERPO also temporarily prevents someone who is behaving dangerously or at risk of committing violence from purchasing and possessing firearms.” (Read More)


Always remember, in modern America words the leftists don’t like are considered violence. If you live in one of these 21 states, know your pronouns comrade citizen.

guns-things-that-make-you-go-hmmm.jpg
 

Buick Electra

TB2K Girls with Guns

rs657

Veteran Member
The National Red Flag Centers are probably the beginnings of a National Police Force. I remember that Obama said he wanted this and it should be as well equipped as the military and just as powerful. Similar to what their Fascists National Socialist German Workers' Party brethren did in Germany in the 1930s. Once the Socialist Fascists get a toe hold, you can kiss the local police control goodbye.
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
Yes the court ordered this and it's intended to keep mentally ill people from buying firearms and not for government red flags laws thats intended to take guns away from people they or someone does not like.

Yes, mentally ill. Like in those who attend church and think that some unseen, unproven entity can actually make a difference in their lives.

Sorry. Its Sunday. I shouldn't SARC like that today.

Dobbin
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed

“Did you really think we want those laws observed?" said Dr. Ferris. "We want them to be broken. You'd better get it straight that it's not a bunch of boy scouts you're up against... We're after power and we mean it... There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What's there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced or objectively interpreted – and you create a nation of law-breakers – and then you cash in on guilt. Now that's the system, Mr. Reardon, that's the game, and once you understand it, you'll be much easier to deal with.”​


Dobbin
 

Illini Warrior

Illini Warrior
"mentally ill" - as prescribed by a non-biased & non-prejudiced specialist doctor - not Old Doc Brown that wants to pacify some local family of certain influences - not some bought & sold "tell me what you want and pay cash $$$" insurance swindler - definitely not some clinic or ER doc with a personal agenda ....

with the DOJ and the current legalized persecution agenda - I can see a cross-referenced database targeting Biden problem people in the individual Red States >>> SSN database + Medicare/insurance files + voting register records + social media feed capture + ORG affiliations + FBI listings + state firearms registers
 

Voortrekker

Veteran Member
It's another plot to disarm the public so (((whomever))) can do their tyranny thing unopposed. Then all of the "security men" become counter-revolutionairies and are "red Flagged" themselves.
 

dstraito

TB Fanatic
Ok, let's do the thought police thing, lets prosecute those that commit 60 percent of the crimes, sounds like a statistical sure thing.
 
The National Red Flag Centers are probably the beginnings of a National Police Force. I remember that Obama said he wanted this and it should be as well equipped as the military and just as powerful. Similar to what their Fascists National Socialist German Workers' Party brethren did in Germany in the 1930s. Once the Socialist Fascists get a toe hold, you can kiss the local police control goodbye.
Ministry of DisArming the People
 

Luddite

Veteran Member
I envision an AI algorithm making that anonymous call to the red flag police.

You know, someone exhibiting wrongthink online.

Or buying otherwise legal substances together. Like several cleaning chemicals under most every sink in America. But also having a dangerous tendency to love freedom and common sense.
 

Blacula

Dark Roasted
You'd better have at least one stashed somewhere that's not on any property you own, along with ammo, spare mags, and a holster.
 

undead

Veteran Member
Yes the court ordered this and it's intended to keep mentally ill people from buying firearms and not for government red flags laws thats intended to take guns away from people they or someone does not like.
you are kinda full of shit
 

Publius

TB Fanatic
you are kinda full of shit

You may be right as the articles that first showed up and I read I cannot find and what I'm now seeing is completely counter to that. I wonder how they will deal with earlier court ruling on Red flag laws where someone accuses a family member or a wife's lawyer is filing paper work that involves a divorce for seizure of firearms the husband may own as if he actually committed a criminal act and all of it lacking due-process of law before they can do this taking of property.
I know a woman that fired a lawyer for doing that and the judge refused to undo that filing for seizure of of her soon to be ex-husband's firearms and I suggested she file a civil case against the judge and three days later that judge undid all that and returned the weapons real fast. The lawyer was acting on their own and so was the judge.
 

undead

Veteran Member
the Federal government has no interest in keeping guns out of the hands of the mentally ill, in fact it serves their purpose

what they really want is to keep guns out of the hands of their political enemies
 

The Cub

Behold, I am coming soon.
From 2013 . Indeed, the list is much longer today.....you know, those 'Christian Nationalists'.....those traditional Catholics.....and more:


72 Types Of Americans That Are Considered “Potential Terrorists” In Official Government Documents​


August 26, 2013 by Michael Snyder

Are you a conservative, a libertarian, a Christian or a gun owner? Are you opposed to abortion, globalism, Communism, illegal immigration, the United Nations or the New World Order? Do you believe in conspiracy theories, do you believe that we are living in the “end times” or do you ever visit alternative news websites (such as this one)? If you answered yes to any of those questions, you are a “potential terrorist” according to official U.S. government documents. At one time, the term “terrorist” was used very narrowly. The government applied that label to people like Osama bin Laden and other Islamic jihadists. But now the Obama administration is removing all references to Islam from terror training materials, and instead the term “terrorist” is being applied to large groups of American citizens. And if you are a “terrorist”, that means that you have no rights and the government can treat you just like it treats the terrorists that are being held at Guantanamo Bay. So if you belong to a group of people that is now being referred to as “potential terrorists”, please don’t take it as a joke. The first step to persecuting any group of people is to demonize them. And right now large groups of peaceful, law-abiding citizens are being ruthlessly demonized.


Below is a list of 72 types of Americans that are considered to be “extremists” and “potential terrorists” in official U.S. government documents. To see the original source document for each point, just click on the link. As you can see, this list covers most of the country…


1. Those that talk about “individual liberties”


2. Those that advocate for states’ rights


3. Those that want “to make the world a better place”


4. “The colonists who sought to free themselves from British rule”


5. Those that are interested in “defeating the Communists”


6. Those that believe “that the interests of one’s own nation are separate from the interests of other nations or the common interest of all nations”


7. Anyone that holds a “political ideology that considers the state to be unnecessary, harmful,or undesirable”


8. Anyone that possesses an “intolerance toward other religions”


9. Those that “take action to fight against the exploitation of the environment and/or animals”


10. “Anti-Gay”


11. “Anti-Immigrant”


12. “Anti-Muslim”


13. “The Patriot Movement”


14. “Opposition to equal rights for gays and lesbians”


15. Members of the Family Research Council


16. Members of the American Family Association


17. Those that believe that Mexico, Canada and the United States “are secretly planning to merge into a European Union-like entity that will be known as the ‘North American Union'”


18. Members of the American Border Patrol/American Patrol


19. Members of the Federation for American Immigration Reform


20. Members of the Tennessee Freedom Coalition


21. Members of the Christian Action Network


22. Anyone that is “opposed to the New World Order”


23. Anyone that is engaged in “conspiracy theorizing”


24. Anyone that is opposed to Agenda 21


25. Anyone that is concerned about FEMA camps


26. Anyone that “fears impending gun control or weapons confiscations”


27. The militia movement


28. The sovereign citizen movement


29. Those that “don’t think they should have to pay taxes”


30. Anyone that “complains about bias”


31. Anyone that “believes in government conspiracies to the point of paranoia”


32. Anyone that “is frustrated with mainstream ideologies”


33. Anyone that “visits extremist websites/blogs”


34. Anyone that “establishes website/blog to display extremist views”


35. Anyone that “attends rallies for extremist causes”


36. Anyone that “exhibits extreme religious intolerance”


37. Anyone that “is personally connected with a grievance”


38. Anyone that “suddenly acquires weapons”


39. Anyone that “organizes protests inspired by extremist ideology”


40. “Militia or unorganized militia”


41. “General right-wing extremist”


42. Citizens that have “bumper stickers” that are patriotic or anti-U.N.


43. Those that refer to an “Army of God”


44. Those that are “fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation)”


45. Those that are “anti-global”


46. Those that are “suspicious of centralized federal authority”


47. Those that are “reverent of individual liberty”


48. Those that “believe in conspiracy theories”


49. Those that have “a belief that one’s personal and/or national ‘way of life’ is under attack”


50. Those that possess “a belief in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in paramilitary preparations and training or survivalism”


51. Those that would “impose strict religious tenets or laws on society (fundamentalists)”


52. Those that would “insert religion into the political sphere”


53. Anyone that would “seek to politicize religion”


54. Those that have “supported political movements for autonomy”


55. Anyone that is “anti-abortion”


56. Anyone that is “anti-Catholic”


57. Anyone that is “anti-nuclear”


58. “Rightwing extremists”


59. “Returning veterans”


60. Those concerned about “illegal immigration”


61. Those that “believe in the right to bear arms”


62. Anyone that is engaged in “ammunition stockpiling”


63. Anyone that exhibits “fear of Communist regimes”


64. “Anti-abortion activists”


65. Those that are against illegal immigration


66. Those that talk about “the New World Order” in a “derogatory” manner


67. Those that have a negative view of the United Nations


68. Those that are opposed “to the collection of federal income taxes”


69. Those that supported former presidential candidates Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin and Bob Barr


70. Those that display the Gadsden Flag (“Don’t Tread On Me”)


71. Those that believe in “end times” prophecies


72. Evangelical Christians


The groups of people in the list above are considered “problems” that need to be dealt with. In some of the documents referenced above, members of the military are specifically warned not to have anything to do with such groups.


We are moving into a very dangerous time in American history. You can now be considered a “potential terrorist” just because of your religious or political beliefs. Free speech is becoming a thing of the past, and we are rapidly becoming an Orwellian society that is the exact opposite of what our founding fathers intended.


Please pray for the United States of America. We definitely need it.


72 Types Of Americans That Are Considered “Potential Terrorists” In Official Government Documents – The Truth
 

et2

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Biden promised to destroy oil and coal … he did.
He ran on destroying the auto business as we knew it … he’s winning
He promised to destroy executive orders Trump had set protecting our borders … he did.
He promised to come after MAGA folk … he has and is
He promised abortions at will … he won
He‘s claimed white men and folk are the biggest existential threat to America … he is over and over
He promised to stop Trump anyway possible legally using the court system … he is


He promised to come after our guns … he is. SEE HIS PROGRESS … STEP BY STEP

He looks like a hero in the Commies eyes.
 

mistaken1

Has No Life - Lives on TB
So this wouldn't be such a concern if we could rely on the ATF, FBI, DHS et all to not have access to a secret DBF of who we are and what we own; pretty sure there’s a tab in the Work Book for Known Affiliations too.

But it's all for our protection and best interests, right?

Come on man, they are protecting 'our democracy'.
 
Top