CORONA Doctors Warn of Vaccine Damages in Patients: 'People Are Being Deceived

Jefferson1776

Inactive
Doctors Warn of Vaccine Damages in Patients: 'People Are Being Deceived'
Amy Mek December 30, 2021 (RAIR Foundation USA)
Doctors Warn of Vaccine Damages in Patients: 'People Are Being Deceived' (Video) - RAIR

1640959449140.png
They have had more deaths from this one shot since it has rolled out than they have in the last thirty years in VAERS reporting.
Candian Doctors Stephen Malthouse and Charles Hoffe are on a road trip across the country to raise awareness about the dangers of taking the vaccine. “The rollout of the vaccine is having a devastating effect on the population. This is the most dangerous vaccine ever rolled out,” Hoffe said. “And now they are coming for our children.”
More and more people are being injured every day from taking the “vaccines,” reports the doctors. Yet, despite the shocking numbers, most doctors are not reporting the injuries or even questioning the safety of the “vaccines.” The few medical professionals asking questions and expressing concern are ostracized and labeled as pushing “vaccine hesitancy.”
Vaccine Injuries
I now have ten patients in my small practice who are literally disabled after their first shot, revealed Dr. Hoffe.
Hoffe decided to investigate the cause of their vaccine injuries and found that microscopic blood clots were the culprit. The doctor said that these blood clots occur in 50 percent of people who get a corona jab.
According to the doctor, the blood clots also explain his patients’ neurological disorders and lung problems. “These stings cause permanent damage. And the damage gets bigger after every shot.”
Injuries Unreported
The reporting system for vaccine side effects of the American Centers for Disease Control, VAERS, counts almost one million confirmed side effects for the new Covid vaccines.
Doctor Malthouse explains that the number of cases registered with VAERS “has been shown only to represent 1% of what is happening in real life.” For example, there have been 20,000 deaths (almost 50% of them reported within the first 24 hours of the shot), 100,000 hospitalizations, and over 30,000 severely disabled people who are permanently unable to work. As a result, the actual number of people adversely impacted by the vaccines is more likely to be closer to 100 times these actual reported numbers.
Despite the shocking numbers of deaths and injuries, Dr. Malthouse is questioning why The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has ignored all of these red flags. The Doctor states,
They have had more deaths from this one shot since it has rolled out than they have in the last thirty years in VAERS reporting. And that is only 1%. So we can imagine what the real death rate is of the shot. It is astronomical; in fact, it is pretty much a vertical line since that shot has been rolled out.
Total Failure
The doctors hope that people realize that they have been misled and misinformed. “Clearly, these vaccines don’t work. In British Columbia, 90 percent of the population has been vaccinated, but the corona restrictions remain in place and are even being tightened. Therefore, the rollout of the vaccine has turned out to be a total failure.”
Watch the following interview by Press For Truth with Dr. Charles Hoffe and Dr. Stephen Malthouse:
Must See! Doctors Blow The Whistle On Vaccine Injuries!!! - Rumble
Amy Mek
Investigative Journalist: Banned in parts of Europe, Wanted by Islamic countries, Threatened by terror groups, Hunted by left-wing media, Smeared by Hollywood elites & Fake religious leaders.
 

Troke

On TB every waking moment
"..Hoffe decided to investigate the cause of their vaccine injuries and found that microscopic blood clots were the culprit. The doctor said that these blood clots occur in 50 percent of people who get a corona jab ...."

Hmmm! Is there a 50% death/disability rate in nursing homes that received vaccinations? Seems that would attract attention. Of course, being old folk, maybe nobody noticed? Maybe somebody ought to look.

I have a couple of relatives in Homes. Don't know if they were vaccinated but I expect they were. Sure no word from them about unusual health problems in their Homes.

I keep wondering if we don't have a quality control problem where some doses of vaccine are more deadly than others.
 

Blacknarwhal

Let's Go Brandon!
"..Hoffe decided to investigate the cause of their vaccine injuries and found that microscopic blood clots were the culprit. The doctor said that these blood clots occur in 50 percent of people who get a corona jab ...."

Hmmm! Is there a 50% death/disability rate in nursing homes that received vaccinations? Seems that would attract attention. Of course, being old folk, maybe nobody noticed? Maybe somebody ought to look.

I have a couple of relatives in Homes. Don't know if they were vaccinated but I expect they were. Sure no word from them about unusual health problems in their Homes.

I keep wondering if we don't have a quality control problem where some doses of vaccine are more deadly than others.

And with old folks it's probably much harder to tell the difference between dying FROM the jab and dying WITH the jab.
 

Mushroom

Opinionated Granny
Deception = Fraud = Liability = Massive class action lawsuits in the future
Maybe a Class action lawsuit against the .gov who approved, forced, and deceived to get us to take the shot against our will. Maybe if they can enlist enough people to sign up for it, they would get the idea we are pissed and won't take their bullying anymore. Something to consider especially when you remember that they all knew this was a bad vaccine/gene therapy..
I have had all of my vaccinations, my genes don't need any therapy. Not sure there are any couches small enough for that anyway..
 

TFergeson

Non Solum Simul Stare
Its a great summation, but none of this is new. We here on TB2K have been waving the flags on this since the vax launch last year. I hate to say it, but we are slowly being proven right, with everything. The only thing left outstanding is the 'max die off' many predicted. Are we going to see a parabolic curve or a hyperbolic curve? Either way, it is not going to be pretty.
 
Its a great summation, but none of this is new. We here on TB2K have been waving the flags on this since the vax launch last year. I hate to say it, but we are slowly being proven right, with everything. The only thing left outstanding is the 'max die off' many predicted. Are we going to see a parabolic curve or a hyperbolic curve? Either way, it is not going to be pretty.
It will be interesting. All I can do is help save a few near me, who were already red pilled. I won’t be enjoying the carnage, but there will be ITYS moments.
 

et2

Has No Life - Lives on TB
The vaccine science is suspect and faulty. Everything is manipulated to say what they want. Non stop propaganda campaign. Brain washing on a massive scale, every hour of the day, 24/7.

As the vaccine preacher says, it’s capitalism and it’s here to stay. It’s more than that!!
 
Let us not forget…
 

Cyclonemom

Veteran Member
"..Hoffe decided to investigate the cause of their vaccine injuries and found that microscopic blood clots were the culprit. The doctor said that these blood clots occur in 50 percent of people who get a corona jab ...."

Hmmm! Is there a 50% death/disability rate in nursing homes that received vaccinations? Seems that would attract attention. Of course, being old folk, maybe nobody noticed? Maybe somebody ought to look.

I have a couple of relatives in Homes. Don't know if they were vaccinated but I expect they were. Sure no word from them about unusual health problems in their Homes.

I keep wondering if we don't have a quality control problem where some doses of vaccine are more deadly than others.
Asking a valid question as I don't know......

How many in nursing homes are on blood thinners that may negate any clot formation from the jab?
 

danielboon

TB Fanatic
data%3A
1640978961392.png
 

rondaben

Veteran Member
Yeah, the really expensive thousand dollar a dose stuff.

(that's snark, if you missed it)
Kinda like Andrew Kaufmans nutrition consults for $1500-$2000 a pop. But if they force vaccinations he promises to tell you how to reverse the vaccine for free. Not now of course. Now you pay.

Same racket.
 

rondaben

Veteran Member
whats

how does it feel to be completely 100 percent batting 0 wrong all the time?
and why do you persist in this calamitous behavior?
do you enjoy the ridicule?i mean any attention is better than none,am i right?
wow.

It was a simple question. Why so defensive?

Is it supplements? Vaccine exemptions? Trips to the medicine lodge?
 

von Koehler

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Its a great summation, but none of this is new. We here on TB2K have been waving the flags on this since the vax launch last year. I hate to say it, but we are slowly being proven right, with everything. The only thing left outstanding is the 'max die off' many predicted. Are we going to see a parabolic curve or a hyperbolic curve? Either way, it is not going to be pretty.

Indeed. The main questions left for me is "How many will die? And what happens next to the survivors?"
 
What are they selling? Supplements?
how does it feel to be completely 100 percent batting 0 wrong all the time?
and why do you persist in this calamitous behavior?

do you enjoy the ridicule?
It was a simple question. Why so defensive?

Is it supplements? Vaccine exemptions? Trips to the medicine lodge?
Sociopathic "perspective" does jump out every now and again - pick the worst/most absurd "example," and attempt to club into submission those that disagree - doesn't really care about what you think, if it does not align with their amoral programming - "AI" (assisted) bot with a meat operator?

YMMV.


intothegoodnight
 
Last edited:

rondaben

Veteran Member
Sociopathic "perspective" does jump out every now and again - pick the worst/most absurd "example," and attempt to club into submission those that disagree - doesn't really care about what you think, if it does not align with their amoral programming - AI (assisted) bot with a meat operator?

YMMV.


intothegoodnight
Well the doc in question DOES sell exemptions. No price posted but does warn to "be mentally prepared for the invoice". Stir up enough fear and I'm sure it's great for business.

At least it looks like we agree Andrew kaufman is a bad example?
 

coalcracker

Veteran Member
18B2B714-3691-4996-A49D-82A62662D2A5.jpeg
Just the latest of many.
Of course, this could be anything, right?

“suddenly in her home”

I am seeing these in the local paper every week. Prior to Covid and the vaccine, these type deaths were very rare. She was only 50 years old.

Make the inference. Connect the dots. It is an extremely uncomfortable truth, but it is discernible.
 
Well the doc in question DOES sell exemptions. No price posted but does warn to "be mentally prepared for the invoice". Stir up enough fear and I'm sure it's great for business.

At least it looks like we agree Andrew kaufman is a bad example?
If you would think out a bit further regarding those that sell fear - what BETTER way for ALL of us to learn how to spot fear methods of profiting/motivating, which may be deeply entwined into our individual lives - an online inoculation/a discreet moment of personal epiphany, as it were?

THAT is one of the functions that the TB2K community serves up to the membership.


intothegoodnight
 

Cacheman

Ultra MAGA!
Let us not forget…
An article from April 9 2021, radiologists were seeing an increase in lymphadenopathy already in vaxxed patients....




pubs.rsna.org


@RadIC_Editor


pubs.rsna.org







COVID-19 Vaccination–related Lymphadenopathy: What To Be Aware Of
Bonnie N. Joe

13-16 minutes


Key Points

  • ■ With the rollout of mass COVID-19 vaccination across the world, vaccine-induced lymphadenopathy is an important side effect for clinicians, patients, and cancer researchers to be aware of.
  • ■ Vaccine-induced lymphadenopathy can present as a diagnostic dilemma for radiologists.
  • ■ Evolving imaging guidelines are needed to address management strategies of vaccine-induced lymphadenopathy in both the general population and high-risk oncology patients.
  • ■ Documentation of vaccination status is critical to decrease unnecessary biopsies and alleviate patient anxiety.
Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic has changed the landscape of society since February of 2020 with a significant and tragic impact on morbidity and mortality with 2.77 million deaths across the world and 548 087 deaths in the United States as of March 26, 2021. Leading scientific minds have brought us a glimmer of hope with the development of multiple vaccines that are currently being distributed throughout the world. With the mass rollout of vaccination, both prevention of COVID-19 infection and reduction in morbidity and mortality can be achieved with hopes of ending the pandemic. Since February 27, 2021, three COVID-19 vaccines have been authorized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for emergency use: the two-dose Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines and the most recently authorized single-dose Johnson and Johnson/Janssen adenovirus vector vaccine. Several other vaccines are in development or being distributed in other countries including those developed by Oxford-AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or AZD1222), Gamaleya Research Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology (Sputnik V), and the CanSinoBIO-Beijing Institute of Biotechnology (Convidicea or Ad5-nCoV). Through March 26, 2021, 526 million doses of vaccines have been distributed across the world.

With mass vaccination rollout, lymphadenopathy ipsilateral to the injected deltoid muscle has become an important manifestation of an immune response to be aware of as it may present as a diagnostic dilemma on cancer imaging studies. We write this editorial as a public service message at a time where other countries are starting mass vaccination programs with the goal of preventing unnecessary nodal biopsies and alleviating patient concern.

What Are the Side Effects of COVID-19 Vaccination?

The most common COVID-19 vaccine side effects include local injection site pain, fever, chills, myalgias, headache and fatigue, with resolution usually in a few days (1,2). However, palpable lymphadenopathy commonly involving the axilla as an immune response to vaccination may present a clinical diagnostic dilemma especially in persons with a history of malignancy. Patients may be concerned regarding lymphadenopathy as a sign of malignancy, especially persons with a prior oncologic history. This anxiety will only increase in patients with lymphadenopathy as widespread rollouts of vaccination continue. In addition, lymphadenopathy may be found incidentally on imaging examinations, such as routine screening or oncologic surveillance examinations, presenting a diagnostic dilemma for radiologists (Figure).


Images in a 69-year-old woman with a history of lung adenocarcinoma and recent left arm COVID-19 vaccination 3 days prior (first dose). (A) Axial images from chest CT show left axillary and subpectoral lymphadenopathy (arrows). (B) Comparison chest CT images from 1 year prior show normal left axillary lymph nodes.



Images in a 69-year-old woman with a history of lung adenocarcinoma and recent left arm COVID-19 vaccination 3 days prior (first dose). (A) Axial images from chest CT show left axillary and subpectoral lymphadenopathy (arrows). (B) Comparison chest CT images from 1 year prior show normal left axillary lymph nodes.

How Common Is Vaccine-induced Axillary Lymphadenopathy?

Although unilateral lymphadenopathy is a known side effect of vaccines, it is rarely reported with vaccines such as the bacillus Calmette–Guérin, influenza, and human papillomavirus vaccines (35). In a larger series examining 83 recipients of the influenza vaccine, four patients had unexpected fluorodeoxyglucose axillary node accumulations on imaging (5). In addition, lymph node uptake on nuclear medicine studies after vaccination has been shown by multiple studies.

This is in contrast with the two-dose approved COVID-19 vaccines in the United States, Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna, which both have higher reported rates of axillary swelling compared with prior vaccines.
This may be due to a higher immunogenic response to these mRNA vaccines, a type of vaccine that has not previously been approved for use. As a solicited adverse event in the Moderna clinical trials, axillary swelling or tenderness was reported in 11.6% of patients (5.0% placebo) after dose 1 and 16.0% (4.3% placebo) after dose 2 (1). While not solicited as an adverse event in the Pfizer trials, reports of lymphadenopathy from dose 1 through 30 days after dose 2 were imbalanced with notably more cases in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine group (64) versus the placebo group (6), which is plausibly related to vaccination (2). The true incidence of postvaccination lymphadenopathy may be higher given axillary swelling was only reported as an unsolicited adverse event. Incidence of axillary lymphadenopathy visible at imaging is likely higher as not all patients have clinical symptoms.

What Has Been Reported in the Literature So Far regarding COVID-19 Vaccine-related Lymphadenopathy?

As of March 2021, at least 20 articles have been published illustrating or discussing COVID-19 vaccine–related lymphadenopathy, with 18 of these articles published in imaging journals. The earliest publications occurred in the field of breast imaging, where vaccine-induced lymphadenopathy was cited as a cause of unilateral axillary lymphadenopathy. Other imaging subspecialities citing this side effect included nine articles in nuclear medicine, and one article in cardiothoracic imaging. In most publications so far, there has only been one or a very small number of patients reported on; one of the largest groups of patients reported on is 23 patients with axillary adenopathy who had undergone breast imaging (6). Journals which have published on this subject include Radiology, American Journal of Roentgenology, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Clinical Nuclear Medicine, and Journal of the American College of Radiology (JACR). The majority of these articles reported lymphadenopathy as a side effect after the two-dose COVID-19 Pfizer or Moderna vaccines with two recent articles citing vaccine-induced lymphadenopathy with the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine, currently only given as one dose in the United Kingdom, with the second dose planned for delayed administration. The location of the lymphadenopathy was primarily axillary with four articles reporting cervical lymphadenopathy. The lymphadenopathy can be visualized on multiple modalities with most published cases demonstrated on US, followed by PET, MRI, mammography, and CT.

What Are the Current Imaging Guidelines Related to Vaccine-induced Axillary Lymphadenopathy?

The Society of Breast Imaging (SBI) was the first imaging society to propose guidelines addressing axillary lymphadenopathy seen on imaging (7), with the Canadian Society of Breast Imaging (CSBI) endorsing the SBI recommendations. There have now been multiple publications suggesting guidelines for unilateral axillary lymphadenopathy with focus on different modalities or oncologic subspecialities. We summarize these below divided in terms of different phases of care.

Clinical History

Vaccination dates, injection site/laterality, and vaccine type should be documented on patient intake forms or electronic medical record (7).

Scheduling Examinations

To mitigate the diagnostic dilemma of vaccine-induced lymphadenopathy, the SBI recommends that patients should “consider scheduling screening exams prior to the first dose of a COVID-19 vaccination or 4-6 weeks following the second dose of a COVID-19 vaccination” (7). This recommendation has been followed by a similar guideline published in Radiology from a multidisciplinary panel from oncologic centers, recommending for nonurgent indications such as routine surveillance, screening, or staging imaging to be scheduled prior to vaccination or to postpone imaging “at least 6 weeks after final vaccination dose” (8). McIntosh et al also (9) suggested performing PET/CT “at least 2 weeks after vaccination in patients with a cancer for which interpretation is anticipated to be potentially impacted by the vaccination, though optimally 4-6 weeks after vaccination.” However, like other imaging examinations, if there is an urgent clinical indication such as treatment planning, active treatment monitoring, or assessment of new symptoms or potential complications, imaging should not be delayed, regardless of vaccination status.

An additional strategy to mitigate confounding findings would be to administer COVID-19 vaccinations “on the side contralateral to the primary cancer” (8).

Incidentally Detected Unilateral Lymphadenopathy on Imaging

For subclinical unilateral lymphadenopathy detected on imaging, vaccination history including injection site and date is now a key piece of clinical information to obtain. In cases of unilateral axillary lymphadenopathy on screening mammography, the SBI recommends a BI-RADS 0 designation to bring the patient back for assessment of the ipsilateral breast and additional documentation of medical and vaccination history (7). After an otherwise negative diagnostic workup, and if a COVID-19 vaccine was given on the ipsilateral side in the past 4 weeks, a BI-RADS 3 (probably benign) assessment is then assigned with consideration for a short-term follow-up in 4–12 weeks after the second vaccination dose. If lymphadenopathy persists at follow-up, then consider a BI-RADS 4 (suspicious) assessment with biopsy to exclude malignancy. As these recommendations were first announced in January 2021 based on very early experience with COVID-19 vaccinations, they are necessarily meant to be conservative. In an update (March 9, 2021), the SBI notes that individual practices may wish to establish their own guidelines based on local expertise and resources.

A different approach was suggested by a recent publication in JACR proposing use of “BI-RADS 2 benign” assessment with clinical follow-up for isolated unilateral lymphadenopathy after recent COVID-19 vaccination in the ipsilateral arm (10). This is consistent with the American College of Radiology BI-RADS recommendations for unilateral lymphadenopathy in the setting of a known inflammatory cause (10). In comparison with the more conservative SBI recommendations, this “pragmatic” approach would result in fewer follow-up examinations.
In terms of management of clinically evident postvaccination lymphadenopathy, the multidisciplinary panel recommended “observing for at least 6 weeks until resolution before referring for diagnostic imaging evaluation or biopsy of the nodes” (8). The multidisciplinary panel also recommended “expectant management strategy without default follow-up imaging” in patients whom pretest probability of adenopathy is much more likely due to vaccination rather than malignancy. In higher-risk situations, either a short-term imaging follow-up with US and/or tissue diagnosis can be considered, especially in patients with a high-risk oncologic history (eg, ipsilateral breast or head/neck cancer, melanoma, or lymphoma) (8). The expected duration of postvaccination lymphadenopathy is not yet determined.

What Are the Implications for Patients?

Widespread patient education regarding vaccine-induced lymphadenopathy is needed, especially as this may be mistaken as a sign of malignancy. Imaging societies, clinicians, and news media outlets should spread awareness to educate the public regarding this side effect to minimize patient anxiety. When vaccines are administered, side effects such as axillary swelling should be highlighted and normalized as an immune response initiated by the vaccine. Patients should be aware of the best times to schedule routine imaging examinations with more infographics such as the SBI mammography recommendations for women receiving the COVID-19 vaccine being widely distributed. In patients with palpable lymphadenopathy after vaccination, another suggestion may be to proceed with clinical follow-up by a clinician or the patient themselves rather than imaging, resulting in cost-savings to the system. Care should also be taken to ensure clinical and/or imaging follow-up for those with lymphadenopathy that does not resolve, those with potentially causative malignancies (such as breast or head/neck cancer, lymphoma, or melanoma), and those with additional sites of lymphadenopathy.

Disclosures of Conflicts of Interest: W.T. Activities related to the present article: trainee editorial board member of Radiology: Imaging Cancer. Activities not related to the present article: disclosed no relevant relationships. Other relationships: disclosed no relevant relationships. D.S.G. Activities related to the present article: associate editor of Radiology: Imaging Cancer. Activities not related to the present article: disclosed no relevant relationships. Other relationships: disclosed no relevant relationships. B.N.J. Activities related to the present article: deputy editor of Radiology: Imaging Cancer. Activities not related to the present article: institution receives grant from Kheiron Medical Technologies; institution receives payment for lecture from National Diagnostic Imaging Symposium CME course; author receives royalties from UpToDate. Other relationships: disclosed no relevant relationships.

Authors declared no funding for this work.

Received: Apr 1 2021
Revision requested: Apr 1 2021
Revision received: Apr 2 2021
Accepted: Apr 8 2021
Published online: Apr 09 2021
 
Last edited:
Top