WAR CHINA THREATENS TO INVADE TAIWAN

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Posted for fair use......

World News

A New Front in the Info War: China’s Bounty on Taiwan’s PsyOps Unit​


Chinese police announced a reward of $1,400 for information on 18 individuals they claim are Taiwanese military officers involved in spreading "separatist" messages.

Newsroom
October 11, 2025

Chinese police announced a reward of $1,400 for information on 18 individuals they claim are Taiwanese military officers involved in spreading “separatist” messages, following Taiwan’s promise to strengthen its defenses. China sees Taiwan as part of its territory, despite Taiwan’s government rejecting this stance. The police in Xiamen identified these individuals as key members of Taiwan’s psychological warfare unit, responsible for disinformation, intelligence gathering, and propaganda.

The Xiamen security bureau stated these individuals have allegedly incited separatist activities through various means, including smear campaigns and misleading content. Taiwan’s defense ministry responded, labeling the accusations as an attempt by an authoritarian regime to disrupt Taiwanese society and undermine its government. It emphasized the commitment of military personnel to national security and the public’s safety.

The wanted notice may have limited impact, as Taiwanese intelligence officers do not visit China, and China’s legal authority does not extend to Taiwan. Taiwan’s President Lai Ching-te recently vowed to enhance defenses and urged China to cease threats. In June, China had previously offered a similar reward for Taiwanese military hackers, which Taiwan dismissed as intimidation.

With information from Reuters
 

jward

passin' thru
Taiwan Security Monitor
@TaiwanMonitor

NEW: Today, China’s Maritime Safety Administration has announced that the PLA will be conducting "military training" in the waters near the disputed Scarborough Shoal.

Navigation warning 粤航警355/25 restricts entry into the area between 12:00 and 19:00 tomorrow, October 17th.
 

jward

passin' thru
Walter Bloomberg
@DeItaone
·
42m


CHINESE DEFENSE MINISTRY WARNS U.S. AGAINST PERILOUS ATTEMPTS TO ARM TAIWAN REGION - XINHUA
Jaime Ocon 歐海美
@JaimeOcon1
Oct 20

NEW: Taiwan Harpoon Coast Defense Missile Update

At an LY meeting, it was reveiled that Taiwan will receive the first batch of 100 Harpoon Coastal Defense Systems and 400 RGM-84L-4 Harpoon Block II surface-launched anti-ship missiles by the official launch of the "Littoral Combatant Command" on Jan. 1, 2026.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Hummm...........

Posted for fair use.......

Trump on China: Is a Taiwan deal in the works?​

By Bill Gertz - The Washington Times - Wednesday, October 22, 2025

President Trump disclosed this week that talks with China could result in some type of deal on Taiwan, an unofficial U.S. ally facing the prospect of a Chinese military takeover.

Asked about reports that China is pressing him not to support formal Taiwan independence in exchange for a trade deal, Mr. Trump told reporters: “I’m not going to talk about that.”

Mr. Trump said during a press conference Monday with Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese that he will address the issue in a couple of weeks during a visit to South Korea, where he is scheduled to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping.

“We’re going to be talking about a lot of things. I assume that’s going to be one of the things, but I’m not going to talk about that now,” he said of the possible Taiwan deal.

Taiwan remains a major flash point in U.S.-China relations as China’s military continues to conduct aggressive operations that U.S. military leaders have said are rehearsals for an invasion.


A Chinese Communist Party official, Wu Xinbo, said in July that Mr. Trump must first declare that the U.S. does not support formal independence for Taiwan as a concession before a summit in China can be held.

China views Taiwan as its territory and has accused the U.S. of supporting formal Taiwan independence. The U.S., however, has never recognized mainland sovereignty over the island democracy and views its legal status as unresolved.

TIMESMYView all
Mr. Trump said Monday that he will meet with Mr. Xi at the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation meeting set to begin Oct. 31, and that he plans to travel to China early next year.

Trade talks between Washington and Beijing stalled earlier this month after China announced restrictions on rare earth mineral exports.

Mr. Trump then said he would impose an additional 100% tariff on Chinese goods, in addition to the more than 55% tariff already in place.

The Trump administration also is considering restrictions on civilian aircraft parts for China’s hundreds of Boeing aircraft as part of the ongoing trade dispute, Mr. Trump said.

Mr. Trump said China has been “very respectful” and is paying large amounts of money in tariffs. “China’s paying 55% and a potential 155% come Nov. 1, unless we make a deal, and I’m meeting with President Xi,” he said. He added, “we have a very good relationship.”

“We worked out a very fair trade deal with Japan; we worked out a very fair deal with South Korea, … and I expect we’ll probably work out a very fair deal with President Xi of China … It’s going to be very exciting, and I think we’re going to work out something that’s good for both countries,” he said.

Asked about comments by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who said in a speech in Singapore in May that the risk of war with China is increasing and that a Taiwan invasion could take place by 2027, Mr. Trump downplayed the danger.

The three-nation agreement between the U.S., Australia and Britain to build nuclear submarines for Australia and base U.S. and British submarines in Australia beginning in 2027 will be a deterrent to conflict with China, he said.

“But I don’t think we’re going to need it. I think we’ll be just fine with China. China doesn’t want to do that,” he said.

The U.S. is the world’s strongest military power with the best equipment and weapons, he said.

“And nobody’s going to mess with that. And I don’t see that at all with President Xi. I think we’re going to get along very well as it pertains to Taiwan and others,” he said.

Taiwan, for Mr. Xi, is probably “the apple of his eye” but “I don’t see anything happening” in terms of a conflict, Mr. Trump said.

“We have a very good trade relationship. We’re going to have a very good, I think, when we leave South Korea, it could be wrong, but I think we’ll end up with a very strong trade deal. Both of us will be happy. I don’t see that happening,” he said of a war.

Mr. Trump also noted that China is facing severe problems and said additional U.S. tariffs could cripple its economy.

At a certain point, as tariffs are boosted to 155% or more, “it’s almost like saying we don’t want to do business with you,” Mr. Trump said. “And if they don’t do business with us, I think China’s in big trouble,” he said.

“I’ll be honest with you … I don’t know that they even make it. I really do. I believe that they’re in big trouble, and I don’t want them to be in big trouble.”

Trump trolls Australia’s ambassador

Kevin Rudd, Australia’s ambassador to the United States, took a major political beating this week from President Trump over his past comments.

Mr. Trump was asked by a reporter if he had any concerns about the administration of Australian President Anthony Albanese, in light of Mr. Rudd’s remarks.

“I don’t know anything about him. If you say bad, then maybe he’d like to apologize. I really don’t know,” Mr. Trump said.

The president then turned to Mr. Albanese and asked whether the ambassador had said something bad, to which Mr. Albanese joked: “Don’t tell me, I don’t want to know.”

Mr. Trump then asked where Mr. Rudd was and whether he was still working for Mr. Albanese.

Sitting across the table in the White House Cabinet Room, Mr. Rudd was spotted and then asked by the president if he has said critical things about him.

“Before I took this position, Mr. President,” said Mr. Rudd, a former prime minister.

“I don’t like you either, and I probably never will,” Mr. Trump said.

Readers of Inside the Ring will note that last year, Mr. Rudd took issue with critics quoted in a column who said he has long held pro-China views, a position he denied in a letter to the editor.

In response, retired Navy Capt. Jim Fanell strongly disagreed. “For over two decades, Kevin Rudd has demonstrated his pro-[China] leanings,” said Capt. Fanell, a former director of intelligence for the Pacific Fleet.

“The empirical record is clear, Kevin Rudd is a ’friend of China,’ and he has consistently been a proponent of ’studying’ China while never completing his research with objective assessments about how the PRC’s has become increasingly belligerent on the world stage despite decades of unconstrained and unaccountable engagement from the West,” Capt. Fanell said.

Guermantes Lailari, a retired Air Force foreign area officer who is currently a visiting fellow at Taiwan’s National Chengchi University, said Mr. Rudd is well known among diplomats and academics for holding pro-China positions, especially related to trade.

“One academic reminded me that when the Quad [U.S., India, Japan and Australia] leaders officially met in 2007, Beijing was angered by its exclusion and then-Prime Minister Kevin Rudd withdrew Australia from the Quad after the first meeting,” Mr. Lailari said.

Mr. Rudd’s pro-Beijing stance was highlighted last year when it was revealed he had lobbied the U.S. government not to get involved or sponsor a Pacific island policing initiative that would help coordinate anti-crime efforts among the islands, apparently fearing the initiative would upset Beijing.

Chinese communist, PLA playing cards a hit

One of the hottest tickets in military and policy circles focused on China affairs these days are four sets of playing cards featuring senior Chinese Communist Party leaders and People’s Liberation Army generals and admirals, military weapons and organizations.

The decks are the work of the Air Force’s specialty think tank, the China Aerospace Studies Institute. The think tank regularly produces eye-opening reports and assessments on all things related to the Chinese military, especially its air and space forces.

The cards come in four decks with one deck of leaders making Chinese President Xi Jinping the ace of spades. The other decks are divided into CCP and PLA equipment, services and concepts and organizations.

They harken back to the Defense Intelligence Agency’s 2003 deck of playing cards featuring most-wanted Iraqis sought by the military. As of January, all but four of the 52 most wanted, including ace of spades Saddam Hussein, have been killed or captured.

The 54 CCP and PLA leaders — among them two jokers — are shown with photos and positions in a 2024 deck that includes many of the numerous high-ranking admirals and generals who have been purged under Mr. Xi’s ongoing loyalty and anti-corruption drive.

Among those in the deck that have been ousted are PLA Gen. He Weidong, the six of spades, and the ousted vice chairman of the Central Military Commission, the CCP organ that controls the military. Adm. Miao Hua, the CMC’s chief ideologist, is the four of spades. Both were formally expelled from the CCP this week. Fired Defense Minister Dong Jun is on the two of spades.

The two jokers in the deck are Gen. Wang Chunning, commander of the People’s Armed Police, and Gen. Zhang Hongbing, the PAP political commissar.

The equipment deck includes the PLA’s long-range nuclear-capable bomber, the H-6, as the ace of spades and the Type 003 aircraft carrier, its third flattop, as the ace of hearts. The ace of clubs is the silo-based nuclear missile the DF-5A/B/C, and the J-20 stealth fighter is the king of spades.

The services and concepts deck features the PLA air force as the ace of spades along with 53 other key military organizations and functions, including the three of spades as “Xi Jinping Thought,” the personal communist ideology of Mr. Xi centered on himself as the “core.”

The PLA’s organizations deck is made up of more than 50 key military units and organizations, including the Eastern Theater Command, as the four of hearts. That command is closely watched as the military forces that would be the lead in any future invasion of Taiwan.



• Contact Bill Gertz on X @BillGertz.

• Bill Gertz can be reached at bgertz@washingtontimes.com.


Comments 4
 

danielboon

TB Fanatic
@EndGameWW3
·
31m


China-Taiwan...
Quote







Chinese Embassy in US

@ChineseEmbinUS
·
3h
There is but one China in the world. #Taiwan is an inalienable part of China's territory. China Must Be and Will Be Reunified. x.com/SpoxCHNinUS/st…
 

jward

passin' thru
Mario Nawfal
@MarioNawfal

WAR SEC HEGSETH: OUR POSITION ON TAIWAN REMAINS UNCHANGED

"Our position on Taiwan remains unchanged, and President Trump has said that too.

But the conversation was constructive and candid. I think it’s important, military to military, that we have that relationship.

The tone was set at the top: President Trump has engaged and has a great relationship with Chairman Xi, and Admiral Dong, and I believe we should have the same.

Did we agree on everything? No.

Did we disagree on some things? Sure.

But that kind of constructive conversation, I think, leads to better outcomes. It was a good meeting."

Source: @SecWar, @DOWResponse
 

jward

passin' thru
:hmm:

US Homeland Security News
@defense_civil25
Nov 1

Update: President Trump is preparing to declare US recognition for Taiwan Independence from China. Trump may make the declaration later this month.
 

jward

passin' thru
Mario Nawfal
@MarioNawfal
2h

TRUMP ON TAIWAN: “XI KNOWS THE CONSEQUENCES”

“He never brought it up because he understands it - and he understands it very well.

I don’t want to give away, I can’t give away my secrets.

I don’t want to be one of these guys that tells you exactly what’s going to happen if something happens.

They understand what’s going to happen. And he has openly said, and his people have openly said at meetings, we would never do anything while Trump is president.

Because they know the consequences.”

Source: @realDonaldTrump on 30 Minutes
rt 1 11s
View: https://twitter.com/MarioNawfal/status/1985009633606705265
 

jward

passin' thru
abcnews.go.com

Trump says China's Xi told him he won't move on Taiwan during Republican's term​


Trump says Chinese President Xi Jinping has given him assurances.
ByAAMER MADHANI Associated Press

November 2, 2025, 11:15 AM

WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. -- President Donald Trump says that Chinese President Xi Jinping has given him assurances that Beijing would take no action toward its long-stated goal of unifying Taiwan with mainland China while the Republican leader is in office.
Trump said that the long-contentious issue of Taiwan did not come up in his talks with Xi on Thursday in South Korea that largely focused on U.S.-China trade tensions. But the U.S. leader expressed certainty that China would not take action on Taiwan, while he's in office.

“He has openly said, and his people have openly said at meetings, ‘We would never do anything while President Trump is president,’ because they know the consequences,” Trump said in an excerpt of an interview with the CBS' program “60 Minutes” that aired Sunday.
U.S. officials have long been concerned about the possibility of China using military force against Taiwan, the self-ruled island democracy claimed by Beijing as part of its territory.

The 1979 Taiwan Relations Act, which has governed U.S. relations with the island, does not require the U.S. to step in militarily if China invades but makes it American policy to ensure Taiwan has the resources to defend itself and to prevent any unilateral change of status by Beijing.

Asked if he would order U.S. forces to defend Taiwan if China attacked, Trump demurred. The United States, both Republican and Democratic administrations, have maintained a policy of “strategic ambiguity” on Taiwan — trying not to tip their hands on whether the U.S. would come to the island's aid in such a scenario.

Popular Reads​


“You’ll find out if it happens, and he understands the answer to that,” Trump said of Xi.
The Chinese embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The White House also did not provide further details about when Xi or Chinese officials have conveyed to Trump that military action on Taiwan was off-the-table for the duration of the Republican's presidency.
The "60 Minutes" interview was taped on Friday at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida. It marked Trump's first appearance on the show since he settled a lawsuit this summer with CBS News over the newsmagazine’s interview with Kamala Harris.
The rest of the interview is scheduled to air later Sunday.

 

jward

passin' thru
asiatimes.com

US-China war will come down to protecting or destroying Guam​



US forces on full display at Guam's Andersen Air Force Base. Image: Facebook Screengrab / Andersen Air Force Base

The Pacific island of Guam is one of America’s most strategically important overseas territories, holding some of the US Air Force’s most critical military assets and staging many of its most crucial operations in the Indo-Pacific and beyond.
As such, Guam’s strategic positioning and prominence to US force projection make the island a prime target for key Asian adversaries such as China and North Korea. Both Beijing and Pyongyang have recently developed ballistic missile capabilities specifically to be able to reach and penetrate Guam’s defenses.
To shield Guam from these rising threats, Washington has finalized plans for an Enhanced Integrated Air and Missile Defense (EIAMD) system to protect the island. By fully converting Guam into a forward-operating base, the Pentagon can use EIAMD to combat rising threats in the Indo-Pacific while continuing to bolster its regional assets.

A shield named EIAMD

The EIAMD is built to serve as a multi-layered air defense system. Plans for better fortifying Guam have been ongoing since at least August 2022, when the US Missile Defense Agency’s (MDA) top leadership provided details of upgrades to protect the island’s forward assets.
Under the plan, Guam will be covered by a 360-layered EIAMD, with 16 locations on the island used for various batteries and interceptors. Both the US Army and MDA were awarded the contract to develop and deploy the US$8 billion EIAMD to Guam.

The Aegis, Standard Missile 3 and six missile interceptors (SM-3 & SM-6) will reportedly be incorporated into the system.
Along with various missile interceptors, the Pentagon is considering deploying six radar systems to help track and plot ballistic missile interceptions. According to the Arms Control Association, EIAMD’s implementation will require 400 construction contractors and an additional 2,300 permanent and civilian personnel to operate the system.
Supplementing Aegis within EIAMD, the US Army and MDA plan on including the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD), the Typhon Mid-Range Capability System (MRC) and the Enduring Shield Indirect Fire Protection System. Deploying the various systems will help support the lower layers of Guam’s air defenses.

In a May 2023 article, Asia Times noted that Guam would also receive a disaggregated Aegis Ashore system, which could be installed at Anderson Air Force Base. Furthermore, Guam has strategic topography, from which interceptors could be well fired.
Despite the numerous systems that can supplement Guam’s defense, integration will pose many challenges. For example, integrating key sensor fusion across the different domains of each missile defense system will be needed to keep EIAMD in sync.
Guam’s strategic positioning allows for rapid reinforcements if any conflict were to break out in the Indo-Pacific, including over Taiwan, as Guam is situated only a few thousand kilometers away from key allies and American military locations in Japan, South Korea, the Philippines and Australia.

Guam’s Anderson Air Force Base is crucial for maintaining US strike packages and capabilities. B1 Lancers and B2 Spirit Bombers are stationed there for critical missions, including US military operations in the Middle East during the spring and summer of 2025. Anderson’s runways are modified to support all aircraft in the US military’s inventory.
At the same time, Guam is the central hub for supplementing US naval fleets such as the Fifth and Seventh in their areas of operations in the Indian and Pacific Oceans, respectively. The Defense Logistics Agency’s regional headquarters is also located in Guam to oversee logistical operations in the Asian Pacific.
The island is also home to Naval Base Guam, along with a Marine Corps base known as Camp Blaz. Currently, 22,000 military personnel, contractors and civilian dependents are located on the island, with stated plans to increase numbers by 50% to 33,000 by fiscal year 2027.

EIAMD vs China

In a potential conflict with China, American wargame planners have calculated that Beijing’s growing ballistic missile arsenal will heavily target Guam.
The People’s Liberation Army Rocket Force (PLARF) would likely utilize long-range Dongfeng (DF) ballistic missiles to target military bases in the region, especially those located on Guam. The PLARF would almost certainly fire the Ying-Ji (YJ) 21 hypersonic missile and DF-27 at Guam’s crucial military assets.

For Chinese ally North Korea, its strategic rocket force (KPASF) could deploy the Hwasong-15, the Hwasong-17 and as many as 20 different types of ballistic missiles against US forces in Guam.
The Hwasong-15 and Hwasong-17 are both capable of delivering nuclear weapons and can reach the continental US. US military planners would have time to counter Hwasong-type missiles as they are not perfected to re-enter the atmosphere.

Guam’s EAIMD is thus a much-needed layered air defense system to protect Guam’s critical assets. While China and North Korea’s ballistic missile capabilities are improving, so too are America’s defenses for a potential battle of seismic implications and consequences for the Indo-Pacific.
Julian McBride is a defense analyst and contributing editor at 19FortyFive.


US-China war will come down to protecting or destroying Guam - Asia Times
 

jward

passin' thru
Square profile picture
Visegrád 24
@visegrad24

BREAKING:

The Pentagon has approved a $330 million sale to Taiwan of spare and repair parts, consumables, accessories, and support services for F-16, C-130, and Indigenous Defense Fighter (IDF) aircraft.

It will be the first arms-related transaction with Taiwan in Trump's second term.

Taiwan's Ministry of National Defense says the deal will help sustain its air force amid China's "gray-zone" incursions and military pressure.

The aligns with U.S. commitments under the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive arms, despite Beijing's objections and increasingly aggressive posture against all its neighbours in the South China Sea.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
asiatimes.com

US-China war will come down to protecting or destroying Guam​



US forces on full display at Guam's Andersen Air Force Base. Image: Facebook Screengrab / Andersen Air Force Base

The Pacific island of Guam is one of America’s most strategically important overseas territories, holding some of the US Air Force’s most critical military assets and staging many of its most crucial operations in the Indo-Pacific and beyond.
As such, Guam’s strategic positioning and prominence to US force projection make the island a prime target for key Asian adversaries such as China and North Korea. Both Beijing and Pyongyang have recently developed ballistic missile capabilities specifically to be able to reach and penetrate Guam’s defenses.
To shield Guam from these rising threats, Washington has finalized plans for an Enhanced Integrated Air and Missile Defense (EIAMD) system to protect the island. By fully converting Guam into a forward-operating base, the Pentagon can use EIAMD to combat rising threats in the Indo-Pacific while continuing to bolster its regional assets.

A shield named EIAMD

The EIAMD is built to serve as a multi-layered air defense system. Plans for better fortifying Guam have been ongoing since at least August 2022, when the US Missile Defense Agency’s (MDA) top leadership provided details of upgrades to protect the island’s forward assets.
Under the plan, Guam will be covered by a 360-layered EIAMD, with 16 locations on the island used for various batteries and interceptors. Both the US Army and MDA were awarded the contract to develop and deploy the US$8 billion EIAMD to Guam.

The Aegis, Standard Missile 3 and six missile interceptors (SM-3 & SM-6) will reportedly be incorporated into the system.
Along with various missile interceptors, the Pentagon is considering deploying six radar systems to help track and plot ballistic missile interceptions. According to the Arms Control Association, EIAMD’s implementation will require 400 construction contractors and an additional 2,300 permanent and civilian personnel to operate the system.
Supplementing Aegis within EIAMD, the US Army and MDA plan on including the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD), the Typhon Mid-Range Capability System (MRC) and the Enduring Shield Indirect Fire Protection System. Deploying the various systems will help support the lower layers of Guam’s air defenses.

In a May 2023 article, Asia Times noted that Guam would also receive a disaggregated Aegis Ashore system, which could be installed at Anderson Air Force Base. Furthermore, Guam has strategic topography, from which interceptors could be well fired.
Despite the numerous systems that can supplement Guam’s defense, integration will pose many challenges. For example, integrating key sensor fusion across the different domains of each missile defense system will be needed to keep EIAMD in sync.
Guam’s strategic positioning allows for rapid reinforcements if any conflict were to break out in the Indo-Pacific, including over Taiwan, as Guam is situated only a few thousand kilometers away from key allies and American military locations in Japan, South Korea, the Philippines and Australia.

Guam’s Anderson Air Force Base is crucial for maintaining US strike packages and capabilities. B1 Lancers and B2 Spirit Bombers are stationed there for critical missions, including US military operations in the Middle East during the spring and summer of 2025. Anderson’s runways are modified to support all aircraft in the US military’s inventory.
At the same time, Guam is the central hub for supplementing US naval fleets such as the Fifth and Seventh in their areas of operations in the Indian and Pacific Oceans, respectively. The Defense Logistics Agency’s regional headquarters is also located in Guam to oversee logistical operations in the Asian Pacific.
The island is also home to Naval Base Guam, along with a Marine Corps base known as Camp Blaz. Currently, 22,000 military personnel, contractors and civilian dependents are located on the island, with stated plans to increase numbers by 50% to 33,000 by fiscal year 2027.

EIAMD vs China

In a potential conflict with China, American wargame planners have calculated that Beijing’s growing ballistic missile arsenal will heavily target Guam.
The People’s Liberation Army Rocket Force (PLARF) would likely utilize long-range Dongfeng (DF) ballistic missiles to target military bases in the region, especially those located on Guam. The PLARF would almost certainly fire the Ying-Ji (YJ) 21 hypersonic missile and DF-27 at Guam’s crucial military assets.

For Chinese ally North Korea, its strategic rocket force (KPASF) could deploy the Hwasong-15, the Hwasong-17 and as many as 20 different types of ballistic missiles against US forces in Guam.
The Hwasong-15 and Hwasong-17 are both capable of delivering nuclear weapons and can reach the continental US. US military planners would have time to counter Hwasong-type missiles as they are not perfected to re-enter the atmosphere.

Guam’s EAIMD is thus a much-needed layered air defense system to protect Guam’s critical assets. While China and North Korea’s ballistic missile capabilities are improving, so too are America’s defenses for a potential battle of seismic implications and consequences for the Indo-Pacific.
Julian McBride is a defense analyst and contributing editor at 19FortyFive.


US-China war will come down to protecting or destroying Guam - Asia Times

If they hit Guam, a US territory, then they're in for the pound and will "hit" US and Allied bases all around the Pacific Rim to include the US West Coast, Hawaii and Alaska. It rapidly goes down hill from there......
 

Plain Jane

Just Plain Jane

China Warns Citizens Against Travel To Japan Amid Serious Taiwan-Related Dust Up​


by Tyler Durden
Friday, Nov 14, 2025 - 07:40 PM
It's no secret that Japan and China have had a long history of animosity, which at times appears to cool but at others flares up to intensity again. The past week has seen historic tensions explode to the forefront once again, resulting in China summoning the Japanese ambassador in Beijing to vehemently denounce some recent statements by Tokyo leadership.

The spat started when Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi made comments in a parliamentary meeting which made clear Japan could possibly intervene militarily in the scenario of China invading Taiwan.

Sanae Takaichi, via Japan Forward

This represents a public first, and potential initial move abandoning the US ally's longstanding 'strategic ambiguity' on the Taiwan issue.

This represents a public first, and potential initial move abandoning the US ally's longstanding 'strategic ambiguity' on the Taiwan issue.

China's foreign ministry had been quick to blast the comments as "egregious" - related in the following:

"The current tensions were sparked at a parliamentary meeting in Japan last Friday, when an opposition lawmaker asked Takaichi what circumstances surrounding Taiwan would count as a survival-threatening situation for Japan.

"If there are battleships and the use of force, no matter how you think about it, it could constitute a survival-threatening situation," Takaichi responded.

A "survival-threatening situation" is a legal term under Japan's 2015 security law, referring to when an armed attack on its allies poses an existential threat to Japan. In such a situation, Japan's self-defense forces can be activated to respond to the threat."


Now, a week after the initial provocative remarks, and China has further escalated the spat by formally advising its citizens to avoid traveling to Japan in the near future over 'safety concerns'.

The foreign ministry specifically invoked PM Takaichi's incendiary Taiwan-related comments, going so far as to say her words created "major risks" to the safety of Chinese nationals in Japan. The ministry further cited "a surge in crimes against Chinese citizens and numerous attacks against them."

The NY Times reviews how this could set off deteriorating relations less than a month in to Takaichi taking office:

"The abuse abruptly ended a honeymoon between Ms. Takaichi, in office for less than a month, and China. She had met China’s top leader, Xi Jinping, just last month in South Korea, with the two leaders warmly shaking hands and smiling.

It also ended China’s turn away from so-called wolf warrior diplomacy, an aggressive, in-your-face approach to foreign relations that took shape after Mr. Xi rose to power in Beijing in 2012 but had largely faded in recent years.

Relations between China and Japan have for decades been prone to intemperate feuds fueled largely by bitter Chinese memories of World War II, when the Japanese army committed multiple atrocities, including the 1937 Nanjing Massacre, crimes for which Beijing believes Tokyo has never sufficiently apologized."

The drastic move further followed a Thursday social media posting by China's foreign ministry - issued in Japanese and English - which warned Tokyo must "stop playing with fire" and that it would be "act of aggression" if Japan "dares to meddles in the cross-Strait situation."

As for Japan, it has been most angered at a social media post issued last Saturday by China's consul general in the Japanese city of Osaka, Xue Jian. He had shared article about Takaichi's parliamentary remarks on X with his own words, "the dirty head that sticks itself in must be cut off." Tokyo quickly lodged its own diplomatic protest over the "high inappropriate" commentary.

But China has still maintained all of this ultimately stems from the "extremely wrong and dangerous" words of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi related to defending Taiwan.

(Tweet at the link.)
 

mecoastie

Has No Life - Lives on TB
So how long until the US and our Pacific Rim allies are in the same "2 key" arrangement the US has with NATO allies such as Germany?........
I suspect we already are with Japan and South Korea. That is if they don’t already have their own Golden Screwdriver capabilities. They both understand the Pacific logistics nightmare and know they must have good domestic capabilities.
 

jward

passin' thru
Air Power
@RealAirPower1
9h

#News: Despite running 20 hour day shifts, it is highly unlikely that the U.S. will be able to deliver the 66 new build F-16Vs to Taiwan by the end of 2026. The only saving grace for Lockheed (and Taiwan) is that it has completed the upgrade of 144 older Taiwanese F-16s to the Block 70/72 standard.
 

jward

passin' thru
realcleardefense.com
Pressure Points: Managing Risk and Escalation in the Taiwan Strait


The Economist called Taiwan ‘the most dangerous place on earth’ in 2021. For the island’s 23 million people, that danger isn’t abstract; it’s a daily reality shaped by the constant shadow of conflict. Across the Taiwan Strait, China’s leaders see the island not as a neighbour but as unfinished business, a critical piece of President Xi Jinping’s vision of national rejuvenation. As Chinese coercion increases and the status quo across the Strait deteriorates, countries in the Indo-Pacific need to do more to maintain balance and deter conflict.

The second instalment of ASPI’s Pressure Points series, released today, covers Taiwan and the Taiwan Strait, Asia’s most volatile flashpoint. Where the first part of Pressure Points examined China’s air and maritime coercion within the first island chain, this instalment focuses on China’s coercion across the Taiwan Strait. It examines how Beijing frames its claim to Taiwan, the coercive tools it increasingly wields to enforce that claim, how Taipei is responding to mounting pressure and how other governments are managing the growing risk of confrontation. It also details potential scenarios that Xi may pursue to forcibly unify Taiwan. The result is a concise and interactive account of one of the Indo-Pacific’s most consequential flashpoints.

The Chinese Communist Party has never governed Taiwan. But since 1949, the party has consistently upheld its ‘One China’ principle. Under Xi, such claims have become more assertive and nationalistic. Xi’s framing of Taiwan as central to the ‘great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation’ has fused what was once a territorial question with the fate of the party itself, an ideological escalation that narrows room for compromise.

Beijing’s coercion of Taiwan isn’t new, but under Xi it has intensified dramatically. Military pressure that once flared episodically has become constant. Chinese aircraft and warships now operate around the island with such regularity that what once constituted a crisis has been normalised. These incursions are carefully calibrated: provocative enough to signal dominance, restrained enough to avoid triggering outright conflict. The cumulative effect is to shrink Taiwan’s operating space, desensitise the region to Chinese military activity and normalise coercion as the baseline of cross-Strait relations.

China’s military has invested heavily in advanced capabilities designed to neutralise Taiwan’s defences and deter outside intervention, particularly from the United States. This rapidly modernising force comprises hypersonic missiles, integrated air defences, autonomous and undersea systems, and amphibious lift capacity. Each Chinese exercise and patrol refines operational readiness and tests the responses of Taiwan and its regional countries.

For Taiwan, this pressure is omnipresent. Yet most citizens continue their lives with stoic normalcy. Beneath that resilience, public sentiment is evolving. While many Taiwanese still favour maintaining the status quo, support for greater recognition of Taiwan’s sovereignty and international identity is growing. Few Taiwanese wish for formal independence if it risks war, but fewer still identify with the mainland or share the CCP’s narrative.

Taiwan’s defence posture reflects this complexity. Since 1949, Taiwanese leaders have repeatedly shifted strategy, alternating between conventional deterrence, high-end modernisation and, more recently, asymmetric defence built on mobility and resilience. President Lai Ching-te has sought to weave these strands into a whole-of-society strategy that strengthens deterrence, manages tensions and enhances national resilience. He faces an unenviable task: to prepare for war without provoking it, and to maintain deterrence without eroding domestic cohesion.

Taiwan today is arguably more outmatched militarily by China than at any time in modern history, yet it is also determined to endure. With finite resources, Taipei is investing in survivability: hardening infrastructure, dispersing forces and fostering whole-of-society readiness that extends beyond the military.

For other countries, supporting Taiwan’s defence and security presents a delicate balancing act: too little support risks leaving Taiwan exposed to coercion and weakens efforts to deter Beijing from engaging in a catastrophic war, yet too much support risks provoking Beijing. Many governments have thus chosen carefully calibrated measures. The logic is clear: while overt confrontation with Beijing would be disastrous, allowing China to advance its objectives unopposed poses an even greater threat to regional stability. The status quo, once seen as a buffer against conflict, is no longer stable. It is dynamic and eroding under the weight of China’s growing military presence and unrelenting exercises.

Taiwan’s security depends on a broader framework that integrates defence, diplomacy and resilience. A whole-of-society approach, with support from likeminded partners, offers the best chance of sustaining stability while managing escalation. That framework need not be purely military. People-to-people exchanges, technology partnerships, shared resilience training and diplomatic coordination can reinforce Taiwan’s ability to withstand pressure without crossing Beijing’s red lines. Such an approach recognises that Taiwan’s strength lies not only in its asymmetric capabilities but in its democratic vibrancy, its technological prowess, and its web of partnerships.

The contest over Taiwan is not merely territorial; it is a struggle between coercion and resilience, between an authoritarian vision of unity and a democratic determination to endure. For the CCP, Taiwan represents the unfinished chapter of China’s rise. For the people of Taiwan, it is home, a vibrant, self-governing society determined to chart its own course. The Indo-Pacific’s future hinges on which vision prevails.
 

jward

passin' thru
Taiwan Security Monitor
@TaiwanMonitor
2h

NEW: Today, Japanese Minister of Defense Shinjiro Koizumi visited Yonaguni, the westernmost Japanese island in the Senkakus. After inspecting a JGSDF garrison, Koizumi announced that the JSDF will deploy a Type 03 Chū-SAM missile battery on the island, to “reduce the likelihood of an armed attack against our country.” The Type 03 has an effective range of approximately 50 km, while Yonaguni itself is approximately 105 km from Taiwan.

Below is our visualization of the Type 03's future deployment on Yonaguni.
View: https://twitter.com/TaiwanMonitor/status/1992670218779344948?s=20
 

jward

passin' thru
thediplomat.com
Taiwan Wants to Join AUKUS. That’s Impossible – and Irrelevant.


In a November 24 interview with the Australian Financial Review, Taiwan’s de facto ambassador to Australia, Representative Douglas Yu-tien Hsu, expressed Taiwan’s desire to join AUKUS’s advanced technology cooperation track, “Pillar II.” Hsu argued that due to strengths in manufacturing, semiconductors, and emerging technologies, Taiwan can work “with other countries, especially in AUKUS Pillar II, to advance those defense and technologies to the next level.”

Although joining Pillar II would be a strong geopolitical signal about allied defense industrial bases across the Indo-Pacific and the Euro-Atlantic, it’s unlikely to happen. Still, Taiwan does not need to become a full-fledged member to benefit from and contribute to AUKUS.

Announced on September 15, 2021, AUKUS is a trilateral security partnership between Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States that was launched to “help sustain peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region” as a part of the Integrated Deterrence concept. It has two “pillars”: Pillar I focuses on supplying, developing, and delivering nuclear-powered conventional attack submarines (SSNs) to Australia by the 2040s. In contrast, Pillar II’s purpose is to develop advanced defense and dual-use technology capabilities in underseas capabilities, quantum science, artificial intelligence and autonomy, hypersonics/counter-hypersonics, and electronic warfare.

Although Pillar I has faced recent pressures related to Washington’s “America First” priorities and possible SSN delivery delays, many in Canberra, London, and Washington argue that Pillar II is the real force multiplier and should be expanded beyond AUKUS’s original membership. As like-minded partners such as Taiwan expand their dual-use ecosystems, they reinforce deterrence across both the Indo-Pacific and Euro-Atlantic theaters, even if AUKUS itself is Indo-Pacific in focus.

A report from the Parliament of Australia noted that the DNA of AUKUS’s Pillar II can be found in the Five Eyes countries’ Technical Cooperation Program (TTCP), which seeks to bolster “research and development (R&D) capabilities at minimal cost, to avoid duplication and to improve interoperability.” However, Pillar II moves beyond the TTCP’s original remit by focusing exclusively on emerging technologies.

Many like-minded allies and partners have expressed interest in participating in Pillar II, including Canada, Japan, New Zealand, and South Korea. What Pillar II offers these governments, as well as Taiwan, is the recognition and substance that come from participating in arguably the world’s most advanced emerging technology deterrence network.

For Taiwan, AUKUS Membership Is Not the Point

Yet formal membership for Taiwan in AUKUS is impossible for several reasons, ranging from sensitivities in Canberra and London to the need for stronger classified information laws and concerns about Chinese espionage across the island. These obstacles, stemming from blowback from China, legal hurdles, and concerns about protecting classified information, are real and should be taken seriously by all parties.

That said, AUKUS, specifically Pillar II, is not a military alliance nor does it have an alliance structure. AUKUS’s “wide scope” and “open-ended … multilateral arrangement involving military industrial integration” is flexible enough to involve non-members.

This is already being seen in private-sector efforts such as Industry Trailblazer, AUKUS Connect, and Pillar Two Labs. The broader ecosystem of these initiatives – as well as related networks and challenges – are modular enough for collaboration with any like-minded partner, including Taiwan. These plug-and-play AUKUS-adjacent initiatives are very similar to NATO DIANA’s 17 accelerator sites and more than 180 test centers. Pillar II already functions as a flexible, modular network like NATO DIANA, making Taiwan’s ad hoc participation straightforward.

This decentralized nature of Pillar II makes Taiwan a natural partner, as Taiwan is already working with NATO frontline states on dual-use technologies that go beyond Pillar II’s remit. Bringing Taiwan into Pillar II’s projects on an ad hoc basis, even without the AUKUS brand or just with individual member countries bilaterally, would still be a benefit.

For Taiwan, full membership in AUKUS Pillar II is thus irrelevant. The ability to participate in opt-in projects and industry networks, compete for joint challenges, and use AUKUS Pillar II to further integrate into NATO-standardized technologies is a larger prize.

AUKUS members stand to benefit from Taiwan’s participation, too. Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te’s recent efforts to develop a large Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) export industry – one that helps partners avoid reliance on China – and the indigenous capabilities required for a new extensive domestic air defense system, as well as undersea and surface platforms, complement AUKUS Pillar II’s six priority areas.

Taiwan’s Existing Like-minded Tech Partnerships

Taiwan is already positioning itself as an indispensable partner for like-minded NATO members, such as Czechia, Lithuania, and Poland. Cooperation levels between these NATO frontline states and Taiwan vary, but they include semiconductors, UAVs, lasers, cybersecurity, and more. These collaborations have sparked interest from other like-minded partners, such as Israel and Ukraine, and their battlefield-tested technologies.

Taken together, these collaborations demonstrate two things: first, Taiwan is capable of being trusted with sensitive technologies by NATO frontline states that face daily threats from Russian pressure. And, second, that the depth of these collaborations and their capabilities align nicely with the formal priorities of AUKUS Pillar II and, in some cases, exceed them.

Similarly, AUKUS members are already collaborating with Taiwan in areas with substantial dual-use technological implications that intersect directly with Pillar II’s focus areas. The United Kingdom and Taiwan collaborate on semiconductors, space technologies, and cybersecurity. Australia and Taiwan work together on cybersecurity and advanced technologies through universities. Lastly, the United States collaborates extensively with Taiwan on UAVs, semiconductors, space, and more. Furthermore, all three AUKUS members now participate in Taiwan’s Global Cooperation and Training Framework (GCTF), with the U.K. joining recently.

NATO frontline states facing similar levels of pressure from a large, potential future adversary to what Taiwan experiences daily already collaborate with Taipei on advanced technologies. Why should AUKUS members, which are also active in the GCTF, not do the same?

How AUKUS Can Collaborate With Taiwan

To collaborate with Taiwan, AUKUS members do not need new treaties, funding streams, or expansive mechanisms; they can simply make use of existing collaboration mechanisms and include AUKUS branding.

For example, the private-sector association AUKUS Forum outlined mechanisms for collaborating with New Zealand, Japan, South Korea, and Canada on Pillar II, included Industry Trailblazer, AUKUS Connect, and Pillar Two Labs. Through these initiatives, as AUKUS Forum put it, “collaboration on advanced technology, sovereign capability, and shared security interests can progress even when formal alliances or treaty structures are not in place.”

In place of “nation to nation” collaboration between Taiwan and AUKUS members, “industry to industry” and “capability to capability” links will suffice. Czechia, Lithuania, and Poland use industry and capability frameworks to collaborate with Taiwan as well through industry associations, companies, and universities.

To work with AUKUS members and broader allied defense innovation ecosystems in more sensitive and classified settings, such as NATO’s Innovation Fund and DIANA, and the Pentagon’s Partnership for Indo-Pacific Industrial Resilience (which Taiwan has already engaged with), Taiwan’s legislature could explore having the Ministry of National Defense draft a report highlighting obstacles to alignment. Similarly, the U.S. Congress could assess having the Pentagon do the same so that Taiwan can be integrated into sensitive AUKUS Pillar II programs on an ad hoc basis. This would offer political deniability to Canberra and London, where Beijing’s reactions shape diplomatic calculations.

Recognition Over Accession

Taiwan does not need formal AUKUS membership to shape Pillar II. The biggest benefit to Taiwan is the recognition that it is becoming increasingly central to the global defense of emerging technologies and advanced capabilities. Participation and cooperation on an ad hoc basis would benefit AUKUS members and deepen Taiwan’s position in allied supply chains across NATO, the Indo-Pacific, and beyond.

Australia, the U.K., and the U.S. can quietly incorporate Taiwan through existing mechanisms within their broader networks of like-minded allies. As collaboration with NATO frontline states shows, Taiwan is capable of meeting that moment. Pillar II’s future effectiveness depends on how well it integrates capable actors, not how tightly it polices the edges of membership.
 

Zahra

Veteran Member
"China views Taiwan as its territory and has accused the U.S. of supporting formal Taiwan independence. The U.S., however, has never recognized mainland sovereignty over the island democracy and views its legal status as unresolved."

But Taiwan was never part of China historically! The Island was originally known as Formosa and was once part of the Japanese empire. It was never ever Chinese! China having ambitions to conquer Taiwan is no different than Germany conquering France. If China takes Taiwan, you'd best plan on them going for Okinawa and the rest of Japan as well, so I hope the Japanese are gearing up and I hope our war planners are too.
 

danielboon

TB Fanatic
EndGameWW3

@EndGameWW3
·
1h


TAIPEI/BEIJING, Dec 3 (Reuters) - Taiwan expressed thanks and China was upset on Wednesday after President Donald Trump signed into law legislation requiring the U.S. State Department to regularly review and update guidelines on how the United States officially interacts with Taipei.
 

Plain Jane

Just Plain Jane

Japan's Sanae Takaichi Seeks To Ease Deepening Row With China, Reaffirms Taiwan Status Quo​

by Tyler Durden
Wednesday, Dec 03, 2025 - 11:00 PM
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi finally appears to be backing down amid recent escalating punitive measures imposed on Tokyo by China in the areas of trade, diplomacy, and tourism. Beijing has been dialing up the pressure for weeks, after the new prime minister nearly a month ago told Japanese parliament an attack on Taiwan by the People's Liberation Army could pose a "survival-threatening situation" for which Tokyo would be justified in intervening militarily.

Feeling immense pressure and blowback from the provocative prior comments, Takaichi on Wednesday while again addressing parliament reverted back to providing clarity that Japan's official position on the self-ruled island remains unchanged. "The Japanese government's basic position regarding Taiwan remains as stated in the 1972 Japan-China Joint Communique, and there has been no change to this position," Takaichi said.
Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, pool image/NY Times

The historic 1972 communique spells out that "the government of the People’s Republic of China reiterates that Taiwan is an inalienable part of the territory of the People’s Republic of China" before affirming that the Japanese government "fully understands and respects this stand."

The communique further states that Japan "firmly maintains its stand under Article 8 of the Potsdam Declaration." China also often cites the Cairo Declaration of November 1943 as having the legal status of a binding treaty. The Cairo Declaration requires that Japan return any territory seized from China during war. The two documents formed the basis of the 20th century post-war WW2 era normalization of ties between the two historic enemies and rivals.

Since last month, China's Foreign Ministry has been insisting on a full retraction and apology from PM Takaichi over her 'defend Taiwan' remarks - which drew a sharp rebuke from ministry spokesperson Mao Ning. "Stop crossing the line and playing with fire, retract the wrongful remarks and deeds and honor its commitments to China with real action," Ning said at the time.

On Monday ministry spokesperson Lin Jian repeated the demand, urging Japan to "learn the lessons of history, do soul searching, take seriously what it has heard from the Chinese side, simply retract the erroneous remarks as it should and take practical steps to honor its political commitments to China." Takaichi's fresh remarks recognizing the status quo on Taiwan, which was spurred by questions from lawmakers, could soften the crisis - yet Beijing is likely to still keep up the pressure given her words stopped short of a formal retraction and apology.

"President Xi is trying to stir up trouble wherever he can and intimidate countries like Japan," Senator John Cornyn (R-TX) told ZeroHedge on Wednesday, calling Japan an important US ally. He described that he views the US stance of Strategic Ambiguity on Taiwan as "not necessarily a bad thing" because "we want President Xi to think not just once or not just twice but many times before he pulls the trigger which unfortunately I think is preparing to do."

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) also responded on the question of allowing China to believe that it owns Taiwan. "We shouldn't do that," he told us. "Taiwan has a right to be independent, they are a free and independent nation, they should remain that way. Whether we given them security guarantees if a different question."

"We should tell them 'you don't have any right to conquer them'. It plays into China's hands to treat the Taiwanese as if they're owned by China," Hawley emphasized, declaring further that "we ought to be clear about it."
China of course remains Japan's biggest trading partner, and has already taken harsh retaliatory measures including the curbing of Japanese seafood imports, the cancellation of films and concerts - as well as cultural exchange programs, as well as the drastic move of urging Chinese citizens to avoid all travel to Japan.

In addition to Japan's vital seafood industry being impacted, the restaurant scene is also feeling the fallout:

Diners once had to book weeks in advance to secure a table at Toya, a popular Japanese restaurant in Beijing.
But business has taken a sharp turn, with more than 60 reservations cancelled since mid-November, said owner Kazuyuki Tanioka, who has served omakase menus in the Chinese capital for over a decade.
And the film industry, per the same report:

The spat has also led to the postponement of Japanese film releases in China, the abrupt cancellation of concerts by Japanese musicians and the suspension of official exchanges.
A frequent traveller to Japan, Yan Jun, faced a dilemma when China advised its citizens to avoid visiting Japan. Chinese airlines proceeded to cut hundreds of Japan-bound flights this month.
China's PLA Navy and Coast Guard have also increased their presence near Taiwan and in and near disputed islands and waters. The latest incident involving Japanese and Chinese vessels happened near a group of geopolitically sensitive islands in the East China Sea on Tuesday, as we documented previously.
 

mecoastie

Has No Life - Lives on TB
"China views Taiwan as its territory and has accused the U.S. of supporting formal Taiwan independence. The U.S., however, has never recognized mainland sovereignty over the island democracy and views its legal status as unresolved."

But Taiwan was never part of China historically! The Island was originally known as Formosa and was once part of the Japanese empire. It was never ever Chinese! China having ambitions to conquer Taiwan is no different than Germany conquering France. If China takes Taiwan, you'd best plan on them going for Okinawa and the rest of Japan as well, so I hope the Japanese are gearing up and I hope our war planners are too.
The Japanese captured it from China in the 1890s. Prior to that it was part of China.
 

jward

passin' thru
Mario Nawfal
@MarioNawfal
1h

BEIJING: “TAIWAN IS THE RED LINE.” WASHINGTON: “THEN WE’RE STANDING ON IT.”

Beijing didn’t wait 48 hours after Trump’s new National Security Strategy hit the wires - it snapped back with the full chest-thumping script:

Taiwan is the “first red line.” Cross it and we stop being polite.

China spent the past week flooding East Asian waters with its largest naval and coast guard surge ever - a flex that says “read our statement, but watch our ships.”

Washington’s doctrine? Classic Trump-era posture:

Build muscle, name the threat, dare them to blink.
The NSS frames Taiwan not as an afterthought, but as the test of American resolve in the Indo-Pacific.

Beijing heard that loud and clear.

Taipei - caught in the middle but not playing victim — loved it.

President Lai practically quote-tweeted it with a salute emoji minus the emoji: Deterrence is good. More, please.

Taiwan’s defense minister spelled out the subtext: The U.S. wants a regional NATO-lite, and Taiwan better hit the gym.

Lai is already opening the wallet: +$40B in new spending and a target of 5% of GDP on defense by 2030.

That’s Ukraine-level urgency without the war.

Here’s the real story, in short: Beijing is warning. Washington is signaling. Taiwan is preparing.

Everyone says they want “stability,” but all 3 are building for impact.

Nobody wants war; while everyone's acting like it’s plausible.

Source: Reuters
Media: Asia Times
 

jward

passin' thru
Visioner
@visionergeo
2h

‼️ BIG | The U.S. National Security Strategy Establishes the Principle of “Defending Taiwan” — says Su Ziyun, Head of Taiwan’s Institute for National Defense and Security.

Based on his analysis of the document, Su notes that the United States is shifting from strategic ambiguity to strategic clarity regarding Taiwan’s defense. The priority of the Taiwan issue in Washington’s policy is increasing, while the main emphasis is moving toward collective defense mechanisms and preventing any attempt to change the status quo by force.

For the first time, the U.S. strategy includes a direct formulation declaring the seizure of Taiwan by any specific state unacceptable — and the document no longer contains the traditional references to the “One China Policy” that appeared under previous administrations.

Although China is not openly criticized in the strategy, the text implicitly reflects a containment approach: Beijing is described as the only actor possessing both the intent and the capabilities to alter the global order. For comparison: Trump’s first National Defense Strategy mentioned Taiwan three times, Biden’s document five times, while the new strategy refers to Taiwan eight times.

Su Ziyun also emphasizes that the entire “Trump 2.0” team is strongly anti-communist. According to him, despite Trump’s sharp rhetoric, his decision-making circle fully recognizes Taiwan’s geopolitical value. The incorporation of the “Taiwan Assurance Act” into domestic U.S. law has practically eliminated the so-called “anti-Americanism theory.”

Su further highlights public sentiment in Taiwan: according to surveys, up to 40% of Taiwanese citizens are willing to sacrifice their lives for their country, and around 70% are ready to go to war. These are among the highest levels seen in democratic states and, in Su’s view, demonstrate the reliability and mobilization capacity of Taiwanese society. The remaining challenge concerns the governing party’s communication skills.

As Su Ziyun states: “Taiwan is not hostile to China — the Chinese Communist Party is hostile to democracy.” He urges the opposition to take the “correct historical position,” support the defense budget, and show the world that Taiwan’s democracy is maturing and ready to assume responsibility for its own security. Only in this way, he argues, can Taiwan establish a positive cycle of cooperation with its allies.

Ultimately, the publication of the U.S. National Security Strategy shows that Taiwan has now been fully integrated into the American strategic architecture of the Indo-Pacific region. The frequent mentions of Taiwan, references to “collective defense,” and the omission of the “One China” phrase all illustrate the deepening of Washington’s involvement.

Taiwan’s leadership interprets the new strategy as confirmation of U.S. guarantees, which further strengthens its political reliance on Washington. The internal Taiwanese discourse is increasingly shaped by American assessments — from defining threats to military standards and defense-budget requirements.

Taiwan is effectively adopting the American strategic logic of regional confrontation with China: it is strengthening its armed forces according to U.S. expectations, deepening cooperation with the Pentagon, and aligning political rhetoric with American interests, which in turn heightens tensions with Beijing.

See the latest updates with us: @visionergeo
 

jward

passin' thru
WORLD AT WAR
@World_At_War_6

"JAPAN WILL DEFEND TAIWAN"

Japanese officials have recently indicated a strong possibility of military intervention in a China-Taiwan conflict.

Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi stated that a Chinese attack on Taiwan could be considered an "existential crisis" for Japan's security, which, under Japanese law, could permit the use of force in collective self-defense with its allies, primarily the United States.

Taiwan is strategically important to Japan, as approximately 80% of Japan's energy imports pass through the seas around Taiwan.

A Chinese takeover or blockade would severely disrupt these critical sea lines of communication, posing a fundamental threat to Japan's economy and national survival.

War is coming......
 

northern watch

TB Fanatic
WORLD AT WAR
@World_At_War_6

"JAPAN WILL DEFEND TAIWAN"

Japanese officials have recently indicated a strong possibility of military intervention in a China-Taiwan conflict.

Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi stated that a Chinese attack on Taiwan could be considered an "existential crisis" for Japan's security, which, under Japanese law, could permit the use of force in collective self-defense with its allies, primarily the United States.

Taiwan is strategically important to Japan, as approximately 80% of Japan's energy imports pass through the seas around Taiwan.

A Chinese takeover or blockade would severely disrupt these critical sea lines of communication, posing a fundamental threat to Japan's economy and national survival.

War is coming......
The Chinese remember the Rape of Nanking 1937, when the time comes nukes will fly.
 

auxman

Deus vult...
Lyle Morris:

PLA Eastern Theater Command has just announced a major excercise starting this evening U.S. time and lasting until Tuesday. It is called "Justice Mission 2025" (正义使命-2025) and appears to again simulate a blockade-type scenario of Taiwan.

According to the ETC spox, the drills will focus on "sea-air combat readiness patrols, joint seizure of comprehensive superiority, blockades of key ports and areas, as well as all-dimensional deterrence outside the island chain."

He added:
"With vessels and aircraft approaching Taiwan Island in close proximity from different directions, troops from multiple services are engaging in joint assaults to test their joint operations capabilities, he said in a statement. This is a stern warning against "Taiwan Independence" separatist forces, and it is a legitimate and necessary action to safeguard China’s sovereignty and national unity."

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/2005437609892360401
 
Top