EBOLA Brutal Triage

Rescuedog

Inactive
http://pfmhcolumbia.wordpress.com/2014/10/12/les-roberts-the-prediction-landscape-is-looking-bad/


Day 7: Brutal Triage

The prediction landscape is looking bad. The official numbers reported are laboratory confirmed cases. Typically, we think people need 7-10ish days to become symptomatic. Typically people have symptoms for 7 days before they get into a health facility. A month ago, it was one day, now it typically takes 4 days from when a patient is sampled to when the patient is told the result of their test (and lots get lost and mislabeled….). Thus, the numbers that you hear about new cases today reflect the transmission dynamics from over 2 weeks ago…..and we thought the doubling time of the outbreak was 30 days, it seems to be less than that here. We knew the ~350 confirmed cases last week were an undercount….we now think there are 7-900 in reality. The need for hospital beds is climbing more than the ability to get them up and running. There might be 200ish ebola treatment beds now countrywide. There are perhaps 600 more in “holding areas.” We have schemes to get 500 or 600 ebola treatment beds up and running over the next 8 weeks. As Foreign Medical Team Coordinator, helping to get these beds up and supported is one of my primary tasks. If there are really 3000 cases this month, and 6000 next month…with all going perfectly on the treatment bed establishment side, we will have 30% of the beds we need next month, slightly worse than the situation now.

The Ministry of Health and WHO are trying to fill the void with Ebola Community Care Units (ECU’s). Tents with eight beds….maybe two tents, a wet tent (vomit and diarrhea) and a dry tent and a big buffer zone around with a couple latrines and a burning pit and a water supply. They will be staffed by low level health workers or community volunteers, ideally survivors of ebola who will have immunity. The idea is that at the first sign of symptoms, the family brings the feverish loved one in. Everyone will be treated with an antimalarial and an antibiotic. If they can be tested for ebola, they will be. If not, they get monitored and if they develop 3 of the key symptoms they get referred to a proper hospital bed….which will be in short supply….or otherwise they move to the wet tent. They will be given ORS….maybe food….maybe they die, maybe they do not. This is very close to no treatment. But the goal is to get them out of their houses to where they will be less likely to infect others. The supervision will be scant. The work for those in the ECU’s will be very risky. Even MSF has had several staff infected now and they are hyper-vigilant and resource rich. But the logic is, for every health worker infected or ECU malaria patient who becomes infected with ebola while waiting in such a unit, 2 or three infections that would have happened if the person died at home will not occur.

We aspire that we will have ~150 of these going in 60 days….which involves a million dollars per unit, major logistic planning and supply chains, site preparation by the community, and well drilling…..this will be a massive effort. But 2000 beds in ECU’s, 700 treatment beds…might be half of what we need by December. Thus, barring a dynamic change in the outbreak growth, in November, in December, most cases will likely die at home.

Thus, the CDC has been pushing kits and training messages to promote “safe home care.” The kits would have ORS (a lot…like 20 sachets) and gloves and masks and chlorine and an ORS mixing bottle. The kits’ design is yet to be finalized by the MOH and the international community. The main part of the kit will be messages to the family. Keep the person in a room alone, and no one shares their bathroom. Only have one person deal with them…don’t touch them…wear gloves…wash with chlorine as you exit their room. Again, like the ECU’s this is not about treating the ill as much as it is about minimizing infections. The logic flows like this:

Interim Ebola Approach

If you think about it a few steps removed from West Africa, this is freakin’ wild. We are primarily trying to facilitate people to die without infecting others. Very little of this logic beyond the ORS is about treatment. The last year PEPFAR was in full bloom, with all the administrative layers and consultants, it spent $10,000 per patient to have Africans on anti-retrovirals. The rights-based advocates were screaming about how it was only fair that Africans get what Westerners got. In July there was an Onion headline “Experts: Ebola Vaccine At Least 50 White People Away.” http://www.theonion.com/articles/experts-ebola-vaccine-at-least-50-white-people-awa,36580/ It seemed kind of funny then…now that we are being so brutal in our public health triage it is much much less funny….maybe prophetic. We are about to assist thousands and thousands of people to die an excruciating death at home without even the most mild of pain relief. We are going to set up treatment facilities in hundreds of villages for one of the most deadly of diseases to be largely run by volunteers who will be lucky to get 3 days of training. Dozens, perhaps hundreds of them will die. And the most surreal aspect of this triage for me is that I completely think that this is the right thing to do given where we are and the limited ability to respond. As I think about you students reading this I struggle with the degree to which my endorsement of this multipronged approach is pragmatism or wisdom or loss of idealism.

Les
Share this:
 

raven

TB Fanatic
Did you catch this?

"We are primarily trying to facilitate people to die without infecting others."

At some point someone will realize - we are going to HAVE to facilitate people to die without infecting others - QUICKER

You know what that means - you know I am not the only one to think it
 
Did you catch this?

"We are primarily trying to facilitate people to die without infecting others."

At some point someone will realize - we are going to HAVE to facilitate people to die without infecting others - QUICKER

You know what that means - you know I am not the only one to think it




Kinda makes "Soylent Green" seem like a pleasant Sunday picnic.
 

vessie

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Did you catch this?

"We are primarily trying to facilitate people to die without infecting others."

At some point someone will realize - we are going to HAVE to facilitate people to die without infecting others - QUICKER

You know what that means - you know I am not the only one to think it

Yes, and I don't think it involves the old fashioned, "Toss'em over the back fence" as my dad was of want to say to us when it was his time. V
 

timbo

Deceased
You know all those large expanses of pretty green lawns around hospitals?

Think large bulldozer dug holes and pallets of lime bags next to them.

Dig deep and add the lime. Next, cover the latest load with a covering of dirt and add more bodies.

IF we can get someone to do that job.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Did you catch this?

"We are primarily trying to facilitate people to die without infecting others."

At some point someone will realize - we are going to HAVE to facilitate people to die without infecting others - QUICKER

You know what that means - you know I am not the only one to think it

So we talking a "hot shot" of morphine or a dropper worth of Sarin? A bullet would be too messy and obvious.
 

Laurelayn

Veteran Member
I just keep thinking that since ebola presents with the same symptoms as flu and flu season is just about to get started.....what the hell is going to happen then? they cant test thousands let alone isolate. I do believe it is going to be a very nasty winter.
 

Doomer Doug

TB Fanatic
The modern version of the Middle Ages cart piled high with bodies is going to be a bulldozer to load the bodies in a dump truck. Backhoes will dig large trenches and then either vehicle mounted, or people with flamethrowers will burn the corpses to ash.

We have no idea what a global pandemic with millions of dead will be like.

We will eventually see people in the US avoiding the entire medical system just like is happening in Africa. The medical system, hospitals and medical workers will be seen as places where people go to die.
 

Rescuedog

Inactive
I don't think there is anything funny about the OP. The misery and suffering that is taking place to our human brothers and sisters is terrible.

RD
 

MinnesotaSmith

Membership Revoked
Did you catch this?

"We are primarily trying to facilitate people to die without infecting others."

At some point someone will realize - we are going to HAVE to facilitate people to die without infecting others - QUICKER

You know what that means - you know I am not the only one to think it

Agreed. Going all the way by kinetic public health actions to fight the Ebola epidemic would go beyond just ending all plane flights from or to (that land on the ground) countries where Ebola is epidemic, years-long ban on imported goods of any kind from that region, etc. The "gravest extreme" would be more like hundred-plane air raids with napalm payloads (and the pilots carrying cyanide pills in case they crash). Well, that's the most extreme measure I can think of short of nuclear weapons, anyway...
 

Millwright

Knuckle Dragger
_______________
If it turns into a real mass casualty situation, combat engineer units will probably have be used for burials to start out.

Next I can see National Guard units being quickly trained up on the NBC skills needed to operate in this environment.

It will be hard to find civilian equipment operators will to work at this, especially with highly contagious bodies.
 

poppy

Veteran Member
I'm still not convinced Ebola is all that deadly if treated early. Duncan was treated late because of the hospital screw up and he is the only one to die in the US so far. I imagine many in Africa are well along in symptoms before they seek medical attention and the system is so overwhelmed that proper treatment is often unavailable to them. They say the death rate in now 70%. I wonder if it wouldn't be MUCH lower if people obtained proper treatment earlier.
 

Squib

Veteran Member
How do we know they're not Euthanizing patients already? I'd bet they are in Liberia...maybe not officially as policy, but...
 

night driver

ESFP adrift in INTJ sea
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-10-15/ebola-how-worried-should-we-be

SUPERB article on Ebola nuts and bolts as to how it works.

Pics and embeds at link.
Home
Ebola! How Worried Should We Be?
Tyler Durden's pictureSubmitted by Tyler Durden on 10/15/2014 21:52 -0400

Chris Martenson Global Economy




inShare
7

Submitted by Chris Martenson via Peak Prosperity,

The current Ebola outbreak, unlike others throughout history, is lasting a very long time; with cases now being reported on a variety of continents well outside of its equatorial African origin.

I'm not especially worried about Ebola striking me or my loved ones, for reasons I'll explain in a moment. But I'm growing increasingly concerned about government response to the outbreak.

So let's spend some time understanding the nature of Ebola, specifically, and viral contagion, more generally. At the very least, Ebola can serve as an instructive reminder about how our society's responses to a viral outbreak could prove to be at least as disruptive and damaging as the virus itself.

Ebola

While very often cited as being 90% fatal once contracted, Ebola is rarely that lethal. In fact it was only that lethal in a single isolated outbreak. A 50% to 70% mortality rate is more common. As of Oct 10 2014, the latest outbreak had afflicted 8,376 and killed 4,024 -- a mortality rate of 48%.

This places the Ebola strain responsible for the latest outbreak on the lower end of the Ebola lethality scale. Don't misunderstand me: this is still a very deadly virus, to be sure. But it's not a guaranteed death sentence, either.

Viruses come in a wide variety of types and shapes. But the general structure they all share is that they have some form of nuclear material, either DNA itself or RNA, housed inside of a protein capsule. Think of a peanut M&M, where the peanut is the genetic payload and the outer coatings serve both a protective purpose (while the virus is seeking a new host) and as the means of docking with a host's cell.

That’s really all a virus is. A few proteins and some genetic material. No membranes, no sexual merging of genetic material, and no ability to replicate themselves all on their own. There are debates still ongoing today as to whether a virus should even be considered a living thing.

The life cycle of a virus is very simple. A virus particle will dock with a target host cell (most viruses are highly specific for the precise sorts of cells they will and won’t bind to), insert its genetic payload which hijacks the host’s replicative machinery, replicate the genetic payload wildly which codes for both new genetic material and protein capsule subunits, and then reassemble lots of intact virus particles which then escape the host cell to go and find other cells to infect.

Within a mammalian host, once a virus attack is recognized, an antibody response is mounted and the fight is on. As the virus particles escape the host cell (which is usually damaged or killed as a consequence of having been hijacked) it is vulnerable to being identified by a host antibody, itself a highly-specialized protein that will 'dock' with a virus particle more or less permanently (they bind together very tightly) and thereby incapacitate the virus’ ability to dock to a new host cell.

With lethal viruses, something goes wrong with this process. Either the virus replicates too quickly for the host to counter effectively, or the virus tricks the immune response into either too little or too much activity -- both conditions which can end poorly for the host.

For example, the Spanish flu epidemic of 1918 preferentially killed those between the ages of 20 and 40. This was unusual because it's exactly opposite the flu mortality patterns we normally expect, where the very young and the very old are the most susceptible.

The best prevailing explanation for this is that it was the very health and vigor of the patients that did them in. The Spanish flu (and other avian flu strains) cause the host body to unleash a 'cytokine storm' which is a very unhealthy, and sometimes lethal, positive feedback loop between immune cells and a class of attractor signaling molecules called cytokines. As more cytokines are released, say into the lung tissue, immune cells are attracted and can then release more cytokines, which attracts more immune cells, and so on. The place to which they are attracted becomes damaged by this overly-aggressive response of the immune cells and for the Spanish flu victims, this happened in the lungs, critically impairing respiration. Hence, the 'healthier' a host was, the more damage the Spanish flu virus caused.

In the case of Ebola, the virus preferentially targets the cells that line the inner walls of blood vessels (a.k.a. endothelial cells) as well as white blood cells, a fact which helps to spread the virus throughout the body fairly rapidly, as white blood cells actively migrate system-wide.

Through a variety of mechanisms, the Ebola virus causes the endothelial cells to detach from the blood vessels and die, which compromises blood vessel integrity. This targeting of the blood vessels is why the Ebola virus is classified as a hemorrhagic fever. The patient's blood vessels literally break down. That leads to the many visible symptoms of an Ebola victim, not the least of which is various burst blood vessels all throughout the body.



(Source)

Currently, it's thought that once exposed, an Ebola victim will incubate the virus for a period of up to 21 days before symptoms express. It's only once the victim is symptomatic that they themselves can transmit the virus and infect others.

This characteristic of Ebola, more than any other, is why I don’t fear it overly much as a pandemic risk. A far more worrisome virus would be one that's infective during asymptomatic stages of its host cycle, as is the case with HIV.

Early symptoms of Ebola include the sudden onset of fever, intense weakness, muscle pain, headache and sore throat. Unfortunately, that pretty much describes any reasonably intense flu, which complicates screening procedures and causes unnecessary worry among those who merely have the flu but worry about the possibility of Ebola.

Nonetheless, authorities have no choice but to take every traveling passenger with these very ordinary flu symptoms as a possible Ebola case. It's a safe bet we’ll hear plenty in the coming days and weeks about Hazmat-suited response teams escorting sickly passengers off of planes.

A tip: if you have a fever, don’t travel. You'll worry a lot of people unnecessarily. And you may end up in quarantine, really throwing your travel plans off the rails.

The Short-Term Risk

While gruesome and heartbreaking, the actual number of deaths by Ebola as well as the total number of people infected is very, very low compared to other hazards out there.

Are you more worried about Ebola than driving to work? If so, you have those risks entirely inverted.



(Source)

In the above chart, there are 27 years worth of data contained in each data point. That means that if the chart reads 2,700 for a given day, then an average of 100 people died on US roads on that day each year out of 27.

For the US, the above chart translates into ~33,000 vehicle deaths per year. Even in Africa where some 4,000 people have died from Ebola so far in 2014, America's vehicle fatalities dwarf that current statistic.

Other communicable diseases such as HIV, tuberculosis, malaria, and diarrheal disease cause some 9 million deaths worldwide each year.

This is why I'm personally not that worried about Ebola striking me or my family here in the eastern US at this time. Nor would I be overly worried in Dallas, where the first two US-soil cases of Ebola command national attention. The odds of getting infected at this point are very low at the individual level.

The Longer-Term Risk

However, I do think that the reaction to Ebola, which could include ex- and inter-US travel bans and other economically and socially disruptive practices could be another matter altogether at this moment in time. While there is a small, but non-zero, chance that this Ebola strain could morph into something more virulent, there is a very good chance of a more Draconian government response developing.

In Part 2: Prudent Precautions To Take Now, we dive into not only what damage to our civil liberties and livelihood these heavy-handed and poorly executed government responses are likely to be, but we also address the actions that individuals can take today on important questions like:

Who is at risk of infection in the current ebola outbreak?
What's the likelihood the current strain will morph into a more virulent form?
What are the best steps to take today to reduce your vulnerability to a pandemic?
What Ebola reminds us of is that when a true pandemic arrives it will travel much faster than those in the past (thanks to air travel being an order of magnitude faster than dawning recognition) and that our complex, highly leveraged, just-in-time global economy is utterly unprepared for even a minor glitch in the flow of goods let alone the virtual lockdown that a true pandemic would require.

A small amount of preparing can make you much less vulnerable should (when?) that comes to pass.

Click here to access Part 2 of this report (free executive summary; enrollment required for full access)
 
Top