INTL Britain: Gay couple going on trial for rape and murder of 13-month-old adopted child…

Cardinal

Chickministrator
_______________
This will undoubtedly be the most chilling and disturbing story readers hear today, but as horrific as it is, it needs to be told, because this cannot happen to another child.


A gay couple stands accused of the rape and murder of their 13-month-old adopted son. They were charged months ago, and now the trial is set to begin on April 14, 2026, at Preston Crown Court.

The details of this story are impossible for a normal human brain to comprehend. And once again, this case, coming on the heels of many others like it, has people asking whether gay couples should be allowed to adopt children.

Italy has made it more difficult for gay couples to adopt children.

CBC:

Italy’s parliament made it illegal on Wednesday for couples to go abroad to have a baby via surrogacy — a pet project of Prime Minister’s Giorgia Meloni party that activists say is meant to target same-sex partners.

Since taking office in 2022, Meloni has pursued a highly conservative social agenda, looking to promote what she sees as “traditional family values,” making it progressively harder for LGBTQ+ couples to become legal parents.

Now, with this disturbing story resurfacing because of the upcoming trial, many are wondering what guardrails will be put in place to protect children. It is not only the number of cases involving child abuse and sexual assault that has people concerned, but also whether this is the right environment in which to raise children. Many same-sex couples may be struggling, and some believe that parenting and raising children becomes even more complicated when homosexuality is part of the household.

Catholic.com:

There are many reasons that we could give, such as how studies show that same-sex relationships have negative effects on children, but suffice it to say the fundamental reason is that it presents the adopted child with a false view of human sexual relationships. It teaches a child that it’s okay to have romantic relationships with members of the same sex.

But such relationships are contrary to our human good. Consequently, it does grave harm to children to bring them up in an environment where such relationships are promoted as a moral good. Rather than providing the child with proper human formation, which is the duty of every parent (whether biological or adoptive), it provides malformation.

This might sound unjust to some. But it’s unjust only if same-sex sexual relationships are morally good. In that case, there would be nothing wrong in principle with a same-sex couple adopting and raising a child. And to oppose a same-sex couple from adopting a child would be unjust.
But such relationships are not morally good. Therefore, there is no way in principle that it could be good for a same-sex couple to adopt a child. To oppose a same-sex couple adopting a child is no more of an injustice than it is to oppose a couple that has had a history of abusing children.

We must look out for the well-being of children. And since an environment where same-sex romantic relationships are promoted as good is not ordered to the well-being of a child, it ought to be avoided.



13-month-old baby boy Preston Davey was placed for adoption with a same-sex couple in Grimsargh. Within months, he was allegedly raped and killed.

Jamie Varley (36) faces murder, multiple sexual assaults on the child, cruelty, and extreme porn charges. His partner John McGowan-Fazakerley (31) also charged. Both plead not guilty.

The trial starts this month in Preston Crown Court.

How did social services think this was a safe home for a vulnerable baby?

Children’s needs must always come before adult desires.

Every child deserves a mother and father.

Praying for justice for little Preston.


Heartbreaking.

13-month-old baby boy Preston Davey was placed for adoption with a same-sex couple in Grimsargh. Within months, he was allegedly raped and killed.

Jamie Varley (36) faces murder, multiple sexual assaults on the child, cruelty, and extreme porn charges. His… pic.twitter.com/7kJpfLNPPD

— Lila Rose (@LilaGraceRose) April 7, 2026

Here are more details on the case. Warning: what follows is deeply disturbing.

BBC:

A former high school teacher has denied the murder and sexual assault of a baby boy.

Jamie Varley, 36, pleased not guilty to 33 charges relating to 13-month-old Preston Davey.

He was in the process of adopting the child with his co-accused, John McGowan-Fazakerley, 32, who denies four offences, and appeared at the same hearing at Preston Crown Court, both by videolink from HMP Durham.

The men spoke only to confirm their identities and deny the charges.

Preston’s mother sat sobbing in the public gallery of the courtroom as the charges were read out.

The men also stand accused of other horrific child predatory and abuse.

BBC:

Mr Varley denies the murder and manslaughter of Preston on 27 July 2023.

He has also pleaded not guilty to two counts of assault by penetration, five counts of cruelty and one count of grievous bodily harm.

And he denies 12 counts of taking an indecent photo of a child, two counts of making an indecent photo of a child and one count of distributing an indecent photo of a child.

All the charges, involving still images and videos, relate to Preston Davey and are alleged to have occurred between March and July 2023.

He also denies seven counts of possession of extreme pornography, between 2017 and July 2023.

Mr Varley is also jointly charged with Mr McGowan-Fazakerley with one count of the sexual assault of Preston Davey, which he denies.

His co-accused pleaded not guilty to the same offence and also denies two counts of cruelty and one count of allowing the death of a child.

The investigation started when baby Preston was brought to a hospital unresponsive. He died a short while later.
 

Texican

Live Free & Die Free.... God Freedom Country....
This innocent baby is now in Heaven with Jesus and God. Words can not adequately express the sadness.

-------------------------------

How horrible monsters these two POS's are to rape and murder an 18 month old baby.

These two POS's must have been kept separate from all other criminals in the jail where confined or the criminals in England need to grow a pair and make the trial unneeded.
 

energy_wave

Has No Life - Lives on TB
GtjC_WAXcAARRGq.png
 

Walrus

Has No Life - Lives on TB
The details of this story are impossible for a normal human brain to comprehend. And once again, this case, coming on the heels of many others like it, has people asking whether gay couples should be allowed to adopt children.
This is messed up.

There's no doubt that these people (LBGT-whatever) should not be allowed to adopt children, but they shouldn't be allowed to even be around them. That includes schooling, medical care, counseling, playgrounds or anything else.

One thing about it: when this nation is in full kinetic war amongst its citizens, we know who will form one of the most fanatic troops. I won't publicly say what my actions will be but nutbags beware.
 

Scrapman

Veteran Member
Shouldn't the government have checked there internet foot print. Or was the liberal that allowed this adoption to enthusiastic and giddy.
 

Tristan

TB Fanatic
I’d also bring the imbeciles up on charges that gave the nod to putting a boy baby with a homosexual couple. What were they thinking anyway?

They were thinking?

Nah. The Dopamine/Oxytocin hit was getting in the way.
 

223shootersc

Veteran Member
This will undoubtedly be the most chilling and disturbing story readers hear today, but as horrific as it is, it needs to be told, because this cannot happen to another child.


A gay couple stands accused of the rape and murder of their 13-month-old adopted son. They were charged months ago, and now the trial is set to begin on April 14, 2026, at Preston Crown Court.

The details of this story are impossible for a normal human brain to comprehend. And once again, this case, coming on the heels of many others like it, has people asking whether gay couples should be allowed to adopt children.

Italy has made it more difficult for gay couples to adopt children.

CBC:

Italy’s parliament made it illegal on Wednesday for couples to go abroad to have a baby via surrogacy — a pet project of Prime Minister’s Giorgia Meloni party that activists say is meant to target same-sex partners.

Since taking office in 2022, Meloni has pursued a highly conservative social agenda, looking to promote what she sees as “traditional family values,” making it progressively harder for LGBTQ+ couples to become legal parents.

Now, with this disturbing story resurfacing because of the upcoming trial, many are wondering what guardrails will be put in place to protect children. It is not only the number of cases involving child abuse and sexual assault that has people concerned, but also whether this is the right environment in which to raise children. Many same-sex couples may be struggling, and some believe that parenting and raising children becomes even more complicated when homosexuality is part of the household.

Catholic.com:

There are many reasons that we could give, such as how studies show that same-sex relationships have negative effects on children, but suffice it to say the fundamental reason is that it presents the adopted child with a false view of human sexual relationships. It teaches a child that it’s okay to have romantic relationships with members of the same sex.

But such relationships are contrary to our human good. Consequently, it does grave harm to children to bring them up in an environment where such relationships are promoted as a moral good. Rather than providing the child with proper human formation, which is the duty of every parent (whether biological or adoptive), it provides malformation.

This might sound unjust to some. But it’s unjust only if same-sex sexual relationships are morally good. In that case, there would be nothing wrong in principle with a same-sex couple adopting and raising a child. And to oppose a same-sex couple from adopting a child would be unjust.
But such relationships are not morally good. Therefore, there is no way in principle that it could be good for a same-sex couple to adopt a child. To oppose a same-sex couple adopting a child is no more of an injustice than it is to oppose a couple that has had a history of abusing children.

We must look out for the well-being of children. And since an environment where same-sex romantic relationships are promoted as good is not ordered to the well-being of a child, it ought to be avoided.



13-month-old baby boy Preston Davey was placed for adoption with a same-sex couple in Grimsargh. Within months, he was allegedly raped and killed.

Jamie Varley (36) faces murder, multiple sexual assaults on the child, cruelty, and extreme porn charges. His partner John McGowan-Fazakerley (31) also charged. Both plead not guilty.

The trial starts this month in Preston Crown Court.

How did social services think this was a safe home for a vulnerable baby?

Children’s needs must always come before adult desires.

Every child deserves a mother and father.

Praying for justice for little Preston.


Heartbreaking.

13-month-old baby boy Preston Davey was placed for adoption with a same-sex couple in Grimsargh. Within months, he was allegedly raped and killed.

Jamie Varley (36) faces murder, multiple sexual assaults on the child, cruelty, and extreme porn charges. His… pic.twitter.com/7kJpfLNPPD

— Lila Rose (@LilaGraceRose) April 7, 2026

Here are more details on the case. Warning: what follows is deeply disturbing.

BBC:

A former high school teacher has denied the murder and sexual assault of a baby boy.

Jamie Varley, 36, pleased not guilty to 33 charges relating to 13-month-old Preston Davey.

He was in the process of adopting the child with his co-accused, John McGowan-Fazakerley, 32, who denies four offences, and appeared at the same hearing at Preston Crown Court, both by videolink from HMP Durham.

The men spoke only to confirm their identities and deny the charges.

Preston’s mother sat sobbing in the public gallery of the courtroom as the charges were read out.

The men also stand accused of other horrific child predatory and abuse.

BBC:

Mr Varley denies the murder and manslaughter of Preston on 27 July 2023.

He has also pleaded not guilty to two counts of assault by penetration, five counts of cruelty and one count of grievous bodily harm.

And he denies 12 counts of taking an indecent photo of a child, two counts of making an indecent photo of a child and one count of distributing an indecent photo of a child.

All the charges, involving still images and videos, relate to Preston Davey and are alleged to have occurred between March and July 2023.

He also denies seven counts of possession of extreme pornography, between 2017 and July 2023.

Mr Varley is also jointly charged with Mr McGowan-Fazakerley with one count of the sexual assault of Preston Davey, which he denies.

His co-accused pleaded not guilty to the same offence and also denies two counts of cruelty and one count of allowing the death of a child.

The investigation started when baby Preston was brought to a hospital unresponsive. He died a short while later.I say a public lynching is in order!
I say a public lynching is in order for the sodomites
 

Publius

On TB every waking moment
How about the punishment fit the crime! Seeing how they like taking it up the ass how about impalement?
 

marsofold

Veteran Member
Publicly burn them to death alive and feed their bodies to pigs. Then confiscate the house, cars, pensions, and every single penny that their parents own for making such monsters. Then do the same to the judge that approved of the adoption.
 

marsofold

Veteran Member
No problem except for the parents part. Sometime children/ grandchildren are just bad. And I thank God for all mine (14) are great - so far!
The parents could eventually recover financially. Not the same for the baby. I believe that parents need to have some skin in the game for the way they raised such heartless monsters.
 
Last edited:

Old Greek

Veteran Member
The parents could eventually recover financially. Not the same for the baby. I believe that parents need to have some skin in the game for the way they raised such monster kids.
I will be 73 in another week. So if my 53 year old son did what these mid thirties looking animals did ( God forbid ) , I should be held resposible and bankrupted. Just want to understand?
 

marsofold

Veteran Member
I will be 73 in another week. So if my 53 year old son did what these mid thirties looking animals did ( God forbid ) , I should be held resposible and bankrupted. Just want to understand?
Those are not petty offenses. Your kids wouldn't ever do such a heartless thing because like most people, you were decent, moral and honorable in the way you raised them right. There might be million to one exceptions, but I could live with that being the law. And I'll also be 73 next month. Happy birthday in advance!
 

Old Greek

Veteran Member
Those are not petty offenses. Your kids wouldn't ever do such a heartless thing because you were decent, moral and honorable in the way you raised them right. There might be million to one exceptions, but I could live with that being the law. And I'll also be 73 next month.
Thanks - Happy early Birthday !
 
Top