CRIME Main Rittenhouse trial thread - NOT GUILTY ON ALL COUNTS

Sicario

The Executor
9e43533d50ba8c5a.png
 

vector7

Dot Collector

Sicario

The Executor
No..... just why he was there................by golly if I hear there is a riot by the left in a city near me I have no interest in going there unless say I owned a store nearby the protests.....then I'd go to defend my property and business.........was he doing the same?.....looks too young for that........what was his reason for being there?
Because he's a man, and because he CAN. Silly, archaic concept called FREEDOM!
 

OldArcher

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Thank God the jury acted with justice foremost in their minds. This should be a very clear and loud message to those who believe that the LibTurd method of life is worthless- as they are. People should arm-up, gear-up, train-up, and network with family and like minded friends. Kyle was almost the first legal casualty. Wanting to be a nurse, a health and care giver, keeps him in the crosshairs. Technically free, circumstances will conspire to forever be a target of EVIL. I pray that there will be those around him to strengthen, guard, and help him and his family. As the saying goes, “it ain’t over.” One can but hope that he and his have long, happy, healthy, and productive lives…

OA
 

artichoke

Greetings from near tropical NYC!
I know next to nothing about what happened here...............can anyone explain to me why he was in an area where their were protested to begin with?

Was he an anti protestor?........or defending something that he couldn't leave the area?

I'm trying to figure out why someone would bother being in an area with all those protestors if the didn't have to be there.

and is the left trying to claim this is a White supremist action when no people of color were killed?

But was one of the killed a chosenite?.......if so then he's the worst White supremist ever..........remember "never again"?

That mean no more White gentiles running the show ever again...........
Kyle had every right to defend the community where his father lived.

But you raise an interesting question: what WAS Ahmaud Arbery doing there in that neighborhood where he didn't live, then turning and attacking people on the street?
 

Red Baron

Paleo-Conservative
_______________
No..... just why he was there................by golly if I hear there is a riot by the left in a city near me I have no interest in going there unless say I owned a store nearby the protests.....then I'd go to defend my property and business.........was he doing the same?.....looks too young for that........what was his reason for being there?

Kyle's father is a native of Kenosha, WI.
 

To-late

Membership Revoked
www.breitbart.com/law-and-order/2021/11/19/verdict-kyle-rittenhouse-found-not-guilty-on-all-charges/

Verdict: Kyle Rittenhouse Found Not Guilty on All Charges

Joel B. Pollak4-4 minutes 11/19/2021


A jury in Kenosha, Wisconsin, found 18-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse not guilty of all charges on Friday.

The jury had deliberated since Tuesday morning. Rittenhouse was visibly moved by the announcement of the verdict.



Rittenhouse had faced two charges of murder, one charge of attempted murder, and two charges of reckless endangerment relating to a melée near midnight on August 25, 2020, during Black Lives Matter riots in the small Midwestern city.

That night, Rittenhouse and a group of armed volunteers were guarding a car dealership that had been torched the night before. After Rittenhouse put out a fire, he was chased by a rioter named James Rosenbaum, who reached for Rittenhouse’s AR-15-style rifle. Rittenhouse fired four times, hitting Rosenbaum and wounding him mortally. The shots also nearly hit Daily Caller journalist Richie McGinniss, who was covering the riots, though he was ultimately not wounded.

A crowd then gave chase as Rittenhouse attempted to flee toward police officers. He was struck in the head with a rock by an unknown assailant and kicked in the face by someone referred to as “Jump Kick Man,” whom Rittenhouse then shot at but missed. A rioter named Anthony Huber then hit Rittenhouse in the head and neck with a skateboard, and reached for the rifle; Rittenhouse fired one shot, killing him. Another rioter, Gaige Grosskreutz, who was armed with a pistol, raised his hands above his head, then charged Rittenhouse with his gun pointed at him. Rittenhouse fired, wounding Grosskreutz in the arm.

Corporate media and Democratic politicians such as then-candidate Joe Biden called Rittenhouse a “white supremacist” and described the violence as if he had set out to kill peaceful Black Lives Matter protesters. The prosecution in the trial called Rittenhouse an “active shooter” and argued that the mob, full of “heroes,” had been “entirely reasonable” to chase him.

The defense argued that Rittenhouse had acted in self-defense, in reasonable fear of imminent death or grievous bodily harm.

In addition, the defense had repeatedly argued for a mistrial. During the trial itself, the defense said that the prosecution had infringed on Rittenhouse’s Fifth Amendment rights by commenting on his post-arrest silence. The prosecutor also mentioned evidence that the judge had specifically ruled out of the trial. Judge Bruce Schroeder agreed, and admonished the prosecutor, but allowed the trial to continue, saying he would rule on the motion to dismiss later. Later, after the trial, while the jury deliberated, the defense filed another motion to dismiss, after the prosecution used a high-definition version of a video of events that the defense had never seen; the defense had only had access to a lower-definition version of the same footage.

Joel B. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News and the host of Breitbart News Sunday on Sirius XM Patriot on Sunday evenings from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. ET (4 p.m. to 7 p.m. PT). He is the author of the recent e-book, Neither Free nor Fair: The 2020 U.S. Presidential Election. His recent book, RED NOVEMBER, tells the story of the 2020 Democratic presidential primary from a conservative perspective. He is a winner of the 2018 Robert Novak Journalism Alumni Fellowship. Follow him on Twitter at @joelpollak.
“Verdict: Kyle Rittenhouse Found Not Guilty on All Charges”
I guess I can finally change my sig. below,,,now!
Yeeee haw!
 

Countrymouse

Country exile in the city
NOW - Biden "stands by" on the jury's decision in the Rittenhouse trial.

Biden added, "I feel great... And so I'm now looking forward to celebrating my 58th birthday."
RT 26secs
View: https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1461785289970622481?s=20

Wait until Kyle sues Biden for defamation
View: https://twitter.com/jeffy007bond/status/1461781961681391623?s=20
inflation.........
 

Countrymouse

Country exile in the city

Julie Kelly
@julie_kelly2


No. This is NOT a win for American justice. This is a horrific example of government prosecutors bringing bogus charges for political reasons. This is a disgraceful day for justice—thank God a dozen Americans exposed what a farce it was.

Not guilty verdicts don’t erase the media’s collective character assassination, Joe Biden’s contemptible comments, his family’s trauma, and the gaslighting this prosecution did to the country.
12:22 PM · Nov 19, 2021·Twitter for iPhone

True---but how much WORSE it would have been if those 12 brave jurors hadn't put a stop to it
 

IceWave

Veteran Member
Tonight we may well see a major failure in logic take place.

  • Rioting in support of BLM.
  • Racist white supremacist comes in and murder peaceful protestors.
  • Racist gets charged with murder (yay!).
  • Racist goes to trial and is acquitted (boo!).
  • Proves that the system protects racist white supremacist murderers.
  • Let's go riot tonight in protest!!!
  • Make surprised Pikachu face when other white supremacists don't agree to these shenanigans. We don't understand why they are fighting back even though we just said the system is rigged to protect them.
 

Countrymouse

Country exile in the city

summerthyme

Administrator
_______________
What was the significance of this statement at end by the Judge. If I'm not mistaken, its not standard with a not guilty verdict.

Its almost as if it has some legal meaning in the future in addition to the "not guilty"

Anyone know?
I don't *know*, but I think it closes the door on any possible appeal of the verdict by the prosecution...

Summerthyme
 
Top