CRIME Main Rittenhouse trial thread - NOT GUILTY ON ALL COUNTS

Lone_Hawk

Resident Spook
What was the significance of this statement at end by the Judge. If I'm not mistaken, its not standard with a not guilty verdict.

Its almost as if it has some legal meaning in the future in addition to the "not guilty"

Anyone know?

The judge said it specifically. I'm going to assume that it opens the door for Kyle to go after the DA also.
 

SmithJ

Veteran Member
The judge said it specifically. I'm going to assume that it opens the door for Kyle to go after the DA also.
Yes, I heard him. And I wondered why it was added at the end. I haven't heard any analyst mention it. It must have a specific reason. Let me know if you hear - I'll do the same.
 

Millwright

Knuckle Dragger
_______________
Dismissed With Prejudice Law and Legal Definition

A dismissal with prejudice is dismissal of a case on merits after adjudication.The plaintiff is barred from bringing an action on the same claim. Dismissal with prejudice is a final judgment and the case becomes res judicata on the claims that were or could have been brought in it.

A court has inherent power to dismiss an action with prejudice if it is vexatious, brought in bad faith, or when there has been a failure to prosecute it within a reasonable time. When a plaintiff who has commenced an action fails to comply with discovery devices, a court, which has issued the order of compliance, may sua sponte dismiss the case with prejudice.

In criminal prosecutions, dismissal with prejudice bars the government from prosecuting the accused later on the same charge. A dismissal with prejudice is made in response to a motion to the court by the defendant or by the court sua sponte, if the accused is deprived of the constitutional right to a speedy trial.

 

thompson

Certa Bonum Certamen
uuN7SGw.jpg


KmzjEiC.jpg
 

fi103r

Veteran Member
Will the feds try to throw some BS "civil rights" charges at him?
unlikely no ‘color of law’ and wrongful death suits wither on the crimminal aquittal eg unlikely for a civil court to accept wrongfull death suit with that HD video showing assialant(s) persuing Rittenhouse
color of law section 1983/84 us code title 42 civil charges
sect 1942/43 is crimminal code which Rittenhouse may use against the persecution/prostution of injustice
along with section 242 (criminal civil rights violations ‘no right to remain silent!!???’) fire up the high speed
check printer kaching!
 
Last edited:

Red Baron

Paleo-Conservative
_______________
Top