CRIME Main Rittenhouse trial thread - NOT GUILTY ON ALL COUNTS

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
'can' a private citizen sue the prez?
Public figure potentially in public service.

They can but defamation has to be EGREGIOUS - and possibly related to government action at their direction.

If the police chief hates your guts, has no call to malign you but does anyway, and then calls out the Popo on you simply to harass your ass - there is a case.

Dobbin
 

Betty_Rose

Veteran Member
Well his lawyer is going to be busy with civil suits for quite some time. All the defamation of character, slander, and libel is going to be fun to collect upon.


I sure hope you’re right. This case (the criminal case) should never have gone to trial.

And it’s time that the media learned how to SHUT THE EFF UP and stop trying cases in the media.
 

night driver

ESFP adrift in INTJ sea
1) It is INTENSELY difficult to sue POTUS. (Sovereign Immunity is actually a THING!)

2) They REALLY gonna get a new cat to take a kick at??
 

Krayola

Veteran Member
Random thoughts:

1) I am so happy and relieved for Kyle. I am still worried about what the Feds will try to do to him now. They will be out for blood.

2) I would hate to be living in the cities right now.

3) Why in the $%^& do they allow the jurors' faces to be shown on national TV? Or am I mistaken? Was the blond lady (shown on camera) who was reading out the verdict not a member of the jury? Was she an employee of the court? I hope she was the latter because, otherwise, they just doxed a member of the jury on national TV. No one will be willing to serve on juries like this if their identity is not protected.

ETA: info posted after this (later in the thread) indicates she was a not a member of the jury.
 
Last edited:

Countrymouse

Country exile in the city
Random thoughts:

1) I am so happy and relieved for Kyle. I am still worried about what the Feds will try to do to him now. They will be out for blood.

2) I would hate to be living in the cities right now.

3) Why in the $%^& do they allow the jurors' faces to be shown on national TV? Or am I mistaken? Was the blond lady (shown on camera) who was reading out the verdict not a member of the jury? Was she an employee of the court? I hope she was the latter because, otherwise, they just doxed a member of the jury on national TV. No one will be willing to serve on juries like this if their identity is not protected.

I heard on radio she was clerk of court.
 

artichoke

Greetings from near tropical NYC!
Here is an example of the melt down already.


Kyle Rittenhouse trial was designed to protect white conservatives who kill
The shooter’s homicide acquittal coddles conservatives and may lead to even more violence.

Nov. 19, 2021, 1:19 PM EST / Updated Nov. 19, 2021, 1:22 PM EST
By Ja'han Jones
Kyle Rittenhouse, who fatally shot two protesters and wounded a third during anti-police brutality demonstrations in Wisconsin last year, has been found not guilty of homicide — an outrageous yet unsurprising verdict in a trial marred by controversy.
Rittenhouse, who is white, was 17 when he traveled from his hometown in northeast Illinois to the protests in Kenosha, Wisconsin, last year armed with his semi-automatic rifle. On the night of Aug. 25, 2020, as he carried his gun through the streets, Rittenhouse shot dead Joseph Rosenbaum, 36, and Anthony Huber, 26, and wounded Gaige Grosskreutz, now 27.

Rittenhouse was found not guilty on all five charges he faced, which included first-degree intentional homicide, first-degree recklessly endangering safety and attempted first-degree intentional homicide.
The case had the makings of an acquittal before the trial even began. The outcome seemed clear even before an almost exclusively white jury pool was selected, even before Judge Bruce Schroeder created an uproar by ruling that the slain protesters could be referred to as “rioters” and “looters” but not “victims," even before Schroeder refused to punish Rittenhouse for what prosecutors said amounted to a violation of his bond conditions. Rittenhouse is a white teen who abides by white rules, and white people empathetic to those rules seemed poised to insulate him from repercussions.
The day he pleaded not guilty to felony homicide, Rittenhouse flashed a white supremacist symbol and was “loudly serenaded” by a group of men at a bar who belted out the anthem of the Proud Boys, a far-right extremist group, according to prosecutors.
On the night of the shooting, minutes before Rittenhouse opened fire, police in Kenosha thanked the rifle-toting teen and offered him water as he walked the streets. “We appreciate you guys, we really do,” one officer told him.
Law enforcement — including a department known to cover up its own lawless acts of violence — seemed to give cover to Rittenhouse from the get-go.
With these endorsements, white conservatives felt all the more comfortable swaddling Rittenhouse in the protection they often give to police and vigilantes serving white conservative interests — from George Zimmerman to Mark and Patricia McCloskey. Rittenhouse is just their latest darling, pitifully seeing heroism in an armed teen who set out to patrol pro-Black protests as though he were police.
Pitiful as they are, we can’t dismiss his supporters as conservatives merely taking sides in a political squabble. Last year, then-President Donald Trump’s administration issued talking points to Homeland Security officials claiming Rittenhouse went to Kenosha to “defend small business owners.” Conservative media figures have eagerly repeated those claims. Their support for Rittenhouse isn’t a counterweight to progressive social policies like equitable policing — their support is a physical threat to people supporting those policies.
Conservatives are encouraging white vigilantes like Rittenhouse to police progressive spaces by all means. As one Slate article put it last year, “'Own the Libs' Is Gradually Morphing Into 'Kill the Libs.'”
The jury’s decision was a dangerous endorsement of that vision.
"Conservatives are encouraging white vigilantes like Rittenhouse to police progressive spaces by all means. As one Slate article put it last year, “'Own the Libs' Is Gradually Morphing Into 'Kill the Libs.'”

The jury’s decision was a dangerous endorsement of that vision."

Well I certainly endorse policing "progressive spaces" that are actually owned by others or the public, such as businesses and streets in Kenosha. If this obviously correct verdict supports that vision, that's wonderful and important! Let's take that idea and run with it.
 

Countrymouse

Country exile in the city
"Conservatives are encouraging white vigilantes like Rittenhouse to police progressive spaces by all means. As one Slate article put it last year, “'Own the Libs' Is Gradually Morphing Into 'Kill the Libs.'”

The jury’s decision was a dangerous endorsement of that vision."

Well I certainly endorse policing "progressive spaces" that are actually owned by others or the public, such as businesses and streets in Kenosha. If this obviously correct verdict supports that vision, that's wonderful and important! Let's take that idea and run with it.

But the ones who were DESTROYING people's LIVELIHOODS by BURNING DOWN their businesses--were 'not' vigilantes.

Uh huh.
 

vector7

Dot Collector
The Communist Revolutionaries true colors are showing...

“We can’t let this go.” What are you gonna do, Mayor? This sounds like incitement to violence.

angry-bill-de-blasio-780x470.png


Bill de Blasio: This verdict is disgusting and it sends a horrible message to this country.

Where is the justice in this?

We can't let this go. We need stronger laws to stop violent extremism from within our own nation.

Now is the time.
View: https://twitter.com/stillgray/status/1461768040551358468?s=20
 

TheSearcher

Are you sure about that?
The Communist Revolutionaries true colors are showing...

“We can’t let this go.” What are you gonna do, Mayor? This sounds like incitement to violence.

angry-bill-de-blasio-780x470.png


Bill de Blasio: This verdict is disgusting and it sends a horrible message to this country.

Where is the justice in this?

We can't let this go. We need stronger laws to stop violent extremism from within our own nation.

Now is the time.
View: https://twitter.com/stillgray/status/1461768040551358468?s=20

Deblahzeeoh is such a shitty piece of trash.
 

Mprepared

Veteran Member
The Communist Revolutionaries true colors are showing...

“We can’t let this go.” What are you gonna do, Mayor? This sounds like incitement to violence.

angry-bill-de-blasio-780x470.png


Bill de Blasio: This verdict is disgusting and it sends a horrible message to this country.

Where is the justice in this?

We can't let this go. We need stronger laws to stop violent extremism from within our own nation.

Now is the time.
View: https://twitter.com/stillgray/status/1461768040551358468?s=20

The message is we still have freedom and courts of law, at least today we did.
 

Pinecone

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Random thoughts:

1) I am so happy and relieved for Kyle. I am still worried about what the Feds will try to do to him now. They will be out for blood.

2) I would hate to be living in the cities right now.

3) Why in the $%^& do they allow the jurors' faces to be shown on national TV? Or am I mistaken? Was the blond lady (shown on camera) who was reading out the verdict not a member of the jury? Was she an employee of the court? I hope she was the latter because, otherwise, they just doxed a member of the jury on national TV. No one will be willing to serve on juries like this if their identity is not protected.
The blonde woman was a member of the court. I didn't see any of the juror's faces.
 

Countrymouse

Country exile in the city
I completely agree Wilhelm! Rioters and arsonists need to go to prison for 20 years minimum. EVERY SINGLE TIME.

That was MY first thought too, Dennis! I hope everyone here with a Twitter account goes online and PUTS THAT VERY ANSWER in a 'comment' tweet to his (I can't do that from work as I don't remember my p/w for Twitter)
 
Top