CRIME Main Rittenhouse trial thread - NOT GUILTY ON ALL COUNTS

Buick Electra

TB2K Girls with Guns

Case Against Kyle Rittenhouse Collapses As Key Attacker Admits Rittenhouse Did Not Shoot Until Witness Pointed a Gun At Him
November 8, 2021 | Sundance | 56 Comments

Gaige Grosskreutz was one of the attackers of Kyle Rittenhouse in Kenosha Wisconsin last year. After giving testimony earlier today attempting to paint himself as a victim of Rittenhouse, the witness/attacker admitted today in during cross examination he was shot only after he threatened Rittenhouse by pointing a gun at him inches away from his head.

While the prosecution hoped Grosskreutz’s sketchy testimony would assist their case, the actual testimony supports the defense claim of Rittenhouse acting in self defense after being attacked by a mob. The crushing admission is below (prompted to 08:10) WATCH:

[R/T] 13:47

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1DNDf75CUFs


The prosecution case just collapsed. Rittenhouse, now 18, is charged with homicide and attempted homicide for shooting three people during the Kenosha riots as the mob attacked him. Rittenhouse shot and killed 36-year-old Joseph Rosenbaum, 26-year-old Anthony Huber, and wounded Gaige Grosskreutz. All of the people shot by Rittenhouse were attacking him at the time.

gaige-grosskreutz-and-Prosecution-V2.jpg
 

Buick Electra

TB2K Girls with Guns
It's just one case, one kid and one gun. Maybe it will matter more than the sum of its parts, but I will be surprised if it does.

As is, Kyle should expect federal charges next, especially if acquitted. Lawfare doesn’t throw in the towel easily and the Communists definitely don’t want citizens taking out their mercenaries in self-defense and getting away with it. It ain’t over yet.
 

Troke

On TB every waking moment
Hmm! Diccolo Trochiavellie is thinking. Could be the State does not want him because they figure the Feds will nail him and he is in prison on their nickel? Stranger things have happened. But a "not guilty" verdict might make that hard to do.

The whole lashup is strange. I can't believe the prosecution is that incompetent. There must be more.
 

Griz3752

Retired, practising Curmudgeon
The whole lashup is strange. I can't believe the prosecution is that incompetent. There must be more.
You're right there but we won't get a real good read on the whole thing until this plays out .....
 
Last edited:

Dennis Olson

Chief Curmudgeon
_______________
As is, Kyle should expect federal charges next, especially if acquitted. Lawfare doesn’t throw in the towel easily and the Communists definitely don’t want citizens taking out their mercenaries in self-defense and getting away with it. It ain’t over yet.
Unfortunately, every word of this is true. The Marxists will prosecute EVERY SINGLE TIME a lowly serf dares do defend themselves against attacks by their henchmen. look at what this has cost already. Bail alone cost him $100,000 (the fee for a million $ bond.) and probably a half million in legal fees. The goal is that demoralize the serfs. Think about this in terms of you and your family. You think that wouldn’t give you pause in one of those riot events?
 

BadMedicine

Would *I* Lie???
So how do you bring a prosecutor up on misconduct? kidnapping? They have all he power of the state. all the trust. all the laws are on the books, they swore to defend.

and this? f*cking this?

That prosecutor is as guilty as the rotten corpses from this trial. All 3 cases were cut and dried, and no charges on grosskruetz AN ACTUAL ATTACKER?

Hopefully that kinda anti american shit doesn't go unnoticed.
 

Mephib

Senior Member
There is no federal case where there is no “state action” responsible for the sec 1983 crime. You only have state action where you have state actors, such as police or government bureaucrats. Only by donning the mantle of governmental authority can an individual be named as a Sec 1983 defendant.

Therefore, if Kyle walks in this case, he should be clear.
 

Buick Electra

TB2K Girls with Guns

Case Against Kyle Rittenhouse Collapses As Key Attacker Admits Rittenhouse Did Not Shoot Until Witness Pointed a Gun At Him
November 8, 2021 | Sundance | 56 Comments

Gaige Grosskreutz was one of the attackers of Kyle Rittenhouse in Kenosha Wisconsin last year. After giving testimony earlier today attempting to paint himself as a victim of Rittenhouse, the witness/attacker admitted today in during cross examination he was shot only after he threatened Rittenhouse by pointing a gun at him inches away from his head.

While the prosecution hoped Grosskreutz’s sketchy testimony would assist their case, the actual testimony supports the defense claim of Rittenhouse acting in self defense after being attacked by a mob. The crushing admission is below (prompted to 08:10) WATCH:

[R/T] 13:47

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1DNDf75CUFs


The prosecution case just collapsed. Rittenhouse, now 18, is charged with homicide and attempted homicide for shooting three people during the Kenosha riots as the mob attacked him. Rittenhouse shot and killed 36-year-old Joseph Rosenbaum, 26-year-old Anthony Huber, and wounded Gaige Grosskreutz. All of the people shot by Rittenhouse were attacking him at the time.

gaige-grosskreutz-and-Prosecution-V2.jpg

If you watched the above video, the Defense asked Grosskreutz about his friend visiting him in the hospital and some picture that was posted but has since been taken down. Here is that picture....

https://i.postimg.cc/xTXT8FDK/2-C1735-A7-E17-A-4456-864-E-7-C26096001-F7.jpg


Boy 1.JPG

Boy 2.JPG
 

Old Gray Mare

TB Fanatic
So Grosskreutz admits to running up to Kyle, who is sitting on his butt on the ground with the muzzle of his gun pointing down. Grosskreutz then points his gun at Kyle where on Kyle raised the muzzle of his gun and shoots Grosskreutz.

My question is why is Grosskreutz not on trial? He admitted to pointing a loaded weapon at a minor who was no immediate threat to him or anyone else.
 

vestige

Deceased
So Grosskreutz admits to running up to Kyle, who is sitting on his butt on the ground with the muzzle of his gun pointing down. Grosskreutz then points his gun at Kyle where on Kyle raised the muzzle of his gun and shoots Grosskreutz.

My question is why is Grosskreutz not on trial? He admitted to pointing a loaded weapon at a minor who was no immediate threat to him or anyone else.
It doesn't help the narrative.
 

ShadowMan

Designated Grumpy Old Fart
He needs to be found NOT GUILTY!! If they just drop the case.....they could attempt to retry him over and over and over again until they do get a guilty verdict. Rittenhouse needs to follow this through until he is firmly declared NOT-GUILTY and then he can't be retried on these counts....PERIOD.

However, comma - I would not be surprised if the Fed's went after him on Civil Rights violations if he walks free on this. (Or they might try to put child porn on his phone or computer.......nothing surprises me anymore.)
 

summerthyme

Administrator
_______________
There is no federal case where there is no “state action” responsible for the sec 1983 crime. You only have state action where you have state actors, such as police or government bureaucrats. Only by donning the mantle of governmental authority can an individual be named as a Sec 1983 defendant.

Therefore, if Kyle walks in this case, he should be clear.
What about "violating their Civil rights"? Seems to be a popular made-up charge.

Summerthyme
 

Sicario

The Executor
So Grosskreutz admits to running up to Kyle, who is sitting on his butt on the ground with the muzzle of his gun pointing down. Grosskreutz then points his gun at Kyle where on Kyle raised the muzzle of his gun and shoots Grosskreutz.

My question is why is Grosskreutz not on trial? He admitted to pointing a loaded weapon at a minor who was no immediate threat to him or anyone else.
Grosskreutz also admitted under oath that he was carrying a concealed weapon without a valid CCW permit. He was NOT charged for that offense.
 

Bps1691

Veteran Member
There is no federal case where there is no “state action” responsible for the sec 1983 crime. You only have state action where you have state actors, such as police or government bureaucrats. Only by donning the mantle of governmental authority can an individual be named as a Sec 1983 defendant.

Therefore, if Kyle walks in this case, he should be clear.

Except the leftists will hound him to death!

Darren Wilson's career and life were ruined, arsons and worse were done and supported by the "officals" all over an outright lie at Ferguson, MO!

They hate us (being anyone not them) and want us all dead or in servitude as worse than serfs.
 

Jeep

Veteran Member
Just remember what those bastards tried to do to Zimmerman, but he did bring some of that on himself by acting stupid after he was found no guilty.
 
Top