CORONA Highly cited COVID doctor comes to stunning conclusion: Gov’t ‘scrubbing unprecedented numbers’ of injection-related deaths

Cardinal

Chickministrator
_______________

3,544 deaths and 12,619 serious injuries reported between Dec. 14, 2020 and April 23, 2021
One of the world’s most prominent medical doctors with expertise in treating COVID-19 has gone on the record with a scathing rebuke of the U.S. government’s approach to fighting the virus. He says the government’s strategy, carried out in cooperation with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the United Nations World Health Organization, has resulted in tens of thousands of unnecessary deaths and is now being followed up with thousands more deaths caused by a mass-injection program.

Dr. Peter McCullough, in a 32-minute interview with journalist Alex Newman, said if this were any other vaccine it would have been pulled from the market by now for safety reasons.
McCullough holds the honor of being the most cited medical doctor on COVID-19 treatments at the National Library of Medicine, with more than 600 citations. He has testified before Congress and won numerous awards during his distinguished medical career.

Between Dec. 14 and April 23, there were 3,544 deaths reported to the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System [VAERS], along with 12,619 serious injuries.
One might expect these numbers would trigger an exhaustive investigation from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. But the opposite has occurred. According to McCullough, the government has taken what amounts to a passing glance at the alarming numbers and dismissed them with a bare minimum of scrutiny.

“A typical new drug at about five deaths, unexplained deaths, we get a black-box warning, your listeners would see it on TV, saying it may cause death,” McCullough said. “And then at about 50 deaths it’s pulled off the market.”
The U.S. has a precedent for this. In 1976 during the Swine Flu pandemic the U.S. attempted to vaccinate 55 million Americans, but at that point the shot caused about 500 cases of paralysis and 25 deaths.
“The program was killed, at 25 deaths,” McCullough said.

Compare that type of response to the government’s reaction to much higher reported death numbers related to the Moderna and Pfizer shots and the contrast is alarming, McCullough said, especially when the shots have not even been granted full FDA approval and are only being allowed on the market under an Emergency Use Authorization.
“In the U.S. today [as of late March] we have approximately 77 million people vaccinated for COVID and we have 2,602 deaths reported, so it’s unprecedented how many deaths have accrued,” he said.

“Then on March 8 the CDC announced on their website with very little fanfare, that they had reviewed about 1,600 deaths with unnamed FDA doctors and they indicated not a single death was related to the vaccine,” he added. “I think that was concerning in the academic community.”
McCullough said he knows from first-hand experience that doing a thorough investigation into 1,600 potentially vaccine-related deaths would have taken months to complete.

“I have chaired and participated in dozens of data safety monitoring boards and sat on those committees and I can tell you that this type of work would have taken many months to review all the labs, the death certificates and all the circumstances of an event. It is impossible for unnamed regulatory doctors without any experience with COVID 19 to opine that none of the deaths were related to the vaccine.”
Previous studies, including one from Harvard University, estimate that only 1 to 10 percent of all vaccine-related deaths get reported to VAERS. So in all likelihood, there are more people dying than even gets reported, yet the FDA can’t come up with a single death related to the Moderna and Pfizer shots.

“Reporting a death requires a healthcare worker to enter it into the system,” he said. And if the death does not occur within the normal 15-minute monitoring period they often go unreported. Most deaths occur within 72 hours of the shot. “They pile up on day one, two and three,” he said.
As a matter of comparison: There are 20 to 30 deaths reported every year to VAERS related to the flu shot. That’s with 195 million receiving flu shots. Compare that to the COVID shot, which resulted in 2,602 reported deaths through 77 million vaccinations.

That’s a stunningly high ratio of deaths to vaccinations, the highest for any vaccine in U.S. history, and yet no major media outlet has launched an investigation. Independent journalists and researchers such as Alex Newman, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Leo Hohmann have been ruthlessly censored.
“So the U.S. government has made a decision, along with the stakeholders – the CDC, NIH, FDA, Big Pharma, World Health Organization, Gates Foundation – they have made a commitment to mass vaccination as the solution to the COVID pandemic and we are really going to be witness to what’s going to happen in history. We’re sitting on, right now, the biggest number of vaccine deaths, there’s been tens of thousands of hospitalizations, all attributable to the vaccine, and going strong.”

McCullough testified before the U.S. Senate on Nov 19, 2020.
“I estimated at that time we could have saved half of the lives lost,” he told Newman. “There are now current estimates that we are up to about 85 percent of all lives lost could have been saved with something called sequenced oral multi-drug therapy.”
But instead, the government and its “stakeholders” in Big Pharma chose to focus on vaccines. At the same time, news organizations were recruited to present only one side of the vaccine story.

Mainstream outlets have agreed to not allow any news critical of the shots to reach the American people. This corrupt collusion falls under the Trusted News Initiative, a global collaboration signed onto by Big Tech social-media giants and many of its corrupt corporate media “partners.”
The partners signed onto the Trusted News Initiative to date are: Associated Press, AFP; BBC, CBC/Radio-Canada, European Broadcasting Union (EBU), Facebook, Financial Times, First Draft, Google/YouTube, The Hindu, Microsoft, Reuters, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, Twitter, The Washington Post. The New York Times has also participated in the past.

Reporting facts related to the dark side of the experimental mRNA vaccines is considered “dangerous disinformation” by the globalist media elites behind the Trusted News Initiative.

Dr. McCullough describes ‘whitewash of historic proportions
“So I think this was effectively a scrubbing, like we’ve seen elsewhere. There is a Trusted News Initiative, which is very important for Americans to understand, this was announced Dec. 10, and this is a coalition of all the major media and government stakeholders in vaccination, where they are not going to allow any negative information about vaccines to get into the popular media because they’re concerned about vaccine hesitancy, that if Americans got any type of fair, balanced coverage on safety events then they simply would not come forward and get the vaccine.”

“The Trusted News Initiative is really troublesome,” he continued, “because we’re now at record numbers of deaths, they continue to occur every day.”
Confirming a LeoHohmann.com report from earlier this month, McCullough said the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, while it does have issues with blood clots, is actually the safest of the three vaccines now being offered to Americans.

“In my professional opinion, the safest vaccine on the market was the J&J vaccine. And that was pulled for very rare blood-clotting events. We had seven million people vaccinated but the estimates are for the other two vaccines available, the blood-clotting rates are probably 30 times that of J&J, and these others are going strong.”

McCullough suggested that there is an incestuous relationship between the U.S. government and certain elements within Big Pharma, which causes regulators to look the other way when confronted with safety issues.
“A lot of Americans don’t understand how tight these stakeholders are. Keep in mind the NIH [National Institutes of Health] is a co-owner of the Moderna patent, so they have a vested financial interest in keeping these vaccines going,” he said.

More than 15 months into the COVID nightmare, the evidence is beginning to suggest the U.S. government colluded from the outset with the Gates Foundation, CDC, FDA, the United Nations World Health Organization and Big Pharma to make the vaccines the central focus of the global COVID response effort. They started promoting the vaccines before they were even out of clinical trials, McCullough said, which is against U.S. regulatory law.

More reports of high death counts
LeoHohmann.com has been getting reports that confirm Dr. McCullough’s warning that harmful events caused by the vaccine are being covered up by the medical establishment, the government, the legacy media and social-media giants Google, Facebook and Twitter.
A physician with a practice in the Kansas City area told LeoHohmann.com that of a recent 500-person sampling of nursing-home patients who received the COVID injection, 22 died within 48 hours. That represents an astonishing 4.4 percent death rate. Most people in the Kansas City area nursing homes are receiving the Pfizer shot, he said.

“I can’t prove they all died of the vaccine, all I can prove is it happened within 48 hours,” the physician told LeoHohmann.com.
“The requirements are they only need to be monitored for 15 minutes. So we are never going to know the real numbers,” he said. “If it happens outside of that 15-minute window it’s going to be impossible to prove… If the FDA approves this then God help us.”

The Kansas City physician requested his name not be revealed for fear that he could lose his medical license.
A Canadian doctor, Dr. Charles Hoffe, recently broke his silence and went public in defiance of a gag order, blowing the whistle on how “Moderna shots killed, disabled patients.”

McCollough said the government has never placed a focus on treating sick patients, choosing instead to focus on the WHO recommended strategy of social distancing, lockdowns, masking and vaccines. If the strategy had focused instead on a regimen that includes a multi-drug treatment of early onset symptoms, tens of thousands of lives could have been saved, he said.

In a December 2020 paper, A Guide for Home-Based COVID-19 treatment: Step by step doctor’s plan that could save your life, McCullough prescribes a four-pronged strategy that includes contagion control, early home treatment, late-stage treatment and lastly vaccination.

“I talked about the four pillars, with the first pillar being contagion control [wearing masks and lockdowns]. We’ve spent a lot of time on that. But really the missing pillar, if we would have spent our time focusing on sick patients, that would have had the highest public-health value.
“But what happened in the U.S. was we developed a game plan …that we were going to promote the importance of social distancing as part of contagion control and just have the population wait for a vaccine. There have been no updates on treatment, not outpatient, not inpatient. We don’t hear anything about sick patients. All we heard was about masking, lockdowns and wait for a vaccine.”
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
So just like all deaths including dogbite, being thrown from a horse, or fall from a ladder became "Covid Death" now all deaths normally attributed to the Vaccination now become something else?

Unfortunately it makes sense given how your government is managing you.

Dobbin
 

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap
Face masks do more harm than good, NEW Stanford study finds
by: Sara Middleton, staff writer | May 1, 2021

(NaturalHealth365) This week, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released updated guidelines regarding the use of face masks. Among their Big Brother-esque guidelines: people who have received the COVID shot are now “allowed” to go maskless while at small outdoor gatherings.

These guidelines are already questionable to the millions of Americans who have been simply focusing on their health and living their lives throughout the pandemic. But in light of a recently published and highly “controversial” paper highlighting the many adverse effects of face masks, the idea that a government would even offer mask guidelines in the first place is more worrisome than ever.

Effectiveness of masks remains highly questionable — meanwhile, the case against widespread mask use gets stronger and more concerning
In January 2021, the peer-reviewed journal Medical Hypotheses published a paper by a man named Baruch Vainshelboim, titled “Facemasks in the COVID-19 era: A health hypothesis.” According to his public LinkedIn profile, Vainshelboim is a Clinical Exercise Physiologist; however, in the paper itself, he claims affiliation with the Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System and Stanford University in California.

According to Stanford Medicine (in a public statement, this affiliation is misleading (in a public statement, they admit that Vainshelboim had a “one-year term as a visiting scholar” in 2016). But in a classic throwing-the-baby-out-with-the-bath-water move, mainstream media has now jumped on this opportunity to attack the author and completely discredit the paper in its entirety.

Are face masks harmful to your health? Findings from a NEW study may shock you
It’s not hard to imagine why — the scientific data he cites and summarizes does NOT fit the narrative which claims that face masks (along with COVID shots) are required to end the pandemic. (Of course, you certainly won’t see this type of scrutiny over studies cited by CDC as evidence that face masks do work.)

Looking past the paper’s byline, let’s review some potential drawbacks to face mask use, as summarized by scientific data cited in the heavily lambasted Medical Hypotheses paper:

  • Hypoxia (decreased oxygen in the blood)
  • Shortness of breath
  • Activated fear and stress response
  • Increased stress hormones
  • Immunosuppression
  • Fatigue
  • Headaches
  • Decreased cognitive performance
  • For kids, lack of access to lip-reading and non-verbal cues that are essential to healthy psychosocial development
Now, even if we are willing to set aside these damaging adverse effects, we are still faced with the reality that there is insufficient evidence from randomized controlled trials showing that masks actually work. And Vainshelboim isn’t the only one sounding the alarm over mask use.

A jaw-dropping list of randomized controlled trials cited by Denis G. Rancourt, Ph.D., a researcher with the Ontario Civil Liberties Association, failed to consistently show that masks significantly prevent the spread of infectious diseases among healthcare workers or community members. By the way, if you just read the outside of a face mask box … it says, ‘they are ineffective at protecting against the spread of COVID-19.’

CDC ignores science, continues to push mask mandates with no sufficient evidence to support their use
Despite all this evidence, the CDC continues to advise all people aged 2 years and older to wear masks in a majority of cases. Meanwhile, both UNICEF and the World Health Organization (WHO) clearly state that children under 5 “should not be required to wear masks” and that deciding whether children aged 6 to 11 should wear masks must weigh factors such as “the ability of the child to safely and appropriately use a mask” and the “potential impact of wearing a mask on learning and psychosocial development.”

One of the (for better or for worse) leading health authorities throughout the pandemic admits on their website that masks have a potentially harmful impact on its wearers — yet they offer no evidence as to why being 12 years old or older magically makes these health risks disappear.

The bottom line on face masks: Burden of proof lies with health authorities
It’s clear, despite what mainstream media and Fauci followers want you to believe:

Numerous scientific studies demonstrate that not only there is insufficient evidence that masks are effective at reducing transmission rates, but instead, there is significant and compelling evidence to the contrary. Face masks may cause harm by triggering immediate and long-term physiologic and psychological effects that can both weaken the immune system and harm human health.

There is NO scientific evidence showing that non-professional use of face masks is effective at preventing the spread of microscopic COVID viral particles — yet governments and health organizations have been mandating their use for over a year now. Not only that, but according to CNN and other major news outlets, some public health experts even criticize the CDC’s new mask guidelines for being “too cautious,” meaning they aren’t enough to incentivize people to sign up for the COVID shot.

Read that again. We have mainstream media saying that mask mandates should be modified in order to convince people to take an experimental drug.

This is nonsense, and it must stop. The burden of proof should be on the health authorities and the government for determining how effective and safe face masks are.

Sources for this article include:

ACPjournals.org
WHO.int
RCreader.com
ScienceDirect.com
CDC.gov
CNN.com
Stanford.edu
OCLA.ca

 

ChicagoMan74

ULTRA MAGA
I'm getting tired of this argument, but just adding this tidbit before all the breathless "the vaccines are killing more than the disease itself" all get here.

# of people fully vaccinated from COVID-19 in the U.S. (as of this date) about 100 milliion

# of people that died according to this article: 3,544

Percentage of people that died from COVID vaccines: 3544/100,000,000 = .00003544 or .003544 %

To me, it looks like the eugenicists aren't trying hard enough.
 

subnet

Boot
I'm getting tired of this argument, but just adding this tidbit before all the breathless "the vaccines are killing more than the disease itself" all get here.

# of people fully vaccinated from COVID-19 in the U.S. (as of this date) about 100 milliion

# of people that died according to this article: 3,544

Percentage of people that died from COVID vaccines: 3544/100,000,000 = .00003544 or .003544 %

To me, it looks like the eugenicists aren't trying hard enough.
Anndddddd missed the point entirely........
Or just immune to massive hypocrisy and suffering from a slight case of normalcy bias
 

The Mountain

Here since the beginning
_______________
Anndddddd missed the point entirely........
Or just immune to massive hypocrisy and suffering from a slight case of normalcy bias

No, he's pre-empting the people who are set on the idea that the vax actually kills more than the disease, and showing that it does not. He is not disputing the OP which points out that deaths from the vax are more than a hundred times higher than e.g. deaths from the flu vaccine.

ETA: it would probably be instructive, however, to see if it was possible to collate all the deaths stemming from vaccine, lockdown, masking and other useless "prevention" measures to see if *those* were higher than the actual virus deaths. One would have to weed out all the confounding "virus" death data that was actually counting heart disease, motorcycle accidents, strokes etc to try to obtain as clean a "virus death" number as possible.
 

ChicagoMan74

ULTRA MAGA
He is not disputing the OP which points out that deaths from the vax are more than a hundred times higher than e.g. deaths from the flu vaccine.

Even if it IS 100 times more...then you are looking at a number that went from .00003544 % (perceived percentage of death) to .003544 %

Again....perspective.
 
Last edited:

Border Collie Dad

Flat Earther
ETA: it would probably be instructive, however, to see if it was possible to collate all the deaths stemming from vaccine, lockdown, masking and other useless "prevention" measures to see if *those* were higher than the actual virus deaths. One would have to weed out all the confounding "virus" death data that was actually counting heart disease, motorcycle accidents, strokes etc to try to obtain as clean a "virus death" number as possible.

I think I read that exact info this morning.
Now, if I can only find it again
 
I’ll see your 3,544 and raise you...
300,000 preventable COVID deaths: A sad reflection
Our great nation, the United States, for all its ideals, has not enacted a public health policy of early outpatient treatment for COVID-19. Despite compelling evidence that repurposed drugs can and do prevent deaths, there is no FDA or NIH guidance to the public or physicians to offer patients anything else except vaccines and ventilators, masks, and lockdowns.

Our sad official policy is to sicken at home. If one turns blue or cannot breathe, the FDA policy is only then to enter the hospital. No specific drug treatment is advised at home despite incontrovertible scientific data that it works.

Distinguished Yale Epidemiologist Professor Harvey Risch first advised such treatment on May 27, 2020, in the American Journal of Epidemiology, when US deaths stood at less than 100,000. Dr. Risch once again called for early outpatient treatment on July 23, 2020, in an Op-Ed published in Newsweek Magazine.

Finally, on November 19, 2020, Dr. Risch joined with two other highly respected physicians, Dr. Peter McCullough and Dr. George Fareed, and they testified historically before the US Senate strongly urging the use of early outpatient treatment with the triple therapy of an antiviral, an antibiotic, and Zinc.

At that point, deaths in our nation were only at about 250,000. Today, as of April 1, 2021, they stand at nearly 560,000. Nearly 300,000 lives could have been saved had early outpatient treatment been adopted by US public health agencies in November of 2020. Some 450,000 lives, almost half a million, could have been saved had they done so when Dr. Risch first advised in May of 2020.

"History will not look kindly on us," says Dr. Peter McCullough. When all is said and done, and future generations ask, "Really, you did not offer to treat them?" - Because the government said not to do so. And you were aware of the data on Ivermectin? And Vitamin D, Zinc, and Hydroxychloroquine?

You saw that 27 randomized controlled studies all showed a mortality reduction of large magnitude. You saw that there was at least a 68% reduction in death with Ivermectin use - and you failed to recommend or even inform patients?

Yes. This period will go down in history as one of the darkest episodes for physicians.

We cannot defend it - we cannot explain it - and we cannot escape it. On December 13, 2020, just five days after Dr. Pierre Kory's passionate testimony was delivered to the US Senate, I coined the term, the “Kory Count.”

The Kory Count was begun to memorialize permanently the needless deaths resulting from a failure in public health policy, those deaths that could have been prevented if only the testimony by expert physicians had been heeded.

Dr. Pierre Kory stated that any deaths then (as of December 8, 2020), knowing that early outpatient treatment is life-saving, are preventable. The Kory Count is the running tally of the number of COVID-19 deaths that could have been prevented using such early outpatient treatment. Dr. Peter McCullough asked the FDA to approve early outpatient treatment on November 19, 2020 - including the use of Ivermectin.

So today on April 1, 2021, I update the Kory Count. It is out of reverence to those lost, those people whose lives could have been saved had early outpatient treatment become the health care policy of the land on November 19, 2020.

Dennis Prager has said to doctors collectively, "Shame on you." For physicians everywhere to know the truth, to know the results of numerous meta-analyses now completed by Dr. Tess Lawrie, Dr. Andrew Hill, and Dr. Pierre Kory on Ivermectin - and to know that deaths are reduced dramatically when this is used early and even late in the disease - and to not offer it to all high-risk patients, is unethical and contrary to our Hippocratic oath.

The reasons the WHO and FDA have rejected Ivermectin have nothing to do with science and everything to do with corruption by Big Pharma. I now update the Kory Count as it closes in on 300,000 preventable deaths:

Beginning Kory Count as of 03/09/21: 274,996

03/10/21: 1447

03/11/21: 1522

03/12/21: 1757

03/13/21: 1846

03/14/21: 572

03/15/21: 751

03/16/21: 1245

03/17/21: 1177

03/18/21: 1558

03/19/21: 1513

03/20/21: 773

03/21/21: 444

03/22/21: 650

03/23/21: 892

03/24/21: 1591

03/25/21: 1270

03/26/21: 1260

03/27/21: 780

03/28/21: 487

03/29/21: 685

03/30/21: 948

03/31/21: 1138

Current Kory Count: 299,252
 

SmithJ

Veteran Member
I’ll see your 3,544 and raise you...
300,000 preventable COVID deaths: A sad reflection
Our great nation, the United States, for all its ideals, has not enacted a public health policy of early outpatient treatment for COVID-19. Despite compelling evidence that repurposed drugs can and do prevent deaths, there is no FDA or NIH guidance to the public or physicians to offer patients anything else except vaccines and ventilators, masks, and lockdowns.

Our sad official policy is to sicken at home. If one turns blue or cannot breathe, the FDA policy is only then to enter the hospital. No specific drug treatment is advised at home despite incontrovertible scientific data that it works.

Distinguished Yale Epidemiologist Professor Harvey Risch first advised such treatment on May 27, 2020, in the American Journal of Epidemiology, when US deaths stood at less than 100,000. Dr. Risch once again called for early outpatient treatment on July 23, 2020, in an Op-Ed published in Newsweek Magazine.

Finally, on November 19, 2020, Dr. Risch joined with two other highly respected physicians, Dr. Peter McCullough and Dr. George Fareed, and they testified historically before the US Senate strongly urging the use of early outpatient treatment with the triple therapy of an antiviral, an antibiotic, and Zinc.

At that point, deaths in our nation were only at about 250,000. Today, as of April 1, 2021, they stand at nearly 560,000. Nearly 300,000 lives could have been saved had early outpatient treatment been adopted by US public health agencies in November of 2020. Some 450,000 lives, almost half a million, could have been saved had they done so when Dr. Risch first advised in May of 2020.

"History will not look kindly on us," says Dr. Peter McCullough. When all is said and done, and future generations ask, "Really, you did not offer to treat them?" - Because the government said not to do so. And you were aware of the data on Ivermectin? And Vitamin D, Zinc, and Hydroxychloroquine?

You saw that 27 randomized controlled studies all showed a mortality reduction of large magnitude. You saw that there was at least a 68% reduction in death with Ivermectin use - and you failed to recommend or even inform patients?

Yes. This period will go down in history as one of the darkest episodes for physicians.

We cannot defend it - we cannot explain it - and we cannot escape it. On December 13, 2020, just five days after Dr. Pierre Kory's passionate testimony was delivered to the US Senate, I coined the term, the “Kory Count.”

The Kory Count was begun to memorialize permanently the needless deaths resulting from a failure in public health policy, those deaths that could have been prevented if only the testimony by expert physicians had been heeded.

Dr. Pierre Kory stated that any deaths then (as of December 8, 2020), knowing that early outpatient treatment is life-saving, are preventable. The Kory Count is the running tally of the number of COVID-19 deaths that could have been prevented using such early outpatient treatment. Dr. Peter McCullough asked the FDA to approve early outpatient treatment on November 19, 2020 - including the use of Ivermectin.

So today on April 1, 2021, I update the Kory Count. It is out of reverence to those lost, those people whose lives could have been saved had early outpatient treatment become the health care policy of the land on November 19, 2020.

Dennis Prager has said to doctors collectively, "Shame on you." For physicians everywhere to know the truth, to know the results of numerous meta-analyses now completed by Dr. Tess Lawrie, Dr. Andrew Hill, and Dr. Pierre Kory on Ivermectin - and to know that deaths are reduced dramatically when this is used early and even late in the disease - and to not offer it to all high-risk patients, is unethical and contrary to our Hippocratic oath.

The reasons the WHO and FDA have rejected Ivermectin have nothing to do with science and everything to do with corruption by Big Pharma. I now update the Kory Count as it closes in on 300,000 preventable deaths:

Beginning Kory Count as of 03/09/21: 274,996

03/10/21: 1447

03/11/21: 1522

03/12/21: 1757

03/13/21: 1846

03/14/21: 572

03/15/21: 751

03/16/21: 1245

03/17/21: 1177

03/18/21: 1558

03/19/21: 1513

03/20/21: 773

03/21/21: 444

03/22/21: 650

03/23/21: 892

03/24/21: 1591

03/25/21: 1270

03/26/21: 1260

03/27/21: 780

03/28/21: 487

03/29/21: 685

03/30/21: 948

03/31/21: 1138

Current Kory Count: 299,252
But how can that be? I thought COVID was a hoax??????
 

SmithJ

Veteran Member
I just find it interesting that for a year COVID deniers have been saying:

old people die :shr:

fat people die :shr:

Sick people die :shr:

And basically proclaiming any attempt to protect them was too much of an inconvenience to deal with.

Yet along come a vaccine and MAYBE .00003544 % of the people who CHOOSE to take it die (maybe from it) and all of a sudden its :hof:the world is ending and the human race is going extinct.

Anyway, carry on............ :hof:
 

subnet

Boot
I just find it interesting that for a year COVID deniers have been saying:

old people die :shr:

fat people die :shr:

Sick people die :shr:

And basically proclaiming any attempt to protect them was too much of an inconvenience to deal with.

Yet along come a vaccine and MAYBE .00003544 % of the people who CHOOSE to take it die (maybe from it) and all of a sudden its :hof:the world is ending and the human race is going extinct.

Anyway, carry on............ :hof:
I personally don't give 2 shits if someone takes the jab or not or how many are getting the wuflu, the .gov and big pharma is telling us all lies and covering it up.
I find it interesting that so many here bought into the BS and lined up to be a lab rat so willingly but good luck with that.
 

Meadowlark

Has No Life - Lives on TB

3,544 deaths and 12,619 serious injuries reported between Dec. 14, 2020 and April 23, 2021
One of the world’s most prominent medical doctors with expertise in treating COVID-19 has gone on the record with a scathing rebuke of the U.S. government’s approach to fighting the virus. He says the government’s strategy, carried out in cooperation with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the United Nations World Health Organization, has resulted in tens of thousands of unnecessary deaths and is now being followed up with thousands more deaths caused by a mass-injection program.

Dr. Peter McCullough, in a 32-minute interview with journalist Alex Newman, said if this were any other vaccine it would have been pulled from the market by now for safety reasons.
McCullough holds the honor of being the most cited medical doctor on COVID-19 treatments at the National Library of Medicine, with more than 600 citations. He has testified before Congress and won numerous awards during his distinguished medical career.

Between Dec. 14 and April 23, there were 3,544 deaths reported to the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System [VAERS], along with 12,619 serious injuries.
One might expect these numbers would trigger an exhaustive investigation from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. But the opposite has occurred. According to McCullough, the government has taken what amounts to a passing glance at the alarming numbers and dismissed them with a bare minimum of scrutiny.

“A typical new drug at about five deaths, unexplained deaths, we get a black-box warning, your listeners would see it on TV, saying it may cause death,” McCullough said. “And then at about 50 deaths it’s pulled off the market.”
The U.S. has a precedent for this. In 1976 during the Swine Flu pandemic the U.S. attempted to vaccinate 55 million Americans, but at that point the shot caused about 500 cases of paralysis and 25 deaths.
“The program was killed, at 25 deaths,” McCullough said.

Compare that type of response to the government’s reaction to much higher reported death numbers related to the Moderna and Pfizer shots and the contrast is alarming, McCullough said, especially when the shots have not even been granted full FDA approval and are only being allowed on the market under an Emergency Use Authorization.
“In the U.S. today [as of late March] we have approximately 77 million people vaccinated for COVID and we have 2,602 deaths reported, so it’s unprecedented how many deaths have accrued,” he said.

“Then on March 8 the CDC announced on their website with very little fanfare, that they had reviewed about 1,600 deaths with unnamed FDA doctors and they indicated not a single death was related to the vaccine,” he added. “I think that was concerning in the academic community.”
McCullough said he knows from first-hand experience that doing a thorough investigation into 1,600 potentially vaccine-related deaths would have taken months to complete.

“I have chaired and participated in dozens of data safety monitoring boards and sat on those committees and I can tell you that this type of work would have taken many months to review all the labs, the death certificates and all the circumstances of an event. It is impossible for unnamed regulatory doctors without any experience with COVID 19 to opine that none of the deaths were related to the vaccine.”
Previous studies, including one from Harvard University, estimate that only 1 to 10 percent of all vaccine-related deaths get reported to VAERS. So in all likelihood, there are more people dying than even gets reported, yet the FDA can’t come up with a single death related to the Moderna and Pfizer shots.

“Reporting a death requires a healthcare worker to enter it into the system,” he said. And if the death does not occur within the normal 15-minute monitoring period they often go unreported. Most deaths occur within 72 hours of the shot. “They pile up on day one, two and three,” he said.
As a matter of comparison: There are 20 to 30 deaths reported every year to VAERS related to the flu shot. That’s with 195 million receiving flu shots. Compare that to the COVID shot, which resulted in 2,602 reported deaths through 77 million vaccinations.

That’s a stunningly high ratio of deaths to vaccinations, the highest for any vaccine in U.S. history, and yet no major media outlet has launched an investigation. Independent journalists and researchers such as Alex Newman, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Leo Hohmann have been ruthlessly censored.
“So the U.S. government has made a decision, along with the stakeholders – the CDC, NIH, FDA, Big Pharma, World Health Organization, Gates Foundation – they have made a commitment to mass vaccination as the solution to the COVID pandemic and we are really going to be witness to what’s going to happen in history. We’re sitting on, right now, the biggest number of vaccine deaths, there’s been tens of thousands of hospitalizations, all attributable to the vaccine, and going strong.”

McCullough testified before the U.S. Senate on Nov 19, 2020.
“I estimated at that time we could have saved half of the lives lost,” he told Newman. “There are now current estimates that we are up to about 85 percent of all lives lost could have been saved with something called sequenced oral multi-drug therapy.”
But instead, the government and its “stakeholders” in Big Pharma chose to focus on vaccines. At the same time, news organizations were recruited to present only one side of the vaccine story.

Mainstream outlets have agreed to not allow any news critical of the shots to reach the American people. This corrupt collusion falls under the Trusted News Initiative, a global collaboration signed onto by Big Tech social-media giants and many of its corrupt corporate media “partners.”
The partners signed onto the Trusted News Initiative to date are: Associated Press, AFP; BBC, CBC/Radio-Canada, European Broadcasting Union (EBU), Facebook, Financial Times, First Draft, Google/YouTube, The Hindu, Microsoft, Reuters, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, Twitter, The Washington Post. The New York Times has also participated in the past.

Reporting facts related to the dark side of the experimental mRNA vaccines is considered “dangerous disinformation” by the globalist media elites behind the Trusted News Initiative.

Dr. McCullough describes ‘whitewash of historic proportions
“So I think this was effectively a scrubbing, like we’ve seen elsewhere. There is a Trusted News Initiative, which is very important for Americans to understand, this was announced Dec. 10, and this is a coalition of all the major media and government stakeholders in vaccination, where they are not going to allow any negative information about vaccines to get into the popular media because they’re concerned about vaccine hesitancy, that if Americans got any type of fair, balanced coverage on safety events then they simply would not come forward and get the vaccine.”

“The Trusted News Initiative is really troublesome,” he continued, “because we’re now at record numbers of deaths, they continue to occur every day.”
Confirming a LeoHohmann.com report from earlier this month, McCullough said the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, while it does have issues with blood clots, is actually the safest of the three vaccines now being offered to Americans.

“In my professional opinion, the safest vaccine on the market was the J&J vaccine. And that was pulled for very rare blood-clotting events. We had seven million people vaccinated but the estimates are for the other two vaccines available, the blood-clotting rates are probably 30 times that of J&J, and these others are going strong.”

McCullough suggested that there is an incestuous relationship between the U.S. government and certain elements within Big Pharma, which causes regulators to look the other way when confronted with safety issues.
“A lot of Americans don’t understand how tight these stakeholders are. Keep in mind the NIH [National Institutes of Health] is a co-owner of the Moderna patent, so they have a vested financial interest in keeping these vaccines going,” he said.

More than 15 months into the COVID nightmare, the evidence is beginning to suggest the U.S. government colluded from the outset with the Gates Foundation, CDC, FDA, the United Nations World Health Organization and Big Pharma to make the vaccines the central focus of the global COVID response effort. They started promoting the vaccines before they were even out of clinical trials, McCullough said, which is against U.S. regulatory law.

More reports of high death counts
LeoHohmann.com has been getting reports that confirm Dr. McCullough’s warning that harmful events caused by the vaccine are being covered up by the medical establishment, the government, the legacy media and social-media giants Google, Facebook and Twitter.
A physician with a practice in the Kansas City area told LeoHohmann.com that of a recent 500-person sampling of nursing-home patients who received the COVID injection, 22 died within 48 hours. That represents an astonishing 4.4 percent death rate. Most people in the Kansas City area nursing homes are receiving the Pfizer shot, he said.

“I can’t prove they all died of the vaccine, all I can prove is it happened within 48 hours,” the physician told LeoHohmann.com.
“The requirements are they only need to be monitored for 15 minutes. So we are never going to know the real numbers,” he said. “If it happens outside of that 15-minute window it’s going to be impossible to prove… If the FDA approves this then God help us.”

The Kansas City physician requested his name not be revealed for fear that he could lose his medical license.
A Canadian doctor, Dr. Charles Hoffe, recently broke his silence and went public in defiance of a gag order, blowing the whistle on how “Moderna shots killed, disabled patients.”

McCollough said the government has never placed a focus on treating sick patients, choosing instead to focus on the WHO recommended strategy of social distancing, lockdowns, masking and vaccines. If the strategy had focused instead on a regimen that includes a multi-drug treatment of early onset symptoms, tens of thousands of lives could have been saved, he said.

In a December 2020 paper, A Guide for Home-Based COVID-19 treatment: Step by step doctor’s plan that could save your life, McCullough prescribes a four-pronged strategy that includes contagion control, early home treatment, late-stage treatment and lastly vaccination.

“I talked about the four pillars, with the first pillar being contagion control [wearing masks and lockdowns]. We’ve spent a lot of time on that. But really the missing pillar, if we would have spent our time focusing on sick patients, that would have had the highest public-health value.
“But what happened in the U.S. was we developed a game plan …that we were going to promote the importance of social distancing as part of contagion control and just have the population wait for a vaccine. There have been no updates on treatment, not outpatient, not inpatient. We don’t hear anything about sick patients. All we heard was about masking, lockdowns and wait for a vaccine.”
That trusted news initiative deserves a thread of its own. That is huge news, showing deliberate propaganda and censorship on a global level.:siren:
 
I am a firm proponent of freewill. You choose for you. I will choose for me.
This my personal rationale. I have autoimmune diseases. I have know idea what the implications of the new vaccines have for autoimmune issues. I don't purposely antagonize my immune system.
I do know I can take steps, proven steps, to mitigate Covid. I cannot mitigate any negative effects of a vaccine once introduced - it's there; a permanent, unnatural addition to the function of my body.
 

Coulter

Veteran Member
Well, given how well the gov has hid real inflation rates by constantly tinkering with how they define the data -- I don't have any confidence that any of those numbers that are gov provided are actually accurate.
Not to mention how they counted Biden's votes.

With all the lies this government tells - I can't imagine how anybody could trust this vaccine to be - remotely - like they claim it to be.
 
Last edited:

raven

TB Fanatic
The government claims Antifa and BLM are peaceful protesters.
The government claims that Trump supporters are violent rioters seeking to overthrow the lawfully elected government.
The government claims voter fraud does not exist.
The government wants to reengineer the infrastructure to all electric.
The government is spending trillions to implement the green new deal.
The government wants to impose a great reset whose stated purpose is "You will own nothing and be happy".
The government is supporting defund the police.

So now the government says the vaccine works and you will have to have a vaccine passport to buy, sell, or work but you do not have to have a passport for AIDS.

Well . . . OK THEN
 

mistaken1

Has No Life - Lives on TB
The U.S. has a precedent for this. In 1976 during the Swine Flu pandemic the U.S. attempted to vaccinate 55 million Americans, but at that point the shot caused about 500 cases of paralysis and 25 deaths. “The program was killed, at 25 deaths,” McCullough said.

What is different this time that the push continues?
Why in the world would the left-wing Trusted News Initiative give a rat's behind if the hated Trumpers refuse the vaccine?
 

Hfcomms

EN66iq
Even if it IS 100 times more...then you are looking at a number that went from .00003544 % (perceived percentage of death) to .003544 %

Again....perspective.


You can't have perspective when you lack information. We are in the third inning of a nine inning game here. These 'vaccines' are approved under emergency use authorization so there is no approved Covid vaccine. Because they are under EUA rules no long term studies have been done with control groups as is the norm with vaccine candidates. Those of you being injected are the guinea pigs for this experiment and those of us who have decided not to are the control group.

I don't want to be part of an experimental gene therapy regimen with the vaccine manufacturers having zero liability if something goes wrong. We won't know what long term effects these injections have for several years yet. To put yourself at unknown future risk with little reward isn't smart. No claims have been made by any of the manufacturers that these injections actually prevent Covid infection but only that they reduce the severity of the symptoms.

For a disease process that currently has a fatality rate of less than 1% of the overall population I see a lot of risk but little reward from these vaccinations. Informed consent is everything and people are not being informed as to the potential risks and are being pressured to take the injections.

Risk vs reward. Unknown risk and little reward.
 

Cardinal

Chickministrator
_______________
I am a firm proponent of freewill. You choose for you. I will choose for me.
This my personal rationale. I have autoimmune diseases. I have know idea what the implications of the new vaccines have for autoimmune issues. I don't purposely antagonize my immune system.
I do know I can take steps, proven steps, to mitigate Covid. I cannot mitigate any negative effects of a vaccine once introduced - it's there; a permanent, unnatural addition to the function of my body.
From what I am reading, they can actually cause auto immune diseases.
the Jab instructs your cells to make a spike protein.
There are about 20 human tissues that do that too.
That is why pregnant women are losing their babies.
Placentas make spike proteins, and these jabs are causing the body to reject placentas.
 
Last edited:

Border Collie Dad

Flat Earther
I just find it interesting that for a year COVID deniers have been saying:

old people die :shr:

fat people die :shr:

Sick people die :shr:

And basically proclaiming any attempt to protect them was too much of an inconvenience to deal with.

Yet along come a vaccine and MAYBE .00003544 % of the people who CHOOSE to take it die (maybe from it) and all of a sudden its :hof:the world is ending and the human race is going extinct.

Anyway, carry on............ :hof:

Using inadequate numbers again?

It is accepted knowledge that VAERS is only reported to on 1-10% of cases.
All of a sudden those 3000 deaths are 30,000 up to 300,000.
Multiply the injuries by the same factor.

The "official" methodology only counts vaccine deaths if someone dies with a needle in their arm.

Peddle your obfuscation somewhere else.
 

SmithJ

Veteran Member
Using inadequate numbers again?

It is accepted knowledge that VAERS is only reported to on 1-10% of cases.
All of a sudden those 3000 deaths are 30,000 up to 300,000.
Multiply the injuries by the same factor.

The "official" methodology only counts vaccine deaths if someone dies with a needle in their arm.

Peddle your obfuscation somewhere else.
Oh look, an opinion from a flat-earther!
 

et2

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Can ya’all see this graph? Every time I post it nobody’s says a word. The graph represents the Height of Covid cases weren’t last March or so ... but after the vaccine trials and release to the public.

I know people who’s family died from the vaccine. And in the last 4 weeks I’ve talked to many I personally know who have gotten so sick from the jab, they tried to go to the hospital more than once. When the hospital found out they were vaccinated they were sent home without any treatment. One got so sick after the vaccination they decided to retire. Life became more important to them.

They’re lying to your face about the vaccine and what it’s doing to people.


Here’s the graph. April 28 is the starting point going backwards


6937D5D7-AB63-4C46-A38B-CDFEB325518B.png
 

Border Collie Dad

Flat Earther
thanks for the explanation, et2.
I wasn't sure of the timeline scale

Would I be wrong in guessing that those are official numbers and not the true numbers?
 

rob0126

Veteran Member
The government claims Antifa and BLM are peaceful protesters.
The government claims that Trump supporters are violent rioters seeking to overthrow the lawfully elected government.
The government claims voter fraud does not exist.
The government wants to reengineer the infrastructure to all electric.
The government is spending trillions to implement the green new deal.
The government wants to impose a great reset whose stated purpose is "You will own nothing and be happy".
The government is supporting defund the police.

So now the government says the vaccine works and you will have to have a vaccine passport to buy, sell, or work but you do not have to have a passport for AIDS.

Well . . . OK THEN

1984 in living color.

Pretty much whatever they say, it's the opposite to some varying degree.
 

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap
But how can that be? I thought COVID was a hoax??????

I firmly believe that it is something, but it is either Influenza A, Influenza B, and/or 5G poisoning of the cells (lowers O2 in the body, for one thing), pre-existing conditions/co-morbidity, a combination...as many people have one or more ailments...and if forced on a ventilator (big $$$ for the hospital, $39,000 payment for that alone), that actually does some people in!

Ivermectin must help the body in a way to help get more O2, and maybe more factors.

I believe that there really is a lab tech/Dr. who is suing the CDC <good!> because 1,500 positive PCR tests for "COVID" actually were Influenza A or B. I found a site where a Dr. by the same name posted a bunch of related articles...he sounds real...and I am praying for him and other whistleblowers that expose the truth!
 

raven

TB Fanatic
1984 in living color.

Pretty much whatever they say, it's the opposite to some varying degree.
It is undeniable that the liberals, Democrats, and Deep State
used Corona and the fear of pandemic
as a political weapon
to erase Trump.

you know this

so . . . now . . . you want to believe . . yea verily brother, can I get an amen or an awoman . . .
you want to believe that everything is honest and above board
and they care deeply . . . deeply . . . about YOUR welfare.

yeah! amen! preach it brother!!
 

et2

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Want to see something odd. Remember this started in China. So bad they locked people in their homes. Rumors they were incinerating people 24/7. People dropping dead in the street.

Then it came here. Remember how bad they said it was last February and the next few months here? that first graph shows something different.

They tell us to believe the science. Then the science shows ... something different. Here is China compared to the rest of the world. All the colors above China is the rest of the world.

2FFCD06B-37C5-4301-BB80-3F40E76CF6D7.jpg
 

ChicagoMan74

ULTRA MAGA
Using inadequate numbers again?

It is accepted knowledge that VAERS is only reported to on 1-10% of cases.
All of a sudden those 3000 deaths are 30,000 up to 300,000.
Multiply the injuries by the same factor.

The "official" methodology only counts vaccine deaths if someone dies with a needle in their arm.

Peddle your obfuscation somewhere else.
?????

Because NO ONE outside of online or printed media would ever notice an extra 300,000 deaths or injuries...so gosh golly...where are they?

I don't think I would need leohohmann.com to help me notice either.
 
Top