COMMUNISM Data Firm Head: China Has Asked WHO to Let it Run Global Vaccine Passport System

Data Firm Head: China Has Asked WHO to Let it Run Global Vaccine Passport System

Social credit score via the backdoor.

Published 6 hours ago on 1 April, 2021
Paul Joseph Watson
China News Service via Getty Images
5 Comments

The chairman of data firm PANDA claims that China has asked the World Health Organization to appoint Beijing to oversee a global vaccine passport system, an ominous prospect given how China’s social credit score system operates.

During an interview at the inaugural BizNews Investment Conference, Nick Hudson explained why this was such a chilling development, saying he was worried about the fabric of society and the future of his children.

“China is petitioning the World Health Organization to appoint it to run a global immune passport program – now if that doesn’t scare the living daylights out of you I do not know what will,” said Hudson.

“This kind of centralization, this kind of control, social credit systems…we need to push back against this stuff because it’s coming,” he added.

Hudson noted how the UK government denied for months that they were preparing to roll out vaccine passports yet at the same time were bankrolling companies to create them.


“They’re lying to the public about this,” said Hudson, tying the development of the vaccine passport to a new bill in the UK that would ban protests that cause “annoyance,” which is basically any protest.

“This stuff is disturbing…I do not want to see my children growing up in a world like that,” said Hudson.

The prospect of China being in control of a global vaccine passport system is obviously ominous given that the Communist state already has its own social credit score system that prevents dissidents from traveling.

As we highlighted last year, Beijing has already combined its COVID-19 tracking system with its social credit score program.

In August 2019, the Communist state bragged about how it had prevented 2.5 million “discredited entities” from purchasing plane tickets and 90,000 people from buying high speed train tickets in the month of July alone.

The social credit score is used to make life difficult for people who commit infractions, including some as minor as jaywalking, and at its worse makes life almost unlivable.

Combining the vaccine passport system with a global social credit score system therefore makes sense because those who are denied the passport would be forced to live in a de facto state of permanent lockdown.

The fact that the vaccine passport system is also likely to be linked to a facial recognition network represents another commonality with the Chinese social credit score system.

Author Naomi Wolf also warns that the vaccine passport is merely a veil for the social credit score system in the video below.


“I can’t say this any more clearly – the vaccine passport platform is the same platform as a social credit score system,” says Wolf.

Hummmm......

I'm living in a world I don't understand.

Since WHO and the Chinese are both a part of the deep state...this comes as no surprise. Lets hope and pray that they are not successful in implimenting anything like this in America.

Wonderful, simply lovely.

Well, if 100 is a perfect “social credit score”, I guess all of us here are going to be able to brag about how LOW our score is before we get whisked off to the re-education camps... what do you think the cut off will be? 50 or will they require a passing score of 70%?

If I can hit ten in the ”10 ring” does that give me a score of 100?

I knew this was coming.

Nopie said:

I guess all of us here are going to be able to brag about how LOW our score is before we get whisked off to the re-education camps...

Click to expand...

Whisk THIS!

Pay attention to when this piece was published. Now recall that one shot is called Pfizer Bio n’ Tech vaccine:


Weaponizing Biotech: How China's Military Is Preparing for a 'New Domain of Warfare'
Under Beijing's civil-military fusion strategy, the PLA is sponsoring research on gene editing, human performance enhancement, and more.
ELSA B. KANIA and WILSON VORNDICK
|
AUGUST 14, 2019
We may be on the verge of a brave new world indeed. Today’s advances in biotechnology and genetic engineering have exciting applications in medicine — yet also alarming implications, including for military affairs. China’s national strategy of military-civil fusion (军民融合) has highlighted biology as a priority, and the People’s Liberation Army could be at the forefront of expanding and exploiting this knowledge.

The PLA’s keen interest is reflected in strategic writings and research that argue that advances in biology are contributing to changing the form or character (形态) of conflict. For example:

• In 2010’s War for Biological Dominance (制生权战争), Guo Jiwei (郭继卫), a professor with the Third Military Medical University, emphasizes the impact of biology on future warfare.
• In 2015, then-president of the Academy of Military Medical Sciences He Fuchu (贺福初) argued that biotechnology will become the new “strategic commanding heights” of national defense, from biomaterials to "brain control" weapons. Maj. Gen. He has since become the vice president of the Academy of Military Sciences, which leads China’s military science enterprise.
• Biology is among seven "new domains of warfare" discussed in a 2017 book by Zhang Shibo (张仕波), a retired general and former president of the National Defense University, who concludes: “Modern biotechnology development is gradually showing strong signs characteristic of an offensive capability,” including the possibility that “specific ethnic genetic attacks” (特定种族基因攻击) could be employed.
• The 2017 edition of Science of Military Strategy (战略学), a textbook published by the PLA’s National Defense University that is considered to be relatively authoritative, debuted a section about biology as a domain of military struggle, similarly mentioning the potential for new kinds of biological warfare to include “specific ethnic genetic attacks.”
  
  
  These are just a few examples of an extensive and evolving literature by Chinese military scholars and scientists who are exploring new directions in military innovation.
  Following these lines of thinking, the PLA is pursuing military applications for biology and looking into promising intersections with other disciplines, including brain science, supercomputing, and artificial intelligence. Since 2016, the Central Military Commission has funded projects on military brain science, advanced biomimetic systems, biological and biomimetic materials, human performance enhancement, and “new concept” biotechnology.
  
  
  
• Gene Editing
  
  Meanwhile, China has been leading the world in the number of trials of the CRISPR gene-editing technology in humans. Over a dozen clinical trials are known to have been undertaken, and some of these activities have provoked global controversy. It’s not clear whether Chinese scientist He Jiankui, may have received approval or even funding from the government for editing embryos that becamethe world’s first genetically modified humans. The news provoked serious concerns and backlash around the world and in China, where new legislation has been introduced to increase oversight over such research. However, there are reasons to be skeptical that China will overcome its history and track record of activities that are at best ethically questionable, or at worst cruel and unusual, in healthcare and medical sciences.
  
  But it is striking how many of China’s CRISPR trials are taking place at the PLA General Hospital, including to fight cancer. Indeed, the PLA’s medical institutions have emerged as major centers for research in gene editing and other new frontiers of military medicine and biotechnology. The PLA’s Academy of Military Medical Sciences, or AMMS, which China touts as its “cradle of training for military medical talent,” was recently placed directly under the purview of the Academy of Military Science, which itself has been transformed to concentrate on scientific and technological innovation. This change could indicate a closer integration of medical science with military research.
  
  In 2016, an AMMS doctoral researcher published a dissertation, “Research on the Evaluation of Human Performance Enhancement Technology,” which characterized CRISPR-Cas as one of three primary technologies that might boost troops’ combat effectiveness. The supporting research looked at the effectiveness of the drug Modafinil, which has applications in cognitive enhancement; and at transcranial magnetic stimulation, a type of brain stimulation, while also contending that the “great potential” of CRISPR-Cas as a “military deterrence technology in which China should “grasp the initiative” in development.
  
  
  The intersection of biotechnology and artificial intelligence promises unique synergies. The vastness of the human genome — among the biggest of big data — all but requires AI and machine learning to point the way for CRISPR-related advances in therapeutics or enhancement.
  
  In 2016, the potential strategic value of genetic information led the Chinese government to launch the National Genebank (国家基因库), which intends to become the world’s largest repository of such data. It aims to “develop and utilize China’s valuable genetic resources, safeguard national security in bioinformatics (生物信息学), and enhance China’s capability to seize the strategic commanding heights” in the domain of biotechnology.
  
  The effort is administered by BGI, formerly known as Beijing Genomics Inc., which is Beijing’s de facto national champion in the field. BGI has established an edge in cheap gene sequencing, concentrating on amassing massive amounts of data from a diverse array of sources. The company has a global presence, including laboratories in California and Australia.
  
  U.S. policymakers have been concerned, if not troubled, by the company’s access to the genetic information of Americans. BGI has been pursuing a range of partnerships, including with the University of California and with the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia on human genome sequencing. BGI’s research and partnerships in Xinjiang also raise questions about its linkage to human rights abuses, including the forced collection of genetic information from Uighurs in Xinjiang.
  
  There also appear to be links between BGI’s research and military research activities, particularly with the PLA’s National University of Defense Technology. BGI’s bioinformatics research has used Tianhe supercomputers to process genetic information for biomedical applications, while BGI and NUDT researchers have collaborated on several publications, including the design of tools for the use of CRISPR.
  
  Biotech’s Expansive Frontier
  
  It will be increasingly important to keep tabs on the Chinese military’s interest in biology as an emerging domain of warfare, guided by strategists who talk about potential “genetic weapons” and the possibility of a “bloodless victory.” Although the use of CRISPR to edit genes remains novel and nascent, these tools and techniques are rapidly advancing, and what is within the realm of the possible for military applications may continue to shift as well. In the process, the lack of transparency and uncertainty of ethical considerations in China’s research initiatives raise the risks of technological surprise.
• Weaponizing Biotech: How China's Military Is Preparing for a 'New Domain of Warfare'
  

We live in interesting times.

What could go wrong?

Chuck Fina.

NWIH,J!!!!!!!!!!!

No Way In Hell, Jose!!!!!!!!

marymonde said:

Pay attention to when this piece was published. Now recall that one shot is called Pfizer Bio n’ Tech vaccine:


Weaponizing Biotech: How China's Military Is Preparing for a 'New Domain of Warfare'
Under Beijing's civil-military fusion strategy, the PLA is sponsoring research on gene editing, human performance enhancement, and more.
ELSA B. KANIA and WILSON VORNDICK
|
AUGUST 14, 2019
We may be on the verge of a brave new world indeed. Today’s advances in biotechnology and genetic engineering have exciting applications in medicine — yet also alarming implications, including for military affairs. China’s national strategy of military-civil fusion (军民融合) has highlighted biology as a priority, and the People’s Liberation Army could be at the forefront of expanding and exploiting this knowledge.

The PLA’s keen interest is reflected in strategic writings and research that argue that advances in biology are contributing to changing the form or character (形态) of conflict. For example:

• In 2010’s War for Biological Dominance (制生权战争), Guo Jiwei (郭继卫), a professor with the Third Military Medical University, emphasizes the impact of biology on future warfare.
• In 2015, then-president of the Academy of Military Medical Sciences He Fuchu (贺福初) argued that biotechnology will become the new “strategic commanding heights” of national defense, from biomaterials to "brain control" weapons. Maj. Gen. He has since become the vice president of the Academy of Military Sciences, which leads China’s military science enterprise.
• Biology is among seven "new domains of warfare" discussed in a 2017 book by Zhang Shibo (张仕波), a retired general and former president of the National Defense University, who concludes: “Modern biotechnology development is gradually showing strong signs characteristic of an offensive capability,” including the possibility that “specific ethnic genetic attacks” (特定种族基因攻击) could be employed.
• The 2017 edition of Science of Military Strategy (战略学), a textbook published by the PLA’s National Defense University that is considered to be relatively authoritative, debuted a section about biology as a domain of military struggle, similarly mentioning the potential for new kinds of biological warfare to include “specific ethnic genetic attacks.”
  
  
  These are just a few examples of an extensive and evolving literature by Chinese military scholars and scientists who are exploring new directions in military innovation.
  Following these lines of thinking, the PLA is pursuing military applications for biology and looking into promising intersections with other disciplines, including brain science, supercomputing, and artificial intelligence. Since 2016, the Central Military Commission has funded projects on military brain science, advanced biomimetic systems, biological and biomimetic materials, human performance enhancement, and “new concept” biotechnology.
  
  
  
• Gene Editing
  
  Meanwhile, China has been leading the world in the number of trials of the CRISPR gene-editing technology in humans. Over a dozen clinical trials are known to have been undertaken, and some of these activities have provoked global controversy. It’s not clear whether Chinese scientist He Jiankui, may have received approval or even funding from the government for editing embryos that becamethe world’s first genetically modified humans. The news provoked serious concerns and backlash around the world and in China, where new legislation has been introduced to increase oversight over such research. However, there are reasons to be skeptical that China will overcome its history and track record of activities that are at best ethically questionable, or at worst cruel and unusual, in healthcare and medical sciences.
  
  But it is striking how many of China’s CRISPR trials are taking place at the PLA General Hospital, including to fight cancer. Indeed, the PLA’s medical institutions have emerged as major centers for research in gene editing and other new frontiers of military medicine and biotechnology. The PLA’s Academy of Military Medical Sciences, or AMMS, which China touts as its “cradle of training for military medical talent,” was recently placed directly under the purview of the Academy of Military Science, which itself has been transformed to concentrate on scientific and technological innovation. This change could indicate a closer integration of medical science with military research.
  
  In 2016, an AMMS doctoral researcher published a dissertation, “Research on the Evaluation of Human Performance Enhancement Technology,” which characterized CRISPR-Cas as one of three primary technologies that might boost troops’ combat effectiveness. The supporting research looked at the effectiveness of the drug Modafinil, which has applications in cognitive enhancement; and at transcranial magnetic stimulation, a type of brain stimulation, while also contending that the “great potential” of CRISPR-Cas as a “military deterrence technology in which China should “grasp the initiative” in development.
  
  
  The intersection of biotechnology and artificial intelligence promises unique synergies. The vastness of the human genome — among the biggest of big data — all but requires AI and machine learning to point the way for CRISPR-related advances in therapeutics or enhancement.
  
  In 2016, the potential strategic value of genetic information led the Chinese government to launch the National Genebank (国家基因库), which intends to become the world’s largest repository of such data. It aims to “develop and utilize China’s valuable genetic resources, safeguard national security in bioinformatics (生物信息学), and enhance China’s capability to seize the strategic commanding heights” in the domain of biotechnology.
  
  The effort is administered by BGI, formerly known as Beijing Genomics Inc., which is Beijing’s de facto national champion in the field. BGI has established an edge in cheap gene sequencing, concentrating on amassing massive amounts of data from a diverse array of sources. The company has a global presence, including laboratories in California and Australia.
  
  U.S. policymakers have been concerned, if not troubled, by the company’s access to the genetic information of Americans. BGI has been pursuing a range of partnerships, including with the University of California and with the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia on human genome sequencing. BGI’s research and partnerships in Xinjiang also raise questions about its linkage to human rights abuses, including the forced collection of genetic information from Uighurs in Xinjiang.
  
  There also appear to be links between BGI’s research and military research activities, particularly with the PLA’s National University of Defense Technology. BGI’s bioinformatics research has used Tianhe supercomputers to process genetic information for biomedical applications, while BGI and NUDT researchers have collaborated on several publications, including the design of tools for the use of CRISPR.
  
  Biotech’s Expansive Frontier
  
  It will be increasingly important to keep tabs on the Chinese military’s interest in biology as an emerging domain of warfare, guided by strategists who talk about potential “genetic weapons” and the possibility of a “bloodless victory.” Although the use of CRISPR to edit genes remains novel and nascent, these tools and techniques are rapidly advancing, and what is within the realm of the possible for military applications may continue to shift as well. In the process, the lack of transparency and uncertainty of ethical considerations in China’s research initiatives raise the risks of technological surprise.
• Weaponizing Biotech: How China's Military Is Preparing for a 'New Domain of Warfare'
  

Click to expand...

I don't suppose the gene therapy"vaccine" has anything to do with their gene editing? Surely not (sarc)

Groucho said:

I'm living in a world I don't understand.

Click to expand...

completely planned that way ... however in the future ... you will

What else is in the vaccine?

China has ethnic bioweapons to use against Americans. That way they get a 'bloodless victory'!

And didn't they report the mRNA genome/sequence vaccine companies used in their vaccines for that 'spike' protein...that codes for God knows what? This makes me even more leary of this vaccine being a two stage bioweapon - a binary weapon - part one is the vaccine with the mRNA producing the spike protein and resulting antibodies then introduce part two a coronavirus that reacts with part one resulting in death by antibody immune enhancement. China was found hacking into every ?major vaccine companies research/manufacturing. Binary bioweapons are well known.

They have said Taiwan is just a distraction, America is their target...they need the land and infrastructure for their people as they have polluted the crap out of their country and can't keep up to feed 1.4 billion people!

This was the plan all along with the O3term/DNC/DS.

The 5-10tril being passed now is for the Great Reset's infrastructure. They're putting up the electric fences and corrals along with the heads gates to inspect each person financially, politically and physically through digital means.

They're giving China the keys to help assimilate the population. To cull and redistribute the middle class's wealth back to .gov for Equity and in the end assist them in dealing with deplorables that won't go along quietly with their fundamental transformational plans for Amerika into their Marxist Utopia.

The foreign migrants being funneled into Red States will become the obedient working citizens deplorable can't be when the system cancels and liquidates them.

They will control and own everything while you're completely digitally monitored and controlled 24/7 with smart tech. The social score system grooms people to become better comrades for the DNC/DS. To achieve a high enough metric score to merit food, water, shelter and medical reparations to exist in their system.

Read-up on a Crypto called "VeChain". China (the whole nation) will be running on it in the near future, and I can see it being used for Global "Vaccine Passports" without any significant effort for the rollout.

marymonde said:

Weaponizing Biotech: How China's Military Is Preparing for a 'New Domain of Warfare'

Click to expand...

This is how stupid the DNC/DS - Baizuo/Useful Idiots are.

They think they can trust/use China and Russia to go along with the DNC/DS Marxist Communist Coup to secure permanent power for themselves?

They'll some how honor their globalist 5th column deeds destroying America from within and allow them to become permanent leaders of a PAX-America?

This was their plan over 60 years ago.

Listen to their tone with the Obiden/DNC/DS.

China and Russia have forged plans to regain former territories within their regions first.

In the end they will occupy the former CONUS and Alaska and do with it as they please.

social media scores, vaccine passports, all of which have been discussed in the Unexplained forum here at TBK since at least late 2015. It was woo then, that has now become reality.

Dennis Olson said:

Data Firm Head: China Has Asked WHO to Let it Run Global Vaccine Passport System

Social credit score via the backdoor.

Click to expand...

Never let a crisis of your making go to waste...
She said the quiet part of the plan out loud.
RT 1:29secs
View: https://twitter.com/stillgray/status/1377977882635472898


View: https://twitter.com/BoiWonder1994/status/1377992243756347394


View: https://twitter.com/VicVanceIII/status/1377984125911494659

Well that's just a shocker, right there.

Lena Wen, President of Planned Parenthood
RT 1:29secs
View: https://twitter.com/stillgray/status/1377977882635472898

How to deal with anti-vac/passport people:

We are not going to reach herd immunity because of Vaccine/Passport hesitancy.

We need to make it clear to them that the Vaccine/Passports are the ticket back to pre-pandemic life.

The window to do that is really narrowing.

All these States are opening up too fast at 100%, and the window to do that is narrowing...to tie States reopening policy to Vaccination/Passport Status.

What is the carrot going to be...how are we going to incentivize people to get the Vaccine/Passports?

That is why CDC and Obiden Administration needs to come out a lot bolder and say if your vaccinated you can do all these things and have freedoms other wise all these people will go out and seize these freedoms before they get the Vaccine/Passports.

JUST IN: Is OBiden threatening to cancel July 4 because States are opening up too fast?
RT 1min
View: https://twitter.com/DailyCaller/status/1378008700196167684

Well China effectively took over the USA last year so I don't see much standing their way any longer...

Groucho said:

I'm living in a world I don't understand.

Click to expand...

I have decided, after much thought, only just here lately, to give this whole mess the bilateral middle finger salutation. I am well pleased to report, I haven't missed a wink of sleep since.

Groucho said:

I'm living in a world I don't understand.

Click to expand...

This will help: it's largely run by midwit psychotic socialist traitorous (to the U.S., the West, and humanity) kleptomaniacs with at best modest understanding of history or economics, who hate whites, Christianity, and freedom.