HEALTH MEDICAL SHOCKER: Scientists at Sloan Kettering discover mRNA inactivates tumor-suppressing proteins, meaning it can promote cancer

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap
By Admin
March 3, 2021


1615166562957.png

by: S.D. Wells

There’s a secret layer of information in your cells called messenger RNA, that’s located between DNA and proteins, that serves as a critical link. Now, in a medical shocker to the whole world of vaccine philosophy, scientists at Sloan Kettering found that mRNA itself carries cancer CAUSING changes – changes that genetic tests don’t even analyze, flying completely under the radar of oncologists across the globe.

So now, it’s time for independent laboratories that are not vaccine manufacturers (or hired by them) to run diagnostic testing on the Covid vaccine series and find out if these are cancer-driving inoculations that, once the series is complete, will cause cancer tumors in the vaccinated masses who have all rushed out to get the jab out of fear and propaganda influence. Welcome to the world of experimental and dirty vaccines known as mRNA “technology.”

Previously unknown cancer driving messengers are hiding in RNA, not DNA
This mind-blowing discovery should be published on every medical news site, newspaper, television news broadcast and on the CDC website, but unless you are reading this article and use DuckDuckGo as your search engine, you probably wouldn’t ever see it. That’s because Google is in on the fix, with Big Pharma and the VIC – the vaccine industrial complex. So here’s a more in-depth explanation of what we’re looking at, for real, regarding mRNA and vaccines.

The information carrying molecule, messenger RNA, can instruct human cells ultimately in the same way as cancer drivers, playing a major role in causing cancer to thrive while inactivating natural tumor-suppressing proteins the human body creates to save you from cancer. This is the complete opposite of what the CDC and the vaccine manufactures are telling everyone right now about the Covid vaccines, and this is based on clinical research by molecular biologists at the Sloan Kettering Institute.

Even sequencing the DNA in cancer cells doesn’t reveal these changes, that’s how sneaky the vaccines are. It’s like a Trojan horse that tells your cells to allow these changes to be made, as if they were safe, but they’re not. All assumptions being made about mRNA being ‘safe’ right now have been completely turned 180 degrees with this research. Consider this very carefully if you have not yet been vaccinated with mRNA technology, and you may want to ‘lawyer-up’ if you already got the jabs.

After your Covid vaccination, RNA is transported out of your cell’s nucleus, and will no longer function properly as a cancer tumor suppressor
Bill Gates and the Vaccine Industrial Complex are very sinister, as we all know, but to create vaccines that truncate (disable by cutting short) cancer tumor suppressors, and destroy the human body’s ability to protect against cancer, well, that’s just complete insanity. Truncated tumor-suppressor proteins are similar to the DNA mutations that cause cancer cells to mutate and multiply uncontrollably. Will America see cancer cases skyrocket over the next few years due to Covid vaccines? Only time will tell, but right now, science is revealing that it’s likely. Pay close attention.

Therefore, anyone who is scared to death of the Covid vaccines is pro-science rather than anti-science, because the science shows the mRNA technology is very dangerous, especially concerning proteins that fuel cancer tumors. Let’s say that again: Science shows mRNA technology can fuel cancer tumor growth.

Substantial amount of people with blood cancer have the SAME inactivation of tumor-suppressor genes at the mRNA level
Scientists also discovered that a substantial amount of people with blood cancer, a.k.a. chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), have the same exact inactivation of tumor-suppressor genes at the mRNA level. In fact, the mRNA changes they detected could possibly account for the missing DNA mutations, and that spells out bad news for everyone who thinks the Covid vaccine series is “safe and effective.” It’s effective alright, at suppressing anti-cancer proteins, one might conclude.

Even if just half (partial truncation) mRNA changes in human cells take place, it’s enough to “completely override the function of the normal versions that are present,” according to the Sloan Kettering team of scientists. These changes can also apply to 100 different genes at the same time, so the changes can add up quickly and cause horrific health repercussions. Of course, mainstream media will dismiss any connections made by these discoveries, but they’re paid to regurgitate pharma talk, so that’s not surprising at all.

It is important to note that mRNA changes, according to researchers, are not limited to blood cancer, but have been linked to acute lymphatic cancer and breast cancer. Could this mean we’re looking at a new population control mechanism hidden in messenger RNA?

About 20,000 people in the US develop “CLL” chronic lympthocytic leukemia each year. How many will quietly begin developing it now, and then have it suddenly “show up” five years from now? Symptoms include fatigue, enlarged lymph nodes, and night sweats. Did you get mRNA vaccinated and experience those symptoms already? Are those symptoms on the warning label – the vaccine insert? Did you read them?

There’s only one “treatment” offered right now for CLL by the Pharma Industrial Complex, and that’s stem cell bone marrow transplantation. Oh, but it’s only recommended if your CLL is “likely” to advance. Do your mRNA vaccines now qualify you as “likely” to advance with CLL?

Tune your internet dial to Vaccines.news for updates on human challenge trials for people interested in suppressing genes that fight cancer. No wonder Mark Zuckerberg is scared to death about the Covid vaccine.

Original Article on NaturalNews

Sources for this article include: (two different articles at those identical links)

mskcc.org

vaccines.news

mskcc.org

 
Last edited:

AddisonRose

On loan from Heaven
No one has ever been able to isolate the viral component of COVID-19. My 94-year-old mother had to take one, her arm hurt for days, and she vomited all the next day. She tested positive twice for Covid with no symptoms. I don’t understand why she had to take the shot. But then again I’m not the medical POA. Nor is my input wanted.


Once vaccinated when you’re exposed again to COVID-19 the results are more severe from what I understand.

If anybody’s on Fraudbook follow Doris LOH. She has done studies for the past year on COVID-19, with melatonin and vitamin C.
 

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap
I have asked a handful of times, here and there, how come Natural News is not credible and to provide examples, and no one does. So what is wrong with Natural News? What did they report incorrectly?

So here we go, all of the other sources, including Sloan Kettering are ignored, because of one supposed "bad source."

I have never read anything wonky or wrong at Natural News. They are revealers of truth.
 

bw

Fringe Ranger
Ok, short on brain cycles here. What does this actually mean? The jab is suddenly worse? Suddenly better? Who benefits if one or the other of those is true?
 

Ractivist

Pride comes before the fall.....Pride month ended.
Don’t worry, they will sell the cure for cancer.......if enough folks get sick to make it really profitable.
 

subnet

Boot
I have asked a handful of times, here and there, how come Natural News is not credible and to provide examples, and no one does. So what is wrong with Natural News? What did they report incorrectly?

So here we go, all of the other sources, including Sloan Kettering are ignored, because of one supposed "bad source."

I have never read anything wonky or wrong at Natural News. They are revealers of truth.
Did you read the sources?
One quote
"It’s important to note that mRNAs are a normal component of all cells and the specific ones discussed here are not involved in mRNA-based vaccines, like the one developed against SARS-CoV-2. "
Kinda takes the wind out of the headline........
 

et2

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Wife already has CLL ... with gene mutation & deletion. She ain’t taking their vaccine. They’ll most likely kill her.
 
Last edited:

Kris Gandillon

The Other Curmudgeon
_______________
I have asked a handful of times, here and there, how come Natural News is not credible and to provide examples, and no one does. So what is wrong with Natural News? What did they report incorrectly?

So here we go, all of the other sources, including Sloan Kettering are ignored, because of one supposed "bad source."

I have never read anything wonky or wrong at Natural News. They are revealers of truth.

Mike Adams owns and writes for Natural News and well over 100 other “related” web sites that all reference the same stories so it LOOKS LIKE multiple sites have picked up the story and run with it.

I contracted to a similar company back in 2014-2015 to build data centers for them. Their main business was this kind of thing on steroids....all for the eyeballs generating ad revenue. They had over 800 domains with at least 250 of them active while I was there.

Dead giveaway that you may be dealing with such a web site that cares more about attracting eyeballs for ad revenue than truthful articles is when you see a lot of the same, often "out there", advertisements for questionable products and services as you scroll down thru the website. They get paid for you just SEEING the ad (called an "impression") whether you click on it or not (they get paid more if you do click on it...that's called a click-thru). If you actually buy any of their products, woohoo even more money!

A prime way they grab you is to take a current event and embellish it a bit to make it more intriguing...they make up crap out of whole cloth in an effort to suck you in and then hope you share it on social media (or places like TB2K) with the link back to their story so they increase the eyeball count seeing their ads.

Oh, the things I could share about this "industry".

This is what he did in this specific case. The Sloan Kettering article is from 2018, well before Covid or the vaccines. While it mentions mRNA it was Mike Adams who took the liberty to make the connection with the vaccines and created his own version of the truth i.e. created the intrigue that would generate "discussion" and draw eyeballs to his web sites generating ad revenue. Sloan Kettering has not published anything making this connection.

The 250 click-bait web sites I mentioned were related to the company I was building data centers for in 2014-2015. They were doing the same thing that Mike Adams does to generate ad revenue across their many cross-linked web sites...intentionally embellishing real stories and events to gain interested viewer traffic to pump ad revenue. The company was making millions of dollars a month in profits and it was their ONLY income stream. Other than the cost of the data centers and the people to embellish the articles, their primary expense was buying Google ad words to drive traffic to these sites on a targeted basis. They made 2-3 Google ad words buys each day spending 10s of thousands of dollars each time.

As long as the ad revenue generated exceeded the Google ad word expense they made a nice gross profit which they gave to the employees in the form of 30% to 60% bonuses. Many of the employees salaries were already north of $100K BEFORE the bonuses.

This is a whole subculture on the web. MANY companies do this to accomplish nothing more than generating ad revenue. They couldn't care less about the truthfulness of what they write as long as it trended and drew in those eyeballs.

Discernment is key.

NaturalNews.com and vaccines.news, the referenced links in the article in the OP, are both owned by Mike Adams.

Take a look at:

Rand Paul News | Rand Paul News & Updates
Gorsuch News | Gorsuch News – Gorsuch Information
Vote Fraud News | Vote Fraud News – Vote Fraud Information

Notice the identical format? These are also Mike Adams web sites.

Another common format:

Trump News | Trump News
White House News | White House News

Also Mike Adams sites. Notice they are all linked in the top banner of each site.

Here is a link that details Mike Adams-owned domains which is as of 2015, six years ago but has been updated a bit along the way. He has many more domains today. Some of the ones below are now dormant 6 years later. He posts the same article on multiple of these web sites and then cross-references them to make it look like different web sites have picked up the story.

 
Last edited:

Sicario

The Executor
Mike Adams owns and writes for Natural News and well over 100 other “related” web sites that all reference the same stories so it LOOKS LIKE multiple sites have picked up the story and run with it.

I contracted to a similar company back in 2014-2015 to build data centers for them. Their main business was this kind of thing on steroids....all for the eyeballs generating ad revenue. They had over 800 domains with at least 250 of them active while I was there.

Dead giveaway that you may be dealing with such a web site that cares more about attracting eyeballs for ad revenue than truthful articles is when you see a lot of the same, often "out there", advertisements for questionable products and services as you scroll down thru the website. They get paid for you just SEEING the ad (called an "impression") whether you click on it or not (they get paid more if you do click on it...that's called a click-thru). If you actually buy any of their products, woohoo even more money!

A prime way they grab you is to take a current event and embellish it a bit to make it more intriguing...they make up crap out of whole cloth in an effort to suck you in and then hope you share it on social media (or places like TB2K) with the link back to their story so they increase the eyeball count seeing their ads.

Oh, the things I could share about this "industry".

This is what he did in this specific case. The Sloan Kettering article is from 2018, well before Covid or the vaccines. While it mentions mRNA it was Mike Adams who took the liberty to make the connection with the vaccines and created his own version of the truth i.e. created the intrigue that would generate "discussion" and draw eyeballs to his web sites generating ad revenue. Sloan Kettering has not published anything making this connection.

The 250 click-bait web sites I mentioned were related to the company I was building data centers for in 2014-2015. They were doing the same thing that Mike Adams does to generate ad revenue across their many cross-linked web sites...intentionally embellishing real stories and events to gain interested viewer traffic to pump ad revenue. The company was making millions of dollars a month in profits and it was their ONLY income stream. Other than the cost of the data centers and the people to embellish the articles, their primary expense was buying Google ad words to drive traffic to these sites on a targeted basis. They made 2-3 Google ad words buys each day spending 10s of thousands of dollars each time.

As long as the ad revenue generated exceeded the Google ad word expense they made a nice gross profit which they gave to the employees in the form of 30% to 60% bonuses. Many of the employees salaries were already north of $100K BEFORE the bonuses.

This is a whole subculture on the web. MANY companies do this to accomplish nothing more than generating ad revenue. They couldn't care less about the truthfulness of what they write as long as it trended and drew in those eyeballs.

Discernment is key.

NaturalNews.com and vaccines.news, the referenced links in the article in the OP, are both owned by Mike Adams.

Take a look at:

Rand Paul News | Rand Paul News & Updates
Gorsuch News | Gorsuch News – Gorsuch Information
Vote Fraud News | Vote Fraud News – Vote Fraud Information

Notice the identical format? These are also Mike Adams web sites.

Another common format:

Trump News | Trump News
White House News | White House News

Also Mike Adams sites. Notice they are all linked in the top banner of each site.

Here is a link that details Mike Adams-owned domains which is as of 2015, six years ago but has been updated a bit along the way. He has many more domains today. Some of the ones below are now dormant 6 years later. He posts the same article on multiple of these web sites and then cross-references them to make it look like different web sites have picked up the story.

Brilliant, true, and long past due! Thank you, brother, for this awesome explanation.
 

Hfcomms

EN66iq
Brilliant, true, and long past due! Thank you, brother, for this awesome explanation.

I didn’t know the background. What I did know is that Mike Adams is a sensationalist and any that comes from him needs to be cross verified. And since he knows that therefore the multiple websites that appear unrelated that cross reference each other in a circular firing squad. The Sorcha Faal websites under different names do the same thing.
 

Sicario

The Executor
I didn’t know the background. What I did know is that Mike Adams is a sensationalist and any that comes from him needs to be cross verified. And since he knows that therefore the multiple websites that appear unrelated that cross reference each other in a circular firing squad. The Sorcha Faal websites under different names do the same thing.
You can say that again. :applaud:
 

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap
Well, I got this article in my inbox from the folks at the Truth about cancer, and I see this potential truth as another dot.

Everything in this thread is valuable, though. Thank you for the explanation above, Mr. Gandillon!
 

subnet

Boot
Destroy the messenger to destroy the message.
See post 14
The message was BS to begin with, per the main source used for the article in question.
This is the same kind of crap pulled with the Pot cures cancer crap, no one read the studies they just read the head lines ...vet the stories before running with them.
 

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap
Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg expressed concern over “long-term side effects” of “modifying people’s DNA and RNA” in a leaked video
by Jenny Mount · Feb 17th, 2021 2:16 pm

Last Updated Feb 18th, 2021 at 10:51 pm
A video leaked to Project Veritas shows the Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg expressing concern over "long-term side effects" of "basically modifying people's DNA and RNA."

Zuckerberg made the comments in a video call with employees on July 16, 2020.

"I Share Some Caution on this [Vaccine] Because We Just Don't Know the Long-Term Side Effects of Basically Modifying People's DNA and RNA" I wonder if @Facebook will remove this video of Mark Zuckerberg? #ExposeZuck


View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1361854002024116228

"I share some caution on this, because we just don't know the long-term side effects of basically modifying people's DNA and RNA," Zuckerberg said.
In a later interview with Dr. Anthony Fauci, Zuckerberg said his "understanding is that these vaccines do not modify your DNA or RNA."

"First of all, DNA is inherent in your own nucleus cell — sticking in anything foreign will ultimately get cleared," Fauci said upon confirming Zuckerberg's comments.
While it is unknown whether Zuckerberg was talking about COVID-19 vaccines in the leaked video, there has been public concern about the vaccines altering people's DNA and RNA, which Facebook identified as "misinformation."

Facebook's current list of prohibited COVID-19 content includes, "Claims that the COVID-19 vaccine changes people's DNA."

James O'Keefe, founder of Project Veritas, said that Zuckerberg does not live up to the standards that he imposes on his users.
"Isn't it interesting that Zuckerberg can vacillate and evolve his thinking on the subject of vaccines. But as soon as he's made up his mind, or appears to have made up his mind on a topic, he disallows the almost 3 billion Facebook users to do the same," O'Keefe said. "Rules for thee, but not for me."
 
Last edited:

Border Collie Dad

Flat Earther
See post 14
The message was BS to begin with, per the main source used for the article in question.
This is the same kind of crap pulled with the Pot cures cancer crap, no one read the studies they just read the head lines ...vet the stories before running with them.

Absolutely, especially when the messenger has an established track record of twisting, distorting and manipulating real news into money-making, click-bait bullshit.

I have no axe to grind for or against Mike Adams.
I have heard him speak on some "alternative" health documentaries that I do give credence to.

I don't have the knowledge to prove or disprove the OP
 

Tortie

Veteran Member
Another shocker regarding the Pfizer Covid shot: It is still in phase 1 of the study to see if it is safe If someone harasses for not getting the shot, just tell them you prefer to wait till they determine if it is safe in January 2023.

(Meaning no disrespect to those who choose to get the shot)

Replying to
@TamaraUgo
Trial set to end, JANUARY 2023. <https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04368728…>

Study to Describe the Safety, Tolerability, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of RNA Vaccine Candidates...
Study to Describe the Safety, Tolerability, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of RNA Vaccine Candidates Against COVID-19 in Healthy Individuals - Full Text View.
clinicaltrials.gov
 

Macgyver

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Does anyone have a link to the actual source (sloan kettering) he's quoting?
Or should I just consider this made up based in the op's source?
 

subnet

Boot
I have no axe to grind for or against Mike Adams.
I have heard him speak on some "alternative" health documentaries that I do give credence to.

I don't have the knowledge to prove or disprove the OP
Nor do I, but I like to read the sources for the claims in general, as I have run with things before and ended up looking more foolish than the norm...lol
 

Kris Gandillon

The Other Curmudgeon
_______________
Does anyone have a link to the actual source (sloan kettering) he's quoting?
Or should I just consider this made up based in the op's source?
It is linked in the OP.


RIF.

The article is from 2018 as I noted in my post above...before Covid and before the vaccines. He invented the correlation to enhance his story.
 

Meemur

Voice on the Prairie / FJB!
Sloan Kettering used to be trustworthy! However, these days, I don't trust any institution that receives government funding.
 

Groucho

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Does anyone have a link to the actual source (sloan kettering) he's quoting?
Or should I just consider this made up based in the op's source?
It's in the original article. In a Twist, Scientists Find Cancer Drivers Hiding in RNA, Not DNA

What's most interesting is the "Summery" at the beginning of the article. "It’s important to note that mRNAs are a normal component of all cells and the specific ones discussed here are not involved in mRNA-based vaccines, like the one developed against SARS-CoV-2. "

Such action on the part of Natural News makes the article look like a giant click bait scam or some sort of twisted .gov psyop.
I have to constantly remind myself to CHECK THE SOURCES.

Just because it's on the Internet doesn't mean it's true.

Which brings up a serious question for the curmudgeons here. Does a story like this get scrubbed, lest people see the headline and just believe, or let it ride and hope that the truth will out?

I believe in the freedom of speech. I do not believe in the freedom to lie. Trouble is, there are some very talented liars out there.
 

Double_A

TB Fanatic
Did you read the sources?
One quote
"It’s important to note that mRNAs are a normal component of all cells and the specific ones discussed here are not involved in mRNA-based vaccines, like the one developed against SARS-CoV-2. "
Kinda takes the wind out of the headline........

It's not so much what Natural News says, it's what they don't say. Then at a later date I later find out that their article left something very important out. "Omission of Facts" comes to mind and consistently annoys me with Natural News.
 
Top