ALERT Confirmed:Joint Chiefs of Staff memo: The Armed forces attest that they will take civilian orders to ensure the inauguration of Joe Biden.

Status
Not open for further replies.
somewherepress

somewherepress

Has No Life - Lives on TB
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1349098892936294400
View: https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1349098892936294400
Note/Confirmed at link below

news.usni.org

Message from Joint Chiefs on U.S. Capitol Riot - USNI News

The following is the Jan. 12, 2021 message to U.S. troops from the Joint Chiefs of Staff. MEMORANDUM FOR THE JOINT FORCE SUBJECT: MESSAGE TO THE JOINT FORCE The American people have trusted the Armed Forces of the United States to protect them and our Constitution for almost 250 years. As we...
news.usni.org news.usni.org

Joint Chiefs of Staff memo to troops: The military will obey lawful orders from civilian leadership, support civil authorities to protect lives and property, ensure public safety in accordance with the law, and remain committed to protecting the Constitution (Reuters)1610486312970.png

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1349102617515974662
View: https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1349102617515974662/photo/1
 
Last edited:
R

raven

TB Fanatic
a statement like this has never been required before.
there has never been a question that the Military would behave in a certain manner.

However, with the question to the Joint Chiefs about codes, calls for the 25th, calls for impeachment, censure
and the ongoing hints from "who knows where really" about martial law and indictments and shenanigans,
I expect someone thought it was a good idea to state the matter clearly
 
D

dvo

Veteran Member
Yeah...it’s over. Hell awaits. Boy...hope is a thin reed to hang onto. I await orders, but nobody is going to call. I’m going to have to be greyer than grey. I’ll continue to pray, but sometimes God’s will if difficult to understand.
 
O

Ogre

Veteran Member
And Disclose.tv is a trusted source? Any of the MSM carrying this?
(I'm too lazy to look for myself.)
 
crossbowboy

crossbowboy

Certifiable
I don't care if it makes you popular, mmkay?

That's bad, mmkay? It's BAD.

ETA: Sorry, it's a "South Park" (horrible cartoon tv show) reference. It's all I got...
 
ArisenCarcass

ArisenCarcass

Veteran Member
"....confirmed by the states and courts....."

I read that some of the contested states have decertified the results.
And the courts refused to act........save for Obama-appointed political hacks, who are clearly not fit to even have the word "Justice" in the same sentence.
 
Meadowlark

Meadowlark

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Well I would expect that as that is their jobs. Its just an effort to allay all these ML rumors.
 
Mikiekimi

Mikiekimi

I’m just here for the gasoline...
Melodi said:
Someone in the military please correct me if I am wrong, but I suspect it also means - so "get in line with the program and don't attend protests or post anything else on social media."
Click to expand...
I didn't quite get that in the memo, but in general US military members (while on active duty) are subject to both civil law AND the articles listed in the UCMJ. The UCMJ spells out limitations on political activities quite explicitly (what you can and can't do...as a civilian, when in uniform, etc...). UCMJ = Uniform Code of Military Justice...the military's 'laws'.

If a superior officer issues a lawful order for you to not do something...and you do it anyway...you violate articles of the UCMJ and can be subject to criminal prosecution (trial by courts-martial) and face penalties all the way to the death penalty. There may have been orders prohibiting members from traveling to DC (or out of their immediate location) on or about the 6th. Those orders, if issued, are lawful orders designed to maintain good order and discipline.

When in uniform, you are afforded all the rights of a citizen WITHIN the bounds of the UCMJ. It's not that the constitution does not apply...but it applies within the confines of the UCMJ, DoD Directives, US Code, etc...

Any military member that trespassed onto the capitol grounds can not only be tried in a civil court, but can face administrative action or action under the UCMJ if the lawyers get creative enough. Using my example above of an order not to travel to DC...a member could be arrested for trespassing, etc AND be tried by courts-martial for violating the lawful order (Article 91 or 92 of the UCMJ).

Another example...there are laws on the books against drinking and driving...you get arrested downtown for a DUI not only will you be charged, but you may also face administrative action OR possible UCMJ action. So the member would face civil fines, a criminal record, possibly an administrative demotion, article 15 (non-judicial punishment), separation, or possibly courts-martial.

Military members know they can participate in a political rally while not in uniform, but that DOES NOT extend to trespassing, unlawful entry, destruction of property, interfering with government business, etc...

This was kind of my job for the last half dozen years or so in the military. I wasn't JAG, but I worked closely with USAF Security Forces and AFOSI.
 
WTSR

WTSR

Veteran Member
Communists and Socialists are the Minorities, they require the reins of the government to enforce their agendas.

I wonder if these JCS will be so bold when they go full Fascist on the people.
 
Meadowlark

Meadowlark

Has No Life - Lives on TB
When you pledge to defend the flag and the republic for which it stands, you surrender your first amendment rights. Utter or show contempt to our nation or its leaders while in the service and you will be subject to criminal prosecution.
 
Meadowlark

Meadowlark

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Mikiekimi said:
I didn't quite get that in the memo, but in general US military members (while on active duty) are subject to both civil law AND the articles listed in the UCMJ. The UCMJ spells out limitations on political activities quite explicitly (what you can and can't do...as a civilian, when in uniform, etc...). UCMJ = Uniform Code of Military Justice...the military's 'laws'.

If a superior officer issues a lawful order for you to not do something...and you do it anyway...you violate articles of the UCMJ and can be subject to criminal prosecution (trial by courts-martial) and face penalties all the way to the death penalty. There may have been orders prohibiting members from traveling to DC (or out of their immediate location) on or about the 6th. Those orders, if issued, are lawful orders designed to maintain good order and discipline.

When in uniform, you are afforded all the rights of a citizen WITHIN the bounds of the UCMJ. It's not that the constitution does not apply...but it applies within the confines of the UCMJ, DoD Directives, US Code, etc...

Any military member that trespassed onto the capitol grounds can not only be tried in a civil court, but can face administrative action or action under the UCMJ if the lawyers get creative enough.

For example...there are laws on the books against drinking and driving...you get arrested downtown for a DUI not only will you be charged, but you may also face administrative action OR possible UCMJ action. So the member would face civil fines, a criminal record, possibly an administrative demotion, article 15 (non-judicial punishment), separation, or possibly courts-martial.

Military members know they can participate in a political rally while not in uniform, but that DOES NOT extend to trespassing, unlawful entry, destruction of property, interfering with government business, etc...

This was kind of my job for the last half dozen years or so in the military. I wasn't JAG, but I worked closely with USAF Security Forces and AFOSI.
Click to expand...
No they cannot. See my post.
 
S

Squid

Veteran Member
I don’t believe the media. End of story.

Although, I listen and consider
Could this be valid, yes.
Could this be like the deep stater State Department ‘hacking’ the website, yes
Could this be true but be slightly disconnected from the whole story, yes
Was this put out by political Pentagon hacks under direction of deep state because stuff is happening that we don’t know about, maybe

As always Hope for the best, prepare for the worst, and take what comes.

I think things are fluid, could be the deep state won and the Republic as we know it is toast, could be something else.

Regardless everything will be settled shortly.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top