OP-ED Kurt Schlichter: The GOP Senate Damn Well Better Confirm Whoever POTUS Appoints

The GOP Senate Damn Well Better Confirm Whoever POTUS Appoints

Kurt Schlichter
Posted: Sep 20, 2020 12:01 AM

Perhaps it is glib to observe that, at the end of the day, Republicans should confirm a replacement for Justice Ginsburg because they can confirm a replacement for Justice Ginsburg, but there is a lot of truth to that observation. They can do it because the president has the power under the Constitution to appoint a nominee (I expect it to be Amy Coney Barrett, but Barbara Lagoa is a possibility and a great one), plus because the Senate has the power under the Constitution to confirm said nominee. And they better do it, because the Democrats intend to crush us if they can, and if the GOP wimps out, our voters will melt down.

The GOP can do this, so the GOP must.

There are lots of arguments floating around, often supported by old tweets and video clips, about how people said this and that about what should happen in similar situations (I note that many of these ignore important facts that distinguish the situations, like the president and Senate are held by the same party now but were not when Merrick Garland was rejected). There are appeals to unwritten rules that always seem to restrain Republicans, and one of the many amusing things about this whole situation is that the wailing Democrats have not even hinted that they would hesitate if the situation was reversed. There are rules and norms cited, and precedent asserted, and none of it matters. The GOP has the power to do it, and I expect it will attempt to do it since unilateral surrender because Democrats will get mad is simply not going to fly with the base. This is the Big Enchilada. This is why we have a GOP president and GOP Senate, to do this one crucial thing. And a GOP that won’t is a GOP the base has no more use for.

So, save the twisted pseudo-moral arguments for the saps. Look back to the Peloponnesian War. Athens and Sparta were at each other’s throats. Melos was a little island city-state that just wanted to be neutral. Athens came along and told Melos you have to join us or we will wipe you off the map. The reason was that allowing Melos to withstand Athens would make Athens look weak and encourage other city-states to resist. Melos was very upset, and in the Melian Dialogue recorded by Thucydides made a bunch of arguments about why Athens should not do as it saw fit. Athens essentially replied that it could do it, so it would do it, and too bad. Melos refused to yield and got wiped off the map.

It is not a perfect analogy, but let’s call the GOP Athens. However, we can’t quite call the Democrats Melos. Melos (at least as depicted by Thucydides) was not an enemy of Athens. The Democrats are. They already announced, while the Energizer Justice was still going and going, that they intend to nuke the filibuster, expand and pack the Supreme Court, create four new Democrat senators out of the new states of DC and Puerto Rico, wave the citizenship wand over 11 million illegal aliens, and make millions of Americans felons for having guns – and that’s just a start. They are committed to a comprehensive plan to lock-in power for themselves forever at the expense of the GOP.

That’s not just speculation. They have said it. That’s their plan. They are going to launch an unprecedented assault on us with the intention of forever utterly disenfranchising us.

So, why again is it immoral that the GOP use the power it won via elections to exercise the power given it during those terms of office, especially in an existential crisis? It’s as if Melos was preparing an invasion fleet but argued, “I can’t believe you are doing this to us, Athens – we aren’t going to invade you for another six months!”

Here comes the headline from lying liberal dummies for liberal dummies: “SCHLICHTER SIDES WITH ATHENS IN MELIAN DIALOGUES.” Luckily, ancient Greek classics are racist, sexist, cisgender exercises in racism, so no libs will know what the hell that lie even means.

We keep hearing how important it is for us to be bound by the norms and rules the Democrats are not only trashing but that they have already told us that they intend to further trash. Let’s assume we’re good little submissives like the Bulwark types and David Brooks and the rest of the establishment toadies demand we be. What then?

Do we gingerly walk into the post-election lawfare ambush that the Democrats have promised with SCOTUS at 4-4 (I also note how absolutely everyone assumes that Justice John Roberts will totally side with the liberal pro-Democrat bloc)? Since Biden’s puppetmasters have already announced that he can never concede ever, there’s no time when the Demos would say “Okay, you’re legit. You get to appoint someone.” They never have so far. Remember how, before Party Hearty Brett’s alleged sex gang affiliation became the big issue, the narrative was Trump couldn’t legitimately nominate a justice because he was under the deep, dark cloud of (manufactured) suspicion about RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA!?

And if he loses in November (Until Ginsberg died, I thought Trump was on a glidepath to victory, but it’s not clear how this wild card will affect the correlation of forces), do we just waive the last six months of Trump’s term, which is compounded by how the Mueller baloney made us already give up about two years of his term to that nonsense?

There’s no situation where they will ever agree that Trump is a legitimate president, and therefore that you and I can legitimately have a say in our own governance. We never get their thumbs-up to pick a replacement for RBG no matter what.

In a paradigm of norms and rules, Amy Coney Barrett or Barbara Lagoa would sail through a quick confirmation process (they both just passed one a couple years ago to get on the Circuit Court of Appeals). Instead, we’ll be subjected to a long line of lies about how the nominee is a religious nut and a secret Nazi and loves Q and how she groped a bunch of timid liberal males who were totally shattered by her vicious assaults in 1981 near the water fountain at George Washington Junior High.

Athens cut to the chase when dealing with Melos – it could and it was going to. And the GOP should do the same and cut to the chase. It can and it must because it’s dealing with people who have already promised an all-out assault on our rights and sovereignty.

We either win, or they go down the path of trying to ensure that our interests and rights never again interfere with their unrestrained exercise of power again. And that leads to a dark place.

Appoint and confirm, GOP. Do it, because you can, and because you must.

It ain't THAT dark a place, since the incoming fire will light things up pretty well, as will the Pyres and bonfires.

Besides as anyone who has destroyed a body knows, once you get the body to the right temperature, fat burns QUITE brightly if you provide a wick.

On the off chance I am not the only ignorant one here:


(Not precisely hard on the eyes)


Judge Logoa:
Justice Barbara Lagoa was born in Miami, Florida. She received her Bachelor of Arts cum laude in 1989 from Florida International University where she majored in English and was a member of the Phi Kappa Phi honor society. Justice Lagoa received her Juris Doctor from Columbia University School of Law in 1992, where she served as an Associate Editor of the Columbia Law Review. She is fluent in English and Spanish.

On January 9, 2019, she became the first Hispanic woman and the first Cuban American woman appointed to serve on the Florida Supreme Court. Prior to her appointment by Governor Ron DeSantis to the Florida Supreme Court, Governor Jeb Bush appointed her in June of 2006 to serve on the Third District Court of Appeal. At that court, she became the first Hispanic woman and the first Cuban American woman appointed to serve on the Third District Court of Appeal. On January 1, 2019, she became the first Hispanic female Chief Judge of the Third District Court of Appeal.

Prior to joining the bench, Justice Lagoa practiced in both the civil and criminal arenas. Her civil practice at Greenberg Traurig focused on general and complex commercial litigation, particularly the areas of employment discrimination, business torts, securities litigation, construction litigation, and insurance coverage disputes. In 2003, she joined the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida as an Assistant United States Attorney, where she worked in the Civil, Major Crimes and Appellate Sections. As an Assistant United States Attorney, she tried numerous criminal jury trials, including drug conspiracies and Hobbs Act violations. She also handled a significant number of appeals.

While a practicing lawyer, Justice Lagoa was admitted to The Florida Bar, the United States District Courts for the Middle and Southern Districts of Florida, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. She was also a member of many local, state, and national professional groups including the Dade County Bar Association, and the Florida Association for Women Lawyers.

Justice Lagoa’s civic and community activities include service on the Board of Directors for the YWCA of Greater Miami and Dade County, the Film Society of Miami, Kristi House, and the FIU Alumni Association. She was also a member of the Federal Judicial Nominating Commission. She is currently a member of the Eugene P. Spellman and William Hoeveler Chapter of the American Inns of Court.

Justice Lagoa is married to Paul C. Huck, Jr., an attorney. They have three daughters. Justice Lagoa left the Florida Supreme Court on December 6, 2019, when she received her commission as a judge on the U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals based in Atlanta from President Donald Trump.

Barbara Lagoa. Confirmed 85-15 in 2019 by the Senate.

Enough of broads, Hispanics, Jews, and leftists on the US Supreme Court. I want a blond 30-YO version of Bork or Scalia to replace the radical feminist antiwhite racist traitor Ginsberg.

Going into what is already acknowledged as a contested election before a single vote is cast and also knowing it's going to end up in the Supreme Court we can't have an eight judge court. Roberts is dirty so more often then not when something crucial to TPTB is on the line like Obamacare, Roberts will vote the way he is told.

It's very possible that if the election results go to the Supreme Court it's going to be a 4-4 tie which means no decision or it means letting whatever decision the appeals court makes stand. That will guarantee the dissolution of any form of constitutional government. There needs to be a nine justice court that can render a decision/or it has to be such a blowout election that there is no way it can be contested.

This election might very well be the black swan event that finally brings the U.S. down into a real civil war. The left has already made it clear that having Trump re-elected is not an option for them as they will have riots erupt all over the place and the right is not going to abide the election being stolen out from under their noses this time. Trump either has to win convincingly or if it ends up in a eight Justice SC we well might find ourselves in a second civil war with both sides thinking they have the moral high ground.

Nothing good will come from it.

MinnesotaSmith said:

Enough of broads, Hispanics, Jews, and leftists on the US Supreme Court. I want a blond 30-YO version of Bork or Scalia to replace the radical feminist antiwhite traitor Ginsberg.

Click to expand...

Agreed. Still too much estrogen on the bench as it is. Emotion does not a good jurist make.

From the Comments section on the Schlicter article:

We're facing the bared teeth of a Bolshevik revolution: the small hats running it have no intentions of letting Christians and Whites survive (past is prologue): the limp-wristed, oh-so-polite, bow-tied Republicans will be dead and thrown in the same mass graves as we deplorables.

To which someone else responded:

Yep. The bow-tied East Coast snots who used to run the party will book a cruise ship to discuss the issue for the next 6 months and then issue a strongly worded letter to Trump written in Latin about building bridges and hands across the aisle.

So what it comes down to is, the left will riot all over this country, until they get their way.
Yeah, it sounds like 'mob rule' thinking to me.
I wonder if they truely realize what they are asking for?

No, they don't. Because so few of them have had the experience of playing on a 2 (or 3 or 4) way range... A 360 plus elevation range.

RBG ALSO said (it's on Breitbart today) - that it's a bad idea to change the number of justices on the SC, completely blowing Holder's statement that there is such a thing as "illegitimace conservative majority" on the court... OUT OF THE WATER.

thompson said:

Barbara Lagoa. Confirmed 85-15 in 2019 by the Senate.

Click to expand...

Yet she will barely make it through if nominated again.....

If the moronic high end stores have bothered to restock downtown shops they nearly deserve to be looted again. The rioters need to be confined to their own neighborhoods so they can sh*t where they eat just like the 60s. Burn it all down no matter what. It's going to be cold out though and that deters the rioting to somewhere in Cali. If there is ANY discomfort or work the blacks will not do it. Their slave masters will issue the edict and they will stay home.

You boys better PRAY Trump nominates a woman.

If he doesn't there will be all kinds a sh*+ to pay.

The DEMON-RATS are already foaming at the mouth and if he goes with a male, he will probably not get them on the court.
She is experienced, intelligent and has ethnicity to boot, in addition to being female. She is second generation Cuban and is probably the daughter of one of the Peter Pan flight kids>>>>>don't know what that is?? Look it up. It is a very significant part of American loyalty!!!

Besides, women are more likely to be LOYAL to the ones who nominated them.

Want proof?? Go to any male prison>>>>note all the women visiting their loser husbands.

THEN>>>>>go to a women's prison>>>>note the LACK of men visiting their loser wives and girl friends.

Little boys are always afraid of their mothers. That is the only reason I can discern for all the recent woman hating that has come out on this board>>>>like not wanting women to vote.

I am a strong, experienced woman>>>I "BELONG" to no man. NO man has EVER supported me, or paid my way. I have ALWAYS been the wage earner and done the majority of the work in my home. I have ALWAYS been a land owner and paid taxes.

Finally, all of the women who have been, or currently are, on the SCOTUS have been libertards and DEMON-RATS. THAT is the cause of the emotionalism. I can GUARANTEE this woman, as the child of Cuban immigrants, will NOT be a libertard. She has a family that has endured WAYYYYY more intense situations than ANY man on this board>>>>EXCEPT the COMBAT VETS on here!!

ioujc said:

You boys better PRAY Trump nominates a woman.

If he doesn't there will be all kinds a sh*+ to pay.

The DEMON-RATS are already foaming at the mouth and if he goes with a male, he will probably not get them on the court.
She is experienced, intelligent and has ethnicity to boot, in addition to being female. She is second generation Cuban and is probably the daughter of one of the Peter Pan flight kids>>>>>don't know what that is?? Look it up. It is a very significant part of American loyalty!!!

Besides, women are more likely to be LOYAL to the ones who nominated them.

Want proof?? Go to any male prison>>>>note all the women visiting their loser husbands.

THEN>>>>>go to a women's prison>>>>note the LACK of men visiting their loser wives and girl friends.

Little boys are always afraid of their mothers. That is the only reason I can discern for all the recent woman hating that has come out on this board>>>>like not wanting women to vote.

I am a strong, experienced woman>>>I "BELONG" to no man. NO man has EVER supported me, or paid my way. I have ALWAYS been the wage earner and done the majority of the work in my home. I have ALWAYS been a land owner and paid taxes.

Click to expand...

1) Being Cuban is a negative. No more nonAmericans in American political offices. 2) Don't make me laugh re women being more loyal than men. Were it true, women would not be the vast majority of frivorcers. 3) A woman who belongs to no man, who is not connected or tied to one, is by definition a loose woman. Given the median morals and societal productivity of such, it's not exactly something to brag about.

Sometimes in life timing is everything. The timing of this event, and the upcoming confirmation vote, may either be what makes America Great Again, or the final nail in the coffin.

Watching Trumps "Protest of Stupidity" in Fayetteville NC last night, he asked the crowd if the replacement should be a man or woman. The crowd went nuts over it being a woman, and was very quite over it being a man.

My guess is it is going to be a woman.

Lagoa could be a good strategic move. If she can be sold to the Mexican Hispanics as one of theirs, a Dem stance against her could go a long way politically to bringing more Hispanics into the Republican fold. Trouble is, I don't know if regular Hispanics in the south and west identify with a Cuban as one of their own. It is also more difficult to mire her in rape charges.

Too many women and we become Europe

marsh said:

Lagoa could be a good strategic move. If she can be sold to the Mexican Hispanics as one of theirs, a Dem stance against her could go a long way politically to bringing more Hispanics into the Republican fold. Trouble is, I don't know if regular Hispanics in the south and west identify with a Cuban as one of their own. It is also more difficult to mire her in rape charges.

Click to expand...

Hispanics/Latinos all have a burning hatred of each other.

I don't believe the Republican Senators will vote for a new Justice, they lack the balls to perform their duty. The House is rushing back to try to block Trump but they refused to return to vote on a new stimulus bill which should show anyone with a quarter of a brain the Democratics don't care about average suffering American families, they only care about their own power. It's very sad that so many can't see this, they're blinded by their hate for the President and when asked why they hate him, they repeat the media's talking points and can't put any details behind their hate.

Not all women are the same MNSmith. Why don't you give it a rest?

It doesn't speak well of your ability to understand that you will always miss a lot of spots if you paint with such a broad brush.

The GOP Senate Damn Well Better Confirm Whoever POTUS Appoints

OR WHAT?

Gonna send them to bed without any supper?

MinnesotaSmith said:

1) Being Cuban is a negative. No more nonAmericans in American political offices. 2) Don't make me laugh re women being more loyal than men. Were it true, women would not be the vast majority of frivorcers. 3) A woman who belongs to no man, who is not connected or tied to one, is by definition a loose woman. Given the median morals and societal productivity of such, it's not exactly something to brag about.

Click to expand...

... and tiptoe through the minefield with me!

Ted Cruz Schools Georgie Stephanopoulos on Past Supreme Court Nominations

R/T - 1:35

View: https://twitter.com/RNCResearch/status/1307685364291825667

Mn Smith said:
1) Being Cuban is a negative. No more nonAmericans in American political offices. 2) Don't make me laugh re women being more loyal than men. Were it true, women would not be the vast majority of frivorcers. 3) A woman who belongs to no man, who is not connected or tied to one, is by definition a loose woman. Given the median morals and societal productivity of such, it's not exactly something to brag about.

You are so full of manure.

1.) You OBVIOUSLY know NOTHING about people of Cuban ancestry. Most of them are FAR, FAR more patriotic and love America WAYYYY more than Americans!! Because they KNOW what communism is and have EXPERIENCED it>>>>or their family has. I seriously doubt that you have any knowledge what so ever of what the Peter Pan and Freedom Flights were. She IS an American; she was born in this country. Being so narrow minded indicates your lack of intellect. You may be smart in book knowledge, but have no capacity to expand your knowledge beyond what you yourself experience>>>sort of like an idiot savant.

2.) Frivorcers>>>yeah, I think they called Mary, the mother of Jesus, that too. Nope, does not describe me. Married the first time for 17 years to a 12 year old in disguise, who thought life consisted of New York Yankee baseball games. He and I wrote a book together about the Yankees and after it sold it's max in book stores, we bought the remaiderings and made BIG BUCKS because I negotiated the deal and refused to pay more than 1/3 of what Simon and Schuster were asking. I then designed the mailer and we sold EVERY copy. His idea of work was crunching RBIs and errors. I worked not only my job but was the lead in the home business too>>>plus did all the house work and cooked all the meals. Getting him to mow the lawn every other week was an accomplishment. You may have heard of him, he was on the Art Rust Jr. show a number of times. He, like most men, never acknowledged any of the support his wife provided. My second husband was a totally disabled Nam vet. I have spoken of him previously and loved him very much until he died>>>>

3.) No, I am not a "loose" woman, just independent and self sufficient. I could not bear children so I was able to give all of my energy to my career, and was something of a success in my own field. I also have to my credit the authorship of original research which was requested by ERIC and presented at several state conferences of colleges. I don't have the time or energy to be "loose." I was raised as a tomboy and was the son my Dad never had. Therefore I know about things that make most men embarrassed>>>being able to pour concrete, lay field lines, build framing and raise any animal successfully. I may have a different skill set than you, but mine is just as vital and important. You Minnesota, remind me of someone I used to go to church with. He was so full of himself, he was an embarrassment to everyone who knew him. He thought he was "Oh so special" because he had two Master's degrees! He was a teacher at the local high school and so full of hubris he was swelled to twice his normal size!! I only have one Master's degree, but it is adequate for me.

GOD bless our great President Trump and let him make the correct Justice one who will be staunchly pro Constitution and conservative for the next 50 years of their seat on the Supreme Court

ioujc said:

Little boys are always afraid of their mothers. That is the only reason I can discern for all the recent woman hating that has come out on this board>>>>like not wanting women to vote

Click to expand...

Evidently you simply ignore when people describe WHY they think women shouldn’t have the vote.

They have created such an uproar which skirts advocating overthrow of the government (I believe this has already occurred)
that Trump is no longer able to delay
if he does it damages the Authority of the Office.
He must appoint

No, Dennis, I don't. The stupid remarks are so interspersed with insults and crude comments >>>I don't read them.

So tell me succinctly, WHY should women not be allowed to vote. Make it short and sweet and not full of male testosterone BS.

Give me a reason OTHER THAN>>>>women are SO emotional and Women do't own property or pay taxes or they take too much leave for having babies. I will listen to YOU>>>for a LITTLE while anyway. Oh, and "they don't serve in the military">>>I tried to join three times, (great officer career path!!) however my vision was not correctable>>>no depth perception>>>at all.

ioujc said:

Give me a reason OTHER THAN>>>>women are SO emotional

Click to expand...

But that’s the root of it. Voting is for the betterment of the country, not for feelz. Now, INTJ and ENTJ women can be trusted to think rather than emote. Now, I’m not saying that men don’t emote (particularly the soy-boi so-called “men” of today’s generation.) Actually, I think a personality test should be given to both genders, and the “feelz” folk should be disenfranchised.

All that is background for this: statistically speaking, women emote in vastly greater numbers than men. That is not a positive, and is ultimately fatal to the country.

Hope that helps.

Intestinal Fortitude said:

Too many women and we become Europe

Click to expand...

We already are!

Ummm. So people who feel should not vote.

Sorry, don't buy that one. I am not a particularly "emoting" female>>>like I said, I was the son my Daddy never had. My basic "feelings" focus around protectiveness, for those of my family, my group and my country. And my FLAG!! I am way more protective of that symbol than most of the military guys I know now a days.

I don't think you can equate the slide into liberalism to women. After all, it was the COMMIE "big boys" like FDR, Woodrow Wilson and LBJ, NOT women who pushed us into the mess we are in.

If you want to say that only land owners should vote, that makes a LOT more sense!! They would be a lot less likely to emote themselves out of their property and institute "freebies for all" because they are aware of who pays for it in the long run. This applies to male and female land owners alike.

IN your view of things, then, the woman who never married or is a widow would be without a voice in her own country, regardless of her accomplishments, wealth or standing. Not quite a fair deal. Especially considering some of the men I have known. For example, my first husband, who had to be told when to change his underwear, and is now one of the biggest libertards I have ever meet.

But, you are certainly entitled to your opinion>>> And I don't really want to fight about it>>>not worth the effort really.

Personally, I think if people started thinking more instead of feeling we’d be a lot better off.

"ioujc, post:
You boys better PRAY Trump nominates a woman.

If he doesn't there will be all kinds a sh*+ to pay.

Who cares? Isn't there always hell to pay because the liberal socialist don't agree with us? As far as I have seen the only ones physically fighting back are BOYS. Where are you or the other GIRLS? You talk a good line, tell them you can do concrete or show them your degree that will stop them right in their tracks. HA

The DEMON-RATS are already foaming at the mouth and if he goes with a male, he will probably not get them on the court.

Have you not been paying attention? Our cities are already burning, Our fellow citizens are being attacked and murdered for being WHITE MALES in public by the SJW BLM ANTIFA REVOLUTIONARY ARMY with no consequences. Do you wear a MAGA HAT, T-SHIRT, OR FACE MASK in public? No! You hide behind your breast and ovaries while in public or you live in a small town where you are safe. Yet you feel your self-righteous indignation as a keyboard warrior is vindicated as you viciously attack any that engage in debate that disagree with your statements because you are EQUAL to any MAN.

She is experienced, intelligent and has ethnicity to boot, in addition to being female. She is second generation Cuban and is probably the daughter of one of the Peter Pan flight kids>>>>>don't know what that is?? Look it up. It is a very significant part of American loyalty!!!

Besides, women are more likely to be LOYAL to the ones who nominated them.

"Women are more loyal" So only MEN file for divorce or have affairs?

Want proof?? Go to any male prison>>>>note all the women visiting their loser husbands.

THEN>>>>>go to a women's prison>>>>note the LACK of men visiting their loser wives and girl friends.

Little boys are always afraid of their mothers. That is the only reason I can discern for all the recent woman hating that has come out on this board>>>>like not wanting women to vote.

Are you not familiar with the term "Momma's Boy's? Men devoted to the care and protection of their mother's.

I am a strong, experienced woman>>>I "BELONG" to no man. NO man has EVER supported me, or paid my way. I have ALWAYS been the wage earner and done the majority of the work in my home. I have ALWAYS been a land owner and paid taxes.

All your comments about males, illuminate for all to see....you're a feminazi who hates men. All your self aggrandizing statements are your own recitation of your internal resume noting how YOU are better than any MAN.

Finally, all of the women who have been, or currently are, on the SCOTUS have been libertards and DEMON-RATS. THAT is the cause of the emotionalism. I can GUARANTEE this woman, as the child of Cuban immigrants, will NOT be a libertard. She has a family that has endured WAYYYYY more intense situations than ANY man on this board>>>>EXCEPT the COMBAT VETS on here!!

As a INFANTRY COMBAT VETERAN myself I take great insult at you placing yourself as the JUDGE & JURY on intense situations experienced by everyone other than yourself. Have you ever been in combat? Then how would you know?

Having worked in many fields (I feel no need to list here) as well as attained graduate degrees (with honors) myself. I will profess anyone pursuing any degree or graduate degree before establishing their own moral and social character are overwhelmed by the immersion of social & emotional ideology of the secondary education system. So much so even the staunchest young Christian conservatives I have known have taken years sometimes decades to recover from the social & emotional indoctrination, some never fully recovering.

Your "GUARANTEE" this WOMAN "will not be a libtard" because she is A CUBAN FEMALE with intense situational experience that ONLY COMBAT VETERANS KNOW. Fills me with a desire to make a pilgrimage to your monument of YOU. Where is it located?

Mn Smith said:
1) Being Cuban is a negative. No more nonAmericans in American political offices. 2) Don't make me laugh re women being more loyal than men. Were it true, women would not be the vast majority of frivorcers. 3) A woman who belongs to no man, who is not connected or tied to one, is by definition a loose woman. Given the median morals and societal productivity of such, it's not exactly something to brag about.

You are so full of manure.

1.) You OBVIOUSLY know NOTHING about people of Cuban ancestry. Most of them are FAR, FAR more patriotic and love America WAYYYY more than Americans!! Because they KNOW what communism is and have EXPERIENCED it>>>>or their family has. I seriously doubt that you have any knowledge what so ever of what the Peter Pan and Freedom Flights were. She IS an American; she was born in this country. Being so narrow minded indicates your lack of intellect. You may be smart in book knowledge, but have no capacity to expand your knowledge beyond what you yourself experience>>>sort of like an idiot savant.

2.) Frivorcers>>>yeah, I think they called Mary, the mother of Jesus, that too. Nope, does not describe me. Married the first time for 17 years to a 12 year old in disguise, who thought life consisted of New York Yankee baseball games. He and I wrote a book together about the Yankees and after it sold it's max in book stores, we bought the remaiderings and made BIG BUCKS because I negotiated the deal and refused to pay more than 1/3 of what Simon and Schuster were asking. I then designed the mailer and we sold EVERY copy. His idea of work was crunching RBIs and errors. I worked not only my job but was the lead in the home business too>>>plus did all the house work and cooked all the meals. Getting him to mow the lawn every other week was an accomplishment. You may have heard of him, he was on the Art Rust Jr. show a number of times. He, like most men, never acknowledged any of the support his wife provided. My second husband was a totally disabled Nam vet. I have spoken of him previously and loved him very much until he died>>>>

Mary has never been accused of FRIVORCES. You might want to study the definition. It means gold digging, better dealing, or marrying up the social and monetary scale.

Married 17 years to a 12 year old in disguise... A lot of pent up hostility in this statement.

He, like most men, never acknowledged any of the support his wife provided....There's that hostility again.

My second husband was a totally disabled Nam vet.... That you did everything for because.....

So where again is the monument to you or is there a scheduled unveiling?

3.) No, I am not a "loose" woman, just independent and self sufficient. I could not bear children so I was able to give all of my energy to my career, and was something of a success in my own field. I also have to my credit the authorship of original research which was requested by ERIC and presented at several state conferences of colleges. I don't have the time or energy to be "loose." I was raised as a tomboy and was the son my Dad never had. Therefore I know about things that make most men embarrassed>>>being able to pour concrete, lay field lines, build framing and raise any animal successfully. I may have a different skill set than you, but mine is just as vital and important. You Minnesota, remind me of someone I used to go to church with. He was so full of himself, he was an embarrassment to everyone who knew him. He thought he was "Oh so special" because he had two Master's degrees! He was a teacher at the local high school and so full of hubris he was swelled to twice his normal size!! I only have one Master's degree, but it is adequate for me.

I hate to break this to you but most men aren't embarrassed about any of those things. Men today fall into 2 categories the soy boys created by women like you and our education system or what you refer to as low brow toxic masculine knuckle draggers.

It is your own jealousy of NOT being a man that fuels your hatred of men. This is evident in your need to constantly belittle and harangue all men while reciting your "I am as good as any man" resume. No matter your accomplishments intellectually, financially, or physically you will continually discover what the female transgenders realize once they THINK they are equal with every man... you're not. It is biologically impossible for men and women to be equal in every way.

Those low brow toxic masculine knuckle draggers you constantly deride conquered countless enemy, tamed the wild, built communities, and created governments, laws, medicine, art, literature, music, & philosophy. Along the way MEN studied, debated, & fought wars over their ideologies. The law of the jungle gave way to reason & logic. Where reason and logic were allowed to take root (after the wild was tamed) ideologies changed. Different sexes, races, & religion were recognized as equal but, only by the Western European Male. The world of law & order built by MEN made this possible & nothing else.

You directly benefit from this world. Don't believe me you are free to go to Africa or the Middle East and build your life. With all your skills you should have no problem. Please, go ahead and prove me wrong. I as many MEN here have traveled, drank, fought & gambled alone in foreign lands. We have gazed upon wonders the majority have only seen in pictures, lived with the stench of open sewers, and no health codes, walked through the open air markets making you wish for open air.

Your statements are venomous and hateful against the very society that gives you the opportunities for your victories & accomplishments of which you brag.

You will now inevitably flame me in a predictable diatribe of ad hominem attacks aggrandizing the lone woman changing history such as Sacajawea, Susan B. Anthony, or Harriet Tubman. While these stories dot our history NOW they only do so to appease the feminazis such as yourself.

But before you melt your keyboard with your response, answer me this; Name the woman that championed the suffrage act in the House? Senate? Name the woman Supreme Court Justice that confirmed it Constitutional? The woman President that signed it into law? Name a Non Western European Country or influenced country that recognizes the same women's rights as the US?

If you fail to answer the questions and wish to sink once again to your well evidenced ability of deriding & belittling comments (you know name calling) please refrain from responding. As I will not respond to your self loathing venomous hatred of MEN.

ioujc said:

I don't think you can equate the slide into liberalism to women.

Click to expand...

Yeah, actually you can. The fact that you disagree is immaterial.


And don’t extrapolate into things I didn’t say just because you’re

I don’t do drama. You wanna play that, take it someplace else.

Dennis Olson said:

But that’s the root of it. Voting is for the betterment of the country, not for feelz. Now, INTJ and ENTJ women can be trusted to think rather than emote. Now, I’m not saying that men don’t emote (particularly the soy-boi so-called “men” of today’s generation.) Actually, I think a personality test should be given to both genders, and the “feelz” folk should be disenfranchised.

All that is background for this: statistically speaking, women emote in vastly greater numbers than men. That is not a positive, and is ultimately fatal to the country.

Hope that helps.

Click to expand...

INTJ personality types are the rarest type of all. And female INTJ are the most rare; I have only met one.

ioujc said:

Mn Smith said:
1) Being Cuban is a negative. No more nonAmericans in American political offices. 2) Don't make me laugh re women being more loyal than men. Were it true, women would not be the vast majority of frivorcers. 3) A woman who belongs to no man, who is not connected or tied to one, is by definition a loose woman. Given the median morals and societal productivity of such, it's not exactly something to brag about.

You are so full of manure.

1.) You OBVIOUSLY know NOTHING about people of Cuban ancestry. Most of them are FAR, FAR more patriotic and love America WAYYYY more than Americans!! Because they KNOW what communism is and have EXPERIENCED it>>>>or their family has. I seriously doubt that you have any knowledge what so ever of what the Peter Pan and Freedom Flights were. She IS an American; she was born in this country. Being so narrow minded indicates your lack of intellect. You may be smart in book knowledge, but have no capacity to expand your knowledge beyond what you yourself experience>>>sort of like an idiot savant.

2.) Frivorcers>>>yeah, I think they called Mary, the mother of Jesus, that too. Nope, does not describe me. Married the first time for 17 years to a 12 year old in disguise, who thought life consisted of New York Yankee baseball games. He and I wrote a book together about the Yankees and after it sold it's max in book stores, we bought the remaiderings and made BIG BUCKS because I negotiated the deal and refused to pay more than 1/3 of what Simon and Schuster were asking. I then designed the mailer and we sold EVERY copy. His idea of work was crunching RBIs and errors. I worked not only my job but was the lead in the home business too>>>plus did all the house work and cooked all the meals. Getting him to mow the lawn every other week was an accomplishment. You may have heard of him, he was on the Art Rust Jr. show a number of times. He, like most men, never acknowledged any of the support his wife provided. My second husband was a totally disabled Nam vet. I have spoken of him previously and loved him very much until he died>>>>

3.) No, I am not a "loose" woman, just independent and self sufficient. I could not bear children so I was able to give all of my energy to my career, and was something of a success in my own field. I also have to my credit the authorship of original research which was requested by ERIC and presented at several state conferences of colleges. I don't have the time or energy to be "loose." I was raised as a tomboy and was the son my Dad never had. Therefore I know about things that make most men embarrassed>>>being able to pour concrete, lay field lines, build framing and raise any animal successfully. I may have a different skill set than you, but mine is just as vital and important. You Minnesota, remind me of someone I used to go to church with. He was so full of himself, he was an embarrassment to everyone who knew him. He thought he was "Oh so special" because he had two Master's degrees! He was a teacher at the local high school and so full of hubris he was swelled to twice his normal size!! I only have one Master's degree, but it is adequate for me.

Click to expand...

You sound like a real kool independent woman. I like strong women. I don't like weak people and have no respect for them. I admire strong people - men included.

Dennis Olson said:

But that’s the root of it. Voting is for the betterment of the country, not for feelz. Now, INTJ and ENTJ women can be trusted to think rather than emote. Now, I’m not saying that men don’t emote (particularly the soy-boi so-called “men” of today’s generation.) Actually, I think a personality test should be given to both genders, and the “feelz” folk should be disenfranchised.

All that is background for this: statistically speaking, women emote in vastly greater numbers than men. That is not a positive, and is ultimately fatal to the country.

Hope that helps.

Click to expand...

I have to agree with Dennis that women are way too emotional. Most of my close friends - the few i have - are all men. I believe men are more logical and work from the brain and not the emotions like the heart.