BRKG RUTH BADER GINSBURG DEAD (9/18/20)

Sammy55

Veteran Member
Exactly!

The "A-Team" is off for the weekend and the interns are at the helm on the weekend.

The weekends are dedicated to info-commercials and sports programming.

Actual news gathering is a fond memory of the past.

Even with pre-recorded heartfelt eulogies to Ginsburg, the networks were still slow to respond.

I'll speculate that many local affiliates were loath to give up so much commercial time. Our local Fox affiliate snapped back to "TMZ" as fast as they could. Well before other stations ended their Ginsburg coverage.
For this reason, I strongly believe that she just died today. If she had died before, and they were just waiting for a good time (for them) to announce it, they surely wouldn't have picked a time when the MSM goes to weekend mode. They would have done it near the beginning of the week when we would be hearing about her ad nauseum.

That and the fact that the Jewish people want quick burials. They would want her lying in state at the White House, and they won't do anything about that on their Holy Day (Saturday) and Sunday is the Christian Holy Day. So nothing will be done about her funeral stuff, probably, until next week.

Having her die on a Friday after business/media hours is not to their advantage.

I sure hope her dying just before the elections is also not to dem advantage. I'm afraid, as has been commented, that this will spur more dems to vote so that the SC doesn't become more conservative than it is now!
 

Cyclonemom

Veteran Member
Fox reporting that McConnell has released statement that Senate will vote on a Trump nominee.

Reporters doubtful that they can get it done before the election.

Why would it have to be done before the election? Why not until the night before inauguration?

As to the "Why now?" timing, that's easy.
They know they have no momentum. Hoping a Supreme Court Justice vote will encourage their base to get out of their basements and go vote.
 

Sicario

The Executor
tenor.gif
 

AlfaMan

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Folks, she kicked the bucket around 630 this evening from the rumbling I'm hearing. At home is what I'm hearing as well. Attended by at least one .mil doc. This wasn't a slow drug out death-apparently things went south with her pretty quickly this afternoon. Other SC justices were notified, Barr was notified-seems kinda slow that Pres Trump didn't get notified, although he was in the air on one of the C-32s. It's now outfitted much like AF1 in terms of communication equipment. Just caught his reaction as he was getting back on the C-32 to come back to Andrews. He looked genuinely startled, actually. Said whether or not one agreed with her, she led an amazing life. For totally off the cuff response to a govt. changing incident, I give Pres Trump an A. Handled it well.

I can imagine she's already gone up to the pearly gates-and has already been turned away. She's probably asking why the air conditioner where she's at isn't working.......................

If they let her lay in state at the capitol, this is one we are NOT going to pay respects to. As far as being the first of 3 to die, my money is on Jimmy Carter (who we will go to pay respects to) and......either Bill Clinton (heart attack) or.....wait for it.....George Soros. You heard it here first.

Uncle Joe is on now expressing grief for her death. Folks, he sounds like he just woke up. Surprisingly incoherent and he's mumbling/kind of slurring his words. Scary.
 

Macgyver

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Article mostly tweets go to link to read them.


"F*** You Ruth Bader Ginsburg - F*** You for Not Retiring Under Obama!" - Leftists React to RBG's Death
ginsburg-impeachment.jpg

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died on on Friday night surrounded by family at home.
She was 87.
The left is not taking this well.
They are lashing out at RBG for not retiring during the Obama years!


Here’s an eff you for Hillary hater Susan Sarandon.

Mike Cernovich
called it…
 

Squib

Veteran Member

Too bad, lady! For all the evil you allowed and defended...you have no right to wish for anything...

Besides, since Trump will get another 4 years, no one will wait for a “new President”.

Ask yourselves, what would the demons do?

They’d ram that SC nominee through like crap through a goose!

Business and life go on...they can officially mourn her passing and tell all kinds of lies about how great she was....but

Make sure and have a SC nominee on Mitch McConnells desk by Monday morning!
 

The Cub

Behold, I am coming soon.
Why would it have to be done before the election? Why not until the night before inauguration?

As to the "Why now?" timing, that's easy.
They know they have no momentum. Hoping a Supreme Court Justice vote will encourage their base to get out of their basements and go vote.

Correct.

I say get it done immediately.....put pressure on the Senators who are wobbly .......before the election.

Additionally, I expect that the SCOTUS may be needed in settling disputes re: the election. We can not count of Roberts. My guess is someone has something on him. [I still want to know who the John Roberts was on the Epstein airplane manefest.]
 
Last edited:

Doomer Doug

TB Fanatic
Well, the SCOTUS reality right now is as follows.

There are currently 8 judges left. Of those 8 judges, three are solid liberals, Kagan, Soto Major, and Breyer.
Two are conservative, Thomas, Kavanaugh. Three are closet liberals, Roberts, Gorsuch, and Alito

Depending on the case you will get 3 liberals, and up to 3 swing, or closet liberals. Roberts and the traitor Gorsuch can swing any "conservative" decision to a hard left decision by adding the 3 liberals to get you five or six votes.

The magnitude of Trump's decision in putting Gorsuch on the SCOTUS is only now starting to become clear. Roberts, well , IMHO, Epstein had something on him and that is that. Scalia was most likely murdered at the isolated ranch in Texas.

The RINOS will see Trump doesn't replace Ginsburg this year most likely. It will be 4 to 4 with two solid conservatives, two swing and three or 4 liberals which will be enough to get solid liberal decisions for years into the future. a lot of 4 to 4 decisions, but the democrats can live with that for a few more months.
 

auxman

Ad eundum quo nemo ante iit...
Well, the SCOTUS reality right now is as follows.

There are currently 8 judges left. Of those 8 judges, three are solid liberals, Kagan, Soto Major, and Breyer.
Two are conservative, Thomas, Kavanaugh. Three are closet liberals, Roberts, Gorsuch, and Alito

Depending on the case you will get 3 liberals, and up to 3 swing, or closet liberals. Roberts and the traitor Gorsuch can swing any "conservative" decision to a hard left decision by adding the 3 liberals to get you five or six votes.

The magnitude of Trump's decision in putting Gorsuch on the SCOTUS is only now starting to become clear. Roberts, well , IMHO, Epstein had something on him and that is that. Scalia was most likely murdered at the isolated ranch in Texas.

The RINOS will see Trump doesn't replace Ginsburg this year most likely. It will be 4 to 4 with two solid conservatives, two swing and three or 4 liberals which will be enough to get solid liberal decisions for years into the future. a lot of 4 to 4 decisions, but the democrats can live with that for a few more months.
Don't want to see that scenario, especially with the high chances there will be a repeat of BUSH V GORE (2000).
 

The Cub

Behold, I am coming soon.
‘President to put forth nominee in coming days’…

Posted by Kane on September 18, 2020 9:15 pm

CHECK OUT OUR HOMEPAGE -- CITIZEN FREE PRESS IS THE NEW DRUDGE, UPDATED 18 HOURS PER DAY!




‘President to put forth nominee in coming days’…




ABC NEWS: President to put forth nominee to replace Justice Ginsburg in coming days, per multiple sources.




McConnell: “President Trump’s nominee will receive a vote on the floor of the United States Senate.”

 

AlfaMan

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Article mostly tweets go to link to read them.


"F*** You Ruth Bader Ginsburg - F*** You for Not Retiring Under Obama!" - Leftists React to RBG's Death
ginsburg-impeachment.jpg

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died on on Friday night surrounded by family at home.
She was 87.
The left is not taking this well.
They are lashing out at RBG for not retiring during the Obama years!


Here’s an eff you for Hillary hater Susan Sarandon.

Mike Cernovich
called it…

Good God. I disliked this woman intensely. She stood for everything I stand against.

But to curse her for dying so a Republican president can put forth a new nominee is beyond childish. And cruel. She was dislikeable but she has kids and grandkids. They don't need the politics; they have to (at the end of the day) bury a loved one. If she had her choices, I'd lay even money she'd bet heavily on being on this side of the dirt rather than the other side.

Her death happened-don't wish ill on her; she's got enough baggage meeting Satan as it is. Dare I say show at least a little respect? If not for her, for her family's sake.

And there's a BIG crowd at the Supreme Court right now-Capitol police are ramping up to make sure it's peaceful and not another BLM burn loot and murder production.
 

Sub-Zero

Veteran Member
Part 2

"Amazingly," he recalled in a 1993 NPR interview, the government petitioned the United States Supreme Court, stating that the decision "cast a cloud of unconstitutionality" over literally hundreds of federal statutes, and it attached a list of those statutes, which it compiled with Defense Department computers.

Those laws, Marty Ginsburg added, "were the statutes that my wife then litigated ... to overturn over the next decade."
In 1971, she would write her first Supreme Court brief in the case of Reed v. Reed. Ginsburg represented Sally Reed, who thought she should be the executor of her son's estate instead of her ex-husband.

The constitutional issue was whether a state could automatically prefer men over women as executors of estates. The answer from the all-male supreme court: no.

It was the first time the court had ever struck down a state law because it discriminated based on gender.
And that was just the beginning.

ap120411123595_wide-5910f9126165cf78bce8466017fc59b9d3219834-s1600-c85.jpg


Ginsburg (left) joins the only three other women to sit on the U.S. Supreme Court — Sandra Day O'Connor, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan — in a celebration of O'Connor, the first woman justice, at the Newseum in Washington in 2012.

Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP
By then Ginsburg was earning quite a reputation. She would become the first female tenured professor at Columbia Law School, and she would found the Women's Rights Project at the ACLU.

As the chief architect of the battle for women's legal rights, Ginsburg devised a strategy that was characteristically cautious, precise and single-mindedly aimed at one goal: winning.

Knowing that she had to persuade male, establishment-oriented judges, she often picked male plaintiffs, and she liked Social Security cases because they illustrated how discrimination against women can harm men. For example, in Weinberger v. Wiesenfeld, she represented a man whose wife, the principal breadwinner, died in childbirth. The husband sought survivor's benefits to care for his child, but under the then-existing Social Security law, only widows, not widowers, were entitled to such benefits.

"This absolute exclusion, based on gender per se, operates to the disadvantage of female workers, their surviving spouses, and their children," Ginsburg told the justices at oral argument. The Supreme Court would ultimately agree, as it did in five of the six cases she argued.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Reflects On The #MeToo Movement: 'It's About Time' 'It's About Time'
LAW
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Reflects On The #MeToo Movement: 'It's About Time'

Over the ensuing years, Ginsburg would file dozens of briefs seeking to persuade the courts that the 14th Amendment guarantee of equal protection applies not just to racial and ethnic minorities, but to women as well.
In an interview with NPR, she explained the legal theory that she eventually sold to the Supreme Court.

"The words of the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause — 'nor shall any state deny to any person the equal protection of the laws.' Well that word, 'any person,' covers women as well as men. And the Supreme Court woke up to that reality in 1971," Ginsburg said.

During these pioneering years, Ginsburg would often work through the night as she had during law school. But by this time, she had two children, and she later liked to tell a story about the lesson she learned when her son, in grade school, seemed to have a proclivity for getting into trouble.

The scrapes were hardly major, and Ginsburg grew exasperated by demands from school administrators that she come in to discuss her son's alleged misbehavior. Finally, there came a day when she had had enough. "I had stayed up all night the night before, and I said to the principal, 'This child has two parents. Please alternate calls.'"

After that, she found, the calls were few and far between. It seemed, she said, that most infractions were not worth calling a busy husband about.

The Supreme Court's Second Woman
In 1980 then-President Jimmy Carter named Ginsburg to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. Over the next 13 years, she would amass a record as something of a centrist liberal, and in 1993 then-President Bill Clinton nominated her to the Supreme Court, the second woman appointed to the position.

She was not first on his list. For months Clinton flirted with other potential nominees, and some women's rights activists withheld their active support because they were worried about Ginsburg's views on abortion. She had been publicly critical of the legal reasoning in Roe v. Wade.
Justice Ginsburg Will Make Her Operatic Debut — Sort Of
POLITICS
Justice Ginsburg Will Make Her Operatic Debut — Sort Of

But in the background, Marty Ginsburg was lobbying hard for his wife. And finally Ruth Ginsburg was invited for a meeting with the president. As one White House official put it afterward, Clinton "fell for her--hook, line and sinker." So did the Senate. She was confirmed by a vote of 96 to 3.

Once on the court, Ginsburg was an example of a woman who defied stereotypes. Though she looked tiny and frail, she rode horses well into her 70s and even went parasailing. At home, it was her husband who was the chef, indeed a master chef, while the justice cheerfully acknowledged that she was an awful cook.

Though a liberal, she and the court's conservative icon, Antonin Scalia, now deceased, were the closest of friends. Indeed, an opera called Scalia/Ginsburg is based on their legal disagreements, and their affection for each other.
ap_457928818715_custom-62ca8d898700964e0d77438dc3d4418e61879b46-s1600-c85.jpg

Ginsburg speaks at the memorial service for Antonin Scalia, fellow Supreme Court justice and friend, at the Mayflower Hotel in Washington in March 2016.
Susan Walsh/AP

Over the years, as Ginsburg's place on the court grew in seniority, so did her role. In 2006, as the court veered right after the retirement of Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, Ginsburg dissented more often and more assertively, her most passionate dissents coming in women's rights cases.

Dissenting in Ledbetter v. Goodyear in 2007, she called on Congress to pass legislation that would override a court decision that drastically limited back-pay available for victims of employment discrimination. The resulting legislation was the first bill passed in 2009 after President Barack Obama took office.
Ginsburg And Scalia: 'Best Buddies''Best Buddies'
POLITICS

Ginsburg And Scalia: 'Best Buddies'

In 2014, she dissented fiercely from the court's decision in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, a decision that allowed some for-profit companies to refuse, on religious grounds, to comply with a federal mandate to cover birth control in health care plans. Such an exemption, she said, would "deny legions of women who do not hold their employers' beliefs, access to contraceptive coverage."

Where, she asked, "is the stopping point?" Suppose it offends an employer's religious belief "to pay the minimum wage" or "to accord women equal pay?"

And in 2013, when the court struck down a key provision of the Voting Rights Act, contending that times had changed and the law was no longer needed, Ginsburg dissented. She said that throwing out the provision "when it has worked and is continuing to work ... is like throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm because you are not getting wet."

She viewed her dissents as a chance to persuade a future court.

"Some of my favorite opinions are dissenting opinions," Ginsburg told NPR. "I will not live to see what becomes of them, but I remain hopeful."

And yet, Ginsburg still managed some unexpected victories by winning over one or two of the conservative justices in important cases. In 2015, for example, she authored the court's decision upholding independent redistricting commissions established by voter referenda as a way of removing some of the partisanship in drawing legislative district lines.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Undergoes Surgery For Lung Cancer
LAW
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Undergoes Surgery For Lung Cancer

Ginsburg always kept a backbreaking schedule of public appearances both at home and abroad, even after five bouts with cancer: colon cancer in 1999, pancreatic cancer 10 years later, lung cancer in 2018, and then pancreatic cancer again in 2019 and liver lesions in 2020. During that time, she endured chemotherapy, radiation, and in the last years of her life, terrible pain from shingles that never went away completely. All who knew her admired her grit. In 2009, three weeks after major cancer surgery, she surprised everyone when she showed up for the State of the Union address.

Shortly after that, she was back on the bench; it was her husband Marty who told her she could do it, even when she thought she could not, she told NPR.

A year later her psychological toughness was on full display when her beloved husband of 56 years was mortally ill. As she packed up his things at the hospital before taking him home to die, she found a note he had written to her. "My Dearest Ruth," it began, "You are the only person I have ever loved," setting aside children and family. "I have admired and loved you almost since the day we first met at Cornell....The time has come for me to ... take leave of life because the loss of quality simply overwhelms. I hope you will support where I come out, but I understand you may not. I will not love you a jot less."

Shortly after that, Marty Ginsburg died at home. The next day, his wife, the justice, was on the bench, reading an important opinion she had authored for the court. She was there, she said, because "Marty would have wanted it."

Years later, she would read the letter aloud in an NPR interview, and at the end, choke down the tears.

In the years after Marty's death, she would persevere without him, maintaining a jam-packed schedule when she was not on the bench or working on opinions.

Some liberals criticicized her for not retiring while Obama was president, but she was at the top of her game, enjoyed her work enormously, and feared that Republicans might not confirm a successor. She was an avid consumer of opera, literature, and modern art. But in the end, it was her work, she said, that sustained her.

"I do think that I was born under a very bright star," she said in an NPR interview. "Because if you think about my life, I get out of law school. I have top grades. No law firm in the city of New York will hire me. I end up teaching; it gave me time to devote to the movement for evening out the rights of women and men. "

And it was that legal crusade for women's rights that ultimately led to her appointment to the U.S. Supreme Court.
To the end of her tenure, she remained a special kind of feminist, both decorous and dogged.
Why are you posting these glorious tributes to her? She was an evil bitch and is currently burning in Hell and regretting her life choices.

And yeah, I'm judging her by her fruits. Get over it.
 

subnet

Boot
Correct.

I say get it done immediately.....put pressure on the Senators who are wobbly .......before the election.

Additionally, I expect that the SCOTUS may be needed in settling disputes re: the election. We can not count of Roberts. My guess is someone has something on him. [I still want to know who the John Roberts was on the Epstein airplane manefest.]
Straight up!!!!!
Give the Dems no quarter, they would do worse to us and plan to.
 

nebb

Veteran Member
F Laura Ingram.........gotta respect her (Ginsberg) even is you disagree with her .........no........evil is evil....f anyone that compromises
 

AlfaMan

Has No Life - Lives on TB
And Rosh Hashanah began at 7:13 p.m. in D.C. The woman was a good shot . . .

Interesting..................

Flags at the Supreme Court are now at half mast. Not sure who makes that determination, but they're down there at least.
No reports of any demonstration activity; there is a crowd there but looks to be thinning out a bit.
 

Doomer Doug

TB Fanatic
Sorry alfaman but she gets no pass from me. I will spit on her grave the same way ai would on mao ze tung s, or stalin's, or hitler's. She was an evil woman with the blood of Millions of babies on her hands.
In two months we will have an election that will end in blood on the streets and fat vultures. She was one pf the top enemies and traitors to me and what I believe in. These are hard times, alfaman, and just like that marxist bitch in portland doesn't care if I get killed being a Trump fascist, I don't care if they die and especially one of their key leaders bites the dust. F$/_& her and all her kind. The death has only begun.
 
Top