The bible verse means that there is virtually no supply at all. Therefore, there cannot be price discovery or a value assigned to anything. We're not there yet.A couple observations:
1.
If the shtf and you try to trade with me, I will value your "pre-1964 quarter" at exactly 25 cents! As will most people.
2.
19 They will fling their silver into the streets and their gold will become an abhorrent thing; their silver and their gold will not be able to deliver them in the day of the wrath of the Lord. They cannot satisfy their appetite nor can they fill their stomachs, for their iniquity has become an occasion of stumbling. Ezekiel 7:19
Read and attempt to understand the ramifications of this verse. This is a future event. Gold and Silver have never been worthless.
I have a teenager and a toddler.A lot depends on what you mean by "my kids".
IF they are truly children like less than 20, you can't eat PM's either. Meaning they are in the house with you most likely, and you will need to provide for you both. You can provide an uptick in provisions every week buy the stuff you eat, just get a couple of extra cans each week. If you're thinking about buying long term storage food, don't. At least not yet. Build a pantry, and stock for a year, rotate. You'd be surprise how fast that builds, and how much you will need.
If your "children" are over 20, it's their place to provide for themselves. Have a talk, explain, if they won't listen, it's on them. Not to be heartless, sure have some extra on hand. But total support could be out the window. They will need to grow up and understand what responsibility really is. My over 20 children are not going to live off of the money I work (or worked in my case) for. If they get in a bind, and need some temp help, everyone understands that, no problem, but to live off of, no way. Go find a bridge. That's not heartless, you're actually doing them more harm by letting them live off your income.
Lastly PM's preserve better than food, so in the long term, having PM's to pass on to them will be something they can use to trade for food. There will always be things you will have to buy, and in any down turn, PM's can get that for you.
I believe most people are looking at this wrong.
Dennis is correct; silver and gold are not an investment.
I will value your "pre-1964 quarter" at exactly 25 cents!
And we will NOT make a deal
(unless you value what you are selling at 1964 prices also)
The bible verse means that there is virtually no supply at all. Therefore, there cannot be price discovery or a value assigned to anything. We're not there yet.
I’d also be willing to trade labor and/or knowledge. Most farmers don’t need “stuff.”Why would I trade a chicken or a goat for a hunk of metal?
And us farmers can just wait for you to starve and take your shit. Why would I trade a chicken or a goat for a hunk of metal?
I’d also be willing to trade labor and/or knowledge. Most farmers don’t need “stuff.”
I guess what I'm struggling with is, do I sell some now while I can, in order to buy goods that may not be available later?
I have supplies. But my kids can't eat PMs. This is my dilemma.
You’ll find people hold vastly different opinions. Here’s mine:
I am not an “investor” in PMs. My little stash is specifically if things go sideways.
If things go sideways, you’ll be using PMs for barter, not payment per se. (“I need 200 rds of ammo.” “That will be 3 ounces of silver.”) If things go sideways, paper money would be worthless.
I consider silver to be for barter, and gold to be for “save your life” bribes.
Under no conditions would I consider PMs to be a “return on investment” vehicle. And people who do are looking at it wrong.
JMHO
That doesn’t seem to make any sense unless there’s some 29-style severe deflationary event. I’m guessing in a SHTF scenario, a pre-1964 quarter might buy a home on 10 acres with a productive well and fat farm animalsIf the shtf and you try to trade with me, I will value your "pre-1964 quarter" at exactly 25 cents! As will most people.
That doesn’t seem to make any sense unless there’s some 29-style severe deflationary event. I’m guessing in a SHTF scenario, a pre-1964 quarter might buy a home on 10 acres with a productive well and fat farm animals
I don't know if it will get "that" bad, but it might.That doesn’t seem to make any sense unless there’s some 29-style severe deflationary event. I’m guessing in a SHTF scenario, a pre-1964 quarter might buy a home on 10 acres with a productive well and fat farm animals
Why? What economic theory?The problem I'm pointing out is the average Jackwagon (me playing the ignorant Jackwagon) will not know the spot price of silver in a SHTF situation.
Naah! Wrong answer!!!
You really need to reread the verse. Silver and gold thrown into the street, does not mean there's a "shortage" of supply. Basic economic theory proves otherwise!
But continue reading.. It specifically says precious metals will NOT fill their stomachs...
And us farmers can just wait for you to starve and take your shit. Why would I trade a chicken or a goat for a hunk of metal?
If we were all sure that we could always buy or barter for all our needed supplies, there would never be a need to store those supplies, like food.The question I keep finding myself asking lately is, how will people barter with restrictions of movement?
Uhhhh... don't carry your cell phone on you so they can't track you. Make sure the other parties do the same.The question I keep finding myself asking lately is, how will people barter with restrictions of movement?
I like to play a game called, if I were the bad guys. If I were the bad guys, I would have people terrified to go out and interact with others (pandemic) AND I would lock down everyone, enforcing it through very tight monitoring. I would rig the 5g towers to have the ability to shut down comms in small selected areas, then swoop in and round up the troublemakers. I might even rig those towers to act like electric fence grids, to keep the "cattle" confined.
I know it sounds crazy. It scares me a little that my brain is even thinking these things.
Satellite technology has been able to track license plates since the 80s. Tracking technology is currently much more advanced, and that's just the tech we know about. I don't think there's any way we can evade it, though I'm open to ideas.Uhhhh... don't carry your cell phone on you so they can't track you. Make sure the other parties do the same.
You’ll find people hold vastly different opinions. Here’s mine:
I am not an “investor” in PMs. My little stash is specifically if things go sideways.
If things go sideways, you’ll be using PMs for barter, not payment per se. (“I need 200 rds of ammo.” “That will be 3 ounces of silver.”) If things go sideways, paper money would be worthless.
I consider silver to be for barter, and gold to be for “save your life” bribes.
Under no conditions would I consider PMs to be a “return on investment” vehicle. And people who do are looking at it wrong.
JMHO
I am fully agreed with you. Gold gets scammed with dealers. You pay premium going in, and you'll pay a premium coming out of PMs. Always some scam with trying to sell. Perfect example...call Apmex...looking to sell silver maple leafs. They give a lowball price. Call Provident and they give a higher price. Call Apmex back and Apmex says, "OH, yours is .9999 instead of just .999." That kind of crap. The scams and premiums don't end in the coin game. SO, in the end it's money to buy things like suits or beef cows. Not money to trade for dollars.That is the way I basically see it as well. A $20 gold coin in 1920 bought you a top notch business suit or beef cow and it will do the same today. It's the dollar that has tanked in the last 100 years. That being said things have a way of being undervalued and then overvalued as commodities do from time to time. The metals have been suppressed and are artificially undervalued right now and when the crunch comes I can see them reverse and shoot to being overvalued when the currency is worthless.
But that isn't why I have them hoping for the price to go up. And unfortunately most people that sell metal hawk them as an investment that goes up in value. That will probably happen but that isn't why you should have them. They are not a trade to make fiat off of. They are money plain and simple. If they go up in value then great but that isn't why I personally have them. I value mine in ounces in the safe and not in dollars.
Lets me sleep better at night. LOL!!
I went to BYU. I had professors in class tell us to start buying PMs when we could afford it. SO, I got married to another BYUer who had like minded profs there. My wife was on board that train. I bought my first gold coin when I was 22. I doubt you'd find such profs there these days. Back then, it was the old crowd of conservatives teaching.Which brings me to PM’s. The vast majority under 50(I’m 48 btw) have no concept of the value of PM’s. When and not if we go cashless and FRN’s have zero value their will be no reason for PM’s to retain value among individuals.
You're thinking about this from a "TS has not yet HTF" perspective. That skews your PoV. Anything, be it PMs, bullets, cigarettes, one's female children, etc, have exactly as much or as little intrinsic value as both parties bestow upon them. This is true for EVERY transaction in the world, every day, RIGHT NOW.Which brings me to PM’s. The vast majority under 50(I’m 48 btw) have no concept of the value of PM’s. When and not if we go cashless and FRN’s have zero value their will be no reason for PM’s to retain value among individuals.