[sex/corrupt] more scumbag pedophiles exposed...

alchemike

Veteran Member
imo, these crimes against children are the most serious threat that our so-called civilization faces right now...not weapons of mass destruction...

raping a child is a crime against humanity and humanity's future...

the wmd and fearful, psyoptical things of the like are used to distract us from the real obscene and horrific things happening in our own neighborhoods...our own schools...in the backs of our churches...

in the united states of america...

shameless pedophiles occupy positions of power in many of our institutions and go unpunished and uninvestigated...they are in fact 'installed' in many cases because they are easily blackmailed, manipulated and controlled...

they are scum...

and they are in government and law enforcement...in big biz...in education...in healthcare...religion - catholic and otherwise...

their names would surprise many...

they have their own organizations...blatant ones like nambla: north american man/boy love association...and less conspicuous fronts like the national coalition for sexual freedom...

but pedophilia is one of those things that people would mostly prefer not to talk about...it's just too difficult to handle or too uncomfortable or whatever...

meanwhile more children are hurt...hurt like you can't or don't want to imagine...

so do yourselves, your communities, your world and your children a favor...forget about the wmd for a while...we've all been prepared for them (as well as we can be) for quite some time...if you're not prepared by now, then why are you here reading this???

how about making sure there aren't scumbag pedophiles in your own neck of the woods???

this country needs to be cleaned up by the people, from the inside...not by a bunch of corrupt scumbags...

and we had better get to it while we still have some time...

o)<

mike

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

related posts:
http://www.timebomb2000.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=49674&highlight=mcgeorge
http://www.timebomb2000.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=49229&highlight=pedophile
http://www.timebomb2000.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=44594&highlight=pedophile

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

from email...

It's amazing how scarce Portuguese news is English-speaking sites, however today I found more info on the story reported a few days ago.

http://latelinenews.com/ll/english/1236460.shtml

I found what's on everyone's lips here, the tv's still going nonstop as this grows internationally, involving dipolmats, ambassadors and the doctors who treated the children and covered up. The story below is in Portuguese, and I couldn't even get it badly translated, but the case is being blasted wide open. Tapes of the boys were found in one of the doctor's homes and there have already been several arrests. The headline means "Shocking Images".

http://www.sic.pt/article9386visual4.html

What's worse, Saddam coming here, or this hideous pedophilia stuff that's still happening, a ring broken up recently here. There was a Brasilian priest sex scandal and who knows how many others. This is a sick world.

[LatelineNews: 2002-11-28] LISBON, Portugal - President Jorge Sampaio promised an exhaustive police investigation Wednesday into allegations of decades-long sexual abuse by staff at a state-run boys' home in Lisbon.
The child sex scandal has snowballed over the last five days since former students began alleging widespread abuse at the home since the late 1970s. Politicians have expressed concerns of a cover-up after claims that a former president, several ex-government members and senior police officers were told of the abuses 20 years ago but ignored them.

``The legal procedures which have to be set in motion will be set in motion. Investigations will be carried out and no stone will be left unturned,'' Sampaio said Wednesday.

More than 100 boys at the home suffered abuse, including alleged homosexual rape and pedophile prostitution, according to S.I.C. television channel.

An employee at the home, Carlos Silvino, was arrested earlier this week on suspicion of raping children in his care and organizing an alleged pedophile ring since the late 1970s. He was accused by a former student and a staff member at the home in an investigative report last weekend by S.I.C. television and weekly paper Expresso.

Parliament passed a unanimous vote condemning the alleged abuse, and the president of Parliament, Joao Mota Amaral, said he feared there had been ``a monstrous cover-up.''

A former secretary of state for families, Teresa Costa Macedo, said she first reported the alleged pedophile ring in 1980. But she said in media interviews, authorities failed to act.

Police said they could find no trace of her reports. On Tuesday, Costa Macedo handed police copies of the original reports drawn up in 1980 and 1982.

Costa Macedo also claimed that then-president Gen. Antonio Ramalho Eanes, head of state from 1976-86, and former social affairs minister Carlos Macedo, who was her superior, knew of the allegations but took no action.

Both men denied any knowledge of the case.

In a separate case, a mentally handicapped 17-year-old girl who allegedly was raped by an employee of another state-run home in Lisbon was reported to be recovering in hospital Wednesday, the national news agency Lusa reported.

Both homes involved in the allegations are governed by the Casa Pia, a state institution. Welfare Minister Antonio Bagao Felix said the Casa Pia's entire board of governors would be replaced in coming months. AP
 

Patrick

Membership Revoked
Michael...

.....In our eastern Ohio county, they began a new program in September, (with fed funds, mind you), that puts a deputy full-time on the net to pose as a fourteen year old girl or boy, or whatever a case that draws attention requires; they have since caught eight "uncle pervies" coming for a "date", if you will...

.....Now, don't get me wrong, as I feel strongly that a rapist, of any stripe, deserves <b>death</b>; but I do have concerns regarding entrapment... I have to wonder how many of these fools would have been so inclined, had there not been a saavy deputy online willing to open her cyberlegs for them... Entrapment used to be unallowed; now they call it a "sting" and the people yawn...
 
Last edited:

alchemike

Veteran Member
more...

i agree with you, patrick, regarding the 'sting' ops...but those are just low-level, fluff deals that simply do the job of pr...

law enforcement will go after a homeless pedophile and splash it all over the news...but the guys i want aren't homeless...they live in big houses...

for example, see below...

o)<

mike

http://www.sauduction.com/welcome.html
http://www.sauduction.com/12issue.html

ARABIAN PENINSULA AND THE INTERNATIONAL SEX SLAVE TRADE

The Arabian Peninsula inhabitants have long been involved in purchasing slaves. Up until recently, most of these slaves were purchased in Africa. With the advent of oil wealth the Saudi princes have been able to extend their slave purchases throughout the world. This has enabled the Saudi princes to become more selective and specialized in their tastes for slaves. The Saud family continue to be the prime purchasers on the international slave trade and are known as high end buyers. The Saudi Arabian Government continues to refuse to sign the United Nations treaties on slavery or other human rights issues because they do not want to be subject to their provisions. They will not sign extradition treaties even with Washington. They constantly declare they are free of slavery but will not allow international scrutiny. We will deal with the kidnaping of US male and female children by Saudi princes and their associates in this issue. We will substantiate the pattern of abuse using
documented occurrence where the princes and their associates have been caught.

STATE DEPARTMENT SENSITIVITIES TOWARDS THE SAUDI ARABIAN INTERNATIONAL SLAVE TRADE

It has been an open secret in Washington that the State Department has been extremely sensitive to criticism of its actions regarding Saud Arabia and its princes. There has been an unusual amount of personnel turnover at the Saudi Arabian desk where officials showing the slightest tendency towards ethics and morality are either transferred or terminated to make an example to others. Why the State Department sensitivity? There are things going on in Saudi Arabia which are so embarrassing to Washington that if the United States citizenry knew, their worst fears about Washington would be corroborated. We will deal with one of these sensitivities in this issue, child abduction by Saudi princes. This is one of several issues we have been reluctant to publish because of the emotional ramifications to families of children who have been abducted around the world in general and the United States in particular. We had to balance what the Saud princes involved in these abductions would do upon publication. In considering publishing this article against the potential benefits of making known their actions, we chose the latter. The humanitarian action would be for the Saudi Arabian Government to return the sex slaves to their US families so they could receive hospitalization and rehabilitation. We believe this will be considered impractical because of the numbers as well as the legal and political ramifications.

We have seen time and time again US media reported scandals when slaves of Saudi princes and their associates brought into the United States try to escape. The State Department then intervenes on behalf of the Saudi princes with diplomatic or retroactive diplomatic immunity. We initially became aware of non-parental child abductions by Saudi princes when a US citizen enslaved and tortured by King Fahd's nephews was told by a guard in their palace prison the last person to inhabit his cell was a "US girl child whore slave". We soon found the extensive nature of the non-parental abductions of US children by Saudi princes and their procurers.

MIDDLE EAST TIMES SPEAKS OUT ON SAUDI PRINCES SEX SLAVES

The Middle East Times reports: "There's no capability for reform, no strong character to stop the princes from corruption. You'd need someone to line tens of them up against the wall and shoot them, they're so used to spending this amount of money. You couldn't tell them -- you don't need 20 whores for the night, just one or two. Or you've got 20 dwarves in the palace, do you need to get two or three whores for every one? Someone like Prince Bishai Bin Abdel Aziz -- that's one real debauched individual. Try to stop him and he'll come and kill you." L105 The Saudi princes dehumanize child sex slaves obtained through their sex rings by demeaning them and calling them whores so as not to come into conflict with Saudi religious tenets.

US CHILD SEX SLAVES

There is a thriving industry of international child sex slavery within the United States. It has gone unabated for decades covered up by the assertiveness of Washington lobbyists representing the perpetrating countries, especially Saudi Arabia. Saudi princes are the high end buyers in the US child sex slave market and demand the best product. How does the US sex slave trade operate?

The National Center for Missing & Exploited children reports: "Child pornographers (and pimps), like other sex offenders, seek victims in places where youth gather: shopping malls, fast food establishments, nonalcoholic clubs, video game arcades, bus stations and through unethical
'modeling' agencies. The fact that juveniles are being recruited from the community both for pornography and prostitution is most disturbing ... runaways were spotted by pimps loitering in bus stations who approached the teenagers almost as they exited the buses. ... A primary method of
procuring a juvenile for prostitution is through the use of feigned friendship and love. ... They
(procurers) evaluated what the young woman needed, created the dependency, and then took advantage of that dependency. ... if a teenager was a runaway the pimp would find shelter for her ... Through practice, many child molesters have developed a real knack for spotting vulnerable victims."L106 This is a favored recruitment method commonly used by procurers to obtain children of both sexes for their own use or sale. Again, among the most prominent high end purchasers within the international child sex industry are Saudi princes. Saudi princes will also "special order"
children through a picture of the child in a media or give a description of a desired child. In these
cases the child is "snatched" from in front of their house, coming from school or at a store while with a parent. The child is in Saudi Arabia before the local police develop a search procedure.

The National Center for Missing & Exploited Children further reports; "pimps placed legitimate advertisements in newspapers and interviewed women for secretarial positions. They told female applicants that no job was available or that it had already been filled. They then attempted to date the applicants. With continued contact the pimp worked on the woman's weaknesses and tried to find out if she needed large sums of money. The pimps also placed advertisements for dancers, models or escort services. Showcasing was another technique in which applicants performed acts that were videotaped. While videotaping, the pimps tried to discover if the young women were interested in making large sums of money. They (procurers) wanted to be identified as mind controllers, experts in understanding the vulnerabilities and dependencies of women and men"L107 With quality product in hand, procurers will then send videos to Saudi princes in an attempt to sell the child. If the Saudi prince is interested he may ask that delivery be made near his plane in order to make a swift exit to Saudi Arabia.

KING FAHD'S SONS' LOS ANGELES SEX RING

King Fahd's sons' control their child sex ring from their Beverly Hills palaces. They learned from the Al-Fassi palace sex scandals in Beverly Hills during the 1980's and rent motels away from their palaces to conduct orgies with children procured for them. Around these motels they have a cordon of US security guards. An inner cordon is made up of the princes body guards, usually foreign. The younger the child the more desirable. These children are brought up through the sex ring channel to the point of purchase under the modeling or acting ruses of going to a shoot or set in Saudi Arabia. Upon purchase, children are then taken by limousine directly to the Saudi prince's plane at Los Angeles airport. As we mentioned in our prior newsletters, Washington allows Saudi princes and their entourage to circumvent customs and immigration which allows them to ship their child sex slaves out of the US without need of the customary passport. The children are then escorted directly onto the Saudi princes plane and flown to Saudi Arabia never to be seen again.

PRINCE JEFRI'S SEX SLAVES

These girls were brought to Brunei in a similar manner to that used by Saudi princes. Within the US a child is generally defined as someone that is under 17 years of age. We do not know if some of the girls in the above picture are under 17 years of age or their country of origin. This rare glimpse of the international sex trade sheds light on not only what goes on in Brunei but what goes on in Saudi Arabia. King Fahd's sons and other Saudi princes are directly involved in the international child sex industry as high end buyers. We see one of the usual enticements of a modeling job in a distant land. Life Magazine reports; "former Miss USA Shannon Marketic, in a recent lawsuit, claims she was imprisoned. She had gone there for what she believed was legitimate modeling work paying $3,000 per day ... she tried to leave and was forbidden." L108 In Miss USA's law suite she said upon arriving she was given a physical exam by a doctor ostensibly for country health regulations. Soon after, she was given clothes to wear for the evening. She said she was escorted to a room where she all of a sudden felt drowsy and fell asleep. She awoke to find her clothes rearranged upon her body, like somebody had removed them and then redressed her. We know from the Center for Missing and Abused Children that pedophiles keep photo/video libraries of their victims. It is reasonable to believe there are pictures/videos of Miss USA taken of her without her knowledge while unconscious. Even so, she was one of the lucky girls being high profile and whose parents knew of her whereabouts. Washington still denies the international child sex rings prey upon US children. US based child abduction organizations funded by Washington will not admit on the record to the international child sex rings preying upon US children for fear of loosing their funding. An old Washington maxim is: "He who controls the investigation wins." Miss USA lost her law suit because the State Department granted Immunity. The abducted children and their parents always lose out to foreign policy considerations of the politicians and their lobbyist associates who represent countries like Brunei and Saudi Arabia. When members of an international sex ring are caught Washington
allows them freedom from criminal and civil actions by either giving them diplomatic immunity,
retroactive diplomatic immunity or other State Department protection under the Foreign Sovereign
Immunity Act.

US MODEL DISAPPEARS

A new model comments: "At first I shared an apartment with two other models, one ... I forget what her name was, who was there for three weeks and then she was gone. Disappeared ... I know what I was getting myself into. I wasn't like the naive girl from Podunk that came in and got drugged at a
party and sold to the Arabs!"L109

ANOTHER MODEL DISAPPEARS

"Which one (international model) disappeared on a (film) shoot with a nonexistent Saudi Arabian
magazine, ending up who knows where?"L110 Middle East businessmen, and others get into the relatively small-time modeling game where most of the abuse occurs."L111 John Casablancas as
founder of Elite modeling was accused by Ilene Ford of Ford modeling of introducing models to;
"disgusting --- one day it was Arabs, the next day it was Jews from New York".L112

GULF PROCURERS

A runway agent at the New York international modeling agency Wilhelmina reports: "A lot of Arabs were storming Europe looking for beautiful young girls. A lot of girls made a lot of money not modeling"L113 It should be noted "Arabs" was a term used to connote Gulf citizens, especially
Saudi princes and unfairly construed towards all Arabs.

Dear Reader:

One should not think all Saudi princes participate in the international child sex trade industry. It is a small but apparent number. We do not have the intent to contribute to a mistaken stereotype that
causes both fear and disgust in the hearts of parents. Some of this fear is created for political reasons. We are attempting to sunlight this shadowy practices of child sex slavery so that parents of the world in general and the US in particular will be more cautious with their children. If we can save but one child from the clutches of these few Saudi princes, we will feel gratified. We also would like Washington to stop turning a blind eye and deaf ear to what some Saudi princes do in this country. We must stop Prince Bandar's Washington retainers from selling the human rights of US citizens to these Saudi princes.



Herb Mallard
National Press Club Member
Co-Chairman

"If I can do this to Americans I can do it to you. What chance do you think you have? I have power. I have connections." King Fahd's prior business partner publicly torturing Vietnam Veterans in front of other foreign workers.


AMERICANS AGAINST THE SAUDUCTION OF WASHINGTON
P.O. 3762
Arlington VA 22203
(703) 979-4236

e-mail: sauduction@sauduction.com

Go To Issue #13 http://www.sauduction.com/13issue.html
 

mbo

Membership Revoked
next steps

Just wait and see... the next steps are for the slow but 'progressive' de-stigmatizing of pedophilia. The left-wing wackos are slowly but surely manipulating the American psyche to be more 'accepting' of this 'diverse' lifestyle 'choice'.
 

craig bertok

Membership Revoked
Is the world getting sicker// or do "we" just know about it better?

Some things put me right in a mind to go see how H.D.Thoreau is doing down there in jail with all the others who follow their concience. When I see these "normal" "simple" people like Rudy Guliani's aid who used the city expense account to visit Thailand's sex holiday tours................I get this unpleasant urge.
______________________
"Is the world getting sicker or is the news just better at tellin' us"?
I'd say , now after seeing a good span of it......that
#a.The whole population of the world has always had pretty nearly the same inclination to "sin" against humanity.
Murder, rape, theft, and junk-mail will always exist.
I'm concerned I might be wrong as to the ways in which "sick" crimes are/aren't increasing. They could be increasing. Maybe in our society neighbors are more convenient to pull from a TV image, rather than to really have real neighbors in a community--we're all "so rushed" trying to keep up with the bills.

This would certainly bring out crimes. The sick ones can maybe hide in plain sight better. If you are a aid to the NYC mayor and want to go away and have sex with children, why they have freakin tours set up for you.
Even Vancouver, Canada is known as theplace to go to buy sexual-prostitution of children.
___________ It's not more news...............It's that our "tolerance" as a culture makes these crimes grow.
SaudiArabians can afford to hide if they want to. They can't do those things in their own country.

______________________

***************************************
 

alchemike

Veteran Member
more scum revealed...

it's too bad that the great majority of people in the united states have no idea how pervasive this sick shit is...just won't face it or just don't wanna...

but until we get it out in the open and expose all of these child killers (and they are killers, whether the children survive physically or not) the problems will become worse...

i know i must sound like a broken record, but this one topic is key to unravelling many of our nations woes...

and i just can't stand the thought of how many children in our country, not to mention around the world, are being brutally victimized right now...this very moment...

i honestly hope none of them are your kids...

o)<

mike

http://www.newsday.com/news/local/w...ec04,0,7612662.story?coll=ny-ap-regional-wire

Boston Archdiocese records show drug use, sex abuse by priests
By KEN MAGUIRE
Associated Press Writer

December 4, 2002, 8:45 AM EST

BOSTON -- Thousands of newly released personnel files show the Archdiocese of Boston went to great lengths to hide priests accused of abuse, including clergy who allegedly snorted cocaine and had sex with girls aspiring to be nuns.

One priest allegedly encouraged girls to "be brides of Christ" and described himself as "the second coming of Christ" to get them to engage in sexual acts, according to the records.

The first round of the documents _ roughly 3,000 pages on eight Roman Catholic priests _ were made public Tuesday on a Superior Court order. They had previously been obtained by victims' lawyers.

The records included allegations that clergy sexually abused teenage girls and used cocaine and other drugs, and that one led a "double life" by carrying on an affair with a female parishioner.

Many of the priests whose files were released are not among the 400 clergy members targeted in the dozens of lawsuits against the archdiocese. But attorneys for plaintiffs hope the documents show the archdiocese had a pattern of transferring priests to other parishes even after accusations of child abuse.

"There has been no other archdiocese where the extent of the problem has been so clearly identified," said David Clohessy, national director of Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests, or SNAP.

One of the eight priests, Robert M. Burns, had a history of sexual abuse before he came to Boston from the diocese in Youngstown, Ohio, the papers revealed. He was asked to serve in Boston in 1982 as he concluded a year of treatment for child molestation at a church facility.

Then-Cardinal Humberto S. Medeiros and at least two of his top aides _ Bishop Alfred C. Hughes and Thomas V. Daily of Brookyn _ knew of Burns' history, but still assigned him to a parish where he would have contact with children, the documents said.

The files also indicate that Cardinal Bernard F. Law, after establishing regulations in 1993 to deal with abusive priests, continued to assign accused priests to active duty.

"Some of the information contained in those documents is truly horrible," said archdiocese spokeswoman Donna M. Morrissey, who said she could not comment on the specific allegations. "We're committed to helping any and all survivors."

In the late 1960s, the Rev. Robert V. Meffan allegedly recruited girls to become nuns and then sexually abused them, according to 1993 letters from Sister Catherine E. Mulkerrin to her boss, the Rev. John B. McCormack, who was a top aide to Law. Meffan allegedly would counsel the girls to perform sexual acts as a way of progressing with their religious studies.

Meffan allegedly engaged in sexual acts with four girls in a Cape Cod rental, one of the girls told Mulkerrin, according to the 1993 memo.

According to the records, Meffan encouraged them to "be brides of Christ," and described himself as "the second coming of Christ." Meffan "did anything" but intercourse, one woman told church officials, because he said that was for "the afterlife."

On woman said Meffan "used to suggest to her that she imagine Christ touching, kissing, having intercourse with her," according to the church records.

"They were all young girls planning to be nuns," said attorney Roderick MacLeish Jr., who represents 247 plaintiffs suing the archdiocese.

Meffan told The Boston Globe the allegations in the documents were true, and that he still believed his sexual relationships with the teenage girls were "beautiful" and "spiritual," and were intended to bring them closer to God.

"What I was trying to show them is that Christ is human, and you should love him as a human being," said Meffan. "I felt that by having this little bit of intimacy with them that this is what it would be like with Christ."

The Rev. Thomas P. Forry allegedly built a house on Cape Cod for a woman with whom he carried on an 11-year affair, the documents showed. The woman had gone to him seeking advice because of problems in her marriage. The woman's son later alleged that Forry made sexual advances on him.

A 1992 memo from Mulkerrin to McCormack, currently the bishop in Manchester, N.H., outlined the history of allegations against Forry. Seven years later, Law reassigned Forry, then a prison chaplain, to a job as a roaming, fill-in priest to cover for priests on vacation. He is currently unassigned.

An unidentified man who answered the door at Forry's home in South Boston dismissed the abuse allegations.

Plaintiffs' attorneys and victims advocates say the documents show that Law continued to transfer problem priests until recently.

"It's not ancient history, it's very, very recent," Clohessy said.

The archdiocese earlier this year adopted a much tougher standard.

"We have a policy that no priest with a single credible allegation of abuse of a child will hold any position in the Archdiocese of Boston," Morrissey said. "It's a policy we wish we had for the past 50 years."

The Rev. Richard A. Buntel, who served in Malden, Mass., from 1978 to 1983, allegedly had sex with boys and used cocaine with them. Mulkerrin, in a memo to McCormack, said an alleged victim told her that Buntel provided him with cocaine when he was 15.

"He would snort it in the priest's room 'every time I went' and, in a way, it seemed like an exchange for sex which also happened every time," Mulkerrin wrote.

As of this year, Buntel was employed in a non-ministerial position at St. Thomas of Villanova parish in Wilmington. Phone messages left with the parish were not returned Tuesday night.


Copyright © 2002, The Associated Press
 

Donald Shimoda

In Absentia
This makes me sad...

Howdy, Folks.

<a href="http://www.thesmokinggun.com/mugshots/reubensmug1.html">Paul Rubens - aka "Pee-Wee Herman" - charged in November 2002 with misdemeanor possession of child pornography</a>.

Sigh.

Mr. Rubens turned himself in on this one.

Very, very sad; here was a guy that set up a delightful children's program {Pee-Wee's Playhouse} in the late 80's to early 90's.

What went wrong? :shk:

Or worse - is this why he did a children's show - so he could get "closer" to them? :eek:
 

Senses On

Inactive
mbo--

Many of the gay/lesbian organizations are openly advocating for “consensual” sex between adults and children, saying it's only wrong if it is “forced” on the child and that the child has a “right” to a full sex life. Not surprisingly, they are also advocating for “consensual” sex with animals, as long as the animal is not injured.

If that doesn't make you puke, nothing will.

I'm sure an internet search would yield plenty of documentation for my assertion. Of course, you'll also find stuff that will make you need a wastebasket the size of a battleship to handle the :kk2: .
 
Senses On

Could you please name those gay/lesbian groups?

The only group I know of is the Man/boy--and they are pedeophiles--most are married heterosexuals, if my memory is correct.

I have said repeatedly that sexual abuse of children is pandemic and certainly the true national sport of America.

I don't care how the hell they catch these @#$%ards.
 

alchemike

Veteran Member
i've decided to use this thread...

as my scumbag pedophile thread...

rather than posting new threads all the time, i'll just keep updating this one...

the header is vague enough to cover all of this information...

so...i have to rant for a minute...

regarding paul 'peewee' reubens, donald said...
Or worse - is this why he did a children's show - so he could get "closer" to them?
that is exactly why, i would imagine...

many people seem to think that those engaged in this kind of activity are easy to spot because no one 'normal' would be into 'that sort of thing'...any one of 'those people' would be easily identifiable...and it could never happen to my child because i would 'know it'...

it's not that people are 'stupid', it's just that most are not used to thinking the way the pedophile thinks...many don't consider these things thoroughly simply because the concepts are so foreign...

but therein lies a big part of the problem...these people, for the most part anyway, do not force the children to do these things...the talented ones are very difficult to i.d....many are smart, sly and crafty...the ultimate wolves dressed as sheep...

they do not harm the child...not at first, anyway...to the contrary, they become the child's best friend...they get close...buy them gifts...give them money...earn their trust...play upon the child's natural curiosities...tell them they are 'special' (which all of them are) and manipulate them...when they are confident that the formers have been accomplished, they then do the deeds...often times the kids don't even know something 'bad' is happening to them...

very few pedophiles just go grab kids off the street...they leave that to the cia...most of them are sneakier...they incorporate it into a seemingly 'normal' lifestyle...a double life...a mask...

this is one of the major reasons why pedophiles choose professions that will avail them to kids...the biggest threats are the ones that most people believe are the safest...teachers...priests...daycare...maybe the local skate rink manager...

people like this spend their entire adult lives hiding something that is absolutely heinous...so they naturally get very good at hiding it...

they are among the best of liars...

which leads to the next part of the problem...unfortunately, in our society the best liars are often quite successful...

but i've finally reached critical mass on this one...there is absolutely no greater priority in our country right now than this...nothing comes before the children...not iraq, not al qaeda and not the superbowl...

this stuff must end...

o)<

mike

ps...the following story is just another way to say the vatican isn't willing to pay for the abuses of their employees...imo the catholic church is one big corporation...and they've got plenty of dough at the corporate office...

what's that??? vatican having money problems??? i don't think so...maybe they should sell their art collection...or some of the ancient books and manuscripts that they keep sealed up all for themselves...http://www.sacredartcreations.org/collections_vatican.html

these brilliant religious 'scholars' and 'holy' men sit around in committees to 'determine policy' on pedophilia in the church...as if there were an unclear path...

these men have lost their way...

and until those who harm children are either healed, exposed or dead, we're gonna face the same problems...

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tm...0021205/ap_on_re_us/church_abuse_bankruptcy_8

capt.1039067930.church_abuse_bankruptcy_ny116.jpg

and guy's like this have got the balls to preach to people and ask for their money...as for me, i will never give to an organization unless i am confident i know where their money is going...that means keeping it local and being involved...

Boston Archdiocese OKs Bankruptcy Filing
Thu Dec 5,10:22 AM ET Add Top Stories - AP to My Yahoo!

By JUSTIN POPE (ed: how fitting), Associated Press Writer

BOSTON (AP) - The Boston Archdiocese, struggling to contend with a flurry of sex abuse lawsuits, has moved closer to a remedy usually associated with troubled businesses and people buried in debt: a bankruptcy filing.

A financial panel of the archdiocese gave Cardinal Bernard Law permission Wednesday to file for bankruptcy, a move that would give a secular court control over its finances and open it up to unprecedented scrutiny.


No Roman Catholic archdiocese in the United States has ever filed for bankruptcy, which requires approval from the Vatican (news - web sites).


The step toward bankruptcy troubled some lawyers of alleged abuse victims who are negotiating with the archdiocese toward possible settlements. Attorney Mitchell Garabedian said archdiocese leaders were bluffing in an attempt to gain leverage.


Roderick MacLeish Jr., whose law firm represents more than 200 alleged victims, said if the church does file for Chapter 11 protection, he wants the cardinal to "explain to a bankruptcy judge why he should be permitted to remain in his palatial residence while the victims of clerical sexual abuse lie wounded."


The archdiocese has been at the center of the abuse scandal that has engulfed the U.S. church since January. It is negotiating with attorneys for some 400 alleged victims.


"We believe a mediated resolution would be preferable to seeking Chapter 11 protection and remain hopeful that this process currently under way will be successful," archdiocese spokeswoman Donna Morrissey said.


"However, we feel it is also necessary to carefully consider the alternative or complementary approach of a Chapter 11 reorganization."


Morrissey said she did not know when Law will make a decision.


A bankruptcy filing would put litigation against the archdiocese on hold. It could also help the archdiocese get a better handle on what it will owe alleged victims, which could in turn assuage donors who have yanked support from the church because of the abuse scandal.


But it would transfer financial control of church assets to a bankruptcy judge.

The decision by the archdiocese's Finance Committee came one day after hundreds of pages of archdiocese personnel files were released concerning priests facing allegations of sexual abuse, drug use and other misconduct.

Many of the priests involved are not targeted in the lawsuits. However, the plaintiffs' attorneys hope the documents show a pattern of transferring priests to other parishes even after accusations of child abuse.

Earlier this year, the finance council rejected a proposed settlement worth up to $30 million for 86 victims of defrocked priest John Geoghan. Garabedian was forced to renegotiate and the two sides agreed on a $10 million settlement.

No U.S. diocese is known to have filed for bankruptcy, though dioceses in Dallas and Santa Fe, N.M., were brought to the brink in the 1990s. Dallas reached a $30 million settlement in the case of pedophile and former priest Rudy Kos. And Santa Fe church officials had to borrow from parish savings accounts to pay more than $50 million to settle 40 abuse cases.

Separately, Morrissey confirmed that the archdiocese has barred church agencies from meeting at the parish of the Rev. Walter Cuenin, a frequent critic of Law, The Boston Globe reported Thursday.

The order, in an e-mail Tuesday, came after Cuenin invited more than 100 colleagues to meet Friday at his Newton parish to discuss concerns about the archdiocese's plans to continue a fund-raising drive amid bankruptcy talk and the abuse scandal, the Globe reported. The e-mail said Law made his decision because of "some past issues, as well as current issues now being addressed."

Cuenin occasionally has been summoned to the archdiocese for comments that were perceived as too liberal, including support for same-sex marriage. He also is a leader of the Boston Priests Forum, which has advocated due process for priests accused of molestation.
 

alchemike

Veteran Member
arghhh...

frustrating to catch 'em but not stop 'em...

o)<

mike

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A20640-2002Dec6.html

Internet Sex Sting Ends With Mistrial
Jury Deadlocks in Navy Physicist's Case

By Allan Lengel
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, December 7, 2002; Page B01


BALTIMORE, Dec. 6 -- A federal jury said it was deadlocked tonight in the case of a Navy physicist accused of using the Internet to solicit sex from a minor, leading to a mistrial and a rare setback for an FBI unit that targets suspected sexual predators through online stings.

The jury of nine men and three women said it was unable to reach a decision after 11 hours of deliberations. The physicist, George P. Chambers, was the first person to contest charges, brought by the Maryland-based FBI unit in U.S. District Court here, subjecting himself to often sordid testimony about sexually explicit e-mails. Since 1995, more than 50 defendants have pleaded guilty to charges in similar cases brought by the unit.

The jury reported that it was split 9 to 3 in favor of conviction. Judge Andre M. Davis then declared a mistrial.

Chambers, 45, of La Plata became the target of an FBI sting after striking up an e-mail correspondence with an undercover agent posing as a 13-year-old cheerleader. He was arrested June 6 at the Mall in Columbia, where prosecutors said he intended to rendezvous with his e-mail partner for sex. He denied any wrongdoing.

The case hinged upon two issues: whether Chambers believed he was corresponding with a 13-year-old and whether he intended to have sex with her.

In testimony Wednesday, Chambers told the jury that he was simply acting out a fantasy in cyberspace and that he thought all along the purported cheerleader was an adult or even a member of law enforcement who was role-playing.

Chambers, a married father of two preschool daughters, is on unpaid leave from his job as a weapons designer at the Naval Surface Warfare Center. He declined comment last night, and prosecutors declined to say whether they will retry him.

The three-day trial provided a public look at the methods of Operation Innocent Images, an FBI initiative launched in 1995 to thwart people who engage in online child pornography or child sex exploitation. Agents pose as teenagers in online chat rooms, where graphic conversations take place, in hopes of identifying sexual predators.

Chambers and his attorney, Bryan A. Levitt, focused on Chambers's state of mind.

On the witness stand, Chambers acknowledged that he sent the sexually explicit messages and photographs that prosecutors introduced as evidence. Attempting to explain this conduct, Levitt told the jury in closing arguments that Chambers was a "nice guy with a crazy twist" who used the Internet to fulfill fantasies. Chambers testified that he went to the mall out of curiosity, with no intention of having a sexual encounter.

Keith Floyd, a juror who voted for conviction, said he was disappointed that "a bad person" remains on the street.

But Sarah Shifflet, the jury forewoman, said she voted for acquittal because "I don't necessarily believe that he intended to meet this person, whoever it was, for sex."

The FBI's Baltimore office launched Operation Innocent Images as an offshoot of the investigation of the 1993 disappearance of George "Junior" Burdynski, a 10-year-old Prince George's County boy, who has not been found. That case led authorities to two pedophiles who sent electronic messages soliciting sex from boys. That prompted the FBI to take a much closer look at activities on the Internet.

The operation has expanded to 23 other FBI offices nationwide, with the Baltimore office maintaining a central file of information gathered across the nation. Roughly 2,200 people have been convicted nationwide in the probes.

The number of investigations launched nationwide has grown from 113 in the program's first year of operation to 2,370 in fiscal 2002.

"The problem is worsening -- it's not getting better," said Peter F. Brust, assistant special agent in charge of the FBI field office in Baltimore.

In the Baltimore-Washington area, an FBI task force has about two dozen agents and analysts based at an FBI branch in Calverton, using an office building off Interstate 95. The team also conducts training sessions for law enforcement authorities stationed around the world -- teaching them, among many things, how to sound like a teenager online.

The agents work in a secluded room filled with cubicles and computers, posing as teenage boys or girls, waiting to be approached by adults interested in passing on child pornography or meeting for sex. To avoid concerns about entrapment, they are trained not to take the first step. But they go along with the sexual chatter.

The Chambers case followed a typical investigative pattern. At her workstation in Calverton, agent Emily Vacher was in America Online's "I Love Older Men" chat room shortly after 4 p.m. Feb. 1, posing as a 13-year-old cheerleader from Columbia.

In short time, Vacher testified in court, Chambers sent her an instant message and wrote: "are you a cheerleader?" and "do you like older guys." He sent a 10-year-old photo of himself and graphic photos.

Over the next four months, he talked of getting together. He also pushed to talk to her by phone, but she declined. On March 24, he asked whether she worked for the FBI. She replied: "since when does the FBI hire teenagers?" He asked a second time that day if she worked for any law enforcement agency. "Uummmmm no," she replied.

Vacher sent him a photograph April 10: a picture of herself at age 13. Chambers responded, "you are really hot looking."

On May 21, Chambers again voiced suspicions, asking, "Are you a police officer or do you work for any law enforcement agency?"

"No," she responded. "I'm in the 9th grade."

"good, thankyou . . . lots of cops online pretending to be girls."

Vacher typed back: "they don't let 9th graders in the CIA!!!!!"

During the trial, Levitt did not challenge the legality of Vacher going undercover. Authorities explained that FBI agents and police can misrepresent themselves during undercover investigations on the street or in cyberspace.

The June 6 meeting was set up outside a bakery on the mall's second floor.

Investigators then followed Chambers to the mall from his workplace at the Naval Surface Warfare Center in Indian Head, a 60-mile drive, and arrested him outside the bakeshop. Chambers contended that he was walking away when he was apprehended and told the jury that he could not believe he could be arrested for walking at a shopping mall. But the prosecution said he appeared to be milling around, waiting.
 

alchemike

Veteran Member
more on pedophile rings...

info out there people...just need to recognize it and put an end to it...in our own personal worlds...

o)<

mike

http://www.tarpley.net/bush21.htm

George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography --- by Webster G. Tarpley & Anton Chaitkin
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Chapter -XXI- Omaha

On the morning of June 29, 1989, pandemonium erupted in the corridors of power in the nation's capital. ``Homosexual Prostitution Probe Ensnares Official of Bush, Reagan,'' screamed the front-page headline of the Washington Times with the kicker ``Call Boys Took Midnight Tour of White House.''

The Times reported, ``A homosexual prostitution ring is under investigation by federal and District authorities and includes among its clients key officials of the Reagan and Bush administrations, military officers, congressional aides and U.S. and foreign businessmen with close ties to Washington's political elite.''

The exposeé centered on the role of one Craig Spence, a Republican powerbroker known for his lavish ``power cocktail'' parties. Spence was well connected. He celebrated Independence Day 1988 by conducting a midnight tour of the White House in the company of two teenage male prostitutes among others in his party.

Rumors circulated that a list existed of some 200 Washington prominents who had used the call boy service. The Number Two in charge of personnel affairs at the White House, who was responsible for filling all the top civil service posts in the federal bureaucracy, and Secretary of Labor Elizabeth Dole's chief of staff, were two individuals publicly identified as patrons of the call boy ring.

Two of the ring's call boys were allegedly KGB operatives, according to a retired general from the Defense Intelligence Agency interviewed by the press. But the evidence seemed to point to a CIA sexual blackmail operation, instead. Spence's entire mansion was covered with hidden microphones, two-way mirrors and video cameras, ever ready to capture the indiscretions of Washington's high, mighty and perverse. The political criteria for proper sexual comportment had long been established in Washington: Any kinkiness goes, so long as you don't get caught. The popular proverb was that the only way a politician could hurt his career was if he were ``caught with a dead woman or a live boy'' in his bed.

Months after the scandal had died down, and a few weeks before he allegedly committed suicide, Spence was asked who had given him the ``key'' to the White House. The Washington Times reported that ``Mr. Spence hinted the tours were arranged by `top level' persons, including Donald Gregg, national security advisor to Vice President Bush''@s1 and later U.S. ambassador to South Korea.

We have already had occasion to examine Don Gregg's role in Iran-Contra, and have observed his curious performance when testifying under oath before congressional committees. Gregg indignantly denied any connection to Spence, yet it is public record that Spence had sponsored a dinner in Gregg's honor in the spring of 1989 at Washington's posh Four Seasons Hotel in Georgetown.

George Bush was less than pleased with the media coverage of the prostitution charges and kept abreast of the scandal as it mushroomed. The Washington Times reported in an article titled ``White House Mute on Call Boy Scandal,'' that ``White House sources confirmed that President Bush has followed the story of the late night visit and Mr. Spence's links to a homosexual prostitution ring under investigation by federal authorities since they were disclosed June 29 in the Washington Times. But top officials will not discuss the story's substance, reportedly even among themselves.

``Press officers have rebuffed repeated requests to obtain Mr. Bush's reaction and decline to discuss investigations or fall out from the disclosures.''@s2 By midsummer, the scandal had been buried. The President had managed to avoid giving a single press conference where he would surely have been asked to comment.

As the call boy ring affair dominated the cocktail gossip circuit in Washington, another scandal, halfway across the country in the state of Nebraska, peaked. Again this scandal knocked on the President's door.

A black Republican who had been a leader in organizing minority support for the President's 1988 campaign and who proudly displayed a photo of himself and the President, arm in arm, in his Omaha home, was at the center of a sex and money scandal that continues to rock the Cornhusker state.

The scandal originated with the collapse of the minority-oriented Franklin Community Credit Union in Omaha, directed by Lawrence E. King, Jr., a nationally influential black Republican who sang the national anthem at both the 1984 and 1988 Republican conventions. King became the subject of the Nebraska Senate's investigation conducted by the specially created ``Franklin Committee'' to probe charges of embezzlement. In November 1988, King's offices were raided by the FBI and $40 million was discovered missing. Within weeks, the Nebraska Senate, which initially opened the inquiry to find out where the money had gone, instead found itself questioning young adults and teenagers who said that they had been child prostitutes. Social workers and state child-care administrators accused King of running a child prostitution ring. The charges grew with the former police chief of Omaha, the publisher of the state's largest daily newspaper, and several other political associates of King, finding themselves accused of patronizing the child prostitution ring.

King is now serving a 15-year federal prison sentence for defrauding the Omaha-based credit union. But the magazines Avvenimenti of Italy and Pronto of Spain, among others, have charged that King's crimes were more serious: that he ran a national child prostitution ring that serviced the political and business elite of both Republican and Democratic parties. Child victims of King's operations charged him with participation in at least one satanic ritual murder of a child several years ago. The Washington Post, New York Times, Village Voice and National Law Journal covered the full range of accusations after the story broke in November of 1988. King's money machinations were also linked to the Iran-Contra affair, and some say that King provided the CIA with information garnered from his alleged activities as a ``pimp'' for the high and mighty.

Pronto, the Barcelona-based, largest circulation weekly in Spain with 4.5 million readers, reported that the Lawrence E. King child prostitution scandal ``appears to directly implicate politicos of the state of Nebraska and Washington, D.C. who are very close to the White House and George Bush himself.''

The weekly stated that Roy Stephens, a private investigator who has worked on the case and heads the Missing Youth Foundation, ``says there is reason to believe that the CIA is directly implicated,'' and that the ``FBI refuses to help in the investigation and has sabotaged any efforts'' to get to the bottom of the story. Stephens says that ``Paul Bonnacci directly accused President Bush of being implicated'' in the affair when he testified before the Franklin Committee.@s3 Bonnacci, who had been one of the child prostitutes, is identified by leading child-abuse experts as a well-informed, credible witness.

Lawrence King was no stranger to President Bush. And Lawrence King was no stranger to Craig Spence. Several of the Omaha child prostitutes testified that they had traveled to Washington, D.C. with King in private planes to attend political events which were followed by sex parties. King and Spence had much in common. Not only were they both Republican Party activists but they had gone into business together procuring prostitutes for Washington's elite.

Bush's name had repeatedly surfaced in the Nebraska scandal. But his name was first put into print in July 1989, a little less than a month after the Washington call boy affair had first made headlines. Omaha's leading daily newspaper reported, ``One child, who has been under psychiatric care, is said to believe she saw George Bush at one of King's parties.''@s4

A full three years after the scandal had first made headlines, Bush's name again appeared in print. Gentleman's Quarterly (GQ) carried a lengthy article, viewed by many political observers in Nebraska as an attempt to refute the charges which would not die, despite the termination of all official inquiries. The GQ piece disputed the allegations as a conspiracy theory that went out of control and resonated because of some mystical sociological phenomena allegedly unique to Nebraskan rural folk who will believe anything and burn ``with the mistrust of city life that once inflamed the prairie with populist passion.'' Numerous polls over the last few years have recorded over 90% saying they believe there has been a ``cover up'' of the truth.

GQ reported that yes, there was theft, corruption and homosexuality in this story, ``but no children were ever involved in this case.'' In fact, ``the only child even mentioned was a 9-year-old boy, whom the least reliable of Caradori's witnesses claimed to have seen in the company of George Bush at one of Larry King's Washington parties.''

Gary Caradori was a retired state police investigator who had been hired by the Nebraska Senate to investigate the case, and who had died mysteriously during the course of his investigations.@s5

Sound crazy? Not to Steve Bowman, an Omaha businessman who is compiling a book about the Franklin money and sex scandal. ``We do have some credible witnesses who say that `Yes, George Bush does have a problem.'... Child abuse has become one of the epidemics of the 1990s,'' Bowman told GQ. Allegedly, one of Bowman's sources is a retired psychiatrist who worked for the CIA. He added that cocaine trafficking and political corruption were the other principal themes of his book.@s6

It didn't sound crazy to Peter Sawyer either. An Australian conservative activist who publishes a controversial newsletter, Inside News, with a circulation of 200,000, dedicated his November 1991 issue entirely to the Nebraska scandal, focusing on President Bush's links to the affair. In a section captioned, ``The Original Allegations: Bush First Named in 1985,'' Sawyer writes,

"Stories about child sex and pornography first became public knowledge in 1989, following the collapse of the Franklin Credit Union. That is not when the allegations started, however. Indeed, given the political flavor of the subsequent investigations, it would be easy to dismiss claims that George Bush had been involved. He was by then a very public figure...."

If the first allegations about a massive child exploitation ring, centered around Larry King and leading all the way to the White House, had been made in 1989, and had all come from the same source, some shenanigans and mischievous collusion could be suspected. However, the allegations arising out of the Franklin Credit Union collapse were not the first.

Way back in 1985, a young girl, Eulice (Lisa) Washington, was the center of an investigation by Andrea L. Carener, of the Nebraska Department of Social Services. The investigation was instigated because Lisa and her sister Tracey continually ran away from their foster parents, Jarrett and Barbara Webb. Initially reluctant to disclose information for fear of being further punished, the two girls eventually recounted a remarkable story, later backed up by other children who had been fostered out to the Webb's [sic].

These debriefings were conducted by Mrs. Julie Walters, another welfare officer, who worked for Boys Town at the time, and who had been called in because of the constant reference by the Webb children and others, to that institution.

Lisa, supported by her sister, detailed a massive child sex, homosexual, and pornography industry, run in Nebraska by Larry King. She described how she was regularly taken to Washington by plane, with other youths, to attend parties hosted by King and involving many prominent people, including businessmen and politicians. Lisa specifically named George Bush as being in attendance on at least two separate occasions. ``Remember, this was in 1985,'' emphasized the Australian newsletter.

The newsletter reproduces several documents on Lisa's case, including a Nebraska State Police report, a State of Nebraska Foster Care Review Board letter to the Attorney General, an investigative report prepared for the Franklin Committee of the Nebraska Senate, and a portion of the handwritten debriefing by Mrs. Julie Walters. Peter Sawyer says that he obtained the documents from sympathetic Australian law enforcement officers who had helped Australian Channel Ten produce an exposeé of a national child prostitution ring Down Under. The Australian cops seem to have been in communication with American law enforcement officers who apparently agreed that there had been a coverup on the Nebraska scandal. Subsequent investigations by the authors established that all four documents were authentic.

Mrs. Julie Walters, now a housewife in the Midwest, confirmed that in 1986 she had interviewed the alleged child prostitute, Lisa, who told her about Mr. Bush. Lisa and her sister Tracey were temporarily living at the time in the home of Kathleen Sorenson, another foster parent. Mrs. Walters explained that at first she was very surprised. But Lisa, who came from a very underprivileged background with no knowledge of political affairs, gave minute details of her attendance at political meetings around the country.

From Julie Walters' 50-page handwritten report:

3/25/86. Met with Kathleen [Sorenson] and Lisa for about 2 hours in Blair [Neb.] questioning Lisa for more details about sexual abuse.... Lisa admitted to being used as a prostitute by Larry King when she was on trips with his family. She started going on trips when she was in 10th grade. Besides herself and Larry there was also Mrs. King, their son, Prince, and 2-3 other couples. They traveled in Larry's private plane, Lisa said that at these trip parties, which Larry hosted, she sat naked ``looking pretty and innocent'' and guests could engage in any sexual activity they wanted (but penetration was not allowed) with her.... Lisa said she first met V.P. George Bush at the Republican Convention (that Larry King sang the national anthem at) and saw him again at a Washington, D.C. party that Larry hosted. At that party, Lisa saw no women (``make-up was perfect--you had to check their legs to make sure they weren't a woman'').

The polygraph test which Lisa took only centered around sexual abuse committed by Jarrett Webb. At that time, she had said only general things about Larry's trips (i.e. where they went, etc.). She only began talking about her involvement in prostitution during those trips on 3/25/86....

Lisa also accompanied Mr. and Mrs. King and Prince on trips to Chicago, N.Y. and Washington, D.C. beginning when she was 15 years old. She missed twenty-two days of school almost totally due to these trips. Lisa was taken along on the pretense of being Prince's babysitter. Last year she met V.P. George Bush and saw him again at one of the parties Larry gave while on a Washington, D.C. trip. At some of the parties there are just men (as was the case at the party George Bush attended)--older men and younger men in their early twenties. Lisa said she has seen sodomy committed at those parties....

At these parties, Lisa said every guest had a bodyguard and she saw some of the men wearing guns. All guests had to produce a card which was run through a machine to verify who the guest was, in fact, who they said they were. And then each guest was frisked down before entering the party.@s7

The details of the accusations against Mr. Bush are known to be in the hands of the FBI. A Franklin Committee report stated:

Apparently she [Lisa] was contacted on December 19 [1988] and voluntarily came to the FBI offices on December 30, 1988. She was interviewed by Brady, Tucker and Phillips.

She indicates that in September or October 1984, when [Lisa] Washington was fourteen or fifteen years of age, she went on a trip to Chicago with Larry King and fifteen to twenty boys from Omaha. She flew to Chicago on a private plane.

The plane was large and had rows of two seats apiece on either side of the interior middle aisle.

She indicates that King got the boys from Boys Town and the boys worked for him. She stated that Rod Evans and two other boys with the last name of Evans were on the plane. Could not recall the names of the other boys.

The boys who flew to Chicago with Washington and King were between the ages of fifteen and eighteen. Most of the boys were black but some were white. She was shown a color photograph of a boy and identified that boy as being one of the boys on the plane. She could not recall his name.

She indicates that she was coerced to going on the trip by Barbara Webb.

She indicates that she attended a party in Chicago with King and the male youths. She indicated George Bush was present.

She indicates that she set [sic] at a table at the party while wearing nothing but a negligee. She stated that George Bush saw her on the table. She stated she saw George Bush pay King money, and that Bush left the party with a nineteen year old black boy named Brent. Lisa said the party George Bush attended was in Chicago in September or October 1984. According to the Chicago Tribune of October 31, 1984, Bush was in Illinois campaigning for congressional candidates at the end of October.

Lisa added more details on the Chicago trip, and told why she was sure it was George Bush she had seen. According to a May 8, 1989 report by investigator Jerry Lowe, ``Eulice [Lisa] indicated that she recognized George Bush as coming to the party and that Bush had two large white males with him. Eulice indicated Bush came to the party approximately 45 minutes after it started and that he was greeted by Larry King. Eulice indicated that she knew George Bush due to the fact that he had been in political campaigns and also she had observed a picture of Bush with Larry King at Larry King's house in Omaha.''

There is no question that Lisa and Tracey Webb were abused in the way they claimed. But, in keeping with the alleged pattern of coverup, a Washington County, Nebraska judge in December 1990 dismissed all charges against their abusers, Jarrett and Barbara Webb. The judge ignored presented testimony of the 1986 report by Boys Town official Julie Walters. The report stated: ``Lisa was given four polygraph tests administered by a state trooper at the State Patrol office on Center Street in Omaha. The state trooper, after Lisa's testing was completed, told [another foster parent] he tried to `break Lisa down,' but he was convinced she was telling the truth.''@s8

Furthermore, numbers of foster care officials and youth workers debriefed the sisters. All of them fully believed not only their general story of abuse, but specifically their account of Bush's involvement. The March 1986 report on Bush was incorporated into the Foster Care Review Board's official report presented to the Senate Franklin Committee and to law enforcement. As Kathleen Sorenson wrote in a report dated May 1, 1989, ``This was long before he [Bush] was president. It seems like there were more exciting people to `lie' about if that's what they were doing.''@s9

The rumors about Mr. Bush were given new life when Dr. Ronald Roskens, the head of the Agency for International Development (AID), found himself the object of controversy. Executive Intelligence Review reported in the fall of 1991 that Dr. Roskens is the subject of a scandal in which he is being charged with violating federal laws and ethics codes, according to the Oct. 6 Washington Post. A report prepared by AID Inspector General Herbert Beckington, dated April 5 and leaked to the Post, charges Roskens with accepting thousands of dollars in payments from ``different organizations in compensation of his and his wife's travel expenses'' while Roskens was on official government travel. He also took money for a private trip from a company ``from which Roskens had agreed to divest himself as a condition of his presidential appointment.''

The inspector general concluded that the money accepted by Roskens was a clear conflict of interest and violated federal law against earning non-government income. But on Sept. 4, after reviewing the charges, the Department of Justice ... informed Beckington that it had decided not to prosecute--giving no explanation for its decision. The White House is reviewing the case.

Congressional investigators are already looking into the allegations. Should they scratch below the surface, they will find that this is not the first time Roskens has been touched by scandal. Although President Bush promised that he would not tolerate even the appearance of impropriety in his administration, Congress should not be surprised if the White House threatens to start ``breaking legs'' in Roskens's defense.

It is not just that Roskens is a personal friend of the President--although he is.... [A]n unimpeded investigation into Roskens could expose the link between Bush's little publicized birth control mania--much of which is carried out through the State Department's AID in the Third World--and the sexual depravity rampant in U.S. political and intelligence elites. Any such scandal could shatter the illusions of Bush's conservative base, many of whom still accept the President's claims to being ``pro-life,'' ``anti-drug,'' and an American patriot. It should also make anyone who thinks of the propaganda about Bush being the ``education President,'' deeply queasy.

Roskens left his home state of Nebraska for the nation's capital in early 1990 enmired in controversy. He had been fired suddenly as president of the University of Nebraska, in a secret meeting of the state Board of Regents in July 1989. No public explanation was given for his removal. Yet, within weeks, the White House offered Roskens the high-profile job in Washington. The administration knew about the controversy in Nebraska, but Roskens passed an FBI background check, and was confirmed to head AID.

The FBI appears to have overlooked a Feb. 19, 1990 investigative report by the late Gary Caradori [see footnote 5 below], an investigator for the ``Franklin Committee'' of the Nebraska Senate. He wrote, ``I was informed that Roskins [sic] was terminated by the state because of sexual activities reported to the Regents and verified by them. Mr. Roskins [sic] was reported to have had young men at his residence for sexual encounters. As part of the separation from the state, he had to move out of the state-owned house because of the liability to the state if some of his sexual behavior was `illegal.'''@s1@s0

There has been no independent confirmation of the accusation. As of late December 1991, a congressional committee was looking into the charges.
 

Lee P. Lapin

Inactive
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3887c3d420c5.htm

FreeRepublic.com "A Conservative News Forum"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ Last | Latest Posts | Latest Articles | Self Search | Add Bookmark | Post | Abuse | Help! ]


Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.


DeCamp Comments on "The Franklin CoverUp"

Crime/Corruption News Keywords: FRANKLIN, PEDOPHILIA
Source: Various Listed
Published: unk. Author: John DeCamp
<b>Posted on 01/20/2000</b> 18:26:28 PST by NDCORUP

This is excerpted from the replies on this thread --- King drops appeal of $1 million judgment . This goes further into the massive corruption at the highest level of our government, thru both parties. Don't read it if your mind is closed to the truth or you are so loyal to "PARTY" that it'll just raise your BP.

INTRODUCTION

It is a little over four years since I, John DeCamp, wrote the words you have just read. My closest friend and mentor, Bill Colby, like so many others in the Franklin case, is dead; he was fished out of a river in front of his home, under the most questionable of circumstances, in April 1996. Was he killed because of his involvement in Franklin? I don't know. What I do know, is that Bill Colby was the heart and soul of the Franklin investigation. Although at a certain point he warned me against investigating the case further, it was he who relentlessly pushed to publicly expose what had already been discovered, when everyone else, including, at times, myself, wanted to call it quits. Without him, this book would never have been written. In the new, final chapter of this second edition, I tell much more about my relationship to Bill Colby, who was, in my estimation, one of the greatest patriots this country has seen, from the time that he served as our country's Deputy Ambassador to South Vietnam (but, in reality, as CIA Station Chief), and recruited a young combat infantry captain named John DeCamp to be one of his chief assistants in Operation Phoenix, right through to his role in trying to blow open the Franklin cover-up.

I published The Franklin Cover-Up, as much as an insurance policy for myself and my family, as for any other purpose. Colby had pointed to the extreme danger for a person to have secret knowledge about a situation, that others who are affected want to keep out of the public's view. "Some people will go to any lengths to make sure things stay secret," Colby had often repeated to me, "which is why the CIA and the KGB sometimes find their agents dead. Your best interest," he argued, "may well be in publishing what you know and are able to prove, rather than keeping those facts secret. Whether you ever sell a single book or not does not really matter. Putting your information on the public record is what is important. That way, there is no logical reason to harm you or your family, to suppress some truth you have already documented. That is probably your real life insurance policy in something like this Franklin situation," Colby had advised me.

Now, four years later, without a single dollar spent in advertising or promotion, over 50,000 copies of this book have been sold nationwide. I am convinced that this is why I am alive today, although I did receive a warning in September 1996, through reliable sources, that I am targeted--"just like they got Colby." There have also been innumerable attempts to disbar me. Although I have thus far been able to defeat every one of these attempts, they keep coming; to silence me through disbarment is, for those trying to hide the truth on Franklin, the equivalent of assassinating me. So, the battle continues, both in the Franklin case per se--about which I include stunning new material which proves the truth of Part I of this book--and in the new cases in which I have become involved. As a result of the first publication of The Franklin Cover-Up, as an attorney, I have become involved in some of the most famous legal cases now occurring in these United States, from cases involving the militia movement, to the Oklahoma City bombing, to the notorious Gordon Kahl shootout with U.S. Marshals, about which documentaries and movies have been made, to appearances before the U.S. Senate on all of these matters, including Ruby Ridge and Waco. I have appeared on all of the national TV networks, and on many national shows, such as Nightline with Ted Koppel, Good Morning America, CNN's Burden of Proof, America's Most Wanted, and others. So, I say, as I dedicate this second edition of The Franklin Cover-Up to my friend and mentor, William Colby: "Thanks, Bill. You were right, so right it terrifies me. I told the truth, just as you instructed. Now, as a result of the publication of the original Franklin Cover-Up, I have ended up in situations, where, once again, the truth must be told on some explosive new issues, whose consequences rival those of Franklin, for the future of this country."

Thus, this new edition contains eight dramatic new chapters (and an epilogue): The Franklin Investigation, and Cover-up, Continue; Four Years Later--Where Are They Now?; Troy Boner Steps Forward; Drugs and the Monarch Project; From Montana to Oklahoma City; The Oklahoma Bombing; The U.S. Justice Department Murder of Gordon Kahl; and In Memoriam: Bill Colby. This concluding chapter will reveal more about Colby's role in Franklin, and his very last instructions to me, two weeks before his death. Finally, the last word on the Franklin cover-up is delivered in the epilogue--not by me, but by the nineteenth-century novelist Herman Melville. Besides his famous Moby Dick, Melville wrote short stories. A high-ranking personage involved in the Franklin case, told me that one of these stories contained the ultimate secret behind the Franklin cover-up. He was right.

CHAPTER 18
THE FRANKLIN INVESTIGATION , AND COVER-UP, CONTINUE

When the first printing of what you have just read appeared in May 1992, I was threatened with countless law suits by individuals named in the book. I was told by their attorneys, from some of the most prominent law firms in the state and in the country, that "We will destroy you in court." As it turned out, although there have been numerous attempts to disbar me only one law suit for libel and slander was ever launched as a direct result of the book--and that was a suit I launched and won, as I will relate. My victory in that case was but one of a series of what I call the "mini-miracles"--perhaps a hundred or more unforeseen events since the book first hit the streets, which prove the truth of The Franklin Cover-Up. I have chosen a small sampling of these "mini-miracles" to recount here.

After this book appeared, attorneys for Franklin-related individuals repeatedly appeared in the printed media (particularly in the Omaha World Herald) and on TV to make statements such as: "This book is the most libelous and slanderous book I have ever read. The individuals who have been slandered in this book will definitely be filing legal actions to stop distribution of this book and against Mr. John DeCamp personally. That is certain. This book will be stopped and Mr. DeCamp will be proved to be a liar and made to pay damages." When reporters who interviewed the lawyers or principals named in the book contacted me for my response to their threats, I had one standard answer:

"I agree with certain things these people and their attorneys attacking me are saying. I agree that the things described in this book are horrible. If anyone had said these things about me, I agree that I would sue them. I believe if there is anything false in this book or if they believe I have not told the truth in this book, that they should sue me. In fact, I welcome their law suits, because that will help develop the truth. I personally believe I have been most careful and cautious in the way I have handled matters, and only written about those things I can absolutely document."

So, what happened with those threats? Who sued whom? Who proved what?

The only major lawsuit for libel and slander arising from this book was my suit against Atlantic Telecast, owner of a television station in Wilmington, North Carolina, WECT (Channel 6). I charged that statements made on a WECT news broadcast on November 12, 1992, attacking me and the book were false. I demanded a retraction and public apology. The first response I received was from WECT's station manager, who informed me that WECT had consulted its attorneys, that the station had thoroughly investigated the matters described in my book, and that WECT was not only not going to apologize, but planned to repeat the attacks. WECT's attorney further advised me that the station had investigated, in part, by talking to U.S. Senator Bob Kerrey from Nebraska, who was running for president of the United States at the time, and who had visited Wilmington, and met with representatives of the TV station. Further investigation, he claimed, was conducted by talking to the new Wilmington police chief, a man named Robert Wadman--the former police chief of Omaha, Nebraska, who had come to Wilmington in the early 1990s!

After hearing this, I gave a simple demand to WECT: "Rest assured I am ready to prove everything I wrote in my book. I hope you are ready and able to prove your claims made on TV. I give you three weeks for further investigation, and then I will move forward aggressively on my lawsuit against you. At that time, I will seek not only an apology, but substantial monetary damages." Just under three weeks from the date of my ultimatum, attorneys from Atlantic Telecast contacted me and stated that they had done further investigation and acknowledged that now they, not I, were in trouble. Shortly thereafter, a settlement agreement was reached which stipulated: (1) WECT TV would broadcast a retraction and public apology to me on its news broadcasts, and would issue a press release to the same effect; (2) WECT would pay me money damages and other financial benefits; (3) All other details of the settlement, other than those stated above, would be kept confidential for the benefit of the TV station. I accepted the settlement offer, and dismissed my lawsuit. WECT lived up to its part of the settlement, and I have lived up to mine. My lawsuit intersected a fierce political battle between Chief Wadman, upon whom WECT had relied for its information, and his own police department, particularly with an officer named Sgt. Robert Clatty. Sgt. Clatty is the Wilmington Police Department's expert on satanic ritual abuse of children, and is one of North Carolina's recognized experts as well, with published works on the subject. Chief Wadman, on the other hand, claimed that there was no such thing as satanic ritual abuse; he attempted to make it impossible for Sgt. Clatty to carry out his work, and, at one point, suspended him. The publicly waged war between Chief Wadman and his wide array of defenders in Wilmington and across North Carolina, and Wadman' s adversaries, led primarily by Officer Clatty, went as high as the State Legislature. From 1992 until roughly mid-1994, it divided the city of Wilmington, and even the state of North Carolina. The outcome of the war between Chief Wadman and his own force was that in early July 1994, a secret meeting was held with city officials and Wadman's attorney. On July 11, 1994, Wadman resigned as police chief. Although city officials refused to comment on what had transpired in the meeting, Wadman himself admitted in a television interview later that month, that he had been ordered to resign from the Wilmington Police Department.

In May 1992, shortly after the first edition of this book was published, Monsignor Robert Hupp, who had been the head of Boys Town from the late 1970s through the decade of the 1980s--the critical time in question for the Franklin case, contacted me and asked to have a meeting, at which he specified that witnesses must be present. I anticipated that his purpose was to attack me, and to deny what I had written about Boys Town. I was completely wrong. With two witnesses present, Monsignor Hupp opened our discussion with the simple statement: "John DeCamp, your book stated the game; I hope I can help with some of the names." Monsignor Hupp and I then entered into an in-depth discussion on the entire situation involving Boys Town, Larry King, Peter Citron, the pedophile problem in general, and the entire story of the Franklin cover-up. He verified piece after piece of evidence of the Franklin story for me, and provided guidance on other directions in which to look, to develop further proof of the children's stories of abuse by this country's wealthy and powerful. When I asked Monsignor Hupp how this ever could have happened at Boys Town, he looked at me and told me, so apologetically, "I am like the wife who did not know, and was the last to find out. And when I finally did suspect something and tried to act, the Archbishop [Daniel Sheehan] elected to do nothing about it, when I asked him to help. And then, when I came upon something horribly evil, I found public officials and the Church would do nothing-apparently terrified at the damage it would do to the Church and to the entire city of Omaha," Monsignor Hupp said.

"What are you talking about?" I asked him. "Is there some particular story or incident you are talking about in the book that you have more information about? Please explain what you mean," I asked the Monsignor. He then described an incident in 1985, in which a young boy named Shattuck, who lived in Elkhorn, Nebraska, had been sexually abused and then killed. The Monsignor told me that he was certain who had killed the boy, a man he identified as a member of the Catholic clergy in the Omaha Archdiocese. Monsignor Hupp provided precise detail which he said proved beyond any doubt, that the particular individual he named was in fact, the child's murderer. "The Church is plagued by these sexual abuse problems across the country and by the devastating publicity the clergy abuse incidents have caused," Monsignor Hupp explained. "The Church's reaction to these sexual abuse problems is, in most cases, to immediately get the clergy member involved out of the state and, if possible, out of the country, and hopefully into treatment. I know that may not be right, but it is a difficult situation to deal with, and simply moving the priest or the brother out of the state or country has been the traditional approach by the Church in America to addressing the problems. In this case, where an innocent child was murdered and where I know that a member of our clergy has done this, I felt I had a moral obligation overriding all other things, to bring the situation to the attention of the appropriate authorities. And I did," Hupp concluded. The Monsignor then shocked me for the second time that day--and in a way that brought back to me the horrible memories of the Franklin cover-up. He explained that after he determined that the Catholic Archbishop of Omaha was not going to take action on the case he then went to the FBI and to the Omaha law enforcement authorities to provide complete details on the child's murder.

So, what happened as a result of Monsignor Hupp's actions? Apparently, nothing. Each year on the anniversary of the child's murder--now almost ten years--the media talks about the case as still being "under investigation," and street rumors persist about the Catholic clergyman--the one Monsignor Hupp believes killed the child--who was shipped out of state for alcohol treatment right after the murder. In the aftermath of our meeting, Monsignor Hupp ran into his own problems. In September 1992, the Monsignor advised me that he was receiving all kinds of pressure and criticism and was, he feared, being forced to leave Boys Town. Shortly after that discussion, in a controversy that received national press attention on how resources should be used at Boys Town, Monsignor Hupp was removed from his post. He now lives quietly in a home in West Omaha, Nebraska. Monsignor Hupp has shown incredible courage, as he has continued to provide me direction and assistance in the Franklin investigation and related matters. Monsignor Hupp is not some 13-year-old kid whom the cops say they cannot trust or believe. On the contrary, he is one of America' s most famous and nationally honored clergymen; the author of two best sellers; a former Presidential Appointee as Special Ambassador to the United Nations; and the former head of America's most famous child care institution (Boys Town). Monsignor Hupp showed his courage yet again, when he repeated his charges a year later to a British TV team making a documentary on the Franklin cover-up, entitled Conspiracy of Silence.

In mid-1993, after The Franklin Cover-Up had been circulating for almost a year, the British-based TV station, Yorkshire Television, sent a top-notch team to Nebraska to launch its own investigation of the Franklin case. Yorkshire had a contract with the Discovery Channel to produce a documentary on the case for American television. They spent many months in Nebraska, and also traveled this country from one end to the other, interviewing, filming, and documenting piece-by-piece the Franklin story as I had told it in the book. They spent somewhere between a quarter-million and one-half million dollars investigating the story, deploying probably a thousand times the resources and abilities that I personally had. Over the year that I worked with them, I was amazed at the team's ability to gather new documents and witnesses which kept opening up new and frightening facts about Franklin. They were a crack team. In the final weeks that they were in Nebraska, they expressed their certainty that they would win awards for this documented horror story of government-sanctioned drug-running involving children; government-sanctioned abuse of children; and government protection of some of this country's most powerful businessmen and politicians, who had been the chief actors in the Franklin story. Finally, the big day came. Their documentary was to air nationwide on the Discovery Channel on May 3, 1994. It was advertised in the TV Guide and in newspapers for that day. But no one ever saw that program. At the last minute, and without explanation, it was pulled from the air.

It was not shown then, and has never been broadcast anywhere since. I have a copy of that program, which arrived anonymously in my mail in late 1995. When I watched this pirated copy, I could see clearly why the program had been suppressed. Conspiracy of Silence proved, beyond doubt, that the essential points I had stressed in the book (and more) were all true. For instance, the team had interviewed Troy Boner. Sometime after that grand jury was over, Troy, guilt-stricken because of his lying over Gary Caradori's death, contacted me and told the truth about what had happened. This is recorded in a remarkable affidavit (see Chapter 20). The Yorkshire TV team spent a small fortune to confirm Troy's charges. They flew Troy to Chicago and paid for a lengthy polygraph (lie detector) test at the Keeler Polygraph Institute. With the results of that test, the Yorkshire team was so convinced that Troy was telling the truth, that they featured him in their documentary. It was only in mid-1996, that I finally pieced together, through sources I am not at liberty to disclose, what happened to stop the broadcast of this documentary.

1. At the time the Yorkshire TV team and the Discovery Channel were doing the documentary, they had no idea how high up the case would go into Government, and; what major institutions and personalities in this country, would be found to be linked to the Franklin story. Ultimately, the documentary focused on several limited aspects documented in this book, and developed them much more extensively than I ever had the resources or abilities to accomplish.

2. These areas which the documentary focused on, were: (a) the use and involvement of Boys Town children and personalities in the Franklin Scandal, particularly Peter Citron and Larry King's relationships to Boys Town; (b) the linkage of Franklin to some of this country's top politicians in Washington, and in the U.S. Congress, with particular attention on those who attended parties held by Larry King at his Washington mansion on Embassy Row; (c) the impropriety of these-politicians and businessmen and compromising of these people by Larry King, through drugs and using children for pedophilia.

3. When the broadcast tape was sent to the United States, Customs officials seized the documentary and held it up as being "pornographic material." Attorneys for Discovery Channel and Yorkshire TV were able to get the documentary released. Then, the lawyers went through the film for months, making this or that change or deletion, so that the documentary ultimately advertised to be shown on the Discovery Channel on May 3, 1994, would survive any claims of libel or slander that any of the individuals identified in the documentary might attempt to bring. The lawyers had cleared the documentary for broadcast.

4. During the several months that the documentary was being prepared and advertised for showing, major legislation impacting the entire future of the Cable TV industry was being debated on Capitol Hill. Legislation, which the industry opposed, was under debate for placing controls on the industry and the contents of what could be shown. Messages were delivered in no uncertain terms from key politicians involved in the Cable TV battle, that if the Conspiracy of Silence were shown on the Discovery Channel as planned, then the industry would probably lose the debate. An agreement was reached: Conspiracy of Silence was pulled, and with no rights for sale or broadcast by any other program; Yorkshire TV would be reimbursed for the costs of production, the Discovery Channel itself would never be linked to the documentary; and copies of Conspiracy in Silence would be destroyed. Not all copies were destroyed, however, as I and some others received anonymously in the mail a copy of the nearly-finished product.

I said in Chapter 12, "The Omaha Business Community": "As essential to Franklin as [Harold] Andersen's fundraising and publicity were, the credit union could not have functioned for a single day without the complicity of Nebraska's largest bank, FirsTier.... Every dollar that went into Franklin Credit Union--the missing $40 million was no exception-went into its account #153-7-353 at FirsTier." In October 1994, evidence released through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) proved exactly how right I was. These FOIA documents showed that some of the same attorneys who had threatened so loudly to sue me, together with the FirsTier Bank with which they were associated, had reached a financial settlement with the National Credit Union Association (NCUA), in which they agreed to pay the NCUA $10 million in damages for their role in improprieties involving Franklin. The attorneys had to come up with over $6 million, and First Tier itself, over $3 million. Despite the fact that the FirsTier case was the biggest malpractice settlement in the history of Nebraska, and despite the fact that the settlement involved very prominent individuals--including former Republican Governor Charlie Thone and attorney Jay Derr--the story received almost no coverage in the press, that is, before the FOIA material became public. Then the World Herald jumped in with a huge editorial in October, 1994, entitled "Franklin Credit Union Crimes Unfairly Claim New Victims." The World Herald wrote: "Some defendants, including banks and a law firm, have agreed to pay more than $10 million to the NCUA to settle the claims. They admitted no wrongdoing. They said they acted to avoid prolonged litigation. Their position is understandable. Litigation is expensive. Moreover, this particular litigation ran the risk of creating a false impression.... The impression could have taken hold that a wide circle of legal and financial advisers sat on the knowledge that King was looting the credit union.... Such an impression would have been false."

There was, indeed, "a wide circle of legal and financial advisers" in on the looting of Franklin, just as I had charged, and whom I name in Chapter 12, "The Omaha Business Community." Finally, some of them, at least, had to pay for it. Nor was this the only multi-million dollar scam to be exposed in the wake of the first edition of this book.

In Chapter 6, I described another big money scheme that intersected the Franklin case--the looting of the Commonwealth Savings Bank, in which I filed a claim on behalf of the Commonwealth victims. To my surprise and joy, I succeeded beyond all my expectations in this case--until a strained interpretation of our state Constitution was put forward by Nebraska's Supreme Court. First, I presented to the Claims Board the Commonwealth story exactly as described in this book, but with even more extensive documentation. The Claims Board agreed and reached a Settlement for some $16,000,000.00 to be paid to the Commonwealth victims. But, the Legislature had to approve this, as did the Governor. So, we took the matter of the settlement--with me as attorney for the Claimants and victims--to the State Legislature. Surprise--in a close but bitter battle, enough Senators stood up to acknowledge the horrible acts that had occurred, and the intense suffering of the Commonwealth victims that resulted. The settlement was approved. Next, we went to the Governor, who signed the legislation for the settlement. Then, the matter was taken to court by certain unnamed individuals (concerned citizens), who claimed that they did not want their tax money used to pay these Commonwealth victims. Nebraska has a unique section in its State Constitution which forbids the state from using any tax dollars for purposes of extending the credit of the state or granting a gift. The result: that which the Claims Board, and the Legislature and the Governor all agreed the Commonwealth Savings Bank victims were entitled to because of the failures of the Government in Commonwealth, was taken away by the Supreme Court of the State of Nebraska. The Court claimed that Nebraska's Constitution forbids paying the money to the victims, because they were only victims of moral wrongdoing, rather than legal wrongdoing. And John DeCamp, who would have become a multi-millionaire out of the case because I had done it on a contingent fee basis, ended up with nothing but the certain knowledge that I had established the truth as I have written in this book with respect to Commonwealth Savings Bank and certain of the personalities who are today so prominent on the national scene-Senator Bobby Kerrey, for example.

Besides Yorkshire TV, the most notable among the electronic media which became interested in the Franklin story was the TV program, America's Most Wanted (AMW). In several episodes, AMW opened up a whole new dimension on just how high up politically the story went and how wide it reached across the country. For a while, I had great hopes. For example, AMW interviewed Paul Bonacci in prison and broadcast his account of a host of specific details about individuals, places, activities, kidnappings, etc., in which he said he had participated.

To the shock of AMW (and sometimes, of myself), the incidents Paul Bonacci described, when investigated by AMW, turned out to be exactly as Paul had recounted. For instance, a young boy named "Jimmy" who had been branded by pedophile perpetrators--like you would brand a steer. END

>>>Snip. Follow the link for the rest of the thread at Freepers.
 

db cooper

Resident Secret Squirrel
Today we call them scum bag pedophiles.

And the Catholic churh will not allowing their priests to marry or have conventional sex, is permitting the priests to be perverts. How sickening. What a message this is sending to little catholic kids: "It's ok to be soddomized, but it is not OK to have sex with the opposite sex".

In 5, 10 or 15 years from now, when the lefties are further entrenched in cultural change of America, we will be the bad guys. We will be called "pedophobes" or what ever stupid name they come up with to make it look like we are the ones with a problem. Anyone condeming such acts against children will be guilty of hate crimes and punished.

Tell me there is no Devil.
 

Gary Walsh

Contributing Member
How can a 501 C (3) group have the guts to file bankruptcy??

Does anyone see a scam here?

Only companies in business to make profits do that. Is there something I'm missing?

I smell something but I'm not sure where it's coming from, YET.......
 

alchemike

Veteran Member
french childrens charity has names of pedophiles in gov and biz...

if i were a child raper, i'd be getting pretty nervous about now...all the old tricks seem to be 'seen thru'...

pay close attention to the last paragraph in this story...

the jig is up...

o)<

mike

http://the-news.net/cgi-bin/story.pl?title=Paedophile scandal - authorities accused&edition=681

Paedophile scandal - authorities accused

Portugal’s Innocence in Danger (ID) children’s charity has applauded the Expresso newspaper for exposing the Cascais Casa Pia paedophile scandal. At the same time it has acknowledged the positive contribution made by THE NEWS and TVI in publicising the on-going problem of paedophile activity within Portugal.

A spokeswoman for the charity criticised other national newspapers and TV media for what she described as a “virtual blackout” of the warnings given out by organisations such as ID on Portugal’s escalating paedophile problem. She said that the question must be asked as to why even international conferences on paedophilia, including the recent Paris meeting held under the patronage of President Jacques Chirac, had gone unreported by the Portuguese news media. Only TVI and The News covered the event.

The arrest of two suspects for their alleged 20 years of paedophile activity at the Cascais Children’s Home has resurrected the long running debate amongst child protection groups of political and police cover-ups. The ID spokeswoman told THE NEWS that the past failures of the Portuguese authorities to fully investigate the hundreds of complaints of sexual abuse of children carried out by staff at children’s homes was outrageous.

“It is no good President Sampaio and Parliament sounding off about the problem now and appearing to be knights in shining armour” she said, “they, like the police, must have known about the widespread abuse of children in Portuguese institutions for years. They have been warned often enough by charities such as ours but for reasons best known to themselves have remained silent. Their recent acts of breast beating are arrant hypocrisy.”

She said that the government’s vetting procedures where people with previous convictions for paedophilia are prevented from working with children were wholly inadequate. In many cases of child sexual abuse the perpetrators invariably have a history of either having been previously under suspicion or convicted of paedophile activity. She said that it is about time the Portuguese government dragged itself into the 21st., century and introduced meaningful vetting processes as is the case in the USA.

But the crux of the problem, according to the spokeswoman, is the reluctance or inability of the police to carry out thorough investigations into reported acts of child sexual abuse. Either they are totally inadequate or under pressure from outside influences.

“Time and again” she said, “complaint files are lost, witnesses are seldom interviewed and suspects let off the hook by totally inept search methods and investigative procedures. Look at what happened during the 1980’s investigations at Casa Pia. If only a cursory police inquiry had taken place perhaps it would have prevented the disaster that has occurred during the past 20 years.”

She urged the victims and their families to sue the police and local authorities under the European Human Rights Act, for gross negligence in failing to protect the lives of innocent children. Innocence in Danger is prepared to offer advice to any parent who decides to sue.

Beyond doubt the authorities will have to come up with a lot of answers to some very awkward questions. For instance, given the mountain of evidence they had in the 1980’s why did they do absolutely nothing to stop the blatant child abuse that was taking place at Casa Pia? Why is there no record of the politicians allegedly named in the complaint files being interviewed? Will any action be taken against those in high places, if and when one of the suspects, who have threatened to spill the beans, exposes them as being involved in one of Portugal’s biggest paedophile rings?

It has all the hallmarks of the Marc Dutroux case where for seven years the Belgium authorities have prevaricated about bringing to trial a self confessed paedophile who is alleged to have sexually abused and murdered children. Child campaigners claim that the reason why Dutroux will never be brought to trial is that he would not hesitate to identify the paedophile politicians and businessmen to whom he supplied children.

Innocence in Danger is concerned that unless there is a radical overhaul of police procedures in respect of identifying and prosecuting paedophiles the general public will take things into their own hands. It has called for more transparency and accountability in respect of the authorities keeping the public fully updated on paedophile investigations. Also recommended is the appointment of an ombudsman to monitor the intent and progress of the police in such cases.

Portugal’s reputation as being one of Europe’s most popular centres for paedophiles is growing. Several children’s organisations have already accused the authorities of adopting a very relaxed attitude to child abuse. One described Portugal as becoming a mini Thailand for paedophile tourists.

The American anti-paedophile campaigner, Christine Dolan, who recently addressed the United Nations in Geneva on child trafficking, is preparing a report on Portugal’s paedophilia problems for the Duke of Bragança, Don Duarte. The duke is hoping the report will convince the government to tighten up existing legislation, and also introduce new procedures, whereby children’s testimony in sex abuse cases is made available to the courts. At present parents complain that their children, who have been abused, are denied the right of a full hearing by the Portuguese courts. A similar situation exists in France.

A French based children’s charity claims to have on its files the names of businessmen and government officials who are actively involved in paedophile rings. The list covers the Euro zone including Portugal. THE NEWS has been told that should the authorities attempt to do a whitewash job on the Casa Pia scandal those names with Portuguese connections will be made public regardless of the legal implications.
 

alchemike

Veteran Member
chip them...chip them all...

maybe the only good use of these things i can think of...

o)<

mike

http://www.observer.co.uk/politics/story/0,6903,841827,00.html

Surgical tags plan for sex offenders

Silicon chip to be inserted under skin

Martin Bright, home affairs editor
Sunday November 17, 2002
The Observer

Britain is considering a controversial scheme to implant surgically electronic tags in convicted paedophiles amid fears that the extent of the abuse of children has been massively underestimated.
Documents obtained by The Observer reveal the Government could track paedophiles by satellite, with a system similar to that used to locate stolen cars.

The tags can be put beneath the skin under local anaesthetic and would also be able to monitor the heart rate and blood pressure of the abuser, alerting staff to the possibility that another attack was imminent.

A letter from Hilary Benn, the Minister responsible for the supervision of sex offenders in the community, reveals the Home Office's electronic monitoring team is already developing technology to track paedophiles constantly. The team is now investigating the 'implant tag' after it was alerted to its capabilities by a campaign group for victims of paedophiles.

Tracker, the company which runs Britain's largest stolen vehicle monitoring network, has already been approached about paedophile monitoring and computer company Compaq has been asked to develop the software.

Compaq Software Solutions has developed similar technology for Nasa to monitor remotely the bodily functions of astronauts. In the case of paedophiles, the technology would not measure sexual excitement, but would monitor the offender's state of nervousness and fear.

Technology currently used can tell only whether an offender is where he is supposed to be, which is usually a curfew address. New 'reverse tags' can also monitor whether an offender is approaching a former victim's house or a high-risk area such as a school, but it can not track every movement.

In a letter to Labour MP Andrew Mackinley, Benn wrote: 'The Electronic Monitoring Team is... looking actively at the possibilities for using tracking technology to monitor offenders' whereabouts as they move from one place to another. To date... the team is unaware of any available technology which uses bodily implants to track offenders' movements or which can measure bodily functions to predict likely criminal activity. Such future improvements are, however, worthy of consideration if it can be demonstrated to be feasible and reliable in delivering improvements in public protection.'

Ministers would need to pass new legislation to oblige offenders to be surgically fitted with the tags.

Civil liberties groups expressed horror at the proposals last night. 'Implanting tracking devices provides a very frightening vision for the future. We already know that the rules protecting our privacy are inadequate. Where would this stop?' said John Wadham, director of Liberty. 'This would be used initially for sex offenders, but we would soon find that other marginalised groups, such as asylum seekers, would find they were forced to have implants.'

The implant tag has been proposed by Phoenix Survivors, a group of child abuse victims who were traded as child prostitutes in the north-west of England. Their name is taken from Operation Phoenix, an investigation into the activities of 72-year-old Stanley Claridge.

Claridge's stepdaughter and Phoenix Survivors' spokeswoman Shy Keenan said: 'I am sick to death of it being acceptable that I am a victim because these people have to have their human rights. These people live outside the law and cannot be controlled, so you have to know what they are doing all the time.'

The news of the implant tags comes after the first wave of arrests from a list of 7,000 suspected British paedophiles was passed to British police by investigators from the US Postal Inspection Service.

Credit card details had been traced to British customers of a portal on the internet, which gave access to hundreds of child porn sites. An investigation by Northumbria police as part of the nationwide Operation Ore led to the seizure of hard drives from more than 100 computers. Police in the North East had been given around 70 names from the list of 7,000 to arrest. In all, 56 men and four women were arrested. They were not picked up by the usual vetting procedures because most had no previous criminal record.

The computer files seized included the scenes of the rape of children as young as two. One man had 12,000 images of child abuse on his computer. As a result, Northumbria Police has estimated that the numbers of people on the Sex Offenders' Register in the area will increase by 10 per cent. If the hit-rate of the Northumbria investigation is replicated across the country, it could lead to as many as 5,000 arrests.
 

alchemike

Veteran Member
law in rome...

how do you claim bankruptcy when your boss runs the richest corporation on the planet???

well, mr. law may not be around long enough to find the answer...

chip him (see previous post)...

o)<

mike

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A27642-2002Dec8.html

Boston Cardinal in Rome as Scandal Pressure Grows

Reuters
Sunday, December 8, 2002; 6:20 PM

By Greg Frost

BOSTON (Reuters) - Cardinal Bernard Law has left for Rome, a spokeswoman for the Archdiocese of Boston said Sunday as pressure grew on the senior U.S. prelate to resign over his handling of clergy sexual abuse.

"I can confirm that the cardinal is in Rome," archdiocese spokeswoman Donna Morrissey told Reuters. She declined to comment on when he left or on when he would return.

Law has come under renewed pressure after personnel files made public last week showed the archdiocese allowed priests accused of sexual misconduct to remain in ministry or failed to persuade them to receive proper psychiatric treatment.

The documents revealed one priest was assigned to two parishes despite his record of molesting boys, another molested young girls while telling them he was the living embodiment of Jesus Christ and a third fathered two children and did not immediately call for help when their mother overdosed.

Earlier, Law abruptly canceled an appearance at Sunday Mass as rank-and-file Roman Catholic priests circulated a letter urging him to resign and angry protesters denounced his leadership of the archdiocese.

"The priests and people of Boston have lost confidence in you as their spiritual leader," the priests wrote in the letter to Law, a copy of which was published in The Boston Globe.

The Rev. Robert Nee, one of the priests who signed the letter, told Reuters it would likely be delivered to Law's residence on Sunday.

While several priests have individually urged Law to step down, no group of clerics had yet done so. Stephen Pope, chair of the Theology Department at Boston College, a Jesuit university, has said that any collective call by priests for Law to resign would signal "open revolt" in the archdiocese.

'MORALLY BANKRUPT'

Law's departure from Boston marked at least the second time this year that he has headed to the Vatican amid calls for him to step down.

In April, Law canceled an appearance at Sunday Mass and went into seclusion. A few days later he met with Pope John Paul II in Rome to discuss the impact of the scandal.

Law, leader of some 2.1 million Catholics, has apologized repeatedly for his handling of abuse cases by priests but has so far refused to abandon his job.

In one of the biggest protests since the crisis began earlier this year, some 400 protesters gathered outside Boston's Cathedral of the Holy Cross on Sunday and urged state authorities to bring criminal charges against him over his handling of clergy sexual abuse.

Waving signs that read "Cardinal Law Must Go -- A Disgrace to Good Catholics" and "Reassign Law," the demonstrators said the documents made public last week showed Law was far more involved in covering up alleged sexual misconduct by priests than he had previously admitted.

The release of the files came as the archdiocese threatened to declare bankruptcy as a way of dealing with the estimated 450 lawsuits it faces from clergy sexual assault victims.

"Cardinal Law said this week the church is bankrupt. No truer words were ever said. This church is morally bankrupt," 54-year-old Susan Renehan, who says a priest sexually abused her from the age of 11 to 14, told demonstrators.

Donald Smith, another alleged victim of clergy sexual abuse, said he was infuriated by the documents released over the past week. "Cardinal Law has succeeded in shattering my faith in the Catholic Church, but not in God," Smith said. "Jesus would be on our side."

The abuse scandal erupted when files released in the case of defrocked priest and convicted pedophile John Geoghan showed that Law and other church leaders knew of accusations against the cleric but instead chose to shuttle him from parish to parish without warning parents.
 

alchemike

Veteran Member
liam neeson to portray pedophile, kinsey...

i for one hope he does go thru with the role...

anything that will generate more awareness and action on these topics...

o)<

mike



http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=29891

Monday, December 9, 2002



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MEDIA MATTERS
Film star to portray
'sex reformer' Kinsey
Neeson urged to skip role as 'infamous pedophile propagandist'

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: December 9, 2002
1:00 a.m. Eastern



By Art Moore



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
© 2002 WorldNetDaily.com
One of Hollywood's leading men is risking his reputation with a plan to portray the "father of the sexual revolution," Alfred Kinsey, contends a chief critic of the late researcher.


Actor Liam Neeson

The Francis Ford Coppola biographical drama, set to begin production next spring, has tapped Irish-born star Liam Neeson to bring to life a man researcher Judith Reisman calls the "most infamous pedophile propagandist in scientific history."

The screenplay, with the working title "Kinsey's Report," was written by Oscar-winner Bill Condon of "Gods and Monsters" fame, who also will direct the film.

Condon, who says there would be "no Playboy or Dr. Ruth without [Kinsey's] liberating effects," promises it will not be an "art-house movie."

"I hope it's one of those movies that speaks about things," he said in an interview published by E! online. "It does feel like it's time to remind people of Kinsey's ideas, which I think are liberating. I hope there's an exhilarating feeling you get when you come out of the theater."

Open letter

But Reisman, author of "Kinsey: Crimes & Consequences," has sent an open letter of warning to Neeson, asserting that the film will place him in "a hideously inaccurate role, much like playing the monster Mengele as a mere controversial figure."

She wrote: "Mr. Neeson, an appealing and respected actor like you surely does not wish to be known for celebrating a man who directed massive child sexual abuse."

An assistant to Neeson's agent Ed Limato said Thursday that Reisman's letter was forwarded to the actor's "people," but they "cannot guarantee a response."

But later in the day, according to Reisman, Neeson's office requested a copy of a film produced by Britain's Yorkshire Television called "Kinsey's Paedophiles."


Alfred C. Kinsey

Reisman, who has critiqued Kinsey's research for more than 20 years, says Kinsey increasingly is discounted by scholars as a "pathetic sexual psychopath" whose data were derived from an unrepresentative proportion of the population – mostly prison inmates and sex offenders, including pedophiles. Kinsey concluded, for example, that 69 percent of white males had had at least one experience with a prostitute.

Kinsey biographer James H. Jones, former adviser to the Kinsey Institute at Indiana University, has admitted that Kinsey, the father of three children, was not the conventional academic and family man the university presented, but was sexually compromised. In his 1997 book "Alfred C. Kinsey: A Public/Private Life," which was excerpted by New Yorker magazine, the author describes the sex researcher as a sadomasochistic homosexual on a perverted mission. Kinsey produced pornography in his attic – filming his wife, male staff and their wives as performers – and sexually harassed his male students.

Reisman notes that Kinsey, who died in 1956, is praised by the North American Man-Boy Love Association for creating the "data" that support "the struggle we fight today." She finds his work as the basis for weakened laws and cultural norms that have helped foster a sharp rise in sex crimes against children, noting that 58,200 abductions by non-family members were recorded by the FBI in 1999, most of which involved sexual victimization.

In 1981, Reisman delivered a paper to the 5th World Congress on Sexuality, charging that the Kinsey Reports contained a record of human experiments conducted by pedophiles on hundreds, perhaps thousands, of children. The Kinsey study has been used to support the contention that sexual activity in children is natural and healthy and should not be repressed.

She points to pages 160-161 of Kinsey's 1948 book "Sexual Behavior in the Human Male," in which the children's "screams," their "convulsions," their "hysterical weeping," "fighting" and "striking the partner (adult)" are judged by Kinsey as reflecting "definite pleasure from the situation."

Kinsey Institute director John Bancroft maintains that the institute "has never carried out sexual experiments on children, either during Alfred Kinsey's time as director or since."

He has acknowledged, however, that the data on "speed of orgasm" and other details in Tables 31-34 of Kinsey's 1948 book could only have been collected through illegal activity. In a 1998 paper by Bancroft called "Kinsey and Children," he says the information "came from the carefully documented records of one man." Kinsey referred to the man as "Mr. Green," a pedophile who kept meticulous records of the 800 boys he molested between 1917 and 1948.

Reisman maintains, however, that the 1998 documentary "Kinsey's Paedophiles," which has never been shown in the U.S., documented that Kinsey solicited information from and directed the data gathering of many pedophiles.

"Mr. Bancroft eagerly dodges the fact that whether Kinsey used one rapist to tell the world that child sex is normal, or whether he recruited many rapists – which he did – it doesn't change the fact that there isn't a shred of scientific data that would support the notion of child sexuality," Reisman told WND.

In response to a 1998 resolution by the Indiana state legislature urging the assembly to not appropriate public funds to the institute, Bancroft said of Kinsey:

"He can be criticized for making use of information about children's sexual responses obtained from individuals who were criminally involved with those children, not because it was improper to do so, but because of the uncertain validity of such information. But the large part of his work remains a supreme example of dedicated scientific research which continues to be important and useful to all of those who are researching in the field."

Bancroft maintained that "however much Kinsey's scientific curiosity may have misled him, he did nothing wrong, 'criminal,' or 'fraudulent.' Some have criticized him for not reporting this man to the police. Any tendency to do such a thing, with this research subject or any other, would have been contrary to the whole ethical basis of his project, in which he persuaded people to share their sexual secrets in return for a guarantee of confidentiality."

Playing real people

Empire Online, which calls itself the UK's No. 1 film website, says of the Kinsey movie: "With production ready to start next March, ready yourself for a touch of sexual perversity, a measure of gender confusion and every kind of reproductive action. All in the name of scientific research, of course."

A recent interview with Neeson in the London Observer newspaper noted that the actor's best roles have been historical and eponymous figures, such as Oskar Schindler in "Schindler's List." When the interviewer described characters Neeson has played – such as Schindler, Rob Roy and Michael Collins – as men "struggling to do the right thing, despite their predisposition, usually in the face of societal constraints," the actor replied:

"In fact, next year, I'm gonna play Alfred Kinsey, the guy who did all the research on sexuality and sexual politics in America in the '50s. His results were astounding. Really big stuff. He got on the cover of Time magazine."

Neeson said he does not set out to play real people.

"What usually motivates me is the quality of the writing," he said. "But yeah, I guess I may subconsciously seek them out. These are people who stand for something, something that is good to remind audiences of. They had a code of ethics that you perhaps don't find anymore."

Big stars

Academy Award-winning actors Russell Crowe, Tom Hanks, Kevin Spacey and Harrison Ford "all flirted with the lead role in one of the hottest scripts making the rounds," according to Anderson Jones in his "Movie Scoops" column on E! online. George Clooney was asked to take the Kinsey role, but passed, according to Jones, who called the film project "a provocative, erotic and potentially controversial movie."

"Kinsey is this amazing character," said director Condon, according to Jones' report, "very, very complicated. It's an interesting, difficult part to cast. When it comes to sex, people come with a lot of baggage, and the challenge will be getting the baggage that fits Kinsey's. You need an actor who will bring you inside this character."

Condon said he also considered Ralph Fiennes, Jeff Bridges and Michael Douglas for the role.

Jones commented that the Kinsey film "appeals to actors looking for a challenge, because it's craftily structured around a series of flashbacks and flash-forwards, features explicit discussions about sexuality and hints of Kinsey's widely reported bisexuality."

The script is not new, Jones said. About 10 years ago, screenwriter Michael Davis wrote another script called Kinsey, which turned out to be a "practically unreadable light comedy that mined laughs from Dr. Kinsey's 'embarrassing' sexual peccadilloes."

The film, financed by Myriad Pictures, will be released in the U.S. by MGM's United Artists division. "Kinsey" is one of five Myriad-financed films to be produced by Coppola's American Zoetrope studios. The Hollywood Reporter notes that three of the five come from openly homosexual artists, including Condon.

Much at stake

For the Kinsey Institute, according to Reisman, the film likely will be seen as a boon to the institute's attempts to bolster Kinsey's reputation in the face of mounting criticism of his character and work.

"The Kinsey Institute is in very serious rehabilitation mode," Reisman said, noting that at a 50th anniversary celebration of Kinsey's first book, in 1998, an academic in the field of "sexology" stated that if Kinsey were undermined, it would "undermine everything we had been working on for all these years."

Bancroft announced in 1998 that the Ford Foundation had supplied a grant to help fund a media-relations firm to plan "a proactive strategy to counter the ongoing campaign to shut down the Kinsey Institute and discredit its founder."

In her book "Kinsey, Crimes, & Consequences," Reisman shows how Kinsey and his sex reports of 1948 and 1953 undergird the entire modern academic sexology field, including institutions such as Planned Parenthood and SIECUS, the Sex Information and Education Council of the U.S., which helped launch sex education in schools when it was founded in 1964.

The Kinsey Institute is clearly uneasy about probes into the Kinsey archive, according to one of Kinsey's most recent biographers, Englishman Jonathan Gathorne-Hardy.

In the Yorkshire film production on Kinsey, produced by award-winner Tim Tate, Gathorne-Hardy tells how he was given access to Kinsey's March 1956 files, which show the sex researcher's use of pedophiles.

Describing the Kinsey Institute as "nervous" because "its funding depends a lot on its reputation," Hardy said director Bancroft demanded that Hardy swear he never personally saw the documents.

Hardy's typewritten notes regarding the exchange with Bancroft said:


Must be written as if information got from [former director] Paul [Gebhard] and Bancroft. ... Don't reveal that [Kinsey] went on gathering histories [from these pedophiles] until 1954.
Hardy's notes on the file indicate several active pedophiles on Kinsey's list of aides:


[Kinsey] was deeply influenced by five pedophile headmasters who were quite clear they had very warm relationships, loving relationships with young adolescent boys of 12 or 13.
In her letter to Neeson, Reisman warned that Yorkshire Television would want to reissue its "unflattering documentary should you make this film."

"Please disengage yourself from this unworthy production, and please feel free to contact me should you want to talk or to see the extant documentation on any and all of the statements above," Reisman wrote. "Thank you."
 

alchemike

Veteran Member
today's theme...subpoenas...

imagine a roach...running around on a kitchen floor trying to avoid the beam of a flashlight...

but he is steadily worked toward a corner...

o)<

mike

http://abcnews.go.com/wire/US/reuters20021212_383.html

Law, 7 Bishops Subpoenaed in U.S. Criminal Probe

Dec. 12
— By Greg Frost

BOSTON (Reuters) - Boston Cardinal Bernard Law was served a subpoena last Friday to appear before a Massachusetts grand jury investigating sex abuse by priests, sources familiar with the probe said on Thursday, and the cardinal apparently left the city the same day.

Grand jury subpoenas were also served last week on seven Roman Catholic bishops with ties to the Archdiocese of Boston, the sources said. Law had been served his subpoena on Friday and The Boston Globe said that was the same day the cardinal left for Washington, where he departed on Saturday for Rome.

Law, who arrived at the Vatican amid a simmering revolt among priests and parishioners in his archdiocese, was still in Rome and may meet with Pope John Paul II on Friday, papal spokesman Joaquin Navarro-Valls said. It is possible the cardinal may hand the Pope his resignation as he did in April, when the pontiff rejected it.

The senior U.S. prelate has held talks with top Vatican officials all week about his future and plans for the archdiocese to declare bankruptcy as a way of dealing with some 450 clergy sexual abuse lawsuits.

Word of the subpoenas came after Voice of the Faithful, a Catholic lay group with more than 25,000 members, joined dozens of Law's own priests in calling for his ouster.

At least 58 Boston-area priests asked Law to step down in a letter delivered to his residence earlier this week.

The Rev. Robert Bullock, chairman of the largest forum of Roman Catholic priests in the archdiocese, predicted more clergy would join those who already signed the statement.

Bullock and eight other leaders of The Boston Priests' Forum, which has some 250 members, will meet on Friday and may reissue the letter for more priests to sign, he said.

CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION

The subpoenas not only marked a crucial turning point in the grand jury probe but also opened a more ominous chapter in a crisis that erupted in the Boston archdiocese in January.

Angry protesters last Sunday in Boston urged Massachusetts Attorney General Tom Reilly to secure criminal indictments against Law and his former top associates for shuttling known pedophile priests from parish to parish.

Serving the subpoenas to the cardinal and the bishops signals that Reilly moved closer to granting the demonstrators their wish.

A spokeswoman for Reilly confirmed his office has an "ongoing, active criminal investigation" involving the church, but she declined to comment further. A spokeswoman for the archdiocese did not return a telephone call seeking comment.

Among the church officials who received subpoenas were Bishop John McCormack of Manchester, New Hampshire, Bishop Thomas Daily of Brooklyn, New York, and Archbishop Alfred Hughes of New Orleans, the sources said.

Daily, formerly a top official in the Boston church, said in a sworn deposition earlier this year that the archdiocese knew that one of the priests at the heart of the current crisis, the Rev. Paul Shanley, had advocated sex between men and boys when it promoted him to lead a parish in 1983.

On Tuesday, McCormack reached a settlement with New Hampshire state prosecutors in their criminal investigation of the Diocese of Manchester. Under the terms of the deal, McCormack was forced to acknowledge that his diocese had failed to protect children from pedophile priests.

Voice of the Faithful's executive council voted late on Wednesday to urge Law to step down.

The move marked a radical shift for the non-clergy reform group born out of the current scandal. For months it resisted asking Law to resign, and only weeks ago it held its first face-to-face meeting with the cardinal.

But group leaders said they were sickened by new revelations of adulterous relationships, pedophilia and drug use involving archdiocese clergy, and by more accusations that church leaders reassigned priests with records of sexual misconduct.

The group, which began in the basement of a church earlier this year with a handful of members, called on Pope John Paul II to appoint a replacement to Law. It also asked the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops to act on the situation in Boston.
 

alchemike

Veteran Member
for those who've been following this thread all along...

time to start talking about what's really going on...

the following may be difficult for 'survivors'...use caution...

o)<

mike

http://www.tesserae.org/tess/places/gb.html

THE GREENBAUM SPEECH

Herein is the lecture by D.C.Hammond, originally entitled "Hypnosis in MPD: Ritual Abuse," but now usually known as the "Greenbaum Speech," delivered at the Fourth Annual Eastern Regional Conference on Abuse and Multiple Personality, Thursday June 25, 1992, at the Radisson Plaza Hotel, Mark Center, Alexandria, Virginia. Sponsored by the Center for Abuse Recovery & Empowerment, The Psychiatric Institute of Washington, D.C. Both a tape and a transcript were at one time available from Audio Transcripts of Alexandria, Virginia (800-338-2111). Tapes and transcripts of other sessions from the conference are still being sold but -- understandably -- not this one. The transcript below was made from a privately made tape of the original lecture.

The single most remarkable thing about this speech is how little one has heard of it in the two years since its original delivery. It is recommended that one reads far enough at least until one finds why it's called "the Greenbaum speech."

In the introduction the following background information is given for D. Corydon Hammond:

B.S. M.S. Ph.D (Counseling Psychology) from the University of Utah

Diplomate in Clinical Hypnosis, the American Board of Psychological Hypnosis

Diplomate in Sex Therapy, the American Board of Sexology

Clinical Supervisor and Board Examiner, American Board of Sexology

Diplomate in Marital and Sex Therapy, American Board of Family Psychology

Licensed Psychologist, Licensed Marital Therapist, Licensed Family Therapist, State of Utah

Research Associate Professor of Physical Medicine an Rehabilitation, Utah School of Medicine

Director and Founder of the Sex and Marital Therapy Clinic, University of Utah.

Adjunct Associate Professor of Educational Psychology, University of Utah Abstract

Editor, The American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis

Advising Editor and Founding Member, Editorial Board, The Ericsonian Monograph

Referee, The Journal of Abnormal Psychology

1989 Presidential Award of Merit, American Society of Clinical Hypnosis

1990 Urban Sector Award, American Society of Clinical Hypnosis

Current President, American Society of Clinical Hypnosis




-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: The Greenbaum Speech (2/4)
``THE GREENBAUM SPEECH of D.C.HAMMOND''

We've got a lot to cover today and let me give you a rough approximate outline of the the things that I'd like us to get into. First, let me ask how many of you have had at least one course or workshop on hypnosis? Can I see the hands? Wonderful. That makes our job easier. Okay.

I want to start off by talking a little about trance-training and the use of hypnotic phenomena with an MPD dissociative-disorder population, to talk some about unconscious exploration, methods of doing that, the use of imagery and symbolic imagery techniques for managing physical symptoms, input overload, things like that. Before the day's out, I want to spend some time talking about something I think has been completely neglected in the field of dissociative disorder, and that's talking about methods of profound calming for automatic hyper-arousal that's been conditioned in these patients. We're going to spend a considerable length of time talking about age-regression and abreaction in working through a trauma. I'll show you with a non-MPD patient -- some of that kind of work -- and then extrapolate from what I find so similar and different with MPD cases. Part of that, I would add, by the way, is that I've been very sensitive through the years about taping MPD cases or ritual-abuse cases, part of it being that some of that feels a little like using patients and I think that this population has been used enough. That's part of the reason, by choice, that I don't generally videotape my work. I also want to talk a bunch about hypnotic relapse- prevention strategies and post-integration therapy today. Finally, I hope to find somewhere in our time-frame to spend on hour or so talking specifically about ritual abuse and about mind-control programming and brainwashing -- how it's done, how to get on the inside with that -- which is a topic that in the past I haven't been willing to speak about publicly, have done that in small groups and in consultations, but recently decided that it was high time that somebody started doing it. So we're going to talk about specifics today. [Applause]

In Chicago at the first international congress where ritual abuse was talked about I can remember thinking, "How strange and interesting." I can recall many people listening to an example given that somebody thought was so idiosyncratic and rare, and all the people coming up after saying, "Gee, you're treating one, too? You're in Seattle"...Well, I'm in Toronto...Well, I'm in Florida...Well, I'm in Cincinnati." I didn't know what to think at that point. It wasn't too long after that I found my first ritual-abuse patient in somebody I was already treating and we hadn't gotten that deep yet. Things in that case made me very curious about the use of mind-control techniques and hypnosis and other brainwashing techniques. So I started studying brainwashing and some of the literature in that area and became acquainted with, in fact, one of the people who'd written one of the better books in that area. Then I decided to do a survey, and from the ISSMP&D [International Society for the Study of Mulptiple Personality and Dissociation] folks I picked out about a dozen and a half therapists that I though were seeing more of that than probably anyone else around and I started surveying them. The interview protocol, that I had. got the same reaction almost without exception. Those therapists said, "You're asking questions I don't know the answers to. You're asking more specific questions than I've ever asked my patients." Many of those same therapists said, "Let me ask those questions and I'll get back to you with the answer." Many of them not only got back with answers, but said, "You've got to talk to this patient or these two patients." I ended up doing hundred of dollars worth of telephone interviewing. What I came out of that was a grasp of a variety of brainwashing methods being used all over the country.

I started to hear some similarities. Whereas I hadn't known, to begin with, how widespread things were, I was now getting a feeling that there were a lot of people reporting some similar things and that there must be some degree of communication here. Then approximately two and a half years ago I had some material drop in my lap. My source was saying a lot of things that I knew were accurate about some of the brainwashing, but it was telling me new material I had no idea about. At this point I took and decided to check it out in three ritual-abuse patients I was seeing at the time. Two of the three had what they were describing, in careful inquiry without leading or contaminating. The fascinating thing was that as I did a telephone-consult with a therapist that I'd been consulting for quite a number of months on an MPD case in another state, I told her to inquire about certain things. She said, "Well, what are those things?" I said, "I'm not going to tell you, because I don't want there to be any possibility of contamination. Just come back to me and tell me what the patient says." She called me back two hours later, said, "I just had a double session with this patient and there was a part of him that said, 'Oh, we're so excited. If you know about this stuff, you know how the Cult Programmers get on the inside and our therapy is going to go so much faster.'"

Many other patients since have had a reaction of wanting to pee their pants out of anxiety and fear rather than thinking it was wonderful thing. But the interesting thing was that she then asked, "What are these things?" They were word perfect -- same answers my source had given me. I've since repeated that in many parts of the country. I've consulted in eleven states and one foreign country, in some cases over the telephone, in some cases in person, in some cases giving the therapist information ahead of time and saying, "Be very careful how you phrase this. Phrase it in these ways so you don't contaminate." In other cases not even giving the therapist information ahead of time so they couldn't. When you start to find the same highly esoteric information in different states and different countries, from Florida to California, you start to get an idea that there's something going on that is very large, very well coordinated, with a great deal of communication and systematicness to what's happening. So I have gone from someone kind of neutral and not knowing what to think about it all to someone who clearly believes ritual abuse is real and that the people who say it isn't are either naive like people who didn't want to believe the Holocaust or -- they're dirty. [Applause]

Now for a long time I would tell a select group of therapists that I knew and trusted, information and say, "Spread it out. Don't spread my name. Don't say where it came from. But here's some information. Share it with other therapists if you find it's on target, and I'd appreciate your feedback." People would question -- in talks -- and say, you know, they were hungry for information. Myself, as well as a few others that I've shared it with, were hedging out of concern and out of personal threats and out of death threats. I finally decided to hell with them. If they're going to kill me, they're going to kill me. It's time to share more information with therapists. Part of that comes because we proceeded so cautiously and slowly, checking things in many different locations and find the same thing. So I'm going to give you the way in with ritual-abuse programming. I certainly can't tell you everything that you want to know in forty-five or fifty minutes, but I'm going to give you the essentials to get inside and start working at a new level.

I don't know what proportion, honestly, of patients have this. I would guess that maybe somewhere around at least fifty percent, maybe as high as three-quarters, I would guess maybe two-thirds of your ritual-abuse patients may have this. What do I think the distinguishing characteristic is? If they were raised from birth in a mainstream cult or if they were an non-bloodline person, meaning neither parent was in the Cult, but Cult people had a lot of access to them in early childhood, they may also have it. I have seen more than one ritual-abuse patient who clearly had all the kind of ritual things you hear about. They seemed very genuine. They talked about all the typical things that you hear in this population, but had none of this programming with prolonged extensive checking. So I believe in one case I was personally treating that she was a kind of schizmatic break-off that had kind of gone off and done their own thing and were no longer hooked into a mainstream group. [Pause]

Here's where it appears to have come from. At the end of World War II, before it even ended, Allen Dulles and people from our Intelligence Community were already in Switzerland making contact to get out Nazi scientists. As World War II ends, they not only get out rocket scientists, but they also get out some Nazi doctors who have been doing mind-control research in the camps.

They brought them to the United States. Along with them was a young boy, a teenager, who had been raised in a Hasidic Jewish tradition and a background of Cabalistic mysticism that probably appealed to people in the Cult because at least by the turn of the century Aleister Crowley had been introducing Cabalism into Satanic stuff, if not earlier. I suspect it may have formed some bond between them. But he saved his skin by collaborating and being an assistant to them in the death-camp experiments. They brought him with them. They started doing mind-control research for Military Intelligence in military hospitals in the United States. The people that came, the Nazi doctors, were Satanists. Subsequently, the boy changed his name, Americanized it some, obtained an M.D. degree, became a physician and continued this work that appears to be at the center of Cult Programming today. His name is known to patients throughout the country. [Pause] What they basically do is they will get a child and they will start this, in basic forms, it appears, by about two and a half after the child's already been made dissociative. They'll make him dissociative not only through abuse, like sexual abuse, but also things like putting a mousetrap on their fingers and teaching the parents, "You do not go in until the child stops crying. Only then do you go in and remove it." They start in rudimentary forms at about two and a half and kick into high gear, it appears, around six or six and a half, continue through adolescence with periodic reinforcements in adulthood. Basically in the programming the child will be put typically on a gurney. They will have an IV in one hand or arm. They'll be strapped down, typically naked. There'll be wires attached to their head to monitor electroencephalograph patterns. They will see a pulsing light, most often described as red, occasionally white or blue. They'll be given, most commonly I believe, Demerol. Sometimes it'll be other drugs as well depending on the kind of programming. They have it, I think, down to a science where they've learned you give so much every twenty-five minutes until the programming is done. They then will describe a pain on one ear, their right ear generally, where it appears a needle has been placed, and they will hear weird, disorienting sounds in that ear while they see photic stimulation to drive the brain into a brainwave pattern with a pulsing light at a certain frequency not unlike the goggles that are now available through Sharper Image and some of those kinds of stores. Then, after a suitable period when they're in a certain brainwave state, they will begin programming, programming oriented to self-destruction and debasement of the person.

In a patient at this point in time about eight years old who has gone through a great deal early programming took place on a military installation. That's not uncommon. I've treated and been involved with cases who are part of this original mind-control project as well as having their programming on military reservations in many cases. We find a lot of connections with the CIA. This patient now was in a Cult school, a private Cult school where several of these sessions occurred a week. She would go into a room, get all hooked up. They would do all of these sorts of things. When she was in the proper altered state, now they were no longer having to monitor it with electroencephalographs, she also had already had placed on her electrodes, one in the vagina, for example, four on the head. Sometimes they'll be on other parts of the body. They will then begin and they would say to her, "You are angry with someone in the group." She'd say, "No, I'm not" and they'd violently shock her. They would say the same thing until she complied and didn't make any negative response. Then they would continue. "And because you are angry with someone in the group," or "When you are angry with someone in the group, you will hurt yourself. Do you understand?" She said, "No" and they shocked her. They repeated again, "Do you understand?" "Well, yes, but I don't want to." Shock her again untill they get compliance. Then they keep adding to it. "And you will hurt yourself by cutting yourself. Do you understand?" Maybe she'd say yes, but they might say, "We don't believe you" and shock her anyway. "Go back and go over it again." They would continue in this sort of fashion. She said typically it seemed as though they'd go about thirty minutes, take a break for a smoke or something, come back. They may review what they'd done and stopped or they might review what they'd done and go on to new material. She said the sessions might go half an hour, they might go three hours. She estimated three times a week.

Programming under the influence of drugs in a certain brainwave state and with these noises in one ear and them speaking in the other ear, usually the left ear, associated with right hemisphere non-dominant brain functioning, and with them talking, therefore, and requiring intense concentration, intense focusing. Because often they'll have to memorize and say certain things back, word-perfect, to avoid punishment, shock, and other kinds of things that are occurring. This is basically how a lot of programming goes on. Some of it'll also use other typical brainwashing kinds of techniques. There will be very standardized types of hypnotic things done at times. There'll be sensory deprivation which we know increases suggestibility in anyone. Total sensory deprivation, suggestibility has significantly increased, from the research. It's not uncommon for them to use a great deal of that, including formal sensory-deprivation chambers before they do certain of these things.

[Pause] Now let me give you, because we don't have a lot of time, as much practical information as I can. The way that I would inquire as to whether or not some of this might be there would be with ideomotor finger-signals. After you've set them up I would say, "I want the central inner core of you to take control of the finger-signals." Don't ask the unconscious mind. The case where you're inquiring about ritual abuse, that's for the central inner core. The core is a Cult-created part. "And I want that central inner core of you to take control of this hand of these finger-signals and what it has for the yes-finger to float up. I want to ask the inner core of you is there any part of you, any part of Mary," that's the host's name, "who knows anything about Alpha, Beta, Delta, or Theta." If you get a Yes, it should raise a red flag that you might have someone with formal intensive brainwashing and programming in place. I would then ask and say, "I want a part inside who knows something about Alpha, Beta, Delta, and Theta to come up to a level where you can speak to me and when you're here say, 'I'm here.'" I would not ask if a part was willing to. No one's going to particularly want to talk about this. I would just say, "I want some part who can tell me about this to come out." Without leading them ask them what these things are. I've had consults where I've come in. Sometimes I've gotten a Yes to that, but as I've done exploration it appeared to be some kind of compliance response or somebody wanting, in two or three cases, to appear maybe that they were ritual abuse and maybe they were in some way, but with careful inquiry and looking it was obvious that they did not have what we were looking for. Let me tell you what these are.

Let's suppose that this whole front row here are multiples and that she has an alter named Helen and she has one named Mary, she has one named Gertrude, she has one named Elizabeth, and she has one named Monica. Every one of those alters may have put on it a program, perhaps designated alpha-zero-zero-nine a Cult person could say, "Alpha-zero-zero-nine" or make some kind of hand gesture to indicate this and get the same part out in any one of them even though they had different names that they may be known by to you. Alphas appear to represent general programming, the first kind of things put in. Betas appear to be sexual programs. For example, how to perform oral sex in a certain way, how to perform sex in rituals, having to do with producing child pornography, directing child pornography, prostitution. Deltas are killers trained in how to kill in ceremonies. There'll also be some self-harm stuff mixed in with that, assassination and killing. Thetas are called psychic killers. You know, I had never in my life heard those two terms paired together. I'd never heard the words "psychic killers" put together, but when you have people in different states, including therapists inquiring and asking, "What is Theta," and patients say to them, "Psychic killers," it tends to make one a believer that certain things are very systematic and very widespread. This comes from their belief in psychic sorts of abilities and powers, including their ability to psychically communicate with "mother'" including their ability to psychically cause somebody to develop a brain aneurysm and die. It also is a more future-oriented kind of programming. Then there's Omega. I usually don't include that word when I say my first question about this or any part inside that knows about Alpha, Beta, Delta, Theta because Omega will shake them even more. Omega has to do with self-destruct programming. Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end. This can include self-mutilation as well as killing-themselves programming. Gamma appears to be system-protection and deception programming which will provide misinformation to you, try to misdirect you, tell you half-truths, protect different things inside. There can also be other Greek letters. I'd recommend that you go and get your entire Greek alphabet and if you have verified that some of this stuff is present and they have given you some of the right answers about what some of this material is, and I can't underline enough: DO NOT LEAD THEM. Do not say, "Is this killers?" Get the answer from them, please. When you've done this and it appears to be present, I would take your entire Greek alphabet and, with ideomotor signals, go through the alphabet and say, "Is there any programming inside associated with epsilon, omicron," and go on through. There may be some sytematicness to some of the other letter, but I'm not aware of it.

Now there are many different layers of this stuff is the problem. Let me come over to the overhead and give some ideas about them. What we have up here are innumerable alters. I'll tell you one of the fascinating things I've seen. I remember a little over a year ago coming in to see some cases, some of the tough cases at a dissociative-disorders unit of a couple of the finest of the MPD therapists in this country, who are always part of all the international meetings, have lectured internationally. We worked and I look at some of their patients. They were amazed at certain things because they had not been aware of this before. As we worked with some of the patients and confirmed it, I remember one woman who'd been inpatient for three years, still was inpatient. Another who had one intensive year of inpatient work with all the finest MPD therapy you can imagine -- abreactions, integrations, facilitating cooperation, art therapy, on and on and on, journaling, intensively for one inpatient year followed by an intensive year of outpatient therapy two, three hours a week. In both patients we found out that all of this great work had done nothing but deal with the alters up here and had not touched the mind-control programming. In fact it was not only intact, but we found that the one who was outpatient was having her therapy monitored every session by her mother, out-of-state, over the telephone, and that she still had intact suggestions that had been given to her at a certain future time to kill her therapist. Now one of the things that I would very carefully check is, I would suggest that you ask the core, not just the unconscious mind, ask the core, "Is there any part inside that continues to have contact with people associated with the Cult? Is there any part inside who goes to Cult rituals or meetings? Is there a recording device inside of Mary," if that's the host's name, "a recording device inside so that someone can find out the things that are said in sessions?" This doesn't mean they're monitored. Many of them just simply have it. "Is there someone who debriefs some part inside for what happens in our therapy sessions?" I have the very uncomfortable feeling from some past experience that when you look at this you will find the large proportion of ritual-abuse victims in this country are having their ongoing therapy monitored.

I remember a woman who came in about twenty-four years old, claimed her father was a Satanist. Her parents divorced when she was six. After that it would only when her father had visitation and he would take her to rituals sometimes up until age fifteen. She said, "I haven't gone to anything since I was fifteen." Her therapist believed this at face value. We sat in my office. We did a two-hour inquiry using hypnosis. We found the programming present. In addition to that we found that every therapy session was debriefed and in fact they had told her to get sick and not come to the appointment with me. Another one had been told that I was Cult and that if she came I would know that she'd been told not to come and I would punish her. If anything meaningful comes out in a patient who's being monitored like that -- from what I've learned thus far, they're tortured with electric shocks -- my belief is if they're in that situation you can't do meaningful therapy other than being supportive and caring and letting them know you care a lot and you'll be there to support them. But I wouldn't try to work with any kind of deep material or deprogramming with them because I think it can do nothing but get them tortured and hurt unless they can get into a safe, secure inpatient unit for an extended period of time to do some of the work required. I have a feeling that when you make inquiries you're going to find that probably greater than fifty percent of these patients, if they're bloodline, meaning mother or dad or both involved, will be monitored on some ongoing basis. [Pause]

Now when you come below the alters, you then have Alpha, Beta, Delta, Theta, so and so forth, the Greek-letter programming and they will then have backup programs. There will typically be an erasure code for the backups. There may be one code that combines all the backups into one and then an erasure code for them, simply one code that erases all the backups. So I will get the code for, let's say, Omega and for all the Omega backups at the same time. After I've asked "What will happen if I give this," I will give the code and then I will say, "What are you experiencing?" They often describe computer whirring, things erasing, explosions inside, all sorts of interesting things. I've had some therapists come back and say, "My Lord, I had never said anything about robots she said something about robots vaporizing." I remember one therapist who'd been with me in several hypnosis workshops and consulted with me about a crisis MPD situation. I told her to inquire about Alpha, Beta, Delta, Theta. She did. She got back to me saying, "Yeah, I got an indication it's there. What is it?" I said, "I'm not going to tell you. Go back and inquire about some of this." We set an appointment for a week or so hence. She got back with me and said, "I asked what Theta was and she said, 'psychic killers.' I asked her what Delta was and she said 'killers.'" Okay. So I told her about some of this stuff for a two-hour consult. She called back and she said, "This seemed too fantastic. I heard this and I thought, 'Has Cory been working too hard?'" she said, I'm embarrassed to admit it, but she said, "I held you in high professional regard, but this just sounded so off in the twilight zone that I really thought, 'Is he having a nervous breakdown or something?'" She said, "But I respected you enough to ask about this." She said, "I asked another MPD patient and she didn't have any of this." So in this patient she started describing things and how she worked, for example, with an erasure and she was describing things like robots vaporizing and kinds of things. She said, "I hadn't told her about any of these things." Well, here's the problem. There are different layers and I think some of them are designed to keep us going in circles forever. They figured we probably, in most cases, wouldn't get below the alters which they purposefully created.

The way you create Manchurian Candidates is you divide the mind. It's part of what the Intelligence Community wanted to look at. If you're going to get an assassin, you're going to get somebody to go do something, you divide the mind. It fascinates me about cases like the assassination of Robert Kennedy, where Bernard Diamond, on examining Sirhan Sirhan found that he had total amnesia of the killing of Robert Kennedy, but under hypnosis could remember it. But despite suggestions he would be able to consciously remember, could not remember a thing after he was out of hypnosis. I'd love to examine Sirhan Sirhan.

It appears that below this we've got some other layers. One is called "Green Programming" it appears. Isn't it interesting that the doctor's name is Dr. Green? One of the questions in a way that does not contaminate is after I've identified some of this stuff is there and they've given me a few right answers about what some of it is, "If there were a doctor associated with this programming and his name were a color, you know, like Dr. Chartreuse or something, if his name were a color, what color would the color be?" Now once in a while I've had some other colors mentioned in about three or four patients that I felt were trying to dissimulate in some way and I don't really believe had this. In one case I got another color and I found out later it was a doctor whose name was a color who was being trained by Dr. Green almost thirty years ago and he supervised part of the programming of this woman under this doctor. I remember one woman couldn't come up with anything. No alter would speak up with anything. I said, "Okay," and we went on to some other material. About two minutes later she said, "Green. Do you mean Dr. Green?" We found this all over. There appears to be some Green Programming below that and I suspect that you get down to fewer and more central programs the deeper you go. Well, all Green Programming is Ultra-Green and the Green Tree. Cabalistic mysticism is mixed all into this. If you're going to work with this you need to pick up a couple of books on the Cabala. One is by a man named Dion Fortune called "Qabala" with a "q," Dion Fortune. Another is by Ann Williams-Heller and it's called "The Kabbalah." I knew nothing about the Cabala. It was interesting. A patient had sat in my waiting area, got there considerably early and drew a detailed multicolored Cabalistic Tree over two years ago. It took me two months to figure out what it was. Finally, showing it to somebody else who said, "You know? That looks an awful lot like the Cabala Tree" and that rang a bell with some esoteric in an old book and I dug it out. That was the background of Dr. Green.

Now the interesting thing about the Green Tree is his original name was Greenbaum. What does "greenbaum" mean in German? Green Tree, Ultra-Tree and the Green Tree. I've also had patients who didn't appear to know that his original name was Greenbaum, volunteered that there were parts inside named Mr. Greenbaum. Now let me give you some information about parts inside that may be helpful to you if you're going to inquire about these things, because my experience is one part will give you some information and either run dry or get defensive or scared and stop. And so you punt and you make an end run and you come around the other direction, you find another part. I'll tell you several parts to ask for and ask if there's a part by this name. And, by the way, when I'm screening patients and fiddling around with this, I throw in a bunch of spurious ones and ask, "Is there a part inside by this name and by that name" as a check on whether or not it appears genuine. For example. "In addition to the core," I ask, "is there a part inside named Wisdom?" Wisdom is a part of the Cabalistic Tree. Wisdom, I've often found, will be helpful and give you a lot of information. "Is there a part inside named Diana?" I mean I may throw in all sorts of things. "Is there a part inside named Zelda?" I've never encountered one yet! Just to see what kind of answers we get. I try to do this carefully. Diana is a part that, in the Cabalistic system, is associated with a part called the Foundation. You will be fascinated to know that. Remember the Process Church? Roman Polanski's wife, Sharon Tate, was killed by the Manson Family who were associated with the Process Church? A lot of prominent people in Hollywood were associated and then they went underground, the books say, in about seventy-eight and vanished? Well, they're alive and well in southern Utah. We have a thick file in the Utah Department of Public Safety documenting that they moved to southern Utah, north of Monument Valley, bought a movie ranch in the desert, renovated it, expanded it, built a bunch of buildings there, carefully monitored so that very few people go out of there and no one can get in and changed their name. A key word in their name is "Foundation." The Foundation. There are some other words. The Foundation is part of the Tree. So you can ask, "Is there something inside known as The Foundation?" I might ask other things to throw people off. "Is there something known as the Sub- Basement?" Well, maybe they'll conceive of something. Or "Is there something known as the Walls?" There are a variety of questions you can come up with, to sort of screen some things. I've also found that there will often be a part called "Black Master," a part called "Master Programmer," and that there will be computer operators inside. How many of you have come into computer things in patients? There will typically be computer operators: Computer Operator Black, Computer Operator Green, Computer Operator Purple. Sometimes they'll have numbers instead, sometimes they'll be called Systems Information Directors. You can find out the head one of those. There'll be a source of some information for you. I will ask inside, "Is there a part inside named Dr. Green?" You'll find that there are, if they have this kind of programming, in my experience. Usually with a little work and reframing, you can turn them and help them to realize that they were really a child-part who's playing a role and they had no choice then, but they do now. You know, they played their role very, very well, but they don't have to continue to play it with you because they're safe here and in fact, "If the Cult simply found out that you talked to me, that they you had shared information with me, you tell me what would they do to you?" Emphasize that the only way out is through me and that they need to cooperate and share information and help me and that I'll help them. So all these parts can give you various information.

Now they have tried to protect this very carefully. Let me give you an example with Ultra-Green. I discovered this -- by the way I used to think this programming was only in bloodline people. I've discovered it in non-bloodline people, but it's a bit different. They don't want it to be just the same. I don't think you'll find deep things like Ultra-Green and probably not even Green Programming with non-bloodline people. But let me tell you something that I discovered first in a non-bloodline and then in a bloodline. We were going along and a patient was close to getting well, approaching final integration in a non-bloodline and she suddenly started hallucinating and her fingers were becoming hammers and other things like that. So I used an affect-bridge and we went back and we found that what happened was that they gave suggestions, that if she ever got well to a certain point she would go crazy. The way they did this was they strapped her down and they gave her LSD when she was eight years old. When she began hallucinating they inquired about the nature of the hallucinations so they could utilize them in good Ericsonian fashion and build on them and then combine the drug-effect with powerful suggestions. "If you ever get to this point you will go crazy. If you ever get fully integrated and get well you will go crazy like this and will be locked up in an institution for the rest of your life. They gave those suggestions vigorously and repetitively. Finally they introduced other suggestions that, "Rather than have this happen, it would be easier to just kill yourself." In a bloodline patient then, as I began inquiring about deep material, the patient started to experience similar symptoms. We went back and we found the identical things were done to her.

This was called the "Green Bomb." B-O-M-B. Lots of interesting internal consistencies like that play on words with Dr. Greenbaum, his original name. Now in this case it was done to her at age nine for the first time and then only hers was different. Hers was a suggestion for amnesia. "If you ever remember anything about Ultra-Green and the Green Tree you will go crazy. You will become a vegetable and be locked up forever." Then finally the suggestion's added, "And it'll be easier to just kill yourself than have that happen to you, if you ever remember it." At age twelve then, three years later, they used what sounds like an Amytol interview to try to breach the amnesia and find out if they could. They couldn't. So then they strapped her down again, took and gave her something to kind of paralyze her body, gave her LSD, an even bigger dose and reinforced all the suggestions. Did a similar thing at the age of sixteen. So these are some of the kind of booby traps you run into. There are a number of cases where they combined powerful drug effects like this with suggestions to keep us from discovering some of this deeper level stuff. What's the bottom?

Your guess is as good as mine but I can tell you that I've had a lot of therapists who were stymied with these cases who were going nowhere. In fact someone here that I told some basic information about this to in Ohio a couple of months ago said it opened all sorts of things up in a patient who'd been going nowhere. That's an often common thing. I think that we can move down to deeper levels and if we deal with some of the deeper level stuff it may destroy all the stuff above it. But we don't even know that yet. In some of the patients I'm working with we have pretty much dealt with a lot of the top-level stuff. I'll tell you how we've done some of that. We'll take and erase one system like Omega. Then we will have a huge abreaction of all the memories and feelings in a fractionated abreaction associated with those parts. I typically find I'll say to them, "Now that we've done this are there any other memories and feelings that any parts that were Omega still have?" The answer's usually "No." At that point I will say, "I usually find at this point in time the majority, if not all, of those parts that used to be Omega no longer feel a desire or need to be different, realizing that you split off originally by them and want to go home to Mary and become one with her again." I use the concept often now -- which came from a patient -- of going home and becoming one with her. "Going back from whence you came" is another phrase I'll use with them. "Are there any Omega parts inside who do not feel comfortable with that or have reservations or concerns about that?" If there are we talk to them. We deal with them. A few may not integrate. My experience is most of the time they'll integrate and we may integrate twenty-five parts at once in a polyfragmented complex MPD. I think it is vitally important to abreact the feelings before you go on. Also for many patients it hasn't seemed to matter the order we go in but I've found a couple where it has. If it doesn't seem to matter I'll typically go Omega, then Delta because they have more violence potential, then Gamma to get rid of the self-deception stuff. What I will do before I just assume anything and do that, is once we've done Omega and showed them that success can occur and something can happen and they feel relief after, I will say to them, "I want to ask the core -- through the fingers -- is there a specific order in which programs must be erased?" You know maybe it doesn't matter but most of the time I found "No." There are cases where we found "Yes." I recommend doing one or two or three of those because they'll produce relief and and a sense of optimism in the patient. But then I would recommend starting to probe for the deeper level things and getting their input and recommendations about the order in which we go.

Question? Q: What has been the typical age and typical gender of this type of person? Dr.H: I know of this being found in men and women. Most of the patients I know with MPD ritual abuse that are being treated are women, however. I know of some men being treated where we've found this. A while back I was talking to a small group of therapists somewhere. I told them about some of this. In the middle of talking about some of this all the color drained out of one social worker's face and she obviously had a reaction and I asked her about and she said, "I'm working with a five-year-old boy," and she said, "Just in the last few weeks he was saying something about a Dr. Green."

Subject: The Greenbaum Speech (4/4) ^Repost^

Q: It seems to me that there seems to be some similarity between these kinds of programming and those people who claim that they've been abducted by spaceships and have had themselves physically probed and reprogrammed and all of that sort of thing. Since Cape Canaveral is across the Florida peninsula from me and I don't think that they've reported any spaceships lately, I was just wondering is there any sort of relationship between this and that?

Dr.H: I'll share my speculation, that comes from others really. I've not dealt with any of those people. However, I know a therapist that I know and trust and respect who I've informed about all this a couple of years ago and has found it in a lot of patients and so on, who is firmly of the belief that those people are in fact ritual-abuse victims who have been programmed with that sort of thing to destroy all their credibility. If somebody's coming in and reporting abduction by a flying sauce who's going to believe them on anything else in the future? Also as a kind of thing that can be pointed to and said, "This is as ridiculous as that." All I know is that I recently had a consult, a telephone consult, with a therapist where I had been instructing her about some of this kind of stuff. When we were consulting at one point in the fifth or sixth interview she said, "By the way, do you know anything about this topic?" I said, "Well, not really" and shared with her what I shared with you. I said, "If it were me being with this guy..." that she'd been seeing for a couple of months, I said, "I would ask inside for the core to take control of finger-signals and inquire about Alpha, Beta, Delta, Theta." She proceeded to do all that, got back to me a week later and said, "Boy, were you on target. There is a part inside named Dr. Green. There's this kind of programming."
 

alchemike

Veteran Member
pedophile sting nets 50 cops...

for those who've been following this thread, this story may connect a few dots...

are you getting an idea of how pervasive this problem is yet???

i maintain...expose the pedophiles and you solve many other problems simply by association...

we just have to stop pretending it isn't happening...

in all of your respective prayers, i sure hope you pray for the protection of children...all children, everywhere...

the kids are all that really matter anyway...or have we forgotten that, too???

o)<

mike

http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/crime/story.jsp?story=362597

Raids on paedophile porn suspects net 50 police officers
By Ian Burrell Home Affairs Correspondent
18 December 2002

Scotland Yard detectives raided homes across London yesterday as part of an investigation into child pornography internet sites that has led to the arrest of 1,300 suspected paedophiles, including 50 police officers.

The raids were the largest single operation in a nation-wide police trawl and led to 34 further arrests. British police are investigating up to 7,000 suspected child pornography users identified by the American authorities as having accessed "pay-per-view" sites.

Senior officers said the investigation, named Operation Ore, was under-resourced but was concentrating on the suspects believed to represent the greatest threat to children.

Jim Gamble, an Assistant Chief Constable at the National Crime Squad, said: "Fifty police officers have been identified and we are not hiding that fact. We want you to know about that to reassure you. Police officers are members of the communities that they serve and there will be good people and bad people in the police."

Mr Gamble said eight of the police officers had been charged and the remainder had been given bail pending further inquiries.

Among the police officers who have been arrested are two Cambridgeshire officers who were involved in the inquiry into the murders of the Soham schoolgirls Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman. Detective Constable Brian Stevens, 41, a family liaison officer to Jessica's parents, and PC Anthony Goodridge, 34, an exhibits officer on the inquiry, were arrested in September.

Others arrested in the Operation Ore investigation include a senior Customs and Excise official, a PE teacher and an Army cadets officer.

In London alone, 28 children identified as being at risk of being abused have been placed with care agencies.

Deputy Assistant Commissioner Carole Howlett, of the Metropolitan Police, said yesterday's raids, which involved 250 officers, represented the single largest operation of its kind mounted by the force.

Ms Howlett said the Home Office had agreed to allocate an extra £500,000 to support further action as part of Operation Ore. She said the money would be used to provide extra training in computer forensics for officers across the country and to buy equipment to assist in analysing the computers already seized. The first arrests under Operation Ore were made in May this year.

Ms Howlett said the forensic analysis of computer equipment was an extremely lengthy process and some forces, lacking resources, faced a backlog of up to nine months.

"The Home Office funding is going to go a significant way in terms of training and building up the expertise across the forces," she added.

Operation Ore is the UK response to a huge FBI investigation which traced 250,000 paedophiles worldwide last year through credit card details used to pay for downloading child porn.

The names of British suspects were passed on by investigators in the United States. Suspects were traced through the Landslide website – a gateway to an international collection of child pornography sites.

Thomas Reedy, who ran the website and earned millions of dollars from it, is now serving several life sentences in the United States.

The children's charity NSPCC said it had been assisting the Met by responding to any emerging child protection matters. Colin Turner, head of NSPCC's specialist investigation service, said: "The arrests send out a strong warning to those that think they can remain anonymous and escape the law by using the internet to trade in child abuse images. Behind these indecent, abusive images are real children who will have suffered immense damage and trauma."
 

Walrus Whisperer

Hope in chains...
As a victim of rape(ex husband-one of the many reasons he is an Ex) and molestation by my own brother, I KNOW all this. Trouble is, no one wants to talk about it. the normalizing of this kind of heinous activity makes me want to puke.:kk2: and rip their gonads out:bg:
A child cannot consent.
A CHILD CANNOT CONSENT.


And read "When Rabbit Howls". You'll want to burn it when you're through. And scrub your skin till it hurts to get the awful taint off.
 

PresterJohn

Inactive
How many people here give silent assent to sex under 18?

IMHO it's rape.

If the age of maturity used by the government is 18, then sex under this age is rape and should be procecuted as such.

Why is it that sex between an adult male and a teenage male is abhorrent, but sex between an adult male and a teenage girl is viewed as ok. For me. it screams abuse.

There still is an old boys club.

--Pj--
 
Top