EDUC Competition, The American Way (vocational training)

Plain Jane

Just Plain Jane

Competition, The American Way​


BY TYLER DURDEN
FRIDAY, APR 26, 2024 - 10:20 PM
Authored by Jack Miller via RealClearEducation,
Our K-12 educational system is designed to serve much less than 50% of American students.

For decades the cry has been that “all kids must go to college.” Yet, only a minority do so and fewer graduate.

Our high schools have been turned into college prep schools. Shop classes have been eliminated, along with other useful courses. Most students who don’t go to college have been deprived of the education they need to be successful. And businesses looking for hungry, well-prepared personnel have been deprived of good candidates.

A 2022 report from American Compass suggests that “for every young American on the idealized path, there are ten who never enroll in college or else fail to complete a degree.” Various studies show different percentages, but all show that most students don’t complete, or even enter, college. Studies also show that fewer young people are even applying to college.

This is a real, self-imposed crisis. It also has a major impact on many of those in poorer circumstances or who get bored with college prep courses and drop out of school before graduating.

Given this well-documented reality, why has our K-12 education system not reformed itself to address this glaring problem?

Once you understand the problem, it is not difficult to figure out how to fix it. In the K-8 system, every student should be taught the basics: reading, writing, and arithmetic, plus some civics and history to start them on the road to being good citizens.

When students get to high school, they should be offered a two-track program. Keep the college prep program going for those who want to go on to postsecondary education. Also, another track should be introduced for the majority who don’t plan to go to college.

In addition to the basics such as English, history, civics, and a few others, students should have the option to take various kinds of vocation-based classes that teach the skills that are needed in the job market. We should be preparing all our young people to be good citizens, but also for good-paying jobs that don’t require a college degree.

Then, we need to strengthen our trade schools, the community college system, and internships, which would further prepare these young people to be successful in their careers. During the four to six years others are spending in college, young adults who take this track would be able to work and earn money instead of accumulating debt. In many cases they could make as much, or even more, than many college graduates.

The benefits of creating a two-track system would be immense. First, we could expand our labor pool quite a bit. Our country is facing a labor shortage. The birth rate has been down for a number of years, so fewer young people are entering the workforce, and an increasing number of people are retiring. Our immigration policies are not allowing enough skilled labor into the country.

The answer to these problems is to tap into that large, untrained, unmotivated pool of talent our schools are leaving behind. Doing so would have many benefits, both for the individuals and for the country.

For the individuals, it would provide them with a good middle-class, or higher, lifestyle. It would give them a sense of pride, of accomplishment. It would keep many of them from committing crimes and staying out of jail, and it would lead to much happier lives.

For the country, it would provide a large pool of trained workers. It would add to our gross national product. It would reduce the amount of money we spend on law enforcement and incarceration. It would prevent the enormous waste that results from theft and other crimes.

For a great many jobs, a two-year certificate from a community college or additional trade school training is all that may be needed to get a good start in a career. And, from there, meritocracy determines the rest.

This project should be taken on by the states. Education is a state responsibility and should not wait for the federal government to shoulder this responsibility. The fastest, most efficient method is for the states to act now.

Of course, those states that do act would be creating the best-trained workforces and would be growing their economies and attracting businesses. A little competition, the American way, is always a good thing.
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
John Dewey John Dewey - Wikipedia

Education, for Dewey, is not only about gaining theoretical knowledge but also getting practical experience. He viewed education from a holistic perspective whereby learning is seen as a continuous process that combines knowledge with life experiences and encourages students to integrate thinking skills with tangible results. This view of education ensures students have significant experiences which are internally meaningful and contribute to their growth as learners.

Owner has showed me a picture of his grandmother who attended Bridgewater (MA) State Teachers College in 1916 (and has a hall named after Dewey)

In the picture his grandmother is working a lathe and making parts for a 1903 Springfield Rifle - this apparently done under a collegiate Dewey program started to support making arms for the First World War, and which the primarily female "Teaching School" was doing as their part for the upcoming war.

This in long skirts and all.

"Learn by doing" is directly from Dewey.

Owner should he see this OP would say "There is nothing new under the sun."

Dobbin
 

WalknTrot

Veteran Member
That's exactly what we had when I went to Jr. high and high school. If I remember correctly, we all had to take boy's shop or girl's home ec., general science, biology, and math up through algebra and geometry in 8th grade, after that, people branched out. Most kids didn't take physics, chem, trig and calc. Didn't even take advanced writing or history electives. BUT, they were the ones who took accounting, typing, drafting, mechanics, languages, and were involved in business classes and the after-school occupational branch clubs.

Haha...and that's why I'm a two finger hunt and peck typist to this day! Before computers, "STEM" track (a term not invented 'til 20 years later) "didn't need to type. You'll have secretaries to do that stuff". Boy did that turn out to bite in spades. :lol:
 
Last edited:

Lone_Hawk

Resident Spook
I know that it was planned long before, but the big push to change the country happened under the Bill Clinton Presidency. That is when it was formally announced and implemented that ours was an "information" economy and that those low level scut jobs would be exported to help poor 3rd world economies.

Before then our mothers and fathers taught us many basic skills, and there was specialized training in our schools. My Dad made sure that I was a jack of all trades, and a master of some, before I was 14.
 

bbbuddy

DEPLORABLE ME
John Dewey John Dewey - Wikipedia



Owner has showed me a picture of his grandmother who attended Bridgewater (MA) State Teachers College in 1916 (and has a hall named after Dewey)

In the picture his grandmother is working a lathe and making parts for a 1903 Springfield Rifle - this apparently done under a collegiate Dewey program started to support making arms for the First World War, and which the primarily female "Teaching School" was doing as their part for the upcoming war.

This in long skirts and all.

"Learn by doing" is directly from Dewey.

Owner should he see this OP would say "There is nothing new under the sun."

Dobbin
This is all nice and much the way it used to be, BUT it assumes your "leaders" are looking for a prosperous successful society, not trying to bring it down for the satanic ones.
 

Plain Jane

Just Plain Jane
Shop classes have been eliminated, along with other useful courses. M
The major reason these classes were eliminated was because of the huge increase in behavioral disabilities that started in the 90s. School districts could not afford the liability insurance for that. And Federal law mandates that these students be mainstreamed.

The author doesn't address that.
 

bbbuddy

DEPLORABLE ME
The major reason these classes were eliminated was because of the huge increase in behavioral disabilities that started in the 90s. School districts could not afford the liability insurance for that. And Federal law mandates that these students be mainstreamed.

The author doesn't address that.
The purposeful downhill slide started long before the 90s.
 
Top