POL A Fearless Leader .. Now You Know Why I Support Sarah Palin for President in 2012

Be honest after what Sarah Palin has been through ... Stronger than ever ... How many politicians would withstand the Media Blitzkrieg like she did ... her enemies & spineless wonders in the GOP remained silent leaving her for dead … very few if any … No, Palin being not only the brilliant political strategist but a military one counterattacked ... Perfect timing (Gen. MacArthur would be proud of her) with her video … just like when she used two words before ... “Death Panels” … Using “Blood Libel” (Althought both times correct) Got her enemies in the MSM to fall for the bait … they gave her video massive “Free” exposure which drove the masses to view it … perhaps watching in its entirety … thus getting the full context of her message … unfiltered by the MSM out … again brilliant … Sadness for the victims, individual not collective responsibility, 1st Amendment protected free speech … America’s strengths … The release early in the morning also allowed people time to watch & compare her to the predictable Bamster circus in Tucson …They had the concession stands opened at a memorial selling popcorn & soda .. had the tee-shirts on the seats which were a theme he used in his 2008 Presidential campaign .. the medicine man … cheering ... Now you see why I support Sarah Palin for President in 2012 …


FYI … even Michael Savage a staunch critic of Palin often making crass remarks about her admitted after watching her video that he may be wrong & may be Presidential material

Here is link to Savage’s remarks about Palin video



P.S. for you Pawlenty supporters notice he came out the other day saying he would reinstate Don’t Ask Don’t tell. Notice no criticism from the MSM or Dems … You know why … they want him to be the nominee... Easy pickings for Obama.

Yeah

et2 said:

Click to expand...

Check out his co-hosts body language …. Oh please believe us …. She is a quitter …. They are truly scraping the bottom of the barrel. Oh even for MSNBC this is so lame.

Why do you look beyond the obvious and factual evidence?

Pandora's Box Indeed

This guy is a Liberal, staunch critic of Palin & this honest assessment came from of all places CBS. He says it was remarkable. Here is a link to the video of his remarks

With the CBS news guy and Savage giving positive reviews of the remarks of Governor Sarah Palin, she ,again, has won the day and set the agenda.
I enjoy watching and hearing her speak, it brightens up a winter day.
SS

Let's see, SP had 28 ethics complaints filed against her, the 28th upheld by the courts stating that her legal counsel has misled her...cost her about $400,000.

This was after she resigned.

Before she resigned, the Word on the Street was the ethics complaints had cost the State of Alaska about $2 million to investigate, her legal cost $600,000+ (when she asked for help from friends, she got nailed with another ethics complaint and I think that is the one that stuck) and of course tied up her time so she could not perform her public duties.

So she resigned.

A Pit Bull would have hung in there, cost the State $4,000,000, had a dearth of governing because she was in court all the time and gone into the tank for a million or so of personal wealth.

I will take the resignation. Cheaper all the way around.

One word... "John McCain"...

I Sara Palin support John McCain for president.

I endorse John McCain & his friend Lindsay Graham's agenda of ammnesty and bailouts so much that I want to be his running mate...

That ended it for me...

If Palin had not supported and ran on the ticket with McCain I might have considered her, but after that, I view her as nothing but an opportunist with no core values at all. She'll ride whoever's coat tails she needs to get elected(McCain, Teaparty, etc).

What The Bamster Should Have Done

In the internet age … the information age ... took what about an hour looking this guy up that most likely he was a nut & acting alone and (Which is the case, hell he was stalking Giffords back in 2007 …) I am sure Obama & his advisors knew this. So he should have done two things IMHO:

1. When he gave his statement Saturday the day of the shootings to the nation …Tell the MSM, his party, local hacks like the Sheriff (I think his remarks came after Obama’s statement which makes my point …), the Left to cool it with the blame game in particular regarding Sarah Palin ... His chief agonists (Notice what Palin said during her video “… President Obama and I may not agree on everything, but I know he would join me in affirming the health of our democratic process …”.) Perfect Sarah


2. Do not go to the Tucson Memorial … Don’t go to any memorials … keep your distance to avoid the perception of using it for political gain or if you must hold one in Tucson with just the family members, victims in a Church or small indoor gathering area. No MSM, no live or taped video, No audio, cell phones. no media inside, no pictures… very low public profile … keep them away … Then go back to D.C. in silence … no comments when back in D.C. just keep yourself quiet, somber mood away from the MSM.


If the Bamster would have done that … would have been Presidential … he would have rebounded … would have been a game changer for him … No Palin Video … No game changing ... Presidential moment for Sarah Palin ... but being who he is well ….sad for our country

It isn't Palin's so-called enemies that bother me. They're a given, a known quantity, perennial enemies of freedom.

It's her "friends" (like Henry Kissinger, and of course John McCain) that bother me. Enough with the globalist one-worlders already... how about someone who puts America first for once?

dd

et2 said:

Why do you look beyond the obvious and factual evidence?



View attachment 82673

Click to expand...

Oh, for Pete's sake, find a new, equally stupid mantra. You know exactly why she quit.

You really need to stop sucking on that worn out tit. The milk has long soured, and you're still at it, slurping away, making a fool of yourself.

Dozdoats said:

It isn't Palin's so-called enemies that bother me. They're a given, a known quantity, perennial enemies of freedom.

It's her "friends" (like Henry Kissinger, and of course John McCain) that bother me. Enough with the globalist one-worlders already... how about someone who puts America first for once?

dd

Click to expand...

This is my problem with Sarah Palin. + 1000

Dozdoats said:

It isn't Palin's so-called enemies that bother me. They're a given, a known quantity, perennial enemies of freedom.

It's her "friends" (like Henry Kissinger, and of course John McCain) that bother me. Enough with the globalist one-worlders already... how about someone who puts America first for once?

dd

Click to expand...

Yep.

Also- these perceived "enemies" are all part of the same game. When they are praising Palin, it's time to recognize that dirty liberals and neocons are all playing the same game.

Dozdoats said:

It isn't Palin's so-called enemies that bother me. They're a given, a known quantity, perennial enemies of freedom.

It's her "friends" (like Henry Kissinger, and of course John McCain) that bother me. Enough with the globalist one-worlders already... how about someone who puts America first for once?

dd

Click to expand...

I haven't read any of her books and am not a member of her inner circle and cannot phantom what's in her heart let alone my own... so how do we know she's friends with Kissinger? Aside from the one photo I've seen of them together, and the look on her face says "get your filthy hands off of me you worn out old sock". I haven't seen or read anything that these two are the best of buds. I mean do they go camping and hunting together? Share spa days together??? What evidence do we have except for what Sorcha Faal and the looney left pukes out?

K-

If you are a governor of a fairly backwoods state and have limited exposure to world politics, whether you like him or not, you can learn a lot from a days worth of conversation with Kissinger.
Sarah Palin did an excellent job while she was governor. She was grabbed by McCain because of her record and because he thought she could help him in a clearly hopeless campaign. She did, 10 of thousands of people turned out to hear her where ever she went. McCains group was embarrassed because she usually got more attention than he did.
Democrats and almost all RINO republicans do not like her and that alone is a strong recommendation for me.
During her brief time as a Vice Presidential candidate she stuck a chord with the everyday American. The Dems hated this and the Repubs feared this.
It's time for a common everyday American to become President. I have had it with Lawyers and doctors and elitists in general.

McShame .. No win situation for Her

Dozdoats said:

It isn't Palin's so-called enemies that bother me. They're a given, a known quantity, perennial enemies of freedom.

It's her "friends" (like Henry Kissinger, and of course John McCain) that bother me. Enough with the globalist one-worlders already... how about someone who puts America first for once?

dd

Click to expand...

Come ‘on he picked her to be his VP … She HAD to "Endorse" ... Go to Arizonian to "Campaign” for him ... Plus remember the MSM went ballistic on her when on vacation she blacked out his name on her visor ... JD Hayworth understood … on that fateful Saturday he defended her … only one

I very much agree with what Sarah had to say. At least she attempted to address the actual situation. I would vote for her. I did vote for her, and if she wouldn't have been on the ticket with McCain, she would have had a better chance.

Bingo

chickenrancher said:

I very much agree with what Sarah had to say. At least she attempted to address the actual situation. I would vote for her. I did vote for her, and if she wouldn't have been on the ticket with McCain, she would have had a better chance.

Click to expand...

Trust me the Dems/Rove knew about the rising star way up North ... They figured McShame was too vain to pick her ... they figured 2014 would be when they would have to deal with her ... why they all got caught off guard ... Think how the MSM
went into panic mode that great day in Dayton ....

GardenOfGlory said:

Oh, for Pete's sake, find a new, equally stupid mantra. You know exactly why she quit.

You really need to stop sucking on that worn out tit. The milk has long soured, and you're still at it, slurping away, making a fool of yourself.

Click to expand...

Au Contraire. So tell us then. If she did nothing wrong ...why did she quit. She "QUIT" to save what she could of her reputation. She has been in the media and knows how to work it. Palin knows there was a lot more money and better opportunities not being governor and chose to capitalize on being propped up into the spotlight. THAT IS WHY SHE QUIT. To make money and possibly run in 2012.

Your snide remarks and my last response to your ignorance got me thrown in time out on the other thread. The Mods here seem to favor your nasty remarks for some reason.

I'm not the one making a fool of myself.

What evidence do we have except for what Sorcha Faal and the looney left pukes out?

http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/politics/370

Sarah Palin's Meeting With Henry Kissinger
WRITTEN BY WARREN MASS
MONDAY, 22 SEPTEMBER 2008 14:44

...

Since the relationship between Kissinger (a former Harvard professor) and Palin at the meeting will undoubtedly be one of mentor-to-protégé, we can reasonably expect that the mentor will indoctrinate his protégé on behalf of the interventionist foreign policy the U.S. government has followed for decades under both Republican and Democrat administrations. If Palin proves to be a good "student" under Kissinger's tutelage, she would tend toward resembling past Kissinger protégés such as Brent Scowcroft and Lawrence Eagleburger.

Veteran observers of post-World War II U.S. foreign policy will likely find few surprises in the direction taken by a future McCain administration (or, a future Obama administration, if that should be the case). The predictability of such policy is made relatively easy by the fact that since 1929, the overwhelming majority of secretaries of state have shared membership in a single influential private policy organization. These have included: Henry Stimpson, Cordell Hull, E.R. Stittinius, Dean Acheson, John Foster Dulles, Christian Herter, Dean Rusk, William Rogers, Henry Kissinger, Cyrus Vance, Edmund Muskie, Alexander Haig, George Schultz, James Baker, Lawrence Eagleberger, Warren Christopher, William Richardson, Madeleine Albright, Colin Powell, and Condoleezza Rice.

Notice that Henry Kissinger, and current Secretary of State Rice belong to this same exclusive club, which, regardless of how one regards its policies, must certainly be regarded as extremely influential. So does Zbigniew Brzezinski, President Carter's national security adviser, who became one of Senator McCain's foreign policy advisers when McCain ran for president the first time and who is now Senator Obama's foreign policy advisor. McCain himself is also a member.

The organization? The New York-based Council on Foreign Relations.

et2 said:

Why do you look beyond the obvious and factual evidence?



View attachment 82673

Click to expand...

When the going got tough in Alaska...she quit and walked off the job. Either that or she decided could make more money in the L48, being a Rock Star.

She wont get my vote. And I know other die hard Republicans that feel the same way.

deleted

packyderms_wife said:

I haven't read any of her books and am not a member of her inner circle and cannot phantom what's in her heart let alone my own... so how do we know she's friends with Kissinger? Aside from the one photo I've seen of them together, and the look on her face says "get your filthy hands off of me you worn out old sock". I haven't seen or read anything that these two are the best of buds. I mean do they go camping and hunting together? Share spa days together??? What evidence do we have except for what Sorcha Faal and the looney left pukes out?

K-

Click to expand...

ewwwww

A few years ago I posted photos of her with Kissinger, hugging him, looking him in the eyes, always one or the other touching.

Just a day or two ago I posted photos of them together (interestingly, it's difficult to find the original links to the several photos of her with him where they're real cozy in his New York office), she was scheduled to be with him 15 minutes-she was there an hour and a half and he walked her down from his office to her car.

The second photo was from a RNC meeting, she doesn't look at all like she's veering away, she has both her hands cupping his in a very affectionate grasp and looking him straight in the eyes.
http://www.timebomb2000.com/vb/showthread.php?t=376709&highlight=palin+kissinger+mccain

Look into Kissinger's past, if she's as intelligent and far sighted as people think, then she has already done this or been appraised of his evil-kibbitzing with him is acceptance, a person is known by the friends he keeps and the political agendas they help along. I've tried and tried to find my photo post on Kissinger and Palin, but I can't find it-maybe it got moved to another forum. Too bad, you'd see she didn't always look uncomfortable...

et2, it's obvious I don't trust Palin, but even I know she had to leave office due to the nauseating amount of frivolous lawsuits slammed up against her by low life scum abusing our court system-even though they were tossed out of court, she still had legal bills as a result, around $4 million dollars worth IIRC. I believe that is why she wrote a book, to help bail herself out of debt.

Found a few:







This looks like a different location, I can't tell for sure. I do believe their shoulders are touching-not something you do with a stranger OR a high powered political official unless you are very familiar with them and like them. Would you stand like this with obama? Didn't think so.

More (but not all) can be seen here, from the same meeting. I just can't imagine touching a man responsible for the mass genocide of so many people, I'm funny that way.

Something is just wrong here. Did you know mccain had a virtual blackout on photos of the day? They finally allowed one photographer. I wonder what they were afraid of, you'd think they'd want her high profile, looking in her element with big dogs.

NC Susan said:

ewwwww

Click to expand...

Photoshoped

et2 said:

Au Contraire. So tell us then. If she did nothing wrong ...why did she quit. She "QUIT" to save what she could of her reputation. She has been in the media and knows how to work it. Palin knows there was a lot more money and better opportunities not being governor and chose to capitalize on being propped up into the spotlight. THAT IS WHY SHE QUIT. To make money and possibly run in 2012.

Your snide remarks and my last response to your ignorance got me thrown in time out on the other thread. The Mods here seem to favor your nasty remarks for some reason.

I'm not the one making a fool of myself.

Click to expand...

See post #7 this thread to see the math.
That's pretty much a no-brainer if one assumes that she loves her state and doesn't want to damage it further than it has been already.
resignation was the RATIONAL choice to protect her state.

night driver said:

See post #7 this thread to see the math.
That's pretty much a no-brainer if one assumes that she loves her state and doesn't want to damage it further than it has been already.
resignation was the RATIONAL choice to protect her state.

Click to expand...

Obvious except to those who have but one cell. The media feeds them a snippet and they run with it. They are the reason the country is screwed without a leader.

I pity those who never "quit" when they know the alternative would be the better course of action. It doesn't matter if it's quitting a job, quitting smoking...you've got to know when to hold 'em and know when to fold 'em.

I'm ambivalent on Sarah, but I've got the common sense to reason things through. Quitting her job as governor is the least of my worries with her.

Here is another guy she cozies up to. She looks relaxed and happy. The photos above with her and Kissinger - she looks uptight to me and very uncomfortable.

Reminder: Sarah Palin supported the Bush bank bailout.

De peasants have no clue. By ve time dey figure vit out, deh vil be subjects of ve new world order and you Sarah vil of course be richly rewarded...

This post has gotten the libtards' panties in a wad. I guess they are mentally ill enough to want Obama in for a second term. That ought to be enough to destroy this nation.

so, I have read lots of reason WHY, but frankly havent seen any answers as to WHY NOT for her as a viable alternative in 12.

And please some one explain to this ignorant okie why she is a worse choice than what we have in the white house.

AT least there is no question where she was born.

Oh, she's not a WORSE choice than 0. And she might even beat him in 2012, given how deluded, clueless or whatever most Americans are about politics. Hell, they elected 0, they can elect Palin too.

It's just that- given previous indicators- there wouldn't be much of real substance any DIFFERENT with her in the job... only difference is the neocons and RINOS would be happy that "their choice" was in the WH, and the libtards, the DU crowd etc. would be complaining.

Meanwhile, America would still be getting bent over the barrel no matter if there was a nominal D or a RINO in the WH. If things hold together long enough for another election, of course...

dd (And I'd be happy to eat my words, if SP would prove me wrong. But I don't see much likelihood of THAT happening. I had high hopes for her when she first appeared on the scene, but her subsequent actions have indicated to me she was and is just one more piece of the political con game.)

TerryK said:

If you are a governor of a fairly backwoods state and have limited exposure to world politics, whether you like him or not, you can learn a lot from a days worth of conversation with Kissinger.
Sarah Palin did an excellent job while she was governor. She was grabbed by McCain because of her record and because he thought she could help him in a clearly hopeless campaign. She did, 10 of thousands of people turned out to hear her where ever she went. McCains group was embarrassed because she usually got more attention than he did.
Democrats and almost all RINO republicans do not like her and that alone is a strong recommendation for me.
During her brief time as a Vice Presidential candidate she stuck a chord with the everyday American. The Dems hated this and the Repubs feared this.
It's time for a common everyday American to become President. I have had it with Lawyers and doctors and elitists in general.

Click to expand...

thankyou for stating the facts so clearly.

when someone else who has her record of reigning in the big dog oil companies as she did in Alaska comes along, then we will know that she has competition. until then, there is none.

and if she is truly listening to the Tea Party, (and who else is?)

she won't be pushing for amnesty.

John Wall said:

This post has gotten the libtards' panties in a wad. I guess they are mentally ill enough to want Obama in for a second term. That ought to be enough to destroy this nation.

Click to expand...

Yes it has. But whats even better it brought them out.

John Wall said:

This post has gotten the libtards' panties in a wad. I guess they are mentally ill enough to want Obama in for a second term. That ought to be enough to destroy this nation.

Click to expand...

You people crack me up, cut it out yer killing me!

Dozdoats said:

Oh, she's not a WORSE choice than 0. And she might even beat him in 2012, given how deluded, clueless or whatever most Americans are about politics. Hell, they elected 0, they can elect Palin too.

It's just that- given previous indicators- there wouldn't be much of real substance any DIFFERENT with her in the job... only difference is the neocons and RINOS would be happy that "their choice" was in the WH, and the libtards, the DU crowd etc. would be complaining.

Meanwhile, America would still be getting bent over the barrel no matter if there was a nominal D or a RINO in the WH. If things hold together long enough for another election, of course...

dd (And I'd be happy to eat my words, if SP would prove me wrong. But I don't see much likelihood of THAT happening. I had high hopes for her when she first appeared on the scene, but her subsequent actions have indicated to me she was and is just one more piece of the political con game.)

Click to expand...

Absolutely.

Palin has shown herself to be a neocon dressed in Tea Party clothing. She is 100% Military/Industrial Complex material. Just another verse, same as the first.

John Wall said:

This post has gotten the libtards' panties in a wad. I guess they are mentally ill enough to want Obama in for a second term. That ought to be enough to destroy this nation.

Click to expand...

medic38572 said:

Yes it has. But whats even better it brought them out.

Click to expand...

So anybody that disagrees is a libtard,eh? You two will do well under the neighbor watch program,ya sound just like DHS.

MDINMT said:

So anybody that disagrees is a libtard,eh?

Click to expand...

You must be new here.

MDINMT said:

So anybody that disagrees is a libtard,eh? You two will do well under the neighbor watch program,ya sound just like DHS.

Click to expand...

It's the same old story don't you know. You go against the grain ... your a Libtard, or one of the other names they like to throw out. The next two years is going to be a blast.