BLOG A TSA encounter in San Diego

Fred

Middle of the road
Phone videos @ link

=================================
http://johnnyedge.blogspot.com/2010/11/these-events-took-place-roughly-between.html

TSA encounter at SAN
[These events took place roughly between 5:30 and 6:30 AM, November 13th in Terminal 2 of the San Diego International Airport. I'm writing this approximately 2 1/2 hours after the events transpired, and they are correct to the best of my recollection. I will admit to being particularly fuzzy on the exact order of events when dealing with the agents after getting my ticket refunded; however, all of the events described did occur.

I had my phone recording audio and video of much of these events. It can be viewed below.

Please spread this story as far and wide as possible. I will make no claims to copyright or otherwise.]


This morning, I tried to fly out of San Diego International Airport but was refused by the TSA. I had been somewhat prepared for this eventuality. I have been reading about the millimeter wave and backscatter x-ray machines and the possible harm to health as well as the vivid pictures they create of people's naked bodies. Not wanting to go through them, I had done my research on the TSA's website prior to traveling to see if SAN had them. From all indications, they did not. When I arrived at the security line, I found that the TSA's website was out of date. SAN does in fact utilize backscatter x-ray machines.

I made my way through the line toward the first line of "defense": the TSA ID checker. This agent looked over my boarding pass, looked over my ID, looked at me and then back at my ID. After that, he waved me through. SAN is still operating metal detectors, so I walked over to one of the lines for them. After removing my shoes and making my way toward the metal detector, the person in front of me in line was pulled out to go through the backscatter machine. After asking what it was and being told, he opted out. This left the machine free, and before I could go through the metal detector, I was pulled out of line to go through the backscatter machine. When asked, I half-chuckled and said, "I don't think so." At this point, I was informed that I would be subject to a pat down, and I waited for another agent.

A male agent (it was a female who had directed me to the backscatter machine in the first place), came and waited for me to get my bags and then directed me over to the far corner of the area for screening. After setting my things on a table, he turned to me and began to explain that he was going to do a "standard" pat down. (I thought to myself, "great, not one of those gropings like I've been reading about".) After he described, the pat down, I realized that he intended to touch my groin. After he finished his description but before he started the pat down, I looked him straight in the eye and said, "if you touch my junk, I'll have you arrested." He, a bit taken aback, informed me that he would have to involve his supervisor because of my comment.

We both stood there for no more than probably two minutes before a female TSA agent (apparently, the supervisor) arrived. She described to me that because I had opted out of the backscatter screening, I would now be patted down, and that involved running hands up the inside of my legs until they felt my groin. I stated that I would not allow myself to be subject to a molestation as a condition of getting on my flight. The supervisor informed me that it was a standard administrative security check and that they were authorized to do it. I repeated that I felt what they were doing was a sexual assault, and that if they were anyone but the government, the act would be illegal. I believe that I was then informed that if I did not submit to the inspection, I would not be getting on my flight. I again stated that I thought the search was illegal. I told her that I would be willing to submit to a walk through the metal detector as over 80% of the rest of the people were doing, but I would not be groped. The supervisor, then offered to go get her supervisor.

I took a seat in a tiny metal chair next to the table with my belongings and waited. While waiting, I asked the original agent (who was supposed to do the pat down) if he had many people opt out to which he replied, none (or almost none, I don't remember exactly). He said that I gave up a lot of rights when I bought my ticket. I replied that the government took them away after September 11th. There was silence until the next supervisor arrived. A few minutes later, the female agent/supervisor arrived with a man in a suit (not a uniform). He gave me a business card identifying him as David Silva, Transportation Security Manager, San Diego International Airport. At this point, more TSA agents as well as what I assume was a local police officer arrived on the scene and surrounded the area where I was being detained. The female supervisor explained the situation to Mr. Silva. After some quick back and forth (that I didn't understand/hear), I could overhear Mr. Silva say something to the effect of, "then escort him from the airport." I again offered to submit to the metal detector, and my father-in-law, who was near by also tried to plead for some reasonableness on the TSA's part.

The female supervisor took my ID at this point and began taking some kind of report with which I cooperated. Once she had finished, I asked if I could put my shoes back on. I was allowed to put my shoes back on and gather my belongs. I asked, "are we done here" (it was clear at this point that I was going to be escorted out), and the local police officer said, "follow me". I followed him around the side of the screening area and back out to the ticketing area. I said apologized to him for the hassle, to which he replied that it was not a problem.

I made my way over to the American Airlines counter, explained the situation, and asked if my ticket could be refunded. The woman behind the counter furiously typed away for about 30 seconds before letting me know that she would need a supervisor. She went to the other end of the counter. When she returned, she informed me that the ticket was non-refundable, but that she was still trying to find a supervisor. After a few more minutes, she was able to refund my ticket. I told her that I had previously had a bad experience with American Airlines and had sworn never to fly with them again (I rationalized this trip since my father-in-law had paid for the ticket), but that after her helpfulness, I would once again be willing to use their carrier again.

At this point, I thought it was all over. I began to make my way to the stairs to exit the airport, when I was approached by another man in slacks and a sport coat. He was accompanied by the officer that had escorted me to the ticketing area and Mr. Silva. He informed me that I could not leave the airport. He said that once I start the screening in the secure area, I could not leave until it was completed. Having left the area, he stated, I would be subject to a civil suit and a $10,000 fine. I asked him if he was also going to fine the 6 TSA agents and the local police officer who escorted me from the secure area. After all, I did exactly what I was told. He said that they didn't know the rules, and that he would deal with them later. They would not be subject to civil penalties. I then pointed to Mr. Silva and asked if he would be subject to any penalties. He is the agents' supervisor, and he directed them to escort me out. The man informed me that Mr. Silva was new and he would not be subject to penalties, either. He again asserted the necessity that I return to the screening area. When I asked why, he explained that I may have an incendiary device and whether or not that was true needed to be determined. I told him that I would submit to a walk through the metal detector, but that was it; I would not be groped. He told me that their procedures are on their website, and therefore, I was fully informed before I entered the airport; I had implicitly agreed to whatever screening they deemed appropriate. I told him that San Diego was not listed on the TSA's website as an airport using Advanced Imaging Technology, and I believed that I would only be subject to the metal detector. He replied that he was not a webmaster, and I asked then why he was referring me to the TSA's website if he didn't know anything about it. I again refused to re-enter the screening area.

The man asked me to stay put while he walked off to confer with the officer and Mr. Silva. They went about 20 feet away and began talking amongst themselves while I waited. I couldn't over hear anything, but I got the impression that the police officer was recounting his version of the events that had transpired in the screening area (my initial refusal to be patted down). After a few minutes, I asked loudly across the distance if I was free to leave. The man dismissively held up a finger and said, "hold on". I waited. After another minute or so, he returned and asked for my name. I asked why he needed it, and reminded him that the female supervisor/agent had already taken a report. He said that he was trying to be friendly and help me out. I asked to what end. He reminded me that I could be sued civilly and face a $10,000 fine and that my cooperation could help mitigate the penalties I was facing. I replied that he already had my information in the report that was taken and I asked if I was free to leave. I reminded him that he was now illegally detaining me and that I would not be subject to screening as a condition of leaving the airport. He told me that he was only trying to help (I should note that his demeanor never suggested that he was trying to help. I was clearly being interrogated.), and that no one was forcing me to stay. I asked if tried to leave if he would have the officer arrest me. He again said that no one was forcing me to stay. I looked him in the eye, and said, "then I'm leaving". He replied, "then we'll bring a civil suit against you", to which I said, "you bring that suit" and walked out of the airport.
 

Hfcomms

EN66iq
The TSA is garnering a lot of bad attention and I hope it goes viral. People can make a difference by voting with their feet and their pocketbooks. Turn on the lights and the cockroaches flee into the darkness.
 

Mzkitty

I give up.
Just posted elsewhere as a response to this article, FYI:

Today, 11:26 AM
Post #3
Guest



The titillation of the 'groping of the junk' is lost the reality of why those expensive backscatter xray machines have been so quickly ensconced within the commercial airline industry-MICHAEL CHERTOFF-ex head of the DHS is profiting off of this business. Jim Kirwin has a written a good article about this-

http://rense.com/general92/tsa.htm

here's the most important fact about what this is all about:

QUOTE
THREE: The virtually useless US Attorney General * needs to open an immediate investigation into Mr. Chertoff's business ventures and the obvious 'conflicts of the public's-interests' which he willfully created with this latest endeavor. Chertoff was responsible as the head of Homeland Security, for creating the supposed need for these backscatter scanners in the first place, and as head of that agency he decided whether or not such a device would be "needed" and then he proceeded to insure that the use of the machines was mandated (after he stepped down) so that after he left 'government' he could then get the no-bid contract for these very expensive machines. What a colossal scam of the flying public and the citizens of this country. This was a shakedown pure and simple: and he should be charged under the RICO statutes as a racketeer that has extorted money for false purposes from the Treasury while inflicting massive humiliation upon the flying public for no good reason except to increase his illicit profits from this bit of vulture capitalism while subjecting the public to insulting and outrageous treatment under the guise of national defense.


Since so many are backing off of all extraneous travel due to these invasive searches I also wonder if it is the workings of those who want to install high speed rail lines throughout all the towns and cities and byways of this country. CA passed an initiative to build their version of the high speed rail lines and now seeing how and where these lines would go-over and through every town from North to Southern CA-at incredibly expensive prices and with the CHINESE to be getting contracts to install them... get rid of the non cost effective airlines-have the taxpayers fund the high speed rails and VOILA another profit making industry for no bid government contractors or foreign agents from China.

:shk:
 

Tundra Gypsy

Veteran Member
Some guy is trying to get anyone flying the day before Thanksgiving to 'opt out' of the scanners; hopefull causing serious problems at airports. People need to make their feelings known. This situation is getting ridiculous. I'll never fly again because of this.
 

Lone Wolf

Lives on TB
I don't have the money to fly and a place to go, but if I did, I would go by car

or I wouldn't go. Screw the airlines AND the TSA

lw
 

Perpetuity

Inactive
And a little follow up on the "Don't grope me bro" guy.

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/nov/15/tsa-probe-scan-resistor/

TSA to investigate body scan resister
Oceanside man took a stand against security, went viral

BY ROBERT J. HAWKINS
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 2010 AT 7:59 P.M.

Sort of, security officials should make exceptions for passengers who refuse normal procedures after determining they don't pose a security risk through other means.

Tyner recorded the half-hour long encounter on his cell phone and later posted it to his personal blog, along with an extensive account of the incident. The blog went viral, attracting hundreds of thousands of readers and thousands of comments.

Michael J. Aguilar, chief of the TSA office in San Diego, called a news conference at the airport Monday afternoon to announce the probe. He said the investigation could lead to prosecution and civil penalties of up to $11,000.

TSA agents had told Tyner on Saturday that he could be fined up to $10,000.

“That’s the old fine,” Aguilar said. “It has been increased.”

Tyner’s stand tapped into an undercurrent of resentment toward the TSA and how security checks are conducted at the nation’s airports. Those commenting about Tyner’s experience at SignOnSanDiego.com told their own stories of personal humiliations and invasive body searches.

TSA chief John Pistole was grilled about Tyner’s case Monday on CNN.

“The bottom line is, if somebody doesn’t go through proper security screening, they’re not going to go on the flight,” Pistole said.

Other news websites, from gri.pe to Yahoo! News to Drudge Report, have consumed Tyner’s tale and recirculated it to millions of readers. On Monday, Tyner spent the entire day fielding interviews from television, radio and news agencies.

Tyner, 31, was on his way to South Dakota on Saturday to go pheasant hunting. He was chosen for a full-body scan and opted out because he thought it was invasive. He was then informed that he would be subjected to a body search. He told the TSA agent, “"You touch my junk and I'm going to have you arrested.”

Tyner likened the proposed search procedure to a “sexual assault.”

When he tried to assert his rights, Tyner was told by a TSA supervisor on tape, “By buying your ticket you gave up a lot of rights.”

Aguilar says that Tyner was facing nothing more than the traditional pat-down that TSA has used for some time, and not a more aggressive body search in effect since late October.

In the end, security escorted Tyner out of the airport, after American Airlines refunded his ticket.

According to Aguilar, Tyner is under investigation for leaving the security area without permission. That’s prohibited, among other reasons, to prevent potential terrorists from entering security, gaining information, and leaving.

Since Saturday, Tyner’s story has added fuel to the Opt Out Day movement which is calling on air travelers to choose not to undergo the full-body scans on Nov. 24, the day before Thanksgiving and traditionally one of the year’s top travel days.

Since the rollout of the imaging scanners there has been controversy over the quality of the images, which show limited details of a person’s entire body, and the possible saving of the images – something TSA has denied is possible.

The level of exposure to radiation has also been an issue for many.

Aguilar cautioned against the scanner boycott. He said he is aware of a backlash.

“Let me paraphrase our new administrator, John Pistole,” said Aguilar. “It really is irresponsible to encourage anyone to opt out of a technology that is there in place specifically to protect the public.”

In late October, TSA added another layer of security, the resolution pat-down, which requires TSA agents to grasp the body of the subject more firmly when running hands over limbs and also requires probing up to the genital areas of the body.

Aguilar said that once a passenger enters the security area, there is a legal obligation to follow through with the process.

While a passenger can, like Tyner, ask to opt-out of the full body scan, they must walk through the traditional metal scanner and then, at the discretion of the TSA, undergo a pat-down search.

Aguilar said the aggressive body search is not designed as an inducement for passengers to opt into the full body scan. Aguilar said that since the resolution pat-downs began, there have been only four in San Diego.

And even though there are 10 full-body scanners stationed throughout San Diego’s airport, it is rare to see more than one in operation in a security area. The TSA staff does not yet have enough trained people to operate them, Aguilar said.

Only about 4 percent of San Diego’s passengers undergo the full body scan at this point, Aguilar said.
 
Last edited:

dstraito

TB Fanatic
Everyone needs to adopt that stance.

Wand me but don't touch my junk and I'm not going through the radiation machine.

As much as possible stop flying. The Airlines will have their lobbyists repeal this new TSA process in a flash.

We should call for the elimination of the TSA, they are a joke.
 

Meemur

Voice on the Prairie
I'll be driving anywhere I need to go, or I won't be going. I'm finished with flying, unless there are major revisions to security procedures.
 

pops88

Girls with Guns Member
Aguilar said that once a passenger enters the security area, there is a legal obligation to follow through with the process.

Mr. Aguilar, show us line and verse of that law. I don't think you can. Good luck with the lawsuit since Tyner was escorted from the area by your own people. Nice way to really coalesce people and create an even bigger $#@! storm. Good luck with that, moron. We the people are not going to put up with being sexually assaulted by perverts, homosexuals or pedophiles or give a porn show in order to be able to fly. Evey woman who has to fly and undergo a pat down should yell, "Oh my God, she touched my clitoris." A TSA job is now a pedophile's and perverts dream. I read where a Sky West pilot with his 18 year old daughter heard a TSA agent say into his headset, "Here comes a cutie." I've already told Southwest Airlines I'm returning my refundable ticket and why, and will shortly be contacting my representatives in D.C.
 

Double_A

TB Fanatic
I dunno but to me it sounds like the TSA has a real problems on it's hands.

I the past all I've heard about is grousing and complaining over TSA, that is to be expected. Now you have people who are taking action they are not just complaining they are refusing "no I'm not going to do this".

That is a whole step up. Somebody (waiting for you Tr) will say ah this is nothing, people will do what the gov wants. To that I would say maybe, but it just takes a few, a few brave people who say you've gone too far. This will resonate with millions who have already been frustrated and things will tip.

So what does the government ned to do? They will need to force the issue, somewhere somehow innocents will be killed. An event will be created, some event, some incident which horrifies people and then the TSA will crow, "see, see this is why we tell you that you must submit, we don't do this for fun but your own safety and that of others."

and people will submit.

And then the next level up is the anal & vaginal bombs. That have already been used in an Assassination attempt in Saudi Arabia. When a person was screened through the current technology that is in use and being refused and went through undetected. He almost killed a Saudi prince when his anal bomb detonated.

Then it won't just be a good pat down it will be rubber gloves and a finger in your asshole or vagina until full body "x-ray like" scanning comes into play.

So you see the next level will require an "x-ray like" scan using some form of ionizing radiation.

Sorry folks I don't want to like in a society like that.
 

TheHippie

Veteran Member
Anyone who flies anymore must be a sheeple.

I refuse to.

:dvl2:

Some of us have to fly due to the nature of our jobs. It's either fly or be unemployed......

I went through Heathrow back in OCT.....was subjected to the backscatter as well a pat down w/ groin rubbing. To make the whole thing suck even more, once your in the international terminal you can't leave it and there aren't smoking sections anywhere. Worst 12 hours ever.

But your right, avoid flying if you can. The only way I see to get the gestapo like TSA out, is to boycott the airlines in mass.
 
Time to take a page from the 50s and 60s civil rights and Vietnam War protests -- passive, non-violent sit-ins at the airports, in the traffic areas, bodily clogging up every inch that they can -- yes, there are big fines and several will be made examples, but if this is done by MANY, then it will overwhelm the system to such an extent that the system will HAVE to make the necessary changes. Sure, the system can ratchet up the confrontational aspects several notches, bigger fines, severe threats, jack-boot tactics, batons, dogs, gas, etc. -- think Selma and Birmingham, AL, or the Pentagon protests à la Allen Ginsburg -- am NOT saying that you have to agree with the civil rights movement or the Ginsburg/Vietnam protests, rather am talking TACTICS that work -- think Gandhi and the Indian independence movement.

Was conversing with a senior female family member, recently, regarding how Congress is out of control with spending -- she is in her 80s, but sharp and spry -- nobody's fool -- she mentioned that another effective tactic would be for a GRANNY-activist group to descend upon Washington en masse -- peaceful but persistent protests in the Capitol building, in Congressional offices -- she pointed out the video value for the evening news, of Grannies being dragged off by police, jailed, etc. -- talk about clogging up the system with a VERY delicate PR problem -- she asks the obvious question -- HOW long before America rises up in SHARP rebuke against TPTB, once they witness via news, internet, YouTube, real-time video streaming from smart cell phones, GRANNIES -- their "mothers and grandmothers" -- being hauled off to jail?

Indeed.

Grannies, perhaps you should "load for bear."


intothegoodnight
 
Last edited:

Lone Eagle Woman

Veteran Member
Now I am another person who Absolutely Refuses to Fly Anymore!!! The last
time I flew was before 9/11. I recommend to everyone to simply NOT FLY!
But if you do have to fly then refuse the screenings and gum up the system.
Now I live here in the Rocky Mountain West with Wilderness outside the doorway,
just as I like it. Why would I even want to go anyplace else.

Now as Thomas Jefferson said, "Resistance to Tyranny is Obediance to God"!
 
Last edited:
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/p...takes-aim-at-screening-1576602-108259869.html

Amid Airport Anger, GOP Takes Aim At Screening

BYRON YORK, Chief Political Correspondent

November 15, 2010

Did you know that the nation's airports are not required to have Transportation Security Administration screeners checking passengers at security checkpoints? The 2001 law creating the TSA gave airports the right to opt out of the TSA program in favor of private screeners after a two-year period. Now, with the TSA engulfed in controversy and hated by millions of weary and sometimes humiliated travelers, Rep. John Mica, the Republican who will soon be chairman of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, is reminding airports that they have a choice.

Mica, one of the authors of the original TSA bill, has recently written to the heads of more than 150 airports nationwide suggesting they opt out of TSA screening. "When the TSA was established, it was never envisioned that it would become a huge, unwieldy bureaucracy which was soon to grow to 67,000 employees," Mica writes. "As TSA has grown larger, more impersonal, and administratively top-heavy, I believe it is important that airports across the country consider utilizing the opt-out provision provided by law."

In addition to being large, impersonal, and top-heavy, what really worries critics is that the TSA has become dangerously ineffective. Its specialty is what those critics call "security theater" -- that is, a show of what appear to be stringent security measures designed to make passengers feel more secure without providing real security. "That's exactly what it is," says Mica. "It's a big Kabuki dance."

Now, the dance has gotten completely out of hand. And like lots of fliers -- I spoke to him as he waited for a flight at the Orlando airport -- Mica sees TSA's new "naked scanner" machines and groping, grossly invasive passenger pat-downs as just part of a larger problem. TSA, he says, is relying more on passenger humiliation than on practices that are proven staples of airport security.

For example, many security experts have urged TSA to adopt techniques, used with great success by the Israeli airline El Al, in which passengers are observed, profiled, and most importantly, questioned before boarding planes. So TSA created a program known as SPOT -- Screening of Passengers by Observation Techniques. It began hiring what it called behavior detection officers, who would be trained to notice passengers who acted suspiciously. TSA now employs about 3,000 behavior detection officers, stationed at about 160 airports across the country.

The problem is, they're doing it all wrong. A recent Government Accountability Office study found that TSA "deployed SPOT nationwide without first validating the scientific basis for identifying suspicious passengers in an airport environment." They haven't settled on the standards needed to stop bad actors.

"It's not an Israeli model, it's a TSA, screwed-up model," says Mica. "It should actually be the person who's looking at the ticket and talking to the individual. Instead, they've hired people to stand around and observe, which is a bastardization of what should be done."

In a May 2010 letter to Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, Mica noted that the GAO "discovered that since the program's inception, at least 17 known terrorists ... have flown on 24 different occasions, passing through security at eight SPOT airports." One of those known terrorists was Faisal Shahzad, who made it past SPOT monitors onto a Dubai-bound plane at New York's JFK International Airport not long after trying to set off a car bomb in Times Square. Federal agents nabbed him just before departure.

Mica and other critics in Congress want to see quick and meaningful changes in the way TSA works. They go back to the days just after Sept. 11, when there was a hot debate about whether the new passenger-screening force would be federal employees, as most Democrats wanted, or private contractors, as most Republicans wanted. Democrats won and TSA has been growing ever since.

But the law did allow a test program in which five airports were allowed to use private contractors. A number of studies done since then have shown that contractors perform a bit better than federal screeners, and they're also more flexible and open to innovation. (The federal government pays the cost of screening whether performed by the TSA or by contractors, and contractors work under federal supervision.)

TSA critics know a federal-to-private change won't solve all of the problems with airport security. But it might create the conditions under which some of those problems could indeed be fixed. With passenger anger overflowing and new leadership in the House, something might finally get done.


Byron York, The Examiner's chief political correspondent, can be contacted at byork@washingtonexaminer.com. His column appears on Tuesday and Friday, and his stories and blogposts appear on ExaminerPolitics.com.
 
Top