HEALTH McCain Bill S 3002 CODEX is here!!!

energy_wave

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Remember what I have been saying about CODEX?

Sen. John McCain has introduced a horrific bill, S 3002, the “Dietary Supplement Safety [sic] Act of 2010″ (DSSA) designed to end your access to high potency supplements by giving the bloated, corrupt and dangerous FDA MORE power to destroy supplement access. This bill is absolutely NOT to be confused with DSHEA, the Dietary Supplements Health and Education Act (1994), which says nutrients are food and, as food, you can have them in any form – and any amount – you like. If we allow DSSA to pass, we will be living – and dying – under something very much like the European Food Supplements Directive’s anti-supplement restrictions, implementing Codex Alimentarius’ dietary supplements and nutritional restrictions, to the “T” — effective as close to immediately as the Fraud and Death Administration can manage it. Listen to the Dr. Rima Reports as Dr. Rima interviews Sarah Schones, MD, a German Immunologist practicing natural medicine in Germany: . Food Supplements are going the way of the dodo in the EU. The US is clearly next unless we act now – in massive numbers, once for each member of your family

http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=4615#2



http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=4615
 

Mzkitty

I give up.
I clicked your link and this was there also with your info:


This text-only eAlert in an attempt to pierce the wall of censorship that has become increasingly apparent blocking your Health Freedom Action eAlerts over the past several weeks. Ever since the ground breaking 2010 Health Freedom War Council our blasts are blocked, censored, and blatantly interfered with. We have recently been alerted that AOL, Verizon, Yahoo, Gmail and possibly other email service providers appear to be preventing our urgent messages from getting to you, our subscribers. This despite the fact that emails are only sent is to supporters who have individually chosen to receive these messages, (”opted in”). Yes, Natural Solutions Foundation blasts are being blocked, in violation of your right to freedom of information!

Why? Because we are truly the Voice of Global Health Freedom™ and we are very effective! You know you can rely on our information, and so do the Powers That Be, the ones that do not want you to have that information. It really is that simple.

When you receive this email, we urge you to send it to everyone you know since our ability to reach our huge email list is being blocked, we believe, intentionally.
 

Troke

Deceased
http://mccain.senate.gov/public/ind...ecord_id=952dda07-b71c-4034-4f34-c38974978f7d

News Release

Like many of you, I am looking forward to watching the Super Bowl this Sunday and the Winter Olympics later this month. However, a little over a year ago the NFL suspended six players, including two players from one of the teams competing this Sunday, for violating the league’s anti-doping policy. Several of the players were surprised that they tested positive for a banned substance because they used a dietary supplement they believed to be safe and legal.

It is for precisely this reason that today Senators Dorgan and I are proud to introduce the Dietary Supplement Safety Act of 2010. All Americans should know the exact ingredients of any dietary supplement they use and the FDA must have the tools necessary to ensure the safety of dietary supplements.



· This legislation would require dietary supplement manufactures to register with the FDA and fully disclose the ingredients contained in the supplement. Surveys have found that a majority of dietary supplement users believe the FDA approves the safety of dietary supplements prior to market introduction. However, that is not the case. In fact, dietary supplement manufacturers’ advertised claims of safety and effectiveness are not reviewed or approved by the FDA.

· Last January, the GAO published a comprehensive report entitled, “The FDA Should Take Further Actions to Improve Oversight and Consumer Understanding of Dietary Supplements.” The report stated, “…several factors limit the agency’s ability to detect concerns and remove products from the market. For example, FDA has limited information on the number and location of dietary supplement firms, the types of products currently available in the marketplace, and … once FDA has identified a safety concern, the agency’s ability to remove a product from the market is hindered by a lack of mandatory recall authority…”



· Lastly, the proposed legislation provides the FDA with mandatory recall authority if a product is found to be unsafe or harmful. It took the FDA ten years to ban ephedra – a dietary ingredient used for weight loss and bodybuilding that was found to cause serious medical risks to users including death. It has been reported that use of ephedra contributed to the deaths of Baltimore Orioles pitcher Steve Bechler and Minnesota Vikings player Korey Stringer. Additionally, there are numerous stories of amateur athletes who took this supplement and experienced serious health problems.

· It is my hope that this legislation will ensure that all Americans, including athletes, have all the information necessary to make informed decision when choosing whether to use a dietary supplement, and that the FDA has the ability to remove any harmful dietary supplements from the market.
 

Wise Owl

Deceased
McCain, leave our suppliments alone!

As to the football players who died, they probably knew the amount they were taking would or could hurt them. But these guys just want the edge to get their job done and they take the risks anyway.

Ephedra was a very good herb to help with asthma sufferers and they have taken it away to be replaced by big pharma's chemical stuff. Big pharma can't make money off most herbal remedies but they can off their chemical compounds with their patents.

It's all about money and keeping us sick so they can push their drugs.

McCain is in somebody's pocket and is being paid well to push this new bill. BELIEVE that....he is not doing it to keep anyone safe. He doesn't have enough brains to do that.
 

brokenwings

Veteran Member
All those stinking crooks in Washington are all the same. Not a single one of them have any integrity. Ron Paul seems to, but how does he survive amongst all those sharks??

We need to kick them ALL out!! Only way our country will survive and become great again. :eleph:
 

et2

TB Fanatic
http://www.lef.org/featured-articles/Dietary-Supplement-Safety-Act-of-2010.htm

New Bill Seeks to Ban Consumer Access to Dietary Supplements
By William Faloon

Senator John McCain has introduced a bill that if passed will drive up the cost of dietary supplements and restrict your access to them.

This bill seeks to give the FDA complete and arbitrary control over what supplements you are allowed to have. I am writing you about this and a far more important matter.

If you believe in the science of mathematics, you may have noticed that this country is descending into financial oblivion. There is a debate as to whether this is the fault of the private or governmental sector.

My position is simple. If it were not for the technological advances made possible by private enterprise, the adverse effects of governmental ineptitude would have rendered this nation insolvent decades ago. Said differently, if it were not for the increases in productivity and reductions in costs made possible by free enterprise, government waste and fraud would have already destroyed us.

By way of example, Life Extension has approximately 300 employees today. We develop dietary supplement formulations and make them available at lower relative prices each year. If it were not for our private enterprise-invented computers, it would require several thousand employees to do the same work. That would mean higher prices and inferior products for you, assuming we remained solvent.

Senator John McCain (and others) is proposing to squander tax-debt dollars by mandating more government waste, while sticking the private sector with oppressive laws that will hinder scientific advances and increase costs. The net effect will be to take away your free access to dietary supplements.

Pharmaceutical interests are obviously behind this latest effort to legislatively force more Americans towards expensive prescription drugs and away from natural ways of preventing degenerative disease.

In normal times, I would ask each of you to e-mail Congress to demand that they refuse to co-sponsor the bill that John McCain introduced in the Senate. But these are far from normal times.

You should instead use John McCain’s bill as an example of the rampant tax-debt fraud being perpetrated by Washington, D.C., politicians and bureaucrats. Please use our convenient legislative action center to e-mail your Senators and Representative to not only protest against this corrupt piece of legislation, but every government project that contributes to an impossible-to-pay-back federal debt.

(Note: This communication is not an attack on John McCain or any other elected official. Many Senators would have been deceived by pharmaceutical lobbyists as you will soon read.)

The bill being spearheaded by Senators John McCain and Byron Dorgan represents the kind of federal regulation that is not only ineffective, but also suffocates innovation in ways that inflict permanent damage to this nation’s economic vitality.

The bill supposedly originates from the controversy surrounding the use of steroids by Major League Baseball players. Since some unethical companies illegally sold steroid drugs as “dietary supplements,” certain members of the Senate (i.e., John McCain and Byron Dorgan) appear to have been deceived into believing that the FDA needs to be given additional power to ban dietary supplements across the board.

The fact is that the FDA has all the legal authority it needs to remove supplements that contain illegal drugs from the market. The FDA has failed to do its job, and there are companies selling dietary supplements that contain prescription drugs. If the FDA continues to fail to do its job, then these companies will continue to sell drug-tainted supplements no matter what new laws are “created” by Congress.

The outrage over this bill expressed by so many supplement consumers is that it gives the FDA broad and arbitrary new powers to remove natural products from the marketplace. Since the FDA (and Congress) is dominated by large pharmaceutical interests, this bill will effectively enable drug companies to control which supplements you have access to.

You may recall the FDA’s ban last year of a more effective form of vitamin B6 (pyridoxamine) because a pharmaceutical company wants to have it approved as an expensive new prescription drug to treat diabetic kidney failure.

If McCain’s bill is passed, it will make it far easier for pharmaceutical companies to file use patents on what are now inexpensive dietary supplements and convert them into outrageously priced “drugs”. Just look at the cost of prescription drug fish oil that so many cardiologists are prescribing to their patients. It costs about seven times more than the same amount of EPA/DHA fish oil you can buy as a dietary supplement. Just imagine if the FDA was given arbitrary power to ban omega-3 dietary supplements!

In order to mislead the public about the true nature of this bill, it has been named the Dietary Supplement Safety Act of 2010 (DSSA). It purports to protect consumers, but the question arises, from what?

According to a published report by the American Association of Poison Control Centers, no one died in the year 2008 as a result of taking a dietary supplement.1 The facts are that legitimate reports of deaths caused by dietary supplements this century are virtually non-existent.

Despite this safety track record, John McCain’s bill would give the FDA authority to draw up a list of allowed and disallowed supplements (and supplement potencies). This alone would destroy your free access to supplements. But there is more.

There is no real world rationale for this legislation. Yet this bill would automatically cause any dietary supplement to be classified as “adulterated” if it is “manufactured, packaged, held, distributed, labeled or licensed by a dietary supplement company not registered with the Secretary.” The “Secretary” in this case is the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the department of the federal government that oversees the FDA.

The registration requirements would add layers of overhead costs to manufacturers who are already fully compliant with current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP) and are inspected by the FDA. It would also create an entire new category of taxpayer-funded bureaucrats who would oversee this hideous expansion of federal control over dietary supplement access.

The registration process would require paperwork to be submitted to the federal government for every new formulation, re-formulation, new ingredient, etc. The effect will be to take what are now low-cost natural supplements and force the paperwork requirements to be more closely aligned with those of unaffordable prescription drugs.

Burdensome registration requirements also mandate voluminous paperwork submissions for new ingredients that give the FDA more power to DENY the “approval” of a natural ingredient. This clause of the bill would further reduce the availability of new dietary supplements coming to the market…effectively giving pharmaceutical companies a monopoly over what new health products you are allowed to use. Any new products that make it to market will carry the higher cost associated with complying with this bill’s new obstructive mandates.

The FDA already requires manufacturers to maintain records of serious adverse reaction reports. This bill would require that all “non-serious adverse events” be submitted to the federal government. The problem is that when a large group of people take any product, there are always coincidental adverse reactions. This means that for any given product, the FDA can arbitrarily take the list of adverse reports submitted to it and use it as a basis to remove the product, even if there was not a single valid adverse reaction! Once again, pharmaceutical companies would be able, under the Freedom of Information Act, to gain access to coincidental reports of adverse reactions, and petition the FDA to REMOVE the supplement from the market. (There are of course millions of cases of serious adverse reactions — [including many deaths] — on file with the FDA about the drugs they approve, but of course these drugs are virtually never withdrawn from the marketplace.)

The FDA already has broad powers to remove dangerous products. This legislation would enable the FDA to ban anything if they have only “reasonable probability” that there is a serious problem with a product. This kind of discretionary authority gives the FDA tyrannical power to ban supplements, a power they have not hesitated to use when they’ve had it.

Recall that in the early 1990s, the FDA declared that many of the supplements used today, including CoQ10, selenium and chromium, were inherently dangerous. The public’s revolt against the FDA’s absurd proclamation led to passage of the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA) of 1994. This is the law that protects consumers’ rights to access low-cost dietary supplements. The Dietary Supplement Safety Act (DSSA) bill introduced by John McCain would largely eviscerate the protections afforded by DSHEA.

Just imagine owning a pharmaceutical company and hearing from physicians that patients are refusing to take your expensive side effect-prone drugs. Instead you learn they are switching to low-cost dietary supplements that you cannot patent.

Since you control a large percentage of Congress, the logical solution is to have legislation enacted that will enable the FDA (that you also control) to remove supplements that compete with your drugs. That is exactly what the Dietary Supplement Safety Act of 2010 (DSSA) will accomplish if Big Pharma has its way.


The greatest economic challenge this country faces is how to deal with runaway disease care costs (they call it “health care” when it isn’t). What few understand is that there is no real medical cost crisis. Medical care is so expensive today because it has been so corruptly over-regulated. Disease care costs, in other words, are egregiously hyper-inflated compared to what their free market price would be.

FDA Failure, Deception and Abuse is the title of a new book that documents that disease care costs are a result of endless legislation passed by Congress that enables those in conventional medicine to earn obscene profits, while the nation’s economy collapses under the burden of outlandish prices for dangerous and minimally effective therapies.

The proposed Dietary Supplement Safety Act of 2010 is an egregious example of how this kind of insidious legislation comes into being, and how the public is deceived into thinking that Congress is seeking to “protect” them (in this case from nothing), when the real purpose of the legislation is to further enrich the entrenched drug cartel that long ago bought and paid for most of Congress and the FDA.

In addition to drug companies who want the Dietary Supplement Safety Act enacted into law, professional sports teams are also behind McCain’s legislation. This is because they want to blame somebody other than their players and themselves for illegal steroid use in sports. See the following statement by the Baseball Commissioner Allan H. Selig made on February 4, 2010:

“On behalf of Major League Baseball, I would like to thank Senators John McCain and Byron Dorgan for their efforts to broaden the Food and Drug Administration’s regulatory authority over dietary supplements. We fully support the proposed legislation designed to protect athletes and consumers from dangerous, mislabeled and tainted over-the-counter supplements. The continued leadership of Senators McCain and Dorgan has made an impact on this important issue.” By conspiring with what has been long viewed as a wholesome American sport, pharmaceutical interests are seeking to deceptively portray this insidious legislation as being beneficial to consumers — the exact opposite of what its effects will be.


In the face of unconscionable levels of governmental waste and abuse, the federal deficit-debt is at obscene levels, while government actuaries mathematically project financial insolvency in the not-too-distant future.

Why then is any legislation being proposed that creates more federal debt, saddles the private sector with needless but costly new regulations, and denies Americans free access to better dietary supplements that reduce their need for expensive medical care?

The Dietary Supplement Safety Act of 2010 is a blatant example of how Congress undermines free markets to enrich campaign contributors, decimates private sector innovation, and hastens the federal government’s plunge into a financial abyss.

The only encouraging news is that the numbers of dedicated supplement users are enormous. I ask each and every one of you to click here to conveniently alert your two Senators and Representative about this oppressive legislation that should not be co-sponsored and should instead be vigorously opposed.

As in the 1980s and 1990s, the majority of the public is strongly on our side. Your voice needs to be heard to usurp the predatory financial influence pharmaceutical companies wield over Congress.
 

willdo

Veteran Member
sent McCain

a message on his sight...tried to educate him, praying it works. I have had it, soon as this snow is gone...I will no longer be a republican...
 

Y2kO

Inactive
This legislation would require dietary supplement manufactures to register with the FDA and fully disclose the ingredients contained in the supplement.

If McCain’s bill is passed, it will make it far easier for pharmaceutical companies to file use patents on what are now inexpensive dietary supplements and convert them into outrageously priced “drugs”.
 

Phil Ca

Inactive
"First they came and took away my 'sassafras' tea, but nobody complained,
then they took away 'ephedra', but nobody complained, and now they want to take away my 'vitamin C' and my 'CoQ10' but nobody will complain" Does that remind you of a quote from a Rev. Niemollar during the nazi days of Germany?

If this nefarious bill becomes law may we then exppect to see a new breed of police called the DSP (Dietary Supplement Police)? Would they be armed with Glocks and MP5 SMG's, and face masks and armor vests? Would they be allowed to break in your doors to search for vitamins?

I have mentioned before about our experience in Switzerland when we wanted a bottle of hydrogen peroxide. Here in the Costco store a 32 oz. bottle is about $1.40 or so. In Geneva it was nearly $5.00 for a small bottle of about 6 or 8 Oz. that had to be brought out by a clerk after she entered a locked room and storage cabinet.

I read somewhere that Vitamin C in Germany costs about $1.00 a tablet of 500 mg. Here a container of 500 each is a few bucks at Costco.

Big Pharma and the FDA will go crazy if this passes because they are looking for more big "bucks".

Contact your so-called elected representatives and encourage them to stand against this schme.

Also check out the book available from this site. www.NaturalCures.com it is about books by Kevin Trudeau and a lot of good info is in them.
 

L.A.B.

CV19 West Coast 1st Battalion “Maverick’s”
John is such a down home Arizonian and Sport lovin fan. This was his speech to disarm Joe-High-Five'n-Six-Pack.

http://mccain.senate.gov/public/ind...ecord_id=952dda07-b71c-4034-4f34-c38974978f7d

SENATOR JOHN MCCAIN INTRODUCES THE DIETARY SUPPLEMENT SAFETY ACT OF 2010

February 3, 2010

·******* Like many of you, I am looking forward to watching the Super Bowl this Sunday and the Winter Olympics later this month.* However, a little over a year ago the NFL suspended six players, including two players from one of the teams competing this Sunday, for violating the league’s anti-doping policy.* Several of the players were surprised that they tested positive for a banned substance because they used a dietary supplement they believed to be safe and legal.*
*It is for precisely this reason that today Senators Dorgan and I are proud to introduce the Dietary Supplement Safety Act of 2010.* All Americans should know the exact ingredients of any dietary supplement they use and the FDA must have the tools necessary to ensure the safety of dietary supplements.

*
·******* This legislation would require dietary supplement manufactures to register with the FDA and fully disclose the ingredients contained in the supplement.* Surveys have found that a majority of dietary supplement users believe the FDA approves the safety of dietary supplements prior to market introduction.* However, that is not the case.* In fact, dietary supplement manufacturers’ advertised claims of safety and effectiveness are not reviewed or approved by the FDA.
·******* Last January, the GAO published a comprehensive report entitled, “The FDA Should Take Further Actions to Improve Oversight and Consumer Understanding of Dietary Supplements.”* The report stated, “…several factors limit the agency’s ability to detect concerns and remove products from the market.* For example, FDA has limited information on the number and location of dietary supplement firms, the types of products currently available in the marketplace, and … once FDA has identified a safety concern, the agency’s ability to remove a product from the market is hindered by a lack of mandatory recall authority…”*
*
·******* Lastly, the proposed legislation provides the FDA with mandatory recall authority if a product is found to be unsafe or harmful.* It took the FDA ten years to ban ephedra – a dietary ingredient used for weight loss and bodybuilding that was found to cause serious medical risks to users including death.* It has been reported that use of ephedra contributed to the deaths of Baltimore Orioles pitcher Steve Bechler and Minnesota Vikings player Korey Stringer.* Additionally, there are numerous stories of amateur athletes who took this supplement and experienced serious health problems.
·******* It is my hope that this legislation will ensure that all Americans, including athletes, have all the information necessary to make informed decision when choosing whether to use a dietary supplement, and that the FDA has the ability to remove any harmful dietary supplements from the market.*
**

*

#* #* #
*

*
 
Last edited:

Double_A

TB Fanatic
All McCain needs to do to clarify things is change the words "dietary supplement" to "weight-loss supplement".

I take lots of things to supplement what I consider a nutritionally incomplete diet, I take nothing to induce weight loss.

But then that could be his entire intent to obscure and mislead.
 

kozanne

Inactive

Not intentionally derailing the thread, but I note that Arpaio came out for JD this morning. That spells some serious trouble for McCain in a big way. Despite the media, the people of Maricopa County continue to re-elect Mr. Arpaio and this is an important endorsement.

I think McCain might start to see the handwriting on the wall.

Frankly, I don't know how much better JD will be, but I will be finding out in the very near future.
 

Ben Sunday

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Double A makes a good point. Some specificity would a long way.

Speaking of specifics, I see no mention of Codex or prescriptions anywhere in this thread...with the exception of the "alert" posted
in the OP.

I take a bunch of supplements, and would not appreciate them being taken away. What I see here is an attempt to put regulations in place to make a straighter legal line between an unsafe or clearly speculative product (weight loss and body building stuff would be excellent examples) and the ability to control it.

I have to go dig out the link for what, the third time? Codex Commission itself states they have NO AUTHORITY IN LAW to do any of this.
 

Ben Sunday

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Adding comments and link to support my previous statement. I want to be absolutely clear that I am NOT supporting Codex, McCain, or any organization with their hair or other body parts on fire. It is a real PITA to see Codex dragged off the shelf everytime a story like this hits circulation. It obfuscates and distracts and therefore serves no useful purpose.

Here is the Codex Q&A on control of supplements. Click on a line of text to go to the answers for that line, or just read it here.

>>>

http://www.codexalimentarius.net/web/faq_rum.jsp#R1

FAQs - RUMOURS



R1: Will Codex make all nutritional supplements only available by prescription? Will Codex ban all supplements and make vitamins illegal the same way heroin is illegal? Will all natural herbs and alternative remedies be banned by Codex?

These are some of the many unfounded rumours about Codex that can be found on the internet. The Guidelines for Vitamin and Mineral Food Supplements (CAC/GL 55-2005) adopted in 2005 do not contain provisions for the prescription or prohibition of any nutrient supplements. They do not deal with natural herbs and remedies at all (see also W1)

R2: Is it true that Codex was created by a former war criminal to control the world food supply?

No. It is a false claim. You just need to type the words "Codex Alimentarius" in any search engine and you will find lots lots of these rumours about Codex. Usually the people spreading them will give no proof but will ask you to send donations or to sign petitions against Codex.

Truthful information about Codex is found on Internet (www.codexalimentarius.net) - there is nothing to hide from our side - we are a public institution working in public for the public - we are happy if people want to know more about our work and ask questions. There is an official Codex Contact Point in each member country (www.codexalimentarius.net/web/members.jsp) who will be pleased to answer your questions on Codex

R3: Why are there so many rumours about Codex on the internet? Where do they come from?

These rumours started some years back when one of Codex Committees began work on guidelines for vitamin and mineral supplements (see W1). They appear to be linked to advocacy groups who wrongly believe that Codex is a threat to freedom of choice especially concerning vitamin and mineral supplements (see also R1). These rumours are self-reproducing through chain email messages and other low-cost means of communication.

R4: Why would so many people believe the rumours about Codex and not check the facts?

Good health is foundation of human life. People today are very concerned about their health and they are often confused by conflicting messages in the media on what they should eat to keep healthy. People's legitimate interest in health may be easily exploited by certain groups which claim that there is an international conspiracy with Codex at the centre. This will get them attention, support and donations. As Codex Alimentarius is relatively unknown to consumers, many of them accept or start to believe the anti-Codex campaign messages without asking for proof, which is regrettable.

R5: There must be something to all these rumours about Codex - there are so many people believing them. How can I know whom to trust?

The Internet is a vast storage of information and it contains truth and lies next to each other, without a guide telling you what is wrong and what is right. In the end you will have to make your own decision on whom to believe. All information about Codex work since 1962 can be found on the Codex website. It may take you some time to find the information you are looking for in the Codex website, but all is there and we are continuously working to improve the website and make it more user-friendly. Those who are spreading rumours are mainly interested in donations - the more they scare people, the more they get donations. When deciding whom to believe, you only need to be critical on both sides - we do not mind because we have nothing to hide.

R6: Will Codex require all fruits and vegetables even organically grown ones to be irradiated and sprayed with pesticides?

No. Codex guidelines and standards deal with the safe and appropriate use of irradiation and pesticides. Codex does not prescribe the use of these techniques which is up to national legislation.

At the moment, the market for irradiated food is very small and its use is mainly for herbs and spices (see the video "The pepper trail" for more information about spices http://www.youtube.com/CodexAlim).
R7: Is it true that cattle worldwide are to be treated with growth hormones?

There are no prescriptions in Codex standards and guidelines on treating or not treating cattle with hormones. Codex has established maximum residue values for a number of veterinary drugs in order to make sure that their residues do not raise health concern where they are used.

R8: Is it true that the permitted amount of the carcinogenic substance Aflatoxin is going to be raised?

No. Codex has established safety limits for this contaminant in different foods and has also worked out codes of practice for producers to avoid and reduce such contamination. It is our goal to scientifically establish how much is safe and how to reduce contamination. Codex work on contaminants, food additives and veterinary drug residues is scientifically supported by the rigorous risk assessment conducted by a scientific expert body of FAO and WHO - Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives, known as JECFA. For more information about aflatoxins, please refer to reports of the Committee on Contaminants in Foods and the Codex General Standard for Contaminants and Toxins in Foods.

R9: Is it true that the labelling of GM food is going to be cancelled?
There are presently no Codex provisions for the labelling of GM foods except in the case of possible allergic reactions. The work on finding an international consensus on how to proceed with the labelling of GM Food has proven difficult because of quite opposed opinions in the world. As there has been no consensus for some time some countries suggested stopping this work but others would like to continue so the discussion continues. International consensus is not an easy thing! For further information please read reports of the Committee on Food Labelling.

R10: Is it true that any advice on nutrition and nutritional values published in print media or internet is going to be made illegal?
There are several Codex texts giving guidance on nutrition claims to avoid that consumers are misled with false claims on food labels. These issues are discussed by the Codex Committee on Food Labelling. There has never been any talk about making any truthful information illegal nor could this be done by Codex, as all Codex texts are voluntary.

R11: Is it correct that certain diseases such as cancer, heart disease and diabetes are caused by food denaturized by Codex?
Non-communicable diseases such as cancer and heart disease are in fact a growing concern in the world and their causes are now understood somewhat better. Research by WHO shows that some of these diseases may be partly caused by life style changes (e.g. unhealthy diets, lack of physical exercise) both in the developed and the developing world.

A well-balanced diet composed of safe and nutritious foods is recommended to reduce risks of non-communicable diseases. Codex can help consumers to make an informed choice of foods they buy and eat, but it is up to consumers themselves to constitute their own diet.

Two Codex Committees work actively to assist the WHO Global Strategy on Diet Physical Activity and Health to ensure that consumers get the right information about nutrients and can make healthy choices
(http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/en/).
R12: I have heard that the Codex will become law on 31 December 2009. Is it true?

This is an unfounded rumour: The standards, guidelines and codes adopted by the Codex Alimentarius Commission are voluntary and do not therefore contain implementation deadlines or dates, nor can the Commission turn them into binding law.

<<<
 

scandiwoman

scandiwoman
The following article on Codex was written in 2007 by someone who is directly involved in the Nutraceutical Industry.


=Codex Alimentarius=


The Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC) was established by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the World Health Organization (WHO) in 1963 under the direct influence of the Pharmaceutical Industry. The CAC has developed “food standards”, “guidelines” and “codes of practice” for the member countries of the World Trade Organization (WTO), making it impossible for poor countries to fulfill such unnecessarily high standards, thereby excluding them from “free trade”.


The Pharmaceutical Industry uses the CAC as a way to render illegal all natural alternative therapies that are not patentable. An excellent example of this is Red Rice Yeast Extract, which was banned due to its effectiveness in reducing blood fats, having been deemed a serious threat to the sales of the patented statin drugs that generate billions of dollars. The Red Rice Yeast Extract on the market today has been altered and does not contain the active compound thereby making it completely worthless. It is very apparent that the intention of the CAC is to protect corporate interests of the international pharmaceutical and food markets.


The European Union (EU) is moving quickly to protect its multi-billion dollar pharmaceutical market. The EU is using its 25 members within CAC to impose strict guidelines on all essential nutrients. It appears that what the EU is doing is going to become the blueprint for international regulatory control of all dietary supplements through the WTO.


The WTO is an utterly diabolical and extremely sinister organization, for under the guise of having been established for the purpose to resolve international “trade disputes”, it can effectively render the domestic laws of a member country null and void, thereby forcing an adherence to the CAC guidelines.


The CAC’s current proposal suggests the following:


#1: No dietary supplement is to be sold for preventative or therapeutic use.


#2: All new dietary supplements will be banned unless they have undergone extensive CAC testing via “scientific risk assessment” and final approval.


#3: The only dietary supplements allowed will be in ultra-low potencies from the so-called “Positives List”, and can only be made from a list of 13 vitamins and 15 minerals.


#4: No dietary supplement sold as food can exceed the dosages as established by the CAC.


#5: All dietary supplements of higher potency are to be sold as “drugs” by the pharmaceutical companies.


#6: All dietary supplements without a recommended daily allowance (RDA), such as Coenzyme Q10, will be illegal to sell because is will be considered a “drug”.


#7: The CAC regulations for all dietary supplements will become legally binding via the WTO.


By the year 2010…


The CAC will expressly forbid the use of nutrients to “prevent, treat or cure any condition”.


The CAC will officially classify all botanicals (herbs) and natural substances as “untested drugs” and their use will be forbidden in all member countries of the WTO.


The CAC will deem all Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) to be legal in all foods and under all circumstances.


The CAC will set permissible upper levels for pesticide residues, toxic chemicals, hormones in food, as well as various environmental contaminants that are many times greater than what exist today.


The CAC will mandate that all animal feed be treated with antibiotics, hormones and growth stimulants.


The CAC will mandate the irradiation of all food.


Please consider this very carefully...Codex Alimentarius is real and all countries that are members of the WTO will be forced to abide by the CAC Regulations. The CAC, as well as its proposals are totally draconian and represent a very sinister intent that concerns many alternative health care advocates.
 

Cheval

Inactive
Got this in a LEF email today:

Don’t Give the FDA More Power to Ban Our Supplements!

In response to our alert last week, more Life Extension® members than ever before contacted their Senators to protest a bill that would give the FDA draconian new powers.

This week, I will answer some questions and concerns that well-meaning individuals have expressed about this bill and our hardline position against it.

This bill is called The Dietary Supplement Safety Act (DSSA), which is a misleading title because it purports that there are lethal problems associated with dietary supplements. The reality is the FDA has all the power it needs now to protect the public against supplements that are spiked with prescription drugs, or otherwise adulterated.

The Dietary Supplement Safety Act will give the FDA discretionary authority to ban any supplement it chooses. What some have yet to comprehend is the horrific way the FDA has historically abused powers Congress bestows them.

By way of example, we at Life Extension were subjected to a rigorous inspection by the FDA in year 2003. The FDA investigator spent an inordinate amount of time reviewing our eye drop products. When we asked why out of all our products the eye drops were being so heavily scrutinized, the response was “because I can.”

What this FDA agent was telling us was that since the passage of the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 (DSHEA), the FDA’s power to regulate dietary supplements was limited. This act did not apply to eye drops. The result was that our statements about eye drop products could be censored, and since the FDA had the power to do it, they used it.

Until you’ve been on the front line, it is difficult to imagine the egregious ways that government agencies abuse their powers.

I was in a Walgreens last week picking up some pictures, when a recorded voice came on to the store’s speaker system announcing the heart healthy benefits of fish oil and CoQ10.

This brought a flashback to the year 1987 when FDA agents stormed Life Extension’s premises and seized these supplements, along with a brochure that described how they could help protect against heart attack.

Accompanied by armed US marshals, I vividly recall FDA agents ridiculing me about the concept that fish oil had any relationship to cardiac disorders. The sad fact in this story is the millions of heart attacks suffered by Americans because the FDA had the power for so long to censor the truth about omega-3 supplements.


Before DSHEA was passed in 1994, the FDA routinely seized dietary supplements when a health claim was made. Some individuals have apparently forgotten the past and are determined to relive it by not understanding the unintended consequences of the Dietary Supplement Safety Act of 2010.

I have brought out these real-world examples to better enable everyone to understand the dangers of giving an agency like the FDA discretionary authority, defined in this new bill as “reasonable probability,” to remove dietary supplements from the marketplace. As I stated last week:

“The FDA already has broad powers to remove dangerous products. This legislation would enable the FDA to ban anything if they have only ‘reasonable probability’ that there is a serious problem with a product. This kind of discretionary authority gives the FDA tyrannical power to ban supplements, a power they have not hesitated to use when they’ve had it.”

-----------------------------------------------------

He was ridiculed because the federal law agencies are there to protect the interests and money of the pharmaceutical companies, not our health. Follow the money.... :kk1:
 
Top