WEATHER History Channel Documentary Validates Chemtrails and Weather Warfare

G

gelatinous

Eyes WIDE Open
I normally take Alex Jones with a grain of salt, but this History channel video is very well done. Probably most of us have seen chem-trails, I spot them very often above our place as we are on under the major flight paths for west coast flights. It's easy to spot a normal contrail as they don't linger to long, but the chemtrails linger and dissipate in a strange pattern. Even when mixed with normal contrails.

http://www.infowars.com/history-channel-documentary-validates-chemtrails-and-weather-warfare/
 
F

fredkc

Retired Class Clown
I DVR'd "Weather Warfare" middle of last week, and have told 20+ people, so far, to watch it. It is a great "primer" on what HAARP can/is doing.

By the way, it will air one more time, this week on the History Channel. It airs today, Saturday, at 1:00 PM PDT on the HD version of the channel.

Before this gets shuttled off to one the "wacko forums";
This isn't simply some "tin foil hat" issue. There are 12-15 HAARP facilities operated by various countries world-wide, and these are just the ones they'll admit to.

It is actually open warfare with complete deniability, and zero residual evidence.

For those with "no life" and an interest, here is the HAARP patent.
 
CelticRose

CelticRose

Inactive
fredkc said:
I DVR'd "Weather Warfare" middle of last week, and have told 20+ people, so far, to watch it. It is a great "primer" on what HAARP can/is doing.

By the way, it will air one more time, this week on the History Channel. It airs today, Saturday, at 1:00 PM PDT on the HD version of the channel.

Before this gets shuttled off to one the "wacko forums";
This isn't simply some "tin foil hat" issue. There are 12-15 HAARP facilities operated by various countries world-wide, and these are just the ones they'll admit to.

It is actually open warfare with complete deniability, and zero residual evidence.

For those with "no life" and an interest, here is the HAARP patent.
Click to expand...

Watched the clip on Alex Jones site and it looks very interesting and well made.

It's going to air here on the east coast at 4 pm

A snippet fron the History Channel site ...........

............The power to use tornados, hurricanes and the deadliest weather as weapons of war may now be possible. We'll investigate reports that weather weapons are in development and reveal the technology that--in the future--could turn hurricanes, earthquakes, even tsunamis into some of the most powerful and plausibly deniable weapons of mass destruction the world has ever seen.

http://www.history.com/shows.do?action=detail&episodeId=464914
 
G

gelatinous

Eyes WIDE Open
fredkc said:
I DVR'd "Weather Warfare" middle of last week, and have told 20+ people, so far, to watch it. It is a great "primer" on what HAARP can/is doing.

By the way, it will air one more time, this week on the History Channel. It airs today, Saturday, at 1:00 PM PDT on the HD version of the channel.

Before this gets shuttled off to one the "wacko forums";
This isn't simply some "tin foil hat" issue. There are 12-15 HAARP facilities operated by various countries world-wide, and these are just the ones they'll admit to.

It is actually open warfare with complete deniability, and zero residual evidence.

For those with "no life" and an interest, here is the HAARP patent.
Click to expand...


Thanks fredkc! I'm going to set up the DVR to record that.

I had heard of the HAARP in Russia, but had not idea there were that many worldwide. I'm going to have to do a little more research into that.

By the way neat site you have there.
 
SIRR1

SIRR1

Inactive
I watched the program and then watched the TiVo'ed program and I do say they made a good argument, but with no real facts to back up the shows claims I can only say it made for a couple of hours well spent!

SIRR1
 
F

fredkc

Retired Class Clown
By the way neat site you have there.
Click to expand...
Ty very much. Enjoy ;)

Correction: they stated that there are at least 20 known devices of this type operating.

"The present invention provides a method and apparatus for altering at least one selected region which normally exists above the earth's surface. The region is excited by electron cyclotron resonance heating of electrons which are already present and/or artifically created in the region to thereby increase the charged particle energy and ultimately the density of the region. This effectively "lifts" a layer of plasma from the ionosphere and/or magnetosphere to a higher elevation"


Where I am going with this... it may be that, when government says they're not doing it to us, they may be telling a "very limited" form of the truth. Or let's say that, what "falls on people" is of no concern to them, just a side effect of what it takes to make HAARP more effective.

From HAARP's Patent:
It has also been proposed to release large clouds of barium in the magnetosphere so that photoionization will increase the cold plasma density, thereby producing electron precipitation through enhanced whistler-mode interactions.

However, in all of the above-mentioned approaches, the mechanisms involved in triggering the change in the trapped particle phenomena must be actually positioned within the affected zone, e.g., the magnetosphere, before they can be actuated to effect the desired change.
Click to expand...

The idea being to spray this crap at very high altitudes "cheaply" (using planes), and then use HAARP's ability to "lift" the stuff to higher altitudes. This increases the amount of high altitude matter making HAARP even more effective.

If you still think this is the stuff of "tin foil hats", here are some of the things HAARP can do, right from the patent doc.:
  • a substantial amount of randomly modulated signals of very large power magnitude can be generated in a highly nonlinear mode. This can cause confusion of or interference with or even complete disruption of guidance systems employed by even the most sophisticated of airplanes and missiles.
  • The ability to employ and transmit over very wide areas of the earth a plurality of electromagnetic waves of varying frequencies and to change same at will in a random manner, provides a unique ability to interfere with all modes of communications, land, sea, and/or air, at the same time.
  • This invention has a phenomenal variety of possible ramifications and potential future developments. As alluded to earlier, missile or aircraft destruction, deflection, or confusion could result, particularly when relativistic particles are employed.
  • Also, large regions of the atmosphere could be lifted to an unexpectedly high altitude so that missiles encounter unexpected and unplanned drag forces with resultant destruction or deflection of same.
  • Weather modification is possible by, for example, altering upper atmosphere wind patterns or altering solar absorption patterns by constructing one or more plumes of atmospheric particles which will act as a lens or focusing device.
  • Besides actually changing the molecular composition of an atmospheric region, a particular molecule or molecules can be chosen for increased presence. For example, ozone, nitrogen, etc. concentrations in the atmosphere could be artificially increased.
  • Similarly, environmental enhancement could be achieved by causing the breakup of various chemical entities such as carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, nitrous oxides, and the like.

    [Note: If you wanted to make a case that the "carbon tax" is just another way to fleece people, there it is. - Fred]

  • For example, the plasma sheath surrounding a missile or satellite could be used as a trigger for activating such a high intensity field to destroy the missile or satellite.
  • Further, irregularities can be created in the ionosphere which will interfere with the normal operation of various types of radar, e.g., synthetic aperture radar.
  • Still further, plumes in accordance with the present invention can be formed to simulate and/or perform the same functions as performed by the detonation of a "heave" type nuclear device without actually having to detonate such a device.
That last one should make Tesla spin in his grave.

When you measure the number, and types of things that can be done with HAARP, and remember that was "state of the art" in 1985, then weigh them against the idea it makes people sick, I don't think there's a government on this planet that wouldn't say, "So what?"
 
G

gelatinous

Eyes WIDE Open
The Russians were really nervous about HAARP also.

From the Wiki:

"the U.S. is creating new integral geophysical weapons that may influence the near-Earth medium with high-frequency radio waves ... The significance of this qualitative leap could be compared to the transition from cold steel to firearms, or from conventional weapons to nuclear weapons. This new type of weapons differs from previous types in that the near-Earth medium becomes at once an object of direct influence and its component."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Frequency_Active_Auroral_Research_Program
 
penumbra

penumbra

centrist member
gelatinous said:
The Russians were really nervous about HAARP also.

From the Wiki:

"the U.S. is creating new integral geophysical weapons that may influence the near-Earth medium with high-frequency radio waves ... The significance of this qualitative leap could be compared to the transition from cold steel to firearms, or from conventional weapons to nuclear weapons. This new type of weapons differs from previous types in that the near-Earth medium becomes at once an object of direct influence and its component."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Frequency_Active_Auroral_Research_Program
Click to expand...

Hah, maybe, but they had the "Russian Woodpecker".

(You've got some great info on this thread.)
 
F

fredkc

Retired Class Clown
penumbra said:
Hah, maybe, but they had the "Russian Woodpecker".
(You've got some great info on this thread.)
Click to expand...

The Russians built theirs first, actually.

Two "coincidences" from that program:
1. That the years the "woodpecker" was operating, a high pressure zone parked itself just offshore of Califoirnia, causing a 4 year drought. One of our worst on record.

Also, once ours came online, the woodpecker stopped, and so did California's drought.

2. The year after Katrina, a large high parked itself off the east coast, turning away every hurricane that came our way. the same high appeared every year for the next three years, as well.

NC Susan;
I just checked the listing for next week, and it isn't on the schedule. But...

It's the History channel. the show is called That's Impossible, and the episode is called Weather Warfare. Hist. channel tends to re-run things quite a bit, so I'll keep checking. I just searched YouTune and did come up with a link for it, there, in several parts: http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=AD7214A816B2121D&search_query=weather+warfare
 
F

fredkc

Retired Class Clown
changed said:
What does the History Channel say is the purpose of chemtrails?
Click to expand...

From HAARP's Patent:
It has also been proposed to release large clouds of barium in the magnetosphere so that photoionization will increase the cold plasma density, thereby producing electron precipitation through enhanced whistler-mode interactions.

The program speculated along the same lines as the patent statements, really.

Chemtrails as a means of getting particles up into the atmosphere. HAARP can then "raise them" by two means: electromagnetic, and thermal.

The idea is that, the higher the altitude, the more sparse matter becomes, and so the less efficient HAARP becomes. Chemtrails then become a means to add matter, giving HAARP a stronger effect.

Going back to published HAARP data, once sprayed, the material can be kept up there "from several hours, up to a full solar cycle at the poles" or basically an "Arctic day".This last bit I found at: http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp
 
SIRR1

SIRR1

Inactive
chemtrails

changed said:
What does the History Channel say is the purpose of chemtrails?
Click to expand...

Climate control.

Also,

IMHO parking a high pressure zone or blocking a hurricane from hitting a certain area can't be good for the earth and eventully it's going to come back and bite us in the ass if were not carefull.

Because I was under the impression that hurricanes are mother natures way of cooling off hot spots on the globe?

What will happen if these hot areas are not cooled off...

I wonder if the Gulf of Mexico's dead zone will only get bigger if the area is not hit by an occasional tropical storm or hurricane to mix up the water, just a thought.

http://serc.carleton.edu/microbelife/topics/deadzone/

SIRR1
 
denfoote

denfoote

Inactive
Weather no. Earthquake yes!!


HAARP generates ELF.

These frequencies are at or near the natural frequency of rock!

Tune the thing to the natural frequency of the sub strata in the the country you want to have an earthquake in, aim it (sorta like dopler radar), flip the switch, let run for awhile, then presto, instant earthquake!!

Nikola Tesla established a laboratory on Houston Street in New York at 46 E. There, at one point while experimenting with mechanical oscillators, he allegedly generated a resonance of several buildings causing complaints to the police. As the speed grew he hit the resonance frequency of his own building and belatedly realizing the danger he was forced to apply a sledge hammer to terminate the experiment, just as the astonished police arrived.[5] The Discovery Channel's popular MythBusters show examined Tesla's claim that he had created an "Earthquake Machine" in their 60th episode. They tested the physical phenomenon known as mechanical resonance on a traffic bridge, which today are built to withstand such forces. While a single I-beam of steel was deflected several feet in each direction by their oscillator, and they reportedly felt the bridge shaking many yards away, there were no "earth shattering" effects. It is worth indicating that, in the time of the event undertaken by Tesla, buildings were not built to withstand such resonance.

[edit]
Click to expand...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mechanical_resonance

Any second year Mechanical Engineering student, with some imagination, could, in principle, build the thing!!

As an exercise, I had to calculate the natural frequency of granite. It turned out to be in the ELF range!!!

Like an idiot, I left my Vibrations text in my car!!! :whistle:

Otherwise, I'd be able to post the relevant equations.
 
Last edited:
F

fredkc

Retired Class Clown
Denfoote;

1952: W.O. Schumann identifies 7.83 Hertz resonant frequency of the earth.

Ref: Angels Don't Play This HAARP Page 1, Dr Nick Begish


Approx 1997: a Dr. Agnew, doing thomographic mapping in Oregon, is convinced he started a 4.5 quake.

Ref: the Weather Warfare episode. In it, he also duplicates the event using a geological model of a thrust fault, and 30 watts of ELF pulses.
 
denfoote

denfoote

Inactive
fredkc said:
Denfoote;

1952: W.O. Schumann identifies 7.83 Hertz resonant frequency of the earth.

Ref: Angels Don't Play This HAARP Page 1, Dr Nick Begish


Approx 1997: a Dr. Agnew, doing thomographic mapping in Oregon, is convinced he started a 4.5 quake.

Ref: the Weather Warfare episode. In it, he also duplicates the event using a geological model of a thrust fault, and 30 watts of ELF pulses.
Click to expand...

I'v never read the book, but I put it togerher years ago and I'm just a lowly Electronic Technician!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top