CRIME Obama has used 39 social security numbers

following some of Flippers leads, I found this


http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread480978/pg1


I read the entire lawsuit that was filed in federal court. The real surprise was on page 9 & 10 where I found the following:

“The evidence contained in exhibit B shows that Barrak Hussein Obama might have used as many as 149 addresses and 39 Social Security Numbers prior to assuming office as president. The Social Security number most commonly used by Barrak Hussein Obama is one issued by the state of Connecticut, the state where Barrak Hussein Obama never resided and shows him to be 119 years old.

This coupled with the fact that Mr Obama’s grandmother, Madeline Dunham was a volunteer at the Oahu Circuit Court Probate department and had access to the Social Security Numbers of the deceased, constitutes circumstantial evidence casting serious doubt on the legitimacy of Mr Obama and his claims of being born on U.S. territory.”

The suit was filed in the Federal District court in Columbus Ga.
by attorney Orly Taitz. I personally cannot imagine that any attorney would file such a lawsuit with the allegations about the misuse of Social Security numbers and include a list of the numbers as an appendix to the lawsuit if the information had not been thoroughly investigated.

Maybe.. Just Maybe this story will get legs and help stop this national nightmare we are in.

The additional link is to the full text of the lawsuit.


www.freerepublic.com
(visit the link for the full news article)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2289990/posts

[SIZE=+1]MAJOR STEFAN FREDERICK COOK v [et. al] (RE: Obama eligibility - Dr. Taitz)[/SIZE]
7/10/2009 | rxsid
Posted on Friday, July 10, 2009 6:22:39 PM by rxsid
"MAJOR STEFAN FREDERICK COOK, Plaintiff,
v.
COLONEL WANDA L. GOOD, COLONEL THOMAS D. MACDONALD, DR. ROBERT M. GATES, UNITED § STATES SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, Rule 65(b) Application for BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, de facto Temporary Restraining Order PRESIDENT of the UNITED STATES, Defendants.

APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
Plaintiff Major Stefan Frederick Cook has received from the Defendants in this cause what appear to be facially valid orders mobilizing him to active duty with the United States Army in Afghanistan on July 15, 2009 (Exhibit A).
AN OFFICER’S DUTY TO OBEY LAWFUL ORDERS: This Plaintiff, at the time of his original induction, took the United States military oath, which reads: "I, Stefan Frederick Cook, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to the regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God" Title 10, Subtitle A, Part II of the United States Code contains the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). 10 U.S.C. §890 (ART.90), makes it an offence subject to court-martial if any military personnel “willfully disobeys a lawful command of his superior commissioned officer," 10 U.S.C. §891 (ART.91) "lawful order of a warrant officer", and most importantly, 10 U.S.C. §892 (ART.92) provides court-martial for any officer who (1) violates or fails to obey any lawful general order or regulation; (2) having knowledge of any other lawful order issued by a member of the armed forces, which it is his duty to obey, fails to obey the order; or (3) is derelict in the performance of his duties; In each case, Plaintiff submits that it is implicit though not expressly stated that an officer is and should be subject to court-martial, because he will be derelict in the performance of his duties, if he does not inquire as to the lawfulness, the legality, the legitimacy of the orders which he has received, whether those orders are specific or general. Unfortunately the Uniform Code of Military Justice does not provide a means for ascertaining the legality of orders, and accordingly, this Plaintiff is left with no choice but recourse to the ordinary civil courts of the United States to seek a determination of what he considers to be a question of paramount constitutional and legal importance: the validity of the chain of command under a President whose election, eligibility, and constitutional status appear open to serious question.

Plaintiff Major Stefan Frederick Cook is not a pacifist. He does not object to war or the use of military force in the implementation of national policy or the enforcement of international law. Above all, Plaintiff is not a coward, he is not engaged in mutiny, sedition, insubordination, contempt, disrespect, or any kind of resistance to any general or specific lawful order of which he knows or has received notice. Plaintiff Major Stefan Frederick Cook realizes and accepts as a matter of political reality (although it is very hard for him to bear personally) that many may criticize or even shun him, saying that he is not acting in the best interests of his country for trying to uphold the plain letter of the Constitution. Others may cynically ridicule this Plaintiff when, as an officer responsible not only to obey those above him but to protect those under his command, he comes to this Court asking for the right to establish the legality of orders received not only for his own protection, but for the protection of all enlisted men and women who depend on HIS judgment that the orders he follows are legal. Above all, when Plaintiff Major Stefan Frederick Cook submits and contends that he files and will prosecute this lawsuit and seeks an injunction or temporary restraining order against the enforcement of potentially illegal orders for the benefit of all servicemen and women and for the benefit all officers in all branches of the U.S. Military, he knows that those in power illegitimately may seek to injure his career. He knows that he risks all and he does so in the conscientious belief that he does so for not merely his own, but the general good. But Plaintiff cannot escape from the mandates of his conscience and his awareness, his educated consciousness, that all military personnel but especially commissioned officers have an obligation and a duty to only obey Lawful orders and indeed have an obligation to disobey Unlawful orders, including orders by the president that do not comply with the UCMJ. The moral and legal obligation is to the U.S. Constitution and not to those who would issue unlawful orders, especially if those orders are in direct violation of the Constitution and the UCMJ.

NEVER BEFORE IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES
Plaintiff presents the key question in this case as one of first impression, never before decided in the history of the United States: Is an officer entitled to refuse orders on grounds of conscientious objection to the legitimate constitutional authority of the current de facto Commander-in-Chief? In the alternative, is an officer entitled to a judicial stay of the enforcement of facially valid military orders where that officer can show evidence that the chain-of-command from the commander-in-chief is tainted by illegal activity? ..."

http://www.scribd.com/doc/17266905/05311066823

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/

actual legal brief, all 26 pages, filed on July 9, 2009 available here:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/17266905/05311066823

Maybe that's what those transcripts would have shown. It used to be common to use SSN on various documents.

More from Dr. Taitz... Cook v Good et al
I will post the pleadings, but the case filed on behalf of Major Cook, states that he is being deployed to Afghanistan and he is seeking a TRO (it is like a stay) of his deployment until Obama’s legitimacy (eligibility ) for presidency is ascertained. The judge is Federal District Judge for the middle district of GA -Clay D. Land.
If you want to write to the judge it is as follows:
Federal District Judge Clay D. Land
Middle District of Georgia
Columbus Division
PO Box 124
Columbus GA 31902
Defendants in this case are the supervising officers Col Wanda Good (hence the name of the case Cook v Good), Col Macdonald, in their capacity as commanding officers, Dr. Gates in his capacity of the Secretary of Defence and Barack Hussein Obama-de facto president of the United states.
Officer Cook is not only a highly decorated officer, being on staff of the Southern Command, he is also a family man, a father of a 16 y.o. and a highly educated professonal with the degrees in Economics, Business and Management.
His grave concern is about soldiers under his command, all US officers and enlisted and about our children- what future will they have, when the person sitting in the White House as the commander in chief, is consealing all his vital records, spends over a million dollars to seal an otiginal birth certificate, that costs $12 to produce, who has multiple social security numbers in National databases and statements of experts, showing multiple signs of forgery in his Certification of live birth and selective service sertificate.
Orly
PS computer screen on my laptop cracked on the flight from MO, can’t see half of what I am writing, so my apology for any mistakes.
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=2976

bw said:

Maybe that's what those transcripts would have shown. It used to be common to use SSN on various documents.

Click to expand...

If Obama is known to be using 39 social security numbers, that may explain why the State lost/suspended his license to practice law in the State of Illinois

DON'T YOU REMEMBER OJ?

They could have had High Definition video of OJ
sawing his ex wife's head off, and it still wouldn't have
mattered.

Obama is in and he'll stay in until he disobeys orders.
He didn't get where he is by deviating from the game plan.

I'd love to see him sprout a pair and become a loose cannon.

I don't think massive black rioting would stop TPTB from
sending him to meet Abe and Jack.

Susan,

Thanks for staying on top of this issue. I am very interested to see what becomes of this--perhaps nothing directly but it will fuel the fire at the least.
This is precisely what some of us here predicted at the time of the inauguration--that the military would challenge his orders. I am very happy to see it.

I though only his wife had been disbarred. He was as well? Slippery pair, indeed.

BlueNewton said:

.........I though only his wife had been disbarred. He was as well? Slippery pair, indeed.

Click to expand...

https://www.iardc.org/ardcroll.asp
https://www.iardc.org/ardcroll.asp

I took a look at page 26 and found just the title. Do you know where I could get a list of the 35 SS numbers and addresses?

Well...chap my hide!

LAWYER SEARCH RESULTS

ARDC Lawyer Search Results from the ARDC database last updated as of July 10, 2009 at 12:30:18 PM: for the following terms: Last Name: Obama, First Name: Barack, status: All, Country: all
Name Date Admitted City State Authorized to Practice?
Barack Hussein Obama December 17, 1991 N/A N/A No

Address information is not available online for retired judges or lawyers who are retired, inactive, deceased or who never registered with ARDC, due to privacy considerations or because ARDC never received those addresses. For those lawyers, "N/A" is displayed above to indicate that the city and state information is not available online. Click on the name of a lawyer to obtain more detailed information regarding the lawyer, including registration status, registered business address and telephone number if available, and any public disciplinary or disability history.

LAWYER SEARCH RESULTS

ARDC Lawyer Search Results from the ARDC database last updated as of July 10, 2009 at 12:30:18 PM: for the following terms:
Last Name: Obama, First Name: Michelle, status: All, Country: all
Name Date Admitted City State Authorized to Practice?
Michelle Obama
Former name(s):
Michelle Robinson May 12, 1989 N/A N/A No

Address information is not available online for retired judges or lawyers who are retired, inactive, deceased or who never registered with ARDC, due to privacy considerations or because ARDC never received those addresses. For those lawyers, "N/A" is displayed above to indicate that the city and state information is not available online. Click on the name of a lawyer to obtain more detailed information regarding the lawyer, including registration status, registered business address and telephone number if available, and any public disciplinary or disability history.

Hmmmm...so, are they license to practice law someplace besides their home state of Illinois?

"The Social Security number most commonly used by Barrak Hussein Obama is one issued by the state of Connecticut."

States don't issue social security numbers. Right?

NC Susan said:

If Obama is known to be using 39 social security numbers, that may explain why the State lost/suspended his license to practice law in the State of Illinois

Click to expand...

SO he lost his right to practice law in ILL.interesting for sure. this should be made known andright now to the public.
and the reson behindthe states reason for taking his right to practice law away.

But could they have lost their right to practice law in Illinois simply because they chose to no longer practice and didn't renew something? I know nothing whatsoever about maintaining your liscense to practice law, but at least with teachers, your certificate becomes inactive if you fail to meet certain requirements. In my case, I chose to pursue another profession for a while, so I let my certificate go inactive, since I wasn't using it anyways. Don't know if it works in a similar way for lawyers.

Writermom

Inactive is completely different from suspended. Inactive can always be reactivated by paying the fees. Yes, I do know this.

Now I believe that social security numbers differ depending on the state for which they are issued. I think it is the first three numbers that indicate the state. That could be what is meant when it refers to Connecticut. But I am not sure about this.

changed said:

"The Social Security number most commonly used by Barrak Hussein Obama is one issued by the state of Connecticut."

States don't issue social security numbers. Right?

Click to expand...

No, the states don't. But, some of the numbers in the SSN are tied to location and can be predicted. For instance, the 513 in mine, indicates that I was born or issued the number while residing in Kansas.

A recent experiment (that made national news a few days ago) found that with a smidgin of info about a person, along with some credit data, made guessing the person's SSN very probable. Criminals have known this for years, as it turns out. Back in the days of the old-time Fido Net BBS's there was a file floating around on how to create a respectably authentic SSN that would pass a cursory inspection, by making up information about yourself and then issuing the number based on that info... Harder to do now that all kinds of databases are interconnected though.

changed said:

"The Social Security number most commonly used by Barrak Hussein Obama is one issued by the state of Connecticut."

States don't issue social security numbers. Right?

Click to expand...

They aren't issued BY the state, per se. However IIRC the first couple of digits in a social security number indicate the state in which the application fo a social security number, was received.

Example, a person applying for a sociual security number in MN would have a different 'prefix' than a person applying for one from say TX.

Make sense?

http://genealogy.about.com/od/social_security/a/numbers.htm
like was said its the 1st 3 numbers. the above link shows the list which state which numbers.

040-049 Connecticut

Bottom line here,

Ebola is not who, or what he claims to be,, including lawfully holding the office of POTUS.

Obama just gets curiouser and curiouser, and even lawsuits don't seem to air these things out. I believe he will remain in office, too, though EVERYBODY should know about his "so-called past."

BO has now been elevated to felonious fascist freak!

If the report is true, it's explosive and definitely proves Obama is hiding his past.


Rage

True - False (or otherwise???) ... the issues that swirl around the Ever-Brilliant One are better than the Comedy Channel.

changed said:

"The Social Security number most commonly used by Barrak Hussein Obama is one issued by the state of Connecticut."

States don't issue social security numbers. Right?

Click to expand...

The first 3 numbers identify the state of residence when the number was issued. So everyone who is issued a SS # from Connecticut will have the same first 3 numbers, same in every state. I've heard lately that they are running out of numbers in some states so that may be subject to change in the future.

It is explosive.

I am dumbfounded by the audacity and complete contempt for his subjects that must exist for him to perpetuate such a lie.

Lying to the citizens, for example, about the reasons for a war, as a believe Bush did, is bad enough. But lying and saying you are a citizen of that country when you are in fact a foreigner to become its top leader is just beyond comprehension, really.

So does this mean that once this is all settled that all the laws, contracts, agreements and executive orders signed by said person will be null and void?

All of the above had to have been known by certain parties and they kept silent and allowed this to go forward.

Oh boy.......there are going to be a lot of really pissed off citizens when this finally comes to their collective awareness.

Is our entire government a complete dog and pony show.........a complete fraud? I think we know the answer in our hearts.

And the MSM remains blissfully unconcerned about all the valid questions about their chosen one.

For all the money that's been spent by or on his behalf, to cover, obscure, alter and adulterate his past; things still slip out that barry is just unfit, unworthy and unqualified for his current job.

By hey, that's never been an issue in his past so why should it be now?

NC Susan said:

https://www.iardc.org/ardcroll.asp
https://www.iardc.org/ardcroll.asp

Click to expand...

I did a search on both Obamas and a got a message saying "Your search terms do not match the record of any lawyer licensed in Illinois." Not sure why they didn't show up in the records.

Astounding.

Has anyone sent Drudge an email with that info? I bet he could get a reporter to run with it.

Mike

mt4design said:

Astounding.

Has anyone sent Drudge an email with that info? I bet he could get a reporter to run with it.

Mike

Click to expand...

Also send to Alex Jones and Glen Beck.

Where are all the obots saying not this s&%t again? Crickets????

No wonder he's the Prez. I've only used one SSN my whole life. He's like 39 times cooler than me.

If this is true, might this be a felony.

zoose said:

If this is true, might this be a felony.

Click to expand...

No might about it, it definitely is a Felony, and multiple counts, multiplied by every time he has used one that is not his.

Loup

LoupGarou said:

No might about it, it definitely is a Felony, and multiple counts, multiplied by every time he has used one that is not his.

Loup

Click to expand...

Only a felony if someone has the stones to actually enforce the law.

And sad to say, when it comes to your everyday garden variety politicians; it's rare enough for them to be held to the same standard of abiding by the law as mere common folks...... And a world of diffierence when said perp is the anoointed one

The guy is made of TEFLON. None of his crimes seem to stick to him. Real TEFLON DON, that one. I think he is legally and politically indestructible. But, people fall from power in any number of other ways.

LoupGarou said:

No might about it, it definitely is a Felony, and multiple counts, multiplied by every time he has used one that is not his.

Loup

Click to expand...

Considering the number of people here who have advocated and/or have admittedly given out phoney SSNs for a wide variety of reasons, TB is filled with felons.

Looks as though these were official SS numbers, applied for. AFAIK. Are you saying a lot of TB2 members have applied to Social Security numerous times with either the same name or variations thereof?

Any one see aproblem with this

AP - America's president and Africa's son, Barack Obama dashed with pride onto the continent of his ancestors Saturday, challenging its people to shed corruption and conflict in favor of peace. Campaigning to all of Africa, he said "Yes you can."

Click to expand...

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090712/ap_on_go_pr_wh/obama

NC Susan said:

If Obama is known to be using 39 social security numbers, that may explain why the State lost/suspended his license to practice law in the State of Illinois

Click to expand...

I'm in IL and was not aware of this. Can you give a source for your information? I can't imagine IL pulling his license for a little graft and corruption.

regards,

Garryowen