LEGAL Attn Deficit Disorder leads to $1.7 million verdict. Not bad for a day's work.

Troke

Deceased
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/D/DENTAL_STUDENT_DISMISSED?SITE=FLTAM&SECTION=US

Dropped dental student bites back with $1.7M award

By ED WHITE

DETROIT (AP) -- A federal jury awarded more than $1.7 million Tuesday to a former University of Michigan dental student who said she was illegally kicked out of school after she became ensnared in a feud between a dean and faculty members.

The jury said Alissa Zwick's due-process rights were violated when she was dismissed in 2005 after her third year. She had a B average but was told she wasn't performing well in clinical classes.

Zwick claimed she became a target when two professors resisted efforts to accommodate her attention-deficit disorder by giving exams in a separate setting.

An associate dean, Dr. Marilyn Lantz, had a conflict with the professors and used the dispute with Zwick as part of her successful effort to force them out of their positions, the lawsuit said.

But the professors' resignations created a controversy, and Lantz then tried to deflect responsibility for their departure onto Zwick, the lawsuit said.

Lantz warned Zwick not to discuss the matter with other students and then targeted her for "less favorable treatment" than her classmates when Zwick refused to be silenced, the suit said.

"I was used as a tool or pawn by Dr. Lantz," Zwick, 30, said after the verdict.

The dental school has an appeals process for students who are recommended for dismissal, but Zwick's ouster was "rubber-stamped," her attorney Deborah Gordon said.

"Once you're admitted to a public school, you have a property interest," Gordon said. "You can't be dismissed without due process. The jury found the decision was not careful or deliberate."

A message seeking comment was left at Lantz's office. The university said it was disappointed with the verdict.

The school has a responsibility "to exercise careful and deliberate judgment about who should be permitted to graduate from its professional schools," spokeswoman Kelly Cunningham said in a statement.

Lantz was the main defendant, but Gordon expects the university to pay the award. The $1.72 million verdict includes $1 million in punitive damages.

Zwick is pursuing a master's degree in speech pathology at Eastern Michigan University. She was accepted to eight dental schools before choosing Michigan but couldn't get into another after her dismissal.

She has ADD and they are going to give her a drill to bore holes in people's teeth?

Interesting.
 

Cascadians

Leska Emerald Adams
This is awesomely wonderful news! There is far too much discrimination against ppl with disabilities. The fact is, so many ppl now have some type of disability yet so many gifts to give society if they are accommodated in very simple inexpensive ways.

Often disability is seen as weakness and authorities will indeed frame or scapegoat or manipulate or discriminate viciously against anybody perceived as "different."

Soon this injustice will be stamped out. Yea!
 

Dennis Olson

Chief Curmudgeon
_______________
two professors resisted efforts to accommodate her attention-deficit disorder by giving exams in a separate setting.

I see. So this person wanted special consideration? Too bad. Take your exams where everyone else does. *I* have ADD, and I took all my college exams right in the room with everyone else. Because of my ADD, I was usually able to complete even the most difficult exam in about half the time it took most others. Further, I rarely needed to study. My test average was about a B+ through school.

ADD is not a "disability." Autism certainly is, but not ADD. People can and DO cope with it all the time. This person just wanted to play the "legal lottery" and she won. IMO she shouldn't have...
 

Grantbo

Inactive
What's the name of the student again? I want to make sure that I nor any of my family or relations have her work on our teeth; while we still have them. ;)
 

Brutus

Inactive
This is awesomely wonderful news! There is far too much discrimination against ppl with disabilities. The fact is, so many ppl now have some type of disability yet so many gifts to give society if they are accommodated in very simple inexpensive ways.

Often disability is seen as weakness and authorities will indeed frame or scapegoat or manipulate or discriminate viciously against anybody perceived as "different."

Soon this injustice will be stamped out. Yea!
Yeah boy, it's just great how they're accomodating people with disabilities.

:rolleyes:

Tell ya' what.......

Next time they need to haul some hazardous waste past your house I think I'll lobby to let a truck driver who's legally blind without corrective lenses do the hauling.

How does that grab you?

:smkd:

So many libtards, so little time........

:rolleyes:
 

Cascadians

Leska Emerald Adams
" .... legally blind without corrective lenses .... " oh my goodness there are so many ppl who are legally blind without corrective lenses! So they wear their lenses and can see fine and go about their business.

The request for reasonable accommodation is precisely that -- allowance to wear corrective lenses or whatever necessary to perform up to par.

The corrosive discriminatory cruel attitudes only serve to keep society in the primitive dark ages and will also fuel ever bigger lawsuit awards.

The fact is, many 'odd' 'different' ppl have contributed some of the most needed and amazing inventions and discoveries to mankind. Excluding ppl for being "different" only cuts off the nose to spite the face.

Allowing reasonable accommodation hurts no one and allows the most from all to be contributed to society. It is far stupider to prevent the growing legions of disabled from becoming productive citizens and thriving independently and paying taxes etc.
 

mbo

Membership Revoked
I don't think we're getting the whole story here.


And I certainly don't think this warranted such an outrageous award.

I find it less than amusing that some here would think that such awards are a "good thing" - seeing as it's the citizens of the State of Michigan that will pay for this in increased tutition or fees. The University will certainly not force some tenured faculty to cough up this amount.


Get a clue.

:dot5:
 

Brutus

Inactive
" .... legally blind without corrective lenses .... " oh my goodness there are so many ppl who are legally blind without corrective lenses! So they wear their lenses and can see fine and go about their business.

The request for reasonable accommodation is precisely that -- allowance to wear corrective lenses or whatever necessary to perform up to par.

The corrosive discriminatory cruel attitudes only serve to keep society in the primitive dark ages and will also fuel ever bigger lawsuit awards.

The fact is, many 'odd' 'different' ppl have contributed some of the most needed and amazing inventions and discoveries to mankind. Excluding ppl for being "different" only cuts off the nose to spite the face.

Allowing reasonable accommodation hurts no one and allows the most from all to be contributed to society. It is far stupider to prevent the growing legions of disabled from becoming productive citizens and thriving independently and paying taxes etc.
Blah, blah, blah, liberal spew, liberal spew, liberal spew, blah, blah, blah........

:stfu:

The point being: If a truckdriver is legally blind without his/her glasses, he/she can't get a hazmat endorsement on his/her CDL.......AND FOR GOOD F***ING REASON!!!!!

This lowest common denominator/squeaky wheel/whiny liberal bullshit is going to us all killed.

:stfu:
 

Brutus

Inactive
I don't think we're getting the whole story here.


And I certainly don't think this warranted such an outrageous award.

I find it less than amusing that some here would think that such awards are a "good thing" - seeing as it's the citizens of the State of Michigan that will pay for this in increased tutition or fees. The University will certainly not force some tenured faculty to cough up this amount.


Get a clue.

:dot5:
Exactly, mbo.

Nothing but a shakedown for the benefit of a whining libtard.

:sht:
 

Cascadians

Leska Emerald Adams
Brutus, you may not be aware of this, but your post is abusive and worse, not factually accurate.

If you think carefully about demographics, trends and society, you will see that the most conservative approach possible is that each person should pull his own weight and contribute to society fully rather than being a drain or unproductive.

Inaccurate unthinking knee-jerk name-calling is not productive or helpful. It makes you look neanderthal, of low intellectual and emotional intelligence, and displaying poor manners and brutish attitudes towards your fellow humanimals.
 
Top