9-4-08: Obama And DNC Served Today With Berg Lawsuit

Fisher

Fisher

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Fair use
http://clintondems.com/2008/09/senator-obama-you-are-served-on-behalf-of-philip-berg-esq/

SENATOR OBAMA, YOU ARE SERVED ON BEHALF OF PHILIP BERG, ESQ
Posted on September 4th, 2008 by Kelligesq
OBAMA AND DNC SERVED TODAY WITH BERG LAWSUIT:

For Immediate Release: - 09/04/08

SERVICE OF LAWSUIT CHALLENGING SENATOR OBAMA’S RIGHT TO BE A CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT BECAUSE HE DOES NOT MEET THE QUALIFICATIONS HAS BEEN COMPLETED

( Lafayette Hill , Pennsylvania – 09/04/08) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire,
the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging
Senator Obama’s eligibility to serve as President of the United
States, has received confirmation from his Process Service Company
that the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Senator Barack Obama
were served today, September 4, 2008, with the legal documents
pertaining to Berg vs. Obama, Civil Action No. 08-cv-4083. The DNC was
served at 12:00 p.m. and Senator Obama was served at 1:00 p.m. The
U.S. Attorney’s Office accepted service on behalf of
the Federal Elections Committee (FEC) on or about August 22, 2008.
 
Last edited:
Fisher

Fisher

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Fair use
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2075005/posts

Below is a Philip Berg email from a thread on Free Republic.

No, none of the proceeds will be used to support any party. The proceeds donated will strictly be used for this litigation. Legal litigation is extremely expensive, especially when you require Expert testimony, which I am anticipating.

In addition, I just received confirmation that the DNC and Senator Obama were in fact served today, 09/04/2008. The DNC was served at noon and Senator Obama was served at 1:00 p.m. All Defendants have now been served so the case can proceed.

Thank you for your email. Please keep up the great job and continue spreading the word. Together we can make a difference.

Phil Philip J. Berg, Esquire obamacrimes.com
 
Emcomus

Emcomus

<~Knights of Malta
It's ABOUT time! Thought they would have served him before his acceptance speech.
 
Last edited:
CelticRose

CelticRose

Inactive
Good for Berg!!

I still contend that a FOIA search of the passport records of Obamas' mother would show is she left the US while pregnant with Obama and if her passport showed re-entry into the US before or after his birth ......... And since neither she nor his father were serving in the US military nor were ossignment with the US State Dep't, he wouldn't even qualifiy as a natural born US citizen by virture of having been born to US citizens on a US base or counsulate property ......
 
energy_wave

energy_wave

Has No Life - Lives on TB
You know, if it does happen to come to pass that Obama is disqualified, Hillary will fill in the ticket as presidential candidate and it will still be as good if not better.

Better get ready for the riots though. :whistle:
 
Fisher

Fisher

Has No Life - Lives on TB
energy_wave said:
You know, if it does happen to come to pass that Obama is disqualified, Hillary will fill in the ticket as presidential candidate and it will still be as good if not better.

Better get ready for the riots though. :whistle:
Click to expand...

energy_wave,

I could live with four years of Hillary.

I dont think she can beat our team though.

Fisher
 
Rearden Steel

Rearden Steel

Veteran Member
If BHO is ruled to be ineligible, Hilary would RUN from the nomination as quick as she could. The riots would be unbelievable. The democrat party would disintegrate. At least half of them would not show up. She would keep her powder dry and try and come back in four years as the new savior. This time the slogan would be “I Told You So”. RS
 
O

Oilpatch Hand

3-Bomb General, TB2K Army
energy wave said:
You know, if it does happen to come to pass that Obama is disqualified, Hillary will fill in the ticket as presidential candidate and it will still be as good if not better.
Click to expand...

How do you know this? What is the procedure for replacing the ineligible presidential nominee of a party?

Hillary wasn't nominated. The ticket of Soetoro/Biden was. Seems to me that since the convention has already been held, and a presidential and a vice-presidential candidates were nominated, that the VP candidate would become the presumptive presidential nominee in the event of the death/disability/ineligibility of the presidential nominee.

I'll have to admit, however, that I'm having a hard time finding any chapter and verse on this question.
 
A

Army Girl

Inactive
"What is the procedure for replacing the ineligible presidential nominee of a party? "

Good question, we should find out in this election and replace both candidates.
 
N

night driver

ESFP adrift in INTJ sea
The rules, as presented on another thread do NOT include simple progression from VP Candidate to P Candidate.

The Rules require the Democratic Central Committee to meet, and decide either to convene the convention again, OR to decide among the committee to replace the Pres Candidate with a new Pres Candidate. Has NOTHING to do with who ran at that point.
 
BigBadBossyDog

BigBadBossyDog

Inactive
Oilpatch Hand said:
How do you know this? What is the procedure for replacing the ineligible presidential nominee of a party?
Click to expand...

By appointment, not by vote.

Regulations pertaining to replacement of a Democratic Nominee.

In particular, page 19, Section "G" states:

G. Filling a Vacancy on the National Ticket: In the event of death, resignation or disability of a nominee of the Party for President or Vice President after the adjournment of the National Convention, the National Chairperson of the Democratic National Committee shall confer with the Democratic leadership of the United States Congress and the Democratic Governors Association and shall report to the Democratic National Committee, which is authorized to fill the vacancy or vacancies.

_________________
 
R

Richard

TB Fanatic
energy_wave said:
You know, if it does happen to come to pass that Obama is disqualified, Hillary will fill in the ticket as presidential candidate and it will still be as good if not better.

Better get ready for the riots though. :whistle:
Click to expand...

why aren't the white women rioting becase H didn't get the nomination
 
sassy

sassy

Veteran Member
energy_wave said:
You know, if it does happen to come to pass that Obama is disqualified, Hillary will fill in the ticket as presidential candidate and it will still be as good if not better.

Better get ready for the riots though. :whistle:
Click to expand...


Hillary would be better than Obama. I could definitely live with Hillary for 4 years. Never thought I would say that but she is leaps and bounds more qualified than Obama.
 
T

Troke

Deceased
"...It almost makes you think he's been avoiding the process server..."

Really? With his every movement scheduled, announced, commented on and posted? Surely you jest.

Better idea. This was the first time the server got past the USSS. Probably figured him for some sort of wacko, of which there seem to be a plentitude these days. He probably had to be vetted first to make sure he was legit.
 
Emcomus

Emcomus

<~Knights of Malta
I doubt if he was "vetted" or considered a "wacko" sir, but do agree "the person, he or she" was checked out by the Secert Service. When being served, it is not like a bounty hunter making an arrest. Professionals from the Federal Courthouse come knocking.
 
Emcomus

Emcomus

<~Knights of Malta
sassy said:
Hillary would be better than Obama. I could definitely live with Hillary for 4 years. Never thought I would say that but she is leaps and bounds more qualified than Obama.
Click to expand...

Now Obama would look hippocritical changing horses in the middle of the stream.
 
Emcomus

Emcomus

<~Knights of Malta
Fisher said:
Fair use
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2075005/posts

Below is a Philip Berg email from a thread on Free Republic.

No, none of the proceeds will be used to support any party. The proceeds donated will strictly be used for this litigation. Legal litigation is extremely expensive, especially when you require Expert testimony, which I am anticipating.

In addition, I just received confirmation that the DNC and Senator Obama were in fact served today, 09/04/2008. The DNC was served at noon and Senator Obama was served at 1:00 p.m. All Defendants have now been served so the case can proceed.

Thank you for your email. Please keep up the great job and continue spreading the word. Together we can make a difference.

Phil Philip J. Berg, Esquire obamacrimes.com
Click to expand...


No wonder he was so upset during the O'Reily interview. Here he went in thinking he was going to upstage McCain's speech, and ends up getting served just hours before.
 
T

Troke

Deceased
"...I doubt if he was "vetted" or considered a "wacko" sir, but do agree "the person, he or she" was checked out by the Secert Service. When being served, it is not like a bounty hunter making an arrest. Professionals from the Federal Courthouse come knocking..."

Vetted=checked out. The fact that somebody waving credentials from a Fed Court will get by the USSS without 'vetting' beggars the immagination, along with the idea that Obama was 'dodging' the process server.
__________________
 
Emcomus

Emcomus

<~Knights of Malta
Oh, I agree that he wasn't "dodging" process servers. He knew the score and what was going down...this great harvard debator has 300 advisers working behind the scenes.

Ya know, its just like when Sarah was making her speech and I could hear a verbal stage cue coming across the mic (which they breifly cut off for a second when she answered; "OK"; then turned it back on)...they all have professional handlers.

He probably felt that "he, Obama, had no need to be personally served - someone else, like his lawyer could take care of that for him...but hey, when your talking about the Federal Court system, they NEED to hand those papers directly to YOU, or at YOUR feet."

Mr. Obama? Yes? (No other response is needed) served.

As far a vetting and background check, there is a difference in smatics.
 
rafter

rafter

Since 1999
So how long does he have to respond? Can they drag this out to the election, and then he figures he is home scott free?
 
P

Publius

On TB every waking moment
rafter said:
So how long does he have to respond? Can they drag this out to the election, and then he figures he is home scott free?
Click to expand...

No if that happens Burg will win by default. In fact if Obama try's to put off three times in a row! Burg can clam a no contest, and wins by default, remember this is a civil case not criminal trial.
 
MorningSunn

MorningSunn

Rhea the Rogue
Copy of the "PHILIP J. BERG v. BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA" - "COMPLAINT FOR DECLARTORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF PRELIMINARY STATEMENT" againt Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro aka Barry Obama aka Barack Dunham aka Barry Dunham


An interesting read to say the least ...

PHILIP J. BERG v. BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA


:whistle:
 
T

Troke

Deceased
Is this some sort of scheme to get Hillary on board? Or some sort of scheme to make Obama an 'illicit' POTUS so they can badger him the next four years? I find it hard to believe that the DNC has not wrung this out to the final drop. But then I have been wrong before, 1983 IIRC and it took me months to recover.

I notice a demand for a jury trial. It would be absolutely hilarious if the Jury nullified the Constiution and put Obama back in.
 
Conrad Nimikos

Conrad Nimikos

Who is Henry Bowman
If it is found that according to the law in effect when he was born he is not a citizen he cannot be legally elected president. If this is found before the election there could easily be riots. If it is found after the elections he would have to be removed as president and there will be riots.
 
almost ready

almost ready

Inactive
If it goes until he is POTUS

Troke said:
Is this some sort of scheme to get Hillary on board? Or some sort of scheme to make Obama an 'illicit' POTUS so they can badger him the next four years? I find it hard to believe that the DNC has not wrung this out to the final drop. But then I have been wrong before, 1983 IIRC and it took me months to recover.

I notice a demand for a jury trial. It would be absolutely hilarious if the Jury nullified the Constiution and put Obama back in.
Click to expand...

Joe Biden will gain the presidency.

WOn't that be something? A real black swan.
 
C

ceeblue

Inactive
Or Obama wins the election. Before he takes the oath of office, the court disqualifies him. Then the election would go to McCain.

Rioting wouldn't be as bad in the frozen North except for the larger cities. The following summer could be interesting.

We lived through the late 60s. We would make it through a time of unrest again. Remember, they tend to tear up their own neighborhoods and then whine for years about how bad the places look. This time maybe we could open up the North Slope and go bomb the Venezuelan refineries for a distraction.
 
michaelteever

michaelteever

Deceased
IMHO,

This simple serving of a civil suit is the end of his ascent to the presidency, unless of course, we circumvent our own laws.

We'll see now, won't we.

Michael
 
Emcomus

Emcomus

<~Knights of Malta
I wouldn't be too sure of this. I know that federal judges are by appointment. Still something like this will HAVE to have judical review. The driveby media probably won't cover it, unless it's appealed, which means the circuit court will have to find enough evidence to call a grand jury.
 
Last edited:
M

momof23goats

Deceased
extremely interesting to say the least. Here is anothertid bit.
If his father was already married,which he was, and his first wife, was in kenya, and had a child, then he came to the US, to go to college, and married Obama's mother, well, guess what , that marriage, is null and void. we do not have plural marriages in this country.
 
Emcomus

Emcomus

<~Knights of Malta
SpiritBear said:
So, the $64M question becomes..

What will become of this? Does the court "have to" act on it?
Click to expand...

Well, by the Federal District Court of Washington, DC "serving" Obama, his lawyer will have to file a "full disclosure" and plea (guilty or not) with in so many days. Most likely they will wait until the very last minute. Which means the court has already acted.

I think you have 90 days from the date of filing (not from the time of actually being served) to put in a plea. This will bring it right down to the wire. With extensions, it could typically drag out past the election.
 
P

Publius

On TB every waking moment
;2998295 said:
So, the $64M question becomes..

What will become of this? Does the court "have to" act on it?
Click to expand...

Burg has filed a civil suit and it raises a Constitutional Question so the court has to hear the case before the Jury and or judge can decide.
 
P

Publius

On TB every waking moment
Emcomus said:
Well, by the Federal District Court of Washington, DC "serving" Obama, his lawyer will have to file a "full disclosure" and plea (guilty or not) with in so many days. Most likely they will wait until the very last minute. Which means the court has already acted.

I think you have 90 days from the date of filing (not from the time of actually being served) to put in a plea. This will bring it right down to the wire. With extensions, it could typically drag out past the election.
Click to expand...

I don't think the court will allow it go that far in light of a Constitution Question
But if it does, who ever is the majority head of the senate will end up as our President!! If all would look at the Constitution! Article II Section 4., And also Article I Section 3. You find were it states who is to be our sitting President.:eek:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top