HEALTH Little history on the changes in diagnosing Autism.

Troke

Deceased
http://www.slate.com/id/2195766/

Children's advocacy groups are demanding that Michael Savage apologize for denigrating autism as the "illness du jour" on his radio program last Wednesday. Savage also attributed the high prevalence of autism and related disorders to faulty diagnoses: "In 99 percent of the cases, it's a brat who hasn't been told to cut the act out." How do doctors spot the disorder?

Surveillance and interviews. According to the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, autism is an early onset disorder—it appears before the age of 3—characterized by poor social and communication skills and repetitive behavior. There's no biological test to determine whether a kid has these problems, so pediatricians are encouraged to look out for warning signs—like failure to make eye contact, inability to form relationships with peers, and delayed language skills. If there's cause for a concern, a specialist will typically use a standardized questionnaire to interview the child's parents and teachers: Does little Bobby show interest in people he doesn't know? How does he show interest? Does he prefer solitary play? The specialist will also spend some one-on-one time with the child, noting how he uses toys, responds to images, and whether he engages in conversation.

Per the DSM, clinicians should diagnose a child with autism only if he is judged to have six or more social and linguistic impairments. The threshold is lower for so-called "autism spectrum disorders." A child might be described as having Asperger's if he exhibits some ritualized behavior plus at least two social-interaction impairments—e.g., he can't make friends and has trouble with nonverbal communication like eye contact—but has no significant delay in language acquisition. A child who has severe social interaction or language problems but doesn't quite meet the criteria for autism or Asperger's might end up with a diagnosis of "Pervasive Developmental Disorder Not Otherwise Specified." (For more details on how the DSM classifies these disorders, click here.)

The number of cases of autism-related disorders has skyrocketed in recent years. This past November, Hillary Clinton issued a press release claiming that the diagnosis rate had leapt from one in 10,000 in 1993 to one in 150 in 2007. That's not quite right—the rate was about four in 10,000 as far back as the 1970s and had already climbed to one in 200 in the 1980s. Either way, the numbers have gone up, leading some to wonder whether America is experiencing an epidemic. Some observers have mistakenly blamed mercury in vaccines; others, like Slate's Gregg Easterbrook, say television could be the culprit. Meanwhile, skeptics like Michael Savage hold a "cartel of doctors and drug companies" responsible for creating a panic.

What's certain is that the DSM definition has become more expansive. In the version of the manual from 1968, the word "autism" appears as a symptom of childhood schizophrenia. It only became its own category in 1980, and in 1987 the diagnosis required a finding of eight social and linguistic impairments rather than six. In 1994, the term Asperger's was introduced so doctors could diagnose a lesser form of the disorder. Awareness is also affecting the diagnosis rate: Clinicians know what to look for and are encouraged to act quickly when they notice symptoms.
 

Knoxville's Joker

Has No Life - Lives on TB
And has it occured to anyone that some of the behavioral symptoms may be a result of environmental upbringing and not something that is genetic at all? That maybe they are freaking kids and can't sit still for hours on end at school listening to a boring teacher that could care less(experienced that one myself)?

And who has made more money with the increased diagnoses rate of Autism?

http://www.slate.com/id/2195766/

Children's advocacy groups are demanding that Michael Savage apologize for denigrating autism as the "illness du jour" on his radio program last Wednesday. Savage also attributed the high prevalence of autism and related disorders to faulty diagnoses: "In 99 percent of the cases, it's a brat who hasn't been told to cut the act out." How do doctors spot the disorder?

Surveillance and interviews. According to the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, autism is an early onset disorder—it appears before the age of 3—characterized by poor social and communication skills and repetitive behavior. There's no biological test to determine whether a kid has these problems, so pediatricians are encouraged to look out for warning signs—like failure to make eye contact, inability to form relationships with peers, and delayed language skills. If there's cause for a concern, a specialist will typically use a standardized questionnaire to interview the child's parents and teachers: Does little Bobby show interest in people he doesn't know? How does he show interest? Does he prefer solitary play? The specialist will also spend some one-on-one time with the child, noting how he uses toys, responds to images, and whether he engages in conversation.

Per the DSM, clinicians should diagnose a child with autism only if he is judged to have six or more social and linguistic impairments. The threshold is lower for so-called "autism spectrum disorders." A child might be described as having Asperger's if he exhibits some ritualized behavior plus at least two social-interaction impairments—e.g., he can't make friends and has trouble with nonverbal communication like eye contact—but has no significant delay in language acquisition. A child who has severe social interaction or language problems but doesn't quite meet the criteria for autism or Asperger's might end up with a diagnosis of "Pervasive Developmental Disorder Not Otherwise Specified." (For more details on how the DSM classifies these disorders, click here.)

The number of cases of autism-related disorders has skyrocketed in recent years. This past November, Hillary Clinton issued a press release claiming that the diagnosis rate had leapt from one in 10,000 in 1993 to one in 150 in 2007. That's not quite right—the rate was about four in 10,000 as far back as the 1970s and had already climbed to one in 200 in the 1980s. Either way, the numbers have gone up, leading some to wonder whether America is experiencing an epidemic. Some observers have mistakenly blamed mercury in vaccines; others, like Slate's Gregg Easterbrook, say television could be the culprit. Meanwhile, skeptics like Michael Savage hold a "cartel of doctors and drug companies" responsible for creating a panic.

What's certain is that the DSM definition has become more expansive. In the version of the manual from 1968, the word "autism" appears as a symptom of childhood schizophrenia. It only became its own category in 1980, and in 1987 the diagnosis required a finding of eight social and linguistic impairments rather than six. In 1994, the term Asperger's was introduced so doctors could diagnose a lesser form of the disorder. Awareness is also affecting the diagnosis rate: Clinicians know what to look for and are encouraged to act quickly when they notice symptoms.
 

KerryAnn

Inactive
Autism is caused by a combination of environmental toxins and exposures, specifically mercury, aluminum and other heavy metals. Viruses, candida, and other infections are often with or a result of the heavy metal contamination and also have to be dealt with.

I know many mothers of autistic children who have improved their children's autism and even some who have gotten their children off of the autistic spectrum by doing specific treatments to remove the heavy metals from their bodies, get rid of the viruses/candida/parasites if present, and to increase the child's ability to absorb nutrition from food.
 

Garryowen

Deceased
I believe that there is impressive anecdotal evidence that the development of autism is related to the large number of immunizations being forced upon very young children.

When we were kids we expected to get measles, chicken pox, mumps, at some time of other. Usually all the siblings contracted it at about the same time, so we all got to stay home from school and listen to the radio. We got immunized for polio and smallpox and I think diptheria and whooping cough.

I don't know if it was on this board, but I read an article by a doctor who treated a great many patients who were Amish and Mennonite. They avoid immunizations generally, and this man said that out of some 30,000 patients he had only known of one or two who developed autism, and it turned out that I think one of them had gotten the shots. That doesn't constitute proof, but it certainly merits some consideration. And it is entirely possible that this increase in autism [and I do not doubt that it is real] may be due to several factors in our environment, diet, medical practice, and customs.

regards,

Garryowen
 

grommit

Senior Member
There was the study recently released and duscussed here that gave a group of chimps the Same load of vaccines that our children are "supposed" to get. While individual vaccines apparently do not give chimps any of the symptoms of autism, the complete string of vaccinations had a large number of chimps in this study acting just like autistic children. Not finding it in search.
 

USDA

Veteran Member
"dummy," "idiot," "brat," "moron," and "fool" to refer to children with autism,


Well, I got one...and those words occasionally spring to mind...as it is frustrating dealing with one's kid on the margin of this world and some other.

But my frustration doesn't do me any good...and calling names...helps even less.

Helping a 17 year old learn to tie his shoes...which he responds to by telling me he already knows how to do it...but doesn't. The only recourse is to patiently explain and demonstrate the process again and again.

But at some point; when I have given up...I catch that his shoes are tied correctly...

I can't tell you how proud that makes me feel!

Carlos Castaneda of the 'Don Juan" series of books...tells Carlos that to proceed on the path to becoming a real 'sorcerer' that the students needs a 'petty tyrant' to constantly challenge him.

Any one blessed with an autistic child has that 'petty tyrant' at his side as a life long companion. If one could just tell them..."snap out of it and stop acting this way."

Then not only would we lose our necessary 'petty tyrant' but also our boy or girl would not be 'autistic'. They would just be a 'brat'; the difference being, a brat can change, the truly autistic cannot.
 
Top