ECON McFaddens Attempts to Abolish the Federal Reserve System

USDA

Veteran Member
:rolleyes: "He tried and he died...telling the truth. Few will ever hear of him, but the Federal Reserve of Infinite Evil, lives and sucks our lives today...and Henry Paulson, former chief goblin of Goldman Sachs (or is it Sacks?) ask for even more power to do greater harm...and congress in it's idiotic thinking...will probably give it to him."

McFaddens Attempts to Abolish the Federal Reserve System

Louis T. McFadden (1876-1936): An American Hero
Source: www.marketoracle.co.uk
Published: July 22, 2008 Author: Richard C. Cook
For Education and Discussion Only. Not for Commercial Use.


Dr. Ron Paul, the Republican candidate for the 2008 presidential nomination, is not the first U.S. politician to point to the abuses of the Federal Reserve System and call for its abolishment. Similar pleas to get rid of the Fed were made by Reps. Wright Patman (1893-1976) and Henry Gonzales (1916-2000), both Democratic congressmen from Texas and chairmen of the House Banking Committee.


Few recall, however, how controversial the Fed was when it was first proposed and then maneuvered through a recessing Congress just before Christmas 1913. Rep. Charles Lindbergh, Sr., R-MN and father of the future aviator, called the Federal Reserve Act “the worst legislative crime of the ages.”

But the strongest opposition came later, during the Great Depression. The source was Rep. Louis T. McFadden, a Republican representative from Pennsylvania who, as a former bank cashier and president, knew the financial system intimately.


McFadden was born in Granville Center, Bradford County, Pennsylvania, on July 25, 1876, just three weeks after the nation celebrated its centennial at the Philadelphia Exposition. He graduated from Warner's Commercial College in Elmira, New York, and went to work at the First National Bank of Canton, PA, in 1892.

McFadden was elected to Congress in 1914 and served until 1934. Though a Republican, he moved to impeach President Herbert Hoover in 1932 and introduced a resolution to bring conspiracy charges against the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve.

He also made a 25-minute speech on the House floor accusing the Federal Reserve of deliberately causing the Depression. At the time, the chairman of the Federal Reserve Board was Eugene Meyer, who resigned after Franklin D. Roosevelt was inaugurated as president in 1933 and purchased the Washington Post at a bankruptcy auction.

Later in 1933, McFadden introduced House Resolution No. 158, Articles of Impeachment for the Secretary of the Treasury, two assistant Secretaries of the Treasury, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, and the officers and directors of its twelve regional banks. This was McFadden's political swan song. In the election of 1934, he lost his reelection bid to a Democrat by 561 votes.

Let's fast forward to 2008. We are in the early stages of an economic collapse that Nouriel Roubini, professor of economics at the NYU Stern School of Business, calls “the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression.”

Once again the Federal Reserve is implicated, this time for having enabled the creation of gigantic investment bubbles in home mortgages, commercial real estate, equity funds, hedge funds, and derivatives that are now bursting. Mayhem is now starting to be sown within the producing economy of working men and women after having wreaked devastation on Wall Street and within the banking industry despite massive Federal Reserve bailouts over the past year.

The chief culprit would appear to be Alan Greenspan, chairman of the Federal Reserve from 1987 to 2006, who presided not only over the ongoing subprime mortgage fiasco, but previously over the dot.com bubble of the 1990s. This blew up when the stock market crashed in 2000-2001, obliterating $6 trillion of investor wealth.

The subprime conflagration of the 2000s was ignited by an orgy of application fraud that commenced just after George W. Bush became president. According to former New York Governor Eliot Spitzer, the investigation of this fraud by state attorneys-general was blocked by Bush's Treasury Department.

Perhaps Louis T. McFadden was onto something. After his premature death, his words faded into history as he was derided for being anti-Semitic when he said such things as, “America has to choose between God and the money changers who have unlawfully taken our gold and lawful money into their possession.” Today he is dismissed, sneeringly, as “one of the heroes of the Federal Reserve conspiracy theorists.” (Edward Flaherty, PublicEye.org)

But maybe McFadden said some things that are still worth listening to. In his June 10, 1932, address on the House floor, he declared, as reported in the Congressional Record:

“Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks. The Federal Reserve Board, a Government board, has cheated the Government of the United States out of enough money to pay the national debt. The depredations and the iniquities of the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks acting together have cost this country enough money to pay the national debt several times over. This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of the United States, has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government. It has done this through defects of the law under which it operates, through the maladministration of that law by the Federal Reserve Board, and through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it.”

Remember, this was a former bank president and member of the Republican Party speaking! McFadden added:

“From the Atlantic to the Pacific our country has been ravaged and laid waste by the evil practices of the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks and the interests which control them ... This is an era of economic misery, and for the conditions that caused that misery, the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks are fully liable.”

Further statements by McFadden in his House speeches may be found at: http://home.hiwaay.net/~ becraft/mcfadden.html As we watch today with dismay while the U.S. dollar shrinks in value and foreign investors continue to buy huge quantities of federal government debt, we might recall McFadden's words from a 1934 speech:

“The Fed Note is essentially unsound. It is the worst currency and the most dangerous that this Country has ever known. When the proponents of the act saw that the Democratic doctrine would not permit them to let the proposed banks issue the new currency as bank notes, they should have stopped at that. They should not have foisted that kind of currency, namely, an asset currency, on the United States Government. They should not have made the Government [liable on the private] debts of individuals and corporations, and, least of all, on the private debts of foreigners.”

Of the twelve regional Federal Reserve Banks, or corporations, McFadden said in words that also prefigured the life-and-death stranglehold the Fed has over every aspect of the U.S. economy today:

“The imperial power of elasticity of the public currency is wielded exclusively by the central Corporations owned by the banks [i.e., the regional Federal Reserve Banks.] This is a life and death power over all local banks and all business. It can be used to create or destroy prosperity, to ward off or cause stringencies and panics. By making money artificially scarce, interest rates throughout the Country can be arbitrarily raised and the bank tax on all business and cost of living increased for the profit of the banks owning these regional central banks, and without the slightest benefit to the people. The twelve Corporations together cover and monopolize and use for private gain every dollar of the public currency and all public revenue of the United States. Not a dollar can be put into circulation among the people by their Government, without the consent of and on terms fixed by these twelve private money trusts.”

In language that suited the 1930s but is also prophetic of our own disjointed times, McFadden summarized his outrage by saying:

“Are you going to let these thieves get off scot free? Is there one law for the looter who drives up to the door of the United States Treasury in his limousine and another for the United States Veterans who are sleeping on the floor of a dilapidated house on the outskirts of Washington?”

McFadden may have paid with his life for his outspokenness. After he lost his congressional seat in 1934, he remained in the public eye as a vigorous opponent of the financial system; that is, until his sudden death on October 3, 1936, of a “dose” of “intestinal flue” after attending a banquet in New York City.

Reporting his death in its October 14 issue, Pelley's Weekly stated that it had “became known among his intimates that he had suffered two [previous] attacks against his life. The first attack came in the form of two revolver shots fired at him from ambush as he was alighting from a cab in front of one of the Capital hotels. Fortunately both shots missed him, the bullets burying themselves in the structure of the cab.”

Next, 'He became violently ill after partaking of food at a political banquet at Washington. His life was only saved from what was subsequently announced as a poisoning by the presence of a physician friend at the banquet, who at once procured a stomach pump and subjected the congressman to emergency treatment.'

Evidently the third time the assassins succeeded, and the most articulate critic of the Federal Reserve and the financiers' control of the nation was dead. He was 60 years old.
 

jed turtle

a brother in the Lord
as they say,

those who are ignorant of history are doomed to repeat it.

excellent history. thanks.
 

jed turtle

a brother in the Lord
I agree with this analysis but what alternative monetary system is proposed


er, i think that would be the one defined in the Constitution. something to do with the Congressional power to mint "money" defined as certain quantities of gold and silver.
 

Richard

TB Fanatic
er, i think that would be the one defined in the Constitution. something to do with the Congressional power to mint "money" defined as certain quantities of gold and silver.

the gold standard abolished under Nixon, now globally abolished, who decides on the price/value of gold, since on the free market it rises and falls, would it always be static under this system, the amount of money in circualtion would therefore depend on the amount that could be mined, what if there was a shortage of supply or oversupply or would it be regulated?
 

jed turtle

a brother in the Lord
from www.constitution.org:

Original U.S. Constitution
Art. I Sec. 8 Cl. 5
[Congress shall have Power ... ] To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, ...; Art. I Sec. 10 Cl. 1

[No State shall ...] make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; ...

Note that there is no such prohibition against Congress, or any delegated power to make anything legal tender.

Congress was originally understood to have no power to make anything legal tender outside of federal territories, under Art. I Sec. 8 Cl. 17 and Art. IV Sec. 3 Cl. 2, but in 1868 a Supreme Court packed by Pres. Ulysses S. Grant, in the Legal Tender Cases, allowed Congress to make paper currency issued by the U.S. Treasury, backed by gold, legal tender on state territory, a precedent that remains controversial to this day, when courts allow paper currency not backed by anything to be considered "legal tender".

Seventh Amendment
The only money amount in the Constitution or its amendments is in the Seventh Amendment:

In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

In 1789 the "dollar" was a coin, the Spanish taler, containing 371.25 grains of pure silver, or 416 grains of silver of standard (coin grade) purity. A troy ounce, the standard measurement unit for precious metals, is 480 grains, so a "dollar" contains 0.7734 troy ounce of pure silver, and 20 such coins would weigh 17.3333 troy ounces and contain 15.46875 troy ounces of pure silver. One can use the Oanda Currency Converter below to find out what the current value of that amount of bulk silver would be in federal reserve notes. For example, on June 15, 2000, it would be about $87.71 in federal reserve notes. However, keep in mind that the world trading price for gold or silver is the bulk, wholesale price, for ingots, in minimum quantities of 400 troy ounces, and the trading is generally only a tranfer of title and not a physical delivery of the ingots, for which an additional transport charge may be made. As single coins it would have about twice that bulk value, so the constitutional threshold under the Eighth Amendment would be closer to $176 in federal reserve notes. That would be the minimum "value in controversy" that would preserve the right to trial by jury in a civil case.

Documents
The Coinage Act of Apr 2, 1792
The Coinage Act of Mar 4, 1900
Dollar Defined — Dictionary and statutory definitions of money, 1856-1996.
Excerpt from 1923 Congressional Record — The Federal Reserve and several large banks deliberately contracted to extend credit to the agriculture industry for the purpose of eliminating many farmers.
The Gold Confiscation Of April 5, 1933 — Unconstitutional act of Congress and President Roosevelt.
Commentary
Gold and Economic Freedom, by Alan Greenspan (1966) — Before he became Chairman of the Federal Reserve he had some strong opinions, which he has never repudiated.
Pieces of Eight, by Edwin Vieira — Comprehensive treatise on money.
What Is A "Dollar"? An Historical Analysis Of The Fundamental Question In Monetary Policy, by Edwin Vieira.
Trashing the Constitution: How misconstruction of the monetary powers and disabilities subverted the Founding Fathers’ intent, speech of Edwin Vieira before the Rotary Club of New York, March 25th, 2003.
A Caveat Against Injustice, or, An Inquiry into the Evils of a Fluctuating Medium of Exchange, Roger Sherman (1752) — By the author of the Tender Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
Control of Money
Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports (CAFR) — In case you thought we live in a free enterprise economy.
Court Rules Federal Reserve is Privately Owned — Lewis v. United States, 680 F.2d 1239 (1982).
Tools
OANDA Currency Converter — Allows you to convert units of any national currency or precious metal into units of any other, for any date back to 1990.
Advocates
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee (GATA) — Advocate and undertake litigation against illegal collusion to control the price and supply of gold and related financial securities..
People for Mathematically Perfected Economy — Argues that debt-based currency leads to economic collapse.
You Be The Judge and The Jury — Accusation that the present monetary system is fundamentally corrupt and unconstitutional.
Alternatives
The following links are provided free for public educational purposes, and do not represent endorsements of the companies or their products or services.

National Organization for the Repeal of the Federal Reserve Act and the Internal Revenue Code (NORFED) — Support the Liberty Dollar backed by gold or silver.
World Gold Council — The global advocate for gold.
Crowne Gold — Gold trading.
GoldMoney — Digital gold currency.
e-gold — Gold circulated electronically.
Gold Eagle — Documents and links on gold.
Netspend — Anonymous digital cash.
PayPal — Online clearinghouse for currency exchanges among members.
 

Digital Omnivore

Veteran Member
the gold standard abolished under Nixon, now globally abolished, who decides on the price/value of gold, since on the free market it rises and falls, would it always be static under this system, the amount of money in circualtion would therefore depend on the amount that could be mined, what if there was a shortage of supply or oversupply or would it be regulated?

Right now they're regulating dollars.

There is an oversupply causing inflation.

While at the same time there is a shortage when it comes to lending.

I doubt the gold standard could do any worse.

From 1800 to 1900 the dollar actually increased in value because it was backed by gold.

Think that will happen with our dollar today?
 

Mzkitty

I give up.
It's getting later and later, but there may still be time to read The Creature From Jekyll Island.


:dvl2:
 

Hacker

Computer Hacking Pirate
the gold standard abolished under Nixon, now globally abolished, who decides on the price/value of gold, since on the free market it rises and falls, would it always be static under this system, the amount of money in circualtion would therefore depend on the amount that could be mined, what if there was a shortage of supply or oversupply or would it be regulated?

If the value of gold and silver were to be set solely by market forces, there would be no shortage (the value would rise as demand for money rises) and it would be immune to government-created inflation. More, government would be required to obtain money directly from the people, rather than borrowing it from the Fed. This would severely restrict the size of government, bringing a much greater share of freedom to us.
 

Mzkitty

I give up.
If the value of gold and silver were to be set solely by market forces, there would be no shortage (the value would rise as demand for money rises) and it would be immune to government-created inflation. More, government would be required to obtain money directly from the people, rather than borrowing it from the Fed. This would severely restrict the size of government, bringing a much greater share of freedom to us.



Well. We can't have THAT now, can we?


:rolleyes:
 

Hfcomms

EN66iq
Well, the Fed is screwing itself and us as well and were all going down together. Except that the high rollers all have their "golden parachutes" and underground bunkers to weather the storm.

You want a sure death sentence then try to abolish or even audit the Fed. The big money boys play for keeps and they are the ones with all the poker chips. Actually if we were not going to suffer so much it's almost humorous to watch the Fed continue to try to prop up the ponzi scheme they foistered.

I would love to be in congress with Chairman Bernanke with the cameras rolling and ask him a few questions. I'd ask him why a privately owned bank is running the show instead of the U.S. treasury. I'd also ask him why the "federal" reserve has stockholders and just who are the entities that own the stock. There are all sorts of delicious questions that could be asked and the rivulets of sweat would become a torrent running down his face. That and probably as well a little leakage below the belt.
 

G-Man

Inactive
it's almost humorous to watch the Fed continue to try to prop up the ponzi scheme they foistered.

It is funny, but the whole rotten mess is really starting to stink at this point. :dstrs:
 

BassMan

Veteran Member
I agree with this analysis but what alternative monetary system is proposed

Very important question...
...answer: eliminate fractional-reserve banking and private central banks! Both are pyramid schemes!

Gold is not the answer, because gold can be manipulated and still co-exist with fractional-reserve banking.

Here's a great vid on the subject (3.5 hrs...): http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-515319560256183936&q=the+money+master&ei=EFqHSO2rMIjkrQLFxfW6CA

Sadly, I don't think this will occur until the system completely collapses. Under "normal conditions", the people that control the trillions of dollars are too powerful (and ruthless).

It's not just "the Fed". As long as fractional-reserve banking is acceptable, the "beast" will be reborn. Per archeological evidence, man has not changed in about 10,000 years: only technology has. There is a reason "usury" used to be forbidden.
 

mistaken1

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Very important question...
...answer: eliminate fractional-reserve banking and private central banks! Both are pyramid schemes!

Gold is not the answer, because gold can be manipulated and still co-exist with fractional-reserve banking.

Here's a great vid on the subject (3.5 hrs...): http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-515319560256183936&q=the+money+master&ei=EFqHSO2rMIjkrQLFxfW6CA

Sadly, I don't think this will occur until the system completely collapses. Under "normal conditions", the people that control the trillions of dollars are too powerful (and ruthless).

It's not just "the Fed". As long as fractional-reserve banking is acceptable, the "beast" will be reborn. Per archeological evidence, man has not changed in about 10,000 years: only technology has. There is a reason "usury" used to be forbidden.

+1
 
Top