CRIME Man who killed cops claiming defense of his property judged demented.

Troke

Deceased
Prosecutors said Tuesday they want a 78-year-old man committed to a mental hospital after he was found incompetent to stand trial for killing two South Carolina law officers.

The decision by Solicitor Jerry Peace came a day after a circuit judge ruled that Arthur Bixby can't stand trial because he has dementia.

Instead of pursuing the original death penalty case, Peace said he will now ask a probate court judge to have Bixby committed indefinitely, something the prosecutor said he hopes will bring at least some closure to the families of the two men gunned down outside the Bixby family home nearly five years ago.

Peace says Bixby could be tried later if he were to become competent.

"Even though he stays committed and institutionalized, there's no finality about his role in this whole episode," said Peace, who said he will make the request later Tuesday. "This has been a long road for the family, and I hope I never have another case that wings its way through the system like this."

Phone numbers for the officers' families could not immediately be found to reach them for comment.

The patriarch of the Bixby family, which relocated to South Carolina from New Hampshire, would have been the final family member to stand trial in the Dec. 8, 2003, shooting deaths of sheriff's Sgt. Danny Wilson and state Constable Donnie Ouzts.

Authorities said Bixby and his son, Steven, ambushed the officers over a land dispute with Department of Transportation workers, who were starting on a road-widening project outside their home.

The shootings marked the beginning of a 14-hour standoff and shootout with more than 100 officers in Abbeville, about 85 miles west of Columbia.

Wilson went to the home to discuss the Bixbys' anger over the road project, only to be mowed down while standing on the front porch, his body dragged inside. Ouzts, who arrived later to check on Wilson, was shot as he stepped out of his patrol car and died on the way to the hospital.

The case attracted national attention in the years between the shootings and Steven Bixby's 2007 trial, with property rights advocates posting messages on Internet sites in support of the family's right to defend the 20 feet of land the state wanted for a road expansion.

In letters released during his trial, jurors heard how Bixby wrote to an ex-girlfriend from jail that he believed the shootings were justified.

"The laws were made to protect us from the police," Bixby wrote, calling the shootings "right and correct in God's eyes."

Steven Bixby, 40, was sentenced to death in February 2007 for the shootings. Several months later, his mother, 75-year-old Rita Bixby, was sentenced to life in prison for knowing what her son and husband planned but not telling authorities.

Both Steven and Rita Bixby are appealing their sentences. Larry Crane, Arthur Bixby's attorney, was in court Tuesday morning and did not immediately respond to a phone message at his office.

I personally know two local residents who state that they have the constitutional right to kill anybody who enters their property "in trespass". One further claims that a portion of the state road adjacent to his property is in trespass. I know of one occasion where some hapless citizen happened to stop on the road, the guy roared up in his ATV waving a pistol and ordered the guy to move. The citizen complained to the Sheriff who went out and told our boy that any more of that stuff and he will be put in a place where the sun don't shine and you can't hear the dogs bark either. I know of no incidents since, but then maybe nobody has ever stopped on that section of road since.
 

Jumpy Frog

Browncoat sympathizer
The Gov't didn't respect the Bixby's property, why should the Bixbys respect the Gov't' property (the LEO's sent to tresspass and enforce the theft of their property). As for the wife, it is just wrong to prosecute a wife supporting her family while not commiting a direct crime. If she pulled the trigger then so be it, but to stoop so low as to lock her up for not calling in to narc off to the very people stealing from her and her family is just stupid.
 

DrJerry

Inactive
As for the wife, it is just wrong to prosecute a wife supporting her family while not commiting a direct crime. If she pulled the trigger then so be it, but to stoop so low as to lock her up for not calling in to narc off to the very people stealing from her and her family is just stupid...
Not only stupid, unconstitutional. Or has the fifth amendment been revoked too?
 

Cardinal

Chickministrator
_______________
Tell that to the families of the dead men. At least she can appeal her sentence--they can not.


They knew what they were signing up for when they became LEOs. Possibility of being shot is what they get paid for. The woman was just living in her own home, minding her own business, and shot no one.

Your nephew robs a bank and you get thrown into jail to "warn others"...that's ok?
 

Oilpatch Hand

3-Bomb General, TB2K Army
The Article said:
The case attracted national attention in the years between the shootings and Steven Bixby's 2007 trial, with property rights advocates posting messages on Internet sites in support of the family's right to defend the 20 feet of land the state wanted for a road expansion.

I can't see where a 20' strip of land next to a public ROW is worth going to prison for killing two peace officers. If you own property adjoining a public thoroughfare, the county or state may come and ask for a bit of it to widen the road. Happens all the time. Nothing surprising about it. Most landowners will gripe about it, then they adjust to it, because they know that there's at least some chance it will happen. They almost never start shooting law enforcement officers over such a thing. Well, normal people don't, anyway.

I mean...I'm all for property rights and all that, but this Bixby group was just criminally stupid. They probably should have gone to prison just for that. :rolleyes:
 
They knew what they were signing up for when they became LEOs. Possibility of being shot is what they get paid for. The woman was just living in her own home, minding her own business, and shot no one.

Your nephew robs a bank and you get thrown into jail to "warn others"...that's ok?


She knew her husband and son were planning to kill people--any people. She did nothing. That makes her a party to the crime and she deserves to go to prision.

Read on:

http://www.independentmail.com/news/2007/oct/26/jurors-find-rita-bixby-guilty/

Rita Bixby shows no remorse in wake of verdict

Matriarch sentenced to life in prison without possibility of parole


By Charmaine Smith-Miles (Contact)

Friday, October 26, 2007


ABBEVILLE — Rita Bixby made one final statement to Judge Alexander Macaulay Friday before being sentenced to life in prison for conspiring with her son to kill two law officers in relation to a strip of land the state wanted to take for a highway project.

In the time she had to plea for the judge’s mercy, Bixby asked her attorney to say something on her behalf.

“She still feels she’s not guilty, your honor,” said her attorney, Jeffrey Bloom.

That was it. Any chance that the grieving family members of State Constable Donnie Ouzts or Abbeville County Sheriff’s Sgt. Danny Wilson had to hear a heartfelt sorry or see a look of remorse on Bixby’s face was gone.

“It’s sad that she couldn’t even stand up there and tell us that she was sorry,” said Sgt. Wilson’s cousin, Cynthia Kennedy. “She doesn’t even have a conscience.”

Rita Bixby has been jailed on charges of conspiracy and accessory to murder since Mr. Ouzts and Mr. Wilson were killed in the midst of a violent firefight outside the Bixby home on Dec. 8, 2003.

The Bixbys were angry with state transportation officials who were starting work on the widening of S.C. 72 in front the Bixbys’ Abbeville home.

Throughout her three-day trial, Bixby never looked at Mr. Ouzts’ or Mr. Wilson’s family. Like her son Steven in his trial, she carried a blank expression for most of hers. She let out a small chuckle when during closing arguments her attorney called her cantankerous.

On Friday, she showed the same blank face — until she was found guilty. When she was marched back into the courtroom for her sentencing, she wore an angry frown.

A jury of nine men and three women reached their unanimous verdict in less than two hours of deliberation. Those men and women, all from Lancaster County, have been sequestered in the small town of Abbeville since Monday. In those days, they listened to 33 witnesses.

They learned of how Mr. Wilson was shot in his side as he knocked on the Bixbys’ front door on the morning of Dec. 8, 2003. They heard testimony regarding how Mr. Ouzts was shot in the back as he responded to the house to see if he could help.

They heard a taped conversation from that day in which Bixby said she was proud of her son for defending his rights.

They listened to readings of e-mails that state agents pulled from the Bixbys’ computer after the shootings. The messages were written a month before the standoff. In them, Bixby wrote that she had warned utility workers of the impending “war” and warned them to “get out of the line of fire.”

It seems it was that taped conversation and those e-mails — words from Rita Bixby herself — were the deciding factor in the verdict.

Once in their deliberations, jurors asked a question. They wanted to hear the tape one more time and listen to the testimony about the e-mails. Ten minutes later, they reached their verdict.

That verdict was read in a silent, carefully guarded courtroom. About 20 officers stood around the room to make sure the proceedings remained civil. And despite Bixby’s last minute plea of innocence, Judge Macaulay was unmoved.

Thirty minutes after he read the jurors’ verdict, the judge served Bixby with the harshest penalty he could. He sentenced her to life without the possibility of parole — a move that then gave the Wilson and Ouzts families some sense of relief.

“I’d hate for her to get off, because she’s evil,” said Mr. Ouzts’ son, Chris. “After that lawyer gets up and talks about her age, I was afraid that the jury would go back and feel sympathy for her and not see the evilness in that woman.

“Now, she’s no longer on the easy road in the jailhouse. She’s going straight to prison.”

Steven Bixby was sentenced to death in February for shooting Mr. Wilson and Mr. Ouzts.

His 78-year-old father, Arthur, is charged with two counts of murder and is awaiting trial.

*******************

http://www.independentmail.com/news/2007/oct/23/threats-made-to-workers-at-Bixby-home-detailed-on/

Threats made to workers at Bixby home detailed on first day of trial

By Charmaine Smith-Miles (Contact)
Tuesday, October 23, 2007

Threats made at the Bixby home in December 2003 were the focus of the first day of trial Tuesday for 75-year-old Rita Bixby.

Three South Carolina Department of Transportation employees took the stand Tuesday, each testifying that in December 2003 they were met with screaming and cursing as they tried to talk with the Bixby family about the widening of S.C. 72 in front of their home on Union Church Road in Abbeville.

“It was the most chaotic scene I have ever seen,” transportation department employee Dale Williams told jurors regarding a meeting he had with the Bixbys on Dec. 4, 2003.

“There was never a calm moment. They came out on their porch and told us we were trespassing,” Mr. Williams said. “Then Rita Bixby said if anyone came on their land, there would be ‘hell to pay.’ Those were her exact words.”
Mr. Williams and two other state transportation workers said Tuesday that they felt like Ms. Bixby was leading the family in the dispute about their property.

“I offered to show them the plans detailing who owned the right of way,” said another transportation department worker, Glenn Andrew McCaffrey. “But Rita Bixby said the plans were all lies.”

The transportation department workers were among the 18 witnesses who 8th
Circuit Solicitor Jerry Peace called to the stand Tuesday. The state has 60 witnesses that they could call to build their case, Mr. Peace said. Ms. Bixby has been charged with two counts of conspiracy and accessory before the act of murder.

“This case is a little unusual. In order to prove accessory before the fact, we have to first prove that there was a murder,” Mr. Peace said.

Those charges are in connection with the deaths of State Constable Donnie Ouzts and Abbeville County Sheriff’s Sgt. Danny Wilson. Both officers were killed at the Bibxy home on Union Church Road in Abbeville on Dec. 8, 2003.
After the transportation workers took the stand Tuesday, the rest of the day’s testimony centered on what happened in the early morning hours of Dec. 8, 2003.

Officers talked about what they saw at the Bixby home when they first arrived and one local chiropractor, Dr. Craig Gagnon, told jurors about a phone call that Ms. Bixby made to him the day of the shootings.

“She told me, ‘It had begun,’ ” Dr. Gagnon said. “She said then that Steven had shot a deputy.”

If Ms. Bixby is convicted of being an accessory before the fact of murder, she could receive life in prison. However, if she is only found guilty of conspiracy then five years in prison is the maximum sentence she could receive, Mr. Peace said.

Mr. Peace said he is not sure how long it will take for the prosecution to present its case. However, Jeffrey Bloom — a Columbia attorney on the defense team — said the jury should have all the evidence by the end of the week.

“The jury probably will get the case by Friday, if not sooner,” Mr. Bloom said.
Mr. Bloom would not comment Tuesday about how many witnesses may be called in Ms. Bixby’s defense. He also would not indicate if Ms. Bixby would be taking the stand.

Today, jurors may hear evidence penned by Steven Bixby himself.

While in prison awaiting trial, Steven Bixby, Ms. Bixby's son, wrote letters to Alane Taylor, once a Bixby family friend. Portions of those letters may be admitted as evidence in the case against Ms. Bixby, Mr. Peace said.

In February, Steven, 40, was sentenced to death for shooting Sgt. Wilson and Constable Ouzts. During that two-week trial, Rita Bixby testified that she was proud of her son for standing up for himself.

“He has the right to protect his property by any means necessary,” she told jurors one day before the panel found her son guilty.

Prosecutors originally sought the death penalty against Rita Bixby, but the state Supreme Court ruled in April she could not face that punishment because she had been charged with accessory to murder, not murder itself.
Steven Bixby’s 78-year-old father, Arthur, has been charged with murder and is awaiting trial.

The Associated Press contributed to this story.
 
Top