WEATHER 'WEATHER' TO HELP OR NOT

AGENDA-DRIVEN RESPONSE - WEATHER TO HELP OR NOT​

​

​

​

​

Deanna Spingola
June 29, 2008
NewsWithViews.com



​

[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]Unfortunately, despite the government’s responsibility to protect citizen’s rights, it is blatantly obvious that the government is following an alternative, deliberately destructive agenda including: rural cleansing of the resource-producing population, economic destabilization, runaway inflation, unrestrained immigration, illegal surveillance, the NAU, deteriorating infrastructure, ethnic disparity, de-population through war, disease, toxicity, and chemtrails; selective response to “natural” disasters, destruction of the middle class, seizure of private property and obliteration of God-given liberties – all at the hands of an elite ruling class – crony monopoly capitalists and war profiteers, intent on stealing and controlling the earth’s resources, a contrived diminishing food supply and the surviving useless eaters, still obedient and moderately productive. What happened to that illusive balance of power? [/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]At the president’s discretion, along with those covert councils who supervise him, and without congressional or constitutional oversight, fifteen Executive Branch Secretaries control all federal bureaucracies which exert dictatorial power over every aspect of our lives. These agencies and their many sub-agencies facilitate U.N. programs including Agenda 21, developed during the Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) in Rio de Janeiro, June 3-14, 1992. These regulatory, metastasized Departments are: Agriculture (1889), Commerce (1903), Defense (1947), Education (1979), Energy (1977), Health and Human Services (1953), Homeland Security (November 25, 2002, absorbed FEMA in 2003 which was created by Presidential Order on April 1, 1979), Housing and Urban Development (1965), Interior (1849), Labor (1913), State (1789), Transportation (1967), Treasury (1789), and Veterans Affairs (1988), and the Attorney General (1789).[/FONT][1]​

[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]Significantly, under the Bilderberg-approved George W. Bush, cabinet-level status was granted to the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA, created December 2, 1970) and to the U.S. Trade Representative (1962).[/FONT][2][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif] In addition to power over our children through education, price of gas through manipulation of energy, etc., this allows a sitting president to bypass Congress regarding anything and everything that has to do with the environment – a veritable Pandora’s Box. With cabinet-level status for the Trade Representative, the president may sign treaties without congressional approval. A declaration of war, once required, was quietly disbanded with the current, unconstitutional king’s cabinet structure.[/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]
[/FONT]​

[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]The elevation of the EPA was first attempted in March 1990 under G. H. W. Bush. He wanted it in time to celebrate Earth Day on April 22, 1990.[/FONT][3][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif] Clinton also attempted to empower the EPA which, like FEMA and Nixon’s 1972 Regional Councils, is divided into ten regions (for better control) – see maps. The EPA declares its Agenda 21 commitment, as noted on the web site.[/FONT]​

[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]The Army makes it perfectly clear that it intends to seize private property in southeastern Colorado. They don’t “need” the land for training purposes – that is a pretext. They have sufficient mega military training bases in Iraq (along with the world’s biggest and most expensive embassy), also on plundered land. The power of eminent domain is an oft-used seizure tactic; there are others. On February 4, 2008, Not 1 More Acre!, advocates for the beleaguered citizens of southeastern Colorado, said: “The Pentagon and its military contractors are continuing to push plans to more than triple the size of the Piñon Canyon Maneuver Site in southeastern Colorado – in contravention of a law passed by Congress which forbids them to do so.”[/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]
[/FONT]​

[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]Remember, the Pentagon and the Department of Defense, since 1947, are under the jurisdiction of the king’s cabinet. Congressional leaders, frequently indebted to campaign contributors and deep-pocketed lobbyists, go through the legislative motions and pass laws they can’t or won’t enforce. Many sincere officials are out-numbered by the compliant power-loving majority, who long ago abdicated their sworn responsibilities – just like those who handed America’s financial resources to the Federal Reserve private bankers – the internationalist bankers who currently manage the president, his cabinet, elections and the monopoly media’s talking heads.[/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]
[/FONT]​

[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]Despite sounding conspiratorial, it is a fact that the U.S. has the capability of manipulating “the climate for military use.” They have applied those “modification techniques” for “more than half a century” covertly maneuvering “weather patterns, communications and electric power systems as a weapon of global warfare, enabling the U.S. to disrupt and dominate entire regions” – against “enemy countries, friendly nations” or even, dare I say, the U.S. to “destabilize economies, ecosystems and agriculture.”[/FONT][4]​

[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]According to a top-secret congressional hearing held March 20, 1974, the military used weather modification in Vietnam and by 1977 was spending $2.8 million a year on weather-modification research; the same year that the United Nations banned the “hostile use of all environmental modification techniques.” Allegedly, the U.S. discontinued all weather-modification research in 1979.[/FONT][5]​

[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]HAARP, initiated in 1992 by Advanced Power Technologies, Inc. (APTI), a subsidiary of Atlantic Richfield Corporation (ARCO) “was developed as part of an Anglo-American partnership between Raytheon Corporation “which owns the HAARP patents, and British Aerospace Systems (BAES). The HAARP project is one among several collaborative ventures in advanced weapons systems between the two defense giants. APTI (including the HAARP patents) was sold by ARCO to E-Systems Inc, in 1994.”[/FONT][6]

​

[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]“BAES was involved in the development of the advanced stage of the HAARP antenna array under a 2004 contract with the Office of Naval Research. The installation of 132 high frequency transmitters was entrusted by BAES to its U.S. subsidiary, BAE Systems Inc. and their Electronic Warfare division. In September 2007, BAE Systems Inc. received the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency’s (DARPA) top award for “outstanding leadership and engineering innovation in designing, constructing, and activating the Defense Department’s High-Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) instrument.” “HAARP, the world’s largest and most capable ionospheric research facility, will serve the U.S. scientific and defense communities for the next 30 to 50 years.” HAARP was dedicated June 27, 2007 and is “jointly funded by the U.S. Air Force, U.S. Navy, and DARPA.[/FONT][7] [8]

​

[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]The Department of Defense and the CIA, the president’s enforcement agencies, has contracts with E-Systems, founded in 1964. The CIA is “the intelligence-gathering and covert-action arm of the president.” It is not “some sort of independently run mythical loose cannon.”[/FONT][9][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif] E-Systems, owned by war-profiteer Raytheon since 1994, “manufactures and distributes electronic systems and communications networks, including electronic warfare equipment, navigation and reconnaissance machinery, and highly sophisticated spying devices.”[/FONT][10][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif] In the early 1970s, E-Systems installed communications equipment on the President’s Air Force One.[/FONT][11][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif] This created an airborne command post for the Pentagon and the White House. This “Doomsday Plane” enables the president to manage a nuclear war.[/FONT][12]​

​

[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]Although, there is no hard evidence that HAARP has or will be used for military purposes, the involvement of the Department of Defense would decidedly suggest such use. After all, they are not recognized for life and health improvement studies. Advanced technology and weaponry would provide ample opportunities to achieve their ultimate “full spectrum dominance,” including the “globalization of the world’s economy.”[/FONT][13]

​

[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) “has a mandate ‘to assess scientific, technical and socioeconomic information relevant for the understanding of climate change.’ This mandate includes environmental warfare. ‘Geo-engineering’ is acknowledged, but the underlying military applications are neither the object of policy analysis or scientific research in the thousands of pages of IPCC reports and supporting documents, based on the expertise and input of some 2,500 scientists, policymakers and environmentalists.”[/FONT][14][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif] How convenient – just ignore the horrific possibilities and implications.[/FONT]​

[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]HAARP was unable to detect the “precise location of tunnels and underground shelters which was defined as a “serious weakness in the Department of Defense plans for precision attacks on hardened targets and for counter proliferation.” Therefore, increased funding of $75 million a year was allotted, in May 1994, for further research.[/FONT][15]

​

[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]Residents of southeastern Colorado had already suffered through seven years of drought, accompanied by major financial losses due to the skyrocketing cost of hay, for which there was no assistance.[/FONT][16][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif] Benefits, financial or otherwise, are typically and repeatedly extended to well-connected corporations – rarely to independent, struggling producers.[/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]
[/FONT]​

[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]Then in December 2006, two back to back blizzards delivered record snow volume of 3 to 4 feet, with snow drifts as high as 10 to 18 feet causing financial losses of at least $500 million, economically devastating the people.[17] During the storms, between 10,000 and 15,000 cattle perished from starvation and exposure. The numbers increased as the snow melted and more carcasses were revealed. The area affected was home to “345,000 head of cattle and calves, 23,500 head of producing sows and 112,000 head of sheep and lambs.”[18] Livestock contributes 70% to Colorado's agricultural gross product.”[19][/FONT]​

[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]The record storms forced “the closures of Interstate Highways 25, 76 and 70, as well as U.S. Routes 350, 36 and 85.” Following Holiday Blizzards I and II, as they were named, more than a foot of additional snow fell on January 4-5, bringing the total snowfall for 16 days to more than 80 inches in some areas.[20][/FONT]​

[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]On January 16, 2007, newly elected Governor Bill Ritter wrote to U.S. Agriculture Secretary Mike Johanns asking for federal “financial assistance to offset livestock and agricultural losses and to help prevent additional cattle deaths.” Additionally, he sought funds to “help cover” the costs of “snow removal and emergency rescue operations.” Ritter wanted the USDA to “declare the following counties disaster areas: Baca, Bent, Cheyenne, Crowley, Huerfano, Kiowa, Las Animas, Lincoln, Otero and Prowers counties,”[21] some of the same land that the Army had targeted for seizure.[/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]
[/FONT]​

[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]The federal government offered emergency “loans” to the ranchers and farmers, people who already had burdensome bank loans.[22] The state also offered funds for “the rescue and recovery of livestock.” But, the most immediate help came from other ranchers – neighbors helping neighbors. Legislation was approved for those who suffered livestock losses based on a presidential disaster declaration. Ranchers then counted on federal help.[23][/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]
[/FONT]​

[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]Unfortunately, there were restrictions. According to their disaster declarations, “thousands of dead cattle” apparently were not “enough of a disaster” for the U.S. Department of Agriculture who “denied disaster relief and the attendant low-interest loans” to the ten Army-targeted counties devastated by the blizzards in southeast Colorado.[24] Lack of assistance might force some discouraged ranchers to sell their land. Although ranchers were not “holding their breath” for state or federal relief, such relief was desired and somewhat expected, given other disaster declarations programs instigated by FEMA and the USDA.[25][/FONT]​

[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]Governor Ritter expressed disappointment over assistance conditions that were impossible to meet. It was an additional setback to ranchers and farmers who watched their livelihoods dissolve after “prolonged drought followed by devastating storms.” Ritter, along with a state delegation appealed the USDA decision against granting low-interest loans. However, the ranchers had “sustained such terrific losses that more bank loans” would not have kept “them from going under.”[26][/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]
[/FONT]​

[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]The Emergency Farm Relief Act of 2007, in the works for several years, would have provided payments to ranchers for livestock losses due to floods, wildfires, hurricanes and blizzards. However, USDA denial was based on its assessment that the counties had not suffered 30 percent production losses - not economic losses.”[27] “One factor leading to the limited assistance was that livestock do not fall under USDA crop disaster designations, since livestock are not a crop.”[28][/FONT]​

[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]Additionally, freezing rain during those December 2006 storms resulted in “significant ice accumulation” causing “tens of thousands of people” in the five affected states to lose electrical power, “paralyzing much of the Great Plains. Ice accumulation also downed trees and communication towers.”[29][/FONT]​

[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]“The worst victims of the December storms, particularly in Colorado’s High Plains, were cattle; thousands were trapped by heavy snow and strong winds, which created drifts up to 20 feet in some areas. Strong north winds caused unbelievable blizzard conditions, with drifts as tall as two-story buildings.”[30][/FONT]​

[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]That blizzard may affect cattle reproduction for years to come. Bulls experienced reproductive problems “due to frozen testicles.” Cows whose embryos died in early pregnancy due to the cold were vulnerable to deadly infections. Large numbers of “stillborn or aborted calves” resulted in a decreased “number of replacement females. Such reproductive problems resulting from the blizzard may have an economic impact for the next three to five years.”[31][/FONT]​

​

[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]Some hay deliveries arrived weeks later, too late for the deceased cows. “Some ranchers felt the distribution could have been timelier in execution. Ranchers and farmers have not received federal disaster relief and emergency aid, such as money for livestock rescue and recovery.”[32] Too little, too late – just like New Orleans and currently, Iowa. FEMA immediately responded on 9/11. Debris, which may have provided evidence, was hurriedly cleared away, an anomaly in such circumstances. The EPA, also very quickly, declared that the toxic air was harmless. People, trusting authority, accepted the falsehood. Many individuals developed serious health problems and have since died.[/FONT]​

​

[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]Colorado applicants for assistance had to leap through numerous hoops despite very public, appeasing, sympathetic rhetoric and philanthropic performances associated with the Presidential Snow Emergency Declarations. One may view the After Action Report. Yes, folks, we can trust the government – NOT!

HAARP: Part 1
HAARP: Part 2
Who's Controlling the Weather?
HAARP - Nature Modification Weapon
Chemtrails and Fort Carson Just why/how did healthy, 51-year old Brig. Gen. Bruce Barlow (scroll down) die? He was stationed at Fort Carson.[/FONT]​

[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]Footnotes:[/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]1, President Bush's Cabinet
[/FONT][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]2, Ibid
[/FONT][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]3, New York Times, House Panel Votes to Elevate The E.P.A. to Cabinet Status, March 14, 1990
[/FONT][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]4, Weather warfare, Beware the US military’s experiments with climatic warfare, by Michel Chossudovsky, December 7, 2007
[/FONT][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]5, Don't like the weather? Change it by Drake Bennett, July 3, 2005
[/FONT][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]6, Ibid
[/FONT][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]7, Ibid
[/FONT][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]8, USA. BAE Systems space weather research facility wins top award
[/FONT][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]9, The Mafia, CIA & George Bush, the Untold Story of America’s Greatest Financial Debacle by Pete Brewton, 1992, Introduction
[/FONT][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]10, The Princeton Review, Internship: E-SYSTEMS
[/FONT][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]11, Brazil: Amazon Contractor Raytheon has CIA Ties by Pratap Chatterjee, Inter Press Service, December 3, 1995
[/FONT][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]12, Weather warfare, Beware the US military’s experiments with climatic warfare, by Michel Chossudovsky, December 7, 2007
[/FONT][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]13, Weather warfare, Beware the US military’s experiments with climatic warfare, by Michel Chossudovsky, December 7, 2007
[/FONT][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]14, Ibid
[/FONT][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]15, HAARP: Detection and Imaging of Underground Structures Using ELF/VLF Radio Waves
[/FONT][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]16, State, ranchers fear record loss of cattle, Toll from snowstorms expected to rattle beef industry in Colorado by
Deborah Frazier and David Montero, Rocky Mountain News, January 3, 2007
[/FONT][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]17, Colorado's ranchers face 7-figure losses because of last month's Snowfall
[/FONT][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]18, Gov. Ritter Seeks Federal Aid For Livestock Losses, January 16, 2007
[/FONT][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]19, USDA Approves Blizzard-Relief Loans To Ranchers In 10 Southeast Colorado Counties, January 26, 2007
[/FONT][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]20, December 20-21, 2006 Colorado Blizzard
[/FONT][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]21, Gov. Ritter Seeks Federal Aid For Livestock Losses, January 16, 2007
[/FONT][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]22, USDA Approves Blizzard-Relief Loans To Ranchers In 10 Southeast Colorado Counties, January 26, 2007
[/FONT][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]23, Colorado's ranchers face 7-figure losses because of last month's Snowfall by Amy Gillentine, Jan 12, 2007
[/FONT][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]24, Editorial, Ranchers deserve federal aid, February 13, 2007
[/FONT][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]25, Emergency Responses for High Plains Cattle Affected by the December 28-31, 2006, Blizzard by Bimal Kanti Paul, Deborah Che, and Vicki L. Tinnon, Department of Geography, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas
Quick Response Research Report 191. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado Natural Hazards Center
[/FONT][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]26, Editorial, Ranchers deserve federal aid, February 13, 2007
[/FONT][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]27, Ibid
[/FONT][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]28, Emergency Responses for High Plains Cattle Affected by the December 28-31, 2006, Blizzard by Bimal Kanti Paul, Deborah Che, and Vicki L. Tinnon, Department of Geography, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas
Quick Response Research Report 191. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado Natural Hazards Center
[/FONT][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]29, Ibid
[/FONT][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]30, Ibid
[/FONT][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]31, Ibid
[/FONT][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]32, [FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]Ibid[/FONT] [/FONT]
© 2008 Deanna Spingola - All Rights Reserved​

http://educate-yourself.org/lte/australiandroughtandfarmloss23jun08.shtml
June 23, 2008
[SIZE=+1]Australia: Canberra Resident Links Engineered Droughts to Wipe Out of Private Farming (June 23, 2008)[/SIZE]
----- Original Message -----
From: Mandy
To: Editor
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008
Subject: Drought in Australia: a satanical hoax.
Good morning Ken,​

Your suspicions about the long-term droughts in Australia are correct (http://educate-yourself.org/lte/somethinghappeninginsky29may08.shtml)​

I have observed and witnessed some very unusual and intense activities in the Australian sky for the last 5 years and I will try to explain as clearly as possible the results of my research and observations. The drought Australians are experiencing is not local or regional but definitely national. It covers the whole continent. It is a huge full-scale secret operation which involves hundreds of airplanes; a criminal act of the highest order. It is a multi-billion dollar operation and it is absolutely mind boggling the number of planes they operate to manipulate the weather and the high price of petrol/diesel or kerosene is certainly not an issue for them (who pays and who benefits?). We are being fumigated deliberately like mere rabbits in a hole to create the illusion of a permanent drought affecting Australia in the name of ‘national security’.​

The 5-year+ long drought is being manipulated and controlled by the government, the military (so, what’s new?) and the multinationals and started roughly after the visit of George Bush in October 2003.​

Around February/March 2004 I fell upon your site by accident and it is at the same time (April 2004) that Chemtrails started to appear above Canberra (and which haven’t stopped since). However I am aware that chemtrails had been identified as early as 2000 in other Australian states.​

Following the instructions of Don Croft I managed to collect the necessary material to build a chembuster which was launched in October 2004 attracting a beautiful array of giant sylphs. I have also created dozens of tbs of different sizes and busted dozens of microwave towers as they started sprouting like mushrooms during the same year.​

Here is a picture of a plane from Nasa website which is the exact replica of what can be seen in the Australian sky at any time of the day all year around: (http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070605.html).​

They are all silvery in colour with a red tail and of different sizes. This plane in the picture is not a commercial airplane and this is not a contrail. This trail is far too long to be an ordinary contrail. A contrail is no longer than 5 or 6 times the length of the entire plane and will disappear almost instantly or within 10 seconds. The trail on that picture is roughly 30 times the length of the plane and much thicker in substance to be just sheer condensation.​

The substance that comes out of this plane (and the ones I witness constantly) is definitely of a chemical nature and its flow can be turned on and off at will. The length of the trail can be regulated to make it shorter or longer; its density thicker or thinner to give the appearance of a commercial plane with a contrail. In other words, any chemical trail will expand and become a chemtrail and vice versa. It is also obvious that sometimes their tank(s) run out of chemicals and suddenly they swap tanks. A slight dent in the continuity of the even spray reveals an empty tank. Often in the evening the thick spray thins out suddenly and the tiny plane disappears, going back to its base with empty tanks.​

The density and thickness of the trail will vary with the density and texture of the clouds they want to target. When the chemicals slowly fall and hit the clouds, these clouds start dissolving, disintegrating slowly just to become mere puffs of smoke. The residue left behind will give a hazy look in the air, the landscape is no longer sharp and clear, it is as if we are caught in a bushfire. Then DOR settles in. The wind drops, the trees become still, not a leaf moves, the town becomes a ghost town with no life and where everything stands still. The wind has been “tamed”. Then for days on end not a breath of wind will be felt.​

Although all clouds will disappear, they will keep spraying tons and tons of chemicals all day long to prevent any new formation of clouds. Then to maintain a permanent cloudless sky and to sustain a permanent state of belief that we are in a drought-like environment, airplanes will keep on spraying a thin line of spray, almost imperceptible but still visible to the keen eye. They will spray as long as some clouds remain.​

Every single evening, without exception, they make sure that the sky becomes cloudless but they will keep on spraying relentlessly until 10:00 pm to prevent any formation of moisture during the night. Their blinking lights and their regular constant flights cannot be mistaken, mainly when they fly close to a full moon and their chemicals shine on a black background. Needless to say these chemicals can also affect and modify the atmospheric pressure.​

Very often Sylphs come to the rescue and transmute the chemtrails into little puffy clouds or clean the sky from their long day spraying. Not long ago the sky was clear of any cloud with only one Sylph left cleaning up the soup. They managed to bring in a plane and spray over the Sylph. A huge amount of Sylphs in the morning is a clear indication that the spray is going to be intense.​

As a result of continuous spray the chemicals absorb the humidity and the moisture in the air, removing the barrier, which protects us from the ultra violet. Consequently the chemicals raise the temperature a few degrees but also create the intense heat (almost unbearable) of the sun, even in winter due to the lack of humidity in the air. Right now it is winter in Canberra and we are experiencing a very mild winter compared to what we used to have in the past. It has nothing to do with the bogus climate change but with the innumerable planes and their constant spewing. One just has to look up and observe the strange things happening there.​

Generally the spray will start at 6:30 am (or at least this is the time they can be spotted over Canberra) until 10:00 pm everyday. It is not unusual to see 6 or 8 airplanes spewing at any one time in the sky from horizon to horizon, either flying parallel at different altitudes or following each other in a ‘comb’ formation. They spray along the coast to block any clouds coming from the open sea and prevent the clouds from penetrating further inland. Needless to say that when they spray, they spray both directions, continuously crossing each other. When they tend to follow each other, an interval of 10 or 15 minutes separate them. Some planes contravene any rules and regulations by flying outside of their prescribed flight corridors when large clouds are coming. These planes cannot be commercial planes. Australia has a population of 21 million and therefore does not justify or support the huge quantity of airplanes involved.​

When a large front is about to reach Australia, the chemtrails start appearing en masse, generally before a full or new moon when the pull of the moon’s energy is felt more strongly. This website gives us a good indication of what type of weather to expect (although it provides the weather pattern of 12 hours ago, it gives a rough idea): (http://www.bom.gov.au/products/IDE00902.loop.shtml), any prospect of heavy rain is quickly aborted to the great surprise of the weatherman.​

A couple of years ago I travelled around Australia and witnessed the same type of spraying happening in Victoria (state), Northern Territory or all along the coast of Queensland. It does not matter where I was located, I continuously witnessed the large bands of chemtrails, the same long trails coming out of these planes, the same breaking down of the clouds and the same intense heat, and the drought ravaging the landscape. (What a great opportunity to bust microwave towers along the way!!)​

It was at that time that I read an article (was it from ZS Livingstone?) which said that there were 5 large continents in the upper levels of the stratosphere that HAARP could easily manipulate and direct towards any destination where they could create a hurricane on demand. What about the clouds, the moisture, the humidity or the water they are “hijacking” from the Australian sky and robbing the Australian people of. Where does it go? Is it also “hijacked” and transported to drown Burma? Or floods Indonesia with torrential rains creating deadly landslides? Just a thought.​

Not surprisingly CSIRO (The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation), which is the scientific ‘guru’ of Australia, keep very quiet about this phenomenon. No mention of chemtrails in the media or on TV. Nobody seems to even see or notice them. The so-called ‘academic world’ does not mention a thing about it. How many Australian politicians are implicated in this diabolic plan and receive generous salaries, bonuses or perks to keep their mouths shut. Strangely enough 2 state premiers resigned last year, feeling the urge to be suddenly close to their families and to decide it was time to see their children grow. Are some politicians still endowed with consciousness and refuse to be part of this monstrous agenda?​

From the literature spreading rapidly around, thanks to the Internet or Youtube, we learn that the chemtrails phenomenon consists of 3 main reasons: 1) weather modification; 2) to save us from global warming; 3) to save us from terrorism (not to mention others connected to ELF and microwave towers or to suppress our spiritual expansion). The 3rd reason would be the excuse for this intensive spraying or at least offered to the politicians and the air traffic control people to allow those planes to ‘patrol’ the sky by the hundreds against terrorism and at the same time spraying continuously to create this make believe drought (who are the real terrorists?).​

A few years ago the Australian government started to give retirement packages to some senior CSIRO scientists, mainly to those who were opposed to new techniques concerning the domain of agriculture. The more conservative scientists resisted any change while the government was pushing for a new approach such as bio-engineered crops or at least to promote the use of genetically modified seeds provided by Monsanto thanks to the ‘free trade agreement’.​

Dan Price, a food expert on the White House’s National Security Council mentioned not so long ago that “a number of bio-engineered crops have shown themselves to increase yields through their drought resistance and pest resistance”. It is interesting to note that as David Icke so often mentions in his books (problem/reaction/solution) they are providing the world, and in this instance Australia, with a solution that has been carefully planned, prepared and engineered in Monsanto’s laboratories a long long time ago for a problem, which is crippling the world now?​

Who is bankrupting the Australian farming industry? Who is forcing the Australian farmers off their land, who is forcing them to sell their farms and their land at a ridiculous price and who is going to buy their farms and their land at a ridiculous price due to this endless drought? Who is pushing the Australian farmers to desperation and to force them to buy and use GM seeds? And who is unabatedly spraying chemicals into the Australian sky to create this permanent state of drought? Up until now, from what I have heard, only one state is resisting the use of GM seeds. And while there is no water, there is no crop, and with no crop there is no food and no food means a food crisis. Whose interest is it to persistently destroy Australian agriculture, Australian industry and at the same time the entire Australian economy?​

A ‘free market’ in grain will certainly destroy the Australian economy while the severe drought will undermine ‘food security’ and create a ‘food crisis’. This food crisis will accelerate global famine to achieve the long cherished plan of the New World Order.​

Thank you for your time Ken, and thank you for your great website. You reach a lot of people like a lighthouse shedding light on fishing boats coming back to port at night.​

http://educate-yourself.org/ct/

.
​