Is Time On Israel’s Side?

Wowser

Inactive
VDARE.COM - http://www.vdare.com/buchanan/080515_israel.htm

May 15, 2008
Is Time On Israel’s Side?

By Patrick J. Buchanan

As Israel enters its 61st year, Israelis may look back with pride. Yet, the realists among them must also look forward with foreboding.

Israel is a modern democracy with the highest standard of living in the Middle East. In the high-tech industries of the future, she is in the first rank. From a nation of fewer than a million in 1948, Israel's population has grown to 7 million. In seven wars—the 1948 War of Independence, the Sinai invasion of 1956, the Six-Day War of 1967, the Yom Kippur War of 1973, and the Lebanon wars of 1982 and 2006—Israel has prevailed, though some of these wars were, as Wellington said of Waterloo, "a damn near-run thing."

Israel has revived Hebrew, created a new currency, immersed her children in the history, ancient and modern, of her people, and established a homeland for Jews from all over the world, millions of whom have migrated there to settle. Israel is now home to the largest concentration of Jews anywhere on earth.

Here, however, we come to the heart of the existential crisis.

Israel became home to the largest Jewish population on earth in part because American Jews in the 1990s fell in number from 5.5 million to 5.2 million, a loss of 300,000, or 6 percent of the U.S. Jewish population.

According to Charles Krauthammer, by 2050, the U.S. Jewish population will have shrunk another 50 percent to 2.5 million. American Jews are slowly vanishing. How and why is this happening?

It is the collective decision of American Jews themselves, who have led the battles for birth control and a woman's right to choose.

As Jews were roughly 2 percent of the U.S. population from Roe v. Wade to today, perhaps 2 percent of the 50 million legal abortions since Roe were likely performed on Jewish girls or women, resulting in 1 million lost members of the Jewish community in 35 years.

And if demography is destiny, Israel's future, too, appears grim.

As former Ambassador Zalman Shoval writes, Israel's population of 7 million is 80 percent Jewish. [Israel celebrates 60 years, Washington Times, May 8, 2008]But the Palestinian population of Israel has risen to 20 percent and is growing much faster.

One Israel blogger, using Shoval's totals, writes that among the Israeli population between 1 and 4 years old, roughly 30 percent is Arab. The future of Israel is thus increasingly Arab and less Jewish.

According to the United Nations, by 2050, Israel will have 10 million people.

By then, the Arab population, at present birth rates, is likely to be close to 30 percent of the Israeli population. On the West Bank and Gaza, today's 4 million Arabs are to explode to 10 million, far outstripping the growth in Israel. Jordan's population of 5 million, 60 percent Palestinian, will also double to 10 million.

Thus, not even counting Palestinians in Lebanon, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Syria and the Gulf states, Israel's 7 million to 8 million Jews in 2050 will be living with 13 million Palestinians in Israel, Jerusalem, Gaza and the West Bank. If Israel is to survive as a Jewish state, a separate and independent Palestinian state would seem an imperative.

Yet, as Israelis continue to build outposts and expand and add settlements, the possibility of a Palestinian state recedes. Indeed, many Israelis, seeing what an end to the occupation produced in Gaza, refuse to consider any pullout at all from the West Bank.

Such a policy of holding on and digging in is sometimes the best one—but only if time is on one's side. Is time on Israel's side?

According to the world population statistics from the National Policy Institute, the worldwide Arabic population in 1950 was only 94 million, less than 4 percent of the world population. But by 2050, it will be 700 million, 7 percent of a world population of almost 10 billion.

According to U.N. population experts, Lebanon's population will grow to 5 million in 2050, but Syria's will almost double from today's 20 million to 34 million. The population of Saudi Arabia will rise from 24 million to 45 million. Egypt will grow by more than 50 million to 121 million Egyptians by 2050. The Islamic Republic of Iran, 71 million today, is expected to reach 100 million at mid-century.

And, demography aside, the Islamic faith of Israel's neighbors is becoming militant. Hamas now controls Gaza. Hezbollah now controls Southern Lebanon and is becoming the power in Beirut. While Egypt is headed by a pro-American autocrat, the principal rival for power is the widely popular Muslim Brotherhood.

Those who do not like the Saudi monarchy should consider what is likely to rise in its place, should the House of Saud fall.

The same is true of the Jordanian and Moroccan monarchies, and the sheikdoms, emirates and sultanates of the Persian Gulf.

In any struggle of generations, the critical question is often: Whose side is time on? As President Bush celebrates Israel's 60th birthday, and is celebrated in turn as Israel's best friend ever, it is a fair question to ask.

Patrick J. Buchanan needs no introduction to VDARE.COM readers; his book State of Emergency: The Third World Invasion and Conquest of America, can be ordered from Amazon.com. His new book is Day of Reckoning: How Hubris, Ideology, and Greed Are Tearing America Apart.

The articles on VDARE.com are brought to you by the VDARE Foundation. We are supported by generous donations from our readers. Contributions are tax deductible and appreciated. Contribute...

[ Home ] [ Up ] [ Why VDARE.com / The White Doe? ] [ FAQ ] [ Blog ] [ e-Bulletins ] [ Contact Us ] [ VDARE.com People Pages ] [ Links ] [ Search ] [ Blog Search ] [ Archive ] [ Letters ] [ The VDARE Foundation ] [ Make A Tax-Deductible Contribution ]

RSS 2.0 Feed...

Copyright © 1999 - 2008 VDARE.com
 

Wowser

Inactive
VDARE.COM - http://www.vdare.com/roberts/080515_lies.htm

May 15, 2008
Constitution’s Checks, Balances Failing As Bush Prepares Iran Attack

By Paul Craig Roberts

On May 15, the White House Moron, in a war-planning visit to Israel, justified the naked aggression he and Olmert are planning against Iran as the only alternative to “the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history.”

But the White House Moron has the roles reversed. It is not Iran that is threatening war. It is Bush. It is not Bush who is appeasing. It is Iran.

Iran has not responded in kind to any of Bush’s warlike moves and provocations. Iran has not sunk a single one of our sitting-duck ships and has not given the Iraqi insurgents any weapons that would easily turn the tide of war against the US.

It is Bush, not Iran, who sounds like Adolf Hitler blustering and threatening. It is Bush’s American Brownshirts, the neocons, who express the view: “what’s the good of nuclear weapons if you can’t use them.”

It is the US that is funding assassination teams inside Iran and using taxpayer dollars to fund dissident and violent organizations opposed to the Iranian government. Iran is doing no such thing here.

It is members of the Bush Regime and US generals who continue to lie through their teeth about Iranian support for insurgents, for which they can supply no evidence, and about Iranian nuclear weapons programs, for which the IAEA inspectors can find no sign.

It is the US print and TV media that serves the Bush Regime as propaganda ministry for its lies of aggression.

All the war crimes that are being planned are being planned by Bush and Olmert.

What would George Orwell make of the Bush Regime’s position that anything less than a direct act of naked aggression is appeasement?

The Chicago City Council has passed a resolution “opposing any US attack on Iran and urging the Bush Administration to pursue diplomatic engagement with that nation.” But the White House Moron says diplomacy is appeasement. He learned this false equivalence from the neocon Brownshirts whose control over his administration has made America despised throughout the world, with the exception of Israel.

After broadcasting false claims for weeks from US generals and Bush Regime spokespersons that the US has “definite proof” in the form of captured Iranian weapons that Iranians were “responsible for killing American troops”, the great free American media went silent when LA Times correspondent Tina Susman reported from Baghdad: “A plan to show some alleged Iranian-supplied explosives to journalists last week in Karbala and then destroy them was canceled after the United States realized none of them was from Iran.”

A people devoid of a media are sitting ducks for tyrannical government, which is what the US has.

What is the difference between Hitler’s concocted excuses for his acts of naked aggression and the Bush Regime’s plan to use a briefing by General Petraeus, with “captured Iranian weapons” as props, as proof of Iranian complicity in US deaths in Iraq as a means to break down public and congressional resistance to an attack on Iran?

Why has the Bush Regime suffered no consequences for this blatant attempt to orchestrate an excuse for another war?

Why have there been no consequences to the Regime for the blatant lies it told in order to attack Iraq?

Why has the Bush Regime suffered no consequences for its violation of US statutory laws against spying without warrants and against torture?

In the US criminal justice system, three strikes and you are out.

For the Bush Regime is there any limit on its lawless behavior?

How many strikes? A dozen? Thirty? Three hundred?

Is there a limit?

Paul Craig Roberts [email him] was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury during President Reagan’s first term. He was Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal. He has held numerous academic appointments, including the William E. Simon Chair, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Georgetown University, and Senior Research Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University. He was awarded the Legion of Honor by French President Francois Mitterrand. He is the author of Supply-Side Revolution : An Insider's Account of Policymaking in Washington; Alienation and the Soviet Economy and Meltdown: Inside the Soviet Economy, and is the co-author with Lawrence M. Stratton of The Tyranny of Good Intentions : How Prosecutors and Bureaucrats Are Trampling the Constitution in the Name of Justice. Click here for Peter Brimelow’s Forbes Magazine interview with Roberts about the recent epidemic of prosecutorial misconduct.

The articles on VDARE.com are brought to you by the VDARE Foundation. We are supported by generous donations from our readers. Contributions are tax deductible and appreciated. Contribute...

[ Home ] [ Up ] [ Why VDARE.com / The White Doe? ] [ FAQ ] [ Blog ] [ e-Bulletins ] [ Contact Us ] [ VDARE.com People Pages ] [ Links ] [ Search ] [ Blog Search ] [ Archive ] [ Letters ] [ The VDARE Foundation ] [ Make A Tax-Deductible Contribution ]

RSS 2.0 Feed...

Copyright © 1999 - 2008 VDARE.com
 

momof23goats

Deceased
Israel, is going t ohave to make a move soon.
hezzbuklla, is being funded by Iran, and given fighters by iran, same with weapons. these are beingsmuggled into the west bank, andthey are all using them. so Israel is going to have to move, and make it soon , rather than later.
 

Walker10

Veteran Member
God is on Israel's side, even if time might not be.
Anyone who has not accepted Jesus as Lord and Savior is a sure bet to not have God on their side. Anyone who has rejected God's most precious gift, doesn't have God on their side.

A couple of other things that Pat Buchanan didn't mention is the financial state of the US. If our financial problems continue to grow and we go into a deep recession if not a flat out depression, the US may find itself in the position where it will have to cut back on it's foreign aid. If that happens and if our foreign aid to Israel dries up, Israel has had it. It cannot sustain itself without our financial and mililtary aid and there are no other countries that will come to Israels aid and keep it propped up.

A couple of weeks ago (I don't have a link), I came across an article that contained a poll that showed Jews in general and young Jews in particular are identifying with Israel less and less as time is going on. This is another thing that doesn't bode well for Israel.
 

Fred's Horseradish

Membership Revoked
Anyone who has not accepted Jesus as Lord and Savior is a sure bet to not have God on their side. Anyone who has rejected God's most precious gift, doesn't have God on their side.

A couple of other things that Pat Buchanan didn't mention is the financial state of the US. If our financial problems continue to grow and we go into a deep recession if not a flat out depression, the US may find itself in the position where it will have to cut back on it's foreign aid. If that happens and if our foreign aid to Israel dries up, Israel has had it. It cannot sustain itself without our financial and mililtary aid and there are no other countries that will come to Israels aid and keep it propped up.

A couple of weeks ago (I don't have a link), I came across an article that contained a poll that showed Jews in general and young Jews in particular are identifying with Israel less and less as time is going on. This is another thing that doesn't bode well for Israel.

Absolutely correct.
 

Desperado

Membership Revoked
Anyone who has not accepted Jesus as Lord and Savior is a sure bet to not have God on their side. Anyone who has rejected God's most precious gift, doesn't have God on their side
A couple of other things that Pat Buchanan didn't mention is the financial state of the US. If our financial problems continue to grow and we go into a deep recession if not a flat out depression, the US may find itself in the position where it will have to cut back on it's foreign aid. If that happens and if our foreign aid to Israel dries up, Israel has had it. It cannot sustain itself without our financial and mililtary aid and there are no other countries that will come to Israels aid and keep it propped up.
A couple of weeks ago (I don't have a link), I came across an article that contained a poll that showed Jews in general and young Jews in particular are identifying with Israel less and less as time is going on. This is another thing that doesn't bode well for Israel.

Doesn't anyone else see the Hypocrisy of this statement?
Take the first paragraph then look at the last paragraph.....
You tell me you must accept Christ to be saved then in the same breath you are surprized that things don't look good for Israel.
As far as financial aid to Israel, I think it is far more important to take care of the people here in the US as opposed to Israel. After 60 years of US welfare, there is no excuse for them not to be able to survive on their own.
 

Walker10

Veteran Member
Doesn't anyone else see the Hypocrisy of this statement?
Take the first paragraph then look at the last paragraph.....
You tell me you must accept Christ to be saved then in the same breath you are surprized that things don't look good for Israel.
What hypocrisy? Jews at least the majority of them do not believe Jesus Christ is the Savior. I think you misunderstood what I was saying.
As far as financial aid to Israel, I think it is far more important to take care of the people here in the US as opposed to Israel. After 60 years of US welfare, there is no excuse for them not to be able to survive on their own.
Yup, exactly, we should be looking out for our own people first. The US is not in the business of being enslaved to ANY other country ensuring their financial or political viability.
 

Troke

Deceased
The assumption is that this Israel is the one that God is interested in. What makes you think that?

I think this Israel is doomed unless Hamas or somebody like that does something real stupid. In that case, Israel will solve the problem for the next three generations or so.
 
Top