Kenya's descent into chaos shunned by American media

Martin

Deceased
Kenya's descent into chaos shunned by American media


Once a candle of hope in Africa, Kenya has quickly fallen apart since rigged elections in December
By James Baird

published: February 03 2008 11:34 AM updated:: February 03 2008 02:58 PM
Ethnic clashes in Kenya were set off when a presidential election was widely rumored to be rigged by Mwai Kibaki, taking the presidency from his heavily favored opponent, Raila Odinga.

After Kibaki won the Dec. 30 elections by nearly 250,000 votes, Odinga called for immediate re-elections to be held and for Kibaki to step down.

When Kibaki refused the proposal, riots and attempted ethnic cleansing ensued in the streets of Nairobi and throughout the streets of the once peaceful country.

"Everyone said this isn't tribal, this isn't Hutus and Tutsis, this is prosperous harmonious Kenya," said Trevor Royle of the Sunday Herald. "Now that Kikuyu gangs are on the rampage the certainties have disappeared and there is a fear that the mayhem could spiral out of control."

Even with a peace deal announced Friday by former U.N. secretary-general Kofi Annan and agreed upon by Kibaki and Odinga, fighting has not yet ceased.

With at least 13 fatalities since the announcement of the deal and in excess of 70 since Friday, U.S. State Department Assistant for African affairs, Jendayi Frazer, has officially labeled the conflicts taking place in Kenya to be ethnic cleansing.

Overall the death toll is nearing 1,000 with no end to the fighting currently in sight.

Let us not kid ourselves and think that this is an electoral problem. It's much broader and much deeper. Kofi Annan, former UN Secretary General
Meanwhile, more than a quarter of a million people have been forced from their homes by the fighting, shattering the nation's image of stability and damaging one of the continent's most promising economies.

"Let us not kid ourselves and think that this is an electoral problem. It's much broader and much deeper," Mr Annan said after visiting parts of the Rift Valley on Saturday.

A survey by a Kenyan newspaper showed that more than 70 percent of respondents called for the lifting of a ban on live broadcasts that has been in effect since the disputed election results.

The poll of 2,158 Kenyan citizens showed that 70.9 percent called to lift the ban and 29.1 percent were in favor of maintaining the ban in fear that live broadcasting by politicians could set off more attacks.

As Cyril Vanier of France24 asked, why won't the United Nations, African Union or other western organizations that once pushed democracy intervene?

The answer to that question is not simple but undoubtedly caused in part by the lack of media pressure on the mentioned government organizations.

Apparently, most major American media outlets consider the death of hundreds and the destabilization of one of Africa's most industrialized and affluent nations less important than ratings, revenue and the coverage pop-culture news.

There is nothing wrong with mentioning celebrity news and giving information about popular events. However, respectable media companies should not be the main providers of such information.

The Kenyan's are just the latest to suffer the results of news companies chasing ratings and leaving true news on the backburners, instead of doing the right thing.


http://tnjn.com/2008/feb/03/kenyas-descent-into-chaos-shun/
 

Mzkitty

I give up.
Martin -- what can we DO even if everybody knew (or cared).

Africa is and always has been completely insane.

:dvl2:
 

Grantbo

Inactive
I hope the dirty liberals in the US don't hear about this. They'll be tempted to throw our tax money at it. More $ down the 3rd world tube. :shk:

For you dirty liberals who don't like my comments: You'll probably wonder what is my solution? My solution is to let them handle their own problems.
 

Amaryllis

Inactive
Isn't Mwai Kibaki connected somehow with Barak Obama? If so, that would certainly explain the lack of coverage by US media. Our media have made it abundantly clear that their top pick for president is Obama. They wouldn't want to bring negative attention to him by mentioning the destabalizing of a nation by a man he has connections to.
 

Mzkitty

I give up.
Isn't Mwai Kibaki connected somehow with Barak Obama? If so, that would certainly explain the lack of coverage by US media. Our media have made it abundantly clear that their top pick for president is Obama. They wouldn't want to bring negative attention to him by mentioning the destabalizing of a nation by a man he has connections to.



I read somewhere recently (maybe here even) that he wants to give BILLIONS of US dollars to Africa anyway. Like that wouldn't go into a Mgube-type pocket.


:rolleyes:
 

dcamp2002

Inactive
"The Kenyan's are just the latest to suffer the results of news companies chasing ratings and leaving true news on the backburners, instead of doing the right thing."

Maybe the press just doesn't want a machete in the back.

David
 

IM Benedict

Inactive
Seeker, you got it. The bigger story is that radical Islam has designs on Sub-Saharan Africa. Islam has been an enemy of Africa for many centuries. They participated with corrupt leadership in establishing the slave trade, and have never lost their hunger for these lands and people. As Islamic slave merchants were not friends of the west in the 17th century, radical Islam is no friend today. Their intent is to fill the vacuum that would exist without the West's strong involvement at this time. Imagine how Israel would feel if Kenya would join the ranks for Somalia, Tunisia, Morrocco, Sudan, Egypt, Lybya, Ethiopia..... Imagine the challenges our miitary would face without ports on Africa's East coast.

IM Benedict watching and praying
 

Pocolow

Inactive
The events in Kenya are being widely covered on the BBC in the UK. It should be noted that Kenya prior to these events was one of the most stable African countries and that it is a popular holiday destination .The conflict arising in Kenya has nothing to with Islam, but corrupt politicians and vote rigging.( something the US should know about)
 

almost ready

Inactive
No, it's the other guy, the loser who is obama's cousin

Obama's grandpa was a great revolutionary leader there, Jerimoji Oginga Odinga, the first vp under the new regime. Obama's Uncle Raila uses the same catch phrases in his campaign as Obama:

Vote for Change

Register for Change

Equitable sharing of resources for all constituents

and appears to be reading off the same page.

It is pretty clear this new civil war wasn't expected, rather uncle Raila was expected to win, and it was a no-news day. The Democrats probably don't really want to hear Obama being asked by reporters about Grampga Oginga Odinga and Cousin Raila.

http://www.raila07.com/

I just think it's all funnier than heck. I mean, who could have expected that the top candidate (by most tallies) for the presidency is the nephew of a Kenyan revolutionary in trouble?


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7176683.stm
 

Richard

TB Fanatic
at least even the UN is beginning to realise that tribalism is Africa's equivalent of racism, yes it is unreported in the UK or just categorised as "unrest" by the BBC with no real political analysis
 

Richard

TB Fanatic
The events in Kenya are being widely covered on the BBC in the UK. It should be noted that Kenya prior to these events was one of the most stable African countries and that it is a popular holiday destination .The conflict arising in Kenya has nothing to with Islam, but corrupt politicians and vote rigging.( something the US should know about)

yes but why should it lead to killings, riots and social deterioration, OK the WHOLE continent of AFRICA has corrupt politicians
 

IM Benedict

Inactive
Pocolow, on this I beg to differ. Trust me-I am informed on this issue. I did not intend to suggest that Islam is the catalyst for the current trouble. What I am saying is that the Islamists desire instability. I am in relationship with many, many people in this part of the world, and have spent a fair amount of time on the ground there. This is a problem with dire implications for the entire continent.

IM Benedict watching and praying
 

LeViolinist

Veteran Member
Pocolow, on this I beg to differ. Trust me-I am informed on this issue. I did not intend to suggest that Islam is the catalyst for the current trouble. What I am saying is that the Islamists desire instability. I am in relationship with many, many people in this part of the world, and have spent a fair amount of time on the ground there. This is a problem with dire implications for the entire continent.

IM Benedict watching and praying


Exactly, and the tribal disputes are dry sprigs for the fire.
LeV
 

Richard

TB Fanatic
The events in Kenya are being widely covered on the BBC in the UK. It should be noted that Kenya prior to these events was one of the most stable African countries and that it is a popular holiday destination .The conflict arising in Kenya has nothing to with Islam, but corrupt politicians and vote rigging.( something the US should know about)

more vote rigging and corrupt politicians in Africa - home grown

http://www.zimbabwesituation.com/feb4_2008.html#Z7

Zimbabwe: an election whose outcome is predetermined

Zim Online

by Mutumwa Mawere Monday 04 February 2008

JOHANNESBURG - Zimbabwe finds itself at the crossroads and the bank created
at independence in 1980 of justice, freedom and equality seems to be
bankrupt and it is evident that the promissory note that was given to
citizens at independence will not be honored on March 29.

A central bank should ordinarily represent a repository of trust and
integrity but the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe (RBZ) has been reduced to a
theatre of games and machinations while the nation is at its knees groping
for solutions and desperate for direction and answers.

At last week’s announcement of the monetary policy statement, Dr Gideon Gono
had this to say: "We have chosen a low-key presentation of this monetary
policy statement for strategic reasons while we prepare for a comprehensive
post-elections policy program.’’

He also made a startling revelation that the RBZ would come up with a
post-elections monetary policy blueprint that will cover a 24-month recovery
programme stretching from May 2008 through to April 2010.

It appears that Gono already knows the outcome of the general elections
otherwise he would have been cautious instead of preempting the actions of a
new administration particularly given that this landmark election will
involve presidential, parliamentary and local choices.

It appears that Gono has already discounted the possibility of any other
outcome than the victory of ZANU-PF.

In line with his belief that ZANU-PF will win the election, Gono said that
the post election programme will focus on, among other things, the removal
of pricing distortions in such areas as fuel, agricultural inputs and
outputs, multiple interest and exchange rates, electricity, water and other
municipal and parastatal service charges.

Does this not sound familiar? Is it not the same Gono who said failure was
not an option?

Why would citizens of Zimbabwe place their trust on him after the elections?
If these policies make sense now, why defer them to the post-election
period? Is it the change that Zimbabweans should vote for on 29 March 2008?

He also said that the government will also look at the subsidies policy with
a view to scrapping untargeted general subsidies, amend investment laws, and
boost productivity through incentives for key sectors — agriculture, mining,
tourism and manufacturing.

The governor who is increasingly assuming the role of an unelected President
had no kind words for government ministries, local authorities, parastatals
and some sections of the business community which he alleged have over the
years failed to take heed of policy advice and warnings from the central
bank as if to suggest that these state institutions are now accountable to
him.

Under what constitutional order would a governor of the central bank make
such statements? It can only be when a democratic order has been
irretrievably broken. It is important for citizens to record all the words
of Gono because they help in exposing the extent of the breakdown of the
rule of law and the collapse of the state.

As is now characteristic of Gono, he spared no effort to lament the impact
of the sanctions imposed on the country by the European Union, the United
States and their allies, saying there were "considerable attempts being made
to dismantle Zimbabwe’s economic fabric through a combination of armory".

He was also reported to have said: "The subtle nature of some of these
sanctions has regrettably escaped the eyes of some stakeholders here at home
and many others in the world community who, instead, are interpreting
Zimbabwe’s current difficulties as a product of domestic policy imbalances.’’

With respect to the impact of sanctions, he was of the view that the
freezing of donor-supported programmes, withdrawal of external lines of
credit and balance of payments support and the denial of Zimbabwe’s access
to the Global Fund for health-related programmes had combined to create the
economic crisis.

He then attempted to justify his questionable and possibly corrupt
quasi-fiscal activities by saying that the RBZ had been forced to carry
extraordinary responsibilities outside its core business to ensure that the
country was fed and had fuel, among other things.

Gono was supposed to appear before the Budget and Finance Committee of the
recently dissolved parliament to expose the so-called cash barons but it was
reported that the meeting was now postponed and will only take place after
the elections by which time there may be new players in parliament.

Gono is firmly in control of economic actors who are reduced to beggars for
this or that dispensation on the false premise that the RBZ has an existence
outside the control of citizens.

While it is universally accepted that no state can exist on its own it is
clearly evident in the Gono construction that with or without elections,
ZANU-PF will be in charge and by deductive logic he will be in power as well
to continue to play tactical games with people’s resources and steal their
future through manipulative actions.

* Mutumwa Mawere is a Zimbabwean-born South African businessman based in


and theres more

Supporters of pro-Mugabe bishop blockade cathedral, locking out worshippers

International Herald Tribune

The Associated PressPublished: February 3, 2008

HARARE, Zimbabwe: Supporters of an Anglican bishop who is a staunch
supporter of Zimbabwe's ruling party blockaded Harare's cathedral Sunday,
preventing the swearing-in ceremony of his elected successor. Police ignored
a court order and did not intervene.

Gangs of supporters of Bishop Nolbert Kunonga locked the doors and gates to
the cloisters of St. Mary's Anglican Cathedral in downtown Harare and at
least two worshippers who tried to enter were assaulted, witnesses said.

The High Court on Thursday ruled that the swearing-in of Bishop Sebastian
Bakare, voted bishop of the Harare Anglican province by local churches to
replace Kunonga, should go ahead and Bakare's followers should be allowed to
worship in the cathedral.

But from early Sunday, Kunonga's supporters circled the cathedral entrances
and barred entry to churchgoers showing up for Sunday services.

A few police, watched by witnesses and reporters, did not intervene.

Bakare was later installed in an "investiture" ceremony as the new caretaker
Anglican bishop of Harare at a service attended by several thousand
worshippers at a sports arena across the city.
The standoff was the latest incident in a bitter dispute that has racked the
Anglican Church in Zimbabwe since Kunonga last year refused to hand over the
cathedral, its administrative offices, its check accounts and vehicles to
church elders after losing the election for bishop.

In January, Kunonga declared he was breaking away from the Church of the
Province of Central Africa, the regional Anglican governing body, and
declared the formation of an independent Anglican Harare diocese that
retained him as its leader.

But in his court ruling Thursday, Judge Charles Hungwe ruled that
declaration invalid, saying church elders across the region had not accepted
the schism and it violated longstanding constitutional rules of the Anglican
church in central and southern Africa.

He dismissed an appeal by Kunonga to bar Bakare from using church property
for worship and said "men of the cloth ought to resolve their differences in
a God-fearing manner."

In an earlier ruling last month, the High Court permitted both Kunonga's and
Bakare's followers to hold services in the cathedral at separate times while
the issue of the bishop's post was resolved. Scuffles occurred at those
services, watched over by armed police, and in one incident Kunonga snatched
Bakare's bible from his grasp and threw it across the cathedral nave.

In 2004, Kunonga faced a regional church court on allegations of incitement
to murder, fostering ruling party politics, ethnic hatred and incitement
from the pulpit during the often-violent seizures ordered by Mugabe and the
ruling party of thousands of white-owned farms since 2000, and using
intimidation against his opponents.

That court adjourned in confusion and rancor before it could make a ruling
on the behavior of Kunonga, a former lecturer in liberation theology in the
United States.

Soon after becoming Harare bishop, Kunonga ordered the removal of memorial
plaques and insignia honoring the country's dead before independence in
1980, including those of black soldiers who fought alongside the forces of
Britain, the former colonial ruler, in World War II.

Last month, the Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams, head of the
worldwide Anglican Church, said he unequivocally condemned the use of armed
police and state machinery to intimidate Kunonga's opponents.

"Kunonga's position has become increasingly untenable within the Anglican
Church over the last year, as he has consistently refused to maintain
appropriate levels of independence from the Zimbabwean Government," Williams
said.
Johannesburg.

Chaos mars ZANU PF primary elections in Bulawayo

Zim Online

by Lizwe Sebatha Monday 04 February 2008

BULAWAYO – ZANU PF party primary elections to choose the party’s
parliamentary and council election candidates in Bulawayo for next March’s
polls had to be postponed last weekend following violent clashes between
party supporters over the selection process.

The police had to be called in to quell the violent disturbances at Davies
Hall after candidates aligned to controversial war veterans’ leader,
Jabulani Sibanda, accused the party’s provincial leadership of attempting to
sideline them in the selection of candidates.

Sibanda is leading a rival faction of ZANU PF that is bitterly opposed to
the party’s ‘old guard’ of politburo member, Dumiso Dabengwa, ZANU PF
national chairman, John Nkomo and Vice-President Joseph Msika.

ZANU PF spokesman for Bulawayo province, Effort Nkomo, confirmed the
disturbances yesterday adding that the party had since agreed to move the
primary elections to a later date.

“We called off the primary elections because of the disturbances by some
party members on Friday. The selection of candidates would be held at a
later date which would be announced soon,” Nkomo said.

President Robert Mugabe’s ruling ZANU PF party is currently conducting
primary elections around the country to choose candidates to run for the
party in the March 29 elections.

Zimbabweans go to the polls next March to choose a new president,
parliamentarians and councilors in the elections that analysts say are a
prerequisite to plucking the country out of an eight-year political crisis.

Contacted for comment yesterday over the disturbances in Bulawayo, Sibanda
said: “There is a lot of rubbish happening in that province. I was not there
but I received reports that the elections were postponed because of attempts
to impose candidates by sidelining other aspiring candidates.”

Sibanda, who was fired from ZANU PF in 2004 after he allegedly sought to
block the rise of Vice-President Joice Mujuru, has been a constant thorn in
the flesh of the ZANU PF ‘old guard’ in Matabeleland.

The ZANU PF old guard in Matabeleland insists that Sibanda, who organised
controversial marches in support of Mugabe last year, should be barred from
conducting any party business until his matter has been comprehensively
dealt with by the party’s disciplinary committee. - ZimOnline

Supporters of pro-Mugabe bishop blockade cathedral, locking out worshippers

International Herald Tribune

The Associated PressPublished: February 3, 2008

HARARE, Zimbabwe: Supporters of an Anglican bishop who is a staunch
supporter of Zimbabwe's ruling party blockaded Harare's cathedral Sunday,
preventing the swearing-in ceremony of his elected successor. Police ignored
a court order and did not intervene.

Gangs of supporters of Bishop Nolbert Kunonga locked the doors and gates to
the cloisters of St. Mary's Anglican Cathedral in downtown Harare and at
least two worshippers who tried to enter were assaulted, witnesses said.

The High Court on Thursday ruled that the swearing-in of Bishop Sebastian
Bakare, voted bishop of the Harare Anglican province by local churches to
replace Kunonga, should go ahead and Bakare's followers should be allowed to
worship in the cathedral.

But from early Sunday, Kunonga's supporters circled the cathedral entrances
and barred entry to churchgoers showing up for Sunday services.

A few police, watched by witnesses and reporters, did not intervene.

Bakare was later installed in an "investiture" ceremony as the new caretaker
Anglican bishop of Harare at a service attended by several thousand
worshippers at a sports arena across the city.
The standoff was the latest incident in a bitter dispute that has racked the
Anglican Church in Zimbabwe since Kunonga last year refused to hand over the
cathedral, its administrative offices, its check accounts and vehicles to
church elders after losing the election for bishop.

In January, Kunonga declared he was breaking away from the Church of the
Province of Central Africa, the regional Anglican governing body, and
declared the formation of an independent Anglican Harare diocese that
retained him as its leader.

But in his court ruling Thursday, Judge Charles Hungwe ruled that
declaration invalid, saying church elders across the region had not accepted
the schism and it violated longstanding constitutional rules of the Anglican
church in central and southern Africa.

He dismissed an appeal by Kunonga to bar Bakare from using church property
for worship and said "men of the cloth ought to resolve their differences in
a God-fearing manner."

In an earlier ruling last month, the High Court permitted both Kunonga's and
Bakare's followers to hold services in the cathedral at separate times while
the issue of the bishop's post was resolved. Scuffles occurred at those
services, watched over by armed police, and in one incident Kunonga snatched
Bakare's bible from his grasp and threw it across the cathedral nave.

In 2004, Kunonga faced a regional church court on allegations of incitement
to murder, fostering ruling party politics, ethnic hatred and incitement
from the pulpit during the often-violent seizures ordered by Mugabe and the
ruling party of thousands of white-owned farms since 2000, and using
intimidation against his opponents.

That court adjourned in confusion and rancor before it could make a ruling
on the behavior of Kunonga, a former lecturer in liberation theology in the
United States.

Soon after becoming Harare bishop, Kunonga ordered the removal of memorial
plaques and insignia honoring the country's dead before independence in
1980, including those of black soldiers who fought alongside the forces of
Britain, the former colonial ruler, in World War II.

Last month, the Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams, head of the
worldwide Anglican Church, said he unequivocally condemned the use of armed
police and state machinery to intimidate Kunonga's opponents.

"Kunonga's position has become increasingly untenable within the Anglican
Church over the last year, as he has consistently refused to maintain
appropriate levels of independence from the Zimbabwean Government," Williams
said.
 
Last edited:

almost ready

Inactive
I'd have to agree with Richard

This seems to be about vote-rigging and a surprise election result. Obviously, there is much underneath, as this is just a trigger.

It would be fair to say Obama's Uncle was the Winner of the election, not the loser, but that the victory was stolen from him. There is no sign that Islam is an issue one way or another. He is a secular guy, engineer, and it is a fight against croneyism and corruption.

It usually happens in such cases that the loser's party, if battles ensue, get tarred with "terrorist" or "underworld, such as drug" brushes, soon after the election ends. So it's no surprise that the US media doesn't know how to handle this. Will Uncle Raila be shunned as an insurgent by TPTB? Already there are rumblings that he is a sore loser and troublemaker....didn't we just see this in Mexico?
 

jmj

Inactive
http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=285292746454291

The candidate already has heeded his church's "nonnegotiable commitment to Africa," spending an inordinate amount of his campaign time on the Kenyan crisis, for one. Obama has close family ties to Kenya, and even founded a school in his ancestral village — the Senator Obama School.

In the bloody conflict there, which already has claimed some 700 lives, Obama appears to have sided with opposition leader Raila Odinga, head of the same Luo tribe to which Obama's late Muslim father belonged.

Obama's older brother still lives there. Abongo "Roy" Obama is a Luo activist and a militant Muslim who argues that the black man must "liberate himself from the poisoning influences of European culture." He urges his younger brother to embrace his African heritage.

Beyond family politics, these ties have potential foreign policy, even national security, implications.

Odinga is a Marxist who reportedly has made a pact with a hard-line Islamic group in Kenya to establish Shariah courts throughout the country. He has also vowed to ban booze and pork and impose Muslim dress codes on women — moves favored by Obama's brother.

With al-Qaida strengthening its beachheads in Africa — from Algeria to Sudan to Somalia — the last thing the West needs is for pro-Western Kenya to fall into the hands of Islamic extremists.

Yet Obama interrupted his New Hampshire campaigning to speak by phone with Odinga, who claims to be his cousin. He did not speak with Kenyan President Mwai Kibaki.

Would Obama put African tribal or family interests ahead of U.S. interests?
 

Lynn

Inactive
Full Post
Posted Monday, January 14, 2008 4:27 PM
For Kenyans, Barack is a Hero
Newsweek
By Andrew Ehrenkranz


credit: Simon Maina / AFP-Getty Images

When Barack Obama visited Kenya in 2006, a local beer called Senator promptly became a bestseller. Indeed, so closely did the beverage become associated with the U.S. presidential contender that visitors nowadays don’t even need to get the name right—just ask at a local bar for a cold Obama and they’ll know exactly what to serve you.

Obama is a revered figure here in Kenya, where his father, also called Barack, grew up in the tiny village of Kogelo, near Lake Victoria. And even as Kenya’s post-election turmoil continues to claim lives, the citizens of this African nation are keeping up with the political fortunes of their favorite son. They’re gratified that he’s keeping up with theirs too. Indeed, with a ban on live news broadcasts keeping the rumor mill well fed, some even believe that the Illinois senator is actively intervening to help forge a political solution to the violent outbursts following the country’s disputed Dec. 27 ballot. He isn’t, given that he’s kind of busy right now, but Sammy Nyongesa, a member of the presidential campaign team for Raila Odinga says his boss has been in email contact with the American senator. According to Nyongesa, Obama wrote to Odinga—who is protesting the victory claims by incumbent President Mwai Kibaki in an election widely considered irregular—asking Odinga to persuade his supporters to bring peace. Odinga’s response: “I’m doing what I can.”

Odinga, usually referred to as Raila, certainly hasn’t hesitated to play up his Obama connections on the Kenyan campaign trail. When Obama announced his bid for the presidency, Raila flew to Illinois to take his place among the senator’s supporters. Upon his return to Nairobi, Raila held a press conference on the steps on Kenya’s Parliament, holding up a picture of him and Obama together. “I was with my brother, “Raila said to reporters--and then launched into his own campaign stump speech.

In fact, Obama and Raila may not even be related. But they’ve kept in touch since Obama was elected to the Senate. Obama’s father was of the same Luo tribe as Odinga and many of his Orange Democratic Movement supporters; Obama’s father and Odinga’s father, the late Luo chief and Kenyan freedom fighter turned politician, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga, were close friends. Not surprisingly, that means that Obama has overwhelming support among the Luo.

In tougher, poorer areas of Nairobi, machete-wielding Luos in gangs like the Taliban consider Obama “family”, and will happily translate the lyrics to Odinga’s campaign song, “Agwambo Malo Malo”, that includes words of praise for Obama: “Obama and Raila are brothers. Obama is the victor on the other side.” In one huddle of about 35 Luo men and women in a Taliban enclave where the slogan NO RAILA, NO PEACE, is sprayed on many stone walls, all agree that Obama’s orders would mean as much to them as commands from their own Raila. “Please pass this message to Obama,” a 28-year-old man named Tobias asked. “Tell him to help us, tell him we are suffering here.”

Even non-Luo want Obama to win the White House. In a Nairobi tavern called The Veranda, one of the affluent young patrons wore an Obama ’08 campaign T-shirt as he shot pool. The student, a Kikuyu who supports incumbent Kibaki, was impressively well versed in Obama’s momentum in the primaries and his place in U.S. politics. For him, Obama was not just a personal role model, but a beacon of hope for Africans trying to succeed elsewhere. So would a President Obama be able to help Africa. Not really. “We have to solve our own problems,” he said. “And so do you people.”


http://www.blog.newsweek.com/blogs/ov/archive/2008/01/14/for-kenyans-barack-is-a-hero.aspx
 

Lynn

Inactive
OBAMA’S ‘CLOSE FRIEND’
January 6th, 2008 by Aurora



American presidential frontrunner, Barack Obama has some very ugly skeletons in the closet in Kenya. Apart from his family links to Islam, it seems that Obama has some pretty bloodthirsty, extremist friends in the country.

In April 2007, a New York Times article had some interesting comments to make about Obama’s family. Sarah Hussein Obama of Kenya, Barack Obama’s stepgrandmother, is a lifelong Muslim. “I am a strong believer of the Islamic faith,” she says.

But the real shock comes this past weekend as Raila Odinga, Obama’s friend, lost the election in Kenya. First some background on Odinga:

Raila Odinga has, in his own words, a “close personal friendship” with Barrack Hussein Obama Junior. When Obama went to Kenya in August of 2006, he was hosted by Raila and spoke in praise of him at rallies in Nairobi… Obama’s bias for his fellow Luo was so blatant that a Kenya government spokesman denounced Obama during his visit as Raila’s “stooge.”

In the recent elections in Kenya, violence broke out as Raila lost the elections:

This past weekend, women and children — entire families — were burned alive as a crowd of Kenyans torched a church where they had gathered to protect themselves.

The cause of the violence was Odinga’s inflammatory comments about the election:

When Raila Odinga lost the presidential election last week (12/27) to Mwai Kibaki, he claimed the vote was rigged, whereupon his tribal followers went on murderous rampages such as in the town of Eldoret, where on New Years Day dozens of people were burned to death in a church set on fire… Throughout Kenya, hundreds of people have been politically murdered in the last few days.

…Raila has now made a deal for support from the Soviets’ successors as world-champion enemies of the West and democratic freedoms: Muslim fundamentalists… The Evangelical Alliance of Kenya has posted on its website a photograph copy of a Memorandum of Understanding, dated and signed on August 29, 2007, between Raila Odinga and Shiekh Abdullah Abdi, chairman of the National Muslim Leaders Forum of Kenya…

Here is a summary on the agreement which was signed:

* It pledges the support of Kenyan Moslems for Raila’s election. In return, as President of Kenya, Raila agrees to 14 actions, listed a) through n) on page two.

* Within 6 months re-write the Constitution of Kenya to recognize Shariah as the only true law sanctioned by the Holy Quran for Muslim declared regions.

* Within one year facilitate the establishment of a Shariah court in every Kenyan divisional headquarters. [Note: everywhere in Kenya, not just in “Muslim declared regions.”]

* “Popularize Islam, the only true religion… by ordering every primary school in Kenya in the regions to conduct daily Madrassa classes.”
* “Impose a total ban on open-air gospel crusades by worshippers of the cross…”
* “Outlaw gospel programs… on KBC, the National Broadcaster.”
* “Impose a total ban on the public consumption of alcoholic beverages…”
* “Impose an immediate ban on women’s public dressing styles that are considered immoral and offensive to the Muslim faith…”

Obama then, is revealed as a sympathizer with hardline Islamist Sharia government and the mainstream press is NOT REPORTING ON THIS. It is their duty to expose this kind of important news to INFORM the American public and not simply propagandize for the party of their choice! But the MSM’s attitude, traitorous as it is, is hardly surprising since Obama is presently the frontrunner in the American presidential election at the moment. Basically on the Democrat side, you have a neck to neck race between Obama, an Islamist sympathizer and Clinton, a hardline socialist who wants to destroy the economy of America.

Obama is clearly lying if he is ‘the stooge’ of this Sharia loving, Christian hating Islamist extremist. If he gets into power in the U.S. will he show his true sympathies after duping the American people?



http://www.themidnightsun.org/?p=1613
 

Mzkitty

I give up.
OBAMA’S ‘CLOSE FRIEND’
January 6th, 2008 by Aurora



American presidential frontrunner, Barack Obama has some very ugly skeletons in the closet in Kenya. Apart from his family links to Islam, it seems that Obama has some pretty bloodthirsty, extremist friends in the country.

In April 2007, a New York Times article had some interesting comments to make about Obama’s family. Sarah Hussein Obama of Kenya, Barack Obama’s stepgrandmother, is a lifelong Muslim. “I am a strong believer of the Islamic faith,” she says.

But the real shock comes this past weekend as Raila Odinga, Obama’s friend, lost the election in Kenya. First some background on Odinga:

Raila Odinga has, in his own words, a “close personal friendship” with Barrack Hussein Obama Junior. When Obama went to Kenya in August of 2006, he was hosted by Raila and spoke in praise of him at rallies in Nairobi… Obama’s bias for his fellow Luo was so blatant that a Kenya government spokesman denounced Obama during his visit as Raila’s “stooge.”

In the recent elections in Kenya, violence broke out as Raila lost the elections:

This past weekend, women and children — entire families — were burned alive as a crowd of Kenyans torched a church where they had gathered to protect themselves.

The cause of the violence was Odinga’s inflammatory comments about the election:

When Raila Odinga lost the presidential election last week (12/27) to Mwai Kibaki, he claimed the vote was rigged, whereupon his tribal followers went on murderous rampages such as in the town of Eldoret, where on New Years Day dozens of people were burned to death in a church set on fire… Throughout Kenya, hundreds of people have been politically murdered in the last few days.

…Raila has now made a deal for support from the Soviets’ successors as world-champion enemies of the West and democratic freedoms: Muslim fundamentalists… The Evangelical Alliance of Kenya has posted on its website a photograph copy of a Memorandum of Understanding, dated and signed on August 29, 2007, between Raila Odinga and Shiekh Abdullah Abdi, chairman of the National Muslim Leaders Forum of Kenya…

Here is a summary on the agreement which was signed:

* It pledges the support of Kenyan Moslems for Raila’s election. In return, as President of Kenya, Raila agrees to 14 actions, listed a) through n) on page two.

* Within 6 months re-write the Constitution of Kenya to recognize Shariah as the only true law sanctioned by the Holy Quran for Muslim declared regions.

* Within one year facilitate the establishment of a Shariah court in every Kenyan divisional headquarters. [Note: everywhere in Kenya, not just in “Muslim declared regions.”]

* “Popularize Islam, the only true religion… by ordering every primary school in Kenya in the regions to conduct daily Madrassa classes.”
* “Impose a total ban on open-air gospel crusades by worshippers of the cross…”
* “Outlaw gospel programs… on KBC, the National Broadcaster.”
* “Impose a total ban on the public consumption of alcoholic beverages…”
* “Impose an immediate ban on women’s public dressing styles that are considered immoral and offensive to the Muslim faith…”

Obama then, is revealed as a sympathizer with hardline Islamist Sharia government and the mainstream press is NOT REPORTING ON THIS. It is their duty to expose this kind of important news to INFORM the American public and not simply propagandize for the party of their choice! But the MSM’s attitude, traitorous as it is, is hardly surprising since Obama is presently the frontrunner in the American presidential election at the moment. Basically on the Democrat side, you have a neck to neck race between Obama, an Islamist sympathizer and Clinton, a hardline socialist who wants to destroy the economy of America.

Obama is clearly lying if he is ‘the stooge’ of this Sharia loving, Christian hating Islamist extremist. If he gets into power in the U.S. will he show his true sympathies after duping the American people?



http://www.themidnightsun.org/?p=1613


This needs bumping.

:dvl2:
 

Hokey

Veteran Member
Another bump, more of Africa being ignored by US MSM.

Watch Chad.

http://www.canadaeast.com/front/article/201897

Rebels say they withdrew from Chad capital to give populace chance to escape

THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published Monday February 4th, 2008
NAIROBI, Kenya - Chadian rebels said Monday they withdrew voluntarily from Chad's capital overnight.

It was unclear if they succumbed to the force of helicopter gunships and tanks deployed by government forces. Rebel spokesman Abderaman Koulamallah said: "We decided to retreat to give the population a chance to get out."

On Sunday, tanks rolled through N'Djamena, turning the streets into a battle zone between the government and rebels. Fighting also raged in an area where some 420,000 refugees live near the border with Darfur.

Chad and its former colonizer, France, accused Sudan of masterminding the coup attempt in the oil-rich Central African country. Sudan has repeatedly denied any involvement in the fighting.

Hundreds of rebels penetrated the capital Saturday. The violence has endangered a $300-million global aid operation supporting millions of people in Chad. It also has delayed the deployment of a European Union peacekeeping mission to both Chad and neighbouring Central African Republic.

France accused Sudan of wanting to crush President Idriss Deby's regime ahead of the arrival of the EU force, which is to operate along the volatile border with Darfur.

The force was to be based in the area of the key eastern town Adre, which rebels said they seized Sunday. The government said it had repelled the attack. Adre, near the border with Darfur, is a humanitarian hub surrounded by camps with some 420,000 refugees from Darfur and Chadians displaced in the spillover from the violence.

Chadian Gen. Mahamat Ali Abdallah Nassour alleged Sudanese troops were involved and called it a "declaration of war" from Sudan.

"Sudan does not want this force because it would open a window on the genocide in Darfur," Chad's Foreign Minister Amad Allam-Mi said on Radio France Internationale.

In a statement Sunday, Sudan's Foreign Ministry spokesman Ali al-Sadeq said: "We would like to stress that Sudan does not provide any assistance to any side" in Chad.

"Any developments in Chad reflect on Sudan and any instability there would have a negative impact on Sudan," he said.

In Ottawa, the Department of Foreign Affairs warned Canadians against travelling to Chad. It also said the honorary consul in N'Djamena was contacting some 40 Canadians in the country.

"Canadians in the area are being advised to stay indoors and to wait for the situation to calm down," the department said.

It also said Canadian diplomats in neighbouring Cameroon were working with their French and U.S. counterparts on evacuating Canadians interested in leaving the country.

The U.S. Embassy in N'Djamena said Sunday it was temporarily closing and relocating all of its operations and remaining staff to the airport. It had authorized the departure of its non-essential staff. The United Nations also said it was temporarily evacuating its staff.

French soldiers in N'Djamena began evacuating foreigners Saturday night and nearly 400 had left by midday Sunday, said a French military spokesman, Capt. Christophe Prazuck.

One foreign aid worker described the scene in N'Djamena on Sunday as "bloody and chaotic" with bodies littering the streets and looters breaking into shops during lulls in the fighting. Gunfire could be heard coming from the area around the presidential palace, said the aid worker, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

The death toll from the fighting was not known. But the French organization Medecins sans Frontieres reported they had operated on about 50 wounded people - only one a combatant - since Saturday at a hospital in the capital. A spokesman in Paris said the Chadian Red Cross told MSF doctors they had counted about 200 wounded. The civilians had been hit by stray bullets, MSF said.

Hundreds of people are fleeing the fighting, crossing the Chari River to Kousseri, in neighbouring Cameroon. Helene Caux with the UN refugee agency said at least 400 had crossed and "people are still coming." She said her agency needed to confirm the refugees were civilians with no fighters among them.

The rebels arrived Friday on the capital's outskirts in about 250 pickup trucks mounted with machine-guns after a three-day push across the desert from Chad's eastern border with Sudan. They entered the city early Saturday, quickly spreading through the streets.

The fighting resumed around dawn Sunday, a French military spokesman said, and government forces were using tanks and helicopter gunships to try and repel the rebels, who were battling back with assault weapons, rocket-propelled grenades and machine guns.

Several international workers in the Darfur town el-Geneina in Sudan confirmed Chadian rebels had left their nearby bases in recent days and were reported to have crossed into Chad. They spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue.

French and U.S. statements condemning the coup attempt have referred to the rebels coming from outside the country.

France offered to whisk Deby out of Chad, Defence Minister Herve Morin said Sunday. Deby apparently refused to flee.

Chad has been convulsed by civil wars and invasions since independence from France in 1960. The recent discovery of oil has only increased the intensity of the power struggles in the largely desert country, and another Chadian rebel group launched a failed assault on N'Djamena in 2006.

The rebels fighting in the city are a coalition of three groups. The biggest is led by Mahamat Nouri, a former diplomat who defected 16 months ago. They others are led Timan Erdimi, a nephew of Deby who was his chief of staff and the third is a breakaway from Nouri's group headed by Adelwahid Aboud. They have long been fighting to overthrow Deby, whom they accuse of corruption.

The rebels are also angry with the president for not providing what they consider enough support to insurgents in Sudan's Darfur region, some of whom are from Deby's own tribe, the Zaghawa, who are found in both Chad and Sudan.

Deby, who came to power at the head of a rebellion in 1990, has won elections since but none deemed free or fair. He brought a semblance of peace after three decades of civil war and an invasion by Libya, but became increasingly isolated.

The most recent rebellions in Chad began in 2005 in the east, erupting at the same time as Darfur conflict in Sudan. More than 200,000 people have died in five years of fighting between ethnic African tribes and Sudanese government forces and 2.5 million have been driven from their homes.

- With files from The Canadian Press.
 

almost ready

Inactive
Keep pulling on this string

this is getting interesting

If Obama campaigned for the guy whose supporters massacred those people seeking sanctuary in the Christian Church

and if Obama's Uncle really promised to impose Sharia law, against his website imaging that he seeks to have a secular globalist government, well that's something.

snip from Mz Kitty's post

The Evangelical Alliance of Kenya has posted on its website a photograph copy of a Memorandum of Understanding, dated and signed on August 29, 2007, between Raila Odinga and Shiekh Abdullah Abdi, chairman of the National Muslim Leaders Forum of Kenya…

This is huge.

Almost unbelievable. Except for the church massacre, which fits this scenario exactly. Such a horror.

Grievous days.

Obviously, the Democrats will have to drop him one way or another. They'll try to make it look like the bad Republicans did it. Maybe make a fuss about his recent drug/gay sex allegations? Then many will be mad at the Repubs for outing his partying and keep the protest vote at the dems for this. Clinton/edwards?

If people see that the Dems have elevated such a lout to high station, in light of the Kenya connection only, the Dems will suffer. No wonder TPTB's mouthpieces haven't said anything on ABCNBCCBSCNNFOX. They've been counting on a Hillary/Obama ticket winning the WH. Rupert Murdoch and Lord Rothschild must be fuming mad at the recent turn of events. This will be tough to cover up.

Perhaps they have enough clout with the GOP to get them to roll over on this one. We'll see, won't we:whistle:. Hard to keep a secret once the internet gets ahold of it.
 

almost ready

Inactive
Let's see if I got this straight

Last year, Barak Obama campaigned for his muslim uncle, who presented himself as offering a secular globalist government on his website, but secretly promised the Imams to turn over an entire region as an autonomous muslim state with Sharia law, in writing.

http://www.raila07.com/

http://eakenya.org/newsevents/article.htm?id=8

Got that so far. When he didn't win the election, his followers massacred dozens of folks who had holed up in the Christian Church hoping for sanctuary. Any idea who were in the Church? Were they in the region where the Imams were promised Sharia law and autonomy if Riala won?

Do you think the Democrats believe Obama is teflon, and this won't effect his electibility?

In my opinion, it's a serious issue. Only a couple days ago, we were reading (and agreeing) here that Obama "couldn't choose his relatives". But since he campaigned for him, it's a different matter now. The fact that there campaign slogans are identical and they're both socialists can't be put off as coincidence anymore.
 
=





It isn't only Kenyan and Chad involved in conflict(s). The Congo and Somilia are in it to - France is threatening military action (in defense of Chad govt against the rebels ~ Dutch



Thousands of refugees flee Chad

Tuesday, 5 February 2008, 16:37 GMT
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/7228572.stm

Thousands of refugees are streaming out of Chad into Cameroon, placing heavy strain on the Cameroon town of Kousseri near the border, the UN has said.
It said up to 20,000 people had crossed the river border since Saturday, when rebels stormed the capital N'Djamena.

The UN's refugee agency said aid supplies and better accommodation were urgently needed for the refugees.


The rebels have now retreated from N'Djamena, and France has threatened to step in if they launch another assault.

Former colonial power France has 1,400 troops in Chad and has helped to evacuate foreigners from the city.

'Continuous flow'

On Tuesday, "frightened people were still crossing in a continuous flow" from Chad into neighbouring Cameroon, said the UN's refugee agency in a news release.

Thousands have deluged Kousseri in Cameroon, UNHCR said.

I telephoned my friend in N'Djamena and he told me that my mother, my father and my fiancee had all been shot - I don't know whether to cry or kill myself

"Mohammed", refugee


Refugee's gruelling escape

While some have found refuge with relatives, in schools or hotels, it said, between 6,000 and 7,000 were staying out in the open at a transit centre near the bridge.

UNHCR said it planned to move these people to an old campsite some 30km away which could hold up to 100,000 people and was equipped with wells.

Two UNHCR aid airlifts are due to arrive this week in the border area.

One refugee, who preferred not to give his name, escaped the fighting in Chad and fled south to Nigeria.

"I am now in Kano but have no money left and don't have my documents," he told the BBC.

"I don't know what to do. I telephoned my friend in N'Djamena and he told me that my mother, my father and my fiancee had all been shot. I don't know whether to cry or kill myself."

French threat

France said it would be prepared to intervene in the conflict, after a UN Security Council statement "strongly condemned" the rebel offensive.




Q: Rebellion in Chad
French diplomatic tight-rope

Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner said he "hoped" the French troops in the city would not have to intervene.

President Nicolas Sarkozy said France would "do its duty" if necessary.

The tripartite alliance of rebels, meanwhile, has offered a ceasefire, news agencies reported, but it was unclear on what terms.

Spokesman Abderaman Koulamallah told AFP news agency the rebels were bowing to diplomatic pressure to halt their offensive against the government of President Idriss Deby.

But another spokesman, Henchi Ordjo, told Reuters the ceasefire was conditional on President Deby stepping down.

Prime Minister Nouradine Delwa Kassire Coumakoye was dismissive of the offer.

"Why a ceasefire?" he told French TV station France 24.

"They don't exist any more. With whom would we sign a ceasefire?... We've got them under control."

Sudan accused

African Union mediators are due in the city to try to end the fighting.

The violence has led the European Union to delay sending its planned peacekeeping force to Chad. More than half of this 3,700-strong force will be French.

The force was meant to protect refugees displaced by the conflict in Darfur and aid workers.

The latest rebel offensive began on the day the first troops had been meant to arrive.

Chad has accused Sudan of backing the rebels to stop the peacekeepers getting too close to Darfur. Sudan denies the charges.
 
=






February 05, 2008

CRISIS IN CHAD​


Sarkozy Warns Rebels that France Could Intervene

By Stefan Simons in Paris
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,533299,00.html


Former colonial power France is continuing to evacuate its citizens and other foreigners out of strife-torn Chad. Paris has actively backed the regime in N'Djamena in the past and on Tuesday President Nicolas Sarkozy warned the rebels that France was prepared to "do its duty" and intervene to defend President Deby.


On Tuesdy President Nicolas Sarkozy said that France was prepared to intervene to protect Chad's President Idriss Deby.

Four days after the launch of a rebel offensive in Chad aimed at toppling President Idriss Deby, calm has returned to the capital N'Djamena. The rebels announced they were temporarily pulling back "in order to give the population the opportunity to leave the capital." Following fighting that left dozens of civilians dead thousands of people are continuing to flee into neighboring Cameroon on Tuesday. The French military has been evacuating its own citizens and other Europeans -- the first airplane touched down in Paris on Monday, and on Tuesday French President Nicolas Sarkozy warned that France could intervene to support the Chadian president.

"If Chad was to become a victim to an aggression, France would have -- conditionally -- the means to oppose such an act," French President Nicolas Sarkozy said Tuesday, commenting on the apparent stalemate between government forces and the rebels forces who have withdrawn to the outskirts to the capital of the country in the very heart of Africa. Sarkozys warned the rebels, "France is ready to do its duty."

The French president described the Debry regime as a "legitimate government," which was formed following a decision "at the polls." Despite the fact that human rights groups have repeatedly criticized the oppressive regime and questioned the value of the elections that have taken place since Deby's takeover in 1990, Sarkozy adopted a position of principle: "One does not take power with arms -- in no region of the world."

Sarkozy's new commitment to the acting government underlines the dilemma the French are facing in Chad: On the one hand the former colonial power wants to maintain neutrality, yet it leaves no doubt that it would rather the regime in N'Djamena then accept a takeover by at least three different rebel groups from southern Sudan. "The French army is not there (in Chad) to take up arms against whoever that might be," Sarkozy said, commenting on the third onslaught of rebel forces in recent years, but now France had a legal basis for an eventual intervention since now "there is a legal unanimous decision by the Security Council." The French leader was referring to a non-binding decision of the highest United Nations body on Monday, which "condemned firmly the attacks perpetrated by armed groups against the Chad government."

Cooperation Treaty between France and Chad

However, French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner has stressed that France has no intention of immediately stepping up military operations, especially as the situation seemed calmer on Tuesday. "If you want to make me say that we will go to war against the rebels, I'm telling you, no."

But Timane Erdimi, the leader of one of three rebel groups, still accused France of supporting Chad's President Deby -- who just also happens to be his uncle. The French military presence alone, said Erdimi, "supports one of the most corrupt regimes in the history of Africa."

Paris did indeed at least passively support Deby's putsch in 1990 by telling French troops deployed there not to intervene. Paris long stayed true to the French-trained pilot, even though it soon became clear that Deby's regime engaged in terror and torture. When the former colonial power finally distanced itself from the dictator, he was able to hold onto power with flowing oil revenues. It was only since Deby got involved in the conflict in Darfur at the urging of former allies that his regime has come under pressure from rebel groups based in southern Sudan.

France is sticking strictly to its bilateral agreements during the latest hostilities -- at least that's the official line. And that means providing "logistical help and reconnaissance." Beyond that there are apparently other wide-ranging military treaties. According to the independent French information service Rue89, the defense treaties stemming from when Chad gained independence in 1976 were afterwards replaced by military-technical cooperation agreements. The main difference to the previous commitments is the rules of engagement for French troops: "The French military personnel serve within the armed forces of Chad ... in either uniform or as civilians. They must not under any circumstances be part of war operations, including actions to restore law and order."

The Role of Military advisors

Despite these strict criteria, French soldiers have at least indirectly been involved in the conflicts plaguing Chad -- the last time was in April 2006 when the air force flew over the rebel lines to relay information about their location and strength to government troops. Even if the agreements in the 1970s limited cooperation, the aid and training unit Dami (Détachement d'Assistance Militaire et d'Instructions) effectively provided military reconnaissance and protection for the regime. "Settled at the top of the hierarchy in the armed forces of Chad, the 'Dami' advisors formed a parallel chain of command," reported Rue89. "It allowed France to either leave those in power or to exchange them."

Besides that contingent of military advisors there is supposedly a "secret agreement for maintaining order" in effect allowing France's president to intervene when requested by his African counterpart. "A type of life insurance or guarantee for the regime," commented the experts from Rue89, who first exposed this secret deal in July 2007. That agreement allows the leaders of the countries in question to ask Paris for help "in extremely difficult situations" -- although it's up to France to act or not.

President Sarkozy now faces a dilemma that newspaper Le Figaro has described as "The Chad Trap." Should Paris willingly aid the oppressive regime in N'Djamena? Or fail to do so and risk a further destabilization of the region?
 
=






Chad Government Declares Victory Over Rebels; France Warns it Will Use Force

By Nico Colombant
Dakar
05 February 2008
VOA

Rebel leaders in Chad are giving conflicting statements about a possible cease-fire, while Chad's government is declaring victory after rebels failed to take the capital N'Djamena in last week's fighting. Meanwhile, the president of former colonial power France, Nicolas Sarkozy, has said France is ready to do its duty to defend Chad's government if necessary. VOA's Nico Colombant reports from Dakar.


Speaking in Aytre, France, Mr. Sarkozy told reporters, that no one should doubt that France will do what it needs to do to defend the government of Chad's President Idriss Deby.

He said if Chad is the victim of aggression, France has the means to oppose such action, following a U.N. Security Council statement on Chad passed late Monday.


French ambassador to the United Nations, Jean-Maurice Ripert, explained the non-binding resolution calls on member states to support Chad's government.

One rebel leader, Abderahmane Koulamallah, told French media that the rebels decided to accept a cease-fire, based on humanitarian considerations, following mediation by the leaders of Libya, Burkina Faso and the Republic of Congo.

The cease-fire is accepted, he said, on the basis of a future national dialogue on establishing democracy in Chad.

Chad's President Idriss Deby took power in a coup in 1990, and has since changed the constitution to allow unlimited terms. His last election victory in 2006 was widely viewed as fraudulent.

But another rebel leader quoted by the Reuters news agency says rebels will only agree to a cease-fire if Mr. Deby steps down. Rebels have also accused French forces permanently based in Chad of already backing Chad's government militarily.

French officials say their soldiers have evacuated foreigners, and also given logistical, medical and intelligence help to Chad's army, but have not engaged in direct combat.

Chad's Prime Minister Nourredine Kassire Coumakoye said on French television there is no reason to have a cease-fire with what he called dead people.

He said those rebels who were not dead, are fleeing.

Residents who remained in N'Djamena said there are dozens of dead bodies lying on the streets. The International Committee of the Red Cross estimates at least 1,000 people were injured during last week's battles, which also caused a mass exodus from the city.

Meanwhile, human rights activists, both local and foreign, say major opposition leaders were arrested or had their houses attacked.

Reed Brody is a spokesman for New-York based Human Rights Watch.

"We are worried as well for the human rights organizations," he said. "It is surprising that the Chadian government is using this fighting as apparently a pretext to settle some scores with the unarmed opposition."

Opposition leaders say they have nothing to do with the rebels. Chad's government also accuses Sudan of backing the rebels, a charge Sudanese officials deny, even though the rebels have their bases on Sudanese territory.

Chadian rebels accused rebels from Darfur of having helped defend Mr. Deby's presidential palace during the fiercest fighting on Saturday and Sunday.

The rebels withdrew from the Chadian capital earlier this week, but had said they plan to launch another assault.
 
Top