Comet Dust Resembles Asteroid Materials

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
https://publicaffairs.llnl.gov/news/news_releases/2008/NR-08-01-05.html
(fair use applies)
Stardust comet dust resembles asteroid materials
January 24, 2008

LIVERMORE, Calif. – Contrary to expectations for a small icy body, much of the comet dust returned by the Stardust mission formed very close to the young sun and was altered from the solar system’s early materials.

When the Stardust mission returned to Earth with samples from the comet Wild 2 in 2006, scientists knew the material would provide new clues about the formation of our solar system, but they didn’t know exactly how.

New research by scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and collaborators reveals that, in addition to containing material that formed very close to the young sun, the dust from Wild 2 also is missing ingredients that would be expected in comet dust. Surprisingly, the Wild 2 comet sample better resembles a meteorite from the asteroid belt rather than an ancient, unaltered comet.

Comets are expected to contain large amounts of the most primitive material in the solar system, a treasure trove of stardust from other stars and other ancient materials. But in the case of Wild 2, that simply is not the case.

By comparing the Stardust samples to cometary interplanetary dust particles (CP IDPs), the team found that two silicate materials normally found in cometary IDPs, together with other primitive materials including presolar stardust grains from other stars, have not been found in the abundances that might be expected in a Kuiper Belt comet like Wild 2. The high-speed capture of the Stardust particles may be partly responsible; but extra refractory components that formed in the inner solar nebula within a few astronomical units of the sun, indicate that the Stardust material resembles chondritic meteorites from the asteroid belt.

“The material is a lot less primitive and more altered than materials we have gathered through high altitude capture in our own stratosphere from a variety of comets,” said LLNL’s Hope Ishii, lead author of the research that appears in the Jan. 25 edition of the journal, Science. “As a whole, the samples look more asteroidal than cometary.”

Because of its tail formed by vaporizing ices, Wild 2 is, by definition, a comet. “It’s a reminder that we can’t make black and white distinctions between asteroids and comets,” Ishii said. “There is a continuum between them.”

The surprising findings contradict researchers’ initial expectations for a comet that spent most of its life orbiting in the Kuiper Belt, beyond Neptune. In 1974, Wild 2 had a close encounter with Jupiter that placed it into its current orbit much closer to Earth.

Comets formed beyond the so-called frost line where water and other volatiles existed as ices. Because of their setting far from the sun, they have been viewed as a virtual freezer, preserving the original preliminary ingredients of the solar system’s formation 4.6 billion years ago. The Stardust spacecraft traveled a total of seven years to reach Wild 2 and returned to Earth in January 2006 with a cargo of tiny particles for scientist to analyze.

This is one of the first studies to closely compare Stardust particles to CP IDPs. This class of IDPs is believed to contain the most primitive and unaltered fraction of the primordial material from which our planets and other solar system objects formed. They are highly enriched in isotopically anomalous organic and inorganic outer solar nebula materials inherited – through the presolar molecular cloud – from dust produced around other stars. IDPs are gathered in the stratosphere by high altitude airplanes (ER-2s and WB-57s) that are typically more than 50 years old.

The Livermore team specifically searched for two silicate materials in Stardust that are believed to be unique to cometary IDPs: amorphous silicates known as GEMS (glass with embedded metal and sulfides); and sliver-like whiskers of the crystalline silicate enstatite (a rock-forming mineral). Surprisingly, the team found only a single enstatite whisker in the Stardust samples, and it had the wrong crystallographic orientation – a form typical of terrestrial and asteroidal enstatite.

Objects similar to GEMS were found, but Ishii and the team showed they were actually created during the high speed 6-kilometer per second impact of Wild 2 comet dust with the Stardust spacecraft’s collector by making similar material in the laboratory.

In analyzing the Stardust material, Ishii’s team used Livermore’s SuperSTEM (scanning transmission electron microscope). Ishii said future analyses should focus on larger-grained materials, so-called micro-rocks, which suffered less alteration.

“The material found in primitive objects just wasn’t there in the samples,” said John Bradley, another LLNL author. “I think this is science in action. It’s really exciting because it’s just not what we expected.”

“Wild 2 doesn’t look like what we thought all comets should look like,” Ishii said. “The Stardust mission was a real success because without it, we would never have learned these things about our solar system. The sample return was vital for us to continue to unravel how our solar system formed and evolved.”

In addition to Ishii and Bradley, other LLNL researchers include Zu Rong Dai, Miaofang Chi and Nigel Browning. Other institutions involved include UC Davis, the Natural History Museum of London, the University of Kent and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO).

Stardust is a part of NASA’s series of Discovery missions and is managed by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Stardust launched in February 1999 and set off on three giant loops around the sun. It began collecting interstellar dust in 2000 and met Wild 2 in January 2004, when the spacecraft was slammed by thousands of comet particles including some the size of BBs that could have compromised the mission. It is the first spacecraft to safely make it back to Earth with cometary dust particles in tow.

Founded in 1952, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has a mission to ensure national security and to apply science and technology to the important issues of our time. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is managed by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
MORE ARTICLES:


http://www.latimes.com/news/science/la-sci-stardust25jan25,0,9375.story
(fair use applies)

NASA's Stardust upends comet theory
A new analysis of materials collected by the 2004 space mission suggests that comets and asteroids are more similar than scientists had believed.
By John Johnson Jr., Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
January 25, 2008

New research is challenging the long-held position that comets and asteroids are as different as lions and lemurs.

The latest analysis of material from comet 81P/Wild 2 suggests that some comets are very asteroidlike and, presumably, vice versa.

"This is a wake-up call that small bodies in the solar system don't necessarily come in two flavors," said researcher Hope Ishii, a physicist at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. "Instead, it's more of a continuum."

The new research, published in today's issue of the journal Science, contains the latest results from NASA's Stardust spacecraft, which flew through the tail of the comet and landed in the Utah desert in 2004.

Stardust, managed by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in La Cañada Flintridge, was the first spacecraft to return to Earth carrying comet dust.

Its initial results, released in late 2006, showed what scientists at the time called a "zoo" of materials, some of which came from the inner solar system where asteroids originated. As research into the comet dust samples has continued, Ishii said, a picture is emerging of a body that not only looks asteroidlike but is missing markers from the outer solar system, the home of most comets.

"We went to a comet, got a sample and brought it home," said University of Washington astronomer Donald Brownlee, a principal investigator on the Stardust mission.

"We all expected the picture that emerged to be simple. It's not."

Conventional scientific theory has long held that asteroids were cooked by the sun's heat before winding up in the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter. Comets, it was thought, were never cooked at all. Instead, they were thought to contain the most primitive material in the solar system: dust from other stars and other ancient material, as well as the ice and gas that give comets their tails when their orbits take them close to the sun.

This assumption was bolstered by decades of studies of comet dust captured by high-altitude balloons and aircraft.

Wild 2 tells a different story. Among the compounds scooped up by Stardust are calcium aluminum inclusions. These are produced by some of the highest-heating processes in the solar system, Ishii said.

Meanwhile, the research team found that two primitive materials normally found in interplanetary dust particles -- glass with embedded metals, and sliverlike rock-forming minerals -- have not been found in the expected quantities.

"The material is a lot less primitive and more altered than materials we have gathered through high-altitude capture in our own stratosphere from a variety of comets," Ishii said.

One possibility, Ishii said, is that the capture process destroyed some of the evidence. When the spacecraft flew through the comet's tail, its racket-shaped capture grid was slammed by thousands of particles, some the size of BBs.

But that doesn't explain why material only from the inner solar system would survive.

There is no doubt that Wild 2 is a comet. It spent much of its existence beyond the so-called frost line of the asteroid belt, where water survives as ice, Ishii said. In 1974, it passed close enough to Jupiter that its orbit was altered, sending it closer to Earth.

The capture itself was a delicate maneuver. After its 1999 launch, Stardust made three giant loops around the sun before flying through the comet's tail in January 2004.

The question raised by the new results is what mechanism would transport some small bodies into the asteroid belt while others are kicked all the way out to the Kuiper Belt beyond Neptune.

One theory, Brownlee said, is that the magnetic force of the sun acts as a slingshot.

In analyzing the Stardust material, Ishii's team used Livermore's SuperSTEM, a scanning transmission electron microscope.

John P. Bradley, a coauthor with Ishii of the new research, said he wasn't disappointed by the results.

"I think this is science in action," he said. "It's really exciting because it's just not what we expected."

http://space.newscientist.com/artic...ly-asteroidlike.html?feedId=online-news_rss20
(fair use applies)

Comet samples are surprisingly asteroid-like
20:28 24 January 2008
NewScientist.com news service
David Shiga


Samples of Comet Wild 2 suggest it is made of rocky material, like an asteroid, rather than the fluffy dust expected of a comet. The object may be a refugee that formed in the asteroid belt before getting kicked to the chilly fringes of the solar system, or it might have formed in that frigid realm from material thrown out of the inner solar system, scientists say.

NASA's Stardust mission swung by comet Wild 2 in 2004 to capture particles shed by the 5-kilometre object and returned them to Earth in 2006. Since then, scientists have been carefully analysing the microscopic fragments it collected.

Early on, scientists found surprising evidence that Wild 2 contained some material from the inner solar system that had been heated to more than 1000° C due to its proximity to the Sun.

Now, scientists have been surprised again as further study suggests Wild 2 is made mostly of material from the inner solar system, and that the object has a composition more like that of an asteroid than what was expected of a comet. The conclusion comes from a study led by Hope Ishii of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) in Livermore, California, US.

The team compared particles from Wild 2 with dust grains collected by experiments in Earth's upper atmosphere, whose trajectories suggest they come from comets.

The atmospheric particles are largely made of fluffy, silicon-based clumps called GEMS (glass with embedded metal and sulphides). GEMS had previously been reported in the Wild 2 sample, but Ishii's team suggests these were instead created by the high-speed impact of dust particles with Stardust's collectors.
Swept out

The collectors are pieces of a lightweight, silicon-based material called an aerogel. The team's experiments show that GEMS-like clumps can be produced when other kinds of particles hit the aerogel at high speed, as they did in the Stardust collection process, and partially melt it as a result. Bolstering this idea is the fact that the Stardust GEMS have a different chemical signature from the GEMS in comet dust collected in Earth's atmosphere.

The team also points out that minerals that contain carbon are rare in the sample, but abundant in atmospheric dust thought to come from comets. Rocky meteorites thought to come from asteroids called chondrites, however, have small amounts of carbon.

It was expected that the comet would contain pristine material - in the form of GEMS, for example - from the cloud of gas and dust that formed the solar system about 4.5 billion years ago, since the comet would have been unaltered by heat so far from the Sun. But this study, along with previous measurements of atomic isotopes in the Stardust samples, suggests the comet is not a good probe of this primitive material.

Stardust chief scientist Don Brownlee of the University of Washington in Seattle, US, who was not involved in the study, says he agrees with its main conclusion. "Probably most of the mass of the comet is actually inner solar system material that was carried out from the inner solar system to the outside," he told New Scientist.

But he says one cannot draw firm conclusions about GEMS. Those structures could have been present in the Wild 2 material, he explains, but destroyed or modified by the collection process.
'Asteroid-like comet'

The picture that emerges is that Wild 2 appears to be "kind of an asteroid-like comet", Ishii told New Scientist. Wild 2 may have formed in the outer solar system from material that had drifted there from the inner solar system, she says. Alternatively, the object itself could have formed closer to the Sun and then migrated outwards later, she says.

Wild 2 should still be considered a comet, she adds, because it is throwing off gas and dust as ice on its surface evaporates in sunlight. But she says the new findings bolster the view that there is no sharp dividing line between comets and asteroids. "This is a good indication that there is a continuum between asteroids and comets," she says.

Some objects in the outer asteroid belt have been dubbed 'outer belt comets', because they contain a lot of ice that sometimes produces tails when it evaporates in the Sun's heat. And some objects in the outer solar system beyond Neptune appear to be rocky in composition, like asteroids, says co-author John Bradley, also of Lawrence Livermore.

Journal reference: Science (DOI: 10.1126/science.1150683)



Links to other articles discussing this:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080124161617.htm

http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Stardust_Comet_Dust_Resembles_Asteroid_Materials_999.html

http://www.sciam.com/podcast/episode.cfm?id=ADD0878B-D6C3-3B70-7B5BC373545BB82D
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
This study adds a lot of weight to Jim McCanney's theories. (I'm sure some will say it it confirms them, but I'll just say it adds weight since it doesn't necessarily rule out other theories besides McCanney's ;) )

If you want to read a summary I did of McCanney's theory of the electric universe as it applied to Comet Holmes (but it was an explanation of the theory in general as well) to see how this study adds weight to it - you can read it at this post:

http://www.timebomb2000.com/vb/showpost.php?p=2622626&postcount=513

HD
 

gdpetti

Inactive
Another good example of the simple fact that the more we learn, the less we know..... as both grow larger the more we pay attention to them... variables endlessly increasing in depth and breadth.... an equation that never stops still and is forever expanding like the universe is said to be doing. Just thinking that we have a good idea of what's going on around us is a case of 'wishful thinking'.

Some say that asteroid belt was once a planet... and how much do we really know about the Oort Cloud that surrounds our system? And how about that ancient comet our forefathers called Venus and its 'war' with Mars? Perhaps those reports weren't so far off? Perhaps we can expect a new version of 'fire in the sky'? It seems science is just starting to catch up with those mystical explanations of our universe... and McCanney is one of them.... as our limited visual perception learns to expand to include ever more of the spectrum of light... EM energy and its gravitational base.
 

Rattlehead

did someone say BBQ?
Ah...

So they could truly be chuncks of 'Tiamat' :)

Now who do I know that predicted this decades ago...
 
Top