'US ready to strike Iran on Good Friday'

Status
Not open for further replies.

JohnGaltfla

#NeverTrump
'US ready to strike Iran on Good Friday'

NOTE THE SOURCE!!!!! THEY WOULD KNOW-jg
:siren: :bkg: :siren: :bkg: :siren: :bkg:

Apr. 1, 2007 1:00 | Updated Apr. 1, 2007 3:29

Jerusalem Post staff and AP, THE JERUSALEM POST Apr. 1, 2007

The United States will be ready to launch a missile attack on Iran's nuclear facilities as soon as early this month, perhaps "from 4 a.m. until 4 p.m. on April 6," according to reports in the Russian media on Saturday.

According to Russian intelligence sources, the reports said, the US has devised a plan to attack several targets in Iran, and an assault could be carried out by launching missiles from fighter jets and warships stationed in the Persian Gulf.

Russian news agency RIA Novosti quoted a security official as saying, "Russian intelligence has information that the US Armed Forces stationed in the Persian Gulf have nearly completed preparations for a missile strike against Iranian territory."

The Russian Defense Ministry rejected the claims of an imminent attack as "myths." There was no immediate response from Washington.

The reports come as the Iranian chief of staff, Hassan Fayrouz Abadi, was quoted on Saturday by Iran's Fars news agency warning leaders of Arab countries that Israel plans to open a "suicidal attack" on its neighbors this summer, to "prevent the withdrawal of the US troops from Iraq and the area."

"I warn the dear leaders and Muslim brothers in the neighboring countries of the occupied territories that this suicidal attack of the Zionists is threatening them," he said.

The countries in danger, he said, were "Lebanon and Syria, and later Egypt, Jordan and Saudi Arabia."

Also on Saturday, Russia urged Britain and Teheran to resolve the dispute over 15 British sailors and marines captured by Iran last week, a local news agency reported.

Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Mikhail Kamynin urged the two sides to provide the United Nations with their own assessments as to what happened and where exactly the detention occurred so that the body could conduct an independent probe.

"We hope these actions will provide a foundation for the soonest possible resolution of the crisis," Kamynin was quoted as saying by the Interfax news agency.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad insisted that the captured British sailors and marines trespassed in Iranian waters and called world powers "arrogant" for failing to apologize, the country's official news agency reported.

"The British occupier forces did trespass our waters. Our border guards detained them with skill and bravery. But arrogant powers, because of their arrogant and selfish spirit, are claiming otherwise," IRNA quoted Ahmadinejad as saying during a speech in the southeastern city of Andinmeshk.

The European Union grappled with a double bind over Iran Saturday - the country's nuclear program and its seizure of the British troops - and reported no progress on either issue.

A debate about Iran's nuclear ambitions had been scheduled as a key agenda item but "was overshadowed to a certain extent by the issue of the sailors and marines," German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier said after hosting a two-day EU foreign ministers meeting in Bremen, Germany.

The Foreign Ministry in Iran dismissed the EU's "biased and meddlesome" comments on the captured troops, saying the dispute solely involved the governments of Iran and Britain.

Speaking to reporters in Bremen, British Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett urged Iran to resolve the crisis over the military personnel peacefully, saying London remains open to dialogue.

"We encourage Iran to peacefully resolve this issue," she said.

"We continue to express our willingness to engage in dialogue and discussions with Iran," she added. "That is very much in the best interest of our people and that is our foremost concern."

"I think everyone regrets that this position has arisen," she said. "What we want is a way out of it."

AP contributed to this report.
 

h_oder

Veteran Member
SOB - DH and I are supposed to leave on a vac Easter Sunday, with both DD's staying with their grandparents! Time to check the "travel insurance" to see about "WAR" - probably get screwed....
 

JohnGaltfla

#NeverTrump
SOB - DH and I are supposed to leave on a vac Easter Sunday, with both DD's staying with their grandparents! Time to check the "travel insurance" to see about "WAR" - probably get screwed....

Welcome to the club. I'm scheduled to travel the state that week on business. Not cool, not cool at all......
 

night driver

ESFP adrift in INTJ sea
John that source is also one of the best sources of DISINFORMATION in the world.....this is just more of the RIA NOVOSTI story. It all tracks back to that story....
 

LoupGarou

Ancient Fuzzball
It does seem that they are quoting the same russian intel magazine source that everybody else is right now. While I do feel that things are getting ready for a strike, my gut feeling says that it will be later, by at least a week or two. While it could happen on the 6th, I am wondering if this is not a "push" to see if somebody can make somebody "blink".

Loup
 

JohnGaltfla

#NeverTrump
John that source is also one of the best sources of DISINFORMATION in the world.....this is just more of the RIA NOVOSTI story. It all tracks back to that story....

Tie that in with the Bloomberg story on Bahrain via Debka last week and it does make sense.....
 

Cabal

Pissed off Patriot
If we attack Iran, it could come at anytime...

you don't need a moonless night to attack anyone with cruise missles and bombs...

The boots on the ground work better with IR, but a missle doesn't care...
 

skip1

Membership Revoked
Thinking Outside Of The Box

'US ready to strike Iran on Good Friday'

NOTE THE SOURCE!!!!! THEY WOULD KNOW-jg
:siren: :bkg: :siren: :bkg: :siren: :bkg:

Apr. 1, 2007 1:00 | Updated Apr. 1, 2007 3:29

Jerusalem Post staff and AP, THE JERUSALEM POST Apr. 1, 2007

The United States will be ready to launch a missile attack on Iran's nuclear facilities as soon as early this month, perhaps "from 4 a.m. until 4 p.m. on April 6," according to reports in the Russian media on Saturday.

According to Russian intelligence sources, the reports said, the US has devised a plan to attack several targets in Iran, and an assault could be carried out by launching missiles from fighter jets and warships stationed in the Persian Gulf.

Russian news agency RIA Novosti quoted a security official as saying, "Russian intelligence has information that the US Armed Forces stationed in the Persian Gulf have nearly completed preparations for a missile strike against Iranian territory."

The Russian Defense Ministry rejected the claims of an imminent attack as "myths." There was no immediate response from Washington.

The reports come as the Iranian chief of staff, Hassan Fayrouz Abadi, was quoted on Saturday by Iran's Fars news agency warning leaders of Arab countries that Israel plans to open a "suicidal attack" on its neighbors this summer, to "prevent the withdrawal of the US troops from Iraq and the area."

"I warn the dear leaders and Muslim brothers in the neighboring countries of the occupied territories that this suicidal attack of the Zionists is threatening them," he said.

The countries in danger, he said, were "Lebanon and Syria, and later Egypt, Jordan and Saudi Arabia."

Also on Saturday, Russia urged Britain and Teheran to resolve the dispute over 15 British sailors and marines captured by Iran last week, a local news agency reported.

Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Mikhail Kamynin urged the two sides to provide the United Nations with their own assessments as to what happened and where exactly the detention occurred so that the body could conduct an independent probe.

"We hope these actions will provide a foundation for the soonest possible resolution of the crisis," Kamynin was quoted as saying by the Interfax news agency.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad insisted that the captured British sailors and marines trespassed in Iranian waters and called world powers "arrogant" for failing to apologize, the country's official news agency reported.

"The British occupier forces did trespass our waters. Our border guards detained them with skill and bravery. But arrogant powers, because of their arrogant and selfish spirit, are claiming otherwise," IRNA quoted Ahmadinejad as saying during a speech in the southeastern city of Andinmeshk.

The European Union grappled with a double bind over Iran Saturday - the country's nuclear program and its seizure of the British troops - and reported no progress on either issue.

A debate about Iran's nuclear ambitions had been scheduled as a key agenda item but "was overshadowed to a certain extent by the issue of the sailors and marines," German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier said after hosting a two-day EU foreign ministers meeting in Bremen, Germany.

The Foreign Ministry in Iran dismissed the EU's "biased and meddlesome" comments on the captured troops, saying the dispute solely involved the governments of Iran and Britain.

Speaking to reporters in Bremen, British Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett urged Iran to resolve the crisis over the military personnel peacefully, saying London remains open to dialogue.

"We encourage Iran to peacefully resolve this issue," she said.

"We continue to express our willingness to engage in dialogue and discussions with Iran," she added. "That is very much in the best interest of our people and that is our foremost concern."

"I think everyone regrets that this position has arisen," she said. "What we want is a way out of it."

AP contributed to this report.



Religious PSYOP with the Mullahs, I like it.
 

JohnGaltfla

#NeverTrump
But since they WANT Armageddon to happen, it would probably be more of an attempt for a self fulfilling prophecy to happen.

Loup

My larger concern Loup is that this could be a psyop and the Iranians respond by damaging or sinking the Stennis with a massive barrage of their high speed torpedos and cruise missiles.

The Iranians and other nutjobs (like Hezbollah against Israel last year) learned the lesson from the Serbians:

Hide it all very very well or use them or lose them.

The Iranian whackjobs I feel will use them.
 

Dredge

Inactive
In five years this regime may be long gone and a more agreeable goverment running things. The Russians had thousands of nukes aimed at us and never a problem. Seems the retoric is is running the show when cooler heads need to be in charge. Kill,kill,kill, die,die,die, we must kill now or we may not get the chance to kill.
 

night driver

ESFP adrift in INTJ sea
Remember John, the BEST Dizinformazion has a lot of truth included.....and USUALLY makes a LOT of sense.

YES things are keying up.

Next Friday??? I dunno.
 

night driver

ESFP adrift in INTJ sea
Dredge, the Russians were reasonable men by Western Standards.... they never threatened to wipe us off the map, only bury us, once.

the Mulahs aer different men entirely so the Russian Analogy fails.
 

JohnGaltfla

#NeverTrump
Dredge, the Russians were reasonable men by Western Standards.... they never threatened to wipe us off the map, only bury us, once.

the Mulahs aer different men entirely so the Russian Analogy fails.

Spot on. The Mullahs are suicidal because they know if they die and 30,000,000 Iranians die, then 1.1 billion Muslims will rise up against us.

A fair trade in their method of warfare.
 

CanadianGuy

Veteran Member
looking at the timeframe, it says in the article from 4 am to 4pm april 6th obviously that would be Jeruselem Time. so that would probably be 7 pm our time EDT April 5 th.?
 

JohnGaltfla

#NeverTrump
looking at the timeframe, it says in the article from 4 am to 4pm april 6th obviously that would be Jeruselem Time. so that would probably be 7 pm our time EDT April 5 th.?

Probably a Friday night local time strike. Let our boys have morning services then turn and burn.

B-2's are the exception as they would leave Thursday morning for D.G. unless they were carrying tacticals in which case they would not stop except to refuel.
 

Glowy SC

Senior Member
Just thinking. What if Russia says all this about USA is going to attack. Iran goes ahead and either attacks Isreal or our troops in Iraq. They really want war. They can't complete their fate without it. Russia says opps, bad intel. This sounds like it could happen but this won't fulfil what the Bible says will happen. Very interesting times.
 

JohnGaltfla

#NeverTrump
Just thinking. What if Russia says all this about USA is going to attack. Iran goes ahead and either attacks Isreal or our troops in Iraq. They really want war. They can't complete their fate without it. Russia says opps, bad intel. This sounds like it could happen but this won't fulfil what the Bible says will happen. Very interesting times.

For Russia, as well documented here and elsewhere, a war with the US and Iran is a win-win.

They get an increase in oil prices.

They get more business.

They get to sell more weapons.

They get to continue to kill their own Muslims to keep the peace while the world condemns us for attacking Iran.

Win-Win from their perspective in every way.
 

skip1

Membership Revoked
Mullahs Are In For A Big Surprise

Guy here is the deal Mullahs want war because they believe it will be limited to a bombing campaign of maybe 100 sites. Then Iran will use asymmetrical warfare throughout Iraq & Middle East to drive us out because they believe that deep down American leaders has lost their fighting spirit. Well if Kerry or Pelosi were President they would be dead on target. However, they are dealing with Bush. He knows what NEEDS be done. Why do you think he is amassing the greatest invasion Armanda since D-Day surrounding IRAN???? I don’t think it’s just to bomb a few hundred sites in Iran. You guys know the answer & what's COMING
jennifer_eccleston_miss_shock_and_awe.jpg
to IRAN REAL SOON. Yup MISS SHOCK & AWE HERSELF.
 

Wil

Inactive
DEBKAfile Exclusive: US financial sources in Bahrain report American investors in Bahrain advised to pack up business operations and leave

March 30, 2007, 10:53 PM (GMT+02:00)
USS Nimitz nuclear carrier



The advice came from officers with US Central Command 5th Fleet HQ at Manama, who spoke of security tension, a hint at an approaching war with Iran. Arab sources report the positioning of a Patriot anti-missile battery in Bahrain this week; they say occupancy at emirate hotels has soared past 90% due mostly to the influx of US military personnel. They also report Western media crews normally employed in military coverage are arriving in packs.

Thursday, March 29, Gen. Khaled al-‘Absi, Bahrain’s chief of air defense operations disclosed that new alarm networks had been installed and air defense systems upgraded to handle chemical, biological and radioactive attacks.

The USS Nimitz and its support ships will be departing San Diego Monday, April 2, to join the John C. Stennis Strike Group in the Persian Gulf. The nuclear carrier is due to relieve the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower , but military sources in the Gulf believe all three US carriers will stay put if tensions continue to climb or if fighting breaks out involving American, British and Iranian forces.

The mighty American armada is further supported by the USS Bataan and USS Boxer strike groups.

War tensions have been triggered most recently by the crisis over the seized British sailors and large-scale US sea, air and amphibious exercises in the Gulf.

1. DEBKAfile’s Tehran sources report that in the contest within the Iranian leadership over how to handle the affair of the captured British seamen, the wildest radical element has gained the upper hand, reducing the prospects of their imminent release. Heading the tough Tehran faction are hardline president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Gen. Rahim Safavi, commander of the Revolutionary Guards whose naval wing performed the seizure.

They gained strength from the British premier Tony Blair’s initial passive, semi-conciliatory response. Tehran quickly grasped it had acquired not just a propaganda tool but a military asset, which the UK cannot match as long as the Americans desist from throwing their military might into the fray. Washington has refused to risk of a full-scale war confrontation with the Revolutionary Guards for the sake of the British sailors.

Iranian strategists also registered that, although the Blair government has begun moving mountains to gain the freedom of the marine crew held in Tehran, London appeared fairly laid back about the kidnap of BBC correspondent Alan Johnston in broad daylight by gunmen in Palestinian Gaza, although three weeks had gone by.

Revolutionary Guards serving with Palestinian terrorist groups in Gaza no doubt filed a full report on the Johnston case to Tehran, which drew its own conclusions.

2. Taking part in the big demonstration of American naval, air and marine force launched March 27 are the two nuclear carrier strike forces Stennis and Eisenhower , thousands of marines and 100 warplanes. Maneuvers on this scale in the tight, overcrowded waters of the Persian Gulf carry risks of a collision between American and Iranian craft.

DEBKAfile’s military sources report that the Nimitz group is composed of the Princeton guided-missile cruiser, four guided missile destroyers – the Higgins , Chafee , John Paul Jones and Pinckney . The strike force is armed with two helicopter squadrons and a special unit for dismantling sea mines and other explosive devices.

Earlier, DEBKAfile quoted intelligence sources in Moscow as predicting that a US strike against Iranian nuclear installations codenamed Operation Bite has been scheduled for April 6 at 0040 hours. Missiles and air raids will conduct strikes designed to be devastating enough to set Tehran’s nuclear program several years back.

http://www.debka.com/
 

Caplock50

I am the Winter Warrior
And what if April 6 comes and goes...and nothing happens? Will everybody heave a huge sigh of relief and relax? And in relaxing; let their guard down? Which, then, would leave them open for the real attack? On, say, around the 15th? As per my timeline? And that of the new moon? In other words...could this April 6th BS be nothing more than a feint?
 

CanadianGuy

Veteran Member
And what if April 6 comes and goes...and nothing happens? Will everybody heave a huge sigh of relief and relax? And in relaxing; let their guard down? Which, then, would leave them open for the real attack? On, say, around the 15th? As per my timeline? And that of the new moon? In other words...could this April 6th BS be nothing more than a feint?

Can I ask why you consider the 15th? i s this something you can share?
 

sirlancelot

Inactive
If the [FONT=Verdana,Arial]USS Nimitz [/FONT][FONT=Verdana,Arial]is departing for the Persian Gulf on the 2nd of April how long will it take for it to reach its destination to replace the Eisenhower?[/FONT][FONT=Verdana,Arial]
[/FONT]
 

dcamp2002

Inactive
U.S. Carrier Nimitz to Deploy to Persian Gulf

AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE, WASHINGTON
Posted 03/30/07 12:09

http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?F=2662256&C=america

Nuclear-powered aircraft carrier USS Nimitz will sail April 2 to support U.S. operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, the U.S. Navy said, amid a spike in tensions over Iran’s seizure of 15 British marines and sailors.

The Nimitz, and its battle group of destroyers and guided-missile cruisers, will relieve the carrier Dwight D. Eisenhower, which this week took part in war games exercises in the Gulf with another carrier, John C. Stennis.

The new battle group will be in position by late April
, but there will be no overlap with the Eisenhower, and the number of U.S. carriers in the area would stay at two, a navy official said on condition of anonymity.

"If anything, there would be a point where there is only one in the region," the official said, on condition of anonymity.

The Stennis and the Eisenhower wound down their show of force involving 15 warships in the Gulf on March 29.

The two-carrier deployment in the Gulf was the highest level of U.S. naval presence in the gulf since the U.S. invasion of Iraq in March 2003.

The Nimitz will support operations in Iraq, the Horn of Africa and Afghanistan, the Navy said in a press release.

The Stennis had been operating in the Indian Ocean and the Arabian Sea but entered Gulf waters March 27, escorted by the guided-missile cruiser Antietam, the 5th Fleet said.
 

Solaris

Inactive
Echo of Moscow Radio: US plans attack against Iran on April 6 at 00:40 a.m.



31 March 2007 | 16:49 | FOCUS News Agency



Moscow. USA plans to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities on April 6 at 00:40 a.m., the Echo of Moscow Radio reports citing anonymous sources from the Russian military intelligence. Financial analysts predicted that the exchange rate of the US dollar and the euro would fall. Badri Gobechiya, CEO of Otkritie Financial Corporation said that a rise in the oil prices would first affect the EU and then the USA.
In an interview with the radio, Gobechiya said: “The Americans won’t start a new war, their analysts won’t allow such a folly”.

http://www.focus-fen.net/index.php?id=n109122
 

housemouse

Membership Revoked
Just did a check on what's going on in the heavens...

A grand cross is active on the fifth of April. It involves the ongoing Saturn/Neptune oppostion with the Moon and Venus squaring the ends of the former..

Am wise enough in the ways of our Lord not to speculate on what this might mean, but it seems sensible that we all are picking up on the building conflict and sense the tension around the coming weekend.

Not happy about it here, but not ready to head for the hills, either.

Hoping it is just the pet food contamination coming to a head, which is bad enough for those who have pets fed the manufactured food, perhaps coming to some sort of irreconcilable "mexican standoff"?

But, as I said before, I do not predict, am not a prophet, etc... All I know is that there will be a grand cross forming on April 5th, involving the planets/lights mentioned above. We could also watch bird flu, Anna Nicole, etc...

Let's just see what happens that day...
 
Last edited:

JohnGaltfla

#NeverTrump
Just did a check on what's going on in the heavens...

A grand cross is active on the fifth of April. It involves the ongoing Saturn/Neptune oppostion with the Moon and Venus squaring the ends of the former..

Am wise enough in the ways of our Lord not to speculate on what this might mean, but it seems sensible that we all are picking up on the building conflict and sense the tension around the coming weekend.

Not happy about it here, but not ready to head for the hills, either.

Hoping it is just the pet food contamination coming to a head, which is bad enough for those who have pets fed the manufactured food, perhaps coming to some sort of irreconcilable "mexican standoff"?

But, as I said before, I do not predict, am not a prophet, etc... All I know is that there will be a grand cross forming on April 5th, involving the planets/lights mentioned above. We could also watch bird flu, Anna Nicole, etc...

Let's just see what happens that day...

Trust me house, I'm no prophet either. But the cost of maintaining the level of manpower in the region is huge on a daily basis. We just don't pile that many assets in there unless something is about to happen.

Plus the fact that many on this board reported, speculated, etc. that the March-April period would be it.

It all fits.

Because we don't want the IAF to do it. They would use tactical nukes.
 

skip8

Inactive
New Moon

And what if April 6 comes and goes...and nothing happens? Will everybody heave a huge sigh of relief and relax? And in relaxing; let their guard down? Which, then, would leave them open for the real attack? On, say, around the 15th? As per my timeline? And that of the new moon? In other words...could this April 6th BS be nothing more than a feint?

Cappy,

I think your spot on.

I continue to believe that if we are putting manned air assets up, even stealth aircraft, as much dark as possible is desired. New moon for April is 4/17.

:wvflg:
 

Hfcomms

EN66iq
I will be very greatful if nothing pops for a few more weeks and I also pay heed to the fact that the first week in April might be disinfo. I still maintain that something nasty has to happen in order for the populace to support an attack on Iran. I don't think the situation with the brit's is currently enough to justify going to war over. There is so much debate going on here that it will take something pretty massive to sell the war to the population as a whole.
 

DaveT

Membership Revoked
In my opinion Iran would have to attack US forces in a very substantional manner prior to any US attack. The public is not with the President on this one.... at least not yet!
 

Mo Magic

Inactive
In my opinion Iran would have to attack US forces in a very substantional manner prior to any US attack. The public is not with the President on this one.... at least not yet!

I agree, but should we do nothing while Iran is building its nuclear arsenal? Then when they have a few extra bombs they can sell them to AQ or bomb Israel.
Something has to be done with Iran!
 

DaveT

Membership Revoked
I agree, but should we do nothing while Iran is building its nuclear arsenal? Then when they have a few extra bombs they can sell them to AQ or bomb Israel.
Something has to be done with Iran!

Iran said that they were not building a bomb. They have done nothing illegal. They have the right to pursue nuclear technology. They signed the treaty. I see hypocrisy. Israel did not sign yet they have nukes.
 

Desperado

Membership Revoked
This has been all over the Internet now for at least 2 weeks.
Im amazed that so many here are salivating at the thought.
I guess its works out well for you. Being Christians and all
you will already be at church for Good Friday Services when this
Christian country attacks those barbarian muslims so you will not
have to make an extra trip.
Not one bit of outrage that the US could attack on Good Friday?
Doesn't this bother any of you "Christians"? Ironic isn't it.
Hate to burst you bubble for a Great Easter Weekend but
I think the only thing you'll be watching this coming Sunday
is the Easter Parade from Disney World.
 

FREEBIRD

Has No Life - Lives on TB
"Let our boys have morning services then turn and burn."

Am I the only person here that sees something wrong with this? What would Jesus do?

Desperado---You and I posted at practically the same time. I have a huge problem with this, especially on Good Friday.
 

Infoscout

The Dude Abides
whether or not you approve of US forces begining a bombing campaign on easter sunday, or any sunday for that matter, don't forget that the Islamofacists who are barbarians by any stretch of imagination would and have attacked on easter. Israel has seen homicide bombings on Easter, and they could do those here and will sometime in the future.

To be honest, If the United States could achieve total surprise by attacking on Easter, and it would save the lives of US servicemen, then I am all for it. Fight those barbarians now or fight them later. I would just as soon fight them now. You can not have it both ways. Peace is all Koombayah when you can have it, but there will be no peace when Iran has and uses Nukes in the near future. If hitting them on easter sunday keeps my son from being drafted in the near future, sign me up.


This is going to get me on alot of ignore lists!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top