06/21 | Daily Bird Flu Thread: Organ Damage Raises H5N1 Concerns in Canada

PCViking

Lutefisk Survivor
Organ Damage Raises H5N1 Concerns in Canada

Recombinomics Commentary
June 20, 2006

Four of 11 geese died Monday. A post-mortem examination of the bird was inconclusive, said Clark, who noted a number of diseases could have caused the organ damage seen.

The above comments do not appear to rule out high pathogenic avian influenza as the cause of the organ damage in one of the geese that died June 5. Thus, the comments add to the data indicating the Prince Edward Island geese deaths were due to the Qinghai strain of H5N1.


Initial testing confirmed that H5 infected the four geese that died after displaying symptoms on June 4. Symptoms, followed by waterfowl death are hallmarks of the Qinghai strain of H5N1. Low pathogenic H5 isolates do not usually kill waterfowl. Frequently, only a drop in egg production is noted.

The above comments on organ damage are in marked contrast to the OIE description of an H5 positive duck in British Columbia in 2005. That infection was from a low path H5N2 and the description of autopsy results indicated there was no evidence of active infectious disease

The suspect bird was a 40-day-old meat duck collected at processing. The bird was in excellent body condition with submitting criteria of dermatitis. No other visible lesions and no indication of any active disease process were observed on post-mortem examination.

Thus, there were four geese that had symptoms of H5N1 infection on Prince Edward Island. One of the birds was tested and was positive for H5 and the autopsy identified organ damage consistent with an H5N1 infection.

News is expected today or tomorrow from the National Labs in Winnipeg. Sequence data is expected, which will determine if the H5N1 cleavage site is present and additional sequence data can easily distinguish between North America and Qinghai polymorphisms.

At this time, the released information clearly points toward the H5N1 Qinghai strain of bird flu.

http://www.recombinomics.com/News/06200601/H5_Canada_Organ_Damage.html

:vik:
 

PCViking

Lutefisk Survivor
6/20/2006 6:12:00 PM

Canadian Lab Rules Out Bird Flu As Cause Of Goose's Death

OTTAWA (AP)--Canadian health officials on Tuesday ruled out a suspected case of avian flu, saying a goose that died last week appears to have been misdiagnosed. The country's national animal laboratory said it wasn't able to isolate any avian flu viruses from samples taken last week from domestic poultry on a Prince Edward Island farm, where one goose had earlier tested positive for an H5 virus.

Dr. Jim Clark, national manager of Canadian Food Inspection Agency's avian influenza working group, said the National Center for Foreign Animal Diseases lab was not able to reproduce the H5 virus finding made by the Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island. But he said signs suggest an H5 virus of low pathogenicity - meaning it doesn't kill chickens - had been present in the mixed backyard flock in western Prince Edward Island.

Four geese in the flock died from an unknown cause; the remaining birds were euthanized as a precautionary measure. The finding, announced Friday, raised concerns because North America is on the lookout for H5N1 viruses. The worrisome Asian H5N1 virus has infected at least 228 people - killing 129 of them - in 10 countries across Asia, Eastern Europe and North Africa. More than 50 countries to date have reported finding the virus in either poultry flocks or in wild birds.

http://www.cattlenetwork.com/content.asp?contentid=46453

:vik:
 

ferret

Membership Revoked
PCViking said:
Here is an important link... Johns Hopkins on influenza:

There are a couple things in there which caught my eye.

First, I thought a lot of people were skeptical about Nanomasks but this presentation seems to endorse them.

The next generation of masks are called Nanomasks. These boast of latest technologies like 2H filtration and nanotechnology, which are
capable of blocking particles as small as 0.027 micron.

Secondly, I know there has been a lot of debate about disposable respirators. this presentation says that(...):

*May be used until breathing becomes difficult, or they become damaged, dirty, or grossly contaminated with sweat/saliva.

*If contact transmission is of concern, it may be appropriate to dispose of the respirator immediately after each use [I think this is a given]

*Otherwise, it may be stored and reused according to the facility’s infection control policy and procedure.
I think the first and third points are a lot more generous than some have suggested.
 

PCViking

Lutefisk Survivor
Flu pandemic could force closure of national cemeteries

Taps could be silenced for veterans who die during a bird flu outbreak. The Department of Veterans Affairs foresees closing the 120 national cemeteries in a pandemic because of staffing shortages, leaving families the option of delaying burial or seeking interment elsewhere.

http://www.omaha.com/index.php?u_pg=1642&u_sid=2192770

:vik:
 

PCViking

Lutefisk Survivor
Chaos in USA

Report: USDA lacks plan for bird flu testing
Current screening methods unable to accurately monitor virus' spread

Updated: 2 hours, 48 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - The Bush administration lacks a comprehensive plan for testing and monitoring bird flu in commercial poultry, a federal audit says.

The industry is testing every flock for bird flu, but the tests are voluntary and there is no method for reporting findings to the federal government, the Agriculture Department’s inspector general said Tuesday.

As a result, the department does not know the extent of surveillance being done in each state and is not gathering consistent data that would indicate whether the deadly Asian strain of bird flu is present, and if so, how widespread it is, according to the audit.

In response to the criticism, the department said it was developing a strategy for assembling such a plan, promising to design a national bird flu testing system by Oct. 31.

The inspector general’s recommendations “have only furthered our plans to prepare and respond to any avian influenza outbreak,” said department spokeswoman Karen Eggert.

Department officials told the inspector general they only recently got the funding necessary for such a plan. The inspector general agreed with department plans for fixing the problems identified in the report, Eggert noted.

USDA relying too heavily on states?

Critics worry that the department is relying too heavily on states for surveillance. The report noted there are disparities in how states do the testing.

“The federal government continues to push the responsibility of finding and responding to a possible outbreak of avian influenza on states,”
said Iowa Sen. Tom Harkin, the Senate Agriculture Committee’s senior Democrat.

“As a result, USDA does not have a comprehensive national plan for surveillance and monitoring of poultry flocks and states lack adequate federal resources to respond to potential avian influenza outbreaks,” Harkin said.

Bird flu is commonly found in U.S. poultry, but the deadly Asian strain that has killed at least 128 people has not been found in this country. So far, most human cases have been linked to infected birds, but scientists fear the virus will mutate into a highly contagious form that spreads easily among people.

The inspector general identified disparities in how states tests for bird flu; for example, one state fully tests chickens, turkeys and eggs, while another tests only flocks covered by a federal-state-industry program for controlling diseases.


The disparities worry foreign trading partners, the report said. Other countries don’t understand why the U.S. can’t provide the number of tests by state, advise whether all types of commercial poultry are tested or say whether backyard flocks are being tested, the report said.

The U.S. is the world’s biggest producer and exporter of poultry meat.

The department created a committee to put together a comprehensive surveillance and monitoring plan, but the committee did not have a leader for most of 2005, the report said. A newly hired staff veterinarian has now been assigned to chair the committee.

The report also raised concerns with how the Agriculture Department tracks potential instances of bird flu. Employees didn’t complete investigations within a week, as the department requires. The inspector general found 46 unresolved investigations of potential bird flu, 43 of which were not completed for more than six months.

The department closed the cases
after investigators asked about them, saying the work had been finished but not recorded.

Officials still don’t know how much poultry in the U.S. already is being tested or monitored, the report said.

And while testing has been done by states and live bird markets, the findings haven’t been analyzed to draw conclusions about flu in U.S. bird populations or detect changes in types of flu or how widespread it is, the report said.

“Thus, it is difficult or impossible to reach valid conclusions based on the data,” the report said.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13444205/

:vik:
 

New Freedom

Veteran Member
PCViking said:
Report: USDA lacks plan for bird flu testing
Current screening methods unable to accurately monitor virus' spread

Updated: 2 hours, 48 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - The Bush administration lacks a comprehensive plan for testing and monitoring bird flu in commercial poultry, a federal audit says.

The industry is testing every flock for bird flu, but the tests are voluntary and there is no method for reporting findings to the federal government, the Agriculture Department’s inspector general said Tuesday.

As a result, the department does not know the extent of surveillance being done in each state and is not gathering consistent data that would indicate whether the deadly Asian strain of bird flu is present, and if so, how widespread it is, according to the audit.

In response to the criticism, the department said it was developing a strategy for assembling such a plan, promising to design a national bird flu testing system by Oct. 31.

The inspector general’s recommendations “have only furthered our plans to prepare and respond to any avian influenza outbreak,” said department spokeswoman Karen Eggert.

Department officials told the inspector general they only recently got the funding necessary for such a plan. The inspector general agreed with department plans for fixing the problems identified in the report, Eggert noted.

USDA relying too heavily on states?

Critics worry that the department is relying too heavily on states for surveillance. The report noted there are disparities in how states do the testing.

“The federal government continues to push the responsibility of finding and responding to a possible outbreak of avian influenza on states,”
said Iowa Sen. Tom Harkin, the Senate Agriculture Committee’s senior Democrat.

“As a result, USDA does not have a comprehensive national plan for surveillance and monitoring of poultry flocks and states lack adequate federal resources to respond to potential avian influenza outbreaks,” Harkin said.

Bird flu is commonly found in U.S. poultry, but the deadly Asian strain that has killed at least 128 people has not been found in this country. So far, most human cases have been linked to infected birds, but scientists fear the virus will mutate into a highly contagious form that spreads easily among people.

The inspector general identified disparities in how states tests for bird flu; for example, one state fully tests chickens, turkeys and eggs, while another tests only flocks covered by a federal-state-industry program for controlling diseases.


The disparities worry foreign trading partners, the report said. Other countries don’t understand why the U.S. can’t provide the number of tests by state, advise whether all types of commercial poultry are tested or say whether backyard flocks are being tested, the report said.

The U.S. is the world’s biggest producer and exporter of poultry meat.

The department created a committee to put together a comprehensive surveillance and monitoring plan, but the committee did not have a leader for most of 2005, the report said. A newly hired staff veterinarian has now been assigned to chair the committee.

The report also raised concerns with how the Agriculture Department tracks potential instances of bird flu. Employees didn’t complete investigations within a week, as the department requires. The inspector general found 46 unresolved investigations of potential bird flu, 43 of which were not completed for more than six months.

The department closed the cases
after investigators asked about them, saying the work had been finished but not recorded.

Officials still don’t know how much poultry in the U.S. already is being tested or monitored, the report said.

And while testing has been done by states and live bird markets, the findings haven’t been analyzed to draw conclusions about flu in U.S. bird populations or detect changes in types of flu or how widespread it is, the report said.

“Thus, it is difficult or impossible to reach valid conclusions based on the data,” the report said.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13444205/

:vik:


And I thought Canada was bad......I don't believe their findings today........

NOW THIS in CONUS......UNBELIEVABLE.....TRULY UNBELIEVABLE !!!
:sht:
 

PCViking

Lutefisk Survivor
Avian influenza – situation in Indonesia – update 20

20 June 2006

The Ministry of Health in Indonesia has confirmed the country’s 51st case of human infection with the H5N1 avian influenza virus.


The case, which was fatal, occurred in a 13-year-old boy from South Jakarta. He developed symptoms on 9 June one week after helping his grandfather slaughter diseased chickens at the family home. The boy was hospitalized on 13 June and died on 14 June.

The grandfather remains healthy. Contact tracing and monitoring are under way to ensure no further cases arise from this exposure setting.

Of the 51 cases confirmed to date in Indonesia, 39 have been fatal.


Expert consultation


WHO, FAO, and the Indonesian ministries of health and agriculture are jointly convening an expert consultation in Jakarta from 21 to 23 June. The consultation is being held, at the request of the government’s national commission on avian influenza and pandemic influenza, to assess the avian influenza situation in poultry and humans.

The consultation, which will be attended by more than 40 national and international experts, will review measures for addressing the widespread presence of the virus in poultry and offer advice on strategies for reducing the number of human cases. The experts will also examine epidemiological and virological data collected during a month-long investigation of a cluster of cases among family members in the Kubu Simbelang village of North Sumatra.

More than three weeks (two times the maximum incubation period) have passed since the last case in the cluster died on 22 May. Daily house-to-house monitoring for influenza-like illness was conducted throughout the village and in health care facilities where patients were treated, and no further cases were detected. While these findings indicate no significant changes in the epidemiology of the disease, results from investigation of the cluster will be reviewed as they may yield lessons useful in the investigation and interpretation of other large clusters where human-to-human transmission is suspected.

Several viruses have been isolated from the seven confirmed cases in the cluster and these have been fully sequenced at WHO reference laboratories in Hong Kong and the USA. Experts from these laboratories will be presenting their findings for review during the consultation.

http://www.who.int/csr/don/2006_06_20/en/index.html

:vik:
 

PCViking

Lutefisk Survivor
Hong Kong; 70 cases under Surveillance

Hospital Authority Enhanced Surveillance Programme
**************************************************

In view of a human case of avian influenza H5N1 in Shenzhen, the Hospital Authority (HA) started the three-week Enhanced Surveillance Programme from June 15, 2006.

Public hospitals should report to the Authority's e-Flu system all patients fulfilling the case definition of having pneumonia (all types) of unidentified etiology and who had travelled in the seven days before the onset of symptoms, to affected areas/ countries with confirmed human cases of avian influenza infection in the past six months.

HA today (June 20) received the report of a total of 14 cases (8 male, 6 female, aged 2.5- month to 85). So far a total of 70 cases (39 male, 31 female, aged 2.5-month to 89) have been received. These patients have visited Guangdong, Hunan, Hubei, Fujian and Zhejiang before the onset of symptoms. HA has reported the cases to the Centre for Health Protection. Public hospitals are providing rapid tests for these patients.

Ends/Tuesday, June 20, 2006

http://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/200606/20/P200606200234.htm

:vik:
 

PCViking

Lutefisk Survivor
Audit Report
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
Oversight of Avian Influenza

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Executive Summary

This report presents the results of the Office of Inspector General’s (OIG) audit of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) oversight of Avian Influenza (AI). We assessed the adequacy of APHIS’ procedures to identify the occurrence of AI in the United States and to limit the impact on the general public and poultry industry. We concluded that APHIS has made commendable progress in developing plans and establishing the networks necessary to prepare for, and respond to, outbreaks of AI. However, APHIS has not yet developed a comprehensive approach for surveillance and monitoring of AI in domestic poultry.

APHIS relies on a variety of voluntary State and commercial programs to monitor and test domestic poultry and wild birds. Because these programs are voluntary and there is no mechanism for reporting activity to APHIS, it does not know the extent of surveillance activity in place; and APHIS is not gathering consistent data to enable it to draw conclusions, to permit the detection of changes in epidemiological parameters (e.g., subtype of AI or rate of prevalence), or to report incidents of AI in accordance with new international trade requirements.

In response to the President’s National Strategy for Pandemic Influenza (Strategy),1 APHIS has developed the National AI Preparedness and Response Plan (Response Plan) to address the threat of AI. Characterized by its authors as a “living document” and subject to revision, it establishes a comprehensive approach to the management of an outbreak of highly pathogenic AI (HPAI) on a large commercial poultry operation. It incorporates best practices and procedures from incident management disciplines—homeland security, emergency management, law enforcement, firefighting, public works, public health, responder and recovery worker health and safety, emergency medical services, and the private sector—and integrates them into a unified structure. It forms the basis for how the Federal Government coordinates with State, local, and Tribal Governments, and the private sector once an incident occurs.

To date, APHIS’ resources have been primarily directed toward responding to a potential HPAI pandemic. APHIS is coordinating and establishing networks with other Federal, State, and private entities. The agency is working with Federal and State cooperators in developing strategies for monitoring migratory birds, as well as working internationally to provide education, outreach, and technical assistance.

Worldwide, there are many strains of the AI virus that can cause varying degrees of clinical illness in poultry. AI viruses can infect chickens, turkeys, pheasants, quail, ducks, geese, and guinea fowl, as well as a wide variety of other birds, including migratory waterfowl. This virus changes rapidly in nature by mixing its genetic components to form different virus subtypes. AI is caused by many slightly different viruses. There are 144 different characterizations of the AI virus based on two groups of proteins found on the surface of the virus. One group is composed of hemagglutinin proteins (H), of which there are 16 different types (H1-H16); the other group is composed of neuraminidase proteins (N), of which there are 9 different types (N1-N9).

AI viruses can be further classified into low pathogenicity and high pathogenicity forms based on the severity of illness they cause in poultry. Most AI strains are classified as low pathogenic AI (LPAI) and cause mild or asymptomatic infections in birds. In contrast, HPAI causes a severe and extremely contagious illness and death among infected birds. Mortality rates for birds affected by an HPAI outbreak can be as high as 90 to 100 percent, and any surviving birds are usually in poor condition. While LPAI infections are typically mild, some low pathogenic subtypes–the H5 and H7 strains-have the capacity to mutate into highly pathogenic strains. These types of infections, as well as HPAI, are referred to as notifiable AI (NAI).2 LPAI poses no known serious threat to human health. However, some strains of HPAI viruses can be infectious to people.

APHIS officials stated that the agency had only recently received adequate funding and that its approach had been to bolster surveillance and control in the most important areas first while identifying additional surveillance needs. On December 12, 2005, we issued a management alert to APHIS which outlined concerns with current AI surveillance activities. In its response, APHIS described a number of initiatives planned and in-process to address our concerns. For example, the National Surveillance Unit is currently developing standards for the design of surveillance systems within Veterinary Services and plans to publish these standards in early 2006. Following these standards, a National AI Surveillance System (to include Federal and non-Federal surveillance components) will be designed as a component of comprehensive poultry disease surveillance. The project completion date is October 31, 2006.

In regard to its Response Plan, APHIS needs to provide additional guidance on preparing for and responding to HPAI or NAI outbreaks in live bird markets or other “off–farm” environments, clarify actions that employees should take in obtaining and administering necessary vaccines and anti-virals in the event that a culling operation for HPAI occurs, and finalize interagency coordination on the process and procedures for notifying owners of susceptible animals of the current infectivity risks, and the necessary protective actions they should take when an outbreak of AI occurs.

Recommendations In Brief


In our management alert, we recommended that APHIS develop and implement a comprehensive AI surveillance plan and perform and document an analysis that identifies any gaps in sampling surveillance and assesses risk as a basis for determining the need for additional sampling. In response, APHIS provided a strategy for developing a comprehensive plan. APHIS should update its response to include details of how the inventory of current surveillance systems will be developed and revised timeframes for project completion.

We recommend that APHIS revise the Response Plan to include detailed instructions for (1) handling HPAI occurrences in live bird market systems and other “off-farm” environments and (2) obtaining and administering vaccines and anti-virals to people in the event of a culling operation.
Also, APHIS needs to coordinate with the Farm Service Agency and the States to develop and formalize producer notification and action procedures when an outbreak of AI occurs, to include identification of the roles and responsibilities of personnel involved, specific timeframes for action, and linkage to the Standard Operating Procedures set forth in the Response Plan.

http://www.usda.gov/oig/webdocs/33099-11-HY.pdf

:vik:
 

JPD

Inactive
Indonesia, World Health Discuss Bird Flu Control Plan (Update1)

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000101&sid=aCArWAVGRzmg&refer=japan



June 21 (Bloomberg) -- Indonesian officials began a meeting with world health authorities today to help fight bird flu, which has killed a person every six days in the nation this year.

Keiji Fukuda, the coordinator of the World Health Organization's global influenza program, and other experts will advise the government on ways to gain better control of the H5N1 flu strain that's spread in poultry to most of the country's 33 provinces. The Southeast Asian nation accounts for a third of the 130 human H5N1 fatalities reported worldwide since late 2003.

``We want to pose the question to experts: this is the reality, so what do we need to do next?'' Bayu Krisnamurti, secretary of a government-appointed committee on avian and pandemic flu, said in an interview before the three-day meeting in the capital, Jakarta. ``We want to see if the implementation of our strategic plan needs to be refined.''

Diseased fowl increase the risk for humans and provide more chances for the virus to mutate into a pandemic form capable of killing millions of people. Disease trackers are monitoring for H5N1, described by some scientists as the most lethal avian flu strain yet recorded, which has spread in birds to almost 40 countries in Asia, Europe and Africa this year.

Zambia in southern Africa is investigating a possible avian flu outbreak after more than 40 wild birds were found dead at a Victoria Falls resort town, Agence France-Presse reported yesterday. A laboratory in the capital, Lusaka, is testing the dead birds discovered over the past two days, AFP said, citing Jack Shoko, chief veterinary officer in the town of Livingstone.

To date, H5N1 has infected 228 people in 10 countries, killing 130 of them, the WHO said yesterday. Indonesia has reported 34 cases, including 28 fatalities, this year alone.

Indonesia's Strategy

Indonesia's strategy of using animal vaccines, disinfecting coops and incinerating dead birds hasn't prevented the disease from becoming endemic in the country that has 1.3 billion poultry.

The government hasn't raised sufficient public awareness of the dangers of the H5N1 virus and can't properly fund its avian flu programs, particularly those aimed at controlling the virus in poultry, Krisnamurti said.

Indonesia must focus on culling poultry to eradicate the disease and control its spread, Tri Satya Putri Naipospos, vice chairwoman of the government's avian and pandemic flu committee, said on June 19.

Surveillance of the disease should be given higher priority, the World Bank said this month, adding that there is a mismatch between the government's national avian flu plan and the allocation of funding. The 2006 national budget includes 555 billion rupiah ($59 million) for avian flu, of which a third is for animal health and two-thirds for human health, it said.

Backyards

Indonesia has about 70,000 villages spread across 17,000 islands. Poultry are raised in the backyards of about 80 percent of the country's 55 million households, said John Budd, head of communications with the United Nation's Children's Fund, or UNICEF, in Jakarta.

The nation of 238 million people confirmed its 51st human H5N1 case yesterday. The country attracted international attention last month, after seven members of a family from the island of Sumatra were infected. They represent the largest reported instance in which H5N1 may have been spread among people and the first evidence of a three-person chain of infection.

Today, Indonesian officials will meet representatives from the United Nations health and agriculture agencies, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, European Center for Disease Control, Epicentre France and Japan's National Institute for Infectious Diseases to assess the avian flu situation.

``With this consultation, Indonesia is taking another step to assess how best to protect the health of its people,'' Paul Gully, a senior adviser for communicable diseases at the WHO, said in a statement yesterday. ``The results will certainly be of great importance to all worldwide, who are eyeing the risk of the next pandemic.''
 

JPD

Inactive
Agriculture Department Faulted on Bird Flu Efforts

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/21/washington/21flu.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

By DONALD G. McNEIL Jr.
Published: June 21, 2006

The Agriculture Department lacks a comprehensive plan for detecting avian flu in poultry and wild birds, its inspector general's office said yesterday.
Skip to next paragraph

In an audit, the office found that the department relied too heavily on voluntary testing by the poultry industry and reports from state agriculture departments.

A spokeswoman for the department, Hallie Pickhardt, said that the agency "agreed with everything in the report, and we're either doing it or going to be doing it."

The audit began before Congress passed President Bush's plan for dealing with a pandemic flu outbreak, which gave the department an additional $91 million to fight avian flu, Ms. Pickhardt said.

But she added that the agency had no plans to make the voluntary testing now conducted by the poultry industry mandatory.

"We're confident in the testing procedure they're implementing," Ms. Pickhardt said. "They've been working very closely with us. This is their livelihood, too, and they have no reason not to report the information."

Instead, the department will supplement the voluntary testing with its own checks, she said.

The audit also recommended more testing in live-bird markets (where mild avian flu infections have been found in the past) and at illegal auctions of fighting gamecocks. It also called for a plan to protect workers with vaccines and flu drugs if infected flocks needed to be culled.

In January, the National Chicken Council, an industry trade group, said that its members, which produce more than 90 percent of the country's chickens, would test every flock for influenza two weeks before slaughter.

Yesterday, Stephen Pretanik, the council's science director, said the industry was already sharing those test results with the Agriculture Department.

Mr. Pretanik said all the swabs taken from chickens were sent to state laboratories or to laboratories accredited by the department, which are required to report positive results to the government.

The industry modeled its testing on the department's own proposals "so there will be a seamless transition when their regulations are published," he said.

Poultry experts said in January that if the lethal flu strain arrived in American domestic poultry, complicated tests would not be needed to spot it. Unlike other bird flus, the A(H5N1) strain, which has killed millions of chickens and 130 people since 2003, can wipe out a flock of thousands in 24 hours.

In Canada yesterday, veterinary officials said they had been unable to find enough virus to test in samples from a goose that had tested positive for an H5 virus in a local laboratory. They said they thought it was unlikely that the goose, on Prince Edward Island, would prove to be the first North American case of A(H5N1) flu, but said they needed an additional 12 days to try to culture the virus in eggs so it could be tested.

World Health Organization officials said yesterday that Indonesia had its 39th confirmed death from the virus, a 13-year-old boy from South Jakarta who died on June 14. He became sick on June 9, a week after helping his grandfather slaughter diseased chickens. Other members of the family are apparently healthy.

Flu Plan at Veterans Agency

WASHINGTON, June 20 (AP) — The Department of Veterans Affairs said it would close its national cemeteries in the event of a bird flu pandemic because of staffing shortages, leaving families to delay burial or seek interment elsewhere.

According to a draft plan, the veterans health care system would continue treating veterans at its hospitals and clinics, and would provide care to active-duty military personnel and civilians if necessary.
 

JPD

Inactive
Lab needs more time to decide if avian flu has hit P.E.I.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20060620.wpeibirdflu0620/BNStory/National/home

Canadian Press

Questions raised by the discovery of an H5 avian flu virus on a Prince Edward Island poultry farm can't yet be put to rest, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency admitted Tuesday as it announced its laboratory could not find any avian flu viruses in samples taken from the birds on the farm.

“We can't produce the same test result in Winnipeg that the Atlantic Veterinary College produced on testing the samples,” Dr. Jim Clark, national manager of CFIA's avian influenza working group, said in a conference call for journalists. “All samples that we have in Winnipeg have been tested, with negative results.”

The negative findings don't mean the original test was false, although federal officials are investigating that possibility.

But this development does mean that the agency's lab now has to resort to inoculating eggs with material from the bird samples in the hopes that virus grows in those eggs so that they will have material they can study and test.

It also means it may take 12 more days before CFIA's National Centre for Foreign Animal Diseases in Winnipeg will have answers about the nature of this virus — and that's if it gets answers at all.

If the lab doesn't succeed in growing virus, there will be no way of saying for sure what the full subtype of the virus was.

Dr. Clark said this turn of events isn't unheard of, because avian influenza viruses “are reasonably fragile and do degrade fairly quickly.

“There also may have been extremely low volumes or quantities of virus present that were detectable within the Atlantic context but may not have survived long enough to be detectable in Winnipeg.”

Evidence from the farm suggests the virus probably wasn't the worrisome Asian H5N1 virus. Most of the flock was perfectly healthy, including chickens; the Asian viruses are lethal to chickens.

“I don't believe that what we're dealing with here is the H5N1 Asian strain . . . simply because if that virus was present it would have killed the majority of the birds on the premise and it would have been reasonably detectable over long terms,” Dr. Clark said.

He noted the agency was lifting a quarantine imposed on a second farm because of lack of disease among birds there.

The quarantine was ordered Sunday after CFIA investigators learned there has been human traffic — and perhaps movement of poultry — between the two farms. Samples from the second farm also failed to show evidence of avian influenza viruses.

CFIA's vice-president of science, Dr. Judith Bosse, said the difficulty in finding virus to test is another hint this was not the Asian H5N1 virus. In fact, she said, it is very unlikely an avian influenza virus killed the goose.

“We can tell it's not that that killed the goose. Otherwise we would have recovered quite a bit of virus,” Bosse said from Ottawa.

Dr. Clark said the federal agency is working with officials of the Atlantic Veterinary College, in Charlottetown, to rule out the possibility that the positive test result was the product of laboratory contamination.

Still, he suggested CFIA believes there was an H5 virus — but a North American virus of low pathogenicity.

“Based on the fact that we had a positive PCR result, we're reasonably confident that . . . at some point in time these birds were exposed to an H5 virus.

“All of the other information that we have suggests that that H5 virus was low pathogenicity and likely fairly low quantities in the environment in that we can't seem to reproduce the same result in Winnipeg.”

Dr. Bosse noted much milder North American H5N1 viruses were found in wild birds in Atlantic Canada last fall. Like this one, she said, they were difficult to grow for testing purposes.

Four geese at the first farm died on June 5. But the rest of the birds in the mixed, free-range flock — additional geese, ducks and chickens — remained healthy until they were euthanized as a precautionary measure.

The worrisome Asian H5N1 virus has infected at least 228 people — killing 130 of them — in 10 countries across Asia, eastern Europe and North Africa. More than 50 countries to date have reported finding the virus in either poultry flocks or in wild birds.
 

JPD

Inactive
H5 Test Failure in Winnipeg Raises Pandemic Concerns

http://www.recombinomics.com/News/06210601/H5_Winnipeg_Failure.html

Recombinomics Commentary
June 21, 2006

The fact that the H5 virus was not detected in testing at the Winnipeg lab, along with the absence of clinical signs of disease in the birds depopulated in the flock, indicates that only a very small amount of low pathogenicity virus may have been present in the index bird. A finding of incidental contamination in the index bird would not be unexpected given that it spent time out of doors and other birds on the farm were confirmed to have co-mingled with wild migratory birds which commonly carry AI viruses.


The above comments from the Canadian Food Inspection Agency provide additional evidence that the dead geese on Prince Edward Island (PEI) were killed by the Qinghai strain of H5N1. Since H5 was detected in the only dead bird tested, the chance that the infection was incidental is low.

The four dead birds had classical H5N1 symptoms. The H5 was detected in a free range backyard goose, which is more likely to interact with wild migratory birds, as indicated above. The four geese were said to be "walking oddly" on Sunday, June 4, another classical symptom of H5N1 infection. All four birds were found dead the next morning. Rapid death is another classical sign of H5N1 infection. The autopsied dead goose also had organ damage, which was also consistent with H5N1 infection.

The only aspect of the goose that was not consistent with the Qingahi strain of H5N1 was the delay in sending the sample to Winnipeg for sequencing and sero-typing. Since the announcement on Friday, June 16 indicated that H5 had been confirmed, the sample must have been positive at least twice prior to shipment. The long delay between death on June 5 and announcement of the H5 result on June 16 raises concerns over the handling of the sample, including sample degradation.

Since the four dead birds had a number of symptoms consistent with Qinghai H5N1 infection, it is unclear why only one of the dead birds was tested. Determining the sequence of the HA cleavage site is routine, so it is unclear why that test was not be done locally on PEI. The Qinghai strain of H5N1 is quite distinctive, so a small amount of sequence data across any of the eight gene segments would have provided conclusive data on the relationship between the H5 in the dead goose, and the Qinghai stain of H5N1.

The failure to find spread of the H5 provided little data on the relationship to the Qinghai strain. Since symptoms were observed Sunday and the geese were dead Monday morning, the interactions with other birds whie the infected geese were contagious may have been limited. Since all four birds developed symptoms and died at the same time, a common source was likely. However, if the common source was wild birds, they may have flown away and limited exposure of the other birds on the farm.

The failure of Winnipeg to detect the H5, which had been confirmed on PEI, is cause for concern. The testing of only one goose and delay in testing and/or shipping of samples on PEI indicates pandemic H5N1 bird flu testing in Canada is inadequate.
 

JPD

Inactive
We can't predict when bird flu will evolve into human pandemic: Chinese expert

http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/200606/21/eng20060621_276032.html

We can not predict when bird flu will evolve into a human pandemic but at present there is no evidence to show the current avian influenza virus H5N1 can be spread among humans, according to a Chinese expert.

Suspected cases of human-to-human transmission in Indonesia have set off international alarm bells. Six family members from a remote farming village on Sumatra died after testing positive for the bird flu virus - the world's largest reported family cluster.

Shu Yuelong, director of the National Influenza Center under the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, said suspected cases of human-to-human transmission have also been reported in Vietnam, Thailand and other countries in the past.

But there has been no conclusive evidence showing that the H5N1 virus has evolved into a human-to-human transmission virus, Shu was quoted by China Population News as saying.

Not only epidemiological but also aetiological evidence is needed to determine whether a virus can be transmitted between humans, Shu said.

During its evolution, the H5N1 virus has acquired the ability to infect and kill mammals. But the number of human infection cases is still small, Shu said.

He said that the research of the National Influenza Center showed that the gene of the virus extracted from Chinese bird flu patients is different from those of human cases in Vietnam, Thailand and Indonesia.

No trace of human influenza has been found in the gene of the virus extracted from Chinese patients of bird flu, Shu added.

Source: Xinhua
 

JPD

Inactive
Zambia tests for bird flu after death of chickens

http://www.sabcnews.com/africa/southern_africa/0,2172,129715,00.html

June 20, 2006, 20:00

Zambia is testing residents in the tourist resort city of Livingstone for bird flu after chickens were found dead in their owners' backyards, a health official said.

"We are investigating the matter but so far there has been no confirmation of an outbreak," Simon Miti, the permanent secretary at the health ministry, said.

It was not clear how many chickens had died, but Miti said several residents had been sent to hospital for tests after they cooked and ate the dead birds.

A health official in Livingstone, 480km south of the capital Lusaka, said some of the birds had been sent to South Africa for testing. - Reuters
 

Bill P

Inactive
From the following it seems starightforward obvious that:

1. H2H is occuring in Indonesia.
2. Indonesia is overwhelmed and unable to cope with the pandemic.
3. Concern now has shifted from H2H to sustainable H2H transmission.

The horses are out of their starting gates.





Experts discuss bird flu issue in Indonesia

http://www.birdflubreakingnews.com/...ople.com.cn/200606/21/eng20060621_275987.html

Some of the world's top experts on bird flu met in Jakarta on Wednesday to discuss concern over possible human transmission on the largest cluster in Karo, North Sumatra and to map out a strategy for Indonesia to fight the outbreak.

Scientists from the World Health Organization (WHO), the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (U.S. CDC), European Center for Disease Control (ECDC) among others, would consult with the Indonesian government to make a strategy to control the avian influenza virus, said a press release issued by an Indonesian agency of bird flu control.

The meeting was held a month after Indonesia grappled with the largest bird flu cluster death in a remote farming area in Sumatra island and amid the rising number of death in the outbreak.

Seven people linked by blood died of bird flu in the province last month.

Indonesia has recorded 39 deaths out of 53 contracted people cased by the highly pathogenic virus of H5N1.

"We don't completely understand what was happening in Indonesia, what changes, so it is important to try to get some understanding about what changes," Regional Manager Emergency Center for trans- boundary Animal Disease of the FAO, Laurence J Gleeson told Xinhua on the sidelines of the meeting.

He said there was distinct lack of flow of information about the largest cluster death in Karo, North Sumatra, which has raised response from the international community.

"When this occurred in Karo, there was a lot of international concern about what is happening in Indonesia, and there was a very distinct lack of flow of information," he said.

He said the meeting wants to put together the efforts to stop the outbreak from animal and human sides.

An investigation into the largest cluster has been completed, but the result has been unpublished yet, according to a director of the Indonesian Health Ministry Nyoman Kandun.

However, the WHO Technical Officer Steven Bjorge said that it was not the human-to -human transmission now, but the sustainability of and the spread of the virus.

"It is not human to human transmission as the important thing, it is whether or not it becomes sustainable and sporadic,
every cluster that occurred so far has been contained in one small family group. That the situation is still seen in Indonesia as well," he told Xinhua.

Source: Xinhua
 

Taz

Deceased
One sniff of BF in this country and there will go the chickens and eggs. I would not be buying any Tyson stock soon.
 

Bill P

Inactive
June 21, 2006 07:30 AM US Eastern Timezone

NanoViricides Says AviFluCide(TM)-I May be the Leading Drug Against H5N1 Avian Flu

WEST HAVEN, Conn.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--June 21, 2006--NanoViricides, Inc. (Pink Sheets:NNVC), today announced that it is extremely proud of the results achieved by the NanoViricides' scientific staff in Hanoi, Vietnam during April and May 2006. The Government of Vietnam was exceptionally cooperative and provided lab facilities, biologics and staff assistance to our team. To our knowledge we are the only company ever to have this opportunity to work within this high level facility of the Ministry of Health. Experiments were continued by the Vietnamese scientists after the NanoViricides scientific team returned to the US. We are now receiving and analyzing the data obtained from these experiments.


The Company believes the results of our bird flu drug, AviFluCide(TM)-I, have established that it is the leading drug against H5N1, based on a preliminary analysis. The Company will coordinate the press release with the Ministry of Health of the Government of Vietnam after the data analysis is completed.

The Company also announced that it has retained the services of the Gencarelli Group of Washington DC for business development purposes. The Gencarelli Group specializes in health and biotechnology business development in both public and private sectors.

At the end of May 2006, Form 144 -Notice of Proposed Sale of Securities, were filed with the SEC by the prior owners of the public shell company (then called edot-com) that became NanoViricides after our merger. This filing listed proposed sales by these shareholders of over 800,000 shares. The company believes that the recent stock price weakness is a result of the sale of these shares.

The company further announced that it has changed auditors as the company has grown quite rapidly and has now engaged the public auditing firm of Holtz Rubenstein Reminick LLP to perform the certified public audit. Holtz Rubenstein Reminick LLP is the "Fastest Growing Accounting Firm in America" (as recognized by both PAR, Sept. 2005, and Accounting Today, Apr. 2006) and one of the Top 25 Accounting Firms in New York (Crain's, Sept. 2005). It is a progressive regional accounting firm, providing a wide variety of accounting, tax and business advisory services to clients throughout the New York metropolitan area.

The audit is expected to be completed in early July. We expect to file with the SEC in order to become a fully reporting company shortly thereafter.

About NanoViricides - http://www.nanoviricides.com

NanoViricides, Inc. is a development stage company that is creating special purpose nanomaterials for viral therapy. A NanoViricide(TM) is a specially designed, flexible, nanomaterial that contains an encapsulated active pharmaceutical ingredient and targets it to a specific type of virus, like a guided missile. NanoViricide drugs are designed to block and dismantle the virus particles before they can infect a cell, thereby controlling viremia. This is a completely novel approach that is proving to be superior to existing approaches.

This press release contains forward-looking statements that reflect the Company's current expectation regarding future events. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Actual events could differ materially and substantially from those projected herein and depend on a number of factors including the success of the Company's research and development strategy, the availability of adequate financing, the successful and timely completion of clinical studies and the uncertainties related to the regulatory process.

Contacts
NanoViricides, Inc.
Leo Ehrlich, 917-853-6440
leo@nanoviricides.com
 

PCViking

Lutefisk Survivor
Posted on Wed, Jun. 21, 2006

Tyson chicken lab busy screening for avian flu

MONTE MITCHELL
Winston-Salem Journal

WILKESBORO, N.C. - Small vials of chicken-blood serum arrive by the thousands each week in FedEx and UPS deliveries to a brick building along N.C. 268.

Seven days a week, workers at the Tyson Foods laboratory conduct screening tests for avian influenza.

There are many types of bird flu, but the issue is getting worldwide attention because of a particular strain, the Asian avian influenza A (H5N1). The World Health Organization says that this strain of the Asian bird flu has killed 129 people since 2003, mostly in Indonesia and Vietnam.

This type of flu has never been detected in North America. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the spread of the disease from person to person is rare. Properly cooked chicken is safe to eat, even if it came from an infected bird.

The disease has spread to parts of Europe and Africa, and continues to pose an important and growing public health threat, the CDC says.

Tyson, as other poultry companies, has increased its testing for bird flu.

Every Tyson flock is tested before it leaves the farm. A negative test for avian influenza is required before the chickens can be loaded onto a truck for a trip to the processing plant. A flock would be destroyed and other biomedical safety steps taken if bird flu were ever found.

Tyson conducts 15,000 tests a week for avian influenza, about five times the number the company was conducting a year ago.
Most of the companywide testing is done at the Wilkesboro lab already, and the lab will soon do all the company's bird-flu testing for processing operations in 12 states.

"We were doing it before it was popular," said Leonard Brooks, the supervisor for the serology lab, talking about how Tyson has been testing for bird flu for decades. He has worked in the Wilkesboro lab for 40 years, with Holly Farms and then with Tyson. "We did a lot of this stuff before anybody ever thought about it," he said.

A bird-flu outbreak has never been associated with the Tyson Foods complex in Wilkesboro, but public perception is especially important in a county whose plant produces more pounds of chicken meat than any other Tyson processing plant in the nation. Tyson is the biggest employer in Wilkes County. The 91 million broiler chickens grown in Wilkes in 2004 made it the top county in North Carolina for broilers, according to the most recent statewide statistics released by the N.C. Department of Agriculture.

The increased company tests are one step in a line of defense designed to protect people and the chicken supply.

The state agriculture department also has an extensive program that has tested more than 200,000 birds from state poultry flocks in the past year.

Earlier this year, Tyson joined other chicken companies in a comprehensive testing program, announced by the National Chicken Council, the industry's trade association. The companies use procedures approved by the National Poultry Improvement Plan, a federal and state cooperative program. Because of the increased emphasis on the testing, Tyson has renovated a storage room to create more lab space for the avian-influenza tests.

The enclosed, climate-controlled chicken houses of Wilkes and surrounding counties represent a big difference in how chickens are raised, compared to the areas where the Asian bird-flu outbreaks have occurred. For instance, it's not uncommon for chickens in Asia to live closely with humans, wandering through a family's living areas.

Tyson growers here have bio-security measures in place - for example, they step into disinfectant baths before entering the house. They are also required to limit who enters a farm.

Chicken houses vary in size, but it's not unusual for a single broiler house to have 6,000 chickens that live together six to eight weeks. The flocks are raised together in "all-in, all-out" farming, isolating a particular flock to limit its exposure to outside birds and make it possible to trace a flock back to a farm.

Within 10 days of an anticipated slaughter date for the broilers, a service worker will go into the mass of squawking chickens in each house. The worker picks out several birds. In each, he'll do a wing stab to puncture a wing vein and collect two to three cubic centimeters of blood.

Because the bird-flu virus would move rapidly through a flock, a sample of birds is sufficient to see if any of the birds have been exposed to the virus.


Tyson workers deliver local samples to the Wilkesboro lab, which has an advanced international accreditation that requires audits and constant checks.

"Because of that, we have a tremendous quality standard in place," said Beverly Prevette, an associate chemist.

Samples from locally raised birds arrive in vials of whole blood. The vials that are shipped in from other regions contain only blood serum, a yellowish fluid that is separated from a blood clot after coagulation.

Lab workers conduct a basic scientific procedure called the Agar Gel Immunodiffusion Test to check for antibodies that would be produced in the presence of the virus. The test uses petri dishes filled with a clear gel. Workers use a manual hole-punch machine to create seven clusters of seven small wells in the gel. The middle well in each cluster holds an antigen - that's the substance a body reacts to by producing antibodies. A worker uses a pipette to put blood-serum samples into three of the surrounding wells, and the other three wells are filled with positive reference samples.

With three blood samples going into each of the seven clusters, each petri dish can test 21 birds. Each petri dish is labeled with the flock information, and then stored. The liquid from the samples diffuses through the gel. After 24 hours, a lab worker takes the petri dish into a darkened room and looks at it under a high-intensity light.

The worker looks for a thin white line that would appear if the antibodies try to link up to fight the virus. If workers ever do find a positive test, written instructions tell them who to call and what steps to take. The lab is screening for bird flu, and would send the sample to another lab for tests to determine the specific strain of flu

"We've already got procedures in place, what to do, sort of like a fire drill," said Chy Billings II, whose duties include being the lab's safety officer.

The lab building contains many testing rooms for other things besides bird flu. The more than 30 lab workers test chickens for pesticides, they test feed to make sure it provides adequate nutrition, and they analyze meat products being shipped to fast-food restaurants. The lab regularly monitors and tests breeder birds, checking to make sure they pass on maternal antibodies to chicks.

"We found out many years ago that preventative medicine is much better than curative medicine," Brooks said.

http://www.charlotte.com/mld/observer/news/local/14868820.htm

:vik:
 

PCViking

Lutefisk Survivor
Scientists aim to thwart use of flu as bioweapon

Flu is already a big killer, responsible for more than 35,000 deaths in the United States alone each year. And wild birds infected with the deadly H5N1 strain of bird flu are gradually broadening the scope of that disease. This week in Rochester, scientists are discussing ways to better understand the flu and also how to prevent the possibility that terrorists could somehow modify flu as a bioweapon to make it even more lethal than it is already.

Among the highlights of this week's two-day symposium, hosted by the University of Rochester Center for Biodefense Immune Modeling, is a lecture by Nobel Prize winner Peter Doherty, Ph.D., an expert on how flu spurs the immune system to defend itself against the infection. Doherty's technical talk on the roles of specific types of T-cells in influenza will be at 1:30 p.m. Friday, June 23, at the Rochester Marriott Airport Hotel on West Ridge Road. The lecture is free and open to the public.

During the symposium Thursday and Friday, University of Rochester experts in mathematics, statistics, immunology, and infectious diseases will join with colleagues from around the nation to discuss exactly how flu invades the body, how the body responds, and how mathematicians, statisticians, and computer scientists are working to help understand the pathogenesis of flu infection. The group will also talk about the potential of flu to be intentionally modified for use as a lethal weapon more deadly than bird flu, and ways to prevent that from happening.

"Flu viruses are deadly – witness the 1918 Spanish flu which killed millions of people – and with modification, they can be made even more deadly," said Hulin Wu, Ph.D., professor in the Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology and director of the modeling center. Wu's colleague, Martin Zand, M.D., Ph.D., co-director of the center, added that "We don't know whether flu will be weaponized; it's crucial to ask the question and to be prepared."

The focus of Wu's center, funded by the National Institutes of Health, is the mathematical modeling of infectious diseases. When the flu virus infects the body, for instance, a cascade of complex events occur to fight the virus as it commandeers cells and begins churning out viral particles that attack the body. The immune system falls back on an array of cells, especially antibody-producing B-cells and flu-killing T cells, to fight back. Understanding just how that occurs, and simulating that with computers, is the goal of the center.

Wu points to the improved treatment of HIV as an area where such an approach has already yielded enormous benefit to patients. Once considered a death sentence, HIV infection is now more commonly viewed as a chronic infection thanks largely to improved treatment. Much of the improvement is due to early mathematical models that helped scientists and physicians understand and target the disease more effectively.

"How flu infects the body and how the body responds to a flu infection is not understood completely," said Wu. "Mathematical models will help guide flu experts to ask the right questions, so that we understand it more thoroughly than we do today. Understanding exactly what is happening should help scientists evaluate how the virus will respond to drugs designed to treat an infection."

Since flu is already a killer, the discussions will have an immediate application among scientists looking for ways to stop or better treat "natural" flu. The work also helps scientists like John Treanor, M.D., and David Topham, Ph.D., who are designing and testing new vaccines designed to prevent all types of flu, including bird flu. The University is recognized internationally as a leader in the testing of bird-flu vaccines.

"For many years people did not recognize the importance of flu research," said Topham, associate professor of Microbiology and Immunology and a scientist in the David H. Smith Center for Vaccine Biology and Immunology. "Flu research was seen as humdrum and routine, and there was no driving force to do that research. It just sort of blended into the background. People assumed that since there is a vaccine, it wasn't a disease of interest any more.

"But with bird flu on the horizon and the vaccine shortages that have occurred in recent years, it's become a hotbed of research interest. Besides, flu is responsible for 35,000 deaths and 200,000 hospitalizations in the United States alone. It's a serious health problem," Topham added.


###

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-06/uorm-sat062106.php
 

PCViking

Lutefisk Survivor
Heart drugs might provide bird flu weapon: expert

By Maggie Fox, Health and Science Correspondent
2 hours, 34 minutes ago

The world's top-selling drugs, cholesterol-lowering statins, might provide a way to treat feared bird flu, according to a doctor and retired drug company executive who is trying to get the researchers to study the possibility.

Antivirals that affect the influenza virus are in short supply, and it will be years before vaccine makers can ramp up capacity enough to immunize the world's population against a pandemic flu.

But what if there was a cheap and widely available drug that helped treat the flu's worst symptoms and possibly save lives?

Evidence suggests that statin drugs, designed to lower cholesterol, might help turn a potentially deadly infection into a milder disease, according to Dr. David Fedson, who thinks world health authorities ought to take a harder look at the possibility.

"Generic statins are available in virtually every country," said Fedson, a retired U.S. physician living in France.

"You'll be able to take five days of statins in India for less than a dollar," Fedson, who was also director of medical affairs at Aventis Pasteur (now French drug company Sanofi Aventis), said in a telephone interview.

"We have something that conceivably could save tens of thousands of lives. This research is so important that we cannot afford not to take it."

Fedson, an expert on vaccination, cites several recent studies that show that statins reduce inflammation. Designed to lower cholesterol, the drugs work on several biological processes and may reduce the risk of Alzheimer's disease, some cancers, and multiple sclerosis.

In January, researchers in Canada reported that statins act against sepsis, a dangerous blood infection and a 2005 study published in the journal Respiratory Research found the death rate was 64 percent lower in pneumonia patients who had been taking statins.

IMMUNE STORM

Fedson cites yet other studies that suggest strongly that people who are infected with avian influenza have an immune system overreaction known as a cytokine storm.

Their immune system signals chemicals rush to fight off the alien virus, causing an inflammation of the lungs and other organs that may be what kills them.

"It's an idea, just an idea and it needs to be substantiated with both cellular-based and animal-based studies," Fedson said. "We need to do it and we need to do it fast."

He is getting some attention.

Fedson presented his idea last week to the Congress of Infectious Diseases in Lisbon, Portugal, and is to speak to a bird flu conference next week at the Institut Pasteur in Paris. He also has a paper in next month's issue of the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases.

Statins -- which include Pfizer Inc.'s $10 billion-a-year Lipitor, Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.'s Pravachol and Merck and Co. Inc.'s Zocor -- are the world's best-selling drugs, taken by millions to reduce the risk of heart attack.

Experts say a pandemic of some sort of influenza is inevitable.

The H5N1 avian influenza sweeping countries in Asia and also affecting Europe and Africa is considered the most likely candidate. So far it has rarely infected people, but has killed 130 out of 228 infected and just a few mutations would turn it into a form that could be passed easily from one person to another.

If this happens in the next few years, the World Health Organization and other experts agree the world is very poorly prepared and that millions could die.

A WHO spokesman said the agency had no immediate comment on Fedson's work, and spokespeople for companies that make statins said they had not looked into the possibility of testing the drugs in influenza patients.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060621/hl_nm/birdflu_statins_dc

:vik:
 
Top