Russia deploys advanced anti-missile systems near NATO's eastern borders

pixmo

Bucktoothed feline member
Moscow warns against stationing Alliance troops in the Baltics

MOSCOW: Russia has begun deploying advanced air defence systems in Belarus near NATO's eastern borders in response to the continuing expansion of the Atlantic alliance to the east.

The first batch of S-300PS mobile surface-to-air missiles arrived in Belarus over the weekend, the Russian Defence Ministry's newspaper Krasnaya Zvezda reported. Russia will supply a total of four S-300PS batteries consisting of 24 missile launchers.

According to Russia's Deputy Air Force Commander Aytech Bizhev, the deployment will extend the effective range of Russia's western air defence by 150 km and the detection of air targets by 400 km. The S-300PS is an all-altitude air defence missile capable of shooting down aircraft, cruise and ballistic missiles at a range of 90 km.

Belarus is Russia's closest ally in the former Soviet Union.

The two countries are planning to introduce a common currency and set up a joint defence command. Last month, Belarus leader Alexander Lukashenko, branded by the U.S. as "Europe's last dictator," won a third presidential term in an election denounced by the West as neither free nor fair.

Russia's Air Force Commander Vladimir Mikhailov described the deployment of S-300PS missiles as an "adequate response" to the admission of Poland and the former Soviet Baltic republics into NATO. Belarus shares borders with Poland, Luthuania and Latvia.

Russia is also concerned with U.S. plans to set up military bases in the former Warsaw Pact countries of Bulgaria and Romania, and deploy anti-missile systems in Poland and other East European states.

Russia's Defence Minister Sergei Ivanov warned that Moscow would view any deployment of NATO military forces in Poland and the Baltic countries as a violation of earlier agreements.

"Such redeployment could run counter to NATO commitment [under the 1997 Russia-NATO pact] to exercise restraint in deploying conventional forces," he said in an interview this week.

"In the event of a clear violation of the balance of forces near our borders, we reserve the lawful right to take all necessary measures to ensure the reliability of our national security."

http://www.hindu.com/2006/04/24/stories/2006042400631500.htm
 

Fuzzychick

Membership Revoked
Well my pucker factor went up a notch or two reading this, couple with the distinct possibility of BF coming around one must wonder where Helen is for one of her all too calming panic posts!:shkr: I really feel it's kinda prudent that forum members should take a serious look at where there at and consider getting together in their geographical areas to discuss and plan for these possibilities, but that's just me.;)
 

Wildweasel

F-4 Phantoms Phorever
Eehhhhhh... nothing big here to my SAM-squashing point of view.

The Russians have always lined their borders with Surface-to-Air Missile (SAM) sites. They've obviously finally decided to replace all their antiquated SA-2s, -3s, -6s and -8s with their SA-12 and new systems that are on par with the Patriot missle systems.

Not that I'd like to go up against a battle-line of SA-12s versus a bunch of SA-2s and -3s, but it is their border and they do have the right to defend their bordser. Just like we have the right to defend our borders, right?

Now if the report announced that the Russians have lined their borders with mobile SAM battalions that would be able to accompany armor and infantry forces in an advance across the borders, I'd be concerned.

WW
 

Mr. Gravy

Veteran Member
Now if the report announced that the Russians have lined their borders with mobile SAM battalions that would be able to accompany armor and infantry forces in an advance across the borders, I'd be concerned

Wildweasel,
from what I can find these are mobile. Are they too large to keep up with armor/ infantry?


The S-300PS (SA-10 Grumble) is a low-to-medium-range mobile missile system. It has four single-stage solid-propellant missiles that are housed in reusable launch/shipping canisters which are mounted on a dedicated transporter-erector-launch vehicle. The missile launches vertically, with an intercept altitude ranging from 20 meters to 40 km. The maximum intercept range for aircraft is 150 km and for ballistic missiles 40 km. The SA-10 can intercept cruise missiles, aircraft, as well as ballistic missiles at a speed of 3,000 meters per second (6,710 mph). It has a high-explosive warhead and the potential for a nuclear warhead.7 It is a moderately expensive system. An SA-10 complex outside of Moscow suffered a major explosion and fire on 8 June 2001, and the subsequent destruction of three of its launchers and 13 missiles represented a loss in excess of $17 million.

SA-10%20Grumble.JPG
 

ARMY RANGER

Inactive
:wvflg: I know what you mean fuzzychick,this world is getting really freaky. I have never seen anything like it in my 45 years. I gotta tell ya though sometimes I wish tswhtf because it might thin out the herd a little bit.;) :wvflg:
 

Wildweasel

F-4 Phantoms Phorever
Mr. Gravy said:
Wildweasel,
from what I can find these are mobile. Are they too large to keep up with armor/ infantry?

Mobile, as far as they can move from location to location with minimal teardown and set-up. But they don't keep up with the moving battle, they're rear-area protection.

I would be much more concerned about reading of concentrations of shoot-on-the-fly systems that can accompany armor and infantry to provide anti-aircraft coverage to units on the move.

WW
 
Top