POL (poll) So does Obama get any credit?

Does Obama earn any respect for ending combat actions in Iraq?

  • yes

    Votes: 22 9.9%
  • no

    Votes: 200 90.1%

  • Total voters
    222
  • Poll closed .

et2

TB Fanatic
So what say you. Does Obama get any browny points for ending military actions in Iraq?
 

duchess47

Has No Life - Lives on TB
No - there are still troops there.

Besides, I believe this is a plan put in motion by President Bush.
 

et2

TB Fanatic
can a mod please change the poll to read combat actions ? It is what I intend it to read. Thanks
 

Zinnia

Constancy

It ain't over yet.Just watch a debacle unfold.I predict that he'll be sending our soldiers back within the year.The ones remaining won't be enough.I'm not saying whether we should go or stay,but mark my words,this won't end pretty.

Besides,I have yet to see Obama display any competence,ever.
 

Hfcomms

EN66iq
No...not at all. Doesn't matter what you call them, combat troops or peacemakers. The patrols are still going on, the helicopters are still flying and we still have rapid reaction forces to bail out the Iraqies when they get in trouble. You can put perfume on a pig but it's still a pig.
 

et2

TB Fanatic
No...not at all. Doesn't matter what you call them, combat troops or peacemakers. The patrols are still going on, the helicopters are still flying and we still have rapid reaction forces to bail out the Iraqies when they get in trouble. You can put perfume on a pig but it's still a pig.

So the fact that most of our military combat forces are coming home from that hell hole doesn't mean anything? It was declared to be over before yet combat forces remained and continued to engage in a war that was based on a pack of lies. We still have military bases all over the world ... does that still mean we are at war with our old enemies?

I dunno ... I'm glad to finally see our soldiers coming home.
 

Garf

Inactive
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Withdrawal_of_U.S._troops_from_Iraq


Under this plan, the majority of troops will be withdrawn just a month after the deadline in the signed agreement between former President George W. Bush and Prime Minister of Iraq Nouri al-Maliki where the majority of troops will be withdrawn at one point, and the entirety of troops to be out by December 31, 2011.
..........................
This plan falls almost into perfect alignment with the one signed by President George W. Bush and then prime-minister Nouri Al-Maliki, with the exception of being a month behind, as the majority of troops under that plan were supposed to be withdrawn by June 30th, 2010 with all troops being withdrawn by December 31, 2011

And that's what Obama should get the credit for? Copying GW Bush, a month late?
 

mecoastie

Has No Life - Lives on TB
With 50000 troops still there in harms way I say no he doesnt get any credit. Sure the combat troops are out but then who is protecting our men and women still there? Hope it is more than the Iraqis and I fear we will see a rise in the nimber of American casualties due to the emboldened insurgents. If that is the case I hope he has the balls to send the combat troops back to get them all out.
 

jugglerr

Contributing Member
No the mans a hypocrite

Obama in 2007: “I am not persuaded that 20,000 additional troops in Iraq is going to solve the sectarian violence there. In fact, it will do the reverse….”

"preventing a potential genocide in Iraq isn’t a good enough reason to keep U.S. forces there."
 

Great Northwet

Veteran Member
Well darn it, I voted yes; of course now that I think about it, how does anyone know if this is the right course of action.

If Iraq runs as a responsible state on it's own, then I would give him the points in a year, or two. Otoh, if Iraq desintegrates into a chaotic cesspool(which I believe it could), then of course he should get all the blame.

I think history and hindsight will be the way that we know if it was a right or wrong choice.
 

undead

Veteran Member
So the fact that most of our military combat forces are coming home from that hell hole doesn't mean anything? It was declared to be over before yet combat forces remained and continued to engage in a war that was based on a pack of lies. We still have military bases all over the world ... does that still mean we are at war with our old enemies?

I dunno ... I'm glad to finally see our soldiers coming home.

The withdrawal trajectory was put in place even before Obama took office.

But I guess Obama could have deep-sixed that whole thing just out of spite.


:whistle:
 

Caplock50

I am the Winter Warrior
Nope, no credit. All the Liar-in-Chief did was, once again, vote 'present'. As has just been pointd out, Bush set the withdrawal schedule. All he did was let it happen.

He *will* try to take credit for it.

You watch, though...if things go haywire over there, he'll blame Bush, once again, for it.
 

Irish

Veteran Member
Right same stupid thing that has been time and time again. Let's pull out the combat troops and leave behind the support troops and US civilians that are being bombed again and again because there is no one to go after them or protect those left behind.
 

Grantbo

Inactive
Does Obama earn any respect for ending combat actions in Iraq?

No of course not. He didn't vote for the war, he didn't vote for the surge, he didn't pull out the moment he became pres as he repeatedly promised. He waited until Bush's war ended on it's own.

Thanks Mr. Bush for staying the course and winning when all the liberals wanted to cut and run.
 

Zulu Cowboy

Keep It Real...
He doesn't even deserve the title 'Commander in Chief', if you ask me...
Not until I see proof of U.S. citizenship.
The man is a fraud.

Zulu Cowboy
 

Sebastian

Sebastian
Anyone who thinks this is the end to combat in Iraq needs help tying their shoelaces.

The administration is just going to call it something other than combat.

Which is why there ar 50,000 troops there and god knows how many contractors.
 

Oilpatch Hand

3-Bomb General, TB2K Army
No credit. This troop drawdown was made possible not by his own exertions, but by those of men far superior to the current occupant of the White House. In fact, had Obama had his way in 2007-2008, this moment simply would not be possible.

In typical fashion, Obama is attempting to take credit for the accomplishments of vastly better men than himself.
 

undead

Veteran Member
This televised pronouncement was a political move intended to counter his real problems with the American people, and even within his own party. Like I said, the trajectory of this withdrawl had already been put in place before Obama took office, and what this was all about was Obama's own personal downward spiraling trajectory.
 

denfoote

Inactive
That POS gets no credit!! Impeach the fag!!

Gott im Himmel!!
I'd rather have Vlad Putin as President, at least he doesn't ride a girlie bike!!!
 

Lilbitsnana

On TB every waking moment
Well darn it, I voted yes; of course now that I think about it, how does anyone know if this is the right course of action.

If Iraq runs as a responsible state on it's own, then I would give him the points in a year, or two. Otoh, if Iraq desintegrates into a chaotic cesspool(which I believe it could), then of course he should get all the blame.

I think history and hindsight will be the way that we know if it was a right or wrong choice.

Why? He had no part in setting up any type of gov there.

What exactly has he done that GWB didn't put in place or outline?

That would be like giving me points instead of A. G. Bell because I used the telephone today.
 

NC Susan

Deceased
Obama makes speeches for folks who rely on one sentence sound bytes and get their news from ABC/NBC/CBS/CNN

How awful to have to come back from vacation to a redecorated White House to have to work for one day



images
 

Dozdoats

Deceased
I heard on the news there were still Americans dying in Iraq. Seems to me that would not be the case if we were actually done there.

0 (not O) gets ZERO credit from me.

dd
 

Warthog

Tusk Up
No! If you think combat operations are ending, then you're fooled. According to what I've been reading, the operations are being contracted out to private armies, in other words mercs. Plus U.S. troops will never leave Iraq or Afghanistan.:ld:
 

Lone Wolf

Lives on TB
Yeah, Bush set a date to shoot at, but he knew all to well that any attempt to maintain a tight withdrawl of troops from there was dicey.

You just don't turn you back on the enimy on the field of battle...unless your o.

This will fcost lives!

lw
 

ambereyes

Veteran Member
From what I understand, special ops are still there.


Yes, they are and still doing what they do. So no the dear leader gets a big no. He has left 50,000 troops there with the Iraq's as their protection, now that is scary.
 

sssarawolf

We're just plugging along.
It ain't over yet.Just watch a debacle unfold.I predict that he'll be sending our soldiers back within the year.The ones remaining won't be enough.I'm not saying whether we should go or stay,but mark my words,this won't end pretty.

Besides,I have yet to see Obama display any competence,ever.

Ditto
 

TheHippie

Veteran Member
3rd ACR arrived in Iraq as of a week ago. If they aren't combat troops, then what is?

This war is still long from over.
 

NoPlugsNM

Deceased
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Withdrawal_of_U.S._troops_from_Iraq


Under this plan, the majority of troops will be withdrawn just a month after the deadline in the signed agreement between former President George W. Bush and Prime Minister of Iraq Nouri al-Maliki where the majority of troops will be withdrawn at one point, and the entirety of troops to be out by December 31, 2011.
..........................
This plan falls almost into perfect alignment with the one signed by President George W. Bush and then prime-minister Nouri Al-Maliki, with the exception of being a month behind, as the majority of troops under that plan were supposed to be withdrawn by June 30th, 2010 with all troops being withdrawn by December 31, 2011

And that's what Obama should get the credit for? Copying GW Bush, a month late?



Actually, 2 months late AND the totality will not be leaving by Dec 31 2011 as planned either - didn't Obama say something about the end of summer next year?? and even then, some will still remain??

I do not see the US putting any troops BACK into Iraq, Obama said it very straight forwardly - Iraq's destiny is now theirs to control, we are done with our part. So, he is letting them, or seeing to it that they have full control. We all know that it will return to the Shiite hole it once was, with all the factions warring as they have done for all the centuries we have recorded writings about them. SOS Iraq, soon SOS Afghanistan, all for not.


NP
 

maric

Short but deadly
The only 'brownie points' that muzzie lover deserves are the ones that float in the toilet after he deficates. And contrary to his belief, they don't smell like the rose garden. :whistle:
 
No, he won't get any credit from me until there are NO MORE US soldiers in the M.E. And come to think of it, brings the rest home from all over BFE and stations on our southern border in full combat regalia.
 

WildDaisy

God has a plan, Trust it!
He didn't end anything. He just stuck to the schedule that was already in place from Bush. Bush was the one that said in August 2010 they would come home.

Does he get a prize for doing nothing? It was already in the works.

So he blames Bush for when things are wrong, but doesn't give Bush the credit when things go right?
 
Top