GUNS/RLTD My Month With A Gun (An AMAZINGLY Stupid Anti-Gun Story)

Dozdoats

Deceased
http://msmagazine.com/blog/2013/06/12/my-month-with-a-gun-week-one/

My Month With a Gun: Week One
June 12, 2013 by Heidi Yewman

My hands are shaking; my adrenaline is surging.

No, it’s not from the latte I just inhaled or because this is the first time in two years I’ve been in a Starbucks since declaring a boycott on its open-carry gun policy.

What’s got me jittery this morning is the 9mm Glock that’s holstered on my hip. Me, lead gun policy protester at the 2010 Starbuck’s shareholder meeting. Me, a board member of the Brady Campaign. Me, the author of a book about the impact of gun violence, Beyond the Bullet.

Yes, I bought a handgun and will carry it everywhere I go over the next 30 days. I have four rules: Carry it with me at all times, follow the laws of my state, only do what is minimally required for permits, licensing, purchasing and carrying, and finally be prepared to use it for protecting myself at home or in public.

Why? Following the Newtown massacre in December, the NRA’s Wayne LaPierre, told the country, “The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.” I wondered what would it be like to be that good guy with a gun? What would it be like to get that gun, live with that gun, be out and about with that gun. Finally, what happens when you don’t want that gun any more?

I decided to find out.

Getting the permit to carry a concealed weapon was simple. I filled out a form, had my fingerprints taken for a background check and paid $56.50. No training required. It took far longer to get my dog a license.

I started my 30-day gun trial with a little window-shopping. I visited a gun show and two gun dealers. I ended up buying a Glock 9mm handgun from Tony, a gun dealer four miles from my house. I settled on this model because it was a smallish gun and because Tony recommended it for my stated purposes of protecting myself and my home.

It was obvious from the way I handled the gun that I knew nothing about firearms. Tony sold it to me anyway. The whole thing took 7 minutes. As a gratified consumer, I thought, “Well, that was easy.” Then the terrifying reality hit me, “Holy hell, that was EASY.” Too easy. I still knew nothing about firearms.

Tony told me a Glock doesn’t have an external safety feature, so when I got home and opened the box and saw the magazine in the gun I freaked. I was too scared to try and eject it as thoughts flooded my mind of me accidentally shooting the gun and a bullet hitting my son in the house or rupturing the gas tank of my car, followed by an earth-shaking explosion. This was the first time my hands shook from the adrenaline surge and the first time I questioned the wisdom of this 30-day experiment.

I needed help. I drove to where a police officer had pulled over another driver. Now, writing this, I realize that rolling up on an on-duty cop with a handgun in tow might not have been fully thought through.

I told him I just bought a gun, had no clue how to use it. I asked him to make sure there were no bullets in the magazine or chamber. He took the magazine out and cleared the chamber. He assured me it was empty and showed me how to look. Then he told me how great the gun was and how he had one just like it.

The cop thought I was an idiot and suggested I take a class. But up to that point I’d done nothing wrong, nothing illegal.

So here I sit at Starbucks, and the irony couldn’t be thicker. On March 12, 2010, I was surrounded by big hairy men with guns on their hips, yelling at me as I led a protest against Starbuck’s gun policy. Today, I’m surrounded by five-year-old boys sitting with their moms at the next table. Now I’m the one with a gun on her hip. The gun makes me more fearful than I could have imagined.

In some way, I feel a certain vindication. I was right to protest Starbucks policy. Today, they have a woman with absolutely no firearms training and a Glock on her hip sitting within arm’s reach of small children, her hands shaking and adrenaline surging.
 

Dozdoats

Deceased
Mas nails it...
===========

http://backwoodshome.com/blogs/Mass...utm_campaign=Feed:+MassadAyoob+(Massad+Ayoob)

Massad Ayoob
« A VERY USEFUL NEW BOOK
FALSE FLAGS, FALSE PREMISES
Monday, June 17th, 2013

More anti-gun strangeness. The anti-gun media salivates over the thought that a gun enthusiast might be trying to kill President Obama, Mayor Bloomberg, et. al. with ricin…until it is discovered that the suspect’s estranged (and just plain strange) wife is the culprit. And whaddaya know, there are indications that she’s vehemently anti-gun. See here: http://weaponsman.com/?p=9018&utm_source=feedly


Meanwhile, an avowed anti-gunner decides that she will arm herself, using all deliberate ignorance and irresponsibility, in hopes of showing that knowledgeable and responsible gun-wearers must be as ignorant and irresponsible as she. Follow the continuing saga of stupidity here:

http://msmagazine.com/blog/2013/06/12/my-month-with-a-gun-week-one/

I haven’t checked the new DSM-5 to see if they’ve categorized neurofeces (shit for brains). However, we seem to already have a couple of poster children for a prevention campaign.
 

Hfcomms

EN66iq
The cop thought I was an idiot and suggested I take a class. But up to that point I’d done nothing wrong, nothing illegal.

She is an idiot. There is something about personal responsibility which the law assumes that most people should have. Apparently she doesn't have any. It's idiocy to know nothing about a firearm and strap it to your hip and walk around with it.

In some way, I feel a certain vindication. I was right to protest Starbucks policy. Today, they have a woman with absolutely no firearms training and a Glock on her hip sitting within arm’s reach of small children, her hands shaking and adrenaline surging.

A vindication? The woman is an idiot and is a danger to herself and those around her. How about getting properly trained before walking around with a firearm.
 

FarmerJohn

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Why is it that people boast about their ignorance?

I don't get it. Was it supposed to be funny to the intended audience?
 

bw

Fringe Ranger
Now, writing this, I realize that rolling up on an on-duty cop with a handgun in tow might not have been fully thought through.

Well, that part was funny.
 

Dozdoats

Deceased
Kudos to dbd.... http://www.daybydaycartoon.com/2013/06/17/

061713.jpg
 

Dennis Olson

Chief Curmudgeon
_______________
Not only should this person not have a firearm, but should be kept far from sharp knives, pointed scissors, hammers, or myriad other implements with which she is obviously incapable of using. Hey, maybe she could find a MAN to show her do to use that stuff properly.....
 

Dozdoats

Deceased
She's open carrying, and she has NO training on retention (or anything else). And she has the cheapest sleaziest nylon holster available to boot - there are various levels of retention type holsters available that LEOs wear, that are far more secure for open carry.

She's basically wandering around in public OFFERING the gun to anyone who wants to take it. And I'd bet she has not one whim of understanding what situational awareness is or why it is important.

This woman is a menace.

Here's the picture from the article, allegedly of her and her gun:

http://msmagazine.com/blog/2013/06/12/my-month-with-a-gun-week-one/img_4057/
 

hypoluxo

Veteran Lurker
I'll bet the car dealer sold her a car without verifying that she was a competent driver or that she never drove while intoxicated. So, her gun dealer, Tony, was supposed to deny a legal sale based on... what?
 

Dennis Olson

Chief Curmudgeon
_______________
My comment ("awaiting moderation". Do you think it will ever show up in the comments?)


People like this are dangerous, and for a variety of reasons. First and foremost, the author got no training. Zero. No gun owner I've met in my ENTIRE LIFE (I'm in my mid 50's) has ever done that. (Last year, after the Aurora shooting incident, I went out and bought my very first AR-pattern rifle. I knew nothing about them, and asked the gunshop owner for a thorough run-through on its operation and maintenance. This run-through took about 45 minutes.) Second, the author's desire here was not to be a responsible gun owner, but to provide self-justification for her fear and loathing of guns. Of course, in that regard, she was eminently successful. Also, I have no idea what state the author lives in, but where I live, to get a CHL license, I was required to not only be fingerprinted and background checked, but I had to spend an entire day at a gun range, in a training course certified by the NRA and state law enforcement. Most of the day was classroom training, with two hours dedicated to shooting the gun. The shooting score had to be high enough to demonstrate competency, and the written score had to be high enough to prove an understanding of the carry and shoot laws of this state. When a person goes into something determined to reinforce their own prejudice and fear, they will ultimately be successful. It would be the same as placing a KKK member into the heart of the ghetto to watch black behavior. At the end of the day, that person would believe that all blacks are bad, just as the author of this piece believes that guns are bad. self-reinforcement of prejudice. This entire essay series is a waste of magazine space.
 

Dozdoats

Deceased
I have four rules: Carry it with me at all times, follow the laws of my state, only do what is minimally required for permits, licensing, purchasing and carrying, and finally be prepared to use it for protecting myself at home or in public.

She didn't even follow her own rules. She is in NO WAY prepared to defend herself, and is in fact a danger to herself and others.

There are four other rules I doubt she has bothered to learn however:

http://thefiringline.com/Misc/safetyrules.html

Jeff Cooper's Rules of Gun Safety

RULE I: ALL GUNS ARE ALWAYS LOADED

RULE II: NEVER LET THE MUZZLE COVER ANYTHING YOU ARE NOT WILLING TO DESTROY

RULE III: KEEP YOUR FINGER OFF THE TRIGGER UNTIL YOUR SIGHTS ARE ON THE TARGET

RULE IV: BE SURE OF YOUR TARGET



RULE I: ALL GUNS ARE ALWAYS LOADED

There are no exceptions. Do not pretend that this is true. Some people and organizations take this rule and weaken it;e.g. "Treat all guns as if they were loaded." Unfortunately, the "as if" compromises the directness of the statement by implying that they are unloaded, but we will treat them as though they are loaded. No good! Safety rules must be worded forcefully so that they are never treated lightly or reduced to partial compliance.

All guns are always loaded - period!

This must be your mind-set. If someone hands you a firearm and says, "Don't worry, it's not loaded," you do not dare believe him. You need not be impolite, but check it yourself. Remember, there are no accidents, only negligent acts. Check it. Do not let yourself fall prey to a situation where you might feel compelled to squeal, "I didn't know it was loaded!"

RULE II: NEVER LET THE MUZZLE COVER ANYTHING YOU ARE NOT WILLING TO DESTROY

Conspicuously and continuously violated, especially with pistols, Rule II applies whether you are involved in range practice, daily carry, or examination. If the weapon is assembled and in someone's hands, it is capable of being discharged. A firearm holstered properly, lying on a table, or placed in a scabbard is of no danger to anyone. Only when handled is there a need for concern. This rule applies to fighting as well as to daily handling. If you are not willing to take a human life, do not cover a person with the muzzle. This rule also applies to your own person. Do not allow the muzzle to cover your extremities, e.g. using both hands to reholster the pistol. This practice is unsound, both procedurally and tactically. You may need a free hand for something important. Proper holster design should provide for one-handed holstering, so avoid holsters which collapse after withdrawing the pistol. (Note: It is dangerous to push the muzzle against the inside edge of the holster nearest the body to "open" it since this results in your pointing the pistol at your midsection.) Dry-practice in the home is a worthwhile habit and it will result in more deeply programmed reflexes. Most of the reflexes involved in the Modern Technique do not require that a shot be fired. Particular procedures for dry-firing in the home will be covered later. Let it suffice for now that you do not dry-fire using a "target" that you wish not to see destroyed. (Recall RULE I as well.)



Rule III: KEEP YOUR FINGER OFF THE TRIGGER UNTIL YOUR SIGHTS ARE ON THE TARGET

Rule III is violated most anytime the uneducated person handles a firearm. Whether on TV, in the theaters, or at the range, people seem fascinated with having their finger on the trigger. Never stand or walk around with your finger on the trigger. It is unprofessional, dangerous, and, perhaps most damaging to the psyche, it is klutzy looking. Never fire a shot unless the sights are superimposed on the target and you have made a conscious decision to fire. Firing an unaligned pistol in a fight gains nothing. If you believe that the defensive pistol is only an intimidation tool - not something to be used - carry blanks, or better yet, reevaluate having one around. If you are going to launch a projectile, it had best be directed purposely. Danger abounds if you allow your finger to dawdle inside the trigger guard. As soon as the sights leave the target, the trigger-finger leaves the trigger and straightens alongside the frame. Since the hand normally prefers to work as a unit - as in grasping - separating the function of the trigger-finger from the rest of the hand takes effort. The five-finger grasp is a deeply programmed reflex. Under sufficient stress, and with the finger already placed on the trigger, an unexpected movement, misstep or surprise could result in a negligent discharge. Speed cannot be gained from such a premature placement of the trigger-finger. Bringing the sights to bear on the target, whether from the holster or the Guard Position, takes more time than that required for moving the trigger finger an inch or so to the trigger.



RULE IV: BE SURE OF YOUR TARGET

Know what it is, what is in line with it, and what is behind it. Never shoot at anything you have not positively identified. Be aware of your surroundings, whether on the range or in a fight. Do not assume anything. Know what you are doing.



SUMMARY:

Make these rules a part of your character. Never compromise them. Improper gunhandling results from ignorance and improper role modeling, such as handling your gun like your favorite actor does. Education can cure this. You can make a difference by following these gunhandling rules and insisting that those around you do the same. Set the example. Who knows what tragedies you, or someone you influence, may prevent?
 

Hognutz

TB Fanatic
Ha! That woman is proud of her ignorance. Gotta love folks like that.....They are the majority nowadays....
 

Garryowen

Deceased
I needed help. I drove to where a police officer had pulled over another driver. Now, writing this, I realize that rolling up on an on-duty cop with a handgun in tow might not have been fully thought through.

Nothing you have done as indicated in this article was even superficially "thought through." Does anyone actually believe anything this writer produces?
 

Publius

On TB every waking moment
Yes, we have people that buy things and have no clue of how to use it, her great, great, great grandmother probably packed a cap & ball pistol and knew how to use it before she bought it.

As for classes, well we make everyone go threw tests to drive a car and they still run into other cars and other things. In this day and age we also have people that need instruction & training on how to operate a bowling ball.
 

Dozdoats

Deceased
No, it’s not from the latte I just inhaled or because this is the first time in two years I’ve been in a Starbucks since declaring a boycott on its open-carry gun policy.
 

kyrsyan

Has No Life - Lives on TB
BTW, they are editing/deleting comments that they don't approve of. Just a heads up.
 

m.anderson

Veteran Member
She thought the gun she just bought was sold to her chambered and ready to go. Really?
She wasn't watching when Tony showed (should have) her the gun was empty before
he handed it to her?
I bet anything she never even load a mag up.
Are there really any states that will give you a CWP without at least an NRA course?
 

Hognutz

TB Fanatic
When I got my Concealed License, I had to take an 8 hour coarse and actually shoot and hit a target. My Wife took it with me and am proud she did a good job on safety and shooting.
 

Dare7

Inactive
She thought the gun she just bought was sold to her chambered and ready to go. Really?
She wasn't watching when Tony showed (should have) her the gun was empty before
he handed it to her?
I bet anything she never even load a mag up.
Are there really any states that will give you a CWP without at least an NRA course?
Indiana
 

ar10shooter

Inactive
Your comment is awaiting moderation.

I can’t really believe anyone who is defending this incredibly stupid act. This is like a person who believes their should be stricter D.U.I. Laws, drinking a case of beer and hitting the road to prove it too easy to drink and drive. Granted she didn’t break any laws but putting herself and others in harms way by being untrained and playing with a gun is equally stupid.



I don't know if they will post mine either but I am truly amazed at the stupidity of some people.
 

Millwright

Knuckle Dragger
_______________
The true tragedy of this story:

She has kids that will perpetuate this mindset.

The effect of these generational morons have on our country will be cubic as they interbreed.
 

Hognutz

TB Fanatic
The true tragedy of this story:

She has kids that will perpetuate this mindset.

The effect of these generational morons have on our country will be cubic as they interbreed.

Naw they will all change their minds about guns just as soon as the Race war begins in earnest. Stoopid liberals will be begging for a gun as soon as Tyrone is kicking in the door, lickin' his lips.;)
 

Millwright

Knuckle Dragger
_______________
Naw they will all change their minds about guns just as soon as the Race war begins in earnest. Stoopid liberals will be begging for a gun as soon as Tyrone is kicking in the door, lickin' his lips.;)

AYUP!

Every time I read about a foaming at the mouth rabid anti gunner, I have a fantasy....snatch them out of their little utopia and drop them in south Chicongo (credit Shinmen) and ask them if they want a gun to carry as they try to walk out of such a "diverse" area.:lkick:
 

securitysix

Senior Member
Then so credit card companies should be responsible to teach responsibility to who they give a new card to will always pay it off when supposed to and never ever top it out and get in debt. There should be a law that no idiots should never recieve such a bad thing.
 

Foothiller

Veteran Member
Today, I’m surrounded by five-year-old boys sitting with their moms at the next table. Now I’m the one with a gun on her hip. The gun makes me more fearful than I could have imagined.


How does an inert object endanger anybody. Liberals like this woman scare me.

Because they can't seem to imagine holding a firearm and not killing innocents with it.

I think they're projecting when they say things like "I don't trust you (me) with a gun". They imagine that because I may have a firearm that I'll just start shooting people when I get mad.

Obviously I don't do that.

But they project that onto me (and other gun owners) because they evidently can't imagine THEMSELVES with lethal tools in their hand, because they can't imagine NOT shooting people who piss them off for any reason.

THAT is scary. Sociopaths and psychopaths are scary and I think many liberals are just that.

They are fine with some cop kicking my door in and stealing my property just so they can feel safer. Because they can't trust themselves with lethal tools, they don't trust others, like me. This despite my history of shooting ZERO people. Ever.

Last time I checked, they don't have a consitutional right to feel safe. I however, do have an inalienable right to defend my life and liberty as needed.

Liberals gun grabbers are the worst sorts of psychopaths IMO.
 

ar10shooter

Inactive
I don know why this continues to bug me so much. This article is just insanity stupid I wrote another response the 3rd on I'm sure they won't post it, but I have to say something. Tell me what you think of this reply



Your comment is awaiting moderation.

I’m sure this will not be posted as I have nothing to say about how some 2a advocate is missing the point, or how courageous the author is, I have also written two replies as to the moronic argument of this artical. So the author can do something down right stupid and their for everyone can, and the only way to chane that is mandatory training.
According to the CDC between 2005 and 2009 their were 3880 fatal unintentional drownings, mostly from back yard pools. Between 2005 and 2010 just under 3800 people were accidentally killed by a firearm. More people died in 5 years from accidental drowning then in 6 years in firearm accidents, yet the number of households with firearm are over 4 times the number of households with swimming pools. Should we require everyone with a swimming pool in their backyard to have lifeguard training? If the goal of the author was not selfserving and politically motivated and actually about saving innocent lives we would be talking about swimming pools.
People die from accidents with firearms, that is true and every death is a tradgedy, people drown in backyard pools, those are tradgeties, and innocent people are killed by others with ill intent. Firearms have saved lives. the only thing that gives an elderly lady or a pregnant woman a chance at life when a 250 attacker is intent on killing her, is a firearm. Don’t suggest she should not have that right. Don’t suggest traing should be (required) because you are daft enough to carry a firearm without training, therefore suggesting everyone is equally daft. We are a country of rights, rights like free speech, or the right to defend ones life, with a firearm if needed. Start putting conditions on those rights, and we are on a very slippery slope to not having any rights.
Now print that and prove you do care about the right to free speech even when you disagree.
Thank you
Daniel Levings
 

TeapotTempest

Turbulent Teakettle
Wonder how one "conceals" a $10 Blackhawk! holster.

I would assume it's just for the pic, but this woman's choices are beyond unwise, so...
 

Dozdoats

Deceased
kyrsyan,

THANKS for the update... here's the piece:
===================

http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/2013/06/24/ms-magazine-pulls-plug-on-my-month-with-a-gun-blog/

Ms. Magazine Pulls Plug on ‘My Month with A Gun’ Blog
june 24, 2013 by jeff leave a comment

Ms. Magazine editor Michele Kort has apparently decided to pull the plug on Heidi Yewman’s three part ‘My Month with A Gun’ blog because “gun blogs” had discovered series and were highly critical of Ms. Yewman’s actions:

“So, Heidi,” began the email to Heidi Yewman from Michele Kort, her editor at Ms. Magazine. “I wanted to let you know that, in the comments to the gun-nut post below, someone put your address out there. I’ve been super careful NOT to approve any comments that mentioned where you might live.”

Yewman, a freelance writer, had written a three-part blog post for Ms. about buying a gun and carrying it everywhere she went. Yewman was clearly on the gun control side of the debate, and it’s fair to say that her posts were intended to show that it was far too easy for just about anybody to carry a gun just about anywhere. But, Kort went on to say, the comments Ms. Magazine had received were almost entirely from pro-gun advocates, and she and the small staff at Ms. were overwhelmed. Instead of leading to a high-minded debate about guns, her blog post had instead attracted insults and vituperation, and a clearly stated desire for “payback.” Other gun blogs had picked up Yewman’s post to mock it or insult it, with many commenters suggesting that the police in her hometown be called about what she was doing. Inevitably, somebody discovered—and posted—Yewman’s address.

Ok, first of all, posting Ms. Yewman’s home address and/or threatening her or Ms. Magazine: Not Cool. Not acceptable. Period.

Second, contrary to what New York Times claims the NRA didn’t defeat Ms. Yewman or Ms. Magazine – common sense did.

Look there is no requirement for someone in Washington State to complete any kind firearms training before applying for or obtaining a concealed carry license. All you have to do is show up, submit your paperwork, pay the processing fee and wait for your application to be processed.

Which is what Ms. Yewman did. She complied with the letter of law but, in doing so, ignored the moral and ethical responsibilities that come with firearms ownership.

Let me repeat that: The decision to own and carry firearm comes with tremendous moral and ethical responsibilities, simply complying with the letter of the law is not enough. You have a moral and ethical obligation to get proper training, period. Simply put, walking around with a gun on you hip and no training at all, like Ms. Yewman, is the height of irresponsibility. You’re a danger to yourself and others.

Look I get that gun control advocates like Ms. Yewman have this lopsided caricature of the NRA and gun owners in their minds that is completely detached from reality, but can we please cut through the bullshit… The NRA has, since its inception, advocated for responsible gun ownership and through a network of thousands of instructors offers training courses that teach gun owners how to safely use the tool with which they’ve chosen to defend themselves.

H/T: Jonn Lilyea, This ain’t Hell

Edit: I forgot to mention The Huffington Post will be publishing parts two and three of Ms. Yewman’s blog.
 

Dozdoats

Deceased
http://thisainthell.us/blog/?p=36375

Dingus with a gun disarmed
June 23rd, 2013

Charles sends us a link to the New York Times “The Gun Report” which recounts the discussion between dingus Heidi Yewman, who we discussed last week, and her editor, Michele Kort at Ms. Magazine, because “gun blogs” had discovered her series of articles about how she was an untrained gun owner and endangering everyone within at least 25 yards of her;

What was Kort’s solution to this dilemma? Incredibly, it was to kill the rest of Yewman’s series. “I don’t think I should post the next two installments of this—they’ll only fire up the troops again, and we’re just not equipped to handle this on our blog,” Kort wrote. When I reached out to Kort, suggesting that Ms. had allowed itself to be censored by Second Amendment absolutists, she would not respond on the record. Suffice it to say that Ms. disagrees with this assessment. But I don’t see how you could view it in any other way. Ms. published something the N.R.A.-types didn’t like; they responded by bullying Ms. online, and Ms. folded.

N.R.A. 1, Ms. Magazine, 0. Here is today’s report.

Um, yeah, no, the NRA didn’t defeat Ms. Yewman or her magazine – common sense beat her. All of us who are in the least bit controversial and incite enemies has had our addresses posted on the internet – that’s why some of us have guns and CCW permits. It hasn’t affected us or our public opinions in the least. The point remains, and the NRA has always said, that gun owners need to be responsible and learn how to use the tool with which they’ve chosen to defend themselves.

Ms. Yewman was a huge threat to her community. I, for one, feel safer knowing that she gave up the the idiot point that she was trying to make. No one I know has ever bought a gun without knowing how to load it or fire it effectively. Yewman thought that by becoming her perception of the stereotypical brainless gun owner that she was making a legitimate point, when if fact, she was making our point – gun owners need to be responsible or go home. If the NRA won anything, and if the NRA had anything to do with Ms. canceling the series, they got one careless gun owner off the streets with her gun.

By the way, the NRA didn’t send me the article and demand that I make it the Big Issue last week, one of my readers sent the article, like they send everything I write about here. So suck it, New York Times.
 

Dozdoats

Deceased
http://nocera.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/06/21/the-gun-report-june-21-2013/?_r=3

June 21, 2013, 12:12 pm
The Gun Report: June 21, 2013

“So, Heidi,” began the email to Heidi Yewman from Michele Kort, her editor at Ms. Magazine. “I wanted to let you know that, in the comments to the gun-nut post below, someone put your address out there. I’ve been super careful NOT to approve any comments that mentioned where you might live.”

Yewman, a freelance writer, had written a three-part blog post for Ms. about buying a gun and carrying it everywhere she went. Yewman was clearly on the gun control side of the debate, and it’s fair to say that her posts were intended to show that it was far too easy for just about anybody to carry a gun just about anywhere. But, Kort went on to say, the comments Ms. Magazine had received were almost entirely from pro-gun advocates, and she and the small staff at Ms. were overwhelmed. Instead of leading to a high-minded debate about guns, her blog post had instead attracted insults and vituperation, and a clearly stated desire for “payback.” Other gun blogs had picked up Yewman’s post to mock it or insult it, with many commenters suggesting that the police in her hometown be called about what she was doing. Inevitably, somebody discovered—and posted—Yewman’s address.

What was Kort’s solution to this dilemma? Incredibly, it was to kill the rest of Yewman’s series. “I don’t think I should post the next two installments of this—they’ll only fire up the troops again, and we’re just not equipped to handle this on our blog,” Kort wrote. When I reached out to Kort, suggesting that Ms. had allowed itself to be censored by Second Amendment absolutists, she would not respond on the record. Suffice it to say that Ms. disagrees with this assessment. But I don’t see how you could view it in any other way. Ms. published something the N.R.A.-types didn’t like; they responded by bullying Ms. online, and Ms. folded.

N.R.A. 1, Ms. Magazine, 0. Here is today’s report.

—Joe Nocera

A 12-year-old boy who was accidentally shot by his brother in their Geneva, Ind., home Monday night has died. The victim was shot once in the head by his 16-year-old brother, who was moving a .22 caliber rifle when it discharged. The prosecutor will determine if any charges will be filed, but the sheriff’s department says that most likely won’t happen.

—WHAS11.com

A 17-year-old boy is dead after a possibly gang-related shooting in Wilmington, N.C., early Thursday. After hearing 10 shots ring out, a neighbor opened his front door and saw the body of Jeffrey Henry, 17, face down in his front yard between some trash cans. Police found a second man with a bullet in his leg hiding in a nearby backyard.

—WWAY3

Anne Christine McGuirt, 58, was shot to death by her son in The Woodlands, Tex., Thursday afternoon. The girlfriend of Stuart J. McGuirt, 37, ran into a nearby business and said she had watched him kill his mother. Deputies found Anne McGuirt’s body in a downstairs room. Stuart McGuirt was taken into custody and will be charged with murder.

—Houston Chronicle

Addarren Ross, an 18-year-old rapper who went by the name Lil Snupe, was shot and killed in Winnfield, La., early Thursday. Officers responded to calls of a shooting at the Maplewood Apartments, where they found Ross shot twice in the torso. Police are searching for a person of interest. The rapper had been signed by Meek Mill’s Dreamchasers imprint late last year.

—MTV News

Two men are dead after what appears to be a murder-suicide in Peacham, Vt. 50-year-old Mark Peabody, a former elementary school principal, left his house to meet his wife’s ex-husband, 59-year-old John Jackson, in the driveway. Peabody was shot and killed, and Jackson went inside the house and shot and killed himself. A bomb squad investigated a suspicious package found inside Jackson’s vehicle.

—WCAX.xom

Daniel Raber, 53, was hospitalized after his 76-year-old father-in-law shot him in the stomach during an argument in Billings, Mont., Wednesday evening. No arrests have been made because police were still looking into who the instigator was and whether the shooting was in self-defense.

—Billings Gazette

Anthony Jerard Jones, 29, was killed and a 32-year-old woman was injured during a drug deal in Baton Rouge, La., early Thursday. 29-year-old Jermaine Ruffen is suspected of shooting the victims, with whom he was engaged in an illegal drug transaction, and fleeing. The handgun Ruffen threw away as he fled the scene was a stolen New Orleans Police Department service weapon.

—Nola.com

Two adults and a teenager were shot in a car near the Clay Wade Bailey Bridge in downtown Cincinnati, Ohio, Wednesday night. One vehicle pulled up next to another and fired multiple shots, injuring Dequinn Little and Darion Jackson, both 23, along with a 15-year-old boy. The victims say the incident resulted from an ongoing dispute.

—Fox19

A man was shot in the leg during a firefight at an Augusta, Ga., mobile home park Thursday afternoon. Two men got into an argument in the street, and as they began to fight a woman walked out of the home and started shooting. One of the men then pulled a gun of his own and began firing. A bullet hit the victim in the leg. It’s the second shooting in the area in two weeks.

—WRDW-TV

A man was injured and another was arrested after a shooting near a Riverview, Fla., convenience store early Thursday. George Nelson Jr., 51, and Michael Sheppard Jr., 40, were arguing over a woman when Nelson pulled out a .38-caliber revolver and shot Sheppard through the windshield of his car. Nelson faces attempted murder and aggravated battery charges.

—Tampa Bay Times

An 18-year-old man was injured in a robbery and shooting in Fairfax County, Va., Wednesday night. The incident began when a 17-year-old boy was approached by four acquaintances, who demanded that he turn over his cell phone. The group then confronted another 17-year-old boy, who pulled out a handgun and started shooting. A bullet hit the victim, who was waiting in a nearby vehicle. The shooter was arrested.

—WTOP

A 17-year-old boy and a 21-year-old man were injured in a double shooting in Hopewell, Va., Wednesday night. Police said they found a large amount of narcotics and a firearm at the scene.

—CBS6

A gunman opened fire on three people standing in front of a Stockton, Calif., home Thursday afternoon. The shooter stood outside his car and opened fire, hitting a man and a woman.

—CBS Sacramento

According to Slate’s gun-death tracker, an estimated 5,207 people have died as a result of gun violence in America since the Newtown massacre on December 14, 2012.
 

Dozdoats

Deceased
http://thisainthell.us/blog/?p=36275

Beware: there’s a dingus with a gun out there
June 17th, 2013

This link was on my Facebook thingie written by Heidi Yewman, one of those anti-gun nuts who think they can make a point by acting like their perception of people they don’t understand. Heidi, like I said, doesn’t like people owning guns, so she goes out and buys a gun and all of the attendant paperwork that goes along with that and then carries the gun in public. She’s such a ditz that she pulls over a cop to learn how to operate her gun, because she says she is going to “only do what is minimally required for permits, licensing, purchasing and carrying, and finally be prepared to use it for protecting myself at home or in public”. Now, I’m not sure where she lives, but she bought the gun with no training and strapped it on with no training. Like I said, she didn’t bother to ask the dealer how to use the gun she’s carrying, so she stopped a cop and asked him because she freaked out after she got home and took it out of the box – a Glock 9mm.

So the article opens with her sitting in Starbucks with her gun, shaking nervously near children, I guess because the gun might just jump out of the holster and start putting kids down on it’s own.

Her feeling is that everyone is just like her – no training on how to handle firearms and monstrously stupid. Responsible gun owners know or learn how to handle their firearm before they buy it, certainly before they carry it in public. No one tell Heidi this, because she won’t listen, but the NRA offers firearms safety classes.

Actually, I’ve read the article a couple of times and the only thing that I can figure Heidi wants to do is accidentally shoot someone because she’s doing her best in that regard. The thing is, there are millions of gun owners who carry a weapon in public who don’t shoot people everyday because they didn’t do “what is minimally required” to own the gun.

Heidi is an irresponsible twit who I hope doesn’t shoot herself, but that’s what she deserves.
 

Dennis Olson

Chief Curmudgeon
_______________
According to Slate’s gun-death tracker, an estimated 5,207 people have died as a result of gun violence...

About 4500 of those in ChiCongo....
 
Top