EDUC Gender Bender Day causes trouble at Tippecanoe

Ben Sunday

Has No Life - Lives on TB
http://fox6now.com/2013/05/24/gender-bender-day-causes-controversy-at-tippecanoe/

Another attempt at misdirection from the homos, pedophiles and other garbage advocating sexual indoctrination...imo.



..Gender Bender Day causes controversy at TippecanoePosted on: 5:11 pm, May 24, 2013, by Myra Sanchick, updated on: 05:12pm, May 24, 2013
..
MILWAUKEE (WITI) — Students at Tippecanoe School have participated in several different theme days during School Spirit Week, but Friday, May 23rd’s theme of Gender Bender Day caused some controversy.

Members of the Student Council decided on day’s theme. It called for boys to dress like girls and girls to dress like boys.

“I was speechless actually, and I asked a few of the neighbors because I thought I was overreacting, stuff like that, and everybody was speechless,” said one mother, who asked not to be identified.

The mother says she has no problem with teenagers having a fun day of dressing like the opposite sex, but her son is only seven and the theme confused him. She, as well as a few other parents, chose to keep their kids home on Friday.

Milwaukee Public Schools says participation is 100 percent voluntary, however after some parental complaints, the name of the theme was changed to Switch It Up Day.

One student’s father, who didn’t want to be identified, says he doesn’t want his son to dress as a girl.
“I think it’s just teaching them the wrong lesson about gender. If you’re a boy, stay a boy. You shouldn’t have something like that at school,” said the father.

School board member Terrence Falk believes those creating a controversy are using the kids for political purposes.
“This is nothing new. I don’t think they kids were thinking about sexual orientation,” said Falk.

FOX6 News didn’t find any kids who showed up to school dressed like the opposite sex. It turns out mostly teachers and other staff members had the Switch It Up spirit.

Agree
0
Disagree
0
Must read
0
Important
0
Inspiring
0

..Filed in: NewsTopics: gender bender day, school spirit, switch it up day, Tippecanoe
.
Powered by WordPress.com VIPCopyright © 2013, WITI
.
 
Last edited:

Mixin

Veteran Member
How odd!!

The mother said her child is only 7 years old; yet the student council decided this.
 
Wussification of the student bodies.

Serves no useful purpose - and a waste of precious school time...but that's probably no longer an issue with Outcome Based 'Education' where 2 + 2 = 5 is "good enough"
and a "nice try".
 

Bumblepuff

Has No Life - Lives on TB
The mother says she has no problem with teenagers having a fun day of dressing
like the opposite sex, but her son is only seven and the theme confused him.
.
.
.


tutu-gorilla-250x370.jpg
........................
man-ponytails-400x310.jpg


............................................................................... "I'm an adult, but this theme confuses me, too!"
 

LtPiper

Taking cover
Wow. When I was in high school 30 years ago these themed days weren't a problem. Matter of fact we had the starting lineup of the football team in full drag as cheerleaders on pep rallys.
 

Libbybear

Inactive
My feeling is that if girls want to dress like boys, then join the school band and wear a band uniform and march in parades or at half-time in the football games. If the boys want to dress a bit like girls, take home ec and learn to cook and wear aprons and such.

No young children should be made to cross dress. If I had a child, I would home-school them. The schools are now teaching that George Washington was a terrorist as were those at the Boston Tea Party, that Islam is the religion to belong to and that everyone should be homosexual or bi-sexual, and other stuff like this. There are no morals being taught anymore.
 

rodeorector

Global Moderator
They need to fire the principal, vice principals, and any teachers that were involved in planning this. Clean house before it's too late.
 

JamestheFin

Inactive
Remember the furor over this story last month?

Middle School Anti-Bullying Lesson Includes Lesbian Role Play

Young girls at a New York middle school were instructed to ask one another for a lesbian kiss and boys were given guidance on how to tell if women are sluts during an anti-bullying presentation on gender identity and sexual orientation, angry parents allege.
Link: http://radio.foxnews.com/toddstarne...llying-lesson-includes-lesbian-role-play.html

Look, these types of ideas aren't new. In fact, they've been floating around for quite some time. For Feminism-which is gender-based Marxism, one of the pillars is the social legitimization of female promiscuity. Read 1st, 2nd, and 3rd wave feminists-that premise is there.

However, Feminism isn't alone in its goal to undermine realities of gender and sexual orientation. Those ideas harken mainly from the Frankfurt School( of Marxism) of whom some members sought to reduce gender and sexual orientation down to Marxist economic terms so as to prepare people to accept political and economic Marxism.

I present Herbert Marcuse from the Frankfurt School and his book 'Eros & Civilization';

"But the liberation from this state seems to require, not the arrest of alienation, but its consummation, not the reactivation of the repressed and productive personality, but its abolition. The elimination of human potentialities from the world of (alienated) labor creates the preconditions for the elimination of labor from human potentialities."

What Marcuse argued for is "liberating" men and women from their traditional and natural sexual (and in his view inherently capitalist) roles as a way for them to embrace economic Marxism down the road. It's not conspiracy, it's philosophy.



More from 'Eros & Civilization', Chapter 10;

"In the societal relations, reification would be reduced as the division of labor became reoriented on the purification of freely developing individual needs; whereas, the libidinal relations, the taboo on the reification of the body would be lessened.
No longer used as a full·instrument of labor, the body would be resexualized.

Regression involved in this spread of the libido would best manifest itself in a reactivation of all erotogenic zones consequently, in a resurgence of pregenital polyamorous sexuality and in a decline of genital supremacy. The body in its entirety would become an object of cathexis, a thing to be enjoyed- an instrument of pleasure. This change in the value and scope of libidinal relations would lend to a disintegration of the institutions in which...interpersonal relations have been organized, particularly, the monogamic and patriarchal family."

Remember this last sentence because it is one of the pre-eminent goals of the Cultural Marxist bastard ideologies of Queer Theory, Feminism, and Sex-Positivism.

Perhaps it's best to quote from the rather Aldous Huxley:

In a little grassy bay between tall clumps of Mediterranean heather, two children, a little boy of about seven and a little girl who might have been a year older, were playing, very gravely and with all the focussed attention of scientists intent on a labour of discovery, a rudimentary sexual game.

“Charming, charming!” the D.H.C. repeated sentimentally.

“From a neighbouring shrubbery emerged a nurse, leading by the hand a small boy, who howled as he went. An anxious-looking little girl trotted at her heels.

“What’s the matter?” asked the Director.

The nurse shrugged her shoulders. “Nothing much,” she answered. “It’s just that this little boy seems rather reluctant to join in the ordinary erotic play. I’d noticed it once or twice before. And now again to-day. He started yelling just now …”

“Honestly,” put in the anxious-looking little girl, “I didn’t mean to hurt him or anything. Honestly.”

“Of course you didn’t, dear,” said the nurse reassuringly. “And so,” she went on, turning back to the Director, “I’m taking him in to see the Assistant Superintendent of Psychology. Just to see if anything’s at all abnormal.”

“Quite right,” said the Director. “Take him in. You stay here, little girl,” he added, as the nurse moved away with her still howling charge. “What’s your name?”

“Polly Trotsky.”

“And a very good name too,” said the Director. “Run away now and see if you can find some other little boy to play with.”

The child scampered off into the bushes and was lost to sight.

“Exquisite little creature!” said the Director, looking after her. Then, turning to his students, “What I’m going to tell you now,” he said, “may sound incredible. But then, when you’re not accustomed to history, most facts about the past do sound incredible.”

He let out the amazing truth. For a very long period before the time of Our Ford, and even for some generations afterwards, erotic play between children had been regarded as abnormal (there was a roar of laughter); and not only abnormal, actually immoral (no!): and had therefore been rigorously suppressed.

A look of astonished incredulity appeared on the faces of his listeners. Poor little kids not allowed to amuse themselves? They could not believe it.

“Even adolescents,” the D.H.C. was saying, “even adolescents like yourselves …”

“Not possible!”

“Barring a little surreptitious auto-erotism and homosexuality—absolutely nothing.”

“Nothing?”

“In most cases, till they were over twenty years old.”

“Twenty years old?” echoed the students in a chorus of loud disbelief.

“Twenty,” the Director repeated. “I told you that you’d find it incredible.”

From Huxley’s Foreword:

As political and economic freedom diminishes, sexual freedom tends compensatingly to increase. And the dictator (unless he needs cannon fodder and families with which to colonize empty or conquered territories) will do well to encourage that freedom. In conjunction with the freedom to daydream under the influence of dope and movies and the radio, it will help to reconcile his subjects to the servitude which is their fate.

Welcome to our Brave New World where the Left wants your children.
 
Top