It wasn't me who elected Obama.
It was people who voted for him, or voted for someone who had no chance of winning, or didn't vote at all, who elected Barack Obama.
It is these same people who made sure we got Obamacare with absolutely no chance of repeal.
Mountain, I can understand your thinking that we might as well get it over with and get the collapse started now instead of later, but then that's pretty easy to say when you're living in India.
To those who didn't vote, I would say that life is full of choices. The choices are not always between black and white. Sometimes people DO have to choose between two choices, neither of which are good, but one of which is better than the other.
That's real life. People who haven't yet learned to recognize that are like little children who haven't yet learned to face reality and are still living in fantasy land.
Our country is like a person with a cancer. You can either go to Dr Obama/Kavorkian who has a 100% fatality rate, or Dr Romney who has a less than 40% long term cure rate, or Dr Paul who pushes Apricot pit therapy in a Mexican clinic with no documented cure rate, or you can go sit home and refuse to believe you have cancer.
Not voting is like sitting home and refusing to believe you have cancer. Either way you play right into Dr Obama/Kevorkian's plan.
I heard--and still hear---a lot of folks on this forum saying, "oh, we COULDN'T vote for 'xxx", because 'the lesser of 2 evils is STILL evil' "; but somehow those same people can't seem to see that what they actually DID do is that they DID (repeat DID) vote FOR EVIL---by casting a vote they KNEW would probably result in O's re-election.
Then they try to justify that in 2 ways---either by saying, well, at least I didn't vote (directly) for anyone 'evil' ", OR they say, "Well, it's actually a GOOD thing that the truly EVIL man did get elected, because then everyone will see the light and revolt and our country will go back to being the paradise it was in (name your date---1776, 1950's, per-Civil War, whatever)."
WHAT are you folks DRINKING?
Look around you---look at the sheer NUMBERS of gibsmedats, illegal aliens, and clueless Demoncrats, along with the (bless them) overly-trusting and totally uninformed elderly remnants of the WWII generation who think all Democrats are still like Roosevelt (and see him as a savior, not the closet Socialist he was as well)----and TELL ME HOW IT IS you think that THESE people---who VASTLY outnumber those of us who "get it"---are EVER going to "see the light", much less "revolt"???? Heck no, THEY are the sheep that will simply keep believing whatever the chocolate messiah tells them, all the way to the cliff, the shearing floor, and the butchering house right behind it.
That kind of thinking is akin to thinking, "Well, if we just let the DEVIL win, why----of course EVERYONE will SEE how bad the DEVIL is and will rise up and fight him"---but don't you see, can't you see, that by just LETTING the "DEVIL" win---
you have ALLIED yourselves with him--or at least ENABLED him???
"He who is not against us is for us", Jesus said at one point----but remember this applies to Jesus' enemy, SATAN, as well.
By "allowing" a Satanic man to win---by WHATEVER means he did so, and by WHATEVER justification you give it---you gave AID to SATAN to get his man in there----so this "lesser of 2 evils" stuff doesn't even apply, for in this case INACTION = SUPPORT for the DEVIL'S candidate---and "he who is not against us is for us" works BOTH ways---for SATAN as well as for Jesus.
The very thing you purists are accusing "us" pragmatists of---of compromising with the enemy---is in actuality what you HAVE done---in spades---by your INACTION that allowed this evil man to win.
Remember the old saw about pointing fingers?
Better check in which direction your other 3 fingers are pointing...