smarten up, people. only one point of view is allowed here
smarten up, people. only one point of view is allowed here
Sorry, learn what PEER REVIEWED scientific studies are. This is crap.
Then back up your claim instead of posting biased "articles" you seem to think are scientific studies.
Give us proof. I'll change my mind.
ref: post #29 by and for nomadcrna
Your Cancer Progress links were written by ASCO
ASCO Annual Report -2011
http://read.uberflip.com/i/60226
Annual Reports and Financial Information
ASCO's Annual Report offers yearly insight into how the Society fulfills its mission to provide lifelong learning for oncology professionals, increase access to quality cancer care, enhance the global network of oncology expertise, and educate patients with cancer. It focuses on new initiatives and accomplishments and offers brief descriptions of programs in development. Information on the structure of the Society, vital statistics, and a statement of revenue, expenses, and net assets is also included.
Read the 2012 ASCO Annual Report as an enhanced PDF. iPad users can read the Report via ASCO's iLibrary app (sign in with member username and password will be required).
the people you listed dont produce or research anything. They are a clearing house for information to the tune of $80Million dollars per year.
Your remark was content-free. And unimaginative.
Try again, perhaps with some content.
You want proof, but you will NEVER believe any "proof" of anything unless it is from your buddies (death cultists) in "peer" reviewed studies. Personally, I don't believe anything your "peers" say. Why should I? Their and your system of health care is robbing, torturing and murdering tens of thousands every year, in league with the pharmaceuticals, of course. Truth is, many, many of your death cultist colleagues belong in prison. And especially, the psychopaths in the governing bodies who regulate these murderers.
I read recently that a study of the scientific literature and research on cancer is "inherently flawed and not reproducable" . 89% of 53 "peer" reviewed papers were this way. Fraudulent. And, importantly, many of these "studies" were considered "landmark". It isn't just the bankers and politicians who belong in prison. Stated a second time for emphasis. And you can't say that this is exactly news either. It is more an example of the ongoing corruption within the "industry". imo. BTW. The peers who published this study are exempt from previous aspersions of your "brand" of medicine being a death cult.
link for article referenced in previous paragraph.
http://www.naturalnews.com/040230_cancer_research_false_conclusions.html#ixzz2SgwX8CbR
Sources for this article include:
http://www.uofmhealth.org
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v485/n7396/full/485041e.html
http://www.greenmedinfo.com
http://www.cancer.org
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23277767
I just checked http://curezone.com/ and there are 22,464 people online there. Sundays seems to have more people online line than during the week, but overall, there is never any less than 10,000 on that website, 24/7. And why do you supposed there are so many people going to that site? Because allopathy sucks big time and people are looking for answers, that you and your death cult peers do not have.
Sooner or later, change is going to have to happen within the allopathic death cult. It is just too corrupt and too dangerous for society, to continue much longer. It is robbing, torturing and killing too many people.
Death cult, psychopaths, murderers, frauds. This is what you defend and thus, are a part of.
It's a death cult.
A note to all people who will view this thread. Isn't it interesting that the pro-allopathic posters (cut and prescribe types) have chosen, as a group, to ignore my posts. Apparently, they cannot articulate a valid defense to my points of fact, so they have chosen to pretend my statements do not exist.
They are quick to jump on any naturopathic or homeopathic threads and denigrate them. I ask again, why don't they start their own threads about how great the allopathic field is instead of attacking these threads?
TRUTH...If a woman drinks 2 glasses of green tea per day and eats 1 mushroom or any type she will DECREASE HER CHANCES OF BREAST CANCER BY 85%. That is an amazing figure and Doctors do not tell or know it.....Ladies PLEASE DRINK GREEN TEA & EAT A MUSHROOM A DAY!

TRUTH...If a woman drinks 2 glasses of green tea per day and eats 1 mushroom or any type she will DECREASE HER CHANCES OF BREAST CANCER BY 85%. That is an amazing figure and Doctors do not tell or know it.....Ladies PLEASE DRINK GREEN TEA & EAT A MUSHROOM A DAY!
Please, by all means, post your reference for this statement.
I would love it if it were true.
BUT, you understand why as a health care provider, I can't take it just because I heard it on the internet.![]()
Please, by all means, post your reference for this statement.
I would love it if it were true.
BUT, you understand why as a health care provider, I can't take it just because I heard it on the internet.![]()
LOL. Really? This the best you got?
So this timeline is incorrect? It is very easy to check. Please do!
Instead of attacking the messenger as so many do when they don't have an argument or can't intelligently discuss something, prove the information in the timeline wrong!
It is pretty simple. You stated that chemo has not changed in 60 years. Refute what I posted. Any reasonable adult knows your statement is BS without even looking.
Please, by all means, post your reference for this statement.
I would love it if it were true.
BUT, you understand why as a death[ health] care provider, I can't take it just because I heard it on the internet.![]()