HEALTH Marijuana: The next diabetes drug?

dieseltrooper

Inactive
http://www.cnn.com/2013/05/23/health/time-marijuana-diabetes/index.html
(TIME.com) -- Toking up may help marijuana users to stay slim and lower their risk of developing diabetes, according to the latest study, which suggests that cannabis compounds may help in controlling blood sugar.
Although marijuana has a well-deserved reputation for increasing appetite via what stoners call "the munchies," the new research, which was published in the American Journal of Medicine, is not the first to find that the drug has a two-faced relationship to weight.
Three prior studies have shown that marijuana users are less likely to be obese, have a lower risk for diabetes and have lower body-mass-index measurements. And these trends occurred despite the fact that they seemed to take in more calories.
Why? "The most important finding is that current users of marijuana appeared to have better carbohydrate metabolism than nonusers," says Murray Mittleman, an associate professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and the lead author of the study. "Their fasting insulin levels were lower, and they appeared to be less resistant to the insulin produced by their body to maintain a normal blood-sugar level."
The research included over 4,600 men and women participating in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey between 2005 and 2010. Among them, 48% had smoked marijuana at least once in their lives, and 12% were current cannabis smokers. The authors controlled for other factors like age, sex, income, alcohol use, cigarette smoking and physical activity that could also affect diabetes risk.
Even after these adjustments, the current marijuana users showed fasting insulin levels that were 16% lower than those of former or never users, along with a 17% reduction in another measure of insulin resistance as well. Higher levels on both tests are associated with Type II diabetes, which is linked with obesity.
Marijuana users also had higher levels of high-density lipoprotein, the so-called good cholesterol, which can protect against heart disease. And the regular smokers also boasted smaller waistlines: on average, they were 1.5 inches (3.8 cm) slimmer than the former users and those who had never smoked cannabis.
Researchers don't yet know how to explain these correlations -- and since the study was not a controlled trial, it's not clear whether marijuana or some other factor in marijuana users' lifestyles actually accounted for the beneficial effects.
Studies showed, however, that the cannabinoid brain receptors affected by marijuana are deeply involved in appetite and metabolism. But the exact details of how the compound alters the relationship between appetite, caloric intake and insulin response isn't obvious yet.
One clue, however, may lie in the effects of a diet drug that was developed to have the opposite effect that marijuana has on the brain. That drug, rimonabant, produced significant weight loss and a drop in fasting insulin levels by affecting certain cannabinoid receptors in the exact opposite way that THC, marijuana's main psychoactive ingredient, does.
This action is complex: rimonabant doesn't simply block the receptor and keep the natural cannabinoids from activating it. Instead, while the natural cannabinoids elevate the normal level of activity already going on in the system, rimonabant lowers it so the result is precisely the reverse of activating the receptor naturally.
However, because of psychiatric side effects like increasing suicide risk, rimonabant was pulled from the European market and never approved in the United States.
TIME.com: Reverse engineering the marijuana 'munchies:' What causes binge eating?
How could both marijuana and a compound that has the opposite effect of pot act on the same brain receptors and lead to weight loss?
Natural marijuana includes many different potentially active compounds, and one of them -- rather than THC -- could be responsible for this effect. One potential candidate is a substance called cannabidiol, which also affects cannabinoid receptors, but in a different way from the way THC or rimonabant does.
Another possibility involves tolerance: repeated use of a drug can make receptors less sensitive over time. "The most likely explanation is that prolonged cannabis use causes the (receptors) to lose sensitivity and become inactive," says Daniele Piomelli, a professor of pharmacology at the University of California, Irvine, who was not associated with the new research.
"This has been shown to happen in people who smoke marijuana. This weakening of (these receptors) translates into a lower risk for obesity and diabetes because the inactive receptor would be unable to respond to our own cannabis-like molecules, which we know are important in keeping us chubby."
While marijuana may initially promote appetite and overeating, in the long run it has the opposite effect because it desensitizes cannabinoid receptors and may even protect against obesity.
So don't skip the gym and break out the bong just yet: there's still not enough data to tell whether marijuana, like alcohol, could have health benefits in moderation. Mittleman says the study relied on self-reported use of marijuana, which can be unreliable. However, he points out that since people are more likely to hide drug use than they are to falsely claim it, the findings could even underestimate marijuana's effects.
TIME.com: Marijuana slims? Why pot smokers are less obese
But whether that's true, and whether marijuana might be a window into understanding how to best control glucose and insulin to prevent diabetes, isn't known yet.
"It is much too early to say," says Mittleman. "We need much more research to better understand the biologic responses to marijuana use. We really need more research to allow physicians and patients to make decisions based on solid evidence." An editorial that accompanied the study also urged government action to reduce barriers to such research.
Even with 18 states now approving marijuana for medical uses, the politics of pot will always overshadow research efforts to understand how cannabinoids work in the brain -- or affect disease. But, as Piomelli says, "the (new) study suggests that smoking marijuana (may) protect people against obesity and diabetes." And following up on that finding could yield new insights into how to tackle one of our biggest public-health issues.
 

DennisRGH

Reset
I frequently come across positive reports of cannabis, but I don't post them because I think people are bored with the topic. Just today, I saw 2 that I did not post.
 

Double_A

TB Fanatic
I dunno I would think smoking MJ then snacking on 2 bags of doritos and a box of ice cream sandwiches has got to be fattening
 

Melodi

Disaster Cat
I dunno I would think smoking MJ then snacking on 2 bags of doritos and a box of ice cream sandwiches has got to be fattening

I think the article is suggesting that this side-effect is shorter term, so that the drug could be used either way - both to help chemo (or other folks with severe stomach and malnutrition problems) to gain and keep on weight; but with longer term use the body seems to actually moderate that effect and perhaps even start to process some foods (like simple and complex carbs) better causing weight to balance (which is what you want) rather than leading either towards being too skinny or being too fat.

This is why, at this point in time, I think the criminalization of the plant and even worse that of research on it; is in itself criminal. Like any plant (natural drug, including chamomile) it is going to have some great potentials for some conditions, turn out to be a dud for others and provide mixed results on even more situations and or populations.

The problem is that doctor's don't know because the research doesn't get done, and what does get done is pretty much dominated by big Pharma companies who have no interest in how it can be used as a basic plant (smoked, used with a medical inhailor, brewed as a tea, made into a tinchor or eaten as a cookie) because they can only make money off synthetic versions they can shop.

Like Tumeric, which has proved pretty much impossible to stay effective when broken down into chemical bits, or made in synthetic form; Mary Jane has proved nearly impossible to replicate in totality simply by chemically breaking apart and making synthetic versions. Like Tumeric, you seem to need the whole plant (or the whole seed/flower etc) to get all the parts to work together - unlike Tumeric you can get some effects from synthetics but attempts to "de-high" the drug for example, especially in a lab, just tend to make it less effective against pain and stomach problems (the two most common uses now and through out history).

On the other hand, natural breeding programs (only the tomatoes and roses seem to get as dedicated gardeners as pot growers) have created strains that reduce the "high" effect while boosting pain killing or other desired results. But that can only be done legally (until recently) outside the US and still not in most Federally funded research programs (I think there may be one?).

What we are seeing now, as Baby Boomers age is one of the few, good, side-effects I think my generation is now bringing to the table. As the pains of aging and chronic (or even major) illness start to take hold, they remember that stuff they use to use at parties and festivals before they all got jobs, married and had kids. They read that for thousands of years it was used to relieve pain and nausea so they give it a try and by golly it works; after awhile, the States realize they are sitting on a gold mine of potential taxes and revue which combines with a weak and rather silly Central Government whose position is just asking to be ignore (on a number of subjects).

So the current brand of prohibition is being reversed, State by State (as it should be) and hopefully the Federal Government will just do what it did with Booze and mostly drop the subject so medicine can do its job and real problems tackled.
 

BadMedicine

Would *I* Lie???
I frequently come across positive reports of cannabis, but I don't post them because I think people are bored with the topic. Just today, I saw 2 that I did not post.

Please post them. This is a self-help and preparedness forum. Anyway we can increase our arsenal of knowledge and resources is NOT boring! The naysayers and crybabies can stick to big pharma & big .gov for help. You can tell a stooge by how vehemently they deny the truth.
 

DennisRGH

Reset
Please post them. This is a self-help and preparedness forum. Anyway we can increase our arsenal of knowledge and resources is NOT boring! The naysayers and crybabies can stick to big pharma & big .gov for help. You can tell a stooge by how vehemently they deny the truth.

okee, dokee. here ya go.

http://www.wakingtimes.com/2013/05/15/why-research-is-right-about-smoking-vs-eating-medicinal-marijuana/

Why Research is Right About Smoking vs. Eating Medicinal Marijuana

Late last month, a new study on medical marijuana peaked my interest after making headlines around the world. Covered by major media outlets such as NBC and WebMD, the story was reported along the lines of: Marijuana Pills Are Better Pain Killers Than Marijuana! (1,2)

Disregarding the ironic way in which the news was reported and the fact that coverage failed to extend to the NIDA (National Institute on Drug Abuse) sponsors’ potential conflicts of interest, the actual findings reveal some truth behind the benefits of consuming marijuana orally instead of by more traditional methods, such as smoking, when it comes to dealing with pain (3).

As the NIDA researchers demonstrated, the infamous marijuana pill (dronabinol) seems to last a couple hours longer than a cannabis cigarette) in terms of pain relief — 4.5 hours verses 2.5 hours.

But what many patients have found out for themselves is that dronabinol and similar marijuana pills that contain pure THC are not nearly as therapeutic as medical marijuana itself. Most likely because cannabis contains over 60 cannabinoids, many of which are believed to hold more promise than THC in medical application (4).

For instance, cannabidiol (CBD), a cannabinoid that has recently taken the spotlight in cannabis research, is believed to possess the same medical properties as THC, but without the high (5). On the other hand, the use of dronabinol often leads to intolerable levels of psychoactivity, despite the fact that it remains light years ahead of medical marijuana in FDA hurdle-jumping.

Still, patients who have braved the waters of questionably-legal marijuana have already discovered alternative ways of taking their medicine in order to maximize its effectiveness.

Indeed, medical marijuana patients have been using marijuana brownies and other edible preparations for ages. These preparations are absorbed by the digestive system and provide a longer and more consistent release of cannabinoids, allowing patients to forgo smoking a joint every few hours or so. And while the high may not be nearly as brain-numbing, an extended period of cannabinoid activity is definitely preferable from a medical standpoint.

Another good reason to consume marijuana orally are the harmful effects associated with smoking pretty much anything. Indeed, while studies have failed to link marijuana smoke to impaired lung function or an increased risk of lung cancer, marijuana still deposits a hefty amount of tar into the lungs and can even cause a mild pulmonary condition known as bronchitis (6).

Because of this, doctors who support the use of medical marijuana advocate the use of vaporizers over traditional smoking methods such as a joint or a pipe (7). Vaporizers operate at a much lower temperature, which allows patients to avoid the toxic byproducts of combustion while still receiving the active medical compounds of marijuana in vapor form (8).

What’s more, studies show that vaporizers are not only more efficient when it comes to overall cannabinoid delivery — vaporizers convert 46% THC verses less than 25% THC being converted by a joint — but also seem to offer significant benefits to the lungs. In fact, a 2010 study found that the use of a vaporizer could even help to reverse damage done by traditional methods of smoking (9).

In light of the fact that doctors and patients are fully aware of the alternative ways that medical marijuana can be taken, it seems like the NIDA’s efforts to convince us that marijuana-based pharmaceuticals are the better way to go is not purely driven by a desire to improve public health.

Perhaps it is political or economical motives that are perpetuating the negative stigma associated with medical marijuana, because — as thousands of patients around the world will tell you — cannabis is a powerful medicine that takes healthcare out of the hands of profit-driven pharmaceutical companies and places it into the hands of patients themselves.
 

DennisRGH

Reset
don't know who Tommy Chong is, but.....

http://www.wakingtimes.com/2013/05/15/tommy-chong-beats-prostate-cancer-with-diet-and-hemp-oil/

Tommy Chong Beats Prostate Cancer with Hemp Oil and Proper Diet
May 15, 2013 | By Dylan Charles | 12 Replies More

Tommy-ChongWaking Times

Last June, the famous comedian, actor and pro-marijuana legalization advocate, Tommy Chong, reported to the world that he had been diagnosed with stage 1 prostate cancer and that he was seeking unconventional treatment using Cannabis Oil. Almost one year later, Tommy is feeling better than ever and is cancer free.

Tommy’s recent announcement, in a blog post, about his successful battle with cancer is a huge boon to those battling this illness and many others, and also for those fighting for the common-sensical liberation of this promising natural medicine:

“After I came out with the news last June that a cancer doctor told me I had prostrate cancer and suggested a high frequency treatment that is not approved in America and could only be done in Mexico at the cost of $25,000, I immediately looked at alternatives. I contacted my nephew in Vancouver, who was about to become a doctor, and he suggested I meet with a Dr. McKinnon in Victoria, BC. That doctor changed my diet and put me on supplements, and within a year I brought my PSA numbers down drastically and eliminated the cancer threat. I also treated the condition with hemp oil (hash oil). With the diet, the supplements and the hash oil, plus a session with a world-renowned healer, Adam Dreamhealer, I’m cancer-free. That’s right, I kicked cancer’s ass! So the magic plant does cure cancer with the right diet and supplements. I’m due for another blood test, MRI, etc., but I feel the best I’ve felt in years. And now for a celebration joint of the finest Kush…” [CelebStoner]

This case, and Tommy’s choice to seek this alternative, but, viable and natural treatment, highlight how important the battle for legalization is for many people sick with ailments that can be treated effectively without damaging invasive procedures or expensive and debilitating regiments of chemotherapy, radiation and pharmaceuticals. There is much more to legalization than people just wanting to get ‘high’. As Tommy stated in 2012:

“I’ve got prostate cancer, and I’m treating it with hemp oil, with cannabis,” Chong said. “So [legalizing marijuana] means a lot more to me than just being able to smoke a joint without being arrested.”

For someone in Tommy’s position, seeking alternative treatments outside of the Unites States was an open option, yet for many of the over 12 million Americans who are fighting cancer, leaving the US for treatment is simply not an option, even though the costs of one month of conventional cancer treatments can reach an absurd $10,000 or more, for a single month.

Advocate and healer Rick Simpson explains how Cannabis Oil can cure cancer and other serious illnesses in his important documentary, Run From the Cure:

In addition to the powerful medicine Cannabis, a proper diet is also critical to beating cancer. Many cancer patients in the US are prescribed dangerous procedures and chemo/radiation, but doctors rarely mention the importance of an alkaline diet, and will often recommend eating regular, processed and inorganic foods while undergoing treatment.

The cat is out of the bag that Cannabis and good food cure cancer, and the race is on to see who can bring access to medical marijuana to the public. Already, pharmaceutical companies are rushing to patent various chemical components of the plant, so it is already clear that the future of modern medicine will have to include this humble plant.

References:

http://cstx4.celebstoner.modxcloud.com/blogs/tommy-chong/2013/05/06/tommy-chong-im-cancer-free!/

http://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancerbasics/cancer-prevalence

http://www.torontosun.com/2013/05/13/tommy-chong-says-hes-beaten-cancer-using-marijuana

http://www.cancer.org/treatment/fin...ginsuranceissues/the-cost-of-cancer-treatment
 

DennisRGH

Reset
http://www.naturalblaze.com/2013/05/smoking-marijuana-effective-at-treating.html

Marijuana is an Effective Treatment for Crohn's Disease
Wednesday, May 15, 2013 | 1 comments

By Jeffrey Green

A study published earlier this month on the government's website National Institutes of Health found that marijuana has "significant benefits" for treating Crohn's Disease and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS).

"A short course (8 week) of THC-rich cannabis produced significant clinical, steroid-free benefits to 11 patients with active CD, compared to placebo, without side effects," the study concluded.

Conducted by Tel Aviv University, the study included 21 patients with Crohn's who did not previously respond to therapy with steroids, immunomodulators, or anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents. Half of the control group were given a placebo and the other half were given 2 marijuana joints per day.


The goal of the study was to get the patients into complete remission. The placebo produced 1 person out of ten in the placebo group to experience complete remission. Whereas 5 out of 11 (45%) patients given cannabis to smoke successfully went into remission. Additionally, a beneficial clinical response, or decrease in inflammation, was observed in 10/11 cannabis patients versus only 4/10 in the placebo group.

The marijuana patients experienced "no significant side effects" and a few even weaned themselves off of steroid dependency.

Here are the official results from the study:

RESULTS:Complete remission (a CDAI score < 150) was achieved by 5/11 subjects in the cannabis group (45%) and 1/10 in the placebo group (10%). A clinical response (a decrease in CDAI score of > 100) was observed in 10/11 subjects in the cannabis group (90%) and 4/10 in the placebo group (40%). Three patients in the cannabis group were weaned from steroid dependency. Subjects receiving cannabis reported improved appetite and sleep, with no significant side effects.

Since smoking marijuana is considered one of the least effective forms of delivering the medicine in cannabis, the researchers recommend further studies with a non-smoking mode of intake.

CONCLUSION:Although the primary endpoint of the study (induction of remission) was not achieved, a short course (8 week) of THC-rich cannabis produced significant clinical, steroid-free benefits to 11 patients with active CD, compared to placebo, without side effects. Further studies, with larger patient groups and a non-smoking mode of intake, are warranted.

Link to the study: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23648372
 

DennisRGH

Reset
http://www.wakingtimes.com/2013/05/06/marijuana-verses-leading-pharmaceuticals-in-the-treatment-of-colon-cancer/

Marijuana Verses Leading Pharmaceuticals In The Treatment of Colon Cancer
May 6, 2013 | By Dylan Charles


Medical marijuana has been touted as an effective cancer treatment for decades by its various supporters, but despite the growing number of states that have legalized cannabis for medical purposes, marijuana remains a sparsely recommended drug for patients with life-threatening illnesses.

On the other hand, large pharmaceutical manufacturers continue to churn out novel cancer treatments at a rapid pace, with each new formula being marketed as a cutting-edge therapy that will revolutionize the global fight against cancer. Unfortunately, this tends to be far from the reality.

A great example of this is a cancer drug called Avastin (bevacizumab). Avastin is most commonly prescribed for the treatment of colon cancer, but has also been used to treat lung cancer, breast cancer, and a specific form of brain cancer known as gliobastoma.

More notably, the drug recently made headline news for a newly uncovered side-effect: flesh-eating disease. Indeed, a safety review released by Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., the makers of the drug, earlier this year, identified 52 cases of flesh-eating disease among patients with an Avastin prescription. 17 of these cases were fatal (1).

But while flesh-eating disease is considered to be one of the rarer side-effects of Avastin, its more frequently-reported side-effects are just as concerning. Clinical trials show that a significant number of Avastin users experience a heightened risk of bleeding, hypertension and gastrointestinal perforation – a hole in the intestines (2).

Unfortunately, such dangerous side-effects are all-too-common among cancer therapies and have come to be accepted as something that patients will simply have to deal with. Up until 2011, when the FDA revoked their prior approval of Avastin for the treatment of breast cancer, it held the title of the best-selling cancer drug in the world (3).

And although follow-up trials showed that Avastin was not effective enough at prolonging overall survival or slowing disease progression in breast cancer patients, it continues to be widely prescribed for colon cancer — a disease that was estimated to claim over 600,000 lives in 2008 (4).

It’s interesting to note that Avastin makes no claim to curing colon cancer or preventing disease-related deaths. Instead, Avastin merely prolongs survival — by an average of less than 5 months, according to clinical trials (5).

All that for a drug that costs over $100,000 per patient for a single year’s worth of treatment (6)? It’s about time that someone took a better look at what medical marijuana has to offer as an alternative treatment for colon cancer.

Luckily, someone already has, by the name of the National Cancer Institute. Listed on their website is an enlightening summary of what medical marijuana research has shown so far (7).

“CBD has also been demonstrated to exert a chemoprotective effect in a mouse model of colon cancer… In in vitro experiments involving colorectal cell lines, the investigators found that CBD protected DNA from oxidative damage, increased endocannabinoid levels, and reduced cell proliferation.”

“In addition, both plant-derived and endogenous cannabinoids have been studied for anti-inflammatory effects. A mouse study demonstrated that endogenous cannabinoid system signaling is likely to provide intrinsic protection against colonic inflammation. As a result, a hypothesis that phytocannabinoids and endocannabinoids may be useful in the risk reduction and treatment of colorectal has been developed.”

But such positive evidence shouldn’t be news to anyone that’s been keeping up with cannabis research (8). And while its effectiveness has yet to be evaluated in humans, a direct comparison to Avastin makes the $100,000-a-year drug look downright silly.

Indeed, in subsequent sections, the National Cancer Institute outlines another well-documented aspect of marijuana’s cancer-fighting potential, in the form of angiogenesis inhibition. Angiogenesis is the growth of new blood vessels, which is over stimulated in most types of cancer and is a primary factor in the growth and metastasis of tumor cells. Angiogenesis inhibition also happens to be the very same mechanism by which Avastin acts against cancer, albeit not by binding to cannabinoid receptors.

So there you have it. Research suggests that medical marijuana not only has the same angiogenesis inhibiting effect as Avastin, but may also be able to protect healthy cells from the toxins associated with chemotherapy as well as reduce cancer cell proliferation and inflammatory responses, all of which Avastin is incapable of doing. Not to mention, the most common side-effects of marijuana are dizziness and fatigue, which is nowhere near as serious as those of traditional pharmaceuticals (9).

But there is one thing that Avastin beats medical marijuana at, and that is funding. Funding, or a lack thereof, is the most blatant reason why medical marijuana will continue to be overlooked by the FDA and medical professionals. Simply put, without millions of dollars to fund clinical trials, medical marijuana cannot compete with the continuous output of deep-pocketed pharmaceutical manufacturers. And you can bet that a large portion of their profits goes towards their lobbying budget, ensuring that publicly-funding marijuana research will remain in its pre-clinical stage for as long as anyone can fathom.

Because once people realize that the most effective cancer treatment can be grown in their own backyards, $100,000 for a year’s supply of Avastin becomes a ridiculous suggestion.
About the Author

Kent Mao is a contributor to Waking Times and the editor of TruthOnPot.com, an online resource for medical marijuana facts, information and research. TruthOnPot.com actively engages in the online discussion of marijuana research and policy. You can learn more by visiting www.truthonpot.com. Kent is also a contributor to Waking Times.

Sources:

(1) http://www.cbc.ca/news/health/story/2013/05/02/avastin-flesh-eating-disease.html

(2) http://www.avastin.com/patient/overview/side-effects

(3) http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm280536.htm

(4) http://globocan.iarc.fr/

(5) http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe048098

(6) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18366965

(7) http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/cam/cannabis/healthprofessional/page4

(8) http://www.truthonpot.com/category/medical/

(9) http://www.truthonpot.com/2013/03/09/medical-marijuana-the-future-of-breast-cancer-therapy/
 

DennisRGH

Reset
this one is an oldie (Oct/12), but goodie.


http://collapsereport.com/2012/10/10/spain-study-confirms-hemp-oil-cures-cancer-without-side-effects/

Spain Study Confirms Cannabis Oil Cures Cancer Without Side Effects
October 10, 2012 · by thscollapsereport · in Healthcare

[Note: Some have commented that this article is a bit misleading. While Hemp seed oil is generally healthy with lots of gamma linoleic acid, it is the Marijuana Buds and Leaves, soaked in alcohol and then slow cooked down so that the alcohol evaporates and leaves behind the pure extracted essence into a black tar like substance that is the hemp oil which is the cancer cure. I have added this video to help clarify it. Cannabis oil contains THC and produces a THC effect. But that is not why cancer patients take it. It has millions of unknown substances which is currently beyond today's science. I have retitled the article Cannabis Oil and Cancer to avoid the confusion. I hope this helps.


Please donate to Phoenix Tears. People are serving 3 year jail sentences just for helping dying kids. I am not connected with Phoenix Tears in any way.

This 100 dollar device can be used to make the oil and more carefully control the temperature: Food Immersion Temperature Controller

Phoenix Tears Foundation
7931 S Broadway #230
Littleton, CO 80122
(303) 719-8658
info@phoenixtearsfoundation.com

- Thanks - ED]

Cannabis Oil and Cancer

By Mark Sircus Ac., OMD

The medical science is strongly in favor of THC laden hemp oil as a primary cancer therapy, not just in a supportive role to control the side effects of chemotherapy. The International Medical Verities Association is putting hemp oil on its cancer protocol. It is a prioritized protocol list whose top five items are magnesium chloride, iodine, selenium, Alpha Lipoic Acid and sodium bicarbonate. It makes perfect sense to drop hemp oil right into the middle of this nutritional crossfire of anti cancer medicines, which are all available without prescription.

Hemp oil has long been recognized as one of the most versatile and beneficial substances known to man. Derived from hemp seeds (a member of the achene family of fruits) it has been regarded as a superfood due to its high essential fatty acid content and the unique ratio of omega3 to omega6 and gamma linolenic acid (GLA) – 2:5:1. Hemp oil, is known to contain up to 5% of pure GLA, a much higher concentration than any other plant, even higher than spirulina. For thousands of years, the hemp plant has been used in elixirs and medicinal teas because of its healing properties and now medical science is zeroing in on the properties of its active substances.

Both the commercial legal type of hemp oil and the illegal THC laden hemp oil are one of the most power-packed protein sources available in the plant kingdom. Its oil can be used in many nutritional and trans-dermal applications. In other chapters in my Winning the War on Cancer book we will discuss in-depth about GLA and cancer and also the interesting work of Dr. Johanna Budwig. She uses flax seed oil instead of hemp oil to cure cancer – through effecting changes in cell walls – using these omega3 and omega6 laden medicinal oils.

Actually there is another way to use medical marijuana without smoking the leaf. According to Dr. Tod H. Mikuriya, “The usual irritating and toxic breakdown products of burning utilized with smoking are totally avoided with vaporization. Extraction and inhaling cannabinoid essential oils below ignition temperature of both crude and refined cannabis products affords significant mitigation of irritation to the oral cavity, and tracheobronchial tree from pyrollytic breakdown products.[iii]

Dr. Mikuriya continues saying “The usual irritating and toxic breakdown products of burning utilized with smoking are totally avoided with vaporization. Extraction and inhaling cannabinoid essential oils below ignition temperature of both crude and refined cannabis products affords significant mitigation of irritation to the oral cavity, and tracheobronchial tree from pyrollytic breakdown products.”[iv]

Rick Simpson, the man in the above mentioned videos, has been making hemp oil and sharing it with friends and neighbors without charging for it. In small doses, he says, it makes you well without getting you high. “Well you can’t deny your own eyes can you?” Simpson asks. “Here’s someone dying of cancer and they’re not dying anymore. I don’t care if the medicine comes from a tomato plant, potato plant or a hemp plant, if the medicine is safe and helps and works, why not use it?” he asks.

When a person has cancer and is dying this question reaches a critical point. The bravery of Rick Simpson from Canada in showing us how to make hemp oil for ourselves offers many people a hope that should be increasingly appreciated as money dries up for expensive cancer treatments. We are going to need inexpensive medicines in the future and there is nothing better than the ones we can make reasonably cheaply ourselves.

For most people in the world it is illegal so the choice could come down to breaking the law or dying. There is no research to indicate what advantages oral use of hemp oil vs. vaporization but we can assume that advantage would be nutritional with oral intake. Dr. Budwig Below work would sustain this point of view especially for cancer patients.

The Science

According to Dr. Robert Ramer and Dr. Burkhard Hinz of the University of Rostock in Germany medical marijuana can be an effective treatment for cancer.[v] Their research was published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute Advance Access on December 25th of 2007 in a paper entitled Inhibition of Cancer Cell Invasion by Cannabinoids via Increased Expression of Tissue Inhibitor of Matrix Metalloproteinases-1.

The biggest contribution of this breakthrough discovery, is that the expression of TIMP-1 was shown to be stimulated by cannabinoid receptor activation and to mediate the anti-invasive effect of cannabinoids. Prior to now the cellular mechanisms underlying this effect were unclear and the relevance of the findings to the behavior of tumor cells in vivo remains to be determined.

Marijuana cuts lung cancer tumor growth in half, a 2007 Harvard Medical School study shows. The active ingredient in marijuana cuts tumor growth in lung cancer in half and significantly reduces the ability of the cancer to spread, say researchers at Harvard University who tested the chemical in both lab and mouse studies.

This is the first set of experiments to show that the compound, Delta-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), inhibits EGF-induced growth and migration in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expressing non-small cell lung cancer cell lines. Lung cancers that over-express EGFR are usually highly aggressive and resistant to chemotherapy. THC that targets cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2 is similar in function to endocannabinoids, which are cannabinoids that are naturally produced in the body and activate these receptors.

“The beauty of this study is that we are showing that a substance of abuse, if used prudently, may offer a new road to therapy against lung cancer,” said Anju Preet, Ph.D., a researcher in the Division of Experimental Medicine. Acting through cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2, endocannabinoids (as well as THC) are thought to play a role in variety of biological functions, including pain and anxiety control, and inflammation.

Researchers reported in the August 15, 2004 issue of Cancer Research, the journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, that marijuana’s constituents inhibited the spread of brain cancer in human tumor biopsies.[vii] In a related development, a research team from the University of South Florida further noted that THC can also selectively inhibit the activation and replication of gamma herpes viruses. The viruses, which can lie dormant for years within white blood cells before becoming active and spreading to other cells, are thought to increase one’s chances of developing cancers such as Kaposi’s Sarcoma, Burkitt’s lymphoma and Hodgkin’s disease.

In 1998, a research team at Madrid’s Complutense University discovered that THC can selectively induce programmed cell death in brain tumor cells without negatively impacting surrounding healthy cells. Then in 2000, they reported in the journal Nature Medicine that injections of synthetic THC eradicated malignant gliomas (brain tumors) in one-third of treated rats, and prolonged life in another third by six weeks.

Led by Dr. Manuel Guzman the Spanish team announced they had destroyed incurable brain cancer tumors in rats by injecting them with THC. They reported in the March 2002 issue of “Nature Medicine” that they injected the brains of 45 rats with cancer cells, producing tumors whose presence they confirmed through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). On the 12th day they injected 15 of the rats with THC and 15 with Win-55,212-2 a synthetic compound similar to THC.

Researchers at the University of Milan in Naples, Italy, reported in the Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics that non-psychoactive compounds in marijuana inhibited the growth of glioma cells in a dose-dependent manner, and selectively targeted and killed malignant cells through apoptosis. “Non-psychoactive CBD produce a significant anti-tumor activity both in vitro and in vivo, thus suggesting a possible application of CBD as an antineoplastic agent.”

The first experiment documenting pot’s anti-tumor effects took place in 1974 at the Medical College of Virginia at the behest of the U.S. government. The results of that study, reported in an Aug. 18, 1974, Washington Post newspaper feature, were that marijuana’s psychoactive component, THC, “slowed the growth of lung cancers, breast cancers and a virus-induced leukemia in laboratory mice, and prolonged their lives by as much as 36 percent.”

Funded by the National Institute of Health to find evidence that marijuana damages the immune system, found instead that THC slowed the growth of three kinds of cancer in mice — lung and breast cancer, and a virus-induced leukemia. The DEA quickly shut down the Virginia study and all further cannabis/tumor research even though the researchers “found that THC slowed the growth of lung cancers, breast cancers and a virus-induced leukemia in laboratory mice, and prolonged their lives by as much as 36 percent.”

“Antineoplastic Activity of Cannabinoids,” an article in a 1975 Journal of the National Cancer Institute reports, “Lewis lung adenocarcinoma growth was retarded by the oral administration of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabinol (CBN)” — two types of cannabinoids, a family of active components in marijuana. “Mice treated for 20 consecutive days with THC and CBN had reduced primary tumor size.”

Marijuana relieves pain that narcotics like morphine and OxyContin
have hardly any effect on, and could help ease suffering from
illnesses such as multiple sclerosis, diabetes and cancer.

According to Devra Davis in her book Secret History of the War on Cancer, 1.5 million lives have been lost because Americans failed to act on existing knowledge about the environmental causes of cancer. It is impossible to calculate the added deaths from suppressed ‘cancer cures’ but we do know of the terrible suffering of hundreds of thousands of people who have been jailed for marijuana use.

Hemp oil with THC included has the making of a primary cancer treatment, which even alone seems to have a great chance of turning the tide against cancer tumors. It has the added advantage of safety, ease of use, lack of side effects and low cost if one makes it oneself. Surrounded by other medicinal anti-cancer substances in a full protocol it’s hard to imagine anyone failing and falling in their war on cancer.

THC should be included in every cancer protocol.

Sodium bicarbonate is another excellent anti tumor substance that reduces tumors but is much more difficult to administer than THC hemp oil. Cannabinoids are able to pass through all barriers in the body like Alpha Lipoic Acid so simple oral intake is sufficient. With bicarbonate we need intravenous applications and often even this is not sufficient, often we have to use catheters and few doctors in the world are willing to administer this way.

In the end all cancer treatments that are not promoted by mainstream oncology are illegal. No licensed doctor is going to claim that are curing cancer with sodium bicarbonate though they will treat people with cancer explaining they are balancing pH or some other metabolic profile with this common emergency room medicine found also most kitchens of the world. More than several states have passed laws making medical marijuana legal but the federal government will not relax and let people be free to choose their treatments even if their lives depend on it.

Davis notes that the cowardice of research scientists, who publish thoroughly referenced reports but pull their punches at the end, by claiming that more research needs to be done before action can be taken. Statements like these are exploited by industry that buys time to make much more money. It is a deliberate attempt that creates wholesale public doubt from small data gaps and remaining scientific uncertainties.

They have done that with everything right up to and including sunlight. Everything is thought to be dangerous except the pharmaceutical drugs which are the most dangerous substances of all. Stomach wrenching chemotherapy and the death principle of radiation are legal yet safe THC laden hemp oil is not.

It is legal for doctors to attack people with their poisons but you can go to jail for trying to save yourself or a loved one from cancer with the oil of a simple garden weed. Our civilization has put up with this insanity but there is a great price being paid. In a mad medical world people die that need not and this is a terrible sadness that has destroyed the integrity and ethics of modern medicine.

The science for the use of hemp oil is credible, specific fact-based, and is documented in detail. There is absolutely no reason to not legalize medical marijuana and create an immediate production and distribution of THC hemp oil to cancer patients. Unfortunately we live in a world populated with governments and medical henchmen who would rather see people die cruel deaths then have access to a safe and effect cancer drug.

Meanwhile the Food and Drug Administration approved Genentech’s best-selling drug, Avastin, as a treatment for breast cancer, in a decision, according to the New York Times, “that appeared to lower the threshold somewhat for approval of certain cancer drugs. The big question was whether it was enough for a drug temporarily to stop cancer from worsening — as Avastin had done in a clinical trial — or was it necessary for a drug to enable patients to live longer, which Avastin had failed to do. Oncologists and patient advocates were divided, in part because of the drug’s sometimes severe side effects.”

The differences between Avastin and hemp oil are huge. First Avastin will earn Genentech hundreds of millions where THC hemp oil will earn no one anything. Second there are no severe or even mild side effects to taking hemp oil and lastly it is not a temporary answer but a real solution. Certainly hemp oil will ensure a longer life.



 

DennisRGH

Reset
http://www.alternet.org/drugs/latest-cannabis-discoveries-federal-government-doesnt-want-you-know-about?paging=off

The Latest Cannabis Discoveries That the Federal Government Doesn’t Want You to Know About

Federal lawmakers and the White House continue to willfully ignore science in regards to the cannabis plant.

May 22, 2013 |

Despite issuing a highly publicized memorandum in 2009 stating, "Science and the scientific process must inform and guide decisions of my Administration," it remains clear that federal lawmakers and the White House continue to willfully ignore science in regards to the cannabis plant and the federal policies which condemn it to the same prohibitive legal status as heroin. In fact, in 2011 the Obama administration went so far as to reject an administrative petition that called for hearings to reevaluate pot’s safety and efficacy, pronouncing in the Federal Register, “Marijuana does not have a currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States or a currently accepted medical use with severe restrictions. At this time, the known risks of marijuana use have not been shown to be outweighed by specific benefits in well-controlled clinical trials that scientifically evaluate safety and efficacy.” (The Administration’s flat-Earth position was upheld in January by a three-judge panel for the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.)

Nevertheless, scientific evaluations of cannabis and the health of its consumers have never been more prevalent. Studies are now published almost daily rebuking the federal government’s allegations that the marijuana plant is a highly dangerous substance lacking any therapeutic utility. Yet, virtually all of these studies – and, more importantly, their implications for public policy – continue to be ignored by lawmakers. Here are just a few examples of the latest cannabis science that your federal government doesn’t want you to know about.

Frequent cannabis smokers possess no greater lung cancer risk than do either occasional pot smokers or non-smokers

Subjects who regularly inhale cannabis smoke do not possess an increased risk of lung cancer compared to those who either consume it occasionally or not at all, according to data presented in April at the annual meeting of the American Academy for Cancer Research.

Investigators from the University of California, Los Angeles analyzed data from six case-control studies, conducted between 1999 and 2012, involving over 5,000 subjects (2,159 cases and 2,985 controls) from around the world.

They reported, “Our pooled results showed no significant association between the intensity, duration, or cumulative consumption of cannabis smoke and the risk of lung cancer overall or in never smokers.”

Previous case-control studies have also failed to find an association between cannabis smoking and head and neck cancers or cancers of the upper aerodigestive tract.


Nevertheless, the federal Drug Enforcement Administration continues to maintain, “Marijuana smokers increase their risk of cancer of the head, neck, lungs and respiratory track.”

Consistent use of cannabis associated is associated with reduced risk factors for Type 2 diabetes

Will the pot plant one day play a role in staving the ongoing epidemic of Type 2 diabetes? Emerging science indicates that it just might.

According to trial data published this month in the American Journal of Medicine, subjects who regularly consume cannabis possess favorable indices related to diabetic control compared to occasional consumers or non-consumers.

Investigators at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre in Boston, assessed self-report data from some 5,000 adult onset diabetics patients regarding whether they smoked or had ever smoked marijuana. Researchers reported that those who were current, regular marijuana smokers possessed 16 percent lower fasting insulin levels and reduced insulin resistance compared to those who had never used pot. By contrast, non-users possessed larger waistlines and lower levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL or ‘good’) cholesterol – both of which are risk factors for type 2 diabetes.

Similar benefits were reported in occasional cannabis consumers, though these changes were less pronounced, “suggesting that the impact of marijuana use on insulin and insulin resistance exists during periods of recent use,” researchers reported.

The recent findings are supportive of the findings of 2012 study by a team of UCLA researchers, published in the British Medical Journal, which reported that adults with a history of marijuana use had a lower prevalence of type 2 diabetes and possess a lower risk of contracting the disease than did those with no history of cannabis consumption, even after researchers adjusted for social variables (ethnicity, level of physical activity, etc.) Concluded the study, “[This] analysis of adults aged 20-59 years … showed that participants who used marijuana had a lower prevalence of DM (Diabetes Mellitus) and lower odds of DM relative to non-marijuana users.”

Diabetes is the third leading cause of death in the United States after heart disease and cancer.

Inhaling cannabis dramatically mitigates symptoms of Crohn’sdisease

Smoking cannabis twice daily significantly reduces symptoms of Crohn’s disease, a type of inflammatory bowel disorder that is estimated to impact about half a million Americans. So say the results of the first-ever placebo-controlled trial assessing the use of cannabis for Crohn’s – published online this month in the scientific journal Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

Researchers at the Meir Medical Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology in Israel assessed the safety and efficacy of inhaled cannabis versus placebo in 21 subjects with Crohn’s disease who were nonresponsive to conventional treatment regimens. Eleven participants smoked standardized cannabis cigarettes containing 23 percent THC and 0.5 percent cannabidiol – a nonpsychotropic cannabinoid known to possess anti-inflammatory properties -- twice daily over a period of eight weeks. The other ten subjects smoked placebo cigarettes containing no active cannabinoids.

Investigators reported, “Our data show that 8-weeks treatment with THC-rich cannabis, but not placebo, was associated with a significant decrease of 100 points in CDAI (Crohn’s Disease and activity index) scores.” Five of the eleven patients in the study group reported achieving disease remission (defined as a reduction in patient’s CDAI score by more than 150 points). Participants who smoked marijuana reported decreased pain, improved appetite, and better sleep compared to control subjects. Researchers reported that “no significant side effects” were associated with cannabis inhalation.

The clinical results substantiate decades of anecdotal reports from Crohn’s patients, some one-half of which acknowledge having used cannabis to mitigate symptoms of the disease.

Marijuana-like substances halt HIV infection in white blood cells

The administration of THC has been associated with decreased mortality and ameliorated disease progression in monkeys with simian immunodeficiency virus, a primate model of HIV disease. So could cannabinoids produce similar outcomes in humans? The findings of a newly published preclinical trial indicate that the answer may be ‘yes’ and they reveal the substance’s likely mechanism of action in combating the disease.

Writing in the May edition of the Journal of Leukocyte Biology, investigators at the Temple University School of Medicine in Philadelphia reported that the administration of cannabinoid agonists limits HIV infection in macrophages (white blood cells that aid in the body's immune response). Researchers assessed the impact of three commercially available synthetic cannabis agonists (non-organic compounds that act on the same endogenous receptor sites as do plant cannabinoids) on HIV-infected macrophage cells. Following administration, researchers sampled the cells periodically to measure the activity of an enzyme called reverse transcriptase, which is essential for HIV replication. By day 7, investigators reported that the administration of all three compounds was associated with a significant decrease in HIV replication.

“The results suggest that selective CB2 (cannabinoid 2 receptor) agonists could potentially be used in tandem with existing antiretroviral drugs, opening the door to the generation of new drug therapies for HIV/AIDS,” researchers summarized in a Temple University news release. “The data also support the idea that the human immune system could be leveraged to fight HIV infection."

Cannabinoids offer a likely treatment therapy for PTSD

Post-traumatic stress syndrome is estimated to impact some eight millions American annually and effective treatments for the condition are few and far between. Yet just published research in the May issue of the journal Molecular Psychiatry indicates that cannabinoids hold the potential to successfully treat the condition.

Researchers at the New York School of Medicine reported that subjects diagnosed with PTSD possess elevated quantities of endogenous cannabinoid receptors in regions of the brain associated with fear and anxiety. In addition, authors also reported that these subjects suffer from the decreased production of anandamide, an endogenous cannabinoid neurotransmitter, resulting in an imbalanced endocannibinoid system. (The endogenous cannabinoid receptor system is a regulatory system that is present in living organisms for the purpose of promoting homeostasis).

Authors speculated that increasing the body’s production of cannabinoids would likely restore the body’s natural brain chemistry and psychological balance. They affirmed, “[Our] findings substantiate, at least in part, emerging evidence that … plant-derived cannabinoids such as marijuana may possess some benefits in individuals with PTSD by helping relieve haunting nightmares and other symptoms of PTSD.”

The researchers concluded: “The data reported herein are the first of which we are aware of to demonstrate the critical role of CB1 (cannabinoid) receptors and endocannabinoids in the etiology of PTSD in humans. As such, they provide a foundation upon which to develop and validate informative biomarkers of PTSD vulnerability, as well as to guide the rational development of the next generation of evidence-based treatments for PTSD.”

But don’t expect federal officials to help move this process forward. In 2011 federal administrators blocked investigators at the University of Arizona at Phoenix from conducting an FDA-approved, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the use of cannabis in 50 patients with PTSD.

Scientific integrity? Not when it comes to marijuana. Not by a long shot
 
Top