GUNS/RLTD U.S. Marine Corps Chooses H&K To Make SAW Replacement

mbabulldog

Has No Life - Lives on TB
http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=4401497&c=AME&s=LAN

The U.S. Marine Corps has selected the infantry automatic rifle made by Heckler & Koch as the weapon that will replace the M249 Squad Automatic Weapon in infantry fire teams, a senior service official told Marine Corps Times on Wednesday.

The H&K IAR "was truly the best in the class on multiple levels and will finally allow the billet of automatic rifleman to be performed as intended without the disruption of the squad integrity that the M249 created," Chief Warrant Officer 5 Jeffrey Eby, the Corps' senior gunner, said in an e-mail.
Related Topics

* Americas
* Land Warfare

The final contract competition also included two models from Colt Defense LLC and one model from FN Herstal.

Like the SAW, each IAR finalist is built for 5.56mm ammunition. Unlike the SAW, they are not designed to operate with a 200-round drum, a point of contention for some U.S. Marines concerned about a loss of firepower. The IAR is designed to use the same 30-round magazine used with the M16, although industry, including FN Herstal, is also developing high-capacity 5.56mm magazines for the weapon that could hold 100 or 150 rounds.

The H&K IAR is the lightest of the four weapons the U.S. Marine Corps tested this summer, after selecting finalists for the competition in December 2008. It weighs 7.9 pounds empty, with a barrel length of 16.5 inches and a collapsible stock that extends from 33 to 36.9 inches, company officials have said. It has a gas-operated system and fires from the closed-bolt position.

Marine Corps Systems Command, based at U.S. Marine Corps Base Quantico, Va., had not announced the winner of the IAR competition as of Wednesday morning. SysCom officials said in September that they expected a decision on the IAR to be made in October, but have declined interviews since. Eby, who oversees the Corps' infantry weapons experts, said he has known who won the contract for about a month, but referred questions about why it has not been announced to SysCom.

A formal protest was filed with the U.S. Government Accountability Office by FN Herstal to a Marine contract decision Oct. 30 and updated Nov. 23, but GAO officials declined to discuss whether the protest was related to the IAR decision. Colt currently has no contract protests filed with GAO.

Eby said initial operational testing is scheduled to take place from January to May in locations ranging from Panama to the Marine Corps Mountain Warfare Training Center and Marine Corps Air-Ground Combat Center in California.

"If successful and awarded full-rate production approval, then we should see initial operational capability by late summer 2010," Eby said.

Company officials could not immediately be reached for comment.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=4401497&c=AME&s=LAN

The U.S. Marine Corps has selected the infantry automatic rifle made by Heckler & Koch as the weapon that will replace the M249 Squad Automatic Weapon in infantry fire teams, a senior service official told Marine Corps Times on Wednesday.

The H&K IAR "was truly the best in the class on multiple levels and will finally allow the billet of automatic rifleman to be performed as intended without the disruption of the squad integrity that the M249 created," Chief Warrant Officer 5 Jeffrey Eby, the Corps' senior gunner, said in an e-mail.
Related Topics

* Americas
* Land Warfare

The final contract competition also included two models from Colt Defense LLC and one model from FN Herstal.

Like the SAW, each IAR finalist is built for 5.56mm ammunition. Unlike the SAW, they are not designed to operate with a 200-round drum, a point of contention for some U.S. Marines concerned about a loss of firepower. The IAR is designed to use the same 30-round magazine used with the M16, although industry, including FN Herstal, is also developing high-capacity 5.56mm magazines for the weapon that could hold 100 or 150 rounds.

The H&K IAR is the lightest of the four weapons the U.S. Marine Corps tested this summer, after selecting finalists for the competition in December 2008. It weighs 7.9 pounds empty, with a barrel length of 16.5 inches and a collapsible stock that extends from 33 to 36.9 inches, company officials have said. It has a gas-operated system and fires from the closed-bolt position.

Marine Corps Systems Command, based at U.S. Marine Corps Base Quantico, Va., had not announced the winner of the IAR competition as of Wednesday morning. SysCom officials said in September that they expected a decision on the IAR to be made in October, but have declined interviews since. Eby, who oversees the Corps' infantry weapons experts, said he has known who won the contract for about a month, but referred questions about why it has not been announced to SysCom.

A formal protest was filed with the U.S. Government Accountability Office by FN Herstal to a Marine contract decision Oct. 30 and updated Nov. 23, but GAO officials declined to discuss whether the protest was related to the IAR decision. Colt currently has no contract protests filed with GAO.

Eby said initial operational testing is scheduled to take place from January to May in locations ranging from Panama to the Marine Corps Mountain Warfare Training Center and Marine Corps Air-Ground Combat Center in California.

"If successful and awarded full-rate production approval, then we should see initial operational capability by late summer 2010," Eby said.

Company officials could not immediately be reached for comment.

H%26K-IAR-web.jpg


ORD_HK416_Labeled_lg.jpg
 

Vector

Veteran Member
OK, maybe I'm missing something here (again). The USMC is going to replace a heavier caliber weapon that can put seven times the rounds on a target, with similar accuracy and not much of a weight penalty with basically an upgraded M-16.
Why....??
 

Kent

Inactive
OK, maybe I'm missing something here (again). The USMC is going to replace a heavier caliber weapon that can put seven times the rounds on a target, with similar accuracy and not much of a weight penalty with basically an upgraded M-16.
Why....??

The HK works, the M249 does not, and they are both 5.56x45mm NATO.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
OK, maybe I'm missing something here (again). The USMC is going to replace a heavier caliber weapon that can put seven times the rounds on a target, with similar accuracy and not much of a weight penalty with basically an upgraded M-16.
Why....??

Here's an earlier article that explains what's going on.....

Posted for fair use......
http://www.marinecorpstimes.com/news/2009/02/marine_newsaw_020109w/

Marines to test, evaluate 4 auto-rifle models

By Dan Lamothe - Staff writer
Posted : Wednesday Feb 4, 2009 21:44:54 EST

MARINE CORPS BASE QUANTICO, Va. — Like it or not, it’s coming.

The Corps is moving forward with plans to test replacements for the M249 Squad Automatic Weapon, and will receive initial deliveries this spring, Marine officials said.

The Infantry Automatic Rifle could be fielded as early as October 2010, said Maj. John Smith, the weapon’s project officer at Marine Corps Systems Command in Quantico, Va. Testing is expected to begin in April on four finalists competing for the contract, with Camp Pendleton, Calif.-based 1st Marine Division involved in the process.

“It’ll be fleet Marines that are testing it,” Smith said. “We’ll be collecting data and getting feedback from Marines. All of [the weapons] could meet our needs, but we need to dig a little deeper and get the input on what the average Marine thinks.”

The push to include Marines in the process hasn’t stopped grumbling across the Corps. Many grunts question the wisdom of reducing the number of SAWs, light machine guns with a 5.56mm, 200-round belt that allows Marines to unleash a tremendous volume of fire when threatened. The IAR will employ the same 5.56mm, 30-round magazine used with the Corps’ main service weapons, the M16A4 rifle and M4 carbine.

“My big concern right now is that loss of fire,” said Staff Sgt. Craig Wilcox, an infantry unit leader who deployed to Afghanistan twice and Iraq once, and is now a combat instructor at the Camp Lejeune, N.C.-based School of Infantry-East. “We’re taught from day one that the SAW is the center of the squad itself. When you’re looking at dropping all those rounds, you’re going to lose your ability to maneuver and fire as quickly and efficiently as we have done in the past,” Wilcox said.

It’s a long-running debate in the Corps — even in the community that made the decision, said Patrick Cantwell, a former captain who serves as the Corps’ small arms capability officer.

Should the Corps cut weight to increase mobility? And if so, what should a new weapon offer?


A look at the finalists

The four finalists in the IAR competition, announced in December, stand in stark contrast to the SAW, which is more than 40 inches long and weighs about 16½ pounds empty. The weapon jumps to more than 22 pounds when loaded with the 200-round belt.

The lightest of the replacements under consideration is Heckler & Koch’s IAR, which weighs 7.9 pounds empty, with a 36.9-inch stock that collapses to 33 inches. The heaviest is FN Herstal’s entry, which weighs 11.2 pounds and has a 38.8-inch stock that collapses to 36.3 inches.

The other two finalists in the competition are made by Colt Defense, maker of the M4. Labeled the Colt 6940 and Colt 6940H, they weigh 10.1 pounds and 9.28 pounds, respectively, and vary because they have different heat sinks and upper receivers. Marine officials did not elaborate on the differences, but said the variations merited another look.

“They both performed very well, which is why they made the cut, but we needed to test them more to tell them apart,” Smith said.

Company officials at each of the three manufacturers remaining in the competition were tight-lipped about their products. HK and FNH, which makes the SAW, declined interviews, but provided specifications and photographs of their weapons, while Colt officials declined to be interviewed or release details about their products. The Corps released photographs and a basic description of each Colt weapon.

“Obviously we’re pleased to be included in the competition,” said retired Maj. Gen. James Battaglini, chief operating officer for Colt. “We’d rather let the results speak for themselves.”

The finalists diverge most clearly when it comes to their operating systems. Only FNH’s IAR fires from both the open- and closed-bolt positions, a requirement to keep the heat down when the Corps initially announced the competition. Cantwell said “that restriction went away” as officials surveyed their options.

“In a perfect world, we would like a [weapon firing from the] closed-bolt, because there are advantages to that, but we kind of took what we got and weighed the pros and cons, like the accuracy and the weight and the other elements,” Cantwell said.

Both of Colt’s weapons fire from the closed-bolt position using a direct gas impingement system, Marine officials said. HK’s IAR fires from the closed-bolt position using a gas-operated system.

The IAR finalists vary from the SAW in other ways, as well.

The SAW, first fielded in the 1980s, provides a sustained rate of fire of 85 rounds per minute. The sustained rate of fire available in the FNH and HK models is 12 to 15 rounds per minute, with a maximum effective rate of fire of 36 rounds per minute for 1,200 rounds or 75 rounds per minute for 600 rounds, company officials said.

At a cyclic rate, the SAW can fire more than 750 rounds per minute. FNH’s IAR fires from 560 to 640 rounds per minute at a cyclic rate, while HK’s fires 700 to 900.

Rates of fire for Colt’s models were not released, but the Corps required that the IAR fire 36 rounds per minute for 16 minutes, 40 seconds. The IAR also must fire at a higher rate of 75 rounds per minute for eight minutes, Cantwell said.

Early in the evaluation process, the Corps’ requirement called for the IAR to use 100-round magazines. That was eventually eliminated in favor of using 30-round magazines.

A change in mindset

The idea to replace the SAW dates back to August 2001, Cantwell said, before the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were on the horizon. Tired of lugging around the SAW, grunts with 2nd Battalion, 7th Marines, in Twentynine Palms, Calif., purchased three commercial automatic rifle variants and pitted them against the belt-fed beast.

“What they found was that the SAW had definite advantages, but it also had definite disadvantages, and the two (disadvantages) that they noted were employment speed and accuracy,” Cantwell said. “So they recommended that we go for an automatic rifle for infantry units.”

A month later, the idea was brought to the Marine Corps Ground Board — a panel that includes the four Marine division commanders and the deputy commandant for plans, policies and operations — which reviews recommendations pushed up from the fleet. The board recommended that the Corps pursue the use of a new automatic rifle in September 2001, Cantwell said.


Then came the attacks on 9/11.

The SAW played a prominent role in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. But SysCom continued to move steadily toward fielding a weapon that could replace it. That competition took a major step in December with the naming of the four finalists.

“The idea is that it’s supposed to bridge the gap between the M16 and a machine gun for small units and fire teams,” Cantwell said. “What we found was that the SAW gunner ends up slowing down an assault, or the SAW gunner ends up getting put in a support fire position, neither one of which is really the ideal use for a fire team.”

In the coming years, the Corps plans to reduce the number of SAWs in the Corps from 11,381 weapons to about 8,000, officials said, causing a variety of changes for grunts.

“The leadership within the infantry community will have to adjust training and [tactics, techniques and procedures] for the IAR,” Smith said. “The Marine Corps spent a long time thinking about this, and the infantry community in particular has spent a long time thinking about this and debating this and understanding what capabilities we wanted out of a weapons system.”

The fielding of the IAR also will have implications on the rifle range, where automatic riflemen will be required to qualify with the new weapon, Cantwell said.

“When a Marine goes to a rifle range and he’s an automatic rifleman, he will be taking his IAR to the rifle range,” Cantwell said. “He won’t be turning his IAR in and drawing a service rifle, which is what he has to do now if he’s a SAW gunner.”

Suppressive fire suppressed

Marines will still use SAWs in many situations, especially for airfield security or overwatch from towers, Marine officials said. But on basic patrols, Marines are likely to find themselves with an IAR in their squad, like it or not.

One infantry corporal with Camp Pendleton-based 1st Marine Regiment said that without the SAW, things would have been even more difficult when he deployed to Karma, Iraq, in 2006, considered by many to be the most dangerous city in the country at the time.

“If we wouldn’t have had it, we wouldn’t have had enough firepower to know what to do,” he said. “With the SAW, you’ve got a 200-round drum. I’d much rather have 200 rounds ready to go than to have to reload all the time. Not every shot is going to be on target, you know what I mean? I’d rather have more firepower, especially in an ambush.”

Wilcox and the corporal also said that any weight advantage achieved could be negated because Marines will need to carry more ammo to make up for the loss of the drums.


“How many magazines are you going to make me carry on my flak?” the corporal said.

Smith and Cantwell said they understand those concerns, and believe it comes with Marines finding comfort in what’s familiar.

“From personal experience, I went into the fleet as a second lieutenant not [long] after the transition from the M60 to the M240 Golf,” Smith said. “My machine gunners complained about the M240 Golf because when it broke, they didn’t know how to fix it, whereas they had years and years of experience [of learning] how to use bailing wire or whatever to get the M60 working again.”

Cantwell said it will take training to make Marines familiar and comfortable with what comes next.

“The biggest problem is it’s a mentality issue, and the issue [that] a 30-round magazine will go through too quickly,” Cantwell said. “That’s very true — if you use the same mentality that we use right now with the SAW, which is to pull the trigger at everything.

“There will be some training that goes into this,” he said. “We’re looking for a well-aimed shot, and then occasionally shooting a burst into a troop formation or an area target as opposed to what we do now, where we’re much more (laying) area fire with the SAW.”
 

Rucus Sunday

Veteran Member
Help me out here, vets. Way back when I was in (mid-70s), a Squad Automatic Weapon was a big .30 cal belt-gun that was usually assigned to the neanderthal on the team to carry. And now they are proposing a 5.56 (M-16) round with a standard 30-rd mag to replace it? Am I reading this right?
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Help me out here, vets. Way back when I was in (mid-70s), a Squad Automatic Weapon was a big .30 cal belt-gun that was usually assigned to the neanderthal on the team to carry. And now they are proposing a 5.56 (M-16) round with a standard 30-rd mag to replace it? Am I reading this right?

M1918 BAR later in tandem with M1919A6--->M-14 with bipod and selector installed---->M-16A1 with bipod and or M-60----->SAW M249-------->IAR w/M249 or other replacement as applicable. That's the evolution IIRC.
 

Rucus Sunday

Veteran Member
Thanks HC. I was familiar with the M60. Fired it some, I think it was 7.62 NATO? So for those in the know, how does this M249 compare with the old M60? That was a kick-arse weapon from what I remember of it.
 

Worrier King

Inactive
30 rounds replacing 200 rounds?
This must be the same brain trust that went from the .45 to the 9mm of the Army's sidearm.
 

Palmetto

Son, Husband, Father
Someday we are going to fight a war that isn't urban (re: Afghanistan.) There is a place for a .30 cal SAW.

"When you are wounded and left on Afghanistan's plains,
And the women come out to cut up what remains,
Just roll to your rifle and blow out your brains,
And go to your Gawd like a soldier." --Kipling

Palmetto
 

Kokoro

Contributing Member
The SAW fires 5.56. When I carried one it was given to the senior/most experienced rifleman who was not the fireteam leader. They do give an incredibly large volume of fire power compared to the rifle. But they are known to have reliability issues. Also belt fed ammo takes forever to unlink and stuff into mags. It is more sensible to sacrifice some volume to have a gun that will stay in the fight, more times than not. There is also commonality of mags. Plus they are bulky and hinder mobility. Quality vs Quantity. Refer to the Marine Corps Rifleman's Creed. Just a few points that come to mind.

I only wonder if the new H&K is that much more robust than a standard service rifle. If so, give all the rifleman one.

In the end, they should listen to the troops input on the ground who are getting results. If it aint broke dont fix it.
 
Last edited:

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Someday we are going to fight a war that isn't urban (re: Afghanistan.) There is a place for a .30 cal SAW.

"When you are wounded and left on Afghanistan's plains,
And the women come out to cut up what remains,
Just roll to your rifle and blow out your brains,
And go to your Gawd like a soldier." --Kipling

Palmetto

There's one already in inventory, the FN MK 48. And I'm sure that KAC can make over Eugene Stoner's LMG to 7.62X51 mm from the new rendition they're putting out in 5.56X45 mm.
 

bigrogb

Inactive
The machine gun in all conventional services are broken down light, medium and heavy:

LMG- the m249 SAW 5.56
MMG- the m240B (replaced the old vietnam era m-60) 7.62
HMG- the m2 .50 CAL

I don't know why you would replace a LMG with a high cyclic rate(750–1,000 rounds/minute), and belt round fed capabilites with a juiced up M-4 variant.....makes no sense to me...

They will loose the ability to throw lead down range(suppresive fire) at the squad level. There are usually only 2 240B per PLT and 2 M249's per squad.

I think the m249 isnt really that bad of a weapon system, i carried one for years and as long as you took care of it, and fed it clean belts, it ran well.(NOT MAGIZINES.....didnt feed woth a shi!) The barrell would get hot cherry red after about 600 rounds but we all carried spares.

You just cant replace the suppresive fire, belt fed capabilities with a m-4 variant IMHO.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
The machine gun in all conventional services are broken down light, medium and heavy:

LMG- the m249 SAW 5.56
MMG- the m240B (replaced the old vietnam era m-60) 7.62
HMG- the m2 .50 CAL

I don't know why you would replace a LMG with a high cyclic rate(750–1,000 rounds/minute), and belt round fed capabilites with a juiced up M-4 variant.....makes no sense to me...

They will loose the ability to throw lead down range(suppresive fire) at the squad level. There are usually only 2 240B per PLT and 2 M249's per squad.

I think the m249 isnt really that bad of a weapon system, i carried one for years and as long as you took care of it, and fed it clean belts, it ran well.(NOT MAGIZINES.....didnt feed woth a shi!) The barrell would get hot cherry red after about 600 rounds but we all carried spares.

You just cant replace the suppresive fire, belt fed capabilities with a m-4 variant IMHO.

Apparently the Army isn't going this route because the majority IIRC (light or Ranger I think are still 13 man?) of their squads are 9 instead of 13 man (as the Marines have theirs organized) so they feel they need the fire volume available with the belt fed M249.
 

Lone Wolf

Lives on TB
Well, this sure as **ll dates me!

The old M-1 Gerrand, .30 cal. You could give it mud baptism and then knock out targets 600 yards distant with a peep site.

The .50 cal. You could drop the rounds into the target, miles away. Worked exceptionally well with traces that way, day or night. I loved that "butterfly" trigger. made life so easy.

The .30 cal. machine gun, (air-cooled) was like fireing a garden hose. You had to remember to space out your groups so as not to melt the barrel. Smooth weapon. accurate as **ll.

BAR. .30 cal. great weapon. Did a **ll of a job.

Lets not forget the old .45 cal "grease gun." Great for close in stuff.

The .30 cal carbine was not all that accurate, but again, good for close in stuff.

And now the sweet heart. That .45 cal side arm. Good fire arm. What you hit, went down.

Now, most of these guns would work if they got dirty during a fire fight.

They seemed to always come through.

I don't know a thing about this or that new weapon, NATO this NATO that.

I guess I have to accept that these new weapons are better....I guess...

lw
 

Dozdoats

Deceased
H&K. BECAUSE YOU SUCK- AND WE HATE YOU!

dd

eta- I realize the above might be a bit cryptic for some. So here's the explanation, from the horse's mouth so to speak. And Larry's book (Monster Hunter International- just follow the link below) is great, too- buy a copy if you don't have it already!

http://larrycorreia.wordpress.com/2007/10/09/hk-because-you-suck-and-we-hate-you/

HK. Because you suck. And we hate you.
Posted on October 9, 2007 by correia45

An open letter to the gun community from HK’s marketing department: In a world of compromises, some people put the bullets in the magazine backwards…But it doesn’t matter, because our gun is on the cover of the Rainbow Six video games. Look how cool that SEAL coming out of the water looks… If you buy a $2,000 SOCOM, you will be that cool of an operator too. And chicks will dig you.

At HK, we stuck a piston on an AR15, just like a bunch of other companies have done, dating back to about 1969. However ours is better, because we refuse to sell it to civilians. Because you suck, and we hate you.
Our XM8 is the greatest rifle ever developed. It may melt, and it doesn’t fit any accessories known to man, but that is your fault. If you were a real operator, you would love it. Once again, look at Rainbow Six, that G36 sure is cool isn’t it? Yeah, you know you want one.And by the way, check out our new HK45. We decided that humans don’t need to release the magazine with their thumbs. If you were a really manly teutonic operator, you would be able to reach the controls. Plus we’ve fired 100,000,000 rounds through one with zero malfunctions, and that was while it was buried in a lake of molten lava, on the moon. If you don’t believe us, it is because you aren’t a real operator.

By the way, our cheap, mass-produced, stamped sheet metal guns like the G3 and MP5 are the bestest things ever, and totally worth asinine scalpers prices, but note that cheap, mass-produced, stamped sheet metal guns from other countries are commie garbage. Not that it matters, because you’re civilians, so we won’t sell them to you anyway. Because you suck, and we hate you, but we know you’ll be back. We can beat you down like a trailer park wife, but you’ll come back, you always do.
Buy our stuff.
Sincerely
HK Marketing Department

HK. Because you suck. And we hate you.


I don’t know if you can tell, but I’m not the biggest fan of H und K. I posted that letter on THR a long time ago as a joke, but it sure did manage to tick a lot of people off. Ironically, the tag line, HK. Because you suck. And we hate you, has been popping up in various places ever since.

Sure, they’re decently reliable, decently accurate guns, but they’re massively overpriced and overrated by legions of fan boys. One of the most frustrating things about dealing with gun people on the interweb is that folks tend to pick a brand, and then base some of their self-esteem on that brand. Kind of like rabid sports fans who feel the need to burn cars if their team wins, or loses, or they just felt like burning stuff. Say something negative about that team to one of those rabid fans, and you’re probably going to get beat up. Likewise, if you say anything negative about the Teutonic superiority of HK, people get mad at you.
Well, I love hate mail, so here goes.

For each of their wunder guns, you can get something else that costs a lot less, and works better, and has ergonomics designed by people that actually shoot. HK came about when some Nazis fled to Spain and built the Cetme. But Cetme doesn’t sound very tough, does it? So they went back to Germany and became H and K, and if you call it H and K, fan boys will get mad, and insist that it is HK, because manly Teutonic operators and Navy SEALs don’t have time to say the word And. So HK rose to prominence by building the G3, which is what the Germans call the Cetme.

Now the G3 is a decent rifle. It is a cheap, stamped sheet metal, battle rifle. It has terrible ergonomics, with a hard to use safety, (and this is coming from a guy with gorilla hands), and difficult to use charging handle. It is reliable, because of the roller locking bolt that destroys your brass, and recoils worse than other competing .308 rifles. The FAL smokes the G3, and the only reason the G3 exists is because the Germans were too proud to pay royalties to those uppity Belgians.

The G3 can be really accurate, if you weld a bunch of metal to the sides of it, stick on a nice barrel, and jack the price up $10,000. And no, that’s not a typo. The PSG1 is absurdly priced, and the cheaper version, the MSG90 is proof that if make anything absurdly heavy enough, it can be accurate.

There is a collapsible stock available, which is awesome, if you like getting hit in the face with a piece of rebar, which is what their $400 stock feels like when you shoot it. Germans must be tougher than we are or something.

Other stamped, sheet metal guns exist, but HK fan boys mock those as commie garbage. See, if you build a cheap gun, but it is from Germany, then it is superior, but if you build a stamped gun in the eastern block (a hundred miles from Germany) then it is commie garbage.

But what brought HK to international fame and the cover of Dick Marcinko books (for example, Rogue Force Delta Green Team 7 Ninja Force Alpha II: The beginning) was the G3s little brother, the MP5. Take a G3, shrink it, and chamber it in 9mm. At the time, CQB doctrine was to use 9mm subguns. Now the MP5 is a neat little gun. I have two. They work well, and if compared to the other subguns of the day, like the Uzi or the Mac, then the MP5 was a lot easier to use, easier to hit with, and was decently reliable.

The MP5 became famous when the SAS used them to kick the living hell out of some bad guys at the Iranian embassy. This was marketing gold, and HK rode the wave. Pretty soon everybody wanted an MP5. It was what all the cool kids were using. Soon every video game and action movie was filled with HK stuff. HK may have overrated guns, but they’ve got the best marketing department in the gun business, and they milked that fee cow until it was dry.

But the MP5 isn’t as great as people make them out to be. They still malfunction. (if you’re favorite gun hasn’t malfed, you haven’t shot it enough). The mags are hard to insert on a closed bolt. Safety still sucks. Most versions don’t have a bolt hold open. Honestly, if I had to get into a gunfight with a subgun, then I would rather have my PPsH.

HK long guns were mostly unobtainable to US civilians, primarily because HK hates the civilian market. If you don’t believe me, go talk to them at SHOT show, and watch them sneer at regular people. They can’t help themselves. But like all unobtainable things, like Ferraris, and super models, regular folks start to imagine these unobtainable things as perfection, when really they’re just an expensive car that spends most of its time in the shop, or a chick with mental problems and Bulimia. That’s what happened with HK. Their products took on this aura of coolness amongst the fans, that just isn’t real.

For example, go to any thread on the internet where somebody brings up “What is the Best Rifle EVAR!” and there is a poll. On the poll will be some HK long guns that 99.85% of the gun owning public has never seen, let alone shot, but those guns will have the most votes, because the HK marketing department told you how awesome they are.

Read up about the XM8 on most gun boards. According to the interweb, the XM8 is the finest combat implement of all time. In actuality it is a plastic AR18, that tends to melt, break, and is universally loathed by the Army staff that had to test it. It takes bizarre attachments, so no US accessories will work. They took the G36, which is basically a blah rifle, used by a handful of countries that don’t ever actually shoot people, and uglied it up so that it looks like the demented lovechild of Bloaty the Pizza Hog and a Super-Soaker.

Or the HK416. According to the internet, the HK416 is the best gun EVER! It is called THE AWESOME. Lightning bolts of coolness fly from the gun and smite your enemies with Teutonic fury! However you can’t have one, because you’re a civilian, ergo, you suck. And HK hates you.

The 416 is basically an AR with a gas piston, which has been done by like ten companies now, but somehow the HK is better, because it was on Future Weapons, and HK won’t sell it to civilians. In fact, a couple of 416s slipped out into civilian hands, and HK freaked out about it. There is no legal reason that 416 uppers can’t be sold, but HK despises regular people, and the idea of you having their long guns offends them.

You can get civilian HK long guns, once in a while, when HK feels like it, but they’re usually hyper-neutered and over priced. Hell, the last ones were actually grey, because you know, black is too dangerous, or something.

HK’s new subgun is the UMP. They tend to break. One of our local PDs traded all of theirs in after they broke all the stocks. Cool idea, because everybody loves .45, but bad execution.

HK’s flagship pistols, the USP line, are decent polymer handguns. They are extremely reliable, that is the plus side. On the down side, their triggers universally suck, but they don’t have to. HK likes to use a square peg in a round hole, (literally) that makes the trigger pull a lot heavier and grittier than it needs to be. Why? Beats the heck out of me. The USP series should be reliable, they’re enormous.

The most annoying thing about the HK pistols is how they cost almost twice as much as every other polymer handgun on the market. Somehow being made in Germany means the USP series is worth $800-$1000, when all of the polymer guns made within a thousand miles are $400-$600. Only most of those guns tend to have better triggers, are just as reliable, and are usually more accurate.

Then there is the Mk23. Which is huge, accurate, reliable, (which it damn well better be, since it is the size and weight of a Mini-14) costs as much as a used car, huge, and is universally despised by the SF that it is issued to. Talk to anyone that is in an SF unit. The Mk23s they’ve been issued sit unused in arms room. Did I mention that it is HUGE? But that’s okay, because the HK fan boys will explain that it is an OFFENSIVE handgun. (scratches head) whatever the hell that is supposed to mean.

They are reliable, but so is a $125 Makarov. Only the Mak has a better trigger.

I have two guys that I work with that have been to the HK armorer’s school. If you think I’m biased, you should talk to them. They especially love working with the Germans. One fellow was yelled at because he had two magazines clamped together on his MP5, because “NEIN! That is not the H und K way!” Even though he had bought the mag clamp from HK. When you ask why the original MP5 doesn’t have a last shot bolt hold open, they’ll yell at you and say, “NEIN! Why would you want your enemy to know your gun is empty!” Hell, Hans, I just want to know when my gun is empty!

One friend of mine took his personal MP5, and cut an extra notch into the collapsible stock, so it would be shorter for when he was wearing his armor, and also it removed the nasty wobble that all HK collapsible stocks have. It is an easy fix, and a no-brainer that the HK should have been doing for years. Fritz at the armorer’s school damn near had an aneurism when he saw this blasphemy against his ineffectual German gods.

Look, gun owning public, just because you saw it on Future Weapons, or read about it on the internet, doesn’t make it true. For the love of John Moses Browning, before you formulate super strong opinions about a weapon, you should have at least shot the damn thing first.

Do I have anything positive to say about HK? Yes, the sneer of disdain they give you at SHOT is priceless and entertaining.
 
Last edited:

Red Baron

Paleo-Conservative
_______________
Help me out here, vets. Way back when I was in (mid-70s), a Squad Automatic Weapon was a big .30 cal belt-gun that was usually assigned to the neanderthal on the team to carry. And now they are proposing a 5.56 (M-16) round with a standard 30-rd mag to replace it? Am I reading this right?

It's a complete step backwards.

The current M-249 is an unreliable piece of junk. But this H-K solution using GI 30 round mags is very stupid and does not appear to address any real problems.

Despite much fondness even the WWII .30 cal BAR with it's 20 round magazine was not considered a sufficient base of fire for the infantry squad.

A .30 cal. belt fed gun is the way to go.
 

Jazzman

Contributing Member
I have the usp pistol that I like but I thought I would try other brands to prove to myself whether the hk is all hype. I just bought a s&w m&p45 but have not gotten to the range with it yet. I have to say the m&p fits my hand fine but only time will tell if it will beat out my hk. Price difference is about 200 dollars. I am sure s&w customer service will be the better of the two if I ever need service.

Jazzman
 

Red Baron

Paleo-Conservative
_______________
Ok, this is going to be very politically incorrect but it was and still is the most capable general purpose machine gun ever made. Originally a 7.92 mauser it is -still- in service as a 7.62 NATO with many countries.

The German MG-42

1,200 rounds per minute, stamped lightweight sheet metal design, 5 second barrel change, bipod or tripod mount, roller locking bolt, unsurpassed feed mechanism.

After trying to reinvent the wheel, this is the ultimate squad automatic weapon, ever.

Bundesarchiv_Bild_146-1983-109-14A%2C_Frankreich%2C_MG-Sch%C3%BCtze.jpg


A German Landser involved in heavy fighting in and around the French town of Caen during the summer of 1944. He is carrying an MG 42 configured as a light support weapon with a folding bipod and detachable drum magazine.

(Actually a teenage member of 12th SS Division "Hitler Jugend" which put up a an amazing defence against Commonwealth troops during the invasion of Normandy. RB)

Service history

One of the weapon's most notable features was its comparatively high rate of fire of about 1,200 rounds per minute, twice the rate of the British Vickers machine gun and American Browning at 600 round/min. At such a high rate the human ear cannot easily discern the sound of individual bullets being fired, and in use the gun makes a sound described as like "ripping cloth" and giving rise to the nickname "Hitler's buzzsaw", or, more coarsely, "Hitler's zipper" (Soviet soldiers called it the "linoleum ripper"). German soldiers called it Hitlersäge ("Hitler's saw") or "Bonesaw". The gun was sometimes called "Spandau" by British troops from the manufacturer's plates noting the district of Berlin where some were produced, much like the Germans' own World War I MG 08 had been nicknamed. Notwithstanding the MG 42's high rate of fire, the Handbook of the German Army (1940) forbade the firing of more than 250 rounds in a single burst and indicated a sustained rate of no more than 300–350 rounds per minute to minimize barrel wear and over-heating.

So distinct and terrifying was the weapon that the United States Army created training films to aid its soldiers in dealing with the psychological trauma of facing the weapon in battle. The high rate of fire resulted from experiments with preceding weapons that concluded that since a soldier only has a short period of time to shoot at an enemy, it was imperative to fire the highest number of bullets possible to increase the likelihood of a hit. This principle was also behind the Vickers GO aircraft gun. The disadvantage of this principle is that the weapon consumed exorbitant amounts of ammunition and quickly overheated its barrel, making sustained fire problematic.

Again, not politically correct, but the squad needs a full bore caliber base of fire to sustain itself on the battlefield.

We have to stop rewriting history.

Video of MG-42 firing 50 round burst,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtqRkkeiLYs

Yes, it's fast!

"Mail Call" MG-42 Test
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H3fpBUvSM3o&feature=related
 
Last edited:

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Ok, this is going to be very politically incorrect but it was and still is the most capable general purpose machine gun ever made. Originally a 7.92 mauser it is -still- in service as a 7.62 NATO with many countries.

The German MG-42

1,200 rounds per minute, stamped lightweight sheet metal design, 5 second barrel change, bipod or tripod mount, roller locking bolt, unsurpassed feed mechanism.

After trying to reinvent the wheel, this is the ultimate squad automatic weapon, ever.

Bundesarchiv_Bild_146-1983-109-14A%2C_Frankreich%2C_MG-Sch%C3%BCtze.jpg


A German Landser involved in heavy fighting in and around the French town of Caen during the summer of 1944. He is carrying an MG 42 configured as a light support weapon with a folding bipod and detachable drum magazine.

(Actually a teenage member of 12th SS Division "Hitler Jugend" which put up a an amazing defence against Commonwealth troops during the invasion of Normandy. RB)

Service history

One of the weapon's most notable features was its comparatively high rate of fire of about 1,200 rounds per minute, twice the rate of the British Vickers machine gun and American Browning at 600 round/min. At such a high rate the human ear cannot easily discern the sound of individual bullets being fired, and in use the gun makes a sound described as like "ripping cloth" and giving rise to the nickname "Hitler's buzzsaw", or, more coarsely, "Hitler's zipper" (Soviet soldiers called it the "linoleum ripper"). German soldiers called it Hitlersäge ("Hitler's saw") or "Bonesaw". The gun was sometimes called "Spandau" by British troops from the manufacturer's plates noting the district of Berlin where some were produced, much like the Germans' own World War I MG 08 had been nicknamed. Notwithstanding the MG 42's high rate of fire, the Handbook of the German Army (1940) forbade the firing of more than 250 rounds in a single burst and indicated a sustained rate of no more than 300–350 rounds per minute to minimize barrel wear and over-heating.

So distinct and terrifying was the weapon that the United States Army created training films to aid its soldiers in dealing with the psychological trauma of facing the weapon in battle. The high rate of fire resulted from experiments with preceding weapons that concluded that since a soldier only has a short period of time to shoot at an enemy, it was imperative to fire the highest number of bullets possible to increase the likelihood of a hit. This principle was also behind the Vickers GO aircraft gun. The disadvantage of this principle is that the weapon consumed exorbitant amounts of ammunition and quickly overheated its barrel, making sustained fire problematic.

Again, not politically correct, but the squad needs a full bore caliber base of fire to sustain itself on the battlefield.

We have to stop rewriting history.

Video of MG-42 firing 50 round burst,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtqRkkeiLYs

Yes, it's fast!

"Mail Call" MG-42 Test
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H3fpBUvSM3o&feature=related

Here's a couple of more recent pictures........:vik:

MG3a.jpg


mg3.jpg


uh1dmg3lafette19iw.jpg


aadapk3.jpg
 

Dredge

Inactive
I have a friend who makes and sells Mg 42s

Simple, light, and smoking fast. You can't fire only one round. try and it sounds like one but you have fired three or four Since 8 mm has disappeared he as not made any.
 
Top