Video: Robert F Kennedy Jr. on Vaccine Cover-up

gdpetti

Inactive
Comment: Kennedy wrote an article for Rolling Stone back in 2005 in which he laid out the details of the cover-up of the Simpson Wood Conference, a CDC sponsored meeting which was held in private, though it was tax-payer funded. The damage control machinery went into full swing to try to discredit the article and Kennedy. However, the facts were hard to dispute, especially after a FOIA act revealed the transcript of the meeting in which members were shocked to discover a link between Thimerosal and neurological disorders, including autism. The CDC then funded a study to cover up the link and sold off the VAERS data to private industry in order to conceal the evidence.

Vaccines biggest proponent, Dr. Paul Offit, who was also a CDC adviser, took home a fortune of at least $29 million as part of a $182 million sale by the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia royalty interest to Merck for his development of the Rotateq vaccine.

As Dr. Wakefield, who found a connection between the MMR vaccination and autism, has said:
"I was accused of going beyond the science when I suggested that parents should have single jabs until the MMR had been properly assessed for risk.

"I had assessed the data and the safety study relied upon by the Department of Health and it was derisory. It was no way as good as the research into the single jabs.

"Bernadine Healy, the former head of the US National Institute for Health, admitted they had altered evidence on the epidemiological studies conducted by the US Government to suit the official line. She admitted the evidence both the US and UK relies on is useless.

"The UK Government has a big dirty secret that it doesn't want the public to know. . . . they agreed to under write any compensation claims for the MMR. This is why they can't and won't let their position fail.

"It was inevitable I was going to be dragged in front of the GMC because I dared to question big business. They always come after those who don't toe their line."
Healy went on to say that, in the words of the CBS reporter "There is a completely expressed concern that they don't want to pursue a hypothesis because that hypothesis could be damaging to the public health community at large by scaring people." This explains why every industry and government funded research into the vaccine-autism link is fatally flawed, because they refuse to compare a completely unvaccinated population to a vaccinated one.

The lengths the vaccine industry will go to push the absurdity of vaccination, knowing its dangers, is truly breathtaking. It has been shown that simply taking Vitamin D supplements and getting enough sun exposure can ward off most cancers and prevent the flu.

But the real reasons vaccinations are being pushed, beyond money and profits, may be more nefarious. As part of the published depopulation programs it is necessary to have a compliant public willing to submit, against their own interests, to the policies of the governing elite. According to National Security Study Memorandum 200 of December 10, 1974 and authored by the U.S. National Security Council under Henry Kissinger in which a population control program was laid out, "In these sensitive relations, however, it is important in style as well as substance to avoid the appearance of coercion." Tainted vaccines whose poisons linger in the body possibly for decades before health problems emerge - or are triggered - are just one method for population control and reduction.

================
Fair use from: http://www.sott.net/articles/show/196644-Video-Robert-F-Kennedy-Jr-on-Vaccine-Cover-Up
================
 

gdpetti

Inactive
Part 2 video had a nice mention how no studies are/were done on groups that might make the vaccines look bad... such as the Amish or kids who are homeschooled and thereby don't require the mandatory school vaccines... as none of them are reported as getting sick.
 

gdpetti

Inactive
Then there's this, which is normal nowadays... hide the truth, especially from those most affected... fair use http://www.sott.net/articles/show/196726-Blackout-Military-Personnel-Banned-From-H1N1-Vaccine-Sites

Blackout: Military Personnel Banned From H1N1 Vaccine Sites

Allen McDuffee
Huffington Post
Thu, 05 Nov 2009 07:42 EST

If you want to draw attention to a problem, try hiding it. That's the strategy of several military bases when it comes to the H1N1 vaccine.

Shortly after the Pentagon announced that all Armed Services personnel would soon be facing a mandatory H1N1 vaccination program, I started receiving email from soldiers, airmen, marines and sailors because of a previous story I had written on the anthrax vaccine. Mandatory vaccine programs are a sensitive subject in the military, so it's not a huge surprise that swift and visceral reactions to the program gained speed.

With a vaccine that was so new and little known about it, like many Americans, troops were heading to the web to find answers to their very legitimate questions -- not only for themselves, but for their families who have the option of receiving the vaccine on base. What they found instead is that several websites and blogs with key information asking critical questions had been blocked from their viewing.

Among those that were repeatedly mentioned as blocked sites are the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), the site for Gary Matsumoto's book Vaccine-A, and vaccine expert Dr. Meryl Nass. NVIC is a national, non-profit founded in 1980s that, through public education, advocates "vaccine safety and informed consent protections in the mass vaccination system." Matsumoto's site contains a forum in which thousands upon thousands of service members have posted testimonies regarding their experiences with the anthrax vaccine. And Nass is one of the world's foremost experts on vaccines who has testified in front of Congressional committees -- and, I might add, never has had a malpractice suit brought against her.

The Center for Disease Control (CDC), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) sites, however, are all available for military personnel. The official word from governmental agencies is welcome but critics, regardless of whether they were considered experts, are not.

According to the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs, the only blocking of websites Pentagon-wide was in 2007, when a number of heavy-trafficked sites that "used lots of bandwidth" had to be denied to reduce the wear on networks "to ensure they continued to be available for mission requirements."

That turns out not to be entirely accurate.

Some of you may recall the reporting earlier this year when wired.com's Danger Room blog reported that the Pentagon was blocking not only YouTube, but even their own TroopTube.
When TroopTube launched last November, for instance, it was billed as an answer to the bandwidth and security concerns surrounding other video sites. TroopTube "crunches video files into several sizes and automatically plays the one that best suits viewers' Internet connection speeds," the Associated Press reported at the time. And "a Pentagon employee screens each [upload] for taste, copyright violations and national security issues."
Nonetheless, the public affairs office at the Pentagon further instructed me that "anything that may be blocked at the Service or base level should be addressed there -- it's a local issue."

Since I had the most information (and the most complaints) about Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Ohio, that's where I directed my questions. After repeated email and phones calls, nearly two weeks later a spokesperson for Wright-Patterson told me that:
The Air Force general policy is all websites are placed into categories based upon their content and intended audience. All unethical categories are blocked as are any sites that are uncategorized. Currently the sites referenced are blocked because they are uncategorized.
A wholly unsatisfactory answer that side-stepped the question, I took this statement to mean that blocking these websites had nothing to do with bandwidth use as in the Pentagon statement and everything to do with the content.

I asked the follow-up question: Since this is a recent decision to block them, why would they not just be categorized rather than being uncategorized? As a result, they would not be blocked for educational purposes of service personnel who have a mandatory H1N1 vaccination program?

Wright-Patterson did not respond to this question.

Making sure that servicemen and servicewomen consent to the vaccine and are informed is apparently not a concern for the Department of Defense. But the message is very clear for one service member who contacted me: "All you need to know is what we're telling you, so shut up and take the vaccine with no questions asked."

Nass, one of the experts whose site has been blocked, points out the real shame in all of this: "It's unfortunate that the service members who are defending our civil rights are not afforded the same consideration."
 
Top