(SCI) CME's and 19.5

This is more than a little abstract, but it could directly relate as to WHY the sun is exploding, and the planets changing right in front of us.

Fair Use: From Hoagland's Enterprisemission.com

[Acknowledgments: the author wishes to extend deep appreciation to Lt. Col. T.E. Bearden (U.S. Army, Ret.) for his many years of historical research and technical analysis, which have made key aspects of this proposal possible; to Marianne Shenefield for her long collaboration in exploring practical applications of James Clerk Maxwell's pioneering interest in "hyperdimensional consciousness"; and to Rhonda Eklund -- for rediscovering Maxwell's original "hyperdimensional poetry."]


http://enterprisemission.com/hyper1.html

The cornerstone of the hyperdimensional model (as applied to the problem of "unexplained" astrophysical energy sources) is that historically, there is a perfectly natural explanation for such "anomalous energy" appearing in celestial bodies ... which, unfortunately, hasn't been seriously considered by Science for over 100 years:

The existence of unseen hyperspatial realities ... that, through information transfer between dimensions, are the literal "foundation substrate" maintaining the reality of everything in this dimension.

The mathematical and physical parameters required for such "information/energy gating" into this spatial dimension from potential "n-dimensions" were primarily founded in the pioneering work of several 19th Century founders of modern mathematics and physics: among these, German mathematician Georg Riemann; Scottish physicist Sir William Thompson (who would eventually be Knighted by the British Crown as "Baron Kelvin of Largs" for his scientific and technological contributions); Scottish physicist James Clerk Maxwell; and British mathematician Sir William Rowan Hamilton.

In 1867 Thompson, following decades of inquiry into the fundamental properties of both matter and the space between, proposed a radical new explanation for the most fundamental properties of solid objects -- the existence of "the vortex atom." This was in direct contradiction to then prevailing 19th Century theories of matter, in which atoms were still viewed as infinitesimal "small, hard bodies [as] imagined by [the Roman poet] Lucretius, and endorsed by Newton ..." Thompson's "vortex atoms" were envisioned, instead, as tiny, self-sustaining "whirlpools" in the so-called "aether" -- which Thompson and his 19th Century contemporaries increasingly believed extended throughout the Universe as an all-pervasive, incompressible fluid.


Even as Thompson published his revolutionary model for the atom, Maxwell, building on Thompson's earlier explorations of the underlying properties of this "aetheric fluid," was well on the way to devising a highly successful "mechanical" vortex model of the "incompressible aether" itself, in which Thompson's vortex atom could live -- a model derived in part from the laboratory-observed elastic and dynamical properties of solids. Ultimately, in 1873, he would succeed in uniting a couple hundred years of electrical and magnetic scientific observations into a comprehensive, overarching electromagnetic theory of light vibrations ... carried across space by this "incompressible and highly stressed universal aetheric fluid ..."

Maxwell's mathematical basis for his triumphant unification of these two great mystery forces of 19th Century physics were "quaternions" -- a term invented (adopted would be a more precise description) in the 1840s by mathematician Sir William Rowan Hamilton, for "an ordered pair of complex numbers" (quaternion = four). Complex numbers themselves, according to Hamilton's clarifications of long-mysterious terms such as "imaginary" and "real" numbers utilized in earlier definitions, were nothing more than "pairs of real numbers which are added or multiplied according to certain formal rules." In 1897, A.S. Hathaway formally extended Hamilton's ideas regarding quaternions as "sets of four real numbers" to the idea of four spatial dimensions, in a paper entitled "Quaternions as numbers of four-dimensional space," published in the Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society [4 (1887), 54-7].

It is obvious from Maxwell's own writings that, even before Hathaway's formalization, his choice of quaternions as mathematical operators for his electromagnetic theory was based on his belief that three-dimensional physical phenomena (including even perhaps the basis of human consciousness itself) are dependent upon higher dimensional realities. For, in honor of another great mathematician of the time, multi-dimensional geometer Arthur Cayley, Maxwell wrote ...


"Oh WRETCHED race of men, to space confined!
What honour can ye pay to him, whose mind
To that which lies beyond hath penetrated?
The symbols he hath formed shall sound his praise,
And lead him on through unimagined ways
To conquests new, in worlds not yet created.


First, ye Determinants! In ordered row
And massive column ranged, before him go,
To form a phalanx for his safe protection.
Ye powers of the nth roots of - 1!
Around his head in ceaseless* cycles run,
As unembodied spirits of direction.


And you, ye undevelopable scrolls!
Above the host wave your emblazoned rolls,
Ruled for the record of his bright inventions.
Ye cubic surfaces! By threes and nines
Draw round his camp your seven-and-twenty lines-
The seal of Solomon in three dimensions.






March on, symbolic host! With step sublime,
Up to the flaming bounds of Space and Time!
There pause, until by Dickenson depicted,
In two dimensions, we the form may trace
Of him whose soul, too large for vulgar space,
In n dimensions flourished unrestricted."


-- James Clerk Maxwell
To the Committee of the Cayley Portrait Fund -- 1887


Confirmation that Maxwell's "hyper-dimensional" inquiries extended far beyond "mere" physical interactions can be seen from another of his "unknown" poems ...
"My soul is an entangled knot,
Upon a liquid vortex wrought
By Intellect in the Unseen residing.
And thine doth like a convict sit,


With marlinspike untwisting it,
Only to find its knottiness abiding;
Since all the tool for its untying
In four-dimensional space are lying."


In another work ("The Aether," 1876), Maxwell underscored the "ultimate" significance of these inquiries ...


"Whether this vast homogeneous expanse of isotropic matter [the aether] is fitted not only to be a medium of physical Interaction between distant bodies, and to fulfill other physical functions of which, perhaps we have as yet no conception, but also as the authors of The Unseen Universe seem to suggest, to constitute the material organism of beings excercising functions of life and mind as high or higher than ours are at resent, is a question far transcending the limits of physical speculation ..."


This startling connection -- between Maxwell's demonstrably deep interest in questions "hyperdimensional," including his direct homage to one of his scientific mentors', Arthur Cayley's hyperdimensional geometry (the "27 lines on the general cubic surface" problem -- see diagram, right); and our rediscovery over a century later of that same geometry ... at a place called "Cydonia" ... on Mars -- is nothing short of astonishing. But, if you doubt such a compelling connection, just reread those key lines--


"...Ye cubic surfaces! By threes and nines, Draw round his camp your seven-and-twenty lines- The seal of Solomon in three dimensions [emphasis added] .."
Which, of course, are nothing less than the geometrical and mathematical underpinnings of the infamous "circumscribed tetrahedral latitude" memoralized all over Cydonia ... 19.5 degrees, the identical, hyper-dimensional quaternion geometry whose physical effects (see below) we have now rediscovered all across the solar system ... and beyond!

Dragonslayer;

I have not finished reading at:
http://enterprisemission.com/hyper1a.html

But I am wondering what grad school did these folks not go too...

4 dimensional tensor calculus is the back bone of relativistic theory... and N dimensional calculus is needed for much of chaos theroy..

I must admit, I have a fondness for the old manuscripts, and have had the privalige of reading a lot of the original papers from the late 1800's thru today by my privalages in the Stanford and Berkeley librarys... Many good ideas that do deserve to be looked at again, if only for the beauty they have....

But I am worried that these folks (at the enterprise mission.com) may have dropped out of high school, much less grad school...

Oh well, let the debate ebb and flow, that is where new ideas come from.. REALLY I do love the debate!

Helium

Does this relate to the "Plasma model" of the solar system/universe? Not that I understand that, but I stumbled asross it on the net one day.

Helium

I will keep posting. The writer of this article has won science awards and was the science advisor and tv commentator to Walter Cronkite during pretty well all the early Nasa space launches.

Part II

http://enterprisemission.com/hyper1a.html


Hubble's New "Runaway Planet":
A Unique Opportunity for Testing
the Exploding Planet Hypothesis and
... Hyperdimensional Physics
Part I
In a tragedy for science (if not for society in general) whose outlines we are only now beginning to appreciate, after Maxwell's death, two other 19th Century "mathematical physicists" -- Oliver Heaviside and William Gibbs -- "streamlined" Maxwell's original equations down to four simple (if woefully incomplete!) expressions. Because Heaviside openly felt the quaternions were "an abomination" -- never fully understanding the linkage between the critical scalar and vector components in Maxwell's use of them to describe the potentials of empty space ("apples and oranges," he termed them) -- he eliminated over 200 quaternions from Maxwell's original theory in his attempted "simplification."

[Oliver Heaviside, described by Scientific American (Sept. 1950) as "self-taught and ... never connected with any university ... had [however] a remarkable and inexplicable ability (which was possessed also by Newton and Laplace ...) to arrive at mathematical results of considerable complexity without going through any conscious process of proof ..." According to other observers, Heaviside actually felt that Maxwell's use of quaternions and their description of the "potentials" of space was "... mystical, and should be murdered from the theory ..." which -- by drastically editing Maxwell's original work after the latter's untimely death (from cancer), excising the scalar component of the quaternions and eliminating the hyperspatial characteristics of the directional (vector) components -- Oliver Heaviside effectively accomplished singlehanded.]

This means, of course, that the four surviving "classic" Maxwell's Equations -- which appear in every electrical and physics text the world over, as the underpinnings of all 20th Century electrical and electromagnetic engineering, from radio to radar, from television to computer science, if not inclusive of every "hard" science from physics to chemistry to astrophysics that deals with electromagnetic radiative processes -- never appeared in any original Maxwell' paper or treatise! They are, in fact--

"Heaviside's equations!"

Lest anyone doubt this is the case, they merely have to read a highly revealing paper on the subject by another renowned British mathematical physicist of this century, Sir Edmund Whittaker, titled simply "Oliver Heaviside" (Bulletin of the Calcutta Mathematical Society, Vol. 20, 1928-29, p.202); or, another overview of Heaviside by Paul J. Nahin, "Oliver Heaviside: Sage in Solitude" (IEEE Press, New York, 1988, p.9, note 3.).

The end result was that physics lost its promising theoretical beginnings to becoming truly "hyperdimensional" physics ... over a century ago ... and all that that implies.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Georg Bernard Riemann mathematically initiated the 19th Century scientific community (if not the rest of Victorian society) into the "unsettling" idea of "hyperspace," on June 10, 1854. In a seminal presentation made at the University of Gottinggen in Germany, Riemann put forth the first mathematical description of the possibility of "higher, unseen dimensions ..." under the deceptively simple title: "On the Hypotheses Which Lie at the Foundation of Geometry."

Reimann's paper was a fundamental assault on the 2000-year old assumptions of "Euclidian Geometry" -- the ordered, rectilinear laws of "ordinary" three dimensional reality. In its place, Reimann proposed a four-dimensional reality (of which our 3-D reality was merely a "subset"), in which the geometric rules were radically different, but also internally self-consistent. Even more radical: Reimann proposed that the basic laws of nature in 3-space, the three mysterious forces then known to physics -- electrostatics, magnetism and gravity -- were all fundamentally united in 4-space, and merely "looked different" because of the resulting "crumpled geometry" of our three-dimensional reality ...

In terms of actual physics, Reimann was suggesting something clearly revolutionary: a major break with Newton's "force creates action-at-a-distance" theories of the time, which had been proposed to explain the "magical" properties of magnetic and electrical attraction and repulsion, gravitationally-curved motions of planets ... and falling apples, for over 200 years; in place of Newton, Reimann was proposing that such "apparent forces'" are a direct result of objects moving through 3-space "geometry" ... distorted by the intruding geometry of "4-space!"

It is clear that Maxwell and other "giants" of 19th Century physics (Kelvin, for one), as well as an entire contemporary generation of 19th Century mathematicians (like Cayle, Tait, etc.) , took Reimann's ideas very much to heart; Maxwell's original selection of 4-space quaternions as the mathematical operators for his force equations and descriptions of electrical and magnetic interaction, clearly demonstrate his belief in Reimann's approach; and, his surprising literary excursions into poetry -- vividly extolling the implications of "higher-dimensional realities" ... including musings on their relationship to the ultimate origin of the human soul (above) -- emphatically confirm this outlook.

So, how can modern "hyperdimensional physicists" -- like Michio Kaku, at City College of the City University of New York -- representative of an entirely new generation of physical scientists now reexamining these century-old implications of "hyperspatial geometries" for generating the basic laws of Reality itself, almost casually claim:

"... In retrospect, Reimann's famous lecture was popularized to a wide audience via mystics, philosophers and artists, but did little to further our understanding of nature ... First, there was no attempt to use hyperspace to simplify the laws of nature. Without Reimann's original guiding principle -- that the laws of nature become simple in higher dimensions -- scientists during this period were groping in the dark. Reimann's seminal idea of using geometry -- that is, crumpled hyperspace -- to explain the essence of a a force' was forgotten during those years ... The mathematical apparatus developed by Reimann became a province of pure mathematics, contrary to Reimann's original intentions. Without field theory, you cannot make any predictions with hyperspace [emphasis added]..."

-- M. Kaku, "Hyperspace"
[ Doubleday (Anchor Books): New York, 1994]

Kaku's statement belies the entire "modern" outlook on 19th Century physics, and leaves the distinct impression of an apparently unconscious "bias" similar to Heaviside's, regarding Maxwell's actual treatment of such matters; certainly, in completely ignoring Maxwell's true discussion of the importance of the underlying four-dimensional "scalar potentials" for creating such "fields." And remember: Heaviside also thought of such "potentials" as ... "mystical ..."

The use of little-known Hamiltonian 4-space quaternions, to represent the effect of "scalar potentials" on electric charges (as opposed to Heaviside's vectorial descriptions of direct "electric force fields") obviously have led to great confusion; because ... Maxwell's "scalar potentials" are, of course, nothing short of exactly what Reimann initially proposed--

Quantifiable "geometric spatial distortions" ... the exact marriage of hyperspatial geometry and field theory that Kaku and others mistakenly believe (because they're basing their analysis on Heaviside's surviving vectorial version of Maxwell's original "Equations") is totally missing from this greatest achievement of 19th Century physics!



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The major source of confusion surrounding Maxwell's actual Theory, versus what Heaviside reduced it to, is its math -- a notation system perhaps best described by H.J. Josephs ("The Heaviside Papers found at Paignton in 1957," Electromagnetic Theory by Oliver Heaviside, Including an account of Heaviside's unpublished notes for a fourth volume, and with a forward by Sir Edmund Whittaker, Vol. III, Third Edition, Chelsea Publishing Co., New York, 1971).

According to Josephs:


"Hamilton's algebra of quaternions, unlike Heaviside's algebra of vectors, is not a mere abbreviated mode of expressing Cartesian analysis, but is an independent branch of mathematics with its own rules of operation and its own special theorems. A quaternion is, in fact, a generalized or hypercomplex number ... [emphasis added]"

And, you will remember, in 1897 Hathaway published a paper specifically identifying these hypercomplex numbers as "... numbers in four-dimensional space" (above). Thus, modern physics' apparent ignorance of Maxwell's 19th Century success -- a mathematically-based, four-dimensional "field-theory" -- would seem to originate from a basic lack of knowledge of the true nature of Hamilton's quaternion algebra itself!


[Apparently, unless a "hyperdimensional theory" is narrowly expressed in terms of a separate technique Reimann himself invented for his own N-dimensional mapping -- the so-called "metric tensor" -- modern physicists don't seem to be able to recognize it as a valid higher-dimensional model ... not even when it was written in its own, specifically-designed, four-dimensional mathematical notation! (Reimann's "metric tensor," BTW, is essentially a graphical checkerboard composed, for a 4-space description, of 16 numbers defining, for instance, field strength at each point in that four-dimensional space. It is NOT written in quaternions.)

And, unless you track down an original 1873 copy of Maxwell's "Treatise," there is no easy way to verify the existence of Maxwell's "hyperdimensional" quaternion notation; for, by 1892, the Third Edition incorporated a "correction" to Maxwell's original use of "scalar potentials" (contributed by George Francis Fitzgerald -- whom Heaviside heavily admired) -- thus removing a crucial distinction between 4-space "geometric potential," and a 3-space "vector field," from all subsequent "Maxwellian theory." Which is why Kaku apparently doesn't realize that Maxwell's original equations were, in fact, the first geometric 4-space field theory ... expressed in specific 4-space terms ... the language of quaternions!

Just another measure of Heaviside's effectiveness ...]




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

One of the difficulties of proposing a "higher dimension" is that, inevitably, people (and scientists are people!), will ask: "Ok, where is it? Where is the fourth dimension' ..?"

One of the most persistent objections to the 4-space geometries of Reimann, Cayley, Tait ... and Maxwell, was that no experimental proof of a "fourth dimension" was readily apparent; one of the more easily understandable aspects of "higher dimensionality" was that, a being from a "lower dimension" (a two-dimensional "Flatlander," for instance) entering our "higher" three-dimensional reality, would appear to vanish instantly from the lower-dimensional world (and, consequently, appear just as suddenly in the higher dimension -- but geometrically distorted.) When she returned to her own dimension, she would just as "magically" reappear ...

Unfortunately (or fortunately, depending on your perspective ...) to the scientific mind, people in our dimension don't just "turn a corner one day ... and promptly vanish into Reimann's fourth dimension.'" While mathematically derivable and beautifully consistent, to "experimentalists" (and all real science ultimately has to be based on verifiable, independently repeatable experiments) there seemed no testable, physical proof of "hyperdimensional physics."

Thus "hyperspace"-- as a potential solution to unifying the major laws of physics -- after Maxwell's death, and the major rewriting of his Theory, quietly disappeared ... not to resurface for almost half a century ...

Until April of 1919.

At that time, a remarkable letter was delivered to one "Albert Einstein." Written by an obscure mathematician at the University of Konigsberg in Germany, Theodr Kaluza, the letter's first few lines offered a startling solution (at least, to Einstein -- unknowing of Maxwell's original quaternion equations) to one of physics' still most intractable problems: the mathematical unification of his own theory of gravity with Maxwell's theory of electromagnetic radiation ... via introduction of a fifth dimension. (Because Einstein, in formulating the General and Special Theory of Relativity in the intervening years since Reimann, had already appropriated time as the "fourth dimension," Kaluza was forced to specify his additional spatial dimension as "the fifth." In fact, this was the same spatial dimension as the 4-space designations used by Maxwell and his colleagues in their models ... over 50 years before.)

Despite its stunning (Einstein mulled over the paper's implications for more than two years, before finally supporting its scientific publication) mathematical success, in apparently -- finally -- uniting "gravity" and "light," the same question, "OK, where is it?" was asked of Kaluza as had been asked of Reimann, over 60 years before; because, there was no overt experimental proof (for instance, people and things up and "disappearing") of the physical existence of another spatial dimension. To which Kaluza this time had a very clever answer: he proposed that this "fourth dimension" -- unlike the other three we are familiar with -- somehow had collapsed down to a tiny circle ... "smaller than the smallest atom ..."

In 1926, another essentially unknown mathematician, Oskar Klein, was investigating the peculiar implications of Kaluza's ideas in the context of the newly-invented atomic theory of "quantum mechanics." [Klein was a specialist in the truly arcane field of mathematical topology -- the higher dimensional surfaces of objects; the twisted 3-D topology of the 2-D surface of a "Klein Bottle" is named specifically in his honor]. Quantum mechanics had just been proposed a year or so before Klein's further topological investigation of Kaluza's ideas, by Max Planck and many others rebelling against perceived limitations of Maxwell's (remember, heavily sanitized by Gibbs and Heaviside) classical Electromagnetic Theory. The "quantum mechanics " theory would eventually become a highly successful (if bizarre, by common-sense standards) non-geometric effort to describe interactions between "fundamental particles," exchanging "forces" through discrete "quantitized" particles and energy in the sub-atomic world. Eventually, combining the two inquiries, Klein theorized that, if it truly existed, Kaluza's new dimension likely had somehow collapsed down to the "Planck length" itself -- supposedly the smallest possible size allowed by these fundamental interactions. However, that size was only about ... 10-33 cm long!


Thus, the main obstacle to experimental verification of the Kaluza-Klein Theory (and the reason why people simply didn't "walk into the fourth dimension"), was that quantum mechanics calculations affirmed that the only way to physically probe such an infinitesimally tiny dimension was with a new machine ... an "atom smasher." There was only one small "technical" problem ...

The energy required would exceed the output of all the power plants on Earth ... and then some!



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thus, the brief "blip" of new interest in "hyperdimensional physics" -- the discussions of Kaluza-Klein among physicists and topologists -- "dropped through the floor" by the 1930's. This occurred both because of Klein's "proof" of the apparent impossibility of any direct experimental verification of additional dimensions ... and because of the dramatic revolution then sweeping the increasingly technological world of Big Science--

The flood of "verifications"gushing forth from atom smashers all around the world, feverishly engaged in probing the new area the experimentalists apparently could verify: the multiplying populations of "fundamental particles"spawned by the bizarre mathematical world (even more bizarre than "N-dimensions") of Quantum Mechanics.

30 more years would pass ... before (almost by mathematical "accident") in 1968, the current mainstream "flap" of renewed scientific interest in "hyperspace" would be, like the legendary Phoenix, "magically" reborn -- a theory now known as "Superstrings" ... in which fundamental particles, and "fields," are viewed as hyperspace vibrations of infinitesimal, multi-dimensional strings ... From those relatively inauspicious beginnings, stretching across more than 60 years, the current focus of scientific research papers on "hyperspace" -- from continued research into updated versions of the old "Kaluza-Klein Theory"; to discussions of the much newer "Supergravity" hyperspace unification model; to the exotic "String Theory" itself -- has grown geometrically (over 5000 papers by 1994 alone, according to Michio Kaku -- see above). This much attention to a subject involving realities you can't even see, represents nothing short of a fundamental psychological revolution sweeping across a major segment of the worldwide scientific community.

For most physicists currently interested in the problem, the "Superstring" hyper-dimensional model has overwhelming advantages over all its predecessors. Besides effectively unifying all the known forces of the Universe ... from electromagnetism to the nuclear force ... in a literally beautiful "ultimate"picture of Reality, it also makes a specific prediction about the total number of N-dimensions that can form:

"Ten" (or "26," depending on the rotation of the "strings").

The bad news is: they can't be tested either ...

As all ten dimensions are curled up (in the model) inside the same experimentally unreachable "Planck length" which spelled the scientific demise of the original Kaluza-Klein ...

Impasse.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This, then is the current situation.

The "hottest" mainstream scientific theory to come along in more than half a century, the next best thing to a "Theory of Everything" (and seriously attempting to become precisely that ...), is not only a Hyperdimensional Model of Reality ... it is another one which, by its fundamental nature--

Can't scientifically be tested!

While a "hyperdimensional model" which can be tested easily -- as this paper will unequivocally show -- for over a 100 years has been systematically ignored.

Is it just us ... or is there something truly wrong with this picture?

The sun DRAWS energy from hyper space

"It is this same source of energy (in the Hyperdimensional Physics Model) that, according to our analysis, must now be primarily responsible for the radiated energies of stars ... including the Sun itself."


http://enterprisemission.com/hyper2.html



Hubble's New "Runaway Planet":
A Unique Opportunity for Testing
the Exploding Planet Hypothesis and
... Hyperdimensional Physics
Part II
Lt. Col Thomas E. Bearden, retired army officer and physicist, has been perhaps the most vocal recent proponent for restoring integrity to the scientific and historical record regarding James Clerk Maxwell -- by widely promulgating his original equations; in a series of meticulously documented papers on the subject, going back at least 20 years, Bearden has carried on a relentless one-man research effort regarding what Maxwell really claimed. His painstaking, literally thousands of man-hours of original source documentation has led directly to the following, startling conclusion:
Maxwell's original theory is, in fact, the true, so-called "Holy Grail" of physics ... the first successful unified field theory in the history of Science ... a fact apparently completely unknown to the current proponents of "Kaluza-Klein," "Supergravity," and "Superstring" ideas ....

Just how successful, Bearden documents below:


" ... In discarding the scalar component of the quaternion, Heaviside and Gibbs unwittingly discarded the unified EM/G [electromagnetic/ gravitational] portion of Maxwell's theory that arises when the translation/directional components of two interacting quaternions reduce to zero, but the scalar resultant remains and infolds a deterministic, dynamic structure that is a function of oppositive directional/translational components. In the infolding of EM energy inside a scalar potential, a structured scalar potential results, almost precisely as later shown by Whittaker but unnoticed by the scientific community. The simple vector equations produced by Heaviside and Gibbs captured only that subset of Maxwell's theory where EM and gravitation are mutually exclusive. In that subset, electromagnetic circuits and equipment will not ever, and cannot ever, produce gravitational or inertial effects in materials and equipment.
"Brutally, not a single one of those Heaviside/ Gibbs equations ever appeared in a paper or book by James Clerk Maxwell, even though the severely restricted Heaviside/Gibbs interpretation is universally and erroneously taught in all Western universities as Maxwell's theory.

"As a result of this artificial restriction of Maxwell's theory, Einstein also inadvertently restricted his theory of general relativity, forever preventing the unification of electromagnetics and relativity. He also essentially prevented the present restricted general relativity from ever becoming an experimental, engineerable science on the laboratory bench, since a hidden internalized electromagnetics causing a deterministically structured local spacetime curvature was excluded.

"Quantum mechanics used only the Heaviside/ Gibbs externalized electromagnetics and completely missed Maxwell's internalized and ordered electromagnetics enfolded inside a structured scalar potential. Accordingly, QM [quantum mechanics] maintained its Gibbs statistics of quantum change, which is nonchaotic a priori. Quantum physicists by and large excluded Bohm's hidden variable theory, which conceivably could have offered the potential of engineering quantum change -- engineering physical reality itself.

"Each of these major scientific disciplines missed and excluded a subset of their disciplinary area, because they did not have the scalar component of the quaternion to incorporate. Further, they completely missed the significance of the Whittaker approach, which already shows how to apply and engineer the very subsets they had excluded.

"What now exists in these areas are three separate, inconsistent disciplines. Each of them unwittingly excluded a vital part of its discipline, which was the unified field part. Ironically, then, present physicists continue to exert great effort to find the missing key to unification of the three disciplines, but find it hopeless, because these special subsets are already contradictory to one another, as is quite well-known to foundations physicists.

"Obviously, if one wishes to unify physics, one must add back the unintentionally excluded, unifying subsets to each discipline. Interestingly, all three needed subsets turn out to be one and the same ..."

-- T.E. Bearden, "Possible Whittaker Unification of
Electromagnetics, General Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics,"
(Association of Distinguished American Scientists
2311 Big Cove Road, Huntsville, Alabama, 35801)


Given Bearden's analysis -- what did we actually lose ... when science "inadvertently lost Maxwell ..?"


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If two key physics papers often cited by Bearden (which appeared decades after the death of Maxwell), are accurate ... we lost nothing less than--

The "electrogravitic" control of gravity itself!!

The critically-important research cited by Bearden was originally published by "Sir Edmund Whittaker" (the same cited earlier in this paper), beginning in 1903. The first was titled "On the partial differential equations of mathematical physics" (Mathematische Annalen, Vol. 57, 1903, p.333-335); the second, "On an Expression of the Electromagnetic Field due to Electrons by means of two Scalar Potential Functions" (Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, Vol.1, 1904, p. 367-372).

Whittaker, a leading world-class physicist himself, single-handedly rediscovered the "missing" scalar components of Maxwell's original quaternions, extending their (at the time) unseen implications for finally uniting "gravity" with the more obvious electrical and magnetic components known as "light." In the first paper, as Bearden described, Whittaker theoretically explored the existence of a "hidden" set of electromagnetic waves traveling in two simultaneous directions in the scalar potential of the vacuum -- demonstrating how to use them to curve the local and/or distant "spacetime" with electromagnetic radiation, in a manner directly analogous to Einstein's later "mass-curves-space" equations. This key Whittaker paper thus lays the direct mathematical foundation for an electrogravitic theory/technology of gravity control. In the second paper, Whittaker demonstrated how two "Maxwellian scalar potentials of the vacuum" -- gravitationally curving spacetime -- could be turned back into a detectable "ordinary" electromagnetic field by two interfering "scalar EM waves"... even at a distance.

Whittaker accomplished this by demonstrating mathematically that "the field of force due to a gravitating body can be analyzed, by a spectrum analysis' as it were, into an infinite number of constituent fields; and although the whole field of force does not vary with time, yet each of the constituent fields is an undulatory character, consisting of a simple-disturbance propagated with uniform velocity ... [and] the waves will be longitudinal (top) ... These results assimilate the propagation of gravity to that of light ... [and] would require that gravity be propagated with a finite velocity, which however need not be the same as that of light [emphasis added], and may be enormously greater ..." (Op. Cit., "On the partial differential equations of mathematical physics")


Remarkably, four years before Whittaker's theoretical analysis of these potentials (pun intended ...), on the evening of July 3-4, 1899, Nikola Tesla (right) -- the literal inventor of modern civilization (via the now worldwide technology of "alternating current") -- experimentally anticipated "Whittaker's interfering scalar waves" by finding them in nature; from massive experimental radio transmitters he had built on a mountain top in Colorado, he was broadcasting and receiving (by his own assertion) "longitudinal stresses" (as opposed to conventional EM "transverse waves") through the vacuum. This he was accomplishing with his own, hand-engineered equipment (produced according to Maxwell's original, quaternion equations), when he detected an interference "return" from a passing line of thunderstorms. Tesla termed the phenomenon a "standing columnar wave," and tracked it electromagnetically for hours as the cold front moved across the West (Nikola Tesla, Colorado Springs Notes 1899-1900, Nolit, Beograd, Yugoslavia, 1978 pp. 61-62).

[Many have since speculated that Tesla's many other astonishing (to the period) technological accomplishments, many of which apparently "were lost" with his death in 1942, were based on this true understanding of Maxwell's original, "hyperdimensional" electromagnetic ideas ...]

Tesla's experimental earlier detection notwithstanding, what Whittaker theoretically demonstrated years after Tesla was that future electrical engineers could also take Maxwell's original 4-space, quaternion description of electromagnetic waves (the real "Maxwell's Equations"), add his own (Whittaker's) specific gravitational potential analysis (stemming from simply returning Maxwell's scalar quaternions in Heaviside's version of "Maxwell's Equations"...), and produce a workable "unified field theory" (if not technology!) of gravity control ...

Unless by now, in some government "black project," they already have--

And what we've deliberately been "leaked" over the last seven years, in repeated video images of "exotic vehicles" performing impossible, non-Newtonian maneuvers on official NASA TV shuttle coverage ... is simply the result!

Theory is one thing (Maxwell's or Whittaker's), but experimental results are supposedly the ultimate Arbiter of Scientific Truth. Which makes it all the more curious that Tesla's four-year observational anticipation of Whittaker's startling analysis of Maxwell -- the experimental confirmation of an electromagnetic "standing columnar (longitudinal) wave" in thunderstorms -- has been resolutely ignored by both physicists and electrical engineers for the past 100 years; as have the stunning NASA TV confirmations of "something" (above) maneuvering freely in Earth orbit.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

With that as prologue, a new generation of physicists, also educated in the grand assumption that "Heaviside's Equations" are actually "Maxwell's," were abruptly brought up short in 1959 with another remarkable, equally elegant experiment -- which finally demonstrated in the laboratory the stark reality of Maxwell's "pesky scalar potentials" ... those same "mystical" potentials that Heaviside so effectively banished for all time from current (university-taught) EM theory.

In that year two physicists, Yakir Aharonov and David Bohm, conducted a seminal "electrodynamics" laboratory experiment ("Significance of Electromagnetic Potentials in Quantum Theory," The Physical Review, Vol. 115, No. 3, pp. 485-491; August, 1959). Aharonov and Bohm, almost 100 years after Maxwell first predicted their existence, succeeded in actually measuring the "hidden potential" of free space, lurking in Maxwell's original scalar quaternion equations. To do so, they had to cool the experiment to a mere 9 degrees above Absolute Zero, thus creating a total shielding around a superconducting magnetic ring [for a slightly different version of this same experiment -- see diagram; the oscillation of electrical resistance in the ring (bottom graph) is due to the changing electron "wave functions" -- triggered by the "hidden Maxwell scalar potential" created by the shielded magnet -- see text, below].

Once having successfully accomplished this non-trivial laboratory set up, they promptly observed an "impossible" phenomenon:

Totally screened, by all measurements, from the magnetic influence of the ring itself, a test beam of electrons fired by Aharonov and Bohm at the superconducting "donut," nonetheless, changed their electronic state ("wave functions") as they passed through the observably "field-free" region of the hole -- indicating they were sensing "something," even though it could NOT be the ring's magnetic field. Confirmed now by decades of other physicists' experiments as a true phenomenon (and not merely improper shielding of the magnet), this "Aharonov-Bohm Effect" provides compelling proof of a deeper "spatial strain" -- a "scalar potential" -- underlying the existence of a so-called magnetic "force-field" itself. (Later experiments revealed a similar effect with shielded electrostatic fields ...)

All of which provides compelling proof of "something else," underlying all reality, capable of transmitting energy and information across space and time ... even in the complete absence of an electromagnetically detectable 3-D spatial "field"--

Maxwell's quaternion ... hyperdimensional "potential."



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So, what does all this have to do with NASA's announcement of a "new planet?"

If a "potential" without a field can exist in space -- as Maxwell's quaternion analysis first asserted, and Aharonov-Bohm "only" a century later ultimately found -- then, as defined by Maxwell in his comparisons of the aether with certain properties of laboratory "solids," such a potential is equivalent to an unseen, vorticular (rotating) "stress" in space. Or, in Maxwell's own words (first written in 1873 ...):


"There are physical quantities of another kind [in the aether] which are related to directions in space, but which are not vectors. Stresses and strains in solid bodies are examples, and so are some of the properties of bodies considered in the theory of elasticity and in the theory of double [rotated] refraction. Quantities of this class require for their definition nine [part of the "27-line"...] numerical specifications. They are expressed in the language of quaternions by linear and vector functions of a vector ..."
-- J.C. Maxwell, "A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism,"
(Vol.1, 3rd Edition, New York, 1954)

And stresses, when they are relieved, must release energy into their surroundings ...

There is now much fevered discussion among physicists, (~100 years post-Maxwell) of the Quantum Electrodynamics Zero Point Energy (ZPE) of space -- or, "the energy of the vacuum"; to many familiar with the original works of Maxwell, Kelvin, et. al., this sounds an awful lot like the once-familiar "aether" ... merely updated and now passing under "an assumed name." Thus, creating -- then relieving -- a "stress" in Maxwell's vorticular aether is precisely equivalent to tapping the "energy of the vacuum" -- which, according to current "quantum mechanics' models," possesses a staggering amount of such energy per cubic inch of space. Even inefficiently releasing a tiny percentage of this "strain energy" into our three dimensions -- or, into a body existing in three-dimensional space -- could make it appear as if the energy was coming from nowhere ... "something from nothing." In other words, to an entire generation of students and astrophysicists woefully ignorant of Maxwell's real equations, such energy would appear as--

"Perpetual motion!"

Given the prodigious amount of "vacuum energy" calculated by modern physicists (trillions of atomic bomb equivalents per cubic centimeter ...), even a relatively minor but sudden release of such vast vacuum (aether) stress potential inside a planet ... could literally destroy it--

Finally answering the crucial astrophysical objection to the "exploded planet model" that Van Flandern has been encountering ...

"But Tom -- just how do you blow up' an entire world?!"

The answer is now obvious: via hyperdimensional "vacuum stress energy" ... ala Whittaker and Maxwell.

As we shall show, it is this "new" source of energy -- in a far more "controlled" context -- that seems also to be responsible now for not only the "anomalous infrared excesses" observed in the so-called "giant outer planets" of this solar system--

It is this same source of energy (in the Hyperdimensional Physics Model) that, according to our analysis, must now be primarily responsible for the radiated energies of stars ... including the Sun itself.

Pictures say a thousand words

I will post some pics to help illustrate the hyperdimentional effects on planets.

First this one. Just use your imagination to "pop" these inverted triangles inside any planet you want to imagine. The Points of the triangles are degrees where "extra" energy seems to pop out and have effects when the planetary system is trying to burn off some of the extra steam.

By no means are these the ONLY points where things happen on a planet, but they do reoccur there over and over which I will try to demonstrate with my limited access to data.

Since this was posted on TB2K I'm assuming it means we're all gonna die...



-TECH32-

Take this pic

and imagine those triangles inside the sun, and watch the line of WHERE the energy is erupting from.

I'm in the same boat as Tech32.

At some point could someone put all of that into okie hillbilly english so that those of us who are mere college graduates in engineering can understand it.



Then again; I guess I could just wait a little longer and see whether or not we all get fried.

Mars

Once again place the imaginary triangles into Mars and watch a planet wide event start and spread over the entire planet.

http://science.msfc.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast16jul_1.htm

Above: On June 26, 2001, the Hubble Space Telescope spotted a dust storm brewing in Hellas Basin on Mars. A day later the storm "exploded" and became a global event.

Three weeks ago a new dust storm erupted on Mars. It's the largest in 25 years and still growing. The storm is so big that amateur astronomers using modest telescopes can see it from Earth. And the cloud has raised the temperature of the frigid Martian atmosphere by a stunning 30 degrees Celsius. Now that's global warming!

Enjoying the best view of the storm is NASA's Mars Global Surveyor in orbit around the Red Planet. The spacecraft carries an instrument called "TES" -- short for Thermal Emission Spectrometer -- that can measure the temperature and dust content of the Martian atmosphere on a daily basis.

"This storm began as a small dust cloud inside the Hellas Basin, a 9-km deep impact crater in Mars's southern hemisphere," says Phil Christensen, the principal investigator for TES at Arizona State University. At first the cloud did little -- alternately growing and retreating as days passed, but never getting very large until June 27th. "That's when the storm exploded," says Christensen. "It crossed some critical threshold and really began to grow." By early July the dust cloud had spilled out of the Basin and wrapped itself around the entire planet.

Now the earth

These are the weather patterns forming after August 19th, the "big" hurricanes that all suddenly appeared in several parts of the world. Korea got hammered, as did Black Seal, and then it petered out as it hit US.

Professor Mccanney had predicted these weather patterns.

Now, place the imaginary hyperdimentional triangles inside the planet earth and compare to the relative positions of these massive weather systems.

And of course

Jupiter's new black spot.

Also appearing on or close to that magical 19.5.

The short version

Because I am not capable of understanding or explaining the long version.

Part of hyperdimentional physics is the effect that moving bodies have on each other based not on gravity or electromagnetism, but on the "angular velocity" of these spinning bodys. As they change their orbits around each other, and change their positions slightly on the ecliptic, they produce energy fields on each other.

This of course implys that OTHER bodys and solar systems also have an effect on each other.

This is a non-linear relationship. The further out a large body has, the MORE effect it has on the bodies in our solar system. Kind of like using a long bar and fulcrum.

Hoagland's group has a theory that there is indeed a large cometary/planet sized body that has an orbit that intersects ours at long intervals.

It is now moving back into our sphere of influence. The evidence abounds that most if not all the planets in our system are undergoing huge changes.

Hoagland theorizes that these changes are due to a massive influx of energy into the core of our planets. Some of the excess energy gets burned off, and often (not always) manifests at 19.5 degrees (not through some mystical mumbo jumbo, just that is the way it is).

And, according to Hoagland, as the large body keeps moving in the energy will keep accumulating INSIDE the planets and sun, until something has to give.

The earth is giving right now, hence the huge climate changes.

The sun is starting to give right now, hence the huge solar bursts of energy.

NOW....................................

These are not the only theories. There is also Jim Mccanney's theory which I will try to tie in when I get back.

Mind you, these are ideas and theories that are coalesing in my opinion. I am not trying to claim that this is absolutely correct, or the ONLY causes of what is happening.

But, I have been studying pole shifts and "Earth's in Upheaval's" for several decades, and Hoagland's theory for almost a decade now, the sun explosions and other planetary changes for the same amount of time, and recently Mccanney's work.

And much of what they have said is going to happen seems to be manifesting in a very terrible way before our eyes.

Yeah, they got my attention in a big way and NO, I am not depending on NASA to tell me the truth. They have predicted this stuff, NASA has been calling them kooks.

When NASA starts predicting this stuff instead of trying to play catch up while STILL demeaning these good folks, then I might start paying attention to them.

Also

I urge anyone who is trying to wade through the Enterprise articles to go directly to Hoagland's site because he has a lot of pics to tie in to the arguement.

And they do help.

Also, you can go here:

http://www.timebomb2000.com/vb/newreply.php?s=&action=newreply&threadid=82541

This was the original thread I was going to make my point on, but I made the mistake of mentioning Planet X in the title, and quicker than I could refresh my screen (not kidding) it was moved to wooooooooooo woooooooooo UNEX'd land, where I almost never post.

OK

One last........thing then I will go out and do my business (yes, I AM hopelessly addicted to TB - sigh).

Here is a very rough sketch that I have done. A person better with paint programs and with more time can do it better (with my blessing).

In many if not MOST cases, the big solar flares and cme's seem to originate, in my opionion, from the 19.5 areas. Not all. But you don't see that many coming straight off the equator, or from the poles.

Dragonslayer,

Glad you are hopelessly addicted.......!!

Your research is truly appreciated, not to mention, your ability to interpret for us less than educated folks!!

Thank you for sharing!!

Janice

Thanks DS. And just for the record - I've been anticipating the pole shift for a long time.

Dragon.......

I don't have much of a clue about all this, but something rang true about the sun receiving its energy from another source and not being the source of its own activity and strength.


What kind of effect and influence do you believe is being exerted on the sun? It is not gravitational, but is a energy force of some kind....is it pure light, unimpeded by physical atoms?? And how does it put energy into the core of a planet or sun?? Why the core and why does it not go around or through the planet/sun??

I guess I am an in-the-box thinker and cannot understand what energy is, though I believe the pure light/energy is what drives or is our intellect (I don't know how to put it another way).

Am wanting to learn but don't have a scientific background, so 3-letter words are easier for me to understand.

Part II

"This discovery contains major implications, not only for past geophysics and terrestrial evolution ... but for future geological and climatological events -- "Earth changes," as some have termed them. These may be driven, not by rising solar interactions or by-products of terrestrial civilization (accumulating "greenhouse gases" from burning fossil fuels), but by this same "hyperdimensional physics." If so, then learning a lot more about the mechanisms of this physics -- and quickly! -- is a critical step toward intervening and eventually controlling our future well-being, if not our destiny, on (and off!) this planet ... "


http://enterprisemission.com/hyper2a.html



Hubble's New "Runaway Planet":
A Unique Opportunity for Testing
the Exploding Planet Hypothesis and
... Hyperdimensional Physics
Part II
Since, in three dimensions, all energy eventually "degrades" to random motions -- via Kelvin and Gibb's 19th Century Laws of Thermodynamics (it's called "increasing entropy") -- "stress energy" of the aether (vacuum) released inside a material object, even if it initially appears in a coherent form -- driving, for instance, the anomalous (1400 mile-per-hour!), planet-girdling winds of distant Neptune's "jet streams" -- will eventually degrade to simple, random heat ... ultimately radiated away as "excess infrared emissions" into space. It's the initial, astrophysical conditions under which such "Maxwellian space potentials" can be released inside a planet (or a star ...), that have been the central focus of our efforts for ten years --

To create a predictive, mathematical "hyperdimensional model" of such physics.

The entire question comes down to--

"What set of known spatial conditions will slowly, predictably, release the potential strains of 4-space into 3-space' ... inside a massive world ... so that when this energy inevitably degrades to heat, its radiative signature identifies the original hyperdimensional' source?"

Fortunately, we are surrounded by almost half a dozen examples close at hand: the giant, "anomalously radiating" planets of this solar system (and some major moons). Over the past decade, as we have attempted to understand their anomalous IR radiation, one thing has become clear -- to a first order, the "infrared excesses" of the giant planets all seem to correlate very nicely with one parameter each has in common -- regardless of their individual masses, elemental compositions, or distance from the Sun:

Their total system "angular momentum."

The mass of a body and the rate at which it spins, in classical physics, determines an object's "angular momentum." In our Hyperdimensional Model, its a bit more complicated -- because objects apparently separated by distance in this (3-space) dimension are in fact connected in a "higher" (4-space) dimension; so, in the HD model, one also adds in the orbital momentum of an object's gravitationally-tethered satellites -- moons in the case of planets; planets, in the case of the Sun, or companion stars in the case of other stars.

When one graphs the total angular momentum of a set of objects -- such as the radiating outer planets of this solar system (plus Earth and Sun) -- against the total amount of internal energy each object radiates to space, the results are striking:

The more total system angular momentum a planet (or any celestial body) possesses (as defined above -- object plus satellites), the greater its intrinsic "brightness," i.e. the more "anomalous energy" it apparently is capable of "generating."

And, as can be seen from this key diagram, this striking linear dependence now seems to hold across a range of luminosity and momentum totaling almost three orders of magnitude ... almost 1000/1!

Especially noteworthy, the Earth (not "a collapsing gas giant," by any stretch of the imagination) also seems to fit precisely this empirical energy relationship: when the angular momentum of the Moon is added to the "spin momentum" of its parent planet, the resulting correlation with measurements derived from internal "heat budget" studies of the Earth are perfectly fitted to this solar-system-wide empirical relationship -- even though the Earth's internal energy is supposedly derived from "radioactive sources."

And, as can be seen from the accompanying historical comparison, this striking solar system linear relationship is actually more tightly constrained (even at this early stage) than the original Hubble "redshift data" supporting the Big Bang!





This discovery contains major implications, not only for past geophysics and terrestrial evolution ... but for future geological and climatological events -- "Earth changes," as some have termed them. These may be driven, not by rising solar interactions or by-products of terrestrial civilization (accumulating "greenhouse gases" from burning fossil fuels), but by this same "hyperdimensional physics." If so, then learning a lot more about the mechanisms of this physics -- and quickly! -- is a critical step toward intervening and eventually controlling our future well-being, if not our destiny, on (and off!) this planet ...
For the "Hyperdimensional Physics" model, this simple but powerful relationship now seems to be the equivalent of Relativity's E=MC2 : a celestial object's total internal luminosity seems dependent upon only one physical parameter:


L=mr2 = total system angular momentum (object, plus all satellites)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There is a well-known "rule of thumb" in science, perhaps best expressed by a late Noble Laureate, physicist Richard Feynman:


"You can recognize truth by its beauty and simplicity. When you get it right, it is obvious that it is right -- at least if you have any experience -- because usually what happens is that more comes out than goes in ... The inexperienced, the crackpots, and people like that, make guesses that are simple, but you can immediately see that they are wrong, so that does not count. Others, the inexperienced students, make guesses that are very complicated, and it sort of looks as if it is all right, but I know it is not true because the truth always turns out to be simpler that you thought ..."
This startling relationship -- our discovery of the simple dependence of an object's internal luminosity on its total system angular momentum -- has that "feel" about it; it is simple ... it is elegant ... in fact--

It could even be true.

But, as can be seen from examining the luminosity/angular momentum diagram again, there also appears to be one glaring exception to this otherwise strikingly linear relationship:

The Sun itself.

Independent research, involving over 30 years of attempted confirmation of the Sun's basic energy source -- in the form of solar/terrestrial observations of tiny atomic particles called "neutrinos," supposedly coming from the center of the Sun -- have left laboratory physicists and astrophysicists with a major astronomical enigma:

The Sun is not emitting anything like the number of neutrinos required by the "Standard Solar Model" for its observed energy emission; if its energy is due to "thermo-nuclear reactions" (as the Standard Model demands), then the observed "neutrino deficit" is upwards of 60%: even more remarkable, certain kinds of primary neutrinos (calculated as required to explain the bulk of the solar interior's fusion reactions, based on laboratory measurements) turn out to be simply missing altogether!

So -- what really fuels the Sun?

The answer to the Sun's apparent violation of the Standard Solar Model -- ironically, is contained in its striking "violation" of our key angular momentum/luminosity diagram:




In the Hyperdimensional Model, the Sun's primary energy source -- like the planets' -- must be driven by its total angular momentum -- its own "spin momentum," plus the total angular momentum of the planetary masses orbiting around it. Any standard astronomical text reveals that, though the Sun contains more than 98% of the mass of the solar system, it contains less than 2% of its total angular momentum. The rest is in the planets. Thus, in adding up their total contribution to the Sun's angular momentum budget -- if the HD model is correct -- we should see the Sun following the same line on the graph that the planets, from Earth to Neptune, do.

It doesn't.

The obvious answer to this dilemma is that the HD model is simply wrong.

The less obvious is that we're missing something ...

Like ... additional planets (above)!

By adding another big planet (or a couple of smaller ones) beyond Pluto (several hundred times the Earth's distance from the Sun -- below), we can move the Sun's total angular momentum to the right on the graph, until it almost intersects the line (allowing for a percentage, about 30%, of internal energy expected from genuine thermonuclear reactions ...). This creates the specific "HD prediction" that "the current textbook tally of the Sun's angular momentum is deficient because ..."




We haven't discovered all the remaining members of the solar system yet!

As a dividend, this promptly presents us with our first key test of the Hyperdimensional Model:


1) Find those planets!
The second test of the Hyperdimensional Model is that, unlike other efforts to explain anomalous planetary energy emissions via continued "planetary collapse," or "stored primordial heat," the hyperdimensional approach specifically predicts one radical, definitive observational difference from all other existing explanations--


2) HD energy generation in both planets and stars should be -- must be -- variable.
This is simply implicit in the mechanism which generates the hyperdimensional energy in the first place: ever changing hyperspatial geometry.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If the ultimate source of planetary (or stellar) energy is this "vorticular (rotating) spatial stress between dimensions" (ala Maxwell), then the constantly changing pattern (both gravitationally and dimensionally) of interacting satellites in orbit around a major planet/star must modulate that stress pattern as a constantly changing, geometrically twisted "aether" (ala Whittaker's amplifications of Maxwell). In our Hyperdimensional Model, it is this "constantly changing hyperspatial geometry" that is capable (via resonant rotations with the masses in question -- either as spin, or circular orbital motions) of extracting energy from this underlying "rotating, vorticular aether" ... and then releasing it inside material objects.

Initially, this "excess energy" can appear in many different forms -- high-speed winds, unusual electrical activity, even enhanced nuclear reactions -- but, ultimately, it must all degrade to simple "excess heat." Because of the basic physical requirement for resonance in effectively coupling a planet (or a star's) "rotating 3-D mass to the underlying 4-D aether rotation," this excess energy generation must also, inevitably, vary with time -- as the changing orbital geometry of the "satellites" interacts with the spinning primary (and the underlying, "vorticular aether"...) in and out-of-phase.

For these reasons, as stated earlier, time-variability of this continuing energy exchange must be a central hallmark of this entire "HD process."

[Incidentally, understanding this basic "hyperdimensional transfer mechanism," in terms of Maxwell's original quaternions (that describe "a rotating, vorticular, four-dimensional sponge-like aether"), immediately lends itself to creating a "Hyperdimensional Technology" based on this same mechanism.

The fundamental "violations" of current physics exhibited by so-called "free energy" machines -- from the explicitly-rotating "N-machine" to the initially frustrating time-variable aspects of "electro-chemical cold fusion"-- are now elegantly explained by appropriate application of Maxwell's original ideas.

Even more extraordinary: the recent startling demonstration, broadcast nationwide on ABC's "Good Morning America" last year, of a "physically impossible" major reduction -- in a few minutes! -- of long-lived radioactive Uranium isotopes. Normally, such processes require billions of years to accomplish. This too is now elegantly explained by the Hyperdimensional Model-- As -- an "induced hyperspatial stress," created by the machine ... the same stress that initially (in the Model) induces "unstable isotopes" in the first place. By technologically enhancing such vacuum stress within these nuclei, via a retuning of Maxwell's "scalar potentials," the normal radioactive breakdown process is accelerated -- literally billions of times ...




The implications for an entire "rapid, radioactive nuclear waste reduction technology" -- accomplishing in hours what would normally require aeons -- is merely one immediate, desperately needed world-wide application of such "Hyperdimensional Technologies."]



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In our own planetary system, all the "giant" planets possess a retinue of at least a dozen satellites: one or two major ones (approximating the size of the planet Mercury) ... with several others ranging down below the diameter and mass of our own Moon ... in addition to a host of smaller objects; because of the "lever effect" in the angular momentum calculations, even a small satellite orbiting far away (or at a steep angle to the planet's plane of rotation) can exert a disproportional effect on the "total angular momentum" equation -- just look at Pluto and the Sun.

Even now, Jupiter's four major satellites (which have collective masses approximately 1/10,000th of Jupiter itself), during the course of their complex orbital interactions, are historically known to cause time-altered behavior in a variety of well-known Jovian phenomena--

Including -- "anomalous" latitude and longitude motions of the Great Red Spot itself.

As we presented at the U.N. in 1992, the Great Red Spot -- a mysterious vortex located for over 300 years at that "infamous" 19.5 degrees S. Latitude, via the circumscribed tetrahedral geometry of the equally infamous "27 line problem" -- is the classic "hyperdimensional signature" of HD physics operating within Jupiter.

The existence of decades of recorded "anomalous motions" of this Spot, neatly synchronized with the highly predictable motions of Jupiter's own moons, are clearly NOT the result of conventional "gravitational" or "tidal" interactions -- in view of the relatively insignificant masses of the moons compared to Jupiter itself; but, following Maxwell and Whittaker, the hyperdimensional effects of these same moons -- via the long "lever" of angular momentum on the constantly changing, vorticular scalar stress potentials inside Jupiter -- that is a very different story ...

So, Hyperdimensional Test number three:


3) Look for small, short-term amplitude-variations in the infrared emission levels of all the giant planets ... synchronized (as are the still-mysterious motions of the GRS on Jupiter) with the orbital motions and conjunctions of their moons.
All NASA models for the "anomalous energy emissions" of these planets have assumed a steady output; the "snapshot" values derived from the mere few hours of Voyager fly-bys in the 1980's are now firmly listed in astronomy texts as new "planetary constants"; the reason: the emissions are viewed by NASA as either "primordial heat," stored across the aeons; energy release from internal long-term radioactive processes; or literal, slight settling of portions of the entire planet, still releasing gravitational potential energy ... all processes that will not change perceptibly even in thousands of years!

Confirmed short-term variations in the current planetary IR outputs, of "a few hours" (or even a few days) duration -- and synchronized with the orbital periods of the planets' satellites themselves -- would thus be stunning evidence that all the "mainstream" explanations are in trouble ... and that the Hyperdimensional Model deserves much closer scrutiny ...

In this same vein: unlike all "conventional NASA explanations," in a phenomenon akin to "hyperdimensional astrology," the HD model also specifically predicts significantly larger, long-term variability in these major planetary IR outputs ... of several years duration. These (like the shorter variations triggered by the changing geometry between the satellites) should be caused by the constantly changing hyperdimensional (spatial stress) interactions between the major planets themselves ... as they continually change their geometry relative to one another, each orbiting the Sun with a different relative velocity.




These changing interactive stresses in the "boundary between hyperspace and real' space" (in the Hyperdimensional Model) now also seem to be the answer to the mysterious "storms" that, from time to time, have suddenly appeared in the atmospheres of several of the outer planets. The virtual "disappearance," in the late 80's, of Jupiter's Great Red Spot is one remarkable example; Saturn's abrupt production of a major planetary "event," photographed by the Hubble Space Telescope in 1994 as a brilliant cloud erupting at 19.5 degrees N. (where else?!), is yet another.

Since the prevailing NASA view is that these planets' "excess" IR output must be constant over time, no one has bothered to look for any further correlations -- between a rising or falling internal energy emission ... and the (now, historically well-documented) semi-periodic eruptions of such "storms."

They should.

Part III

http://enterprisemission.com/hyper3.html

"But, if the known changes in solar output are due to hyperdimensional effects of the largest known planets, what of the magnitude of "aether stress" produced by our proposed "new planets" -- with angular momentum contributions hundreds of times greater?; the long-term cyclic increase in solar energy created by those cyclic phasings (yet-to-be-experienced in recorded history ...) could measure as much as several percent above current solar output. This is more than enough additional energy -- even without Mankind's current addition of significant "greenhouse gasses" to the atmosphere -- to trigger profound, millennia-long climatic changes here on Earth--

Including ... melting ice caps; rising ocean levels; dramatic changes in jet stream altitudes and activity; increased tornado intensities; increased hurricane wind velocities ... and-- "

..............................................................................................




Hubble's New "Runaway Planet":
A Unique Opportunity for Testing
the Exploding Planet Hypothesis and
... Hyperdimensional Physics
Part III
Which returns us to the Sun.

There is a very well-known, long-period, and still mysterious variability associated with the largest "hyperdimensional gate" in our own neighborhood -- our "local" star, the Sun.

Its complex changes, which include a host of related surface phenomena -- solar flares, coronal disturbances, mass ejections, etc. -- is termed "the sunspot cycle" ... because the number of simultaneous "spots" (lower-temperature vortices appearing "dark" against the hotter solar surface, as this activity occurs -- left) waxes and wanes over about 11 years. (The full magnetic reversal of the Sun's polarity takes two complete sunspot cycles to return to "zero" -- thus the complete "solar cycle" is about 20 years.)

In the 1940's, the Radio Corporation of America (RCA) hired a young electrical engineer -- John Nelson -- in an effort to improve the reliability of HF ("short-wave") radio communications around Earth. Such radio transmissions had been observed to be, for some reason, more reliable in the "lulls" in between, than during solar activity associated with "peak" sunspot years.

To his surprise, Nelson soon specifically correlated this rising and falling radio interference with not only sunspot cycle, but with the motions of the major planets of the solar system; he found, to his increasing astonishment, a very repeatable -- in essence, astrological correlation ... between the inexorable orbits of all the planets (but especially, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune -- which, remember, hold essentially all the solar's system's known angular momentum) ... and major radio-disturbing eruptions on the Sun!



The Hyperdimensional Model finally provides a comprehensive theoretical explanation -- a "linking mechanism" -- for these, to a lot of astronomers, still embarrassing decades-old RCA observations. For, in essence what John Nelson had rediscovered was nothing short of a "Hyperdimensional Astrology" -- the ultimate, very ancient, now highly demonstrable angular momentum foundations behind the real influences of the Sun and planets on our lives ...




For, as part of his solar research, Nelson also "rediscovered" something else ...


"It is worthy of note that in 1948 when Jupiter and Saturn were spaced by 120 degrees, and solar activity was at a maximum, radio signals averaged of far higher quality for the year than in 1951 with Jupiter and Saturn at 180 degrees and a considerable decline in solar activity. In other words, the average quality curve of radio signals followed the cycle curve between Jupiter and Saturn rather than the sunspot curve ... [emphasis added]."
-- J.H. Nelson, "Planetary Position Effect on
Short-Wave Signal Quality"
(Electrical Engineering, May 1952)

These decades-old observations are very telling ... not only confirming Jupiter and Saturn as the primary "drivers" behind the Sun's known cycle of activity (in the HD Model), but strongly implying an additional direct effect of their changing angular relationship on the electrical properties of Earth's ionosphere. This, of course, is totally consistent with these changing planetary geometries affecting not just the Sun, but the other planets as well ... just as "conventional" astrologers have claimed -- via Maxwell's "changing scalar potentials"...

Therefore, at this point, only the hyperdimensional theory--


1) Points to the (literally!) deepest implications of the simple astronomical fact that the "tail wags the dog"-- that the planets in this physics are fully capable of exerting a determinant influence on the Sun -- and each other -- through their disproportionate ratio of total solar system angular momentum ... over 100 to 1, in the [known!] planets' favor.
Only the Hyperdimensional Model--


2) Possesses the precise physical mechanism -- via Maxwell's "changing quaternion scalar potentials" -- accounting for this "anomalous" planetary angular momentum influence.
And, only the HD theory--


3) Has already publicly identified, at the United Nations, in 1992, a blatant geometric clue to this entire HD solar process: the maximum sunspot numbers (those large, relatively "cool," rotating vortices appearing on the solar surface), rising and falling and methodically changing latitude, during the course of the familiar 22-year solar cycle--
And peaking every half-cycle (~11 years), at the hyperdimensionally-significant solar latitude of ~ "19.5 degrees!"

Furthermore, recent discoveries via the indirect technique of "helioseismology" (optical monitoring of sound waves vibrating back and forth within the Sun), have revealed another clear solar "hyper-dimensional signature at play; a curious "jet," flowing around the north pole several thousand miles below the visible solar surface; the remarkable similarity to an equivalent phenomenon discovered by Voyager flowing around the north pole of Saturn -- a "polar hexagon" in the clouds -- even to the latitude, seems just a bit "too coincidental."

Unfortunately, because the discovery is not based on direct imaging (as with Voyager), but on an indirect "sub-surface flow" technique, the investigators have rounded off the corners of the potential sub-surface "solar hexagon"; in fact, they should consult more frequently with their NASA planetary colleagues for additional examples of this geometric, now clearly hyperdimensional "flow pattern" elsewhere in the solar system ...

The increasing identification of the hyperdimensional mechanism underlying the Sun's primary energy production has, unfortunately, brought with it certain inevitable, potentially disquieting predictions ...



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Described first by Kepler as his "Third Law," the farther out a planet orbits from its star the longer is its period of revolution. Since we're talking about possible additional planets driving this entire Hyperdimensional Solar Process (see again angular momentum diagram, above) -- planets that must be hundreds of times farther from the Sun than Earth (Pluto is "only" 40 times its distance, and orbits in "only" about 250 years) -- the "years" of these extremely distant worlds could equal thousands if not tens of thousands of Earth's year ... depending on their orbits. Because of these immense orbital periods, the cycles of solar energy production driven by their combined angular momentum will also be v-e-r-y long, indeed--

Perhaps as long as ~26,000 years ... (remember that number).

Also remember that such distant planets -- even if not particularly massive -- will have a disproportionately large effect on the total solar HD energy generation, because of the enormous "leverage" in the angular momentum equation with increasing distance. Thus, these still undiscovered worlds must in fact account for most of the solar energy we see ... depending on the actual orbital periods; the repeated ultra-long-term phasings of their orbits -- creating equally long-term angular momentum resonances in the Sun -- must produce resulting long-term cyclic changes in the Sun's total luminosity ... lasting literally thousands of years ... far longer than the short-term, historical "sunspot cycle" Nelson first linked directly to the known members of the solar system.

There is already a well-known link, between the historical 11-year "sunspot cycle" -- increased solar flares, x-ray emission, frequency of "coronal mass ejections," etc. -- and a measurable (if inexplicable as yet) increase in total solar energy production. Misnamed "the solar constant," this cyclic increase and decrease (according to satellite measurements) is curiously in phase with the current sunspot cycle ... averaging about 0.15%.

This NASA-documented short-term variation of the entire Sun, is now directly traceable (in the HD Model) to the changing geometric phase relationships between the solar system's two largest known planets, Jupiter and Saturn (as Nelson long ago confirmed); their orbital conjunctions -- when both worlds return again to the same geometric position, relative to one another -- take place on average roughly every 20 years ... the mean of the full "magnetic" solar cycle! (At the "half cycle" -- the familiar 11-year sunspot period itself -- Jupiter and Saturn are, of course, 180 degrees out of phase ... a critical clue to the determinate, modulating hyperspatial geometry actually inherent in this process ...)

But, if the known changes in solar output are due to hyperdimensional effects of the largest known planets, what of the magnitude of "aether stress" produced by our proposed "new planets" -- with angular momentum contributions hundreds of times greater?; the long-term cyclic increase in solar energy created by those cyclic phasings (yet-to-be-experienced in recorded history ...) could measure as much as several percent above current solar output. This is more than enough additional energy -- even without Mankind's current addition of significant "greenhouse gasses" to the atmosphere -- to trigger profound, millennia-long climatic changes here on Earth--

Including ... melting ice caps; rising ocean levels; dramatic changes in jet stream altitudes and activity; increased tornado intensities; increased hurricane wind velocities ... and--

A permanent "El Nino" (whose warmest waters, satellites report, are at ... ~19.5 degrees).

And that's saying nothing about HD energy added to the internal workings of our planet ...

From all indications, we are now well into just such a new, long-term, cyclic solar period ... just as the HD Model has predicted. The implications should be obvious.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Enter once more, Susan Terebey.

With the discovery and official NASA announcement of Dr. Terebey's "new planet" -- a "Jovian-type" world 450 light years away ... yet, in apparent total isolation -- we have the perfect conditions for a new series of crucial tests of the "Hyperdimensional Model," starting with--





1) Systematic spectroscopic observations (carried out over days or months), to detect the presence of any satellites of this proposed Jovian-type world. Curiously, this possibility has not even been alluded to in any of the official NASA presentations on this object (see NASA artist's depiction).
It is almost inconceivable that such a giant world could have formed without multiple orbiting satellites; just look at the "miniature solar systems" of moons orbiting the major planets of this solar system ...

Confirmation of such additional objects would in itself be another major scientific "first." But, in this case, it would also have far deeper implications; some of those same moons could have considerable mass themselves -- perhaps as much as Mars ... or even Earth ... depending on the parent planet's mass. The latter could, in fact, be independently determined (via appropriate application of "Kepler's Laws") through physical detection of such moons and determining their orbital periods. This would then provide a completely independent calibration of the accuracy of the "primary object's" currently estimated mass -- derived, as Terebey's freely admits, solely from theoretical "cooling curves" (see above) and the "new planet's" measured IR luminosity itself.

These additional remarkable objects (if they exist ...) should be detectable with a variety of present astronomical technologies -- including Hubble -- provided someone looks.


[And, confirmation of truly massive satellites (a "Mars" or "Earth") circling this new "potential planet" could vindicate, in a stroke, a major piece of Van Flandern's own revolutionary model -- that our own Mars (if not a number of other objects) once orbited a larger planet in this solar system as satellites ... until all (including Mars) were released by the catastrophic explosion of that "parent world."

Van Flandern, one of the world's leading celestial mechanics experts, has calculated the probable orbital parameters of such an extraordinary event -- and has reached the conclusion that Mars' uniquely elliptical path around the Sun (of all the inner planets) is highly consistent with its "escape" from such a "missing," former member of the solar system ...]




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Successful detection of a "Mars" or "Earth" (or any significant satellites) orbiting Susan Terebey's "new planet" would immediate present possibilities for carrying out the same variety of HD tests proposed (above) for the outer planets of this solar system, starting with--


2) Detection of distinct variations in the "new planet's" own infrared emissions -- synchronized with the calculated orbital periods of any detected satellites (or resonances thereof ...). This would offer immediate, compelling evidence for the general correctness of the "Hyperdimensional Model" ... especially, if such IR signatures could be matched with similar types of time-varying emissions observed radiating from the giant planets of this solar system ...
Such confirmations would provide crucial and timely evidence supporting the basic correctness of the "HD Model." Equally important, if such confirmations are forthcoming, the extraordinary possibility will be further enhanced that this same fundamental physics, in our own solar system, could ... and has--

Destroyed entire worlds ...



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For those who need a "practical" reason to address these issues, consider this:

Understanding the conditions under which these types of "epochal events" could come to pass ... and if, through proper understanding and control of "HD Physics," they can be averted for our planet ... would seem a simple, basic rationale for renewed interest in what Maxwell really stated. Given the demonstrable, historically-unprecedented changes currently occurring in our own environment -- from mysteriously-rising geophysical and volcanic activity (some of the most significant now occurring at that suspicious "19.5 degrees!"), to increasingly anomalous climatological and meteorological activity (does anyone notice that hurricanes have always been born at an average latitude of ...19.5 degrees?) -- verifying the effects of a changing "hyperdimensional physics" in our own neighborhood is far from being "merely academic."

Then, of course, there are the continuing, dramatic changes in the Sun...

Immediate solar predictions of the HD Model are simple and quite clear: increasingly violent average solar surface activity -- modulated with the rising and falling with the familiar "sunspot cycle" of ~11 years (cycle #23 should be a "lulu!") -- taking place against a backdrop of equally dramatic, long-term rising of total solar energy emission.

The major unknown is the overall effect of this slowly increasing "HD energy" availability throughout the entire solar system; for, remember, the changing "aether stress" is not localized inside stars or planets; these concentrations of "matter" merely allow us to trace the visible effects -- like red dye in clear water -- of these underlying, changing "hyperspatial strains." Thus, the overall dynamical effect of the Earth's own significant (to us!) angular momentum interaction with this changing solar system physics -- including its own long-term, "higher order rotation," the ~26,000 year precessional cycle and the mysterious role of the Moon -- is all still quite uncertain ...

However, recent anomalous observations of perhaps the most fundamental dynamical parameter of Earth -- its own rotation -- seem to support this growing perception that "something" indeed is rapidly changing in the solar system ...

For some inexplicable reason, there has been an accelerating slow-down of the Earth's spin on its own axis over the last twenty years -- as measured against electronic transitions of the "Cesium Atomic Clock," maintained at the National Bureau of Standards, in Boulder, Colorado.




Theoretically stable to "plus or minus one second in a million years ..." the official atomic clocks have literally had to be adjusted by over 20 seconds in these preceding two decades -- a stunning change by astronomical standards, and striking confirmation of some kind of major, "progressive phase-shift" now occurring, between the rotation of our planet and the atomic-level "constants" that govern the quantum standards of the Clock. This need to, with increasing frequency (now, approximately every six months) update a full second differential between "dynamical time" and "time at the atomic level," is profound confirmation of some kind of fundamental coupling between the angular momentum of our own planet, and the larger changes occurring in the hyperspatial physics of the solar system ... as outlined in the basic HD Model. This includes the possibility that these changing "hyperspatial stresses," due to the progressive orbital movement of our as-yet-undiscovered "outer planets" (in the Model) are simply causing increasing "Maxwellian scalar potential changes" all across the solar system at the atomic level -- changing (via the "Aharonov-Bohm Effect") all resultant quantum-level "constants" governing the clocks by small (but laboratory-measurable) amounts.


If this is true, it could thus be the Clocks themselves that are also internally changing ... simultaneous with the predicted, accelerating slow-down in the basic rotation of the Earth!
Additional evidence that "something major" is occurring in the solar system, is the recent announcement (by three major "world-class" laboratories) of startling changes in another fundamental physical parameter -- the Gravitational Constant; according to an article published in "Science News" in 1995, not only has this centuries-old "constant" been found to differ now from all previous "textbook" values ... each of the three laboratories reported different changes ... the largest amounting to a whopping (by measurement standards) 0.06%!




Completely inexplicable by any mainstream theories, such changes are intrinsically expected (ala Whittaker's derivation of "electrogravitic" linkages between gravity and light) in the true Maxwellian analysis of "varying scalar potentials" of the vacuum. Again: changes modulated by the changing phase relationships between our proposed "undiscovered outer planets" in the "total solar system angular momentum equation."

There is insufficient room to develop here (let alone to document) all the additional implications stemming from this Model (that will be done elsewhere). Suffice it to say, this is intrinsically a changing physics, affecting every known system of astronomical, physical, chemical and biological interaction differently over time -- because it affects the underlying, dynamical hyperspace foundation of "physical reality" itself ... starting with this solar system; that is implicit in the Model.

And now, according to all accumulating evidence and this centuries-old physics ... we are simply entering once again (after "only" 13,000 years ...) a phase of this recurring, grand solar system cycle "of renewed hyperdimensional restructuring of that reality ..."



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It is for these basic reasons that NASA must now openly -- and rapidly -- carry out these recommended new observations of the solar system, including additional, detailed measurements of "TMR-1C" ... and then immediately tell us the results.

Time is getting short.

From what I remember the Suns poles swapped and got 'stuck' half way. This could be the cause of the flares and could be effecting the entire solar system (including Jupiters new black spot).

The sun could eventually flame Earth, start another ice age, make the poles shift, blow all the volcanos, start massive ammounts of EQs...then again they could just go away. If it does start to do any of the above, I would immediately shut down ALL nuclear reactors because they would be effected by these changes for sure.

Hopi Indians and planet movements

http://www.wovoca.com/issue_20.htm

"Now we enter the time of testing which only the Great Creator can confirm. The alignment of the planets, we were so kindly informed of by the star watchers. The Hopi have expected this to happen and have been waiting. According to ceremonial tradition following the stars one day certain stars will come together in a row as has happened thousands of years ago. It is a time of purifying the land. Changing climate and many catastrophes may occur as we pass through this stage. What may happen no one really knows.

Although the alignment of the planets does have an exact time, according to legend it may be in your lifetime, your children's or their children's. But as the time times near the predicted behavior of the people accurately describes the people of today. Perhaps it is the time to repent and pray that our earth will not be totally lost. It has been said that this event may bring about one of two things: destruction or the prosperity to renew the earth to its original wholesomeness. This much we do know. "

jeesh, i wish i could get my mind wrapped around this scalar stuff, but it won't even climb the mole-hill of calculus. i'm stuck in the valleys of trig and geometry. but i do appreciate at least having a clue about Maxwell's breakthrough and the subsequent coverup.
i don't recall reading about the sun's poles getting stuck half way tho. that's pretty disconcerting if true.
re: the Hopi's prophetic " It has been said that this event may bring about one of two things: destruction or the prosperity to renew the earth to its original wholesomeness. "
i vote for the "original wholesomeness". but i have a feeling based on the degenerating attitudes and behaviors of people that i observe around me that i'm gonna be disappointed after all the votes are counted...

Here is another one

This one is a couple of days old. Put the Hyperdimentional physics triangles inside this solar body and see if the energy doesn't seem to originate around 19.5.

Thanks to heather

for posting this on another thread.

There have been a number of 5.5 and higher EQ's in the last week or so, in itself not that unusual. Now word out of Alaska, if correct in it's assessment, showing something possibly unusual. I post this with a caveat, because Battros HAS jumped the gun on a few occasions and blew things out of proportion.

However, if accurate this sudden burst of energy DOES tie in with both the hyperdimentional model and Mccanney's plasma discharge model in as much as the earth is absorbing huge amounts of energy, and it has to go somewhere.

ds

(edited) after another perusal of the 'alert' below, the time stamp appears to be the same or within minutes. therefore the possibilty exists that this is all one quake, read from different stations. if so, Battros is an idiot for wanting to be the first one to post info, so badly, that he is guilty of the same bad science he accuses Art Bell of. now, I may, from time to time, be guilty of said actions myself. but I don't have a paid subscriber list, I just post to Timebomb!
..................................................

Amchitka Island Explodes With Several 'Mega Quakes'...11/17/03
by Mitch Battros (ECTV)
Folks, I can tell you I have never seen anything like this before. What you see below is no less than nine (9) 7.7 to 7.9 'mega quakes'. This is so unusual, I wonder of nuclear testing has taken place. If it was not nuclear testing, could it have something to do with HAARP? And if not HAARP, what may have caused this enourmous string of mega quakes? Is there a 'cause & effect' scenerio to the Sun? Will there be more? Is this somehow related to Earth's magnetic pole shift? Then again, maybe it is nothing at all. Oh I'm sure the Earth has seen this many times before, but no one living today has.

To many questions, not enough answers. Look for an upcoming news release with more information on todays events. DEVELOPING....


The History of Amchitka

Located in the Rat Islands of the Aleutian Chain, Amchitka Island is 35 miles long and almost 3 miles wide. It lies at
approximately 51° 32' N Latitude, 179° 00' E Longitude . The community is located in the Aleutian Islands Recording
District. The area encompasses 116 sq. miles of land and 161 sq. miles of water.

Amchitka is an Aleut name first reported by early Russians as Ostrov Amchitka. During the World War II Aleutians
campaign, military operations were present on several islands in the Chain. In the early 1960s, Amchitka became a nuclear
testing facility under the Atomic Energy Commission. Three underground nuclear explosions occurred in the 1960s and
1970s. The facility was closed in 1994.


Todays Earthquake List

Date / Time Magnitude Comments
2003/11/17 06:43:45.1 44.4N 142.8E mb 4.9 A BUC HOKKAIDO, JAPAN, REGION
2003/11/17 06:43:44.0 69.9N 171.9E Mw 7.9 A LIC NEAR N.CST OF EASTERN SIBERIA
2003/11/17 06:43:40.8 58.0N 179.8W 10 mb 6.5 M SED BERING SEA
2003/11/17 06:43:38.0 57.2N 179.6E mb 6.0 A RNS BERING SEA
2003/11/17 06:43:33.3 49.1N 172.1E 33 mb 5.8 A NOR SOUTH OF ALEUTIAN ISLANDS
2003/11/17 06:43:32.1 56.0N 179.0W 33 mb 6.1 A LDG BERING SEA
2003/11/17 06:43:22.0 54.0N 178.5E Mw 7.9 A LOR BERING SEA
2003/11/17 06:43:16.0 52.4N 177.2W Mw 7.9 A EVRO ANDREANOF ISLANDS, ALEUTIAN IS.
2003/11/17 06:43:14.7 52.1N 175.7E M 6.7 A INGV RAT ISLANDS, ALEUTIAN IS.
2003/11/17 06:43:11.2 51.4N 170.0W mb 5.3 M MAD FOX ISLANDS, ALEUTIAN ISLANDS.
2003/11/17 06:43:11.0 52.0N 179.0E mb 6.7 M LDGM RAT ISLANDS, ALEUTIAN IS.
2003/11/17 06:43:08.0 51.5N 178.6E 33 Ms 7.7 M GSRC RAT ISLANDS, ALEUTIAN IS.
2003/11/17 06:43:08.0 51.5N 178.6E 33 Ms 7.7 A GSSA RAT ISLANDS, ALEUTIAN IS.
2003/11/17 06:43:08.0 50.8N 179.8E 30 mb 6.8 A. ODC RAT ISLANDS, ALEUTIAN IS.
2003/11/17 06:43:07.3 51.4N 178.6E 33 M 7.3 M! NEIR RAT ISLANDS, ALEUTIAN IS.
2003/11/17 06:43:06.8 51.3N 178.6E 33 M 7.8 M NEIR RAT ISLANDS, ALEUTIAN IS.
2003/11/17 06:43:06.0 50.0N 180.0E mb 6.4 A LED RAT ISLANDS, ALEUTIAN IS.
2003/11/17 06:43:04.2 51.3N 178.8E 10 Mw 7.9 M+ CSEM RAT ISLANDS, ALEUTIAN IS.
2003/11/17 06:42:59.0 50.1N 175.7E Mw 7.9 A FLN RAT ISLANDS, ALEUTIAN IS.
2003/11/17 06:42:59.0 49.8N 178.0E mb 6.7 A GFZ SOUTH OF ALEUTIAN ISLANDS
2003/11/17 06:42:51.8 46.6N 164.7E 10 mb 6.2 A SED SOUTH OF ALEUTIAN ISLANDS

yep, that's the same quake from different seismo's, it's an easy mistake for a beginner to make.

This is so unusual, I wonder of nuclear testing has taken place.

Click to expand...

now why mention this? this was mentioned (jokingly) here yesterday.....think he's lurking here somewhere?

I've debated

putting this additional info from R.C. Hoagland here because it is long, arcane, hard to fathom, and is conspiratorial. However, I am just adding the link to it for those who like long convoluted arguements.

It DOES tie in very much with 19.5 and hyperdimentional physics, and possible suppression of same.

In a nutshell, here it is:

From many years reading of pole shifts, secret sciences, occult and other 'secret' groups such as the Masons, the story goes like this; there are periodic destructions of the earth. usually, a remnant survives that passes the 'secret' on (anyone who studies ancient history such as the Roman and Greek understands that being a part of the "mystery" schools back then was a BIG thing).

The secret is that there are 'signs' that occur in more or less a regular pattern, when the earth transverses the 26,000 year processional path through the galaxies.

The secret groups 'know' when the destructions are to occur, and lest mankind be totally wiped out, or totally be put back to the stone age, the secret group has a sacred duty to prepare for the destruction when it is at hand again.

I will post some more info on this later. But for those who want to read Hoagland's take on this here is the link:

http://enterprisemission.com/millenn.htm

Now, for Hoagland followers, although he sounds quite kooky at times, there has been a great many 'coincidental' tie ins to Egyptian Sacred star configurations over Washington, the Nile, Cape Canaveral, etc,. and an uncanny connection between certain high Egyptian officials, Masons, and ALL of our Nasa history.

Sounds kooky, but if you follow the links (as hard as they are to understand) you DO find some very strange bedfellows. IE; Zawii Hawass, Egyptian Director of Antigueties, the BIG GUY in charge of everything in Egypt, controlling every access to Pyramids, sites, archological digs, etc. His BROTHER was Project Manager for the early NASA astronaut flights. In other words, his brother chose the very minute our astronauts would launch, set down on the moon, rise up, etc., and just by 'coincidence' these things would occur over and over and over again when the ancient Star Gods of the ancient Egyptians would be in the sky over specific sites.

Now, Hoagland has shown this over and over, successfully, so many times in the past, that any thinking person has to conclude that there is SOMETHING to it.

How does it tie in with 19.5 and the sun? I'll let Hoagland speak for himself - and when I do, remember what the sun is doing RIGHT NOW:

........................................................................................

The "Age of Horus" Dawns
Or
The Time is Now ...



... Because it's Later Than You Think


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The world has watched and waited as the unfolding electoral chaos in Florida has gripped us now for weeks. As might be expected, we at Enterprise have a "slightly different take" on what's currently occurring than most other political observers. In fact, if we are right -- based on almost three years of astonishing historical research initiated by Enterprise Principal Investigator Richard C. Hoagland -- what we are seeing currently on television is only the beginning of an unfolding story that will leave you shaken to the core ...
................................................................

Yet, despite this seemingly self-evident reality, Democrat Al Gore, the current Vice-President of the United States, has been perceived by many as willing to pursue any and all legal options to rescind this incredibly narrow margin of victory for Bush. ..................................................

So why, given this well-known political history, are both current candidates apparently so desperate to achieve the Presidency of the United States in this "Turn of the Millennium" election? Both are certainly still young enough to attempt another run for the White House in four years. Bush especially, with virtually half the Country expressing a desire to have him be the next President, is in an extraordinarily strong position to come back in 2004 and revisit the closest U.S. election in history. What could motivate them both to potentially throw it all away in a desperate power play right now -- at the probable expense of their place in history and their standing with the people who elected them (and who could elect them again!)?

The answer, strangely enough, lies not in present day America but in the vast ancient sands of post-diluvial Egypt and Sumer. What we are seeing here is not merely the use of "any and all means" to obtain the powers of the day, but rather a playing out of an ancient symbolic conflict that will inevitably consume all the rest of us ... whether we know of it or not!

What we are seeing play out in Florida, we believe, from our previous research into this entire issue of the historically-documented Masonic/Egyptian origins of the office of "President (First) of the United States," is nothing less than a battle among self-appointed "gods," Gore and Bush, over who gets to be "Horus" at the "end of days!"

And make no mistake, we are truly at The End of Days. We have waited nearly a year now to reveal what we have come to know (and yet still have an incredibly hard time believing ...). The "Millennium" (as popularly perceived on January 1) just past, was NOT an insignificant, arbitrary event. It was, in fact, a specific marker set up as a "final warning" of what is to come, of "the Eternity, before which we stand upon the Brink ..."

This political chaos currently playing out on global television is not merely a conflict between two competing social or economic philosophies. From our research, it is nothing less than a competition for "the soul of the human race," a war over who gets to be in control when the cataclysm strikes, who gets to ensure that their side ultimately survives ...

.................................................

This will not end quietly, as the 1960 controversy did. It cannot ... if we are right. Both sides will -- must! -- use any and all methods and options at their disposal to obtain this White House. It's easy to concede when you think you have a future; the problem here is that neither side believes, after the events of January 1, 2000, there's now much "future" left, and the political blood bath will continue until one side is ultimately vanquished.

If we are right, there will be no "dignified exit" this time, for one or the other contender "for the good of the country." Because, simply put, neither side can afford -- at this late hour -- to lose this literally "life and death fight" ...

...............................................................................

Hyperdimentional physics

There is a fellow that George Ure seems to follow, and he is saying that according to his studies Dec 24 to Jan 6 is the prime time for more solar flaring and CME's due to a hyperdimetional pull on the sun:

http://www.halfpasthuman.com/HPHUE_GEOUPDATE.htm

Universe Events - Solar events are scaling up



Here comes the sun, and further, there is now an alignment with two hyperspatial geometries.

12.17.2003



"SUNSPOTS: The Earth-facing side of the sun is nearly blank. Only a few small sunspots pepper the solar disk. But the farside of the sun is a different story. Holographic images reveal what may be a large sunspot group there. If it persists, the 'spot would appear on the sun's eastern limb on or about Dec. 22nd."


The above is taken from WWW.SPACEWEATHER.COM of December 17, 2003.

Our work with the angular momentum and hyperspatial geometry suggests that the period from December 24 th through December 26th will be the peak of 'angular pull' of the approach part of this cycle. Therefore, presuming that the developing sunspots do not flare on/before the 22nd (a possibility due to the angular pull as the group rotates around the sun) then the period of most likely flaring will extend from the 24th through the 26th when the group will be rotating more earth facing.

Further, the period from December 31 through January 5th will have the sunspot group rotating into the 'short' arm of the angular pull which is to say, away from earth facing. Should there be significant filaments at that time, then flaring and CME's could be expected. It should be noted that the short arm of the angular geometry has produced the most solar activity in the past. This is due to the increase in pull affecting the solar structures. This area will have the sunspots on the 'right-most' one third of the sun and rotating away from earth facing. NOTE: Even as sunspots rotate away from earth, they are still potentially dangerous.


Bona fortuna in nova annum.