Bayer Admits GMO Contamination is Out of Control

gdpetti

Inactive
Greenpeace International, Dec 8, 2009
Straight to the Source

EXTRACT: Bayer has admitted it has been unable to control the spread of its genetically-engineered organisms despite 'the best practices [to stop contamination]'(1). It shows that all outdoors field trials or commercial growing of GE crops must be stopped before our crops are irreversibly contaminated.
---
---
$2 million US dollar verdict against Bayer confirms company's liability for an uncontrollable technology

Greenpeace welcomes the United States federal jury ruling on 4 December 2009 that Bayer CropScience LP must pay $2 million US dollars to two Missouri farmers after their rice crop was contaminated with an experimental variety of rice that the company was testing in 2006.

This verdict confirms that the responsibility for the consequences of GE (genetic engineering) contamination rests with the company that releases GE crops.

Bayer has admitted it has been unable to control the spread of its genetically-engineered organisms despite 'the best practices [to stop contamination]'(1). It shows that all outdoors field trials or commercial growing of GE crops must be stopped before our crops are irreversibly contaminated.

A report prepared for Greenpeace International concluded that the total costs incurred throughout the world as a result of the contamination are estimated to range from $741 million to $1.285 billion US dollars.(2) The verdict indicates that Bayer is liable for what could turn out to be a large proportion of these costs, as it awards damages in the first two of more than 1,000 currently pending lawsuits. The decision must be used to support all claims for losses incurred by other US farmers whose crops have suffered from GE contamination.

(1) Bayers Defense lawyer, Mark Ferguson as reported in Harris, A. 2009.
Bayer Blamed at Trial for Crops 'Contaminated' by Modified Rice. Bloomberg News 4th November 2009, available at:
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aT...

(2) E.N. Blue (2007) Risky Business. Economic and regulatory impacts from the unintended release of genetically engineered rice varieties into the rice merchandising system of the US. Report prepared for Greenpeace International, available online at http://www.greenpeace.org/raw/content/international/press....

========================

fair use http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_19777.cfm
 

Flippper

Time Traveler
Wow. Not a single comment? The GMO spread has been responsible for the theft of many a farmer's ancestral lands.
 

gdpetti

Inactive
Yea, but not many read this forum... even I don't. We all have to make choices, and there just isn't enough time in the day.. nor interest in all things. We each have likes and dislikes, but it is important to have a basic understanding of WTF is really going on around us. Knowledge is power, use it or lose it.

Like this article... as the research starts coming in on all the GMO crap... research the companies selling it aren't willing to do themselves.. as long as the govt no longer requires them to do so. At least those companies are getting their monies worth... overseas they are called bribes, whereas here in the States, we refer to them as campaign contributions.
Monsanto's GMO Corn Linked To Organ Failure, Study Reveals

Katherine Goldstein/Gazelle Emami
Huffington Post
Tue, 12 Jan 2010 07:44 EST

In a study released by the International Journal of Biological Sciences, analyzing the effects of genetically modified foods on mammalian health, researchers found that agricultural giant Monsanto's GM corn is linked to organ damage in rats.

According to the study, which was summarized by Adam Shake at Twilight Earth, "Three varieties of Monsanto's GM corn - Mon 863, insecticide-producing Mon 810, and Roundup® herbicide-absorbing NK 603 - were approved for consumption by US, European and several other national food safety authorities."

Monsanto gathered its own crude statistical data after conducting a 90-day study, even though chronic problems can rarely be found after 90 days, and concluded that the corn was safe for consumption. The stamp of approval may have been premature, however.

In the conclusion of the IJBS study, researchers wrote:

"Effects were mostly concentrated in kidney and liver function, the two major diet detoxification organs, but in detail differed with each GM type. In addition, some effects on heart, adrenal, spleen and blood cells were also frequently noted. As there normally exists sex differences in liver and kidney metabolism, the highly statistically significant disturbances in the function of these organs, seen between male and female rats, cannot be dismissed as biologically insignificant as has been proposed by others. We therefore conclude that our data strongly suggests that these GM maize varieties induce a state of hepatorenal toxicity....These substances have never before been an integral part of the human or animal diet and therefore their health consequences for those who consume them, especially over long time periods are currently unknown."
Monsanto has immediately responded to the study, stating that the research is "based on faulty analytical methods and reasoning and do not call into question the safety findings for these products."

The IJBS study's author Gilles-Eric Séralini responded to the Monsanto statement on the blog, Food Freedom, "Our study contradicts Monsanto conclusions because Monsanto systematically neglects significant health effects in mammals that are different in males and females eating GMOs, or not proportional to the dose. This is a very serious mistake, dramatic for public health. This is the major conclusion revealed by our work, the only careful reanalysis of Monsanto crude statistical data."
http://www.sott.net/articles/show/200898-Monsanto-s-GMO-Corn-Linked-To-Organ-Failure-Study-Reveals

Then there's this.. ( I highly recommend sott.net since they redid their site a year? ago... they really cover everything well)... fair use http://www.sott.net/articles/show/200860-Where-Are-Pesticides-Made-Perhaps-Inside-Your-Belly
Flashback: Where Are Pesticides Made? Perhaps Inside Your Belly

Leah Zerbe
Rodale Institute
Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:19 EDT

Modified genes in our food supply may be modifying us, says Jeffrey M. Smith.

More than half the people in the U.S. say they don't want to eat genetically modified (GM) food, but many of them probably aren't sure why, or how to avoid it, Jeffrey M. Smith, author of Seeds of Deception and Genetic Roulette, explained Saturday to an audience of food retailers and manufacturers at Natural Products Expo West in Anaheim, CA.

The Details: There's a push in the U.S. to get genetically modified organisms (GMOs) out of our food supply. Other countries have already done this, and Smith, executive director of the Institute for Responsible Technology, hopes U.S. consumers will start paying closer attention to the issue. He estimates that if just 5 percent or so start rejecting GM food, it'll force a big change.

How do foods become genetically modified? In the traditional cross-breeding process, two varieties of, say, tomatoes might be crossed for a more robust fruit. But today's technology inserts out-of-species genes, often from bacteria and viruses, into the DNA of plants like corn, soybean, cotton, and canola, introducing genetic matter into our food that's never been there before. The process allows conventional growers to douse even larger amounts of poisonous herbicides onto the modified plants without killing the crop. That introduces more chemicals into the groundwater and waterways near the farm, but it also increases the amount of chemical residue on the foods. Some crops have even been modified so the plant produces its own pesticide.

Smith reports that GM foods are being blamed for allergies, new toxins, and immune problems. For instance, Smith says soy allergies rose by 50 percent in the United Kingdom after GM soy was introduced. In animal studies, feeding mice GM foods has caused digestion problems, smaller livers, reproductive problems, and infant mortality. Livestock that have grazed on GM cotton fields have died abruptly, too. And Smith points out that if pesticide genes transfer into the bacteria in our gut - as the only human study on the subject suggests they can - we're in for some serious changes in our bellies. "They might turn our intestinal bacteria into living pesticide factories," he says.

What it means: Since the U.S. Food and Drug Administration doesn't require safety testing of these foods (the FDA takes the word of the biotech companies on that), you'll have to do a little detective work if you want to lower your exposure to GMOs. Fortunately, there are alternatives.

Here's how to clear your cart of GM foods:

Know the big 4. Food makers are not required to indicate GMO content on their labels. Corn, soy, canola, and cotton are the most prominent GM crops; that doesn't mean all these crops are genetically altered, but many are. If you favor cane sugar over other types, you'll avoid GM sugar beets, Smith says. In much smaller numbers, zucchini, yellow crookneck squash, and sweet corn could be GM; about half of Hawaiian papayas are GM.


Look at the label. Some food companies are taking the voluntary step of labeling products that are GMO-free. And if you buy organic versions of any food, you'll avoid GMOs, since they aren't allowed in certified organic products.


Go for grass-fed. Look for meat and dairy producers that feed their animals grass, not GM grain. The GMO process might cause grain to produce toxins that are taken up by the cattle and passed on in milk and meat, Smith warns.


Sidestep processed foods. When you buy processed foods, there are ingredients from all over added to the mix. And it won't say on the label if that includes any GMOs. Ingredients that could be genetically modified include aspartame, corn gluten, corn oil, corn syrup, cornmeal, cornstarch, high-fructose corn syrup, fructose, glucose, soy flour, soy lecithin, soy protein, tofu, xanthan gum, monosodium glutamate (MSG), caramel color. (You can find more in The Non-GMO Shopping Guide, listed below.)


Get the guide. The Non-GMO Shopping Guide is as essential as a shopping list for anyone who wants to avoid GMO food. It lists brands that refuse to use GM ingredients, and also lists companies that may be using them. For instance, Nature's Path, Amy's Kitchen, and Eden products don't include GM ingredients, but Aunt Jemima, Betty Crocker, Morning Star, Boca, Kellogg, General Mills, Post, and Quaker products could, among many others.


Host a GMO-free potluck. This is a good way to get your family members and neighbors educated and engaged about the safety of our food supply. Direct them to the shopping guide and they'll find out it's not so hard to go GMO-free - you just have to know what to look for. Your dinner could inspire some to try the 30-day challenge at Campaign for Healthier Eating in America.
 
Last edited:

ShadowMan

Designated Grumpy Old Fart
Nature has it's natural checks and balances. Inserting cross species genetic DNA material via virus' and bacteria is just asking for trouble. If the Creator had intended jelly fish and lettuce to mate I'm sure he would have worked out some way for that to happen. There is no way that I would trust Monsanto or anyone else for that matter to play God and think they can get away with it with out some sort of SNAFU and payback!!

Like the old margarine commercial used to say...It's not nice to fool Mother Nature!:eek::sb:
 
Top