Check out the TB2K CHATROOM, open 24/7               Configuring Your Preferences for OPTIMAL Viewing
  To access our Email server, CLICK HERE

  If you are unfamiliar with the Guidelines for Posting on TB2K please read them.      ** LINKS PAGE **



*** Help Support TB2K ***
via mail, at TB2K Fund, P.O. Box 24, Coupland, TX, 78615
or


WTF?!? National Review: The Masters of the Universe Can't Censor You if You Censor Yourself
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Behind Enemy Lines
    Posts
    169,763

    15 National Review: The Masters of the Universe Can't Censor You if You Censor Yourself

    National Review: The Masters of the Universe Can't Censor You if You Censor Yourself | Breitbart
    Lucas Nolan
    5-7 minutes

    The National Review has a new plan for social media users to fight back against censorship — deleting your account.

    The National Review published an article recently titled “Close Your Social-Media Accounts,” in which the publication argues that in order to fight back against censorship, social media users should just ignore the problem entirely. The Review points out that social media sites such as Facebook and Twitter are optional, and as such any users worried about being censored should just remove themselves from the platform entirely.

    National Review writer Sam Sweeney writes in his article:
    For me the question isn’t whether the government should regulate social-media outlets, or whether they should be treated like utilities, or whether the outlets themselves should adopt a First Amendment principle voluntarily, or whether they should de-platform views outside the mainstream or outside their own woke visions of society. My question is instead: Does this debate mean, on a moral level, that we now treat our social-media platforms as extensions of ourselves? How else could restrictions on our social-media activity be construed as a violation of the First Amendment? As Jonah Goldberg points out, any publication already censors anyone it chooses not to publish. In no way does that restrict free speech. No one could plausibly say that being rejected by National Review was a violation of his free speech. Facebook censoring a post is a violation of free speech only if my profile is me and I am my profile.
    The writer then suggests that users should just delete their accounts, calling it the “21st-century equivalent of becoming a cloistered monk.”
    My advice: Delete your Facebook, yesterday. Don’t get your news from Twitter. The issues of free speech on social media will no longer matter to you. They don’t matter to me. I’ve made a decision not to subjugate myself to the whims of our new overlords. They can open their platform to everyone from neo-Nazis to Kim Jong-un, or they can have a litmus test that includes denouncing Donald Trump or the pope at regular intervals — a sort of school-bathroom pass fitting for our generation’s extended adolescence in which Mark Zuckerberg plays the schoolmarm. It won’t affect my life either way. In my own mind at least, I am free because these things no longer define my life. I am happier as a result. I can still read a book of some length, an ability I see dropping off sharply among my peers.

    Not having Facebook is the 21st-century equivalent of becoming a cloistered monk. If I can just stop opening Twitter, I will feel like I’ve replaced Saint Simeon on his pillar. Monastic jokes aside, let me tell you: Life doesn’t end when you close your social-media accounts. In fact, the day you close them is the day your life truly begins again.
    Breitbart News writer Allum Bokhari previously discussed the National Review’s funding from Google in an article titled “Sundar Pichai Confirms Google Gave Money to National Review Institute.”

    Bokhari writes:
    Pichai used his written answers to congressional questions to disclose his company’s donation to the National Review Institute, which was revealed by National Review senior editor Jonah Goldberg last year. The Google CEO confirmed the donation, stating that it was made in 2018 and would, therefore, be disclosed in the company’s next report.

    “Google has a long history of supporting organizations on all sides of the political spectrum,” said Pichai. “Google was one of several corporate sponsors of the National Review Institute’s William F. Buckley Prize Dinner in 2018, which is scheduled to be reported in our upcoming transparency report.”

    But the National Review Institute’s website states that it received a donation from Google a year earlier, in 2017. This donation was not disclosed in Google’s transparency report for that year.

    Google’s contributions to the National Review Institute were brought to light by a report in the left-leaning technology magazine Wired, which detailed a number of the tech giant’s contributions to establishment conservative institutions in order to fend off tech regulation from Republicans. Other organizations funded by Google include the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) and the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI).
    Bokhari notes that the National Review has actually published articles by a senior member of the Competitive Enterprise Institute arguing against Google antitrust measures:
    National Review subsequently published an article from a senior member of the CEI, arguing against the use of antitrust legislation to break up Google and other big tech companies. The article was published four months after the National Review Institute’s 2017 William F. Buckley Prize Dinner, which as the Institute’s own website discloses, was sponsored by Google among other companies.

    National Review senior editor Jonah Goldberg admitted to the Google funding in an article following a Twitter exchange with One America News correspondent Emerald Robinson last year, in which she criticized the links between Goldberg’s magazine and big tech.
    Read Bokhari’s full article here.

    Lucas Nolan is a reporter for Breitbart News covering issues of free speech and online censorship. Follow him on Twitter @LucasNolan or email him at lnolan@breitbart.com

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    16,122
    Which is pure-T idiocy because even someone with minimal understanding of search engines knows that inbound links are a big measure of search engine success. And you can hardly get any kind of audience without a search engine any more, so you pretty much have to.

    Which is also why these things are well on their way to becoming public utilities, and I would pay for a Pay-Per-View to see the looks on the various CEOs' faces when they find out they are.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Behind Enemy Lines
    Posts
    169,763
    The "Masters of the Universe" are going to squeal like pigs when they're finally reined-in.


    Good...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    16,122
    Quote Originally Posted by Dennis Olson View Post
    The "Masters of the Universe" are going to squeal like pigs when they're finally reined-in.


    Good...
    I only hope they ARE reined in.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Behind Enemy Lines
    Posts
    169,763
    Speaking strictly for myself, I'd love to read that all those CEOs were dragged out and shot...

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    2,549
    ah, the answer to censorship is to shut up...what geniuses

    is this advice from the dying print media?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Behind Enemy Lines
    Posts
    169,763
    Deutschland uber alles....

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    16,581
    Quote Originally Posted by Dennis Olson View Post
    Speaking strictly for myself, I'd love to read that all those CEOs were dragged out and shot...
    Glad Im not the CEO here!
    "Man is not to be blamed for sinning. After all, he faces great temptations and is extremely vulnerable. What he is blamed for is not doing Teshuvah (repenting) because he can do that at any time." Rav Simcha Bunim of P'shischa

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Behind Enemy Lines
    Posts
    169,763
    I'm not a billionaire, nor do I censor hundreds of millions of users.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


NOTICE: Timebomb2000 is an Internet forum for discussion of world events and personal disaster preparation. Membership is by request only. The opinions posted do not necessarily represent those of TB2K Incorporated (the owner of this website), the staff or site host. Responsibility for the content of all posts rests solely with the Member making them. Neither TB2K Inc, the Staff nor the site host shall be liable for any content.

All original member content posted on this forum becomes the property of TB2K Inc. for archival and display purposes on the Timebomb2000 website venue. Said content may be removed or edited at staff discretion. The original authors retain all rights to their material outside of the Timebomb2000.com website venue. Publication of any original material from Timebomb2000.com on other websites or venues without permission from TB2K Inc. or the original author is expressly forbidden.



"Timebomb2000", "TB2K" and "Watching the World Tick Away" are Service Mark℠ TB2K, Inc. All Rights Reserved.