Check out the TB2K CHATROOM, open 24/7               Configuring Your Preferences for OPTIMAL Viewing
  To access our Email server, CLICK HERE

  If you are unfamiliar with the Guidelines for Posting on TB2K please read them.      ** LINKS PAGE **



*** Help Support TB2K ***
via mail, at TB2K Fund, P.O. Box 24, Coupland, TX, 78615
or


POL Federal Court: State Cannot Bind Presidential Electors
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1

    4 Federal Court: State Cannot Bind Presidential Electors

    https://freebeacon.com/politics/fede...tial-electors/
    (fair use applies)


    Federal Court: State Cannot Bind Presidential Electors
    Ruling could impact liberal efforts at Electoral College workaround

    Todd Shepherd - August 21, 2019 3:45 PM

    A panel of federal judges with the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of appeals handed down a 2-1 ruling saying the state of Colorado was wrong in 2016 to force a presidential elector to cast his vote for Hillary Clinton in the Electoral College.

    State law in Colorado mandates that presidential electors cast their Electoral College vote for the candidate receiving the most votes statewide, which in that instance was Hillary Clinton.

    In 2016, however, elector Micheal Baca tried to cast his vote for Ohio's then-governor, Republican John Kasich, as part of a short-lived movement to circumvent Trump's election in a kind of compromise. Supporters of the idea hoped enough electors would defect to Kasich to deny Trump the presidency — arguing Trump was too unstable or dangerous — but would still have given Republicans control of the executive branch rather than handing that power to Democrats.

    When Baca cast his vote for Kasich, then-secreatary of state Wayne Williams (R.) removed and replaced Baca with an elector who voted for Clinton.

    "Secretary Williams impermissibly interfered with Mr. Baca's exercise of his right to vote as a presidential elector," part of the court ruling read. "Specifically, Secretary Williams acted unconstitutionally by removing Mr. Baca and nullifying his vote for failing to comply with the vote binding provision."

    "Article II and the Twelfth Amendment provide presidential electors the right to cast a vote for President and Vice President with discretion," the majority ruling added.


    The decision effectively gives legal permission in any state to so-called "faithless electors," those who vote for someone other than the leading vote getter in the state or otherwise does not vote in coordination with the statewide election results.

    Heightening the importance of the ruling is the fact that just this spring Colorado passed a law entering the state into the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, or NPV, which attempts to create a workaround to how the Electoral College has operated for two centuries, but would not require a Constitutional amendment.

    In nearly all circumstances historical or present, electors cast their Electoral College vote for the candidate who receives the most votes in that state in a winner-take-all allocation.

    The National Popular Vote, however, is an agreement of the states that have adopted the compact to cast their Electoral College votes for the candidate who receives the most votes nationwide, even if citizens of that state voted for a different candidate.

    The NPV does not have any legal effect until enough states have joined that their electoral votes surpass 270, the amount needed to elect the president. Fifteen states and the District of Columbia have joined the compact for a total of 196 Electoral College votes.

    Colorado secretary of state Jena Griswold told the Colorado Sun the ruling could hamstring the NPV, noting that the mandates of how the electors should vote under the NPV could be ignored.

    In the months since the Colorado General Assembly passed NPV legislation that Governor Jared Polis (D.) then signed into law, a citizens' group submitted more than 227,000 signatures in an effort to force a referendum vote on the NPV in November of next year.

    Those signatures are still undergoing a certification process with the secretary of state's office. If roughly 125,000 signatures pass muster, the question will be placed on the ballot, creating the first real citizen-led test of the NPV.

    Until now, state legislative bodies have passed all NPV legislation without any challenge from citizens in their respective states.
    The future keeps telling us what the past was about. You make the past mean different things by the way you use the time that come after.- A. Fancy

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    West Virginia
    Posts
    37,724
    So the government of every state should receive a copy of the ruling so they can't say they did not know. The courts also need to chime in on the states trying to eliminate the electoral college as its a binding constitutional mandate.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    SE Georgia
    Posts
    4,343
    This used to be taught in US history. I guess they don't anymore these days.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    West Virginia
    Posts
    37,724
    Quote Originally Posted by 20Gauge View Post
    This used to be taught in US history. I guess they don't anymore these days.


    That would be correct they don't as the United States Constitution is taught as being racist and written by white privileged men and thats it, it stops there and carries on with the marxist agenda.
    Last edited by Publius; 08-22-2019 at 10:51 AM. Reason: fix

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Behind Enemy Lines
    Posts
    171,636
    The RoL is dying faster every day in this country.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    3,724
    I'm sure CO has the 125,000 votes.

    If THEY say no, they are lying.
    "Apres la Guerre."

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    West Virginia
    Posts
    37,724
    Bump:

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


NOTICE: Timebomb2000 is an Internet forum for discussion of world events and personal disaster preparation. Membership is by request only. The opinions posted do not necessarily represent those of TB2K Incorporated (the owner of this website), the staff or site host. Responsibility for the content of all posts rests solely with the Member making them. Neither TB2K Inc, the Staff nor the site host shall be liable for any content.

All original member content posted on this forum becomes the property of TB2K Inc. for archival and display purposes on the Timebomb2000 website venue. Said content may be removed or edited at staff discretion. The original authors retain all rights to their material outside of the Timebomb2000.com website venue. Publication of any original material from Timebomb2000.com on other websites or venues without permission from TB2K Inc. or the original author is expressly forbidden.



"Timebomb2000", "TB2K" and "Watching the World Tick Away" are Service Mark℠ TB2K, Inc. All Rights Reserved.