Check out the TB2K CHATROOM, open 24/7               Configuring Your Preferences for OPTIMAL Viewing
  To access our Email server, CLICK HERE

  If you are unfamiliar with the Guidelines for Posting on TB2K please read them.      ** LINKS PAGE **



*** Help Support TB2K ***
via mail, at TB2K Fund, P.O. Box 24, Coupland, TX, 78615
or


TECH Government Scientists Have A Plan For Blowing Up Asteroids With A Nuke
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    87,823

    3 Government Scientists Have A Plan For Blowing Up Asteroids With A Nuke

    For links see article source.....
    Posted for fair use.....
    https://www.buzzfeed.com/danvergano/...myR#.wg3LZ0bj6

    Government Scientists Have A Plan For Blowing Up Asteroids With A Nuke

    There's a teeny chance that a giant asteroid might blast Earth in 2135, so scientists are working on a solution.

    Posted on March 7, 2018, at 7:32 a.m.

    Dan Vergano
    BuzzFeed News Reporter
    Washington, DC
    Reporting From
    Washington, DC

    The asteroid Bennu, a boulder the size of a village, is circling the sun at 63,000 mph, now a comfortable 54 million miles from Earth.

    But on Sept. 21, 2135, there is a 1 in 2,700 chance that it will hit us. What would we do?

    Government scientists now have an official plan, just in case: They’ve designed a spacecraft to hit any large oncoming asteroids with a nuclear explosion.

    The Hypervelocity Asteroid Mitigation Mission for Emergency Response (HAMMER) spacecraft — a collaboration between the National Nuclear Security Administration, NASA, and two Energy Department weapons labs — would either steer its 8.8-ton bulk (called an “impactor”) into a small asteroid, or carry a nuclear device to deflect a big one.

    “If the asteroid is small enough, and we detect it early enough, we can do it with the impactor,” physicist David Dearborn of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory told BuzzFeed News. “The impactor is not as flexible as the nuclear option when we really want to change the speed of the body in a hurry.”

    Just because these plans now exist does not mean the spacecraft will ever get built. NASA scientists declined to give a cost estimate for a mission, citing the sensitivity of pricing information, but for comparison, NASA’s more complex OSIRIS-REx mission, now on its way to Bennu, cost $800 million.

    Reported by the journal Acta Astronautica, the HAMMER design was originally called for in a 2010 National Research Council report warning about the threat of an undetected asteroid impact to human civilization. It will be presented at a May conference for asteroid experts in Japan.

    Earth has been hit by asteroids with regularity for the last 4.6 billion years, from the 6-mile-wide one blamed for the end of the dinosaur era 66 million years ago to the 2013 airburst over Chelyabinsk, Russia, that broke windows all along its 300-mile passage.

    NASA’s Center for Near-Earth Object Studies now lists 73 asteroids, ranging from house-sized to stadium-sized, as having the very small chance — 1 in 1,600 for the most likely, the asteroid 410777 — of hitting the Earth in the next century.

    The big question always is: If we see one headed our way, what are we going to do about it? The publication of the spacecraft design shows that planetary protection experts have accepted a nuclear blast as a real option after decades of resistance, Dearborn said.

    “Smart people are taking this seriously and thinking carefully about what might be done,” MIT impact expert Richard Binzel told BuzzFeed News. “These are reasonable ideas — well thought out,” he said of the HAMMER proposal, which seeks to design a feasible spacecraft capable of deflecting an asteroid, either by impact or by nuclear explosion.

    In the study, the experts considered what it would take to deflect Bennu, a 1,600-foot-wide ball that weighs 174 billion pounds, and travels in a roughly circular orbit with Earth. An impact would trigger a blast of 1.15 gigatons of energy, roughly 23 times bigger than the largest hydrogen bomb blast. Since NASA’s OSIRIS-REx will visit the asteroid in August, they relied on the same trajectory calculations for the hypothetical HAMMER mission.

    Ideally, a trajectory would carry a multitude of these spacecraft just in front of the asteroid, where it would run them over in a series of 22,000 mph collisions. The basic idea is to slow the asteroid down with these punches, pulling it closer to the sun and off its trajectory with Earth.

    “You have to be careful not to slow it down just enough to go from hitting the [side] of the Earth to hitting its center,” Dearborn said.

    It’s difficult to calculate exactly where and when an asteroid will strike because these flying rocks interact with the solar wind and the distant gravitational pull of objects like Jupiter, steadily perturbing their orbits all the time. NASA has done it before, though, in the 2005 Deep Impact mission that smacked into the asteroid Tempel 1, surprising astronomers with the discovery that the asteroid had the composition of fine powder.

    Looking for dangerous asteroids now could save a lot of trouble later, when something like a nuclear bomb in space, not a popular idea with any nation, might be the only option. “Time is the most important factor,” said Binzel, who was not part of the study team. “If you have more time, this problem gets much easier.”

    For a very large asteroid that appears headed toward Earth with little warning, for example, the analysis suggests that only a nuclear explosion would safely prevent an impact. An interstellar asteroid 'Oumuamua, about as wide as Bennu, was only spotted in October after it had passed Earth’s orbital distance from the sun.

    Although a bigger bomb would be better, current US nuclear warhead sizes would be sufficient to deflect a very large asteroid that comes out of nowhere, Dearborn said.

    Only about one-third of all asteroids near Earth more than 460 feet across have been discovered, astronomers estimate, leaving a lot of problematic ones undetected. Designing a spacecraft to blow one up is a good precaution, Binzel said, but for it to matter, NASA needs to keep prioritizing detection.

    “Hopefully we won't need an asteroid deflection plan,” Binzel said. “But until we search, we don't know.”

    Dan Vergano is a science reporter for BuzzFeed News and is based in Washington, DC.

    Contact Dan Vergano at dan.vergano@buzzfeed.com.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Happy on the mountain
    Posts
    58,403
    Oh boy.

    Nukes in space.

    Getting pounded by radioactive asteroid fragments.

    What could go wrong?
    The wonder of our time isn’t how angry we are at politics and politicians; it’s how little we’ve done about it. - Fran Porretto
    -http://bastionofliberty.blogspot.com/2016/10/a-wholly-rational-hatred.html

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    87,823
    Quote Originally Posted by Dozdoats View Post
    Oh boy.

    Nukes in space.

    Getting pounded by radioactive asteroid fragments.

    What could go wrong?
    Well to be fair, the objective wouldn't necessarily be to pulverize an asteroid as much as change its delta V so it missed the Earth. The sooner you spotted one and could get an intercept vehicle up to it, the less energy you'd need to accomplish that goal. The problem right now is we're not searching hard enough for them with enough gear to reliably find them that early.

    About the only upside we've got at the moment is that the Dragon/Grasshopper series of launch vehicles are making the potential for a necessary launch a much easier proposition.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Tennessee's version of Gotham (Knoxville)
    Posts
    3,979
    Quote Originally Posted by Housecarl View Post
    Well to be fair, the objective wouldn't necessarily be to pulverize an asteroid as much as change its delta V so it missed the Earth. The sooner you spotted one and could get an intercept vehicle up to it, the less energy you'd need to accomplish that goal. The problem right now is we're not searching hard enough for them with enough gear to reliably find them that early.

    About the only upside we've got at the moment is that the Dragon/Grasshopper series of launch vehicles are making the potential for a necessary launch a much easier proposition.
    And I would also say that space X is changing everything in that arena too.
    1 Corinthians 18:20 “I will destroy the wisdom of the wise;
    the intelligence of the intelligent I will frustrate.”

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Anna, Texas
    Posts
    2,418
    1 they have to find one in time.
    2 they have to get a nuke in place in time.

    They haven't shown their ability to find them until there on top of us and have no rockets that will go fast enough.

    Thus it is just another piece of science fiction.
    "When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law." ~ Frederic Bastiilt

    "Duty is ours; results are God's."

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    N. Minnesota
    Posts
    10,902
    Then there's all the ones we DON"T see...

    A fine idea if they can get it off the ground but NASA doesn't seem to be able to accomplish much lately.

  7. #7
    Wasn't that a Bruce Willis movie?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Swimming in sea quarks
    Posts
    3,767
    Quote Originally Posted by Sacajawea View Post
    Wasn't that a Bruce Willis movie?
    It was.
    Facts?? We don't need no stinkin facts...

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Pahrump, NV
    Posts
    504
    Quote Originally Posted by Rayku View Post
    (Wasn't that a Bruce Willis Movie?) It was.
    Actually, "Deep Impact" with Robert Duvall and Tea Leoni was a better movie example.

    An above poster was correct: the sooner one is detected, the easier it is to deflect and also, a nuke is not then needed.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


NOTICE: Timebomb2000 is an Internet forum for discussion of world events and personal disaster preparation. Membership is by request only. The opinions posted do not necessarily represent those of TB2K Incorporated (the owner of this website), the staff or site host. Responsibility for the content of all posts rests solely with the Member making them. Neither TB2K Inc, the Staff nor the site host shall be liable for any content.

All original member content posted on this forum becomes the property of TB2K Inc. for archival and display purposes on the Timebomb2000 website venue. Said content may be removed or edited at staff discretion. The original authors retain all rights to their material outside of the Timebomb2000.com website venue. Publication of any original material from Timebomb2000.com on other websites or venues without permission from TB2K Inc. or the original author is expressly forbidden.



"Timebomb2000", "TB2K" and "Watching the World Tick Away" are Service Mark℠ TB2K, Inc. All Rights Reserved.