Check out the TB2K CHATROOM, open 24/7               Configuring Your Preferences for OPTIMAL Viewing
  To access our Email server, CLICK HERE

  If you are unfamiliar with the Guidelines for Posting on TB2K please read them.      ** LINKS PAGE **



*** Help Support TB2K ***
via mail, at TB2K Fund, P.O. Box 24, Coupland, TX, 78615
or


GOV/MIL Awans Allegedly Funneled Dems' Data to Secret Server, Falsified Evidence To Cover It Up
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    America, The Beautiful
    Posts
    22,634

    2 Awans Allegedly Funneled Dems' Data to Secret Server, Falsified Evidence To Cover It Up

    The Daily Caller Foundation is doing a heckuva job reporting and investigating this story. Go to the source link to view charts and many, many links to other stories and documents.


    http://dailycaller.com/2017/09/12/ex...secret-server/

    EXCLUSIVE: DWS IT Guy Was Banned From House After Trying To Hide Secret Server

    Luke Rosiak
    8:47 PM 09/12/2017

    A secret server is behind the Capitol Police’s decision to ban a former IT aide to Democratic Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz from the House network.

    Now-indicted former congressional IT aide Imran Awan allegedly routed data from numerous House Democrats to a secret server. Police grew suspicious and requested a copy of the server early this year, but they were provided with an elaborate falsified image designed to hide the massive violations. The falsified image is what ultimately triggered their ban from the House network Feb. 2, according to a senior House official with direct knowledge of the investigation.

    The secret server was connected to the House Democratic Caucus, an organization chaired by then-Rep. Xavier Becerra. Police informed Becerra that the server was the subject of an investigation and requested a copy of it. Authorities considered the false image they received to be interference in a criminal investigation, the senior official said.

    Data was also backed up to Dropbox in huge quantities, the official said.

    Congressional offices are prohibited from using Dropbox, so an unofficial account was used, meaning Awan could have still had access to the data even though he was banned from the congressional network.

    Awan had access to all emails and office computer files of 45 members of Congress who are listed below. [Go to the source for the list.] Fear among members that Awan could release embarrassing information if they cooperated with prosecutors could explain why the Democrats have refused to acknowledge the cybersecurity breach publicly or criticize the suspects.

    House Democrats employed Awan and four family members for years as IT aides. After learning of the House probe, Awan and his wife, Hina Alvi, frantically transferred money to accounts in their native Pakistan.

    Awan and Alvi were indicted in August on fraud charges related to the transfers, but they have not yet been charged with criminal cybersecurity violations partly because some of the 45 Democrats have been passive about helping build the case, the House official said.

    Each House member’s data is supposed to be stored on his own server, but Imran moved files to a computer that was only supposed to hold the files of the administrative office of the Democratic Caucus, the senior official said.

    In the spring of 2016, House administrators became aware that the Awans were allegedly falsifying purchase orders. They followed the trail and found that the misconduct extended to a major cybersecurity breach.

    On Jan. 24, 2017, Becerra vacated his congressional seat to become California’s attorney general. “He wanted to wipe his server, and we brought to his attention it was under investigation. The light-off was we asked for an image of the server, and they deliberately turned over a fake server,” the senior official said.

    “They were using the House Democratic Caucus as their central service warehouse … It was a breach. The data was completely out of [the members’] possession. Does it mean it was sold to the Russians? I don’t know,” the senior official said.

    Capitol Police considered the image a sign that the Awans knew exactly what they were doing and were going to great lengths to try to cover it up, the senior official said. The House Sergeant-at-Arms banned them from the network as a result.

    The senior official said the data was also funneled offsite via a Dropbox account, from which copies could easily be downloaded. Authorities could not immediately shut down the account when the Awans were banned from the network because it was not an official account.

    “For members to say their data was not compromised is simply inaccurate. They had access to all the data including all emails. Imran Awan is the walking example of an insider threat, a criminal actor who had access to everything,” the senior official said.

    The executive director of the Democratic Caucus was Sean McCluskie, who was Becerra’s chief of staff and is now chief deputy attorney general of California. McCluskie did not return TheDCNF’s repeated requests for comment.

    Despite Democrats’ acute awareness of the importance of cybersecurity after the Democratic National Committee’s emails appeared on Wikileaks in July 2016, the employing members have gone to great lengths to avoid condemning Awan or have said nothing about whether they checked their office data’s security following the breach.

    “After being notified by the House Administration Committee, this individual was removed from our payroll. We are confident that everything in our office is secure,” a spokesman for Michigan Democratic Rep. Sander Levin told TheDCNF in February. Levin’s chief of staff Nick Gwyn refused this week to square the assessment with the secret server and Dropbox arrangement.

    A spokesman for Ohio Democratic Rep. Marcia Fudge said in August that she terminated Awan after learning of the criminal investigation but claimed “there’s no indication that he stole information or did anything inappropriate.” Fudge’s spokesman would not clarify the August statement this week.

    Since Fudge and other members have not acknowledged that the breach occurred, there is no reason to think they took action to investigate where their data might have gone and mitigate any harm to constituents and others.

    Wasserman Schultz has acknowledged that chiefs of staff were informed that the Awans were under investigation for what she characterized as “data transfer violations.” She refused to fire Awan even after he was banned from touching official computers, and she used a May 17, 2017, budget hearing with the House Chief Administrative Officer to attack authorities for not stopping her from breaking the Dropbox rule.

    “I am more than happy to admit that I use Dropbox. I have used it for years and years and years. It is not blocked. I am fully able to use it,” she said. Administrators told her they had clearly communicated the rules to IT aides, but instead of faulting Awan for not following them, Wasserman Schultz lashed out at the House for “just lobbing e-mail into a tech person’s inbox.”

    The senior official said the Awans’ enterprise-scale use of Dropbox was not the casual use of a popular consumer application, but the funneling of huge quantities of data offsite where it could not be taken back by House authorities.

    Becerra was one of five members who first hired Awan in 2004, his first year on the Hill. Only two of the five — Rep. Gregory Meeks of New York and Becerra — remained in office through 2016, and each of them later put two of Awan’s relatives on their payrolls as well, including his wife Alvi and brother Abid.

    When Becerra became chairman of the Democratic Caucus in 2013, that office began paying Alvi $25,000 to $30,000 a year in addition to the payments from Becerra’s personal office, meaning he was responsible for far more of the payments to the Awan family than any other member.
    Qui tacet consentire videtur

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Northern Michigan
    Posts
    6,851
    and this was the dude Waserman-Shultz was protecting.

    "progressives" - progressively destroying America for decades.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    America, The Beautiful
    Posts
    22,634
    Quote Originally Posted by undead View Post
    and this was the dude Waserman-Shultz was protecting.
    Yes indeed.
    Qui tacet consentire videtur

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Over there
    Posts
    5,489
    Wasserman Schultz has acknowledged that chiefs of staff were informed that the Awans were under investigation for what she characterized as “data transfer violations.” She refused to fire Awan even after he was banned from touching official computers, and she used a May 17, 2017, budget hearing with the House Chief Administrative Officer to attack authorities for not stopping her from breaking the Dropbox rule.

    “I am more than happy to admit that I use Dropbox. I have used it for years and years and years. It is not blocked. I am fully able to use it,” she said. Administrators told her they had clearly communicated the rules to IT aides, but instead of faulting Awan for not following them, Wasserman Schultz lashed out at the House for “just lobbing e-mail into a tech person’s inbox.”
    Noodle head is going to prison! Yes!

  5. #5
    The seriousness of this investigation can't be minimized. I'm finding it rediculous that the Dems - and the gov IT people - didn't realize that anyone with admin rights to a server has complete and full access to everything that passes through it - and can do anything they want with that information.

    Ultimately, that leads me to conclude the DEMs involved intentionally intended this espionage for their own political purposes. A pretty good case for that is being built, despite the endless prevarication and lying indulged in by the parties involved. Purgery even.

    THIS more than anything else might be the lever to bring down the whole Clinton-Bush-Deep State edifice. Only thing I'm confused about is why Alvi is returning to the US, to testify - unless the Awan's intend to hang the Dems out to dry.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Cow Hampshire
    Posts
    15,295
    Ultimately, that leads me to conclude the DEMs involved intentionally intended this espionage for their own political purposes. A pretty good case for that is being built, despite the endless prevarication and lying indulged in by the parties involved. Purgery even.
    That would be perjury. And this may be where the Democrats got their "Russia" idea to apply to the Trump election.

    Funny how they themselves seem to be guilty of EVERYTHING they accuse others of.

    Dobbin
    I hinnire propter hoc ecce ego

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    A Socialist State
    Posts
    12,169
    Thanks for the update Thompson. Luke Rosiak is doing a helluv-a job following all this information.

    PRAY FOR HIS SAFETY!
    Don't just go to church. BE THE CHURCH!

  8. #8
    Wait... Let's evaluate any potential wrongdoing using the brand spankin' new bitcheryclinton test.

    Only question necessary: Was the poor dude's concealment of his secret server intentional or not?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    West Virginia
    Posts
    33,122
    Quote Originally Posted by undead View Post
    and this was the dude Waserman-Shultz was protecting.



    Either she was having an affair with Awan or some serious black mail was taking place.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Central South Carolina
    Posts
    2,262
    Quote Originally Posted by Dobbin View Post
    That would be perjury. And this may be where the Democrats got their "Russia" idea to apply to the Trump election.

    Funny how they themselves seem to be guilty of EVERYTHING they accuse others of.

    Dobbin
    If you were Satan, how much bigger bragging rights could you have in your sinful, wicked ways than to proclaim loudly the vile acts you commit and blame the opposition? If you can get away with some heinous act and simultaneously hang the charge around the necks of the innocent you'd be the hero of hell! Don't you just know they laugh like hyenas at this wholesale fraud?

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    zone 6a
    Posts
    24,550
    RB I think they tip Baccarat crystal low balls filled with top shelf paid for with our illegally siphoned tax dollars as the devil pats them on the back saying 'well done minions, well done'.
    Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is Liberty. II Cor. 3:17

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


NOTICE: Timebomb2000 is an Internet forum for discussion of world events and personal disaster preparation. Membership is by request only. The opinions posted do not necessarily represent those of TB2K Incorporated (the owner of this website), the staff or site host. Responsibility for the content of all posts rests solely with the Member making them. Neither TB2K Inc, the Staff nor the site host shall be liable for any content.

All original member content posted on this forum becomes the property of TB2K Inc. for archival and display purposes on the Timebomb2000 website venue. Said content may be removed or edited at staff discretion. The original authors retain all rights to their material outside of the Timebomb2000.com website venue. Publication of any original material from Timebomb2000.com on other websites or venues without permission from TB2K Inc. or the original author is expressly forbidden.



"Timebomb2000", "TB2K" and "Watching the World Tick Away" are Service Mark℠ TB2K, Inc. All Rights Reserved.